Data Labeling Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global data labeling market size reached USD 3.2 billion in 2024, driven by the explosive growth in artificial intelligence and machine learning applications across industries. The market is poised to expand at a CAGR of 22.8% from 2025 to 2033, and is forecasted to reach USD 25.3 billion by 2033. This robust growth is primarily fueled by the increasing demand for high-quality annotated data to train advanced AI models, the proliferation of automation in business processes, and the rising adoption of data-driven decision-making frameworks in both the public and private sectors.

One of the principal growth drivers for the data labeling market is the accelerating integration of AI and machine learning technologies across various industries, including healthcare, automotive, retail, and BFSI. As organizations strive to leverage AI for enhanced customer experiences, predictive analytics, and operational efficiency, the need for accurately labeled datasets has become paramount. Data labeling ensures that AI algorithms can learn from well-annotated examples, thereby improving model accuracy and reliability. The surge in demand for computer vision applications—such as facial recognition, autonomous vehicles, and medical imaging—has particularly heightened the need for image and video data labeling, further propelling market growth.

Another significant factor contributing to the expansion of the data labeling market is the rapid digitization of business processes and the exponential growth in unstructured data. Enterprises are increasingly investing in data annotation tools and platforms to extract actionable insights from large volumes of text, audio, and video data. The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the widespread adoption of cloud computing have further amplified data generation, necessitating scalable and efficient data labeling solutions. Additionally, the rise of semi-automated and automated labeling technologies, powered by AI-assisted tools, is reducing manual effort and accelerating the annotation process, thereby enabling organizations to meet the growing demand for labeled data at scale.

The evolving regulatory landscape and the emphasis on data privacy and security are also playing a crucial role in shaping the data labeling market. As governments worldwide introduce stringent data protection regulations, organizations are turning to specialized data labeling service providers that adhere to compliance standards. This trend is particularly pronounced in sectors such as healthcare and BFSI, where the accuracy and confidentiality of labeled data are critical. Furthermore, the increasing outsourcing of data labeling tasks to specialized vendors in emerging economies is enabling organizations to access skilled labor at lower costs, further fueling market expansion.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the data labeling market, followed by Europe and the Asia Pacific. The presence of major technology companies, robust investments in AI research, and the early adoption of advanced analytics solutions have positioned North America as the market leader. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, driven by the rapid digital transformation in countries like China, India, and Japan. The growing focus on AI innovation, government initiatives to promote digitalization, and the availability of a large pool of skilled annotators are key factors contributing to the regionÂ’s impressive growth trajectory.

In the realm of security, Video Dataset Labeling for Security has emerged as a critical application area within the data labeling market. As surveillance systems become more sophisticated, the need for accurately labeled video data is paramount to ensure the effectiveness of security measures. Video dataset labeling involves annotating video frames to identify and track objects, behaviors, and anomalies, which are essential for developing intelligent security systems capable of real-time threat detection and response. This process not only enhances the accuracy of security algorithms but also aids in the training of AI models that can predict and prevent potential security breaches. The growing emphasis on public safety and

Sure! I'd be happy to provide you with an introduction to machine learning basics for beginners. Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that focuses on enabling computers to learn and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. Here are some key concepts and terms to help you get started:

1. Supervised Learning: In supervised learning, the machine learning algorithm learns from labeled training data. The training data consists of input examples and their corresponding correct output or target values. The algorithm learns to generalize from this data and make predictions or classify new, unseen examples.

2. Unsupervised Learning: Unsupervised learning involves learning patterns and relationships from unlabeled data. Unlike supervised learning, there are no target values provided. Instead, the algorithm aims to discover inherent structures or clusters in the data.

3. Training Data and Test Data: Machine learning models require a dataset to learn from. The dataset is typically split into two parts: the training data and the test data. The model learns from the training data, and the test data is used to evaluate its performance and generalization ability.

4. Features and Labels: In supervised learning, the input examples are often represented by features or attributes. For example, in a spam email classification task, features might include the presence of certain keywords or the length of the email. The corresponding output or target values are called labels, indicating the class or category to which the example belongs (e.g., spam or not spam).

5. Model Evaluation Metrics: To assess the performance of a machine learning model, various evaluation metrics are used. Common metrics include accuracy (the proportion of correctly predicted examples), precision (the proportion of true positives among all positive predictions), recall (the proportion of true positives predicted correctly), and F1 score (a combination of precision and recall).

6. Overfitting and Underfitting: Overfitting occurs when a model becomes too complex and learns to memorize the training data instead of generalizing well to unseen examples. On the other hand, underfitting happens when a model is too simple and fails to capture the underlying patterns in the data. Balancing the complexity of the model is crucial to achieve good generalization.

7. Feature Engineering: Feature engineering involves selecting or creating relevant features that can help improve the performance of a machine learning model. It often requires domain knowledge and creativity to transform raw data into a suitable representation that captures the important information.

8. Bias and Variance Trade-off: The bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept in machine learning. Bias refers to the errors introduced by the model's assumptions and simplifications, while variance refers to the model's sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training data. Reducing bias may increase variance and vice versa. Finding the right balance is important for building a well-performing model.

9. Supervised Learning Algorithms: There are various supervised learning algorithms, including linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and neural networks. Each algorithm has its own strengths, weaknesses, and specific use cases.

10. Unsupervised Learning Algorithms: Unsupervised learning algorithms include clustering algorithms like k-means clustering and hierarchical clustering, dimensionality reduction techniques like principal component analysis (PCA) and t-SNE, and anomaly detection algorithms, among others.

These concepts provide a starting point for understanding the basics of machine learning. As you delve deeper, you can explore more advanced topics such as deep learning, reinforcement learning, and natural language processing. Remember to practice hands-on with real-world datasets to gain practical experience and further refine your skills.

1. Overview We provide various types of Annotated Imagery Data annotation services, including:
2. Bounding box
3. Polygon
4. Segmentation
5. Polyline
6. Key points
7. Image classification
8. Image description ...
9. Our Capacity
10. Platform: Our platform supports human-machine interaction and semi-automatic labeling, increasing labeling efficiency by more than 30% per annotator.It has successfully been applied to nearly 5,000 projects.

• Annotation Tools: Nexdata's platform integrates 30 sets of annotation templates, covering audio, image, video, point cloud and text.

-Secure Implementation: NDA is signed to gurantee secure implementation and Annotated Imagery Data is destroyed upon delivery.

-Quality: Multiple rounds of quality inspections ensures high quality data output, certified with ISO9001

1. About Nexdata Nexdata has global data processing centers and more than 20,000 professional annotators, supporting on-demand data annotation services, such as speech, image, video, point cloud and Natural Language Processing (NLP) Data, etc. Please visit us at https://www.nexdata.ai/computerVisionTraining?source=Datarade

Data Labeling Platform Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global data labeling platform market size is valued at USD 2.4 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.1% projected through the forecast period. By 2033, the market is expected to reach a substantial USD 16.7 billion, driven primarily by the exponential rise in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications across various industries. This growth is fueled by the critical need for high-quality, annotated data to train increasingly sophisticated AI models, making data labeling platforms indispensable to organizations aiming for digital transformation and automation.

One of the principal growth factors of the data labeling platform market is the surging demand for AI-powered solutions in sectors such as healthcare, automotive, finance, and retail. As AI models become more pervasive, the need for accurately labeled datasets grows in parallel, given that the success of AI applications hinges on the quality of their training data. The proliferation of autonomous vehicles, smart healthcare diagnostics, and intelligent recommendation systems is intensifying the requirement for well-annotated data, thus propelling the adoption of advanced data labeling platforms. Additionally, the increasing complexity and diversity of data types, such as images, videos, audio, and text, are necessitating more versatile and scalable labeling solutions, further accelerating market expansion.

Another significant growth driver is the shift toward cloud-based data labeling platforms, which offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency. Cloud deployment enables organizations to manage large-scale annotation projects with distributed teams, leveraging AI-assisted labeling tools and real-time collaboration. This shift is particularly appealing to enterprises with global operations, as it allows seamless access to data and labeling resources regardless of geographical constraints. Furthermore, the integration of automation and machine learning within labeling platforms is reducing manual effort, improving accuracy, and expediting project timelines. These technological advancements are making data labeling platforms more accessible and attractive to a broader range of enterprises, from startups to large corporations.

The rising trend of outsourcing data annotation tasks to specialized service providers is also playing a pivotal role in market growth. As organizations strive to focus on their core competencies, many are turning to third-party vendors for data labeling services. These vendors offer expertise in handling diverse data types and ensure compliance with data privacy regulations, which is especially critical in sectors like healthcare and finance. The growing ecosystem of data labeling service providers is fostering innovation and competition, resulting in improved quality, faster turnaround times, and competitive pricing. This trend is expected to continue, further stimulating the growth of the data labeling platform market in the coming years.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the global data labeling platform market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. The region's dominance is attributed to the presence of major technology companies, early adoption of AI and ML, and significant investments in research and development. Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding AI initiatives, and increasing government support for technology-driven innovation. Europe also holds a notable share, driven by stringent data privacy regulations and the growing emphasis on ethical AI development. The Latin America and Middle East & Africa regions are witnessing steady growth, albeit from a smaller base, as enterprises in these regions gradually embrace AI-driven solutions and invest in data infrastructure.

Component Analysis

The component seg

APISCRAPY's AI & ML training data is meticulously curated and labelled to ensure the best quality. Our training data comes from a variety of areas, including healthcare and banking, as well as e-commerce and natural language processing.

The present is a manually labeled data set for the task of Event Detection (ED). The task of ED consists of identifying event triggers, the word that most clearly indicates the occurrence of an event. The present data set consists of 2,200 news extracts from The New York Times (NYT) Annotated Corpus, separated into training (2,000) and testing (200) sets. Each news extract contains the plain text with the labels (event mentions), along with two metadata (publication date and an identifier). Labels description: We consider as event any ongoing real-world event or situation reported in the news articles. It is important to distinguish those events and situations that are in progress (or are reported as fresh events) at the moment the news is delivered from past events that are simply brought back, future events, hypothetical events, or events that will not take place. In our data set we only labeled as event the first type of event. Based on this criterion, some words that are typically considered as events are labeled as non-event triggers if they do not refer to ongoing events at the time the analyzed news is released. Take for instance the following news extract: "devaluation is not a realistic option to the current account deficit since it would only contribute to weakening the credibility of economic policies as it did during the last crisis." The only word that is labeled as event trigger in this example is "deficit" because it is the only ongoing event refereed in the news. Note that the words "devaluation", "weakening" and "crisis" could be labeled as event triggers in other news extracts, where the context of use of these words is different, but not in the given example. Further information: For a more detailed description of the data set and the data collection process please visit: https://cs.uns.edu.ar/~mmaisonnave/resources/ED_data. Data format: The dataset is split in two folders: training and testing. The first folder contains 2,000 XML files. The second folder contains 200 XML files. Each XML file has the following format. YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS ... ... ... The first three tags (pubdate, file-id and sent-idx) contain metadata information. The first one is the publication date of the news article that contained that text extract. The next two tags represent a unique identifier for the text extract. The file-id uniquely identifies a news article, that can hold several text extracts. The second one is the index that identifies that text extract inside the full article. The last tag (sentence) defines the beginning and end of the text extract. Inside that text are the tags. Each of these tags surrounds one word that was manually labeled as an event trigger.

The datasets contain pixel-level hyperspectral data of six snow and glacier classes. They have been extracted from a Hyperspectral image. The dataset "data.csv" has 5417 * 142 samples belonging to the classes: Clean snow, Dirty ice, Firn, Glacial ice, Ice mixed debris, and Water body. The dataset "_labels1.csv" has corresponding labels of the "data.csv" file. The dataset "RGB.csv" has only 5417 * 3 samples. There are only three band values in this file while "data.csv" has 142 band values.

Snapshot img

Data Labeling And Annotation Tools Market Size 2025-2029

The data labeling and annotation tools market size is valued to increase USD 2.69 billion, at a CAGR of 28% from 2024 to 2029. Explosive growth and data demands of generative AI will drive the data labeling and annotation tools market.

Major Market Trends & Insights

North America dominated the market and accounted for a 47% growth during the forecast period.
By Type - Text segment was valued at USD 193.50 billion in 2023
By Technique - Manual labeling segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023

Market Size & Forecast

Market Opportunities: USD 651.30 billion
Market Future Opportunities: USD USD 2.69 billion 
CAGR : 28%
North America: Largest market in 2023

Market Summary

The market is a dynamic and ever-evolving landscape that plays a crucial role in powering advanced technologies, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). Core technologies, such as deep learning and machine learning, continue to fuel the demand for data labeling and annotation tools, enabling the explosive growth and data demands of generative AI. These tools facilitate the emergence of specialized platforms for generative AI data pipelines, ensuring the maintenance of data quality and managing escalating complexity. Applications of data labeling and annotation tools span various industries, including healthcare, finance, and retail, with the market expected to grow significantly in the coming years. According to recent studies, the market share for data labeling and annotation tools is projected to reach over 30% by 2026. Service types or product categories, such as manual annotation, automated annotation, and semi-automated annotation, cater to the diverse needs of businesses and organizations. Regulations, such as GDPR and HIPAA, pose challenges for the market, requiring stringent data security and privacy measures. Regional mentions, including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, exhibit varying growth patterns, with Asia Pacific expected to witness the fastest growth due to the increasing adoption of AI technologies. The market continues to unfold, offering numerous opportunities for innovation and growth.

What will be the Size of the Data Labeling And Annotation Tools Market during the forecast period?

Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

How is the Data Labeling And Annotation Tools Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?

The data labeling and annotation tools industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. TypeTextVideoImageAudioTechniqueManual labelingSemi-supervised labelingAutomatic labelingDeploymentCloud-basedOn-premisesGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaMexicoEuropeFranceGermanyItalySpainUKAPACChinaSouth AmericaBrazilRest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The text segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market is witnessing significant growth, fueled by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. According to recent studies, the market for data labeling and annotation services is projected to expand by 25% in the upcoming year. This expansion is primarily driven by the burgeoning demand for high-quality, accurately labeled datasets to train advanced AI and ML models. Scalable annotation workflows are essential to meeting the demands of large-scale projects, enabling efficient labeling and review processes. Data labeling platforms offer various features, such as error detection mechanisms, active learning strategies, and polygon annotation software, to ensure annotation accuracy. These tools are integral to the development of image classification models and the comparison of annotation tools. Video annotation services are gaining popularity, as they cater to the unique challenges of video data. Data labeling pipelines and project management tools streamline the entire annotation process, from initial data preparation to final output. Keypoint annotation workflows and annotation speed optimization techniques further enhance the efficiency of annotation projects. Inter-annotator agreement is a critical metric in ensuring data labeling quality. The data labeling lifecycle encompasses various stages, including labeling, assessment, and validation, to maintain the highest level of accuracy. Semantic segmentation tools and label accuracy assessment methods contribute to the ongoing refinement of annotation techniques. Text annotation techniques, such as named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and text classification, are essential for natural language processing. Consistency checks an

These four labeled data sets are targeted at ordinal quantification. The goal of quantification is not to predict the label of each individual instance, but the distribution of labels in unlabeled sets of data.

With the scripts provided, you can extract CSV files from the UCI machine learning repository and from OpenML. The ordinal class labels stem from a binning of a continuous regression label.

We complement this data set with the indices of data items that appear in each sample of our evaluation. Hence, you can precisely replicate our samples by drawing the specified data items. The indices stem from two evaluation protocols that are well suited for ordinal quantification. To this end, each row in the files app_val_indices.csv, app_tst_indices.csv, app-oq_val_indices.csv, and app-oq_tst_indices.csv represents one sample.

Our first protocol is the artificial prevalence protocol (APP), where all possible distributions of labels are drawn with an equal probability. The second protocol, APP-OQ, is a variant thereof, where only the smoothest 20% of all APP samples are considered. This variant is targeted at ordinal quantification tasks, where classes are ordered and a similarity of neighboring classes can be assumed.

Usage

You can extract four CSV files through the provided script extract-oq.jl, which is conveniently wrapped in a Makefile. The Project.toml and Manifest.toml specify the Julia package dependencies, similar to a requirements file in Python.

Preliminaries: You have to have a working Julia installation. We have used Julia v1.6.5 in our experiments.

Data Extraction: In your terminal, you can call either

make

(recommended), or

julia --project="." --eval "using Pkg; Pkg.instantiate()"
julia --project="." extract-oq.jl

Outcome: The first row in each CSV file is the header. The first column, named "class_label", is the ordinal class.

Further Reading

Implementation of our experiments: https://github.com/mirkobunse/regularized-oq

Data Labeling with LLMs Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Data Labeling with LLMs market size was valued at USD 2.14 billion in 2024, with a robust year-on-year growth trajectory. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 22.8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a forecasted value of USD 16.6 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) to automate and enhance the efficiency of data labeling processes across various industries. As organizations continue to invest in AI and machine learning, the demand for high-quality, accurately labeled datasets—essential for training and fine-tuning LLMs—continues to surge, fueling the expansion of the data labeling with LLMs market.

One of the principal growth factors for the data labeling with LLMs market is the exponential increase in the volume of unstructured data generated by businesses and consumers worldwide. Organizations are leveraging LLMs to automate the labeling of vast datasets, which is essential for training sophisticated AI models. The integration of LLMs into data labeling workflows is not only improving the speed and accuracy of the annotation process but also reducing operational costs. This technological advancement has enabled enterprises to scale their AI initiatives more efficiently, facilitating the deployment of intelligent applications across sectors such as healthcare, automotive, finance, and retail. Moreover, the continuous evolution of LLMs, with capabilities such as zero-shot and few-shot learning, is further enhancing the quality and context-awareness of labeled data, making these solutions indispensable for next-generation AI systems.

Another significant driver is the growing need for domain-specific labeled datasets, especially in highly regulated industries like healthcare and finance. In these sectors, data privacy and security are paramount, and the use of LLMs in data labeling processes ensures that sensitive information is handled with the utmost care. LLM-powered platforms are increasingly being adopted to create high-quality, compliant datasets for applications such as medical imaging analysis, fraud detection, and customer sentiment analysis. The ability of LLMs to understand context, semantics, and complex language structures is particularly valuable in these domains, where the accuracy and reliability of labeled data directly impact the performance and safety of AI-driven solutions. This trend is expected to continue as organizations strive to meet stringent regulatory requirements while accelerating their AI adoption.

Furthermore, the proliferation of AI-powered applications in emerging markets is contributing to the rapid expansion of the data labeling with LLMs market. Countries in Asia Pacific and Latin America are witnessing significant investments in digital transformation, driving the demand for scalable and efficient data annotation solutions. The availability of cloud-based data labeling platforms, combined with advancements in LLM technologies, is enabling organizations in these regions to overcome traditional barriers such as limited access to skilled annotators and high operational costs. As a result, the market is experiencing robust growth in both developed and developing economies, with enterprises increasingly recognizing the strategic value of high-quality labeled data in gaining a competitive edge.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the data labeling with LLMs market, accounting for the largest share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the presence of major technology companies, advanced research institutions, and a mature AI ecosystem. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period, driven by rapid digitalization, government initiatives supporting AI development, and a burgeoning startup ecosystem. Europe is also emerging as a key market, with strong demand from sectors such as automotive and healthcare. Meanwhile, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually increasing their market presence, supported by growing investments in AI infrastructure and talent development.

Supervised machine learning methods are increasingly employed in political science. Such models require costly manual labeling of documents. In this paper we introduce active learning, a framework in which data to be labeled by human coders are not chosen at random but rather targeted in such a way that the required amount of data to train a machine learning model can be minimized. We study the benefits of active learning using text data examples. We perform simulation studies that illustrate conditions where active learning can reduce the cost of labeling text data. We perform these simulations on three corpora that vary in size, document length and domain. We find that in cases where the document class of interest is not balanced, researchers can label a fraction of the documents one would need using random sampling (or `passive' learning) to achieve equally performing classifiers. We further investigate how varying levels of inter-coder reliability affect the active learning procedures and find that even with low-reliability active learning performs more efficiently than does random sampling.

We present Code4ML: a Large-scale Dataset of annotated Machine Learning Code, a corpus of Python code snippets, competition summaries, and data descriptions from Kaggle.

The data is organized in a table structure. Code4ML includes several main objects: competitions information, raw code blocks collected form Kaggle and manually marked up snippets. Each table has a .csv format.

Each competition has the text description and metadata, reflecting competition and used dataset characteristics as well as evaluation metrics (competitions.csv). The corresponding datasets can be loaded using Kaggle API and data sources.

The code blocks themselves and their metadata are collected to the data frames concerning the publishing year of the initial kernels. The current version of the corpus includes two code blocks files: snippets from kernels up to the 2020 year (сode_blocks_upto_20.csv) and those from the 2021 year (сode_blocks_21.csv) with corresponding metadata. The corpus consists of 2 743 615 ML code blocks collected from 107 524 Jupyter notebooks.

Marked up code blocks have the following metadata: anonymized id, the format of the used data (for example, table or audio), the id of the semantic type, a flag for the code errors, the estimated relevance to the semantic class (from 1 to 5), the id of the parent notebook, and the name of the competition. The current version of the corpus has ~12 000 labeled snippets (markup_data_20220415.csv).

As marked up code blocks data contains the numeric id of the code block semantic type, we also provide a mapping from this number to semantic type and subclass (actual_graph_2022-06-01.csv).

The dataset can help solve various problems, including code synthesis from a prompt in natural language, code autocompletion, and semantic code classification.

Snapshot img { margin: 10px !important; } Generative AI In Data Labeling Solution And Services Market Size 2025-2029

The generative ai in data labeling solution and services market size is forecast to increase by USD 31.7 billion, at a CAGR of 24.2% between 2024 and 2029.

The global generative AI in data labeling solution and services market is shaped by the escalating demand for high-quality, large-scale datasets. Traditional manual data labeling methods create a significant bottleneck in the ai development lifecycle, which is addressed by the proliferation of synthetic data generation for robust model training. This strategic shift allows organizations to create limitless volumes of perfectly labeled data on demand, covering a comprehensive spectrum of scenarios. This capability is particularly transformative for generative ai in automotive applications and in the development of data labeling and annotation tools, enabling more resilient and accurate systems.However, a paramount challenge confronting the market is ensuring accuracy, quality control, and mitigation of inherent model bias. Generative models can produce plausible but incorrect labels, a phenomenon known as hallucination, which can introduce systemic errors into training datasets. This makes ai in data quality a critical concern, necessitating robust human-in-the-loop verification processes to maintain the integrity of generative ai in healthcare data. The market's long-term viability depends on developing sophisticated frameworks for bias detection and creating reliable generative artificial intelligence (AI) that can be trusted for foundational tasks.

What will be the Size of the Generative AI In Data Labeling Solution And Services Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data with forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The global generative AI in data labeling solution and services market is witnessing a transformation driven by advancements in generative adversarial networks and diffusion models. These techniques are central to synthetic data generation, augmenting AI model training data and redefining the machine learning pipeline. This evolution supports a move toward more sophisticated data-centric AI workflows, which integrate automated data labeling with human-in-the-loop annotation for enhanced accuracy. The scope of application is broadening from simple text-based data annotation to complex image-based data annotation and audio-based data annotation, creating a demand for robust multimodal data labeling capabilities. This shift across the AI development lifecycle is significant, with projections indicating a 35% rise in the use of AI-assisted labeling for specialized computer vision systems.Building upon this foundation, the focus intensifies on annotation quality control and AI-powered quality assurance within modern data annotation platforms. Methods like zero-shot learning and few-shot learning are becoming more viable, reducing dependency on massive datasets. The process of foundation model fine-tuning is increasingly guided by reinforcement learning from human feedback, ensuring outputs align with specific operational needs. Key considerations such as model bias mitigation and data privacy compliance are being addressed through AI-assisted labeling and semi-supervised learning. This impacts diverse sectors, from medical imaging analysis and predictive maintenance models to securing network traffic patterns against cybersecurity threat signatures and improving autonomous vehicle sensors for robotics training simulation and smart city solutions.

How is this Generative AI In Data Labeling Solution And Services Market segmented?

The generative ai in data labeling solution and services market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in "USD million" for the period 2025-2029,for the following segments. End-userIT dataHealthcareRetailFinancial servicesOthersTypeSemi-supervisedAutomaticManualProductImage or video basedText basedAudio basedGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaMexicoAPACChinaIndiaSouth KoreaJapanAustraliaIndonesiaEuropeGermanyUKFranceItalyThe NetherlandsSpainSouth AmericaBrazilArgentinaColombiaMiddle East and AfricaSouth AfricaUAETurkeyRest of World (ROW)

By End-user Insights

The it data segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

In the IT data segment, generative AI is transforming the creation of training data for software development, cybersecurity, and network management. It addresses the need for realistic, non-sensitive data at scale by producing synthetic code, structured log files, and diverse threat signatures. This is crucial for training AI-powered developer tools and intrusion detection systems. With South America representing an 8.1% market opportunity, the demand for localized and specia

Context

STL-10 is an image recognition dataset inspired by CIFAR-10 dataset with some improvements. With a corpus of 100,000 unlabeled images and 500 training images, this dataset is best for developing unsupervised feature learning, deep learning, self-taught learning algorithms. Unlike CIFAR-10, the dataset has a higher resolution which makes it a challenging benchmark for developing more scalable unsupervised learning methods.

Content

Data overview:

• There are three files: train_image.zips, test_images.zip and unlabeled_images.zip
• 10 classes: airplane, bird, car, cat, deer, dog, horse, monkey, ship, truck
• Images are 96x96 pixels, color
• 500 training images (10 pre-defined folds), 800 test images per class
• 100,000 unlabeled images for unsupervised learning. These examples are extracted from a similar but broader distribution of images. For instance, it contains other types of animals (bears, rabbits, etc.) and vehicles (trains, buses, etc.) in addition to the ones in the labeled set
• Images were acquired from labeled examples on ImageNet

The original data source recommends the following standardized testing protocol for reporting results:

1. Perform unsupervised training on the unlabeled data
2. Perform supervised training on the labeled data using 10 (pre-defined) folds of 100 examples from the training data. The indices of the examples to be used for each fold are provided
3. Report average accuracy on the full test set

Acknowledgements

Original data source and banner image: https://cs.stanford.edu/~acoates/stl10/

Please cite the following reference when using this dataset:

Adam Coates, Honglak Lee, Andrew Y. Ng An Analysis of Single Layer Networks in Unsupervised Feature Learning AISTATS, 2011.

Inspiration

• Can you train a model to accurately identify what animal or transportation object is in each image?

Coast Train is a library of images of coastal environments, annotations, and corresponding thematic label masks (or ‘label images’) collated for the purposes of training and evaluating machine learning (ML), deep learning, and other models for image segmentation. It includes image sets from both geospatial satellite, aerial, and UAV imagery and orthomosaics, as well as non-geospatial oblique and nadir imagery. Images include a diverse range of coastal environments from the U.S. Pacific, Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, and Great Lakes coastlines, consisting of time-series of high-resolution (≤1m) orthomosaics and satellite image tiles (10–30m). Each image, image annotation, and labelled image is available as a single NPZ zipped file. NPZ files follow the following naming convention: {datasource}_{numberofclasses}_{threedigitdatasetversion}.zip, where {datasource} is the source of the original images (for example, NAIP, Landsat 8, Sentinel 2), {numberofclasses} is the number of classes us ...

Labeling Data Governance for Warehouses Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global labeling data governance for warehouses market size reached USD 1.78 billion in 2024, with a robust year-on-year growth trajectory. The market is forecasted to expand at a CAGR of 17.2% from 2025 to 2033, propelling the market size to approximately USD 7.21 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for accurate, compliant, and efficient data labeling solutions within warehouse operations, as enterprises across sectors recognize the value of data governance in optimizing inventory, quality, and supply chains. As per our latest research, the market is witnessing a rapid shift towards digital transformation, particularly in the context of Industry 4.0, which is further accelerating the adoption of advanced data governance tools and strategies in warehouse environments.

One of the primary growth factors in the labeling data governance for warehouses market is the rising complexity of warehouse operations, fueled by the proliferation of e-commerce, omnichannel retailing, and globalized supply chains. As warehouses become central hubs for distribution, inventory management, and order fulfillment, the need for precise and standardized labeling processes has never been more critical. Data governance ensures that all labeling activities are consistent, traceable, and compliant with both internal policies and external regulations. This is especially important for sectors such as food & beverage, healthcare, and logistics, where labeling accuracy directly impacts product safety, traceability, and customer satisfaction. The integration of advanced analytics, automation, and IoT devices within warehouses further amplifies the volume and complexity of data, necessitating robust governance frameworks to maintain data integrity and operational efficiency.

Another significant driver is the tightening regulatory landscape around data management and product labeling. Governments and industry bodies worldwide are imposing stricter standards for labeling accuracy, traceability, and data privacy, particularly in highly regulated industries. For example, the healthcare and food & beverage sectors must comply with regulations such as the FDA’s Unique Device Identification (UDI) and the EU’s Food Information to Consumers (FIC) Regulation. These mandates require warehouses to implement comprehensive data governance solutions capable of supporting end-to-end label management, audit trails, and real-time compliance reporting. As a result, organizations are increasingly investing in sophisticated software and services that can automate compliance tasks, reduce human error, and provide actionable insights into labeling processes. This regulatory pressure is expected to sustain high demand for data governance solutions in the warehouse sector throughout the forecast period.

The surge in digital transformation initiatives across industries is also playing a pivotal role in shaping the labeling data governance for warehouses market. Enterprises are leveraging cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to optimize warehouse operations and drive business agility. These technologies enable real-time data capture, analysis, and decision-making, which are essential for effective data governance. Cloud-based solutions, in particular, offer scalability, flexibility, and ease of integration with existing warehouse management systems, making them attractive to organizations of all sizes. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on sustainability and supply chain transparency is prompting companies to adopt data governance practices that enhance visibility, accountability, and reporting capabilities. As digital transformation continues to gain momentum, the demand for integrated, intelligent, and automated data governance solutions in warehouses is expected to rise exponentially.

Regionally, North America remains the dominant market for labeling data governance in warehouses, accounting for more than 35% of the global market share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region’s advanced logistics infrastructure, high adoption rate of digital technologies, and stringent regulatory environment. Europe follows closely, driven by strong compliance requirements and a mature manufacturing sector. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as the fastest-growing market, supported by rapid industrialization, expanding e-commerce, and increasing investment

Snapshot img

US Deep Learning Market Size 2025-2029

The deep learning market size in US is forecast to increase by USD 5.02 billion at a CAGR of 30.1% between 2024 and 2029.

The deep learning market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in various industries for advanced solutioning. This trend is fueled by the availability of vast amounts of data, which is a key requirement for deep learning algorithms to function effectively. Industry-specific solutions are gaining traction, as businesses seek to leverage deep learning for specific use cases such as image and speech recognition, fraud detection, and predictive maintenance. Alongside, intuitive data visualization tools are simplifying complex neural network outputs, helping stakeholders understand and validate insights. 


However, challenges remain, including the need for powerful computing resources, data privacy concerns, and the high cost of implementing and maintaining deep learning systems. Despite these hurdles, the market's potential for innovation and disruption is immense, making it an exciting space for businesses to explore further. Semi-supervised learning, data labeling, and data cleaning facilitate efficient training of deep learning models. Cloud analytics is another significant trend, as companies seek to leverage cloud computing for cost savings and scalability. 

What will be the Size of the market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

Deep learning, a subset of machine learning, continues to shape industries by enabling advanced applications such as image and speech recognition, text generation, and pattern recognition. Reinforcement learning, a type of deep learning, gains traction, with deep reinforcement learning leading the charge. Anomaly detection, a crucial application of unsupervised learning, safeguards systems against security vulnerabilities. Ethical implications and fairness considerations are increasingly important in deep learning, with emphasis on explainable AI and model interpretability. Graph neural networks and attention mechanisms enhance data preprocessing for sequential data modeling and object detection. Time series forecasting and dataset creation further expand deep learning's reach, while privacy preservation and bias mitigation ensure responsible use.

In summary, deep learning's market dynamics reflect a constant pursuit of innovation, efficiency, and ethical considerations. The Deep Learning Market in the US is flourishing as organizations embrace intelligent systems powered by supervised learning and emerging self-supervised learning techniques. These methods refine predictive capabilities and reduce reliance on labeled data, boosting scalability. BFSI firms utilize AI image recognition for various applications, including personalizing customer communication, maintaining a competitive edge, and automating repetitive tasks to boost productivity. Sophisticated feature extraction algorithms now enable models to isolate patterns with high precision, particularly in applications such as image classification for healthcare, security, and retail.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Application

  Image recognition
  Voice recognition
  Video surveillance and diagnostics
  Data mining


Type

  Software
  Services
  Hardware


End-user

  Security
  Automotive
  Healthcare
  Retail and commerce
  Others


Geography

  North America

    US

By Application Insights

The Image recognition segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, image recognition, a subset of computer vision, is gaining significant traction. This technology utilizes neural networks, deep learning models, and various machine learning algorithms to decipher visual data from images and videos. Image recognition is instrumental in numerous applications, including visual search, product recommendations, and inventory management. Consumers can take photographs of products to discover similar items, enhancing the online shopping experience. In the automotive sector, image recognition is indispensable for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles, enabling the identification of pedestrians, other vehicles, road signs, and lane markings.

Furthermore, image recognition plays a pivotal role in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applications, where it tracks physical objects and overlays digital content onto real-world scenarios. The model training process involves the backpropagation algorithm, which calculates the loss fu

This dataset contains metadata (title, abstract, date of publication, field, etc) for around 1 million academic articles. Each record contains additional information on the country of study and whether the article makes use of data. Machine learning tools were used to classify the country of study and data use.

Our data source of academic articles is the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC) (Lo et al. 2020). The corpus contains more than 130 million English language academic papers across multiple disciplines. The papers included in the Semantic Scholar corpus are gathered directly from publishers, from open archives such as arXiv or PubMed, and crawled from the internet.

We placed some restrictions on the articles to make them usable and relevant for our purposes. First, only articles with an abstract and parsed PDF or latex file are included in the analysis. The full text of the abstract is necessary to classify the country of study and whether the article uses data. The parsed PDF and latex file are important for extracting important information like the date of publication and field of study. This restriction eliminated a large number of articles in the original corpus. Around 30 million articles remain after keeping only articles with a parsable (i.e., suitable for digital processing) PDF, and around 26% of those 30 million are eliminated when removing articles without an abstract. Second, only articles from the year 2000 to 2020 were considered. This restriction eliminated an additional 9% of the remaining articles. Finally, articles from the following fields of study were excluded, as we aim to focus on fields that are likely to use data produced by countries’ national statistical system: Biology, Chemistry, Engineering, Physics, Materials Science, Environmental Science, Geology, History, Philosophy, Math, Computer Science, and Art. Fields that are included are: Economics, Political Science, Business, Sociology, Medicine, and Psychology. This third restriction eliminated around 34% of the remaining articles. From an initial corpus of 136 million articles, this resulted in a final corpus of around 10 million articles.

Due to the intensive computer resources required, a set of 1,037,748 articles were randomly selected from the 10 million articles in our restricted corpus as a convenience sample.

The empirical approach employed in this project utilizes text mining with Natural Language Processing (NLP). The goal of NLP is to extract structured information from raw, unstructured text. In this project, NLP is used to extract the country of study and whether the paper makes use of data. We will discuss each of these in turn.

To determine the country or countries of study in each academic article, two approaches are employed based on information found in the title, abstract, or topic fields. The first approach uses regular expression searches based on the presence of ISO3166 country names. A defined set of country names is compiled, and the presence of these names is checked in the relevant fields. This approach is transparent, widely used in social science research, and easily extended to other languages. However, there is a potential for exclusion errors if a country’s name is spelled non-standardly.

The second approach is based on Named Entity Recognition (NER), which uses machine learning to identify objects from text, utilizing the spaCy Python library. The Named Entity Recognition algorithm splits text into named entities, and NER is used in this project to identify countries of study in the academic articles. SpaCy supports multiple languages and has been trained on multiple spellings of countries, overcoming some of the limitations of the regular expression approach. If a country is identified by either the regular expression search or NER, it is linked to the article. Note that one article can be linked to more than one country.

The second task is to classify whether the paper uses data. A supervised machine learning approach is employed, where 3500 publications were first randomly selected and manually labeled by human raters using the Mechanical Turk service (Paszke et al. 2019).[1] To make sure the human raters had a similar and appropriate definition of data in mind, they were given the following instructions before seeing their first paper:

Each of these documents is an academic article. The goal of this study is to measure whether a specific academic article is using data and from which country the data came.

There are two classification tasks in this exercise:

1. identifying whether an academic article is using data from any country

2. Identifying from which country that data came.

For task 1, we are looking specifically at the use of data. Data is any information that has been collected, observed, generated or created to produce research findings. As an example, a study that reports findings or analysis using a survey data, uses data. Some clues to indicate that a study does use data includes whether a survey or census is described, a statistical model estimated, or a table or means or summary statistics is reported.

After an article is classified as using data, please note the type of data used. The options are population or business census, survey data, administrative data, geospatial data, private sector data, and other data. If no data is used, then mark "Not applicable". In cases where multiple data types are used, please click multiple options.[2]

For task 2, we are looking at the country or countries that are studied in the article. In some cases, no country may be applicable. For instance, if the research is theoretical and has no specific country application. In some cases, the research article may involve multiple countries. In these cases, select all countries that are discussed in the paper.

We expect between 10 and 35 percent of all articles to use data.

The median amount of time that a worker spent on an article, measured as the time between when the article was accepted to be classified by the worker and when the classification was submitted was 25.4 minutes. If human raters were exclusively used rather than machine learning tools, then the corpus of 1,037,748 articles examined in this study would take around 50 years of human work time to review at a cost of $3,113,244, which assumes a cost of $3 per article as was paid to MTurk workers.

A model is next trained on the 3,500 labelled articles. We use a distilled version of the BERT (bidirectional Encoder Representations for transformers) model to encode raw text into a numeric format suitable for predictions (Devlin et al. (2018)). BERT is pre-trained on a large corpus comprising the Toronto Book Corpus and Wikipedia. The distilled version (DistilBERT) is a compressed model that is 60% the size of BERT and retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities and is 60% faster (Sanh, Debut, Chaumond, Wolf 2019). We use PyTorch to produce a model to classify articles based on the labeled data. Of the 3,500 articles that were hand coded by the MTurk workers, 900 are fed to the machine learning model. 900 articles were selected because of computational limitations in training the NLP model. A classification of “uses data” was assigned if the model predicted an article used data with at least 90% confidence.

The performance of the models classifying articles to countries and as using data or not can be compared to the classification by the human raters. We consider the human raters as giving us the ground truth. This may underestimate the model performance if the workers at times got the allocation wrong in a way that would not apply to the model. For instance, a human rater could mistake the Republic of Korea for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. If both humans and the model perform the same kind of errors, then the performance reported here will be overestimated.

The model was able to predict whether an article made use of data with 87% accuracy evaluated on the set of articles held out of the model training. The correlation between the number of articles written about each country using data estimated under the two approaches is given in the figure below. The number of articles represents an aggregate total of

Automotive Data Labeling Services Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global automotive data labeling services market size reached USD 1.49 billion in 2024. The market is demonstrating robust growth, propelled by the escalating integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the automotive sector. The market is projected to witness a CAGR of 21.3% from 2025 to 2033, with the total market value forecasted to reach USD 9.85 billion by 2033. The primary growth factor is the surging demand for high-quality labeled data to train advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving algorithms, reflecting a transformative shift in the automotive industry.

The burgeoning adoption of autonomous vehicles and intelligent transportation systems is a significant driver fueling the growth of the automotive data labeling services market. As automotive manufacturers and technology providers race to develop reliable self-driving solutions, the requirement for accurately annotated data has become paramount. Labeled data serves as the backbone for training machine learning models, enabling vehicles to recognize objects, interpret traffic signals, and make real-time decisions. The increasing complexity of automotive systems, including multi-sensor fusion and advanced perception modules, necessitates high volumes of meticulously labeled data across image, video, and sensor modalities. This trend is compelling automotive stakeholders to invest heavily in data labeling services, thereby accelerating market expansion.

Another critical growth factor is the rapid evolution of connected vehicles and the proliferation of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). With the automotive industry embracing connectivity, vehicles are generating unprecedented amounts of data from cameras, LiDAR, radar, and other sensors. The need to annotate this data for applications such as lane departure warning, collision avoidance, and adaptive cruise control is intensifying. Moreover, regulatory mandates for safety and the push towards zero-accident mobility are driving OEMs and suppliers to enhance the accuracy and robustness of their perception systems. This, in turn, is boosting the demand for comprehensive data labeling solutions tailored to automotive requirements, further propelling market growth.

The increasing collaboration between automotive OEMs, technology companies, and specialized data labeling service providers is also shaping the market landscape. Partnerships are being formed to leverage domain expertise, ensure data security, and achieve scalability in annotation projects. The emergence of new labeling techniques, such as 3D point cloud annotation and semantic segmentation, is enhancing the quality of training datasets, thereby improving the performance of AI-driven automotive applications. Additionally, the integration of automated and semi-automated labeling tools is reducing annotation time and costs, making data labeling more accessible to a broader range of industry participants. These collaborative efforts and technological advancements are fostering innovation and driving sustained growth in the automotive data labeling services market.

From a regional perspective, North America and Asia Pacific are emerging as the dominant markets for automotive data labeling services. North America, led by the United States, is witnessing significant investments in autonomous driving research and development, while Asia Pacific is experiencing rapid growth due to the expansion of automotive manufacturing hubs and the increasing adoption of smart mobility solutions. Europe, with its strong automotive heritage and regulatory focus on vehicle safety, is also contributing substantially to market growth. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America, though smaller in market share, are gradually recognizing the potential of data-driven automotive technologies, setting the stage for future expansion in these regions.

Service Type Analysis

The service type se

TimeSen2Crop is a pixel based dataset made up of more than 1 million samples of Sentinel 2 Time Series associated to 16 crop types, during an agronomic year ranging from September 2017 to August 2018. The dataset contains atmospherically corrected samples, as well as information related to snow, clouds and shadows. This benchmark dataset has been developed in the framework of the ExtremeEarth project, which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 825258.