1 dataset found
  1. BraTS2020 Correct Dataset (Training + Validation)

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Oct 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Talha Umar (2024). BraTS2020 Correct Dataset (Training + Validation) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/talhaumar/brats2020-correct-dataset-training-validation
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Oct 5, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Talha Umar
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Context

    BraTS has always focused on evaluating state-of-the-art methods for segmenting brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthermore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS’20 also focuses on predicting patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).

    Tasks' Description and Evaluation Framework

    In this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge: 1. Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions, 2. Clinical data of overall survival, 3. Clinical evaluation of progression status, 4. Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.

    Imaging Data Description

    All BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.

    All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED — label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.

    Use of Data Beyond BraTS

    Participants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.

  2. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Talha Umar (2024). BraTS2020 Correct Dataset (Training + Validation) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/talhaumar/brats2020-correct-dataset-training-validation
Organization logo

BraTS2020 Correct Dataset (Training + Validation)

Brain Tumor Segmentation 2020 Dataset

Explore at:
CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
Dataset updated
Oct 5, 2024
Dataset provided by
Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
Authors
Talha Umar
License

Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically

Description

Context

BraTS has always focused on evaluating state-of-the-art methods for segmenting brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthermore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS’20 also focuses on predicting patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).

Tasks' Description and Evaluation Framework

In this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge: 1. Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions, 2. Clinical data of overall survival, 3. Clinical evaluation of progression status, 4. Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.

Imaging Data Description

All BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.

All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED — label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.

Use of Data Beyond BraTS

Participants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu