Facebook
TwitterInvestigator(s): National Center for State Courts, Court Statistics and Information Management Project This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics and Technology Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include: (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of investigation, cases are separated by main case type. Types include civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, administrative agency appeals, and several other types. Years Produced: Updated annually
Facebook
TwitterThis study analyzed the determinants of the explosion in the caseload of the United States federal district courts that commenced in 1960. First, the study sought to provide forecasts of future demands on the federal courts while reducing forecasting errors by taking account of the time series properties of the case data. The researchers constructed a comprehensive dataset based on annual aggregated civil and criminal case volumes of individual federal district courts spanning the period 1904-1998, for a total of 95 yearly observations. Secondly, the study specified and estimated multivariate econometric models of the determinants of civil case filings over time and across geographic space using panel data techniques. These empirical models were run on three alternative datasets consisting of observations on statewide, districtwide, and circuitwide United States civil, private civil, and total civil cases per capita, over the period 1960 to 1998. The empirical models included standard socioeconomic variables, such as income, population density, and race, along with variables that controlled for fixed effects associated with the courts' geographic location. The study also addressed the pressing issue of allocating judgeships across circuits and districts. Variables include total civil and criminal cases, percentage of minority population, unemployment rate, percentage of drug and immigration cases, annual unweighted and weighted total case filings per judge, and annual civil and criminal case filings per judge.
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q4 2024 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
This report covers the period to the end of December 2024.
This is the second release of data following the implementation of the “One Crown” project which has aligned definitions, methodologies and data processing for all published Crown Court measures across MOJ and HMCTS. Following an external quality review in December, the data have undergone a review by the Office for Statistics regulation which agreed with the earlier review to find significant confidence in the data and retain the Accredited Official Statistics status of this release.
As part of the “One Crown” implementation, we have continued to improve our Crown Court methodology and align HMCTS and MoJ processes. We have reviewed and improved all remaining headline Crown Court measures. This approach ensures that we continue to release robust, trustworthy and high value data. The impact of change is small, and trends are largely unchanged. Further detail concerning each change and the impacts on published series are available in the consultation document.
The demand on the criminal courts continues to grow with receipt volumes increasing at both the magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court. Receipts in the last year are higher than they have been across the series and are 13% higher than the previous year.
Disposals volumes have increased but remain below receipts at both magistrates and Crown courts resulting in the open caseload continuing to grow. At the Crown Court the open caseload continued to report a series peak, reaching 74,651 cases at the end of December 2024.
In the latest period trial effectiveness has remained stable and timeliness has fallen back from series peaks – both remain above pre-COVID levels seen in 2019.
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release on 27th June 2025.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Private Offices; Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy; Director General, Chief Operating Officer Group; Direct, Courts and Family Justice; Director Analysis; Director, Chief Data Officer; Deputy Director, Criminal Justice Strategy and Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Policy and Procedure; Criminal Court Insights; Deputy Director, Courts and Tribunals Joint Unit; Courts and Tribunal Joint Unit; Deputy Director, RASSO and Domestic Abuse Policy; Rape Review; Courts Victim Experience and Attrition; Deputy Head of News; 3 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Chief Finance Officer, HMCTS; Director of Operations, HMCTS; Director, Strategy Analysis and Planning; Director, Communications; Head of External Communications, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Analysis and Performance (x2); Crime reporting and analysis; Deputy Director, Crime Live Service Owner; Crime Service Manager (x2); Deputy Director, Intelligent Client Function and Contract Services Division; Operational Contract Manager; Contract Support Officer.
Chief Executive; Head of Digital and Data; Data Analyst (x2)
Private Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs; Justice and Home Affairs Policy Unit; Communications; Analysts
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q1 2025 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
This report covers the period to the end of March 2025.
The demand on the criminal courts continues to grow with receipt volumes maintaining high levels at the magistrates’ – with increases seen for more serious “for trial” cases. Receipts at the Crown Court have maintained high-levels over the last year, with over 30,000 cases entering the Crown Court in the latest quarter.
Disposals volumes have shown little change but remain below receipts at both magistrates and Crown courts resulting in the open caseload continuing to grow. At the Crown Court the open caseload continued to report a series peak, reaching 76,957 cases at the end of March 2025.
In the latest period trial effectiveness has remained stable and time taken for Crown Court cases has increased slightly following falls from series peaks – both remain above pre-COVID levels seen in 2019.
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release on 25th September 2025.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Private Offices; Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy; Director General, Chief Operating Officer Group; Direct, Courts and Family Justice; Director Analysis; Director, Chief Data Officer; Deputy Director, Criminal Justice Strategy and Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Policy and Procedure; Criminal Court Insights; Deputy Director, Courts and Tribunals Joint Unit; Courts and Tribunal Joint Unit; Deputy Director, RASSO and Domestic Abuse Policy; Rape Review; Courts Victim Experience and Attrition; Deputy Head of News; 3 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Chief Finance Officer, HMCTS; Director of Operations, HMCTS; Director, Strategy Analysis and Planning; Director, Communications; Head of External Communications, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Analysis and Performance (x2); Crime reporting and analysis; Deputy Director, Crime Live Service Owner; Crime Service Manager (x2); Deputy Director, Intelligent Client Function and Contract Services Division; Operational Contract Manager; Contract Support Officer.
Chief Executive; Head of Digital and Data; Data Analyst (x2)
Private Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs; Justice and Home Affairs Policy Unit; Communications; Analysts
Facebook
TwitterThis data collection examines the impact of caseload pressures on both intermediate appellate courts and supreme courts for each state in the nation. The data describe in detail the changes made by appellate courts and supply information related to each change. These changes include (1) adding judges, law clerks and staff attorneys, (2) expanding or creating intermediate appellate courts, (3) reducing panel size, (4) using summary procedures, (5) curtailing opinion practices by deciding cases without opinion or unpublished and memo opinions, and (6) curtailing oral argument length.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
The Youth Justice Annual Workload Data covers the workload of Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) in England and Wales and contains information on: proven offences which have resulted in a disposal; court remands; disposals; intensive supervision and surveillance programmes; young people in custody. Source agency: Justice Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Youth Justice Board caseload statistics
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q4 2020 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Management information concerning the enforcement of financial penalties in England and Wales;
Experimental statistics on ‘the use of language interpreter and translation services in courts and tribunals;
Experimental statistics on Failure to Appear Warrants at magistrates’ courts in England and Wales.
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
“This report covers the period to the end of December 2020 and shows the continued impact of COVID-19 on the criminal courts.
Following the limited operation of the criminal courts and the gradual reintroduction of jury trials during the report period, the figures published today show the continued recovery in the system. This can be more clearly seen at the magistrates’ courts, where disposals remained above receipts and the outstanding caseload has consistently fallen.
Some of the magistrates’ court disposals will feed directly through to the Crown Court, where receipts have maintained higher levels seen in Q3 2020. Disposals have increased but at a slower rate than receipts, as a result the outstanding caseload has continued to rise.
We are publishing experimental analysis on the nature of the outstanding caseload for the first time. This shows that the age of outstanding cases has increased sharply due to the COVID-19 pandemic response and the proportion of cases which have been outstanding for more than a year has increased markedly.
The trends at both magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court continue beyond the National Statistics series into more recent management information published by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) – which are highlighted in this document.”
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release in June 2021.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy, Communications and Analysis; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Deputy Director, Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Reform Lead; Courts and Tribunal Recovery Unit; Jurisdictional and Operational Support Manager; Head of Data and Analytical Services; Chief Statistician; 5 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Legal Services, Court Users and Summary Justice Reform; Head of Operational Performance; Head of Criminal Enforcement team, HMCTS; Head of data and management information, HMCTS; Head of Management Information Systems; Head of Communications; Head of News; Jurisdictional Operation manager and Head of Contracted Services and Performance for HMCTS Operations Directorate
Chair of the Bar Council, Director of Communications, Research Manager
1 Senior Policy Official and 1 Statistician
Facebook
TwitterAlso being published are detailed breakdowns of the headline court caseload and timeliness statistics, broken down by court or Local Justice Area. More information can be found at http://open.justice.gov.uk/">open.justice.gov.uk.
The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff. In addition to Ministry of Justice professional and production staff, pre-release access to the provisional court statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following postholders: Ministry of Justice: Secretary of State, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister of State (Policing and Criminal Justice), Permanent Secretary, Director General of Finance and Public Services, Head of Analytical Services, Chief Executive, Chief Statistician, Policy Advisor (Civil Justice), Policy Advisor (Public Law), Policy Advisor (Private Law and Matrimonial Justice), Press Officers and Relevant Special Advisers.
Her Majesty’s Court Service: Chief Executive, Director of Civil, Family and Tribunals, Deputy Director of Civil and Family, Director of Crime, Head of Civil Operations Branch, Head of Family Performance & Management Information , Head of Crown Court Improvement Branch, Head of Criminal Enforcement, and Jurisdictional and Operational Support Officer (Magistrates).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Studies on court administration in India have so far focussed their attention largely on caseload management and judge strength of the higher judiciary. An in-depth investigation of the productivity of India’s lower courts, the primary loci of a citizen’s contact with the judiciary, remains missing. We conduct a novel, quantitative analysis of a large dataset of more than 1700 district courts across India between 2010 and 2018, to measure court productivity through the metric of case disposal.
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q2 2023 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
This report covers the period to the end of June 2023.
The volume of receipts in the Crown court in the latest quarter is the highest for over two years, and coupled with a reduction in disposals, has led to an increase in the outstanding caseload in the Crown Court. Outstanding cases in the magistrates’ court have also increased in the latest period, with more receipts than disposals recorded.
The effective trial rates at both magistrates’ and Crown Courts showed little change, after recovering in the previous two quarters, following the Criminal Bar Association action; and the average length of time between offence and completion (end-to-end timeliness) decreased at both magistrates’ and Crown Court.
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release on 21st December 2023.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy; Director General, Performance, Strategy and Analysis; Director, Access to Justice; Director General, Chief Financial Officer; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Deputy Director, Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Reform Lead; Courts and Tribunal Recovery Unit; Jurisdictional and Operational Support Manager; Head of Data and Analytical Services; Chief Statistician; 5 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Legal Services, Court Users and Summary Justice Reform; Head of Operational Performance; Head of Criminal Enforcement team, HMCTS; Head of data and management information, HMCTS; Head of Management Information Systems; Head of Communications; Head of News; Jurisdictional Operation manager and Head of Contracted Services and Performance for HMCTS Operations Directorate.
Facebook
TwitterThese statistics focus on three main categories: civil, family and criminal cases. This edition also includes supplementary information on specialised courts functions including the Judicial Reviews, application under the Mental Capacity Act and the assessment of litigation costs, and publicly funded legal services.
To find further information on the topics covered in this publication please see ‘A Guide to Court and Administrative Justice Statistics’ which is published alongside this report. We welcome feedback on this document and on the proposed changes we have to future publications of Court Statistics Quarterly. If you would like to provide feedback please see the contacts page at the back of this report.
These statistics are used to monitor the type and volume of cases that are received and processed through the court system of England and Wales. Seasonal variations affecting the workload of the courts may impact on comparisons with other periods. Because the figures for the latest quarter are provisional, the numbers and trends highlighted in the commentary may be subject to revision in the future.
Also being published are detailed breakdowns of the headline court caseload and timeliness statistics, broken down by court or Local Justice Area. More information can be found at http://open.justice.gov.uk/">open.justice.gov.uk.
The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff.
In addition to Ministry of Justice professional and production staff, pre-release access to the provisional court statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following postholders:
Ministry of Justice: Secretary of State, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister of State (Policing and Criminal Justice), Permanent Secretary, Director General of Finance and Public Services, Head of Legal Services Commission, Head of Analytical Services, Chief Execut
Facebook
TwitterAnnual offender management caseload statistics, covering probation and prisons in England and Wales.
With effect from 28 April 2011, this data will be published in conjunction with the http://www.justice.gov.uk/statistics/prisons-and-probation/oms-quarterly/oms-quarterly-editions">Offender Management Statistics Quarterly bulletin.
For those under probation service supervision, the report shows the main characteristics of offenders, activities relating to pre- and post-release supervision and breaches of community sentences.
For those in prison, the report presents the main characteristics of the prison population, receptions and releases.
This publication is released by the Ministry of Justice and produced in accordance with arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority.
The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff. Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons:
Ministry of Justice: Secretary of State; Minister of State; Head of Management & Stats, Public Protection and Mental Health Group; Head of Risk of Harm and Victims Section, Public Protection and Mental Health Group; Head of Population Strategy Unit, National Operations Group; Probation lead, Chief Operating Officer’s Office, NOMS; Head of Sentencing Policy and Penalties Unit; Permanent Secretary; Director General of NOMs; Chief Executive of NOMS; Head of Offender Assessment Management Group; Head of Policy and Practice, Public Protection and Mental Health Group; Manager, Population Strategy Unit, National Operations Group; Senior Manager, Population Strategy Unit, National Operations Group; Snr Manager, Offender Safety, Right & Responsibilities Group, NOMS; Support to Probation Lead, Chief Executive’s Office, NOMS; and relevant special adviser and press officers.
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q2 2022 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
This report covers the period to the end of June 2022.
The latest figures show Crown Court outstanding caseloads increasing for the first time in over a year as a result of disposals falling below receipts. This is likely, at least in part, due to the Criminal Bar Association action. Outstanding caseloads at the magistrates’ court continued to decrease, where both disposals and receipts fell in the latest quarter.
The proportion of trials which are rescheduled on the day of trial (‘ineffective’) at the Crown Court has also increased in the latest quarter, with (lack of) defence barrister availability becoming the strongest contributing factor.
Timeliness estimates, which reflect the length of time a case has taken at the point of completion and therefore covers the period where the pandemic disrupted court processes, showed a mixed picture. Timeliness decreased in both Magistrates and Crown Court but remain above pre-COVID levels.
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release on 19 January 2023.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy; Director General, Performance, Strategy and Analysis; Director, Access to Justice; Director General, Chief Financial Officer; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Deputy Director, Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Reform Lead; Courts and Tribunal Recovery Unit; Jurisdictional and Operational Support Manager; Head of Data and Analytical Services; Chief Statistician; 5 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Legal Services, Court Users and Summary Justice Reform; Head of Operational Performance; Head of Criminal Enforcement team, HMCTS; Head of data and management information, HMCTS; Head of Management Information Systems; Head of Communications; Head of News; Jurisdictional Operation manager and Head of Contracted Services and Performance for HMCTS Operations Directorate.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://data.gov.sg/open-data-licencehttps://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence
Dataset from Singapore Department of Statistics. For more information, visit https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_126d6f58c18f565242425800f88b34b8/view
Facebook
TwitterThis is the quarterly Q2 2021 criminal courts statistics publication.
The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:
Management information concerning the enforcement of financial penalties in England and Wales;
Experimental statistics on ‘the use of language interpreter and translation services in courts and tribunals;
Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.
This report covers the period to the end of June 2021, it shows the impact of COVID-19 response on criminal courts and the recovery from measures put in place to minimise risks to court users.
Following the limited operation of the criminal courts, particularly during Spring 2020, and the gradual reintroduction of jury trials during the reporting period, the figures published today show the continued recovery in the system.
The volume of listed trials at both the magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court continues to increase, returning close to pre-COVID levels.
Disposals at the magistrates’ courts and Crown Courts continue to rise from series lows in the previous year. Receipts remain above disposals at the Crown Court meaning that the outstanding caseload continues to grow, although this growth has slowed and the latest management information from Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service to July 2021 indicate that outstanding volumes have begun to stabilise.
The continued impacts of the COVID response and ongoing restrictions are also evident in the increase in timeliness estimates across both magistrates’ courts and Crown Courts.
The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release on 16 December 2021.
In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:
Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy, Communications and Analysis; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Deputy Director, Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Reform Lead; Courts and Tribunal Recovery Unit; Jurisdictional and Operational Support Manager; Head of Data and Analytical Services; Chief Statistician; 5 Press Officers.
Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Legal Services, Court Users and Summary Justice Reform; Head of Operational Performance; Head of Criminal Enforcement team, HMCTS; Head of data and management information, HMCTS; Head of Management Information Systems; Head of Communications; Head of News; Jurisdictional Operation manager and Head of Contracted Services and Performance for HMCTS Operations Directorate
Chair of the Bar Council, Director of Communications, Research Manager
1 Senior Policy Official and 1 Statistician
Facebook
TwitterThe purpose of the study was to assess the impact of Latino ethnicity on pretrial release decisions in large urban counties. The study examined two questions:
Are Latino defendants less likely to receive pretrial releases than non-Latino defendants? Are Latino defendants in counties where the Latino population is rapidly increasing less likely to receive pretrial releases than Latino defendants in counties where the Latino population is not rapidly increasing? The study utilized the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) Database (see STATE COURT PROCESSING STATISTICS, 1990-2004: FELONY DEFENDANTS IN LARGE URBAN COUNTIES [ICPSR 2038]). The SCPS collects data on felony cases filed in state courts in 40 of the nation's 75 largest counties over selected sample dates in the month of May of every even numbered year, and tracks a representative sample of felony case defendants from arrest through sentencing. Data in the collection include 118,556 cases. Researchers supplemented the SCPS with county-level information from several sources:
Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting Program county-level data series of index crimes reported to the police for the years 1988-2004 (see UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS: COUNTY-LEVEL DETAILED ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA, 1998 [ICPSR 9335], UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA [UNITED STATES]: COUNTY-LEVEL DETAILED ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA, 1990 [ICPSR 9785], 1992 [ICPSR 6316], 1994 [ICPSR 6669], 1996 [ICPSR 2389], 1998 [ICPSR 2910], 2000 [ICPRS 3451], 2002 [ICPSR 4009], and 2004 [ICPSR 4466]). Bureau of Justice Statistics Annual Survey of Jails, Jurisdiction-Level data series for the years 1988-2004 (see ANNUAL SURVEY OF JAILS: JURISDICTION-LEVEL DATA, 1990 [ICPSR 9569], 1992 [ICPSR 6395], 1994 [ICPSR 6538], 1996 [ICPSR 6856], 1998 [ICPSR 2682], 2000 [ICPSR 3882], 2002 [ICPSR 4428], and 2004 [ICPSR 20200]). Bureau of Justice Statistics National Prosecutors Survey/Census data series 1990-2005 (see NATIONAL PROSECUTORS SURVEY, 1990 [ICPSR 9579], 1992 [ICPSR 6273], 1994 [ICPSR 6785], 1996 [ICPSR 2433], 2001 census [ICPSR 3418], and 2005 [ICPSR 4600]). United States Census Bureau State and County Quickfacts. National Center for State Courts, State Court Organization reports, 1993 (see NCJ 148346), 1998 (see NCJ 178932), and 2004 (see NCJ 212351). Bureau of Justice Statistics Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties reports, 1992 (see NCJ 148826), 1994 (see NCJ 164616), 1996 (see NCJ 176981), 1998 (see NJC 187232), 2000 (see NCJ 202021), and 2002 (see NJC 210818). The data include defendant level variables such as most serious current offense charge, number of charges, prior felony convictions, prior misdemeanor convictions, prior incarcerations, criminal justice status at arrest, prior failure to appear, age, gender, ethnicity, and race. County level variables include region, crime rate, two year change in crime rate, caseload rate, jail capacity, two year change in jail capacity, judicial selection by election or appointment, prosecutor screens cases, and annual expenditure on prosecutor's office. Racial threat stimuli variables include natural log of the percentage of the county population that is Latino, natural log of the percentage of the county population that is African American, change in the percentage of the county population that is Latino over the last six years and change in the percentage of the county population that is African American over the last six years. Cross-level interaction variables include percentage minority (Latino/African American) population zero percent to 15 percent, percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 16 percent to 30 percent, and percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 31 percent or higher.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/31961/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/31961/terms
Criminal justice researchers have studied caseload size to determine whether smaller caseloads improve probation outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether reduced caseloads improved supervision outcomes for medium to high risk offenders in a probation agency that trains its officers to apply a balance of controlling and correctional/rehabilitative measures. Three different probation agencies were selected to take part in this study. The first was Oklahoma City (Datasets 1 and 2), where a randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiment was implemented. The second site was Polk County, Iowa (Dataset 3), where a regression discontinuity design study (RDD) was implemented. Lastly, four judicial districts in Colorado (Dataset 4) were selected where a RDD study again was implemented. In Oklahoma City the RCT degenerated and the study team turned to a difference in differences (DD) estimator. The research team also collected Evidence-Based Practices Probation Officer Data (Dataset 5) from a set of survey questionnaires administered to the participating officers from the three research sites and the scoring of taped officers' supervision sessions with probationers on their caseloads by trained raters.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically
The Legal Aid Survey was a Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (CCJS)/Statistics Canada annual survey on revenues, expenditures, personnel, and caseload statistics associated with the administration and delivery of legal aid in Canada. The Legal Aid Survey was first conducted in 1983-84 and data was last published in 2016 (for fiscal year 2014-15). After the discontinuation of the Legal Aid Survey in 2016, the Department of Justice Canada (JUS) began data collection and reporting in-house. This is the third annual edition of this report.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically
The Legal Aid Survey was a Canada Centre for Justice Statistics (CCJS)/Statistics Canada annual survey on revenues. Expenditures, personnel, and caseload statistics associated with the administration and delivery of legal aid in Canada. The Legal Aid Survey was first conducted in1983-84, and the data was last published in 2016 (for the fiscal year 2014-16). After the discontinuation of the Legal Aid Survey in 2016, the Department of Justice (JUS) began data collection and reporting in-house. This is the first legal aid annual report since the cancellation of the Legal Aid Survey. Data for 2015-16 is not available due to the change in approach to data collecting and reporting. In 2016-17, JUS, through its Legal Aid Program contributed more than $138 million to the provinces and territories for the delivery of criminal legal aid, civil legal aid, and I&R (immigration and refugee) legal aid (where applicable). This amounts to 16% of total legal aid revenues.
Facebook
TwitterAn archive of statistics relating to the operation of the criminal and civil justice systems, on aspects of criminal justice policy, and on other areas of our responsibility.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/arrestsfornotibleoffences.htm">Arrests for recorded crime (notifiable offences) and the operation of certain police powers under PACE archive
Archive of National Statistics on arrests for recorded crime (notifiable offences) and the operation of certain police powers under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE).
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/averagetimearresttosentencepyo.htm">Average time from arrest to sentence for persistent young offenders archive
Archive of National Statistics on the time taken to bring persistent young offenders to justice.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/companywindingupandbankruptcy-archive.htm">Company winding up and bankruptcy petition statistics archive
Archive of quarterly National Statistics on company winding up and bankruptcy petitions in England and Wales.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/coronersannual.htm">Coroners: statistics on deaths reported archive
Archive of annual National Statistics on deaths reported to coroners, including inquests and post-mortems held, inquest verdicts returned and finds reported to coroners under treasure legislation.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/criminalannual.htm">Criminal statistics annual report archive
Archive of National Statistics on annual criminal statistics in England and Wales.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/endofcustodylicence.htm">End of custody licence releases and recalls statistics archive
Archive of monthly statistics on the numbers released from prison on end of custody licence and offenders recalled back to prison during the end of custody licence period.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090105081344/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/freedomofinformationquarterly.htm">Freedom of information: statistics on implementation in central government archive
Archive of statistics on the handling of requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Act by 43 central government bodies, including all departments of state.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/hmcsusersurvey-archive.htm">Her Majesty’s Courts Service court user survey archive
Survey measuring the satisfaction of court users, both public and professional, across England and Wales.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/judicialandcourtstatistics-archive.htm">Judicial and court statistics (annual) archive
Archive of statistics on criminal and civil courts, the judiciary and some associated offices in England and Wales for whose administration the Ministry of Justice is responsible.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/knife-crime-sentencing-archive.htm">Knife crime sentencing quarterly brief archive
Quarterly statistical bulletin describing trends in cautioning and sentencing, probation supervision and prison population for possession of a knife or offensive weapon in England and Wales.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/local-adult-reoffending-archive.htm">Local adult reoffending archive
Statistics on the reoffending of adults on the probation caseload.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110110161733/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/mappa-annual-reports.htm">MAPPA reports
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements annual reports demonstrating accountability to the communities of the 42 regions represented in England and Wales.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218140638/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/mortgatelandlordpossession.htm">Mortgage and landlord possession statistics archive
Quarterly National Statistics on possession actions issued in county courts by mortgage lenders and social and private landlords in England and Wales.</p
Facebook
TwitterInvestigator(s): National Center for State Courts, Court Statistics and Information Management Project This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics and Technology Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include: (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of investigation, cases are separated by main case type. Types include civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, administrative agency appeals, and several other types. Years Produced: Updated annually