Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
BraTS has always focused on evaluating state-of-the-art methods for segmenting brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthermore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS’20 also focuses on predicting patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).
In this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge: 1. Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions, 2. Clinical data of overall survival, 3. Clinical evaluation of progression status, 4. Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.
All BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.
All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED — label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.
Participants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
BraTS has always focused on evaluating state-of-the-art methods for segmenting brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthermore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS’20 also focuses on predicting patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).
In this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge: 1. Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions, 2. Clinical data of overall survival, 3. Clinical evaluation of progression status, 4. Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.
All BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.
All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED — label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.
Participants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.