7 datasets found
  1. K

    Kern County, CA Flood Zones

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Sep 13, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kern County, California (2018). Kern County, CA Flood Zones [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97162-kern-county-ca-flood-zones/
    Explore at:
    csv, geodatabase, kml, mapinfo tab, shapefile, mapinfo mif, pdf, dwg, geopackage / sqliteAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Kern County, California
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer is a component of Geology & Geography.

    Geology & Geography for Group Web Map Layer

  2. a

    Kern County Specific Plans

    • geodat-kernco.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 24, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KernGIS (2019). Kern County Specific Plans [Dataset]. https://geodat-kernco.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/c46f88bdd3cb45e4807a46bdf54ad57a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KernGIS
    Area covered
    Description

    The general plan is a composite of many policies, programs and intended actions to govern the future physical development of the five million acres of unincorporated Kern County. This feature layer is updated periodically throughout each year. For Land Use Descriptions, please see the Land Use, Open Space, and Conservation Element of the Kern County General Plan document located at http://www.kerncounty.com/planning/planning-documents/general-plans.Accepted County Plan Areas include the following types of plans: Rural Community plans and Specific Plans. These plans are adopted and incorporated into the Kern County General Plan map through Map Code 4.1. For specific detailed land use diagrams and applicable policies, refer to the adopted document and map of each adopted plan on file. Last Update: 2020

  3. K

    Kern County, California Assessor Parcels 2023

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Jun 20, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kern County, California (2023). Kern County, California Assessor Parcels 2023 [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/112514-kern-county-california-assessor-parcels-2023/
    Explore at:
    mapinfo mif, csv, mapinfo tab, kml, geopackage / sqlite, pdf, shapefile, geodatabase, dwgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Kern County, California
    Area covered
    Description

    This data is intended to provide a reasonable representation of parcels, as defined for property tax assessment purposes, that can be used easily in a computerized geographic information system. This data is not intended to replace the hardcopy assessment maps or any other official or unofficial county maps, and it is not to be construed as portraying legal ownership or divisions of land for purposes of zoning or subdivision law.

    This feature class contains "land" (surface rights) parcel boundaries delineated for property tax assessment purposes.

    This feature class includes all private, tax-exempt, and state-assessed land parcels listed on the secured tax roll, but does not include mineral rights (subsurface) parcels, mobilehomes, or unsecured entities.

    Parcels are modeled as planimetric polygons in a seamless fabric comprising the spatial extent of the County of Kern, in the State of California.

    Tax Roll Data is available in separate database tables, which can be joined to the feature class using the APN9 field as the SQL join key.

  4. K

    Kern County, CA Oil Wells

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Sep 13, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kern County, California (2018). Kern County, CA Oil Wells [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97160-kern-county-ca-oil-wells/
    Explore at:
    dwg, shapefile, geopackage / sqlite, csv, pdf, geodatabase, mapinfo tab, kml, mapinfo mifAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Kern County, California
    Area covered
    Description

    The California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources publishes a GIS feature class of well locations across the state for use by the public. This shapefile is the same as the data displayed in the Division's WellFinder application (http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/index.html) as of July 6, 2016. This shapefile is provided in geographic coordinates on the North American Datum of 1983. A partial description of the attributes contained in this feature class is listed on the WellFinder application's Help system (see entity and attributes section in this metadata). Geothermal wells have been excluded from this shapefile.The DOGGR Wells layer in WellFinder is also available as a WFS service at http://spatialservices.conservation.ca.gov/arcgis/rest/services/DOMS/DOMS_Wells/MapServer/WFSServer?/.Well Attributes: API Number, Well Number, Well Status, GIS Symbol, Operator Code, Operator Name, Lease Name, Field Name, Area Name, District, County, Section, Township, Range, Base Meridian, Latitude, Longitude, Elevation, Total Depth, Redrill Footage, Redrill Cancel Flag, Location Description, Comments, GIS Source Code, Dry Hole, Confidential Well, Directionally Drilled, Hydraulically Fractured, BLM Well, EPA Well, Spud Date, Completion Date, Abandoned Date

    © Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources

    This layer is a component of Geology & Geography.

  5. A

    ‘Kern County Land Use Survey 2006’ analyzed by Analyst-2

    • analyst-2.ai
    Updated Jan 28, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com) (2022). ‘Kern County Land Use Survey 2006’ analyzed by Analyst-2 [Dataset]. https://analyst-2.ai/analysis/data-gov-kern-county-land-use-survey-2006-6316/eeebc879/?iid=023-731&v=presentation
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Kern County
    Description

    Analysis of ‘Kern County Land Use Survey 2006’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/d678cf89-392c-4ea7-96a2-16286668cb5e on 28 January 2022.

    --- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

    This map is designated as Final.

    Land-Use Data Quality Control

    Every published digital survey is designated as either ‘Final’, or ‘Provisional’, depending upon its status in a peer review process.

    Final surveys are peer reviewed with extensive quality control methods to confirm that field attributes reflect the most detailed and specific land-use classification available, following the standard DWR Land Use Legendspecific to the survey year. Data sets are considered ‘final’ following the reconciliation of peer review comments and confirmation by the originating Regional Office. During final review, individual polygons are evaluated using a combination of aerial photointerpretation, satellite image multi-spectral data and time series analysis, comparison with other sources of land use data, and general knowledge of land use patterns at the local level.

    Provisional datasets have been reviewed for conformance with DWR’s published data record format, and for general agreement with other sources of land use trends. Comments based on peer review findings may not be reconciled, and no significant edits or changes are made to the original survey data.

    The 2006 Kern County land use survey data was developed by the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR) through its Division of Planning and Local Assistance (DPLA). Digitized land use boundaries and associated attributes were gathered by staff from DWR’s San Joaquin District (SJD), using extensive field visits and aerial photography. Land use polygons in agricultural areas were mapped in greater detail than areas of urban or native vegetation. Prior to the summer field survey by SJD, DPLA staff analyzed Landsat 5 imagery to identify fields likely to have winter crops. The combined land use data went through standard quality control procedures before final processing. Quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR’s DPLA Land Use Unit and SJD. This data was developed to aid DWR’s ongoing efforts to monitor land use for the main purpose of determining current and projected water uses. The associated data are considered DWR enterprise GIS data, which meet all appropriate requirements of the DWR Spatial Data Standards, specifically the DWR Spatial Data Standards version 2.1, dated March 9, 2016. DWR makes no warranties or guarantees - either expressed or implied - as to the completeness, accuracy, or correctness of the data. DWR neither accepts nor assumes liability arising from or for any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading subject data. Comments, problems, improvements, updates, or suggestions should be forwarded to gis@water.ca.gov. This data represents a land use survey of Kern County conducted by DWR, SJD staff, under the leadership of David Scruggs, Senior Land and Water Use Supervisor. The field work for this survey was conducted during the summer of 2006. SJD staff physically visited each delineated field, noting the crops grown at each location. Field survey boundary data was developed using: 1. The county was surveyed with a combination of 2005 one meter and 2006 two meter NAIP imagery. 2. The 2005 images were used in the spring of 2006 to develop the land use field boundary lines that would be used for the summer survey. The 2006 imagery was used for identification in the field and to edit any boundary line changes from the 2005 imagery. 3. These images and land use boundaries were copied onto laptop computers that were used as the field collection tools. The staff took these laptops in the field and virtually all areas were visited to positively identify the land use. The site visits occurred from June through September 2006 (approx.). Land use codes were digitized directly into the laptop computers using AUTOCAD (and a standardized digitizing process) any land use boundaries changes were noted and corrected back in the office. 4. After quality control/assurance procedures were completed on each file (DWG), the data was finalized for the summer survey. The primary focus of this land use survey is mapping agricultural fields. Urban residences and other urban areas were delineated using aerial photo interpretation. Some urban areas may have been missed, especially in forested areas. Rural residential land use was delineated by drawing polygons to surround houses and other buildings along with some of the surrounding land. These footprint areas do not represent the entire footprint of urban land. Sources of irrigation water were identified for general areas and occasionally supplemented by information obtained from landowners. Water source information was not collected for each field in the survey, so the water source listed for a specific agricultural field may not be accurate. Before final processing, standard quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR's SJD, and at DSIWM headquarters under the leadership of Jean Woods, Senior Land and Water Use Supervisor. After quality control procedures were completed, the data was finalized. The positional accuracy of the digital line work, which is based upon the orthorectified NAIP imagery, is approximately 6 meters. The land use attribute accuracy for agricultural fields is high, because almost every delineated field was visited by a surveyor. The accuracy is 95 percent because some errors may have occurred. Possible sources of attribute errors are: a) Human error in the identification of crop types, b) Data entry errors.

    --- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

  6. d

    Geologic map of the Sawmill Mountain quadrangle, Kern and Ventura Counties,...

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Karl S. Kellogg; Daniel P. Miggins (2016). Geologic map of the Sawmill Mountain quadrangle, Kern and Ventura Counties, California [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/823ed2f6-df2a-4a70-8f15-f7049b5a4712
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Karl S. Kellogg; Daniel P. Miggins
    Area covered
    Description

    The Sawmill Mountain quadrangle is located in the western Transverse Ranges of California, about 10 km west of Frazier Park. It includes Mt. Pinos, Mt. Abel (Cerro Noroeste), a part of the southern San Emigdio Mountains, and straddles an eleven-kilometer reach of the nearly east-west striking "Big Bend" section of the San Andreas Fault. South of the San Andreas Fault, the oldest rocks include undated amphibolite-grade biotite and hornblende-biotite gneiss that is probably early or middle Proterozoic in age. The older gneiss is intruded by strongly deformed and foliated biotite orthogneiss that has an age on biotite of 67.2+0.5 Ma (Late Cretaceous). Several other weakly foliated to massive Late Cretaceous granitic plutons intrude the orthogneiss, one of which has a 40Ar/39Ar on biotite of 65.9+0.2 Ma. The youngest granitic pluton, the coarse-grained, locally porphyritic granite of Mt. Pinos, is undated, but assumed to be Late Cretaceous in age. These granitic and gneissic rocks were thrust northward over Pelona Schist, which has a 40Ar/39Ar age on muscovite of 63.24+0.26 Ma. All crystalline rocks were subsequently thrust westward on the Abel Mountain thrust over rocks of the Miocene Caliente Formation. A thick section of Eocene to Pliocene sedimentary and igneous rocks is exposed in the quadrangle. In the south part of the quadrangle, lacustrine and fluvial sediments and basaltic volcanic rocks of the Plush Range Formation are in fault contact with Eocene marine shales and, across the Big Pine fault, are mostly in fault contact with rocks of the Miocene Caliente Formation; locally, the Caliente unconformably overlies the rocks of the Plush Ranch Formation. The Caliente is unconformably overlain by the distinctive Lockwood Clay, which is successively overlain by the Pliocene Quatal and Morales Formations. Rocks north of the San Andreas Fault are mostly Early Cretaceous tonalite and granodiorite containing strongly hornfelsed roof pendants of marble, metasandstone, and metapelite. Some of these rocks have been thrust over a mid-Tertiary marine section of sandstones and silicic shales. The San Andreas Fault zone is as wide as 0.7 km and occupies a valley across most of the quadrangle. It is characterized by linear scarps, grabens, sag ponds and contains several enigmatic fault-bounded phacoids of exotic rocks apparently derived from many kilometers east of the quadrangle. Many of the prominent scarps probably resulted from the giant Ft. Tejon earthquake of 1859.

  7. California Fire Perimeters (all)

    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • gis.data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Aug 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2024). California Fire Perimeters (all) [Dataset]. https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::california-fire-perimeters-all
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Forestry and Fire Protectionhttp://calfire.ca.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Version InformationThe data is updated annually with fire perimeters from the previous calendar year.Firep23_1 was released in May 2024. Two hundred eighty four fires from the 2023 fire season were added to the database (21 from BLM, 102 from CAL FIRE, 72 from Contract Counties, 19 from LRA, 9 from NPS, 57 from USFS and 4 from USFW). The 2020 Cottonwood fire, 2021 Lone Rock and Union fires, as well as the 2022 Lost Lake fire were added. USFW submitted a higher accuracy perimeter to replace the 2022 River perimeter. A duplicate 2020 Erbes fire was removed. Additionally, 48 perimeters were digitized from an historical map included in a publication from Weeks, d. et al. The Utilization of El Dorado County Land. May 1934, Bulletin 572. University of California, Berkeley. There were 2,132 perimeters that received updated attribution, the bulk of which had IRWIN IDs added. The following fires were identified as meeting our collection criteria, but are not included in this version and will hopefully be added in the next update: Big Hill #2 (2023-CAHIA-001020). YEAR_ field changed to a short integer type. San Diego CAL FIRE UNIT_ID changed to SDU (the former code MVU is maintained in the UNIT_ID domains). COMPLEX_INCNUM renamed to COMPLEX_ID and is in process of transitioning from local incident number to the complex IRWIN ID. Perimeters managed in a complex in 2023 are added with the complex IRWIN ID. Those previously added will transition to complex IRWIN IDs in a future update.If you would like a full briefing on these adjustments, please contact the data steward, Kim Wallin (kimberly.wallin@fire.ca.gov), CAL FIRE FRAP._CAL FIRE (including contract counties), USDA Forest Service Region 5, USDI Bureau of Land Management & National Park Service, and other agencies jointly maintain a fire perimeter GIS layer for public and private lands throughout the state. The data covers fires back to 1878. Current criteria for data collection are as follows:CAL FIRE (including contract counties) submit perimeters ≥10 acres in timber, ≥50 acres in brush, or ≥300 acres in grass, and/or ≥3 damaged/ destroyed residential or commercial structures, and/or caused ≥1 fatality.All cooperating agencies submit perimeters ≥10 acres._Discrepancies between wildfire perimeter data and CAL FIRE Redbook Large Damaging FiresLarge Damaging fires in California were first defined by the CAL FIRE Redbook, and has changed over time, and differs from the definition initially used to define wildfires required to be submitted for the initial compilation of this digital fire perimeter data. In contrast, the definition of fires whose perimeter should be collected has changed once in the approximately 30 years the data has been in existence. Below are descriptions of changes in data collection criteria used when compiling these two datasets. To facilitate comparison, this metadata includes a summary, by year, of fires in the Redbook, that do not appear in this fire perimeter dataset. It is followed by an enumeration of each “Redbook” fire missing from the spatial data. Wildfire Perimeter criteria:~1991: 10 acres timber, 30 acres brush, 300 acres grass, damages or destroys three residence or one commercial structure or does $300,000 worth of damage 2002: 10 acres timber, 50 acres brush, 300 acres grass, damages or destroys three or more structures, or does $300,000 worth of damage~2010: 10 acres timber, 30 acres brush, 300 acres grass, damages or destroys three or more structures (doesn’t include out building, sheds, chicken coops, etc.)Large and Damaging Redbook Fire data criteria:1979: Fires of a minimum of 300 acres that burn at least: 30 acres timber or 300 acres brush, or 1500 acres woodland or grass1981: 1979 criteria plus fires that took ,3000 hours of California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection personnel time to suppress1992: 1981 criteria plus 1500 acres agricultural products, or destroys three residence or one commercial structure or does $300,000 damage1993: 1992 criteria but “three or more structures destroyed” replaces “destroys three residence or one commercial structure” and the 3,000 hours of California Department of Forestry personnel time to suppress is removed2006: 300 acres or larger and burned at least: 30 acres of timber, or 300 acres of brush, or 1,500 acres of woodland, or 1,500 acres of grass, or 1,500 acres of agricultural products, or 3 or more structures destroyed, or $300,000 or more dollar damage loss.2008: 300 acres and largerYear# of Missing Large and Damaging Redbook Fires197922198013198115198261983319842019855219861219875619882319898199091991219921619931719942219959199615199791998101999720004200152002162003520042200512006112007320084320093201022011020124201322014720151020162201711201862019220203202102022020230Total488Enumeration of fires in the Redbook that are missing from Fire Perimeter data. Three letter unit code follows fire name.1979-Sylvandale (HUU), Kiefer (AEU), Taylor(TUU), Parker#2(TCU), PGE#10, Crocker(SLU), Silver Spur (SLU), Parkhill (SLU), Tar Springs #2 (SLU), Langdon (SCU), Truelson (RRU), Bautista (RRU), Crocker (SLU), Spanish Ranch (SLU), Parkhill (SLU), Oak Springs(BDU), Ruddell (BDF), Santa Ana (BDU), Asst. #61 (MVU), Bernardo (MVU), Otay #20 1980– Lightning series (SKU), Lavida (RRU), Mission Creek (RRU), Horse (RRU), Providence (RRU), Almond (BDU), Dam (BDU), Jones (BDU), Sycamore (BDU), Lightning (MVU), Assist 73, 85, 138 (MVU)1981– Basalt (LNU), Lightning #25(LMU), Likely (MNF), USFS#5 (SNF), Round Valley (TUU), St. Elmo (KRN), Buchanan (TCU), Murietta (RRU), Goetz (RRU), Morongo #29 (RRU), Rancho (RRU), Euclid (BDU), Oat Mt. (LAC & VNC), Outside Origin #1 (MVU), Moreno (MVU)1982- Duzen (SRF), Rave (LMU), Sheep’s trail (KRN), Jury (KRN), Village (RRU), Yuma (BDF)1983- Lightning #4 (FKU), Kern Co. #13, #18 (KRN)1984-Bidwell (BTU), BLM D 284,337, PNF #115, Mill Creek (TGU), China hat (MMU), fey ranch, Kern Co #10, 25,26,27, Woodrow (KRN), Salt springs, Quartz (TCU), Bonanza (BEU), Pasquel (SBC), Orco asst. (ORC), Canel (local), Rattlesnake (BDF)1985- Hidden Valley, Magic (LNU), Bald Mt. (LNU), Iron Peak (MEU), Murrer (LMU), Rock Creek (BTU), USFS #29, 33, Bluenose, Amador, 8 mile (AEU), Backbone, Panoche, Los Gatos series, Panoche (FKU), Stan #7, Falls #2 (MMU), USFS #5 (TUU), Grizzley, Gann (TCU), Bumb, Piney Creek, HUNTER LIGGETT ASST#2, Pine, Lowes, Seco, Gorda-rat, Cherry (BEU), Las pilitas, Hwy 58 #2 (SLO), Lexington, Finley (SCU), Onions, Owens (BDU), Cabazon, Gavalin, Orco, Skinner, Shell, Pala (RRU), South Mt., Wheeler, Black Mt., Ferndale, (VNC), Archibald, Parsons, Pioneer (BDU), Decker, Gleason(LAC), Gopher, Roblar, Assist #38 (MVU)1986– Knopki (SRF), USFS #10 (NEU), Galvin (RRU), Powerline (RRU), Scout, Inscription (BDU), Intake (BDF), Assist #42 (MVU), Lightning series (FKU), Yosemite #1 (YNP), USFS Asst. (BEU), Dutch Kern #30 (KRN)1987- Peach (RRU), Ave 32 (TUU), Conover (RRU), Eagle #1 (LNU), State 767 aka Bull (RRU), Denny (TUU), Dog Bar (NEU), Crank (LMU), White Deer (FKU), Briceburg (LMU), Post (RRU), Antelope (RRU), Cougar-I (SKU), Pilitas (SLU) Freaner (SHU), Fouts Complex (LNU), Slides (TGU), French (BTU), Clark (PNF), Fay/Top (SQF), Under, Flume, Bear Wallow, Gulch, Bear-1, Trinity, Jessie, friendly, Cold, Tule, Strause, China/Chance, Bear, Backbone, Doe, (SHF) Travis Complex, Blake, Longwood (SRF), River-II, Jarrell, Stanislaus Complex 14k (STF), Big, Palmer, Indian (TNF) Branham (BLM), Paul, Snag (NPS), Sycamore, Trail, Stallion Spring, Middle (KRN), SLU-864 1988- Hwy 175 (LNU), Rumsey (LNU), Shell Creek (MEU), PG&E #19 (LNU), Fields (BTU), BLM 4516, 417 (LMU), Campbell (LNF), Burney (SHF), USFS #41 (SHF), Trinity (USFS #32), State #837 (RRU), State (RRU), State (350 acres), RRU), State #1807, Orange Co. Asst (RRU), State #1825 (RRU), State #2025, Spoor (BDU), State (MVU), Tonzi (AEU), Kern co #7,9 (KRN), Stent (TCU), 1989– Rock (Plumas), Feather (LMU), Olivas (BDU), State 1116 (RRU), Concorida (RRU), Prado (RRU), Black Mt. (MVU), Vail (CNF)1990– Shipman (HUU), Lightning 379 (LMU), Mud, Dye (TGU), State 914 (RRU), Shultz (Yorba) (BDU), Bingo Rincon #3 (MVU), Dehesa #2 (MVU), SLU 1626 (SLU)1991- Church (HUU), Kutras (SHF)1992– Lincoln, Fawn (NEU), Clover, fountain (SHU), state, state 891, state, state (RRU), Aberdeen (BDU), Wildcat, Rincon (MVU), Cleveland (AEU), Dry Creek (MMU), Arroyo Seco, Slick Rock (BEU), STF #135 (TCU)1993– Hoisington (HUU), PG&E #27 (with an undetermined cause, lol), Hall (TGU), state, assist, local (RRU), Stoddard, Opal Mt., Mill Creek (BDU), Otay #18, Assist/ Old coach (MVU), Eagle (CNF), Chevron USA, Sycamore (FKU), Guerrero, Duck1994– Schindel Escape (SHU), blank (PNF), lightning #58 (LMU), Bridge (NEU), Barkley (BTU), Lightning #66 (LMU), Local (RRU), Assist #22 & #79 (SLU), Branch (SLO), Piute (BDU), Assist/ Opal#2 (BDU), Local, State, State (RRU), Gilman fire 7/24 (RRU), Highway #74 (RRU), San Felipe, Assist #42, Scissors #2 (MVU), Assist/ Opal#2 (BDU), Complex (BDF), Spanish (SBC)1995-State 1983 acres, Lost Lake, State # 1030, State (1335 acres), State (5000 acres), Jenny, City (BDU), Marron #4, Asist #51 (SLO/VNC)1996- Modoc NF 707 (Ambrose), Borrego (MVU), Assist #16 (SLU), Deep Creek (BDU), Weber (BDU), State (Wesley) 500 acres (RRU), Weaver (MMU), Wasioja (SBC/LPF), Gale (FKU), FKU 15832 (FKU), State (Wesley) 500 acres, Cabazon (RRU), State Assist (aka Bee) (RRU), Borrego, Otay #269 (MVU), Slaughter house (MVU), Oak Flat (TUU)1997- Lightning #70 (LMU), Jackrabbit (RRU), Fernandez (TUU), Assist 84 (Military AFV) (SLU), Metz #4 (BEU), Copperhead (BEU), Millstream, Correia (MMU), Fernandez (TUU)1998- Worden, Swift, PG&E 39 (MMU), Chariot, Featherstone, Wildcat, Emery, Deluz (MVU), Cajalco Santiago (RRU)1999- Musty #2,3 (BTU), Border # 95 (MVU), Andrews,

  8. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Kern County, California (2018). Kern County, CA Flood Zones [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97162-kern-county-ca-flood-zones/

Kern County, CA Flood Zones

Explore at:
csv, geodatabase, kml, mapinfo tab, shapefile, mapinfo mif, pdf, dwg, geopackage / sqliteAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Sep 13, 2018
Dataset authored and provided by
Kern County, California
Area covered
Description

This layer is a component of Geology & Geography.

Geology & Geography for Group Web Map Layer

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu