Final damage assessment layer from Lane County. Point of contact is Adam Vellutini, Lane County GIS. This layer is a copy of date, found here: https://geo.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=353e232021a64cf7878539f352f02feb

This Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase:

Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill.

Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County.

R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.

This data set was developed to provide geologic map GIS of the Coeur d'Alene 1:100,000 quadrangle for use in future spatial analysis by a variety of users. These data can be printed in a variety of ways to display various geologic features or used for digital analysis and modeling. This database is not meant to be used or displayed at any scale larger than 1:100,000 (e.g. 1:62,500 or 1:24,000).

The digital geologic map of the Coeur d'Alene 1:100,000 quadrangle was compiled from preliminary digital datasets [Athol, Coeur d'Alene, Kellogg, Kingston, Lakeview, Lane, and Spirit Lake 15-minute quadrangles] prepared by the Idaho Geological Survey from A. B. Griggs (unpublished field maps), supplemented by Griggs (1973) and by digital data from Bookstrom and others (1999) and Derkey and others (1996). The digital geologic map database can be queried in many ways to produce a variety of derivative geologic maps.

This GIS consists of two major Arc/Info data sets: one line and polygon file (cda100k) containing geologic contacts and structures (lines) and geologic map rock units (polygons), and one point file (cda100kp) containing structural data.

The portion of wetlands data from the West Eugene Wetlands Plan that falls within the Eugene urban growth boundary. The wetlands data were delineated by private consultants for use by the City of Eugene Planning and Development. The West Eugene Wetlands Plan (WEWP) is a Wetland Conservation Plan Inventory that has been adopted by the the City of Eugene and Lane County. The Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have approved the WEWP. The data field that is most widely used is STATUS, which refers to the officially adopted designation for each polygon. Learn more about the West Eugene Wetlands Plan.Terms of UseThis product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. This layer represents only the wetlands falling within the Eugene urban growth boundary. The layer does not constitute the adopted Goal 5 wetland resources, and users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of this information. To verify information presented in this layer, contact the Planner-on-Duty at 541-682-5377.The maps and data available for access from the City of Eugene are provided "as is" without warranty or any representation of accuracy, timeliness or completeness. The burden for determining accuracy, completeness, timeliness, merchantability and fitness for or the appropriateness for use rests solely on the user accessing this information. The City of Eugene makes no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the use of the maps and data available for access at this website. There are no implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The user acknowledges and accepts all inherent limitations of the maps and data, including the fact that the maps and data are dynamic and in a constant state of maintenance, correction and revision. Any maps and associated data for access do not represent a survey. No liability is assumed for the accuracy of the data delineated on any map, either expressed or implied.

Existing & Proposed bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes on Martha's Vineyard and the Elizabeth Islands (town of Gosnold) are included in this dataset. The linear network was extracted mostly from MassDOT Year-End Road Inventory Files centerlines or on-screen digitized from aerial photos. These data are not intended for engineering purposes.Key Attributes are Type and Phase. TYPE could be: Path, Lane, or Route. PHASE could be:1 = Existing bike path, lane, or routeThe remaining six phases are somewhere in the planning/programming/dreamt phase ...2 = Bike path, lane or route Under Construction3 = Bike path, lane or route Advertised Construction4 = Bike path, lane or route Included in the region's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)5 = Bike path, lane or route proposed in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)6 = Need for bike path, lane, or route recognized but exact route is undecided7 = Need for bike path, lane, or route recognizedTOWN utilizes the ID numbers assigned by MassGIS: 104 = Aquinnah, 62 = Chilmark, 89 = Edgartown, 109 = Gosnold, 221 = Oak Bluffs, 296 = Tisbury, 327 = West TisburySURFACE is a generalized categorization: P = Paved, U = Unpaved, ND = Not DeterminedContributors to this dataset may include: BPAC (Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Town's Open Space & Recreation Committees, MVC Martha's Vineyard Commission, Ad-hoc biking enthusiasts, Town's Master Plan sub-Committees, etc.

Attachment regarding request by George Farrell, Jr. to rezone approximately 17.46 acres at the corner of Farrington Point Rd (SR 1008) and McGhee Rd (SR 1717), Williams Township from RA-40 Residential Agricultural to Conditional Use B-1 Business.

A line feature class of Miami-Dade County, Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) existing bike lanes.Updated: Annually The data was created using: Projected Coordinate System: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_SphereProjection: Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere

Attachment regarding request by Karelian Homes, Inc. for subdivision Final Plat review and approval of The Lane at Cattail Creek, consisting of 19 lots on 58.67 acres, located off Rebecca Lane, S. R. 2524, Hadley Township, parcel #60065.

Attachment regarding a legislative request by Walt Lewis to rezone Parcels 88772 (16.54 ac) and 17696 (4 ac) from R-1 Residential to CD-NB Neighborhood Business for a boat and RV storage facility located at 896 Beaver Creek Rd, New Hope Township.

Printable Arthur Lane Subdivision Map

Project Background The South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization (SJTPO) is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) covering Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties in southern New Jersey. Formed in 1993, SJTPO serves as a technical resource, provides access to funding, and works to provide a regional approach to address transportation planning and engineering issues.On this project Advanced Infrastructure Design, Inc. (AID) collected pavement condition within SJTPO’s constituent counties to make informed programming decisions and advance pavement preservation techniques. This data was collected on approximately 1,491 centerline miles of roadways in the SJTPO region across Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties.Data CollectionAID collected all pavement condition data simultaneously at posted roadway speeds without interruption to traffic using AID’s Integrated Testing Vehicle (ITV). Data collected with this vehicle included: high-resolution video images; continuous IRI, rut depth, faulting, and surface distresses such as cracking, faulting etc. using a Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS); and, continuous Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data that can be used to estimate pavement thickness.All this information was recorded with GPS coordinates (latitude and longitude) having sub-centimeter accuracy to allow for easy integration with the counties’ geodatabases. AID’s ITV is also equipped with an Applanix POS LV 420 unit to enhance its GPS capabilities. This is one of the most reliable and advanced precision locating sensing systems that will enable our data collection to be performed reliably and accurately in the most difficult GNSS/GPS conditions to produce sub-centimeter accuracy.Data collection was performed between 09/15/2018 and 01/08/2019 and the total mileage of the network collected was 1,491 centerline miles, approximately divided among the four constituent counties as follows:373 miles in Atlantic County213 miles in Cape May County542 miles in Cumberland County363 miles in Salem CountyIt should be noted that data was collected within County roads as follows:On two-lane roadways, data was collected in one travel direction with AID’s ITV on each roadway segment.On multi-lane roadways, data was collected within the most heavily used lane (i.e., generally the right lane) in each travel direction. Unpaved/dirt roads were not investigated.

Printable Windwood Lane Subdivision Map

Live connection to CALTRANS KML feed. https://quickmap.dot.ca.gov/data/lcs2way.kml