The open-source data labeling tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality training data in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The market's expansion is fueled by several factors: the rising adoption of AI across various sectors (including IT, automotive, healthcare, and finance), the need for cost-effective data annotation solutions, and the inherent flexibility and customization offered by open-source tools. While cloud-based solutions currently dominate the market due to scalability and accessibility, on-premise deployments remain significant, particularly for organizations with stringent data security requirements. The market's growth is further propelled by advancements in automation and semi-supervised learning techniques within data labeling, leading to increased efficiency and reduced annotation costs. Geographic distribution shows a strong concentration in North America and Europe, reflecting the higher adoption of AI technologies in these regions; however, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a rapidly growing market due to increasing investment in AI and the availability of a large workforce for data annotation. Despite the promising outlook, certain challenges restrain market growth. The complexity of implementing and maintaining open-source tools, along with the need for specialized technical expertise, can pose barriers to entry for smaller organizations. Furthermore, the quality control and data governance aspects of open-source annotation require careful consideration. The potential for data bias and the need for robust validation processes necessitate a strategic approach to ensure data accuracy and reliability. Competition is intensifying with both established and emerging players vying for market share, forcing companies to focus on differentiation through innovation and specialized functionalities within their tools. The market is anticipated to maintain a healthy growth trajectory in the coming years, with increasing adoption across diverse sectors and geographical regions. The continued advancements in automation and the growing emphasis on data quality will be key drivers of future market expansion.

TagX data annotation services are a set of tools and processes used to accurately label and classify large amounts of data for use in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The services are designed to be highly accurate, efficient, and customizable, allowing for a wide range of data types and use cases.

The process typically begins with a team of trained annotators reviewing and categorizing the data, using a variety of annotation tools and techniques, such as text classification, image annotation, and video annotation. The annotators may also use natural language processing and other advanced techniques to extract relevant information and context from the data.

Once the data has been annotated, it is then validated and checked for accuracy by a team of quality assurance specialists. Any errors or inconsistencies are corrected, and the data is then prepared for use in machine learning and AI models.

TagX annotation services can be applied to a wide range of data types, including text, images, videos, and audio. The services can be customized to meet the specific needs of each client, including the type of data, the level of annotation required, and the desired level of accuracy.

TagX data annotation services provide a powerful and efficient way to prepare large amounts of data for use in machine learning and AI applications, allowing organizations to extract valuable insights and improve their decision-making processes.

The global Data Labeling Solution and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $70 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by the burgeoning need for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI models. Key growth drivers include the expanding application of AI in various industries like automotive (autonomous vehicles), healthcare (medical image analysis), and financial services (fraud detection). The increasing availability of diverse data types (text, image/video, audio) further contributes to market growth. However, challenges such as the high cost of data labeling, data privacy concerns, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and execute labeling projects pose certain restraints on market expansion. Segmentation by application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, others) and data type (text, image/video, audio) reveals distinct growth trajectories within the market. The automotive and healthcare sectors currently dominate, but the government and financial services segments are showing promising growth potential. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk, Appen, and Labelbox are leading the market, leveraging their expertise in crowdsourcing, automation, and specialized data labeling solutions. However, the market shows strong potential for innovation, particularly in the development of automated data labeling tools and the expansion of services into niche areas. Regional analysis indicates strong market penetration in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and robust research and development efforts. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years fueled by rapid technological advancements and a rising demand for AI solutions. Further investment in R&D focused on automation, improved data security, and the development of more effective data labeling methodologies will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of this rapidly expanding market.

The global data labeling tools market is projected to reach a value of USD 12.19 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 31.9% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. The growing volume of unstructured data, the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies, and the need for high-quality labeled data for training machine learning models are the key factors driving market growth. The market is segmented by type into cloud-based and on-premises solutions, with the cloud-based segment holding a dominant share due to its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility. By application, the market is divided into IT, automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, retail, and others. The IT segment is expected to account for the largest share during the forecast period as businesses increasingly adopt AI and ML technologies to automate their processes and gain insights from data.

The Data Labeling Solutions and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in the artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $75 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing adoption of AI across diverse industries, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, necessitates vast amounts of accurately labeled data for model training and improvement. Secondly, advancements in deep learning algorithms and the emergence of sophisticated data annotation tools are streamlining the labeling process, boosting efficiency and reducing costs. Finally, the growing availability of diverse data sources, coupled with the rise of specialized data labeling companies, is further contributing to market growth. Despite these positive trends, the market faces some challenges. The high cost associated with data annotation, particularly for complex datasets requiring specialized expertise, can be a barrier for smaller businesses. Ensuring data quality and consistency across large-scale projects remains a critical concern, necessitating robust quality control measures. Furthermore, addressing data privacy and security issues is essential to maintain ethical standards and build trust within the market. The market segmentation by type (text, image/video, audio) and application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, etc.) presents significant opportunities for specialized service providers catering to niche needs. Competition is expected to intensify as new players enter the market, focusing on innovative solutions and specialized services.

Market Analysis: The AI Data Labeling Solution market is anticipated to grow at a substantial CAGR of XX% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. This growth is driven by the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies, along with the demand for high-quality annotated data for model training. The market is segmented by application (IT, automotive, healthcare, financial, etc.), type (cloud-based, on-premise), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, etc.). The cloud-based segment is expected to hold a dominant share due to its flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. North America is expected to lead the market due to the early adoption of AI technologies. Key Trends and Challenges: One of the key trends in the AI Data Labeling Solution market is the rise of automated and semi-automated data labeling tools. These tools utilize AI algorithms to streamline the process, reducing the cost and time required to label large datasets. Another notable trend is the increasing demand for AI-labeled data in sectors such as autonomous driving, healthcare, and finance. However, the market also faces challenges, including the lack of standardized data labeling practices and regulations, as well as concerns over data privacy and security.

This is the digital appendix to the dissertation with the title "Glyco-STORM: lectins as a new labeling tool to decipher the nanoarchitecture of cells" by Helene Schröter. In this study, previous obstacles in studying the glycome were overcome by combining fluorophore-conjugated lectins – carbohydrate-binding proteins – with super-resolution microscopy. This approach was termed Glyco-STORM and led to the establishment of new anatomical markers to analyse the architecture of cell organelles and synaptic specializations on the nanoscale. Since lectins reflect the carbohydrate-specific morphology of the underlying structures, the results enable a new – ‘glyco-centric’ – picture of cell machineries, achieving a new level in understanding the function of biological systems. Cracking the ‘sugar code’ by using lectins as labels in a biological context could bring a breakthrough in understanding health and disease of organisms.

Enterprise Labeling Software Market size was valued at USD 348.8 Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 595.9 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.6% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

Global Enterprise Labeling Software Market Drivers

The market drivers for the Enterprise Labeling Software Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include:

Globalization and the Complexity of Supply Chains: Supply chains are becoming more complex as a result of companies growing internationally. Businesses can handle the different labeling needs across different locations and adhere to local standards with the aid of enterprise labeling software.
Adherence to Regulations: Accurate and compliant labeling is required by strict regulatory standards in businesses including medicines, food and beverage, and healthcare. Enterprise labeling software helps businesses make sure their labels adhere to local and industry requirements.
A greater Emphasis on Visibility and Traceability: The importance of visibility and traceability in supply chains has increased. Better product tracking throughout the supply chain is made possible by the tools that enterprise labeling software offers for producing labels.
Including Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Integration: Processes for creating and printing labels can be made more streamlined and effective by integrating labeling software with ERP systems. Retaining consistency and minimizing labeling errors require this integration.
Need for Automated Labelling: Businesses are calling for more automation in their labeling operations as they look to increase productivity and decrease human error. Label creation, printing, and management can be automated with the use of enterprise labeling software.
Pay attention to Product Identification and Branding: Labels are essential for identifying products and helping consumers recognize brands. Businesses are spending money on enterprise labeling software to produce uniform, aesthetically pleasing labels that build consumer trust and improve brand perception.
Cloud-Based Solutions’ Emergence: The adoption of cloud-based labeling solutions opens up new possibilities in terms of accessibility, scalability, and customization. Companies may manage labels centrally and access them from several places with cloud-based enterprise labelling software.
Technological Progress: The need for complex enterprise labeling software that can handle emerging labeling technologies, such as RFID and smart labels, is driven by the need for better tracking and information retrieval.

This data record contains 5 zip files all used to build and use a semantic segmentation model to operate on beach imagery taken at the Field Research Facility (FRF) in Duck, North Carolina, USA. All data is from 2015-2021

The `training_data.zip` contains all data used to train the ML model. All images come from the north facing (c1) camera. This zip file includes: a list of classes used to label the imagery, and folders of 107 images, 107 sparse annotations (doodles), 107 labels, and 107 overlays. All labeling was done with the open-source labeling tool ‘Doodler (Buscombe et al., 2021).

The `model.zip` file contains the ML model, and associated metadata. This includes: a JSON model configuration file, a figure showing model training statistics, an `.npz` file of model training output, a list of training and validation files, the model as an h5 file and in the Tensorflow ‘saved model’ format. All modeling was done with Segmentation Gym (Buscombe & Goldstein 2022).

The `test_data_c6.zip` file contains all data from the south facing (c6) camera to test the ML model. This includes: a list of classes used to label the imagery, and folders of 10 images, 10 sparse annotations (doodles), 10 labels, and 10 overlays. All labeling was done with the open-source labeling tool ‘Doodler (Buscombe et al., 2021). Testing the model with this data was done with codes in: https://github.com/ebgoldstein/FRF_GrainSize

The `test_data_c1.zip` file contains all data from the north facing (c1) camera to test the ML model. This includes: a list of classes used to label the imagery, and folders of 10 images, 10 sparse annotations (doodles), 10 labels, and 10 overlays. All labeling was done with an open-source labeling tool ‘Doodler (Buscombe et al., 2021). Testing the model with this data was done with codes in: https://github.com/ebgoldstein/FRF_GrainSize

The `predictions.zip` file contains 4418 images from the north facing (c1) camera that were run through the trained segmentation model as well as the resulting output (presented as side-by-side image and overlays). These images were created using codes in Segmentation Gym (Buscombe & Goldstein 2022).

Image Labeling

## Overview

Image Labeling is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Tool Parts annotations for 613 images.

## Getting Started

You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.

  ## License

  This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).

The zip file here contains 1,179 pairs of human-generated segmentation labels and images from Emergency Response Imagery collected by US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) after Hurricane Barry, Delta, Dorian, Florence, Ida, Laura, Michael, Sally, Zeta, and Tropical Storm Gordon. A total of 1,054 unique images were labeled. 946 images were annotated by a single labeler. 95 images were annotated by two labelers. 11 images were annotated by three labelers. 2 images were annotated by five labelers. All authors contributed to labeling, and all labeling was done with an open-source labeling tool (Buscombe et al., 2022).

All pixels in each image are labeled with one of four classes: 0 (water), 1 (bare sand), 2 (vegetation - both sparse and dense), 4 (the built environment - buildings, roads, parking lots, boats, etc.)

The csv file provided here is a list of each image file name (which includes the anonymized labeler ID), the name of the image without the labeler ID, the name of the corresponding NOAA jpg, the NOAA flight name, the storm name, the latitude and longitude of the image, and a column stating if the image has been labeled multiple times.

Images labeled here correspond to multiple NOAA flights — all listed in the csv file for each jpeg image. These jpeg images can be downloaded directly from NOAA (https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/) or using Moretz et al. (2020a, 2020b). The images included in this data release correspond to original NOAA images that have been resized and then split into quadrants (using ImageMagick). The naming convention corresponds to the image quarter — the *-0.jpg is upper left, *-1.jpg is upper right, *-2.jpg is lower left, and *-3.jpg is the lower right.

The resize command used was:

to resize and then quarter

Dir structure is:

--Desktop

|- originals

|- resized

|- quarters

cd originals mogrify -resize 2000x2000 -path ../resized *.jpg

then quarter them

cd .. cd resized

mogrify -crop 2x2@ +repage -path ../quarters *.jpg

For full size images, please download the jpegs directly from NOAA.

The Image Data Labeling Service market is expected to experience significant growth over the next decade, driven by the increasing demand for annotated data for artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The market is expected to grow from USD XXX million in 2025 to USD XXX million by 2033, at a CAGR of XX%. The growth of the market is attributed to the growing adoption of AI in various industries, including IT, automotive, healthcare, and financial services. The growing use of computer vision and machine learning algorithms for tasks such as object detection, image classification, and facial recognition has led to a surge in demand for annotated data. Image data labeling services provide the labeled data that is essential for training these algorithms. The market is expected to be further driven by the increasing availability of cloud-based services and the adoption of automation tools for image data labeling. Additionally, the growing awareness of the importance of data quality for AI applications is expected to drive the adoption of image data labeling services.

Additional file 1: Table S1. Reported risk of bias (ROB) across selected studies.

Market Analysis for Text Annotation Tool The global market for text annotation tools is projected to grow significantly, reaching XXX million USD by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2033. Key drivers behind this growth include the increasing demand for accurate data labeling for machine learning and natural language processing applications, the rise of cloud computing and AI-driven automation, and the expanding need for data annotation in various sectors such as healthcare, finance, and research. The market is segmented by application (commercial use, personal use), type (text annotation tool, image annotation tool, others), company (CloudApp, iMerit, Playment, Trilldata Technologies, Amazon Web Services, and others), and region (North America, South America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific). North America currently holds the largest market share, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The increasing adoption of text annotation tools by enterprises and government agencies is expected to drive growth in the commercial use segment, while the demand for personal annotation tools for research and academic purposes is expected to fuel growth in the personal use segment.

The market size of the Enterprise Labeling Software Market is categorized based on Type (Label Design Software, Barcode Labeling Software, RFID Labeling Solutions, Label Printing Software, Compliance Labeling Tools) and Application (Product Labeling, Asset Tracking, Regulatory Compliance, Inventory Management) and geographical regions (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle-East and Africa).

This report provides insights into the market size and forecasts the value of the market, expressed in USD million, across these defined segments.

Here are a few use cases for this project:

1. Agriculture Disease Prediction: This computer vision model could be used for predicting and classifying plant diseases. The model can help agronomists and farmers diagnose diseases like Konjac Mosaic, Leaf Blight, and Brown Leaf Spot, pan their treatment strategies and potentially prevent large scale crop damage.

2. Pest Control: The model would be beneficial in identifying pest attacks on plants, specifically from insects like Locust or Grossper, which would aid in early pest detection, enabling timely extermination measures, reducing potential damage to crops.

3. Educational Tool: The model can be used in botany and agriculture-based education platforms as an interactive teaching tool to help students and researchers learn about plant diseases and pests, recognize their symptoms visually, and study their impacts.

4. Environment Monitoring: Conservation organizations could use this computer vision model to monitor the health of vegetation in parks, forests, reserves, and other natural areas.

5. Smart Greenhouses: This model could be integrated into the systems of tech-enabled greenhouses, helping to maintain the health of the plants by identifying diseases and pests early, and suggesting appropriate treatment. Also could be used for the inspection of the health status of each plant automatically, without the need for human intervention.

Leaves from genetically unique Juglans regia plants were scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA). Soil samples were collected in Fall of 2017 from the riparian oak forest located at the Russell Ranch Sustainable Agricultural Institute at the University of California Davis. The soil was sieved through a 2 mm mesh and was air dried before imaging. A single soil aggregate was scanned at 23 keV using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers on beamline 8.3.2 at the ALS. Additionally, a drought stressed almond flower bud (Prunus dulcis) from a plant housed at the University of California, Davis, was scanned using a 4x lens with a pixel resolution of 1.72 µm on beamline 8.3.2 at the ALS Raw tomographic image data was reconstructed using TomoPy. Reconstructions were converted to 8-bit tif or png format using ImageJ or the PIL package in Python before further processing. Images were annotated using Intel’s Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) and ImageJ. Both CVAT and ImageJ are free to use and open source. Leaf images were annotated in following Théroux-Rancourt et al. (2020). Specifically, Hand labeling was done directly in ImageJ by drawing around each tissue; with 5 images annotated per leaf. Care was taken to cover a range of anatomical variation to help improve the generalizability of the models to other leaves. All slices were labeled by Dr. Mina Momayyezi and Fiona Duong.To annotate the flower bud and soil aggregate, images were imported into CVAT. The exterior border of the bud (i.e. bud scales) and flower were annotated in CVAT and exported as masks. Similarly, the exterior of the soil aggregate and particulate organic matter identified by eye were annotated in CVAT and exported as masks. To annotate air spaces in both the bud and soil aggregate, images were imported into ImageJ. A gaussian blur was applied to the image to decrease noise and then the air space was segmented using thresholding. After applying the threshold, the selected air space region was converted to a binary image with white representing the air space and black representing everything else. This binary image was overlaid upon the original image and the air space within the flower bud and aggregate was selected using the “free hand” tool. Air space outside of the region of interest for both image sets was eliminated. The quality of the air space annotation was then visually inspected for accuracy against the underlying original image; incomplete annotations were corrected using the brush or pencil tool to paint missing air space white and incorrectly identified air space black. Once the annotation was satisfactorily corrected, the binary image of the air space was saved. Finally, the annotations of the bud and flower or aggregate and organic matter were opened in ImageJ and the associated air space mask was overlaid on top of them forming a three-layer mask suitable for training the fully convolutional network. All labeling of the soil aggregate and soil aggregate images was done by Dr. Devin Rippner. These images and annotations are for training deep learning models to identify different constituents in leaves, almond buds, and soil aggregates Limitations: For the walnut leaves, some tissues (stomata, etc.) are not labeled and only represent a small portion of a full leaf. Similarly, both the almond bud and the aggregate represent just one single sample of each. The bud tissues are only divided up into buds scales, flower, and air space. Many other tissues remain unlabeled. For the soil aggregate annotated labels are done by eye with no actual chemical information. Therefore particulate organic matter identification may be incorrect. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of a Forest Soil Aggregate. File Name: forest_soil_images_masks_for_testing_training.zipResource Description: This aggregate was collected from the riparian oak forest at the Russell Ranch Sustainable Agricultural Facility. The aggreagate was scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers. For masks, the background has a value of 0,0,0; pores spaces have a value of 250,250, 250; mineral solids have a value= 128,0,0; and particulate organic matter has a value of = 000,128,000. These files were used for training a model to segment the forest soil aggregate and for testing the accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score of the model.Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of an Almond bud (P. Dulcis). File Name: Almond_bud_tube_D_P6_training_testing_images_and_masks.zipResource Description: Drought stressed almond flower bud (Prunis dulcis) from a plant housed at the University of California, Davis, was scanned by X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 4x lens with a pixel resolution of 1.72 µm using. For masks, the background has a value of 0,0,0; air spaces have a value of 255,255, 255; bud scales have a value= 128,0,0; and flower tissues have a value of = 000,128,000. These files were used for training a model to segment the almond bud and for testing the accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score of the model.Resource Software Recommended: Fiji (ImageJ),url: https://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloads Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of Walnut leaves (J. Regia) . File Name: 6_leaf_training_testing_images_and_masks_for_paper.zipResource Description: Stems were collected from genetically unique J. regia accessions at the 117 USDA-ARS-NCGR in Wolfskill Experimental Orchard, Winters, California USA to use as scion, and were grafted by Sierra Gold Nursery onto a commonly used commercial rootstock, RX1 (J. microcarpa × J. regia). We used a common rootstock to eliminate any own-root effects and to simulate conditions for a commercial walnut orchard setting, where rootstocks are commonly used. The grafted saplings were repotted and transferred to the Armstrong lathe house facility at the University of California, Davis in June 2019, and kept under natural light and temperature. Leaves from each accession and treatment were scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers. For masks, the background has a value of 170,170,170; Epidermis value= 85,85,85; Mesophyll value= 0,0,0; Bundle Sheath Extension value= 152,152,152; Vein value= 220,220,220; Air value = 255,255,255.Resource Software Recommended: Fiji (ImageJ),url: https://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloads

The csv files contain human-generated labels for Emergency Response Imagery collected by US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) after Hurricane Barry, Delta, Dorian, Florence, Ida, Isaias, Laura, Michael, Sally, Zeta, and Tropical Storm Gordon. All authors contributed to labeling the imagery. All labeling was done with an open-source labeling tool (Rafique et al., 2020).

All csv files provide the userID (the ID of the anonymous labeler), the NOAA flight, the NOAA image, and 6 labels — allWater (if the image was all water), devType (if the image had buildings/development), washoverType (if the image had washover deposits), dmgType (if the image showed damage to built environment), impactType (if the labeler could identify the coastal impact, using the Storm Impact Scale from Sallenger, 2000), and terrainType (the type of physical environment).

Images labeled here correspond to multiple NOAA flights — all listed in the csv file for each jpeg image. These jpeg images can be downloaded directly from NOAA (https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/) or using Moretz et al. (2020a, 2020b).

There are three csv files:

ReleaseData_10172022.csv has 10,237 labels for 4250 images. These labels were generated by coastal scientists. The csv also contains the Latitude and Longitude of the image center (from NOAA).

ReleaseDataQuads.csv has 400 labels for 100 images. These labels were generated by coastal scientists. The images labeled in this set correspond to original NOAA images that have been split into quadrants. Splitting images was done with ImageMagick. The command used to split the images was:

magick mogrify -crop 2x2@ +repage -path ../quadrants *.jpg

The naming convention corresponds to the image quarter — the *-0.jpg is upper left, *-1.jpg is upper right, *-2.jpg is lower left, and *-3.jpg is the lower right.

ReleaseDataNCE.csv has 400 labels for 100 images. These images were labeled by non-coastal scientists. Note that the 100 images were also labeled by coastal scientists — those labels can be found in ReleaseData_v3.csv.

There is another companion dataset to this, with slightly different labels (Goldstein et al., 2020).

A zip file of images is also provided for demonstration purposes (images.zip). These are resized copies made with imagemagick, with the longest dimension set at 2000 pixels ( mogrify -resize 2000x2000). For full size images, please download the jpegs directly from NOAA.

The AI data labeling solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train and improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of AI applications across diverse sectors, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, necessitates vast amounts of labeled data. Cloud-based solutions are gaining prominence due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation techniques and the emergence of specialized AI data labeling platforms are contributing to market expansion. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns, the need for highly skilled professionals, and the complexities of handling diverse data formats continue to restrain market growth to some extent. The market segmentation reveals that the cloud-based solutions segment is expected to dominate due to its inherent advantages over on-premise solutions. In terms of application, the automotive sector is projected to exhibit the fastest growth, driven by the increasing adoption of autonomous driving technology and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). The healthcare industry is also a major contributor, with the rise of AI-powered diagnostic tools and personalized medicine driving demand for accurate medical image and data labeling. Geographically, North America currently holds a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is poised for rapid growth owing to increasing investments in AI and technological advancements. The competitive landscape is marked by a diverse range of established players and emerging startups, fostering innovation and competition within the market. The continued evolution of AI and its integration across various industries ensures the continued expansion of the AI data labeling solution market in the coming years.

This dataset consists of a set of CSV files each representing a "dump" of point labels from a set of buildings. Most of the files only contain a single column (point labels); several of them also contain other dimensions such as engineering units, Haystack tags and other BACnet object properties.