Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context: Exception handling (EH) bugs stem from incorrect usage of exception handling mechanisms (EHMs) and often incur severe consequences (e.g., system downtime, data loss, and security risk). Tracking EH bugs is particularly relevant for contemporary systems (e.g., cloud- and AI-based systems), in which the software's sophisticated logic is an additional threat to the correct use of the EHM. On top of that, bug reporters seldom can tag EH bugs --- since it may require an encompassing knowledge of the software's EH strategy. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no automated procedure to identify EH bugs from report descriptions.Objective: First, we aim to evaluate the extent to which Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to reliably label EH bugs using the text fields from bug reports (e.g., summary, description, and comments). Second, we aim to provide a reliably labeled dataset that the community can use in future endeavors. Overall, we expect our work to raise the community's awareness regarding the importance of EH bugs.Method: We manually analyzed 4,516 bug reports from the four main components of Apache’s Hadoop project, out of which we labeled ~20% (943) as EH bugs. We also labeled 2,584 non-EH bugs analyzing their bug-fixing code and creating a dataset composed of 7,100 bug reports. Then, we used word embedding techniques (Bag-of-Words and TF-IDF) to summarize the textual fields of bug reports. Subsequently, we used these embeddings to fit five classes of ML methods and evaluate them on unseen data. We also evaluated a pre-trained transformer-based model using the complete textual fields. We have also evaluated whether considering only EH keywords is enough to achieve high predictive performance.Results: Our results show that using a pre-trained DistilBERT with a linear layer trained with our proposed dataset can reasonably label EH bugs, achieving ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.88. The combination of NLP and ML traditional techniques achieved ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.74 and recall up to 0.56. As a sanity check, we also evaluate methods using embeddings extracted solely from keywords. Considering ROC-AUC as the primary concern, for the majority of ML methods tested, the analysis suggests that keywords alone are not sufficient to characterize reports of EH bugs, although this can change based on other metrics (such as recall and precision) or ML methods (e.g., Random Forest).Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the problem of automatic labeling of EH bugs. Based on our results, we can conclude that the use of ML techniques, specially transformer-base models, sounds promising to automate the task of labeling EH bugs. Overall, we hope (i) that our work will contribute towards raising awareness around EH bugs; and (ii) that our (publicly available) dataset will serve as a benchmarking dataset, paving the way for follow-up works. Additionally, our findings can be used to build tools that help maintainers flesh out EH bugs during the triage process.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global Data Labeling Solution and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $70 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by the burgeoning need for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI models. Key growth drivers include the expanding application of AI in various industries like automotive (autonomous vehicles), healthcare (medical image analysis), and financial services (fraud detection). The increasing availability of diverse data types (text, image/video, audio) further contributes to market growth. However, challenges such as the high cost of data labeling, data privacy concerns, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and execute labeling projects pose certain restraints on market expansion. Segmentation by application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, others) and data type (text, image/video, audio) reveals distinct growth trajectories within the market. The automotive and healthcare sectors currently dominate, but the government and financial services segments are showing promising growth potential. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk, Appen, and Labelbox are leading the market, leveraging their expertise in crowdsourcing, automation, and specialized data labeling solutions. However, the market shows strong potential for innovation, particularly in the development of automated data labeling tools and the expansion of services into niche areas. Regional analysis indicates strong market penetration in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and robust research and development efforts. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years fueled by rapid technological advancements and a rising demand for AI solutions. Further investment in R&D focused on automation, improved data security, and the development of more effective data labeling methodologies will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of this rapidly expanding market.
Modeling data and analysis scripts generated during the current study are available in the github repository: https://github.com/USEPA/CompTox-MIEML. RefChemDB is available for download as supplemental material from its original publication (PMID: 30570668). LINCS gene expression data are publicly available and accessible through the gene expression omnibus (GSE92742 and GSE70138) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ .
This dataset is associated with the following publication: Bundy, J., R. Judson, A. Williams, C. Grulke, I. Shah, and L. Everett. Predicting Molecular Initiating Events Using Chemical Target Annotations and Gene Expression. BioData Mining. BioMed Central Ltd, London, UK, issue}: 7, (2022).
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The data collection and labeling market is experiencing robust growth, fueled by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% over the forecast period (2025-2033), reaching approximately $75 billion by 2033. This expansion is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of AI across diverse sectors, including healthcare (medical image analysis, drug discovery), automotive (autonomous driving systems), finance (fraud detection, risk assessment), and retail (personalized recommendations, inventory management). The rising complexity of AI models and the need for more diverse and nuanced datasets are significant contributing factors to this growth. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation tools and techniques, such as active learning and synthetic data generation, are streamlining the data labeling process and making it more cost-effective. However, challenges remain. Data privacy concerns and regulations like GDPR necessitate robust data security measures, adding to the cost and complexity of data collection and labeling. The shortage of skilled data annotators also hinders market growth, necessitating investments in training and upskilling programs. Despite these restraints, the market’s inherent potential, coupled with ongoing technological advancements and increased industry investments, ensures sustained expansion in the coming years. Geographic distribution shows strong concentration in North America and Europe initially, but Asia-Pacific is poised for rapid growth due to increasing AI adoption and the availability of a large workforce. This makes strategic partnerships and global expansion crucial for market players aiming for long-term success.
https://www.nist.gov/open/licensehttps://www.nist.gov/open/license
The open dataset, software, and other files accompanying the manuscript "An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models," submitted for publication to Integrated Materials and Manufacturing Innovations. Machine learning and autonomy are increasingly prevalent in materials science, but existing models are often trained or tuned using idealized data as absolute ground truths. In actual materials science, "ground truth" is often a matter of interpretation and is more readily determined by consensus. Here we present the data, software, and other files for a study using as-obtained diffraction data as a test case for evaluating the performance of machine learning models in the presence of differing expert opinions. We demonstrate that experts with similar backgrounds can disagree greatly even for something as intuitive as using diffraction to identify the start and end of a phase transformation. We then use a logarithmic likelihood method to evaluate the performance of machine learning models in relation to the consensus expert labels and their variance. We further illustrate this method's efficacy in ranking a number of state-of-the-art phase mapping algorithms. We propose a materials data challenge centered around the problem of evaluating models based on consensus with uncertainty. The data, labels, and code used in this study are all available online at data.gov, and the interested reader is encouraged to replicate and improve the existing models or to propose alternative methods for evaluating algorithmic performance.
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The open-source data labeling tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality training data in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The market's expansion is fueled by several factors: the rising adoption of AI across various sectors (including IT, automotive, healthcare, and finance), the need for cost-effective data annotation solutions, and the inherent flexibility and customization offered by open-source tools. While cloud-based solutions currently dominate the market due to scalability and accessibility, on-premise deployments remain significant, particularly for organizations with stringent data security requirements. The market's growth is further propelled by advancements in automation and semi-supervised learning techniques within data labeling, leading to increased efficiency and reduced annotation costs. Geographic distribution shows a strong concentration in North America and Europe, reflecting the higher adoption of AI technologies in these regions; however, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a rapidly growing market due to increasing investment in AI and the availability of a large workforce for data annotation. Despite the promising outlook, certain challenges restrain market growth. The complexity of implementing and maintaining open-source tools, along with the need for specialized technical expertise, can pose barriers to entry for smaller organizations. Furthermore, the quality control and data governance aspects of open-source annotation require careful consideration. The potential for data bias and the need for robust validation processes necessitate a strategic approach to ensure data accuracy and reliability. Competition is intensifying with both established and emerging players vying for market share, forcing companies to focus on differentiation through innovation and specialized functionalities within their tools. The market is anticipated to maintain a healthy growth trajectory in the coming years, with increasing adoption across diverse sectors and geographical regions. The continued advancements in automation and the growing emphasis on data quality will be key drivers of future market expansion.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Consisting of six multi-label datasets from the UCI Machine Learning repository.
Each dataset contains missing values which have been artificially added at the following rates: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30%. The “amputation” was performed using the “Missing Completely at Random” mechanism.
File names are represented as follows:
amp_DB_MR.arff
where:
DB = original dataset;
MR = missing rate.
For more details, please read:
IEEE Access article (in review process)
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The AI Data Labeling Solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train and improve the accuracy of AI and machine learning models. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $2.5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033. This substantial growth is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of AI applications across diverse sectors like healthcare, automotive, and finance necessitates extensive data labeling. The rise of sophisticated AI algorithms that require larger and more complex datasets is another major driver. Cloud-based solutions are gaining significant traction due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of access, contributing significantly to market expansion. However, challenges remain, including data privacy concerns, the need for skilled data labelers, and the potential for bias in labeled data. These restraints need to be addressed to ensure the sustainable and responsible growth of the market. The segmentation of the market reveals a diverse landscape. Cloud-based solutions currently dominate, reflecting the industry shift toward flexible and scalable data processing. Application-wise, the IT sector is currently the largest consumer, followed by automotive and healthcare. However, growth in financial services and other sectors indicates the broadening application of AI data labeling solutions. Key players in the market are constantly innovating to improve accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, leading to a competitive and rapidly evolving market. The regional distribution shows strong market presence in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and a well-established technological infrastructure. Asia-Pacific is also demonstrating significant growth potential due to increasing technological advancements and investments in AI research and development. The forecast period of 2025-2033 presents substantial opportunities for market expansion, contingent upon addressing the challenges and leveraging emerging technologies.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The MLCommons Dollar Street Dataset is a collection of images of everyday household items from homes around the world that visually captures socioeconomic diversity of traditionally underrepresented populations. It consists of public domain data, licensed for academic, commercial and non-commercial usage, under CC-BY and CC-BY-SA 4.0. The dataset was developed because similar datasets lack socioeconomic metadata and are not representative of global diversity.
This is a subset of the original dataset that can be used for multiclass classification with 10 categories. It is designed to be used in teaching, similar to the widely used, but unlicensed CIFAR-10 dataset.
These are the preprocessing steps that were performed:
Only take examples with one imagenet_synonym label
Use only examples with the 10 most frequently occuring labels
Downscale images to 64 x 64 pixels
Split data in train and test
Store as numpy array
This is the label mapping:
Category label
day bed 0
dishrag 1
plate 2
running shoe 3
soap dispenser 4
street sign 5
table lamp 6
tile roof 7
toilet seat 8
washing machine 9
Checkout this notebook to see how the subset was created.
The original dataset was downloaded from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mlcommons/the-dollar-street-dataset. See https://mlcommons.org/datasets/dollar-street/ for more information.
TagX data annotation services are a set of tools and processes used to accurately label and classify large amounts of data for use in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The services are designed to be highly accurate, efficient, and customizable, allowing for a wide range of data types and use cases.
The process typically begins with a team of trained annotators reviewing and categorizing the data, using a variety of annotation tools and techniques, such as text classification, image annotation, and video annotation. The annotators may also use natural language processing and other advanced techniques to extract relevant information and context from the data.
Once the data has been annotated, it is then validated and checked for accuracy by a team of quality assurance specialists. Any errors or inconsistencies are corrected, and the data is then prepared for use in machine learning and AI models.
TagX annotation services can be applied to a wide range of data types, including text, images, videos, and audio. The services can be customized to meet the specific needs of each client, including the type of data, the level of annotation required, and the desired level of accuracy.
TagX data annotation services provide a powerful and efficient way to prepare large amounts of data for use in machine learning and AI applications, allowing organizations to extract valuable insights and improve their decision-making processes.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Automated classification of metadata of research data by their discipline(s) of research can be used in scientometric research, by repository service providers, and in the context of research data aggregation services. Openly available metadata of the DataCite index for research data were used to compile a large training and evaluation set comprised of 609,524 records. This publication contains aggregated data for the paper. It also contains the evaluation data of all model/hyper-parameter training and test runs.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
MLRSNet provides different perspectives of the world captured from satellites. That is, it is composed of high spatial resolution optical satellite images. MLRSNet contains 109,161 remote sensing images that are annotated into 46 categories, and the number of sample images in a category varies from 1,500 to 3,000. The images have a fixed size of 256×256 pixels with various pixel resolutions (~10m to 0.1m). Moreover, each image in the dataset is tagged with several of 60 predefined class labels, and the number of labels associated with each image varies from 1 to 13. The dataset can be used for multi-label based image classification, multi-label based image retrieval, and image segmentation.
The Dataset includes: 1. Images folder: 46 categories, 109,161 high-spatial resolution remote sensing images. 2. Labels folders: each category has a .csv file. 3. Categories_names. xlsx: Sheet1 lists the names of 46 categories, and the Sheet2 shows the associated multi-label to each category.
These images and associated binary labels were collected from collaborators across multiple universities to serve as a diverse representation of biomedical images of vessel structures, for use in the training and validation of machine learning tools for vessel segmentation. The dataset contains images from a variety of imaging modalities, at different resolutions, using difference sources of contrast and featuring different organs/ pathologies. This data was use to train, test and validated a foundational model for 3D vessel segmentation, tUbeNet, which can be found on github. The paper descripting the training and validation of the model can be found here. Filenames are structured as follows: Data - [Modality][species Organ][resolution].tif Labels - [Modality][species Organ][resolution]labels.tif Sub-volumes of larger dataset - [Modality][species Organ]_subvolume[dimensions in pixels].tif Manual labelling of blood vessels was carried out using Amira (2020.2, Thermo-Fisher, UK). Training data: opticalHREM_murineLiver_2.26x2.26x1.75um.tif: A high resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM) dataset, acquired in house by staining a healthy mouse liver with Eosin B and imaged using a standard HREM protocol. NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. CT_murineTumour_20x20x20um.tif: X-ray microCT images of a microvascular cast, taken from a subcutaneous mouse model of colorectal cancer (acquired in house). NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. RSOM_murineTumour_20x20um.tif: Raster-Scanning Optoacoustic Mesoscopy (RSOM) data from a subcutaneous tumour model (provided by Emma Brown, Bohndiek Group, University of Cambridge). The image data has undergone filtering to reduce the background (Brown et al., 2019). OCTA_humanRetina_24x24um.tif: retinal angiography data obtained using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) (provided by Dr Ranjan Rajendram, Moorfields Eye Hospital). Test data: MRI_porcineLiver_0.9x0.9x5mm.tif: T1-weighted Balanced Turbo Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data from a machine-perfused porcine liver, acquired in-house. Test Data MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_2.76x2.76x2.61um.tif: a subcutaneous colorectal tumour mouse model was imaged in house using Multi-fluorescence HREM in house, with Dylight 647 conjugated lectin staining the vasculature (Walsh et al., 2021). The image data has been processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by Walsh et al., 2020. NB: A sub-volume of 480x480x640 voxels was manually labelled (MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_subvolume480x480x640.tif). MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_0.85x0.85x0.86um.tif: an MF-HREM image of the cortex of a mouse brain, stained with Dylight-647 conjugated lectin, was acquired in house (Walsh et al., 2021). The image data has been downsampled and processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by Walsh et al., 2020. NB: A sub-volume of 1000x1000x99 voxels was manually labelled. This sub-volume is provided at full resolution and without preprocessing (MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_subvol_0.57x0.57x0.86um.tif). 2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_0.2x0.46x5.2um.tif: two-photon data of mouse olfactory bulb blood vessels, labelled with sulforhodamine 101, was kindly provided by Yuxin Zhang at the Sensory Circuits and Neurotechnology Lab, the Francis Crick Institute (Bosch et al., 2022). NB: A sub-volume of 500x500x79 voxel was manually labelled (2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_subvolume500x500x79.tif). References: Bosch, C., Ackels, T., Pacureanu, A., Zhang, Y., Peddie, C. J., Berning, M., Rzepka, N., Zdora, M. C., Whiteley, I., Storm, M., Bonnin, A., Rau, C., Margrie, T., Collinson, L., & Schaefer, A. T. (2022). Functional and multiscale 3D structural investigation of brain tissue through correlative in vivo physiology, synchrotron microtomography and volume electron microscopy. Nature Communications 2022 13:1, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30199-6 Brown, E., Brunker, J., & Bohndiek, S. E. (2019). Photoacoustic imaging as a tool to probe the tumour microenvironment. DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1242/DMM.039636 Walsh, C., Holroyd, N. A., Finnerty, E., Ryan, S. G., Sweeney, P. W., Shipley, R. J., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2021). Multifluorescence High-Resolution Episcopic Microscopy for 3D Imaging of Adult Murine Organs. Advanced Photonics Research, 2(10), 2100110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADPR.202100110 Walsh, C., Holroyd, N., Shipley, R., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2020). Asymmetric Point Spread Function Estimation and Deconvolution for Serial-Sectioning Block-Face Imaging. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1248 CCIS, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52791-4_19
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The global Label Classifier market size is estimated to be valued at USD XXX million in 2025 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2033. Rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in various industries, increasing demand for data annotation and classification, and growing need for efficient and accurate data labeling are major factors driving the growth of the market. The market is segmented by application, type, and region. By application, the market is categorized into SMEs and large enterprises. By type, the market is classified into rule-based classifiers, statistical-based classifiers, and machine learning (ML)-based classifiers. ML-based classifiers hold the largest market share due to their high accuracy, flexibility, and ability to handle complex data sets. By region, North America dominates the market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. Growing adoption of AI and ML in the IT and healthcare sectors, increasing demand for labeled data for training ML models, and presence of major market players in North America contribute to its leading position.
LandCoverNet is a global annual land cover classification training dataset with labels for the multi-spectral satellite imagery from Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 missions in 2018. LandCoverNet Asia contains data across Asia, which accounts for ~31% of the global dataset. Each pixel is identified as one of the seven land cover classes based on its annual time series. These classes are water, natural bare ground, artificial bare ground, woody vegetation, cultivated vegetation, (semi) natural vegetation, and permanent snow/ice.
There are a total of 2753 image chips of 256 x 256 pixels in LandCoverNet South America V1.0 spanning 92 tiles. Each image chip contains temporal observations from the following satellite products with an annual class label, all stored in raster format (GeoTIFF files):
* Sentinel-1 ground range distance (GRD) with radiometric calibration and orthorectification at 10m spatial resolution
* Sentinel-2 surface reflectance product (L2A) at 10m spatial resolution
* Landsat-8 surface reflectance product from Collection 2 Level-2
Radiant Earth Foundation designed and generated this dataset with a grant from Schmidt Futures with additional support from NASA ACCESS, Microsoft AI for Earth and in kind technology support from Sinergise.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The market for Cloud-Based Enterprise Labeling Software is projected to grow from $411 million in 2025 to $1.2 billion by 2033, at a CAGR of 14.1%. The growth of this market is attributed to various factors, including the increasing need for efficient and accurate product labeling, the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions across industries, and the growing demand for customized and personalized packaging. The healthcare, food and beverage, and manufacturing industries are among the key end-users of cloud-based enterprise labeling software, and the demand from these sectors is expected to continue driving market growth. North America and Europe are the dominant regions in the cloud-based enterprise labeling software market, with a combined share of over 65% in 2025. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth in the coming years, with a CAGR of 16.5% from 2025 to 2033. Key trends in the market include the adoption of SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) models, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies, and the growing demand for cloud-based enterprise labeling software for label compliance and regulatory purposes. Cloud-based enterprise labeling software is projected to reach $5 million by 2026, driven by the increasing demand for supply chain visibility and efficiency. This software enables businesses to streamline the process of creating, managing, and tracking labels, which are essential for product identification and compliance.
LandCoverNet is a global annual land cover classification training dataset with labels for the multi-spectral satellite imagery from Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 missions in 2018. LandCoverNet North America contains data across North America, which accounts for ~13% of the global dataset. Each pixel is identified as one of the seven land cover classes based on its annual time series. These classes are water, natural bare ground, artificial bare ground, woody vegetation, cultivated vegetation, (semi) natural vegetation, and permanent snow/ice.
There are a total of 1561 image chips of 256 x 256 pixels in LandCoverNet North America V1.0 spanning 40 tiles. Each image chip contains temporal observations from the following satellite products with an annual class label, all stored in raster format (GeoTIFF files):
* Sentinel-1 ground range distance (GRD) with radiometric calibration and orthorectification at 10m spatial resolution
* Sentinel-2 surface reflectance product (L2A) at 10m spatial resolution
* Landsat-8 surface reflectance product from Collection 2 Level-2
Radiant Earth Foundation designed and generated this dataset with a grant from Schmidt Futures with additional support from NASA ACCESS, Microsoft AI for Earth and in kind technology support from Sinergise.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global image data labeling services market is projected to reach a value of USD 20.59 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 16.7% from 2025 to 2033. The growth of the market is attributed to the increasing demand for image data labeling services from various industries such as AI, autonomous vehicles, healthcare, and retail. The market is segmented based on application into IT, automotive, healthcare, financial, and others. Among these, the IT segment is expected to hold the largest market share during the forecast period. Key market drivers include the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms, increasing demand for autonomous vehicles, and the need for accurate and high-quality labeled data for training AI models. The market is also expected to benefit from advancements in deep learning and computer vision technologies. However, factors such as data privacy concerns and the availability of low-cost alternatives may restrain the growth of the market to some extent. Some of the major companies operating in the image data labeling services market include Uber Technology Inc., Appen, BasicFinder, DataTurks, and Cloud Factory Limited.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains tile imagery from the OpenStreetMap project alongside label masks for buildings from OpenStreetMap. Besides the original clean label set, additional noisy label sets for random noise, removed and added buildings are provided.
The purpose of this dataset is to provide training data for analysing the impact of noisy labels on the performance of models for semantic segmentation in Earth observation.
The code for downloading and creating the datasets as well as for performing some preliminary analyses is also provided, however it is necessary to have access to a tile server where OpenStreetMap tiles can be downloaded in sufficient amounts.
To reproduce the dataset and perform analysis on it, do the following:
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The AI data labeling solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train and improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of AI applications across diverse sectors, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, necessitates vast amounts of labeled data. Cloud-based solutions are gaining prominence due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation techniques and the emergence of specialized AI data labeling platforms are contributing to market expansion. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns, the need for highly skilled professionals, and the complexities of handling diverse data formats continue to restrain market growth to some extent. The market segmentation reveals that the cloud-based solutions segment is expected to dominate due to its inherent advantages over on-premise solutions. In terms of application, the automotive sector is projected to exhibit the fastest growth, driven by the increasing adoption of autonomous driving technology and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). The healthcare industry is also a major contributor, with the rise of AI-powered diagnostic tools and personalized medicine driving demand for accurate medical image and data labeling. Geographically, North America currently holds a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is poised for rapid growth owing to increasing investments in AI and technological advancements. The competitive landscape is marked by a diverse range of established players and emerging startups, fostering innovation and competition within the market. The continued evolution of AI and its integration across various industries ensures the continued expansion of the AI data labeling solution market in the coming years.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context: Exception handling (EH) bugs stem from incorrect usage of exception handling mechanisms (EHMs) and often incur severe consequences (e.g., system downtime, data loss, and security risk). Tracking EH bugs is particularly relevant for contemporary systems (e.g., cloud- and AI-based systems), in which the software's sophisticated logic is an additional threat to the correct use of the EHM. On top of that, bug reporters seldom can tag EH bugs --- since it may require an encompassing knowledge of the software's EH strategy. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no automated procedure to identify EH bugs from report descriptions.Objective: First, we aim to evaluate the extent to which Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to reliably label EH bugs using the text fields from bug reports (e.g., summary, description, and comments). Second, we aim to provide a reliably labeled dataset that the community can use in future endeavors. Overall, we expect our work to raise the community's awareness regarding the importance of EH bugs.Method: We manually analyzed 4,516 bug reports from the four main components of Apache’s Hadoop project, out of which we labeled ~20% (943) as EH bugs. We also labeled 2,584 non-EH bugs analyzing their bug-fixing code and creating a dataset composed of 7,100 bug reports. Then, we used word embedding techniques (Bag-of-Words and TF-IDF) to summarize the textual fields of bug reports. Subsequently, we used these embeddings to fit five classes of ML methods and evaluate them on unseen data. We also evaluated a pre-trained transformer-based model using the complete textual fields. We have also evaluated whether considering only EH keywords is enough to achieve high predictive performance.Results: Our results show that using a pre-trained DistilBERT with a linear layer trained with our proposed dataset can reasonably label EH bugs, achieving ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.88. The combination of NLP and ML traditional techniques achieved ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.74 and recall up to 0.56. As a sanity check, we also evaluate methods using embeddings extracted solely from keywords. Considering ROC-AUC as the primary concern, for the majority of ML methods tested, the analysis suggests that keywords alone are not sufficient to characterize reports of EH bugs, although this can change based on other metrics (such as recall and precision) or ML methods (e.g., Random Forest).Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the problem of automatic labeling of EH bugs. Based on our results, we can conclude that the use of ML techniques, specially transformer-base models, sounds promising to automate the task of labeling EH bugs. Overall, we hope (i) that our work will contribute towards raising awareness around EH bugs; and (ii) that our (publicly available) dataset will serve as a benchmarking dataset, paving the way for follow-up works. Additionally, our findings can be used to build tools that help maintainers flesh out EH bugs during the triage process.