11 datasets found
  1. a

    Lake County Parcel

    • california-parcel-update-agis.hub.arcgis.com
    • project-gallery-agis.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 29, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Advanced GIS Lab (2023). Lake County Parcel [Dataset]. https://california-parcel-update-agis.hub.arcgis.com/maps/6876439e560c457b95e63d99659ed04d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 29, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Advanced GIS Lab
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Data Source: The data was downloaded from the Lake County, CA GIS portal, the 'parcel.shp' and 'zoning.shp' were spatially joined. Data was enriched with Fire Hazard Zone, Flood Risk Zone, Fault Zones, Landslide Risk, Liquifaction Zones, Drought Conditions, and the potential for Renewable Energy (Solar Radiation and Wind Speed) layers, in addition to the layers provided by the county. The table schema is detailed below.

  2. BOE TRA 2025 co17

    • cdtfa.hub.arcgis.com
    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jun 9, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (2025). BOE TRA 2025 co17 [Dataset]. https://cdtfa.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/CDTFA::lake-2025-roll-year?layer=1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Tax and Fee Administrationhttp://cdtfa.ca.gov/
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This shapefile contains tax rate area (TRA) boundaries in Lake County for the specified assessment roll year. Boundary alignment is based on the 2017 county parcel map. A tax rate area (TRA) is a geographic area within the jurisdiction of a unique combination of cities, schools, and revenue districts that utilize the regular city or county assessment roll, per Government Code 54900. Each TRA is assigned a six-digit numeric identifier, referred to as a TRA number. TRA = tax rate area number

  3. n

    Maps of Vegetation Types and Physiographic Features, Toolik Lake Area,...

    • access.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • +3more
    zip
    Updated Dec 31, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Maps of Vegetation Types and Physiographic Features, Toolik Lake Area, Alaska [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1380
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 31, 2018
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1990 - Aug 31, 2014
    Area covered
    Description

    This data set provides the spatial distributions of vegetation types, soil carbon, and physiographic features in the Toolik Lake area, Alaska. Specific attributes include vegetation, percent water, glacial geology, soil carbon, a digital elevation model (DEM), surficial geology and surficial geomorphology.

  4. n

    Pre-Delta-X: Aboveground Biomass and Vegetation Maps, Wax Lake Delta, LA,...

    • access.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • +3more
    zip
    Updated Apr 3, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). Pre-Delta-X: Aboveground Biomass and Vegetation Maps, Wax Lake Delta, LA, USA, 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1821
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2021
    Time period covered
    Oct 17, 2016
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset includes aboveground biomass (AGB) and vegetation of herbaceous and forest wetland at 5.4 m resolution across the Wax Lake Delta (WLD) in Southern Louisiana, USA, within the Mississippi River Delta (MRD) floodplain. Vegetation classes were derived from Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer-Next Generation (AVIRIS-NG) imagery acquired over the Atchafalaya Basin and the Terrebonne Basin in October 2016 in combination with a digital elevation model. The AVIRIS-NG surface reflectance data were also combined with L-band Uninhabited Airborne Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) HV backscatter and scattering component values from coincident vegetation sample sites to develop and test AGB models for emergent herbaceous and forested wetland vegetation. This study used the integrated airborne data from AVIRIS-NG and UAVSAR to assess the instruments' unique capabilities in combination for estimating AGB in coastal deltaic wetlands. The 5.4 m resolution vegetation classification map for the WLD study area was then used to apply the best models to estimate AGB across the WLD.

  5. Aspen Delineation - Aspen Delineation Project [ds362]

    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Oct 23, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2023). Aspen Delineation - Aspen Delineation Project [ds362] [Dataset]. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/aspen-delineation-aspen-delineation-project-ds362
    Explore at:
    zip, csv, arcgis geoservices rest api, geojson, kml, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 23, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The database represents delineations of aspen stands, where aspen assessment data was gathered. Aspen assessment information corresponding to this polygon layer can be found in the layer: ADP_POINT. Data collection occurred in the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (Placer and Eldorado Counties); Alturas Field Office-BLM (Modoc County); California Tahoe Conservancy (Placer and Eldorado Counties), the Stanislaus National Forest (Tuolumne County); Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest(Alpine County); and Tahoe National Forest (Nevada and Sierra Counties); and the California Department of Fish and Game (Modoc County). This is a multi-agency contributed dataset gathered by the agencies listed above during the summers of 2001-2005. Assessment data and GIS delineations were collected using a standardized protocol developed by members of the Aspen Delineation Project, a cooperative project of the US Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management and the California Department of Fish and Game. Surveying was completed by foot surveys of watersheds surveyed. This is the current completed data set for aspen distribution of land administered by these agencies. Data captures location of aspen stands and vegetative characteristics of the aspen stand, and if browsing of the aspen was present or absent. Also associated with this database is a point layer (ADP_POINT) containing aspen stands delineated in conjunction with the aspen assessment information. Data Compilation: The Aspen Delineation Project (ADP) is a collaborative effort of the U.S. Forest Service's Pacific Southwest Region, the California Department of Fish and Games Resource Assessment Program, and the California Office of Bureau of Land Management. Principal Investigator for ADP is David Burton; visit: www.aspensite.org for more information regarding the ADP. The Department of Fish and Games, Resource Assessment Program compiled this information from the collaborating agencies and other researchers, and formatted the data into a common database for the purpose of facilitating access to data related to the conservation of Quaking Aspen in California. This information portal falls within the ADP goals to help agencies and land managers identify, map, treat, and monitor aspen habitats. This dataset is a portion of a master database compiled during a year long effort in 2005 to pull together current GIS layers and maps depicting Aspen communities in California.

  6. c

    Elk Migration Lines - West Goose Lake - 1999-2002, 2018-2020 [ds2900] GIS...

    • map.dfg.ca.gov
    Updated Sep 20, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Elk Migration Lines - West Goose Lake - 1999-2002, 2018-2020 [ds2900] GIS Dataset [Dataset]. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds2900.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 20, 2022
    Description

    CDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: Erin Zulliger, Description: Migration line locations for Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis nelsoni) from the West Goose Lake herd, Modoc County, California, and Lake and Klamath Counties, Oregon. Migration lines were developed in Migration Mapper using GPS locations from collared elk.

  7. c

    Elk Migration Corridors - West Goose Lake - 1999-2002, 2018-2020 [ds2901]...

    • map.dfg.ca.gov
    Updated Dec 7, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Elk Migration Corridors - West Goose Lake - 1999-2002, 2018-2020 [ds2901] GIS Dataset [Dataset]. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds2901.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2022
    Description

    CDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: Erin Zulliger, Description: Migration corridor, stopover, and winter range locations for Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis nelsoni) developed by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for the West Goose Lake herd, Modoc County, California, and Lake and Klamath Counties, Oregon. Corridors, stopovers, and winter ranges were developed in Migration Mapper with Brownian Bridge Movement Models using GPS locations from collared elk.

  8. a

    Centerlines

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gisopendata-countyofriverside.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 13, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Riverside County Mapping Portal (2016). Centerlines [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/CountyofRiverside::centerlines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Riverside County Mapping Portal
    Area covered
    Description

    This data set of line features represent Riverside County's recorded street centerlines.This data set was designed to carry out functions of the Transportation department and is not a true street network layer. Centerlines do not have complete "connectivity" due to the fact that this layer is primarily roads that have been recorded but does not necessarily contain all roads. OBJECTID - Internal feature number. STNAME - Recorded name of the centerline. TYPE - Used to classify roads, primarily by surface type. Description of the codes found in the attribute "TYPE" TYPE DESCRIPTION C01 Federal Aid Interstate C02 State Highways C03 F.A.U. Maintained C04 F.A.S. Maintained C05 Paved Surface Maintained C06 Paved Surface (Traveled) C07 Graveled Surface Maintained C08 Graveled Surface (Traveled) C09 Dirt Surface Maintained C10 Dirt Surface (Traveled) C11 Accepted For Public Use C12 Non-County/Accepted for P.U. C13 Non-County road C14 Vacated C15 Abandon C16 Maintained F.A.U./Non-County C17 Maintained F.A.S./Non-County C18 Maintained Paved/Accepted C19 Maintained Paved/Non-County C20 Maintained Paved/Vacated C21 Maintained Gravel/Accepted C22 Maintained Gravel/Non-County C23 Maintained Gravel/Vacated C24 Maintained Dirt/Accepted C25 Maintained Dirt/Non-County C26 Maintained Dirt/Vacated C27 Accepted/Vacated C28 Maintained Under Contract C29 City Road C30 Paved Maintained/Dirt Maintained C31 Dedicated and Accepted/CFD Maintained W01 Maintained for City W02 Maintained for City/Non-County W03 Maintained for City/Non-County (Reversed) W04 Maintained for City/Accepted W05 F.A.U. Maintained/Maintained for City W06 Dirt Surface Maintained/Maintained for City W07 Paved Surface Maintained/Maintained for City W08 Graveled Surface Maintained/Maintained for City Z01 Traffic Division Modeling Connectivity Use Only (The "W" series within the TYPE field were initially created for the City of Wildomar, but have had their application expanded to include any Centerline where the County maintains the road for a City - typically for a limited period after a City's incorporation. The "W" will continue as a convention to make it easy to distinguish such roads from roads normally maintained by the County, even though it is understood that the "W" will lose its initial association with the City of Wildomar over time.). GENPLANTYPE - General Plan Classification of the Road. Not corrected for the RCLIS 2003 updated at thsi time. Description of the codes found in the attribute "GENPLANTYPE" GENPLANTYPE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 01 101 FREEWAY 02 201 EXPRESSWAY 03 301 URBAN ARTERIAL 04 304 URBAN ARTERIAL (PROPOSED) 05 401 ARTERIAL 06 404 ARTERIAL (PROPOSED) 07 501 MOUNTAIN ARTERIAL 08 504 MOUNTAIN ARTERIAL (PROPOSED) 09 13 MAJOR 10 16 MAJOR (PROPOSED) 11 21 SECONDARY 12 24 SECONDARY (PROPOSED) 13 801 SPECIFIC PLAN ROAD 14 804 SPECIFIC PLAN ROAD (PROPOSED) 15 25 SCENIC ROUTE 16 28 SCENIC ROUTE (PROPOSED) 17 0 COLLECTOR(PROPOSED) indicates that the road is part of the "General PLan Alignment" but does not currently exist as a legal centerline. This type of centerline will be stored in the CENTERLINEREF data set. DIRECTION - Represents the direction of traffic flow. Presently not supported. NAMEID - Numerical representation of the recorded street name. Unique STNAME and NAMEID values are tracked in the STNMS table. RDNUMBER - Used by the Transportation Department to identify county maintained roads. Used for accounting purposes. SEGNUMBER - Used in combination with the RDNUMBER to uniquely identify an individual centerline, segment, or length. No longer supported. FLAG - Indicates whether or not an arc will be used in a street network data set. Presently not used because there is no street network data set. L_F_ADD - The starting address for the left side of the street. L_T_ADD - The ending address for the left side of the street. R_F_ADD - The starting address for the right side of the street. R_T_ADD - The ending address for the right side of the street. PRE_DIR - The street direction prefix. Example: 'E' for east. STREET_NAME - The base legal street name of the centerline. Example: "MAIN". STREET_TYPE - The Street Name Type abbreviation. Example: 'ST' for street. Valid values for the STREET_TYPE field are: ' ' - ' ' (No Type is a space) AVE - AVENUE BLVD - BOULEVARD CIR - CIRCLE CT - COURT CV - COVE DR - DRIVE EXPY - EXPRESSWAY FWY - FREEWAY HWY - HIGHWAY LN - LANE LOOP - LOOP PATH - PATH PKWY - PARKWAY PL - PLACE PT - POINT RD - ROAD SQ - SQUARE ST- STREET TER - TERRACE TRL - TRAIL WALK - WALK WAY - WAY SUF_DIR - The street direction suffix. Example: "N' for north. TRACT - The tract map number in which the centerline can be found. MODIFIED - Modified Date CREATED - Created Date SOURCE_NOTES - References to legal documentation related to the Centerline found during research, including such things as recordation histroy, name change history, and acceptance for or termination of maintenance information, FULL_NAME - Name used to construct ROUTE_NAME field values. Used to detect changes in the STNAME value. AREA_PLAN_ABBREVIATION - Abbreviated Area Plan Name used to create ROUTE_NAME Valid values for AREA_PLAN_ABBREVIATION are: DESCN - Desert Center ECDES - East County/Desert ECVAP - Eastern Coachella Valley Plan ELSIN - Lake Elsinore EVALE - Eastvale HIGHG - Highgrove HVWIN - Harvest Valley/Winchester JURUP - Jurupa LAKEV - Lakeview/Nuevo LMATH - Lake Mathews MARCH - March MEADV - Mead Valley PASS - Pass Area PVERD - Palo Verde Valley RECHE - Reche Canyon REMAP - REMAP (Riverside Extended Mountain Area Plan) RIVER - Riverside/Corona/Norco SANJA - San Jacinto Valley SBCO - San Bernardino County SUNCI - Sun City/Menifee Valley SWAP - Southwest Area Plan TEMES - Temescal Valley WCVAP - Western Coachella Valley Area Plan SUBROUTE - Optional Identifier used to build ROUTE_NAME to separate branches or distiguish discontinuous portions of a street within an area plan that are unlikely to ever form a continuous route. ROUTE_NAME - Primary field used to construct a Linear Referencing derivative of the Centerlines layer. THis values is a component of ROUTE_ALT1 and ROUTE_ALT2 and is overriden by those fields when they have values. ROUTE_DIR1 - Used with ROUTE_NAME to build values for ROUTE_ALT1 when there is a value assigned. ROUTE_ALT1 - First Alternative ROUTE_NAME value. Typically used for one-way streets that are oriented Norh or East. ROUTE_DIR2 - Used with ROUTE_NAME to build values for ROUTE_ALT2 when there is a value assigned. ROUTE_ALT2 - Second Alternative ROUTE_NAME value. Typically used for one-way streets that are oriented Souh or West. BUILD_PRIORITY - Used to create Linear Referenced Routes. Sets the corner from which to build routes. Valuid values for BUILD_PRIORITY are: UL - Upper Left (Default) LL - Lower Left UR - Upper Right LR - Lower Right LINE_LINK - Geometric ID of Centerline arc. Made up of the From X/Y coordinate, the To X/Y coordinate and the Length. Used to detect geometric changes to an existing Centerline. CL_ID - Duplicate of OBJECTID. USed for detecting newly added segments to the network each week or to relate and join exported versions of CENTERLINES back to the original CENTERLINE feature class.FROM_X_COORDINATE, FROM_Y_COORDINATE, TO_X_COORDINATE and TO_Y_COORDINATE: The coordinate data for the end points of the line in numeric format.ROUTE_ORIENTED: Indicates if the line is drawn in the direction that corresponds to the Routes created based on the ROUTE_NAME fields.TRAVEL_DIRECTIONS: Indicates whether the road can be driven and in what directions. Values include "Both Ways", "From-To", "To-From" and "No Ways".CA_ROAD_SYSTEM_PAGE: The map page location of the California Roadway System (CRS) Maps containing the Centerline: See http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/CA_ROAD_SYSTEM_INDEX: The map index grid location of the California Roadway System (CRS) Maps containing the Centerline: See http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/CA_FUNCTIONAL_CLASS: The California Functional Classification of the Roadway per the CRS maps. Only classifications between 1 and 5 may qualify for state and federal funds. Classifications include:1 - Interstate2 - Other Freeway or Expressway3 - Other Principal Arterial4 - Minor Arterial5 - Major Collector6 - Minor Collector7 - LocalFEDERAL_ROUTE and FEDERAL_ROUTE_TYPE: The number of the Federal Interstate or U.S. Highway and the operational type of the facility, where applicable.STATE_ROUTE and STATE_ROUTE_TYPE: The number of the State Route or Highway and the operational type of the facility, where applicable.COUNTY_ROUTE: The number of a County Route.CITY_LEFT or CITY_RIGHT: The City or Community name to the left or right of the Centerline. Used for address geolocators.STATE: CA for Califonia. For geolocators that use the State field.ZIP_LEFT or ZIP_RIGHT: The ZIP code to the left or right of the Centerline. Used for address geolocators.FULL_NAME_MIXED_CASE: The full street name in mixed Upper and Lower case letters, sometimes also called Title case. May be used for labeling and geolocators.

  9. n

    Arctic Alaska Vegetation, Geobotanical, Physiographic Maps, 1993-2005

    • access.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • +4more
    zip
    Updated Dec 31, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Arctic Alaska Vegetation, Geobotanical, Physiographic Maps, 1993-2005 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1353
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 31, 2018
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 1993 - Mar 30, 2005
    Area covered
    Description

    This data set provides the spatial distributions of vegetation types, geobotanical characteristics, and physiographic features for the Arctic tundra region of Alaska for the period 1993-2005. Specific attributes include dominant vegetation, bioclimate subzones, floristic subprovinces, landscape types, lake coverage, and substrate chemistry. This data set generally includes areas North and West of the forest boundary and excludes areas that have a boreal flora such as the Aleutian Islands and alpine tundra regions south of treeline.

  10. n

    Data from: The Long Valley Caldera GIS Database

    • access.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov
    Updated Apr 9, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). The Long Valley Caldera GIS Database [Dataset]. https://access.earthdata.nasa.gov/collections/C2232411630-CEOS_EXTRA
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2021
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1975 - Dec 31, 2001
    Area covered
    Description

    The Long Valley Caldera GIS Database provides an overview of the studies being conducted by the Long Valley Observatory in eastern California from 1975 to 2001. The database includes geologic, monitoring, and topographic datasets related to Long Valley caldera. The CD-ROM contains a scan of the original geologic map of the Long Valley region by R. Bailey. Real-time data of the current activity of the caldera (including earthquakes, ground deformation and the release of volcanic gas), information about volcanic hazards and the USGS response plan are available online at the Long Valley observatory web page (http://lvo.wr.usgs.gov). If you have any comments or questions about this database, please contact the Scientist in Charge of the Long Valley observatory.

    [Summary provided by the USGS.]

  11. a

    Data from: Hydrants

    • gis-monomammoth.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 13, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mono County & the Town of Mammoth Lakes, CA (2018). Hydrants [Dataset]. https://gis-monomammoth.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/hydrants
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Mono County & the Town of Mammoth Lakes, CA
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset depicts the locations of fire hydrants within Mono County, CA excluding the Town of Mammoth Lakes fire hydrants which are managed by the Mammoth Community Water District and the Mammoth Lakes Fire Department.

  12. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Advanced GIS Lab (2023). Lake County Parcel [Dataset]. https://california-parcel-update-agis.hub.arcgis.com/maps/6876439e560c457b95e63d99659ed04d

Lake County Parcel

Explore at:
9 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Apr 29, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
Advanced GIS Lab
License

MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Description

Data Source: The data was downloaded from the Lake County, CA GIS portal, the 'parcel.shp' and 'zoning.shp' were spatially joined. Data was enriched with Fire Hazard Zone, Flood Risk Zone, Fault Zones, Landslide Risk, Liquifaction Zones, Drought Conditions, and the potential for Renewable Energy (Solar Radiation and Wind Speed) layers, in addition to the layers provided by the county. The table schema is detailed below.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu