100+ datasets found
  1. Dataset: An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.nist.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 29, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Standards and Technology (2022). Dataset: An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/dataset-an-open-combinatorial-diffraction-dataset-including-consensus-human-and-machine-le-0de06
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 29, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Standards and Technologyhttp://www.nist.gov/
    Description

    The open dataset, software, and other files accompanying the manuscript "An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models," submitted for publication to Integrated Materials and Manufacturing Innovations.Machine learning and autonomy are increasingly prevalent in materials science, but existing models are often trained or tuned using idealized data as absolute ground truths. In actual materials science, "ground truth" is often a matter of interpretation and is more readily determined by consensus. Here we present the data, software, and other files for a study using as-obtained diffraction data as a test case for evaluating the performance of machine learning models in the presence of differing expert opinions. We demonstrate that experts with similar backgrounds can disagree greatly even for something as intuitive as using diffraction to identify the start and end of a phase transformation. We then use a logarithmic likelihood method to evaluate the performance of machine learning models in relation to the consensus expert labels and their variance. We further illustrate this method's efficacy in ranking a number of state-of-the-art phase mapping algorithms. We propose a materials data challenge centered around the problem of evaluating models based on consensus with uncertainty. The data, labels, and code used in this study are all available online at data.gov, and the interested reader is encouraged to replicate and improve the existing models or to propose alternative methods for evaluating algorithmic performance.

  2. Image Data Labeling Service Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Image Data Labeling Service Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/image-data-labeling-service-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Image Data Labeling Service Market Outlook



    The global image data labeling service market size was valued at approximately USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 6.1 billion by 2032, exhibiting a robust CAGR of 17.1% during the forecast period. The exponential growth of this market is driven by the increasing demand for high-quality labeled data for machine learning and artificial intelligence applications across various industries.



    One of the primary growth factors of the image data labeling service market is the surge in the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies across multiple sectors. Organizations are increasingly relying on AI and ML to enhance operational efficiency, improve customer experience, and gain competitive advantages. As a result, there is a rising need for accurately labeled data to train these AI and ML models, driving the demand for image data labeling services. Furthermore, advancements in computer vision technology have expanded the scope of image data labeling, making it essential for applications such as autonomous vehicles, facial recognition, and medical imaging.



    Another significant factor contributing to market growth is the proliferation of big data. The massive volume of data generated from various sources, including social media, surveillance cameras, and IoT devices, necessitates the need for effective data labeling solutions. Companies are leveraging image data labeling services to manage and analyze these vast datasets efficiently. Additionally, the growing focus on personalized customer experiences in sectors like retail and e-commerce is fueling the demand for labeled data, which helps in understanding customer preferences and behaviors.



    Investment in research and development (R&D) activities by key players in the market is also a crucial growth driver. Companies are continuously innovating and developing new techniques to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of image data labeling processes. These advancements not only improve the quality of labeled data but also reduce the time and cost associated with manual labeling. The integration of AI and machine learning algorithms in the labeling process is further boosting the market growth by automating repetitive tasks and minimizing human errors.



    From a regional perspective, North America holds the largest market share due to early adoption of advanced technologies and the presence of major AI and ML companies. The region is expected to maintain its dominance during the forecast period, driven by continuous technological advancements and substantial investments in AI research. Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate due to the rising adoption of AI technologies in countries like China, Japan, and India. The increasing focus on digital transformation and government initiatives to promote AI adoption are significant factors contributing to the regional market growth.



    Type Analysis



    The image data labeling service market is segmented into three primary types: manual labeling, semi-automatic labeling, and automatic labeling. Manual labeling, which involves human annotators tagging images, is essential for ensuring high accuracy, especially in complex tasks. Despite being time-consuming and labor-intensive, manual labeling is widely used in applications where nuanced understanding and precision are paramount. This segment continues to hold a significant market share due to the reliability it offers. However, the cost and time constraints associated with manual labeling are driving the growth of more advanced labeling techniques.



    Semi-automatic labeling combines human intervention with automated processes, providing a balance between accuracy and efficiency. In this approach, algorithms perform initial labeling, and human annotators refine and validate the results. This method significantly reduces the time required for data labeling while maintaining high accuracy levels. The semi-automatic labeling segment is gaining traction as it offers a scalable and cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for industries dealing with large volumes of data, such as retail and IT.



    Automatic labeling, driven by AI and machine learning algorithms, represents the most advanced segment of the market. This approach leverages sophisticated models to autonomously label image data with minimal human intervention. The continuous improvement in AI algorithms, along with the availability of large datasets for training, has enhanced the accuracy and reliability of automatic lab

  3. D

    Data Collection and Labelling Report

    • marketresearchforecast.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Research Forecast (2025). Data Collection and Labelling Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/reports/data-collection-and-labelling-33030
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Research Forecast
    License

    https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The data collection and labeling market is experiencing robust growth, fueled by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% over the forecast period (2025-2033), reaching approximately $75 billion by 2033. This expansion is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of AI across diverse sectors, including healthcare (medical image analysis, drug discovery), automotive (autonomous driving systems), finance (fraud detection, risk assessment), and retail (personalized recommendations, inventory management). The rising complexity of AI models and the need for more diverse and nuanced datasets are significant contributing factors to this growth. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation tools and techniques, such as active learning and synthetic data generation, are streamlining the data labeling process and making it more cost-effective. However, challenges remain. Data privacy concerns and regulations like GDPR necessitate robust data security measures, adding to the cost and complexity of data collection and labeling. The shortage of skilled data annotators also hinders market growth, necessitating investments in training and upskilling programs. Despite these restraints, the market’s inherent potential, coupled with ongoing technological advancements and increased industry investments, ensures sustained expansion in the coming years. Geographic distribution shows strong concentration in North America and Europe initially, but Asia-Pacific is poised for rapid growth due to increasing AI adoption and the availability of a large workforce. This makes strategic partnerships and global expansion crucial for market players aiming for long-term success.

  4. D

    Data Labeling Software Report

    • archivemarketresearch.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Feb 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Archive Market Research (2025). Data Labeling Software Report [Dataset]. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/data-labeling-software-31930
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Archive Market Research
    License

    https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    Market Analysis for Data Labeling Software The global data labeling software market is expected to reach a valuation of USD 53 million by 2033, exhibiting a remarkable CAGR of 16.6% over the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is attributed to the surging demand for accurately labeled data for AI model training and the proliferation of machine learning and deep learning applications across various industries. Key Drivers, Trends, and Restraints The major drivers fueling market growth include the increasing adoption of AI and ML in enterprise operations, the growing volume of unstructured data, and the need for high-quality labeled data for model training. Other significant trends include the rise of cloud-based data labeling platforms, the integration of automation technologies, and the emergence of specialized data labeling tools for specific industry verticals. However, the market faces certain restraints, such as data privacy concerns, the cost and complexity of data labeling, and the shortage of skilled data labelers. Data labeling software is essential for training machine learning models. It enables users to annotate data with labels that identify the objects or concepts present, which helps the model learn to recognize and classify them. The market for data labeling software is growing rapidly, driven by the increasing demand for machine learning and AI applications.

  5. Code for Predicting MIEs from Gene Expression and Chemical Target Labels...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 21, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) (2022). Code for Predicting MIEs from Gene Expression and Chemical Target Labels with Machine Learning (MIEML) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/code-for-predicting-mies-from-gene-expression-and-chemical-target-labels-with-machine-lear
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    United States Environmental Protection Agencyhttp://www.epa.gov/
    Description

    Modeling data and analysis scripts generated during the current study are available in the github repository: https://github.com/USEPA/CompTox-MIEML. RefChemDB is available for download as supplemental material from its original publication (PMID: 30570668). LINCS gene expression data are publicly available and accessible through the gene expression omnibus (GSE92742 and GSE70138) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ . This dataset is associated with the following publication: Bundy, J., R. Judson, A. Williams, C. Grulke, I. Shah, and L. Everett. Predicting Molecular Initiating Events Using Chemical Target Annotations and Gene Expression. BioData Mining. BioMed Central Ltd, London, UK, issue}: 7, (2022).

  6. O

    Open Source Data Labeling Tool Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated May 31, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Open Source Data Labeling Tool Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/open-source-data-labeling-tool-1421234
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The open-source data labeling tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality training data in various AI applications. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors: the rising adoption of machine learning and deep learning algorithms across industries, the need for efficient and cost-effective data annotation solutions, and a growing preference for customizable and flexible tools that can adapt to diverse data types and project requirements. While proprietary solutions exist, the open-source ecosystem offers advantages including community support, transparency, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to tailor tools to specific needs, fostering innovation and accessibility. The market is segmented by tool type (image, text, video, audio), deployment model (cloud, on-premise), and industry (automotive, healthcare, finance). We project a market size of approximately $500 million in 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $2.7 billion by 2033. This growth is tempered by challenges such as the complexities associated with data security, the need for skilled personnel to manage and use these tools effectively, and the inherent limitations of certain open-source solutions compared to their commercial counterparts. Despite these restraints, the open-source model's inherent flexibility and cost advantages will continue to attract a significant user base. The market's competitive landscape includes established players like Alecion and Appen, alongside numerous smaller companies and open-source communities actively contributing to the development and improvement of these tools. Geographical expansion is expected across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with the latter projected to witness significant growth due to the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning in developing economies. Future market trends point towards increased integration of automated labeling techniques within open-source tools, enhanced collaborative features to improve efficiency, and further specialization to cater to specific data types and industry-specific requirements. Continuous innovation and community contributions will remain crucial drivers of growth in this dynamic market segment.

  7. u

    3D Microvascular Image Data and Labels for Machine Learning

    • rdr.ucl.ac.uk
    bin
    Updated Apr 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Natalie Holroyd; Claire Walsh; Emmeline Brown; Emma Brown; Yuxin Zhang; Carles Bosch Pinol; Simon Walker-Samuel (2024). 3D Microvascular Image Data and Labels for Machine Learning [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5522/04/25715604.v1
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    University College London
    Authors
    Natalie Holroyd; Claire Walsh; Emmeline Brown; Emma Brown; Yuxin Zhang; Carles Bosch Pinol; Simon Walker-Samuel
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These images and associated binary labels were collected from collaborators across multiple universities to serve as a diverse representation of biomedical images of vessel structures, for use in the training and validation of machine learning tools for vessel segmentation. The dataset contains images from a variety of imaging modalities, at different resolutions, using difference sources of contrast and featuring different organs/ pathologies. This data was use to train, test and validated a foundational model for 3D vessel segmentation, tUbeNet, which can be found on github. The paper descripting the training and validation of the model can be found here. Filenames are structured as follows: Data - [Modality]_[species Organ]_[resolution].tif Labels - [Modality]_[species Organ]_[resolution]_labels.tif Sub-volumes of larger dataset - [Modality]_[species Organ]_subvolume[dimensions in pixels].tif Manual labelling of blood vessels was carried out using Amira (2020.2, Thermo-Fisher, UK). Training data: opticalHREM_murineLiver_2.26x2.26x1.75um.tif: A high resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM) dataset, acquired in house by staining a healthy mouse liver with Eosin B and imaged using a standard HREM protocol. NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. CT_murineTumour_20x20x20um.tif: X-ray microCT images of a microvascular cast, taken from a subcutaneous mouse model of colorectal cancer (acquired in house). NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. RSOM_murineTumour_20x20um.tif: Raster-Scanning Optoacoustic Mesoscopy (RSOM) data from a subcutaneous tumour model (provided by Emma Brown, Bohndiek Group, University of Cambridge). The image data has undergone filtering to reduce the background ​(Brown et al., 2019)​. OCTA_humanRetina_24x24um.tif: retinal angiography data obtained using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) (provided by Dr Ranjan Rajendram, Moorfields Eye Hospital). Test data: MRI_porcineLiver_0.9x0.9x5mm.tif: T1-weighted Balanced Turbo Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data from a machine-perfused porcine liver, acquired in-house. Test Data MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_2.76x2.76x2.61um.tif: a subcutaneous colorectal tumour mouse model was imaged in house using Multi-fluorescence HREM in house, with Dylight 647 conjugated lectin staining the vasculature ​(Walsh et al., 2021)​. The image data has been processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by ​Walsh et al., 2020​. NB: A sub-volume of 480x480x640 voxels was manually labelled (MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_subvolume480x480x640.tif). MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_0.85x0.85x0.86um.tif: an MF-HREM image of the cortex of a mouse brain, stained with Dylight-647 conjugated lectin, was acquired in house ​(Walsh et al., 2021)​. The image data has been downsampled and processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by ​Walsh et al., 2020​. NB: A sub-volume of 1000x1000x99 voxels was manually labelled. This sub-volume is provided at full resolution and without preprocessing (MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_subvol_0.57x0.57x0.86um.tif). 2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_0.2x0.46x5.2um.tif: two-photon data of mouse olfactory bulb blood vessels, labelled with sulforhodamine 101, was kindly provided by Yuxin Zhang at the Sensory Circuits and Neurotechnology Lab, the Francis Crick Institute ​(Bosch et al., 2022)​. NB: A sub-volume of 500x500x79 voxel was manually labelled (2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_subvolume500x500x79.tif). References: ​​Bosch, C., Ackels, T., Pacureanu, A., Zhang, Y., Peddie, C. J., Berning, M., Rzepka, N., Zdora, M. C., Whiteley, I., Storm, M., Bonnin, A., Rau, C., Margrie, T., Collinson, L., & Schaefer, A. T. (2022). Functional and multiscale 3D structural investigation of brain tissue through correlative in vivo physiology, synchrotron microtomography and volume electron microscopy. Nature Communications 2022 13:1, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30199-6 ​Brown, E., Brunker, J., & Bohndiek, S. E. (2019). Photoacoustic imaging as a tool to probe the tumour microenvironment. DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1242/DMM.039636 ​Walsh, C., Holroyd, N. A., Finnerty, E., Ryan, S. G., Sweeney, P. W., Shipley, R. J., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2021). Multifluorescence High-Resolution Episcopic Microscopy for 3D Imaging of Adult Murine Organs. Advanced Photonics Research, 2(10), 2100110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADPR.202100110 ​Walsh, C., Holroyd, N., Shipley, R., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2020). Asymmetric Point Spread Function Estimation and Deconvolution for Serial-Sectioning Block-Face Imaging. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1248 CCIS, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52791-4_19 ​ 

  8. D

    Data Labeling Market Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Data Labeling Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/data-labeling-market-20383
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The data labeling market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $3.84 billion in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 28.13% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by the increasing demand for high-quality training data across various sectors, including healthcare, automotive, and finance, which heavily rely on machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI). The surge in AI adoption, particularly in areas like autonomous vehicles, medical image analysis, and fraud detection, necessitates vast quantities of accurately labeled data. The market is segmented by sourcing type (in-house vs. outsourced), data type (text, image, audio), labeling method (manual, automatic, semi-supervised), and end-user industry. Outsourcing is expected to dominate the sourcing segment due to cost-effectiveness and access to specialized expertise. Similarly, image data labeling is likely to hold a significant share, given the visual nature of many AI applications. The shift towards automation and semi-supervised techniques aims to improve efficiency and reduce labeling costs, though manual labeling will remain crucial for tasks requiring high accuracy and nuanced understanding. Geographical distribution shows strong potential across North America and Europe, with Asia-Pacific emerging as a key growth region driven by increasing technological advancements and digital transformation. Competition in the data labeling market is intense, with a mix of established players like Amazon Mechanical Turk and Appen, alongside emerging specialized companies. The market's future trajectory will likely be shaped by advancements in automation technologies, the development of more efficient labeling techniques, and the increasing need for specialized data labeling services catering to niche applications. Companies are focusing on improving the accuracy and speed of data labeling through innovations in AI-powered tools and techniques. Furthermore, the rise of synthetic data generation offers a promising avenue for supplementing real-world data, potentially addressing data scarcity challenges and reducing labeling costs in certain applications. This will, however, require careful attention to ensure that the synthetic data generated is representative of real-world data to maintain model accuracy. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global data labeling market, offering invaluable insights for businesses, investors, and researchers. The study period covers 2019-2033, with 2025 as the base and estimated year, and a forecast period of 2025-2033. We delve into market size, segmentation, growth drivers, challenges, and emerging trends, examining the impact of technological advancements and regulatory changes on this rapidly evolving sector. The market is projected to reach multi-billion dollar valuations by 2033, fueled by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train sophisticated machine learning models. Recent developments include: September 2024: The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) is poised to invest heavily in artificial intelligence, earmarking up to USD 700 million for data labeling services over the next five years. This initiative aims to enhance NGA's machine-learning capabilities, particularly in analyzing satellite imagery and other geospatial data. The agency has opted for a multi-vendor indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, emphasizing the importance of annotating raw data be it images or videos—to render it understandable for machine learning models. For instance, when dealing with satellite imagery, the focus could be on labeling distinct entities such as buildings, roads, or patches of vegetation.October 2023: Refuel.ai unveiled a new platform, Refuel Cloud, and a specialized large language model (LLM) for data labeling. Refuel Cloud harnesses advanced LLMs, including its proprietary model, to automate data cleaning, labeling, and enrichment at scale, catering to diverse industry use cases. Recognizing that clean data underpins modern AI and data-centric software, Refuel Cloud addresses the historical challenge of human labor bottlenecks in data production. With Refuel Cloud, enterprises can swiftly generate the expansive, precise datasets they require in mere minutes, a task that traditionally spanned weeks.. Key drivers for this market are: Rising Penetration of Connected Cars and Advances in Autonomous Driving Technology, Advances in Big Data Analytics based on AI and ML. Potential restraints include: Rising Penetration of Connected Cars and Advances in Autonomous Driving Technology, Advances in Big Data Analytics based on AI and ML. Notable trends are: Healthcare is Expected to Witness Remarkable Growth.

  9. f

    Data from: Towards Automatic Labeling of Exception Handling Bugs: A Case...

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Renan Vieira (2024). Towards Automatic Labeling of Exception Handling Bugs: A Case Study of 10 Years Bug-Fixing in Apache Hadoop [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22735124.v2
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 29, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Renan Vieira
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Context: Exception handling (EH) bugs stem from incorrect usage of exception handling mechanisms (EHMs) and often incur severe consequences (e.g., system downtime, data loss, and security risk). Tracking EH bugs is particularly relevant for contemporary systems (e.g., cloud- and AI-based systems), in which the software's sophisticated logic is an additional threat to the correct use of the EHM. On top of that, bug reporters seldom can tag EH bugs --- since it may require an encompassing knowledge of the software's EH strategy. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no automated procedure to identify EH bugs from report descriptions.Objective: First, we aim to evaluate the extent to which Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to reliably label EH bugs using the text fields from bug reports (e.g., summary, description, and comments). Second, we aim to provide a reliably labeled dataset that the community can use in future endeavors. Overall, we expect our work to raise the community's awareness regarding the importance of EH bugs.Method: We manually analyzed 4,516 bug reports from the four main components of Apache’s Hadoop project, out of which we labeled ~20% (943) as EH bugs. We also labeled 2,584 non-EH bugs analyzing their bug-fixing code and creating a dataset composed of 7,100 bug reports. Then, we used word embedding techniques (Bag-of-Words and TF-IDF) to summarize the textual fields of bug reports. Subsequently, we used these embeddings to fit five classes of ML methods and evaluate them on unseen data. We also evaluated a pre-trained transformer-based model using the complete textual fields. We have also evaluated whether considering only EH keywords is enough to achieve high predictive performance.Results: Our results show that using a pre-trained DistilBERT with a linear layer trained with our proposed dataset can reasonably label EH bugs, achieving ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.88. The combination of NLP and ML traditional techniques achieved ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.74 and recall up to 0.56. As a sanity check, we also evaluate methods using embeddings extracted solely from keywords. Considering ROC-AUC as the primary concern, for the majority of ML methods tested, the analysis suggests that keywords alone are not sufficient to characterize reports of EH bugs, although this can change based on other metrics (such as recall and precision) or ML methods (e.g., Random Forest).Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the problem of automatic labeling of EH bugs. Based on our results, we can conclude that the use of ML techniques, specially transformer-base models, sounds promising to automate the task of labeling EH bugs. Overall, we hope (i) that our work will contribute towards raising awareness around EH bugs; and (ii) that our (publicly available) dataset will serve as a benchmarking dataset, paving the way for follow-up works. Additionally, our findings can be used to build tools that help maintainers flesh out EH bugs during the triage process.

  10. D

    Data Labeling Solution and Services Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Data Labeling Solution and Services Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/data-labeling-solution-and-services-1970298
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The Data Labeling Solutions and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the escalating demand for high-quality training data to fuel the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. The market, estimated at $10 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $45 billion by 2033. This significant growth is fueled by several key factors. The increasing adoption of AI across diverse sectors, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, is creating a massive need for labeled datasets. Furthermore, the complexity of AI models is constantly increasing, requiring larger and more sophisticated labeled datasets. The emergence of new data labeling techniques, such as synthetic data generation and automated labeling tools, is also accelerating market expansion. However, challenges remain, including the high cost and time associated with data labeling, the need for skilled professionals, and concerns surrounding data privacy and security. This necessitates innovative solutions and collaborative efforts to address these limitations and fully realize the potential of AI. The market segmentation reveals a diverse landscape. The automotive sector is a significant driver, heavily relying on data labeling for autonomous driving systems and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). Healthcare is another key segment, leveraging data labeling for medical image analysis, diagnostics, and drug discovery. Financial services utilize data labeling for fraud detection, risk assessment, and algorithmic trading. While these sectors dominate currently, the "Others" segment, encompassing various emerging applications, is poised for substantial growth. Geographically, North America currently holds the largest market share, attributed to the high concentration of AI companies and technological advancements. However, the Asia-Pacific region is projected to witness the fastest growth rate due to the increasing adoption of AI and the availability of a large, skilled workforce. Competition within the market is fierce, with established players and emerging startups vying for market share. This competitive landscape drives innovation and offers diverse solutions to meet the evolving needs of the industry.

  11. f

    A comparison of overall significance for each method. We obtain this score...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dustin Wright; Isabelle Augenstein (2025). A comparison of overall significance for each method. We obtain this score by comparing each method across all datasets: if method 1 is statistically significantly better than method 2, we add 1 to its score. If it is significantly worse, we subtract 1. If there is no difference, then we add 0 to the score. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323064.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Dustin Wright; Isabelle Augenstein
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A comparison of overall significance for each method. We obtain this score by comparing each method across all datasets: if method 1 is statistically significantly better than method 2, we add 1 to its score. If it is significantly worse, we subtract 1. If there is no difference, then we add 0 to the score.

  12. D

    Data Labeling Solution and Services Report

    • archivemarketresearch.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Archive Market Research (2025). Data Labeling Solution and Services Report [Dataset]. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/data-labeling-solution-and-services-52815
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Archive Market Research
    License

    https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global Data Labeling Solution and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $70 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by the burgeoning need for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI models. Key growth drivers include the expanding application of AI in various industries like automotive (autonomous vehicles), healthcare (medical image analysis), and financial services (fraud detection). The increasing availability of diverse data types (text, image/video, audio) further contributes to market growth. However, challenges such as the high cost of data labeling, data privacy concerns, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and execute labeling projects pose certain restraints on market expansion. Segmentation by application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, others) and data type (text, image/video, audio) reveals distinct growth trajectories within the market. The automotive and healthcare sectors currently dominate, but the government and financial services segments are showing promising growth potential. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk, Appen, and Labelbox are leading the market, leveraging their expertise in crowdsourcing, automation, and specialized data labeling solutions. However, the market shows strong potential for innovation, particularly in the development of automated data labeling tools and the expansion of services into niche areas. Regional analysis indicates strong market penetration in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and robust research and development efforts. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years fueled by rapid technological advancements and a rising demand for AI solutions. Further investment in R&D focused on automation, improved data security, and the development of more effective data labeling methodologies will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of this rapidly expanding market.

  13. D

    Data Labeling Tools Report

    • marketresearchforecast.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jun 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Research Forecast (2025). Data Labeling Tools Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/reports/data-labeling-tools-540211
    Explore at:
    doc, pdf, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Research Forecast
    License

    https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global market for data labeling tools is experiencing robust growth, driven by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in the burgeoning fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). The market, estimated at $2 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $10 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the increasing adoption of AI across diverse industries like automotive, healthcare, and finance, the rising complexity of AI models requiring larger and more meticulously labeled datasets, and the emergence of innovative data labeling techniques like active learning and transfer learning. The market is segmented by tool type (e.g., image annotation, text annotation, video annotation), deployment mode (cloud, on-premise), and end-user industry. Competitive landscape analysis reveals a mix of established players like Amazon, Google, and Lionbridge, alongside emerging innovative startups offering specialized solutions. Despite the significant growth potential, the market faces certain challenges. The high cost of data labeling, particularly for complex datasets, can be a barrier to entry for smaller companies. Ensuring data quality and accuracy remains a crucial concern, as errors in labeled data can significantly impact the performance of AI models. Furthermore, the need for skilled data annotators and the ethical considerations surrounding data privacy and bias in labeled datasets pose ongoing challenges to market expansion. To overcome these hurdles, market players are focusing on developing automated labeling tools, improving data quality control mechanisms, and prioritizing data privacy and ethical labeling practices. The future of the data labeling tools market is bright, with continued innovation and increasing demand expected to drive significant growth throughout the forecast period.

  14. Z

    Automatic labelling of HeLa "Kyoto" cells using Deep Learning tools

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jul 17, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Romain Guiet (2024). Automatic labelling of HeLa "Kyoto" cells using Deep Learning tools [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_6140063
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 17, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Romain Guiet
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Name: Automatic labelling of HeLa “Kyoto” cells using Deep Learning tools

    Data type: Microscopy images from the dataset “HeLa “Kyoto” cells under the scope”, Brightfield (BF), Digital Phase Contrast (DPC, either “raw” or “square-rooted”), Tubulin and H2B fluorescent channel, paired with their corresponding nuclei or cell/cyto label images.

    Labels images: Labels images were generated using the script “prepare_trainingDataset_cellpose.ijm”.

    Briefly, for 5 defined time-points (1,10,50,100,150), channels of interest were duplicated, resaved and :

    • nuclei label images were obtained using StarDist on H2B channel

    • cell label images were obtained using Cellpose on Tubulin and H2B channels

    A quick visual inspection of the resulting label images concluded that they were satisfying enough, despite certainly not being perfect.

    Notes :

    • This labelling strategy:

    o will not produce 100% accurate labels, but they might be more reproducible than labels generated by humans and are (definitely) much faster to obtain.

    o is NOT a recommended way of generating labels images, but for educational purposes.

    • The fluorescent channels are part of the dataset to ease the process of review of the labels and are NOT used for training. We generated the labels from the fluorescent channels to later predict labels from the BF or DPC channels only. As such, the fluorescent channels should not be “reused” with our labels during training.

    File format: .tif (16-bit)

    Image size: 540x540 (Pixel size: 0.299 nm)

    NOTE: This dataset uses the “HeLa “Kyoto” cells under the scope” dataset (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6139958) to automatically generate annotations

    NOTE: This dataset was used to train cellpose models in the following Zenodo entry https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6140111

  15. i

    A collection of nine multi-label text classification datasets

    • ieee-dataport.org
    Updated Nov 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yiming Wang (2024). A collection of nine multi-label text classification datasets [Dataset]. https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/collection-nine-multi-label-text-classification-datasets
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 4, 2024
    Authors
    Yiming Wang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    RCV1

  16. A

    AI Data Labeling Solution Report

    • archivemarketresearch.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Archive Market Research (2025). AI Data Labeling Solution Report [Dataset]. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/ai-data-labeling-solution-56186
    Explore at:
    ppt, doc, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Archive Market Research
    License

    https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The AI data labeling solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train and improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of AI applications across diverse sectors, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, necessitates vast amounts of labeled data. Cloud-based solutions are gaining prominence due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation techniques and the emergence of specialized AI data labeling platforms are contributing to market expansion. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns, the need for highly skilled professionals, and the complexities of handling diverse data formats continue to restrain market growth to some extent. The market segmentation reveals that the cloud-based solutions segment is expected to dominate due to its inherent advantages over on-premise solutions. In terms of application, the automotive sector is projected to exhibit the fastest growth, driven by the increasing adoption of autonomous driving technology and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). The healthcare industry is also a major contributor, with the rise of AI-powered diagnostic tools and personalized medicine driving demand for accurate medical image and data labeling. Geographically, North America currently holds a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is poised for rapid growth owing to increasing investments in AI and technological advancements. The competitive landscape is marked by a diverse range of established players and emerging startups, fostering innovation and competition within the market. The continued evolution of AI and its integration across various industries ensures the continued expansion of the AI data labeling solution market in the coming years.

  17. D

    Data Labeling Software Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jun 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Data Labeling Software Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/data-labeling-software-1369782
    Explore at:
    ppt, pdf, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The data labeling software market, valued at $63 million in 2025, is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 17.3% from 2025 to 2033. This surge is driven by the escalating demand for high-quality training data to fuel the advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across various sectors. The increasing complexity of AI models necessitates more sophisticated and efficient data labeling processes, pushing companies to adopt specialized software solutions. Key trends include the rise of automated labeling tools, improved integration with existing ML workflows, and a growing emphasis on data privacy and security. While the market faces challenges such as the high cost of implementation and the need for skilled personnel, the overall outlook remains positive due to the expanding applications of AI in diverse fields like autonomous vehicles, healthcare, and finance. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with established players like AWS and newer entrants vying for market share through innovation and strategic partnerships. This growth is further fueled by the increasing availability of large datasets and the growing demand for explainable AI, which necessitates meticulous data labeling practices. The market's segmentation, although not explicitly provided, likely includes categories based on deployment (cloud-based vs. on-premise), labeling type (image, text, video, audio), and industry vertical (healthcare, automotive, retail, etc.). The companies mentioned – AWS, Figure Eight, Hive, Playment, and others – represent a mix of established tech giants and specialized data labeling providers, reflecting the diverse technological solutions and service offerings within the market. The geographical distribution is expected to be concentrated in regions with strong AI development and adoption, with North America and Europe likely holding significant market shares. Predicting precise regional breakdowns and segment sizes requires additional data, however, given the overall market trajectory and industry trends, the future appears bright for data labeling software providers.

  18. Open Source Data Labelling Tool Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Open Source Data Labelling Tool Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-open-source-data-labelling-tool-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Open Source Data Labelling Tool Market Outlook



    The global market size for Open Source Data Labelling Tools was valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 4.6 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.2% during the forecast period. This significant growth can be attributed to the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across various industries, which drives the need for accurately labelled data to train these technologies effectively.



    The rapid advancement and integration of AI and ML in numerous sectors serve as a primary growth factor for the Open Source Data Labelling Tool market. With the proliferation of big data, organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of high-quality, annotated data sets to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of their AI models. The open-source nature of these tools offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, making them an attractive choice for businesses of all sizes, especially startups and SMEs, which further fuels market growth.



    Another key driver is the rising demand for automated data labelling solutions. Manual data labelling is a time-consuming and error-prone task, leading many organizations to seek automated tools that can swiftly and accurately label large datasets. Open source data labelling tools, often augmented with advanced features like natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision, provide a scalable solution to this challenge. This trend is particularly pronounced in data-intensive industries such as healthcare, automotive, and finance, where the precision of data labelling can significantly impact operational outcomes.



    Additionally, the collaborative nature of open-source communities contributes to the market's growth. Continuous improvements and updates are driven by a global community of developers and researchers, ensuring that these tools remain at the cutting edge of technology. This ongoing innovation not only boosts the functionality and reliability of open-source data labelling tools but also fosters a sense of community and shared knowledge, encouraging more organizations to adopt these solutions.



    In the realm of data labelling, Premium Annotation Tools have emerged as a significant player, offering advanced features that cater to the needs of enterprises seeking high-quality data annotation. These tools often come equipped with enhanced functionalities such as collaborative interfaces, real-time updates, and integration capabilities with existing AI systems. The premium nature of these tools ensures that they are designed to handle complex datasets with precision, thereby reducing the margin of error in data labelling processes. As businesses increasingly prioritize accuracy and efficiency, the demand for premium solutions is on the rise, providing a competitive edge in sectors where data quality is paramount.



    From a regional perspective, North America holds a significant share of the market due to the robust presence of tech giants and a well-established IT infrastructure. The region's strong focus on AI research and development, coupled with substantial investments in technology, drives the demand for data labelling tools. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is expected to exhibit the highest growth rate during the forecast period, attributed to the rapid digital transformation and increasing AI adoption across countries like China, India, and Japan.



    Component Analysis



    When dissecting the Open Source Data Labelling Tool market by component, it is evident that the segment is bifurcated into software and services. The software segment dominates the market, primarily due to the extensive range of features and functionalities that open-source data labelling software offers. These tools are customizable and can be tailored to meet specific needs, making them highly versatile and efficient. The software segment is expected to continue its dominance as more organizations seek comprehensive solutions that integrate seamlessly with their existing systems.



    The services segment, while smaller in comparison, plays a crucial role in the overall market landscape. Services include support, training, and consulting, which are vital for organizations to effectively implement and utilize open-source data labelling tools. As the adoption of these tools grows, so does the demand for professional services that can aid in deployment, customization

  19. f

    The accuracy of each annotation method with respect to the expert...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dustin Wright; Isabelle Augenstein (2025). The accuracy of each annotation method with respect to the expert annotations in each dataset. Aggregating maintains best or near-best accuracy across tasks. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323064.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Dustin Wright; Isabelle Augenstein
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The accuracy of each annotation method with respect to the expert annotations in each dataset. Aggregating maintains best or near-best accuracy across tasks.

  20. A

    AI Data Labeling Service Report

    • marketreportanalytics.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 9, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Report Analytics (2025). AI Data Labeling Service Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/reports/ai-data-labeling-service-72378
    Explore at:
    ppt, doc, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Report Analytics
    License

    https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The AI data labeling service market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $5 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a market value exceeding $20 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the burgeoning demand for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI algorithms across applications such as autonomous vehicles, medical image analysis, and personalized retail experiences is a primary driver. Secondly, the increasing availability of sophisticated data labeling tools and platforms, along with the emergence of specialized service providers, is streamlining the data labeling process and making it more accessible to businesses of all sizes. Furthermore, advancements in automation and machine learning are improving the efficiency and scalability of data labeling, thereby reducing costs and accelerating project timelines. The major application segments, including automotive, healthcare, and e-commerce, are contributing significantly to this market growth, with the automotive industry projected to remain a leading adopter due to the rapid advancement of self-driving technology. However, challenges remain. The high cost of data annotation, particularly for complex datasets requiring human expertise, can pose a significant barrier to entry for smaller companies. The need for maintaining data privacy and security, especially in regulated industries like healthcare, also requires careful consideration and investment in robust security measures. Despite these restraints, the overall market outlook remains highly positive, with significant opportunities for both established players and new entrants. The continuous advancements in AI technologies and the expanding application of AI across various industries ensure that the demand for high-quality, labeled data will continue to fuel market growth in the foreseeable future. Regional growth will be strongest in North America and Asia Pacific, driven by strong technological innovation and a large pool of skilled labor.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2022). Dataset: An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/dataset-an-open-combinatorial-diffraction-dataset-including-consensus-human-and-machine-le-0de06
Organization logo

Dataset: An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 29, 2022
Dataset provided by
National Institute of Standards and Technologyhttp://www.nist.gov/
Description

The open dataset, software, and other files accompanying the manuscript "An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models," submitted for publication to Integrated Materials and Manufacturing Innovations.Machine learning and autonomy are increasingly prevalent in materials science, but existing models are often trained or tuned using idealized data as absolute ground truths. In actual materials science, "ground truth" is often a matter of interpretation and is more readily determined by consensus. Here we present the data, software, and other files for a study using as-obtained diffraction data as a test case for evaluating the performance of machine learning models in the presence of differing expert opinions. We demonstrate that experts with similar backgrounds can disagree greatly even for something as intuitive as using diffraction to identify the start and end of a phase transformation. We then use a logarithmic likelihood method to evaluate the performance of machine learning models in relation to the consensus expert labels and their variance. We further illustrate this method's efficacy in ranking a number of state-of-the-art phase mapping algorithms. We propose a materials data challenge centered around the problem of evaluating models based on consensus with uncertainty. The data, labels, and code used in this study are all available online at data.gov, and the interested reader is encouraged to replicate and improve the existing models or to propose alternative methods for evaluating algorithmic performance.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu