This is a test collection for passage and document retrieval, produced in the TREC 2023 Deep Learning track. The Deep Learning Track studies information retrieval in a large training data regime. This is the case where the number of training queries with at least one positive label is at least in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands or more. This corresponds to real-world scenarios such as training based on click logs and training based on labels from shallow pools (such as the pooling in the TREC Million Query Track or the evaluation of search engines based on early precision). Certain machine learning based methods, such as methods based on deep learning are known to require very large datasets for training. Lack of such large scale datasets has been a limitation for developing such methods for common information retrieval tasks, such as document ranking. The Deep Learning Track organized in the previous years aimed at providing large scale datasets to TREC, and create a focused research effort with a rigorous blind evaluation of ranker for the passage ranking and document ranking tasks. Similar to the previous years, one of the main goals of the track in 2022 is to study what methods work best when a large amount of training data is available. For example, do the same methods that work on small data also work on large data? How much do methods improve when given more training data? What external data and models can be brought in to bear in this scenario, and how useful is it to combine full supervision with other forms of supervision? The collection contains 12 million web pages, 138 million passages from those web pages, search queries, and relevance judgments for the queries.

Computers are now involved in many economic transactions and can capture data associated with these transactions, which can then be manipulated and analyzed. Conventional statistical and econometric techniques such as regression often work well, but there are issues unique to big datasets that may require different tools. First, the sheer size of the data involved may require more powerful data manipulation tools. Second, we may have more potential predictors than appropriate for estimation, so we need to do some kind of variable selection. Third, large datasets may allow for more flexible relationships than simple linear models. Machine learning techniques such as decision trees, support vector machines, neural nets, deep learning, and so on may allow for more effective ways to model complex relationships. In this essay, I will describe a few of these tools for manipulating and analyzing big data. I believe that these methods have a lot to offer and should be more widely known and used by economists.

One of the primary challenges inherent in utilizing deep learning models is the scarcity and accessibility hurdles associated with acquiring datasets of sufficient size to facilitate effective training of these networks. This is particularly significant in object detection, shape completion, and fracture assembly. Instead of scanning a large number of real-world fragments, it is possible to generate massive datasets with synthetic pieces. However, realistic fragmentation is computationally intensive in the preparation (e.g., pre-factured models) and generation. Otherwise, simpler algorithms such as Voronoi diagrams provide faster processing speeds at the expense of compromising realism. Hence, it is required to balance computational efficiency and realism for generating large datasets for marching learning.

We proposed a GPU-based fragmentation method to improve the baseline Discrete Voronoi Chain aimed at completing this dataset generation task. The dataset in this repository includes voxelized fragments from high-resolution 3D models, curated to be used as training sets for machine learning models. More specifically, these models come from an archaeological dataset, which led to more than 1M fragments from 1,052 Iberian vessels. In this dataset, fragments are not stored individually; instead, the fragmented voxelizations are provided in a compressed binary file (.rle.zip). Once uncompressed, each fragment is represented by a different number in the grid. The class to which each vessel belongs is also included in class.csv. The GPU-based pipeline that generated this dataset is explained at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.104104" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.104104.

Please, note that this dataset originally provided voxel data, point clouds and triangle meshes. However, we opted for including only voxel data because 1) the original dataset is too large to be uploaded to Zenodo and 2) the original intent of our paper is to generate implicit data in the form of voxels. If interested in the whole dataset (450GB), please visit the web page of our research institute.

We present Code4ML: a Large-scale Dataset of annotated Machine Learning Code, a corpus of Python code snippets, competition summaries, and data descriptions from Kaggle.

The data is organized in a table structure. Code4ML includes several main objects: competitions information, raw code blocks collected form Kaggle and manually marked up snippets. Each table has a .csv format.

Each competition has the text description and metadata, reflecting competition and used dataset characteristics as well as evaluation metrics (competitions.csv). The corresponding datasets can be loaded using Kaggle API and data sources.

The code blocks themselves and their metadata are collected to the data frames concerning the publishing year of the initial kernels. The current version of the corpus includes two code blocks files: snippets from kernels up to the 2020 year (сode_blocks_upto_20.csv) and those from the 2021 year (сode_blocks_21.csv) with corresponding metadata. The corpus consists of 2 743 615 ML code blocks collected from 107 524 Jupyter notebooks.

Marked up code blocks have the following metadata: anonymized id, the format of the used data (for example, table or audio), the id of the semantic type, a flag for the code errors, the estimated relevance to the semantic class (from 1 to 5), the id of the parent notebook, and the name of the competition. The current version of the corpus has ~12 000 labeled snippets (markup_data_20220415.csv).

As marked up code blocks data contains the numeric id of the code block semantic type, we also provide a mapping from this number to semantic type and subclass (actual_graph_2022-06-01.csv).

The dataset can help solve various problems, including code synthesis from a prompt in natural language, code autocompletion, and semantic code classification.

One of the key problems that arises in many areas is to estimate a potentially nonlinear function [tex] G(x, \theta)[/tex] given input and output samples tex [/tex] so that [tex]y approx G(x, \theta)[/tex]. There are many approaches to addressing this regression problem. Neural networks, regression trees, and many other methods have been developed to estimate [tex]$G$[/tex] given the input output pair tex [/tex]. One method that I have worked with is called Gaussian process regression. There many good texts and papers on the subject. For more technical information on the method and its applications see: http://www.gaussianprocess.org/ A key problem that arises in developing these models on very large data sets is that it ends up requiring an [tex]O(N^3)[/tex] computation where N is the number of data points and the training sample. Obviously this becomes very problematic when N is large. I discussed this problem with Leslie Foster, a mathematics professor at San Jose State University. He, along with some of his students, developed a method to address this problem based on Cholesky decomposition and pivoting. He also shows that this leads to a numerically stable result. If ou're interested in some light reading, I’d suggest you take a look at his recent paper (which was accepted in the Journal of Machine Learning Research) posted on dashlink. We've also posted code for you to try it out. Let us know how it goes. If you are interested in applications of this method in the area of prognostics, check out our new paper on the subject which was published in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

tables

net traffic

1. Image of the Alexandria database state corresponding to the paper "Improving machine-learning models in materials science through large datasets".

Static pbe calculations for 1D, 2D, 3D compounds can be found in 1D_pbe.tar.gz, 2D_pbe.tar.gz, 3D_pbe.tar.gz in batches of 100k materials. The latter also contains a separate convex hull pickle with all compounds on the pbe convex hull (convex_hull_pbe_2023.12.29.json.bz2) and a list of prototypes in the database (prototypes.json.bz2). The systematic 3D calculations performed for the article Improving machine-learning models in materials science through large datasets (in the paper referred to as round 2 and 3) can be found by the location keyword in the data dictionary of each ComputedStructureEntry containing "cgat_comp/quaternaries" (round 2) and "cgat_comp2/" (round 3). Round 1 (10.1002/adma.202210788) can be found under "cgat_comp/ternaries", ""cgat_comp/binaries".

Static pbesol calculations for 3D compounds can be found in 3D_ps.tar (still zip compressed) in batches of 100k materials. The folder also contains a separate convex hull pickle with all compounds on the pbesol convex hull (convex_hull_ps_2023.12.29.json.bz2).

Static scan calculations for 3D compounds can be found in 3D_scan.tar (still zip compressed) in batches of 100k materials. The folder also contains a separate convex hull pickle with all compounds on the scan convex hull (convex_hull_scan_2023.12.29.json.bz2).

Geometry relaxation curves for 1D and 2D and 3D compounds calculated with PBE can be found in geo_opt_1D.tar.gz, geo_opt_2D.tar.gz. and geo_opt_3D.tar. Each file in each folder contains a batch of up to 10k relaxation trajectories.

PBESOL relaxation trajectories for 3D compounds can be found in geo_opt_ps.tar

1. Crystal graph attention networks to predict the volume (volume_round_3.tar.gz) and distance to the convex hull (e_above_hull_round_3.tar.gz) trained for the paper "Improving machine-learning models in materials science through large datasets".

Can be used with the code at https://github.com/hyllios/CGAT/tree/main/CGAT.Note will predict the distance to the convex hull not normalized per atom when using the code on the github.

1. Alignn models as well as m3gnet and mace models corresponding to the publication can be found in alexandria_v2.tar.gz

2. scripts.tar.gz Some scripts used for generating CGAT input data/ performing parallel predictions and for relaxations with m3gnet/mace force fields

Tabular data is a way to structure, organize and present information conveniently and effectively. Real-world tables present data in two dimensions by arranging cells in matrices that summarize information and facilitate side-by-side comparisons. Recent research efforts aim to train large models with machine learning methods to understand structured tables, a process that enables knowledge transfer in various downstream tasks. Model pre-training, though, requires large tabular datasets, conveniently formatted to reflect cell and table properties and characteristics. This paper presents a financial dataset, called ENTRANT that comprises millions of tables. The tables are transformed to reflect cell attributes, as well as positional and hierarchical information. Hence, they facilitate, among other things, pre-training tasks for table understanding with deep learning methods. The dataset provides table and cell information along with the corresponding metadata in a machine-readable JSON format. Furthermore, we have automated all data processing and curation in a free and open-access project. Moreover, we have technically validated the dataset, through unit testing of high code coverage. Finally, we demonstrate the use of the dataset in a pre-training task of a state-of-the-art model, which is also used for downstream cell classification.

The following dataset has been used for the paper entitled "Design Analytics for Mobile Learning: Scaling up theClassification of Learning Designs based onCognitive and Contextual Elements".

Abstract

This research was triggered by the identified need in literature for large-scale studies about the kind of designs that teachers create for Mobile Learning (m-learning). These studies require analyses of large datasets of learning designs. The common approach followed by researchers when analysing designs has been to manually classify them following high-level pedagogically-guided coding strategies, which demands extensive work. Therefore, the first goal of this paper is to explore the use of Supervised Machine Learning (SML) to automatically classify the textual content of m-learning designs, through pedagogically-relevant classifications, such as the cognitive level demanded by students to carry out specific designed tasks, the phases of inquiry learning represented in the designs, or the role that the situated environment has in them. As not all the SML models are transparent, while often researchers need to understand the behaviour behind them, the second goal of this paper considers the trade-off between models’ performance and interpretability in the context of design analytics for m-learning. To achieve these goals we compiled a dataset of designs deployed through two tools, Avastusrada and Smartzoos. With it, we trained and compared different models and feature extraction techniques. We further optimized andcompared the best-performing and most interpretable algorithms (EstBERT and Logistic Regression) to consider the second goal through an illustrative case. We found that SML can reliably classify designs, with accuracy>0.86and Cohen’s kappa>0.69.

This dataset is an extension of my previous work on creating a dataset for natural language processing tasks. It leverages binary representation to characterise various machine learning models. The attributes in the dataset are derived from a dictionary, which was constructed from a corpus of prompts typically provided to a large language model (LLM). These prompts reference specific machine learning algorithms and their implementations. For instance, consider a user asking an LLM or a generative AI to create a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model for a particular application. By applying this concept to multiple machine learning models, we constructed our corpus. This corpus was then transformed into the current dataset using a bag-of-words approach. In this dataset, each attribute corresponds to a word from our dictionary, represented as a binary value: 1 indicates the presence of the word in a given prompt, and 0 indicates its absence. At the end of each entry, there is a label. Each entry in the dataset pertains to a single class, where each class represents a distinct machine learning model or algorithm. This dataset is intended for multi-class classification tasks, not multi-label classification, as each entry is associated with only one label and does not belong to multiple labels simultaneously. This dataset has been utilised with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using the Keras Automodel API, achieving impressive training and testing accuracy rates exceeding 97%. Post-training, the model's predictive performance was rigorously evaluated in a production environment, where it continued to demonstrate exceptional accuracy. For this evaluation, we employed a series of questions, which are listed below. These questions were intentionally designed to be similar to ensure that the model can effectively distinguish between different machine learning models, even when the prompts are closely related.

KNN How would you create a KNN model to classify emails as spam or not spam based on their content and metadata? How could you implement a KNN model to classify handwritten digits using the MNIST dataset? How would you use a KNN approach to build a recommendation system for suggesting movies to users based on their ratings and preferences? How could you employ a KNN algorithm to predict the price of a house based on features such as its location, size, and number of bedrooms etc? Can you create a KNN model for classifying different species of flowers based on their petal length, petal width, sepal length, and sepal width? How would you utilise a KNN model to predict the sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral) of text reviews or comments? Can you create a KNN model for me that could be used in malware classification? Can you make me a KNN model that can detect a network intrusion when looking at encrypted network traffic? Can you make a KNN model that would predict the stock price of a given stock for the next week? Can you create a KNN model that could be used to detect malware when using a dataset relating to certain permissions a piece of software may have access to?

Decision Tree Can you describe the steps involved in building a decision tree model to classify medical images as malignant or benign for cancer diagnosis and return a model for me? How can you utilise a decision tree approach to develop a model for classifying news articles into different categories (e.g., politics, sports, entertainment) based on their textual content? What approach would you take to create a decision tree model for recommending personalised university courses to students based on their academic strengths and weaknesses? Can you describe how to create a decision tree model for identifying potential fraud in financial transactions based on transaction history, user behaviour, and other relevant data? In what ways might you apply a decision tree model to classify customer complaints into different categories determining the severity of language used? Can you create a decision tree classifier for me? Can you make me a decision tree model that will help me determine the best course of action across a given set of strategies? Can you create a decision tree model for me that can recommend certain cars to customers based on their preferences and budget? How can you make a decision tree model that will predict the movement of star constellations in the sky based on data provided by the NASA website? How do I create a decision tree for time-series forecasting?

Random Forest Can you describe the steps involved in building a random forest model to classify different types of anomalies in network traffic data for cybersecurity purposes and return the code for me? In what ways could you implement a random forest model to predict the severity of traffic congestion in urban areas based on historical traffic patterns, weather...

The global Deep Learning Software market size was valued at USD XXX million in 2025 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period 2025-2033, reaching a value of USD XXX million by 2033. The growth of the market is attributed to the increasing adoption of deep learning for various applications such as image recognition, natural language processing, fraud detection, and healthcare diagnostics. Key industry trends that are driving the market growth include the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), the development of new deep learning algorithms, the availability of large datasets, and the reduction in the cost of computing. The major players in the market are Microsoft, Google, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Nuance Communications, and Clarifai. The market is segmented based on application into large enterprises and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and based on deployment type into on-premise and cloud-based. The North American region holds the largest share of the market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The increasing adoption of deep learning in the healthcare, retail, finance, and manufacturing industries is expected to drive market growth in the coming years.

FileMarket provides premium Large Language Model (LLM) Data designed to support and enhance a wide range of AI applications. Our globally sourced LLM Data sets are meticulously curated to ensure high quality, diversity, and accuracy, making them ideal for training robust and reliable language models. In addition to LLM Data, we also offer comprehensive datasets across Object Detection Data, Machine Learning (ML) Data, Deep Learning (DL) Data, and Biometric Data. Each dataset is carefully crafted to meet the specific needs of cutting-edge AI and machine learning projects.

Key use cases of our Large Language Model (LLM) Data:

Text generation Chatbots and virtual assistants Machine translation Sentiment analysis Speech recognition Content summarization Why choose FileMarket's data:

Object Detection Data: Essential for training AI in image and video analysis. Machine Learning (ML) Data: Ideal for a broad spectrum of applications, from predictive analysis to NLP. Deep Learning (DL) Data: Designed to support complex neural networks and deep learning models. Biometric Data: Specialized for facial recognition, fingerprint analysis, and other biometric applications. FileMarket's premier sources for top-tier Large Language Model (LLM) Data and other specialized datasets ensure your AI projects drive innovation and achieve success across various applications.

BackgroundClinical data is instrumental to medical research, machine learning (ML) model development, and advancing surgical care, but access is often constrained by privacy regulations and missing data. Synthetic data offers a promising solution to preserve privacy while enabling broader data access. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) provide an opportunity to generate synthetic data with reduced reliance on domain expertise, computational resources, and pre-training.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the feasibility of generating realistic tabular clinical data with OpenAI’s GPT-4o using zero-shot prompting, and evaluate the fidelity of LLM-generated data by comparing its statistical properties to the Vital Signs DataBase (VitalDB), a real-world open-source perioperative dataset.MethodsIn Phase 1, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset with qualitative descriptions of 13 clinical parameters. The resultant data was assessed for general errors, plausibility of outputs, and cross-verification of related parameters. In Phase 2, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset using descriptive statistics of the VitalDB dataset. Fidelity was assessed using two-sample t-tests, two-sample proportion tests, and 95% confidence interval (CI) overlap.ResultsIn Phase 1, GPT-4o generated a complete and structured dataset comprising 6,166 case files. The dataset was plausible in range and correctly calculated body mass index for all case files based on respective heights and weights. Statistical comparison between the LLM-generated datasets and VitalDB revealed that Phase 2 data achieved significant fidelity. Phase 2 data demonstrated statistical similarity in 12/13 (92.31%) parameters, whereby no statistically significant differences were observed in 6/6 (100.0%) categorical/binary and 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters. Overlap of 95% CIs were observed in 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters.ConclusionZero-shot prompting with GPT-4o can generate realistic tabular synthetic datasets, which can replicate key statistical properties of real-world perioperative data. This study highlights the potential of LLMs as a novel and accessible modality for synthetic data generation, which may address critical barriers in clinical data access and eliminate the need for technical expertise, extensive computational resources, and pre-training. Further research is warranted to enhance fidelity and investigate the use of LLMs to amplify and augment datasets, preserve multivariate relationships, and train robust ML models.

Extracting and parsing reference strings from research articles is a challenging task. State-of-the-art tools like GROBID apply rather simple machine learning models such as conditional random fields (CRF). Recent research has shown a high potential of deep-learning for reference string parsing. The challenge with deep learning is, however, that the training step requires enormous amounts of labeled data – which does not exist for reference string parsing. Creating such a large dataset manually, through human labor, seems hardly feasible. Therefore, we created GIANT. GIANT is a large dataset with 991,411,100 XML labeled reference strings. The strings were automatically created based on 677,000 entries from CrossRef, 1,500 citation styles in the citation-style language, and the citation processor citeproc-js. GIANT can be used to train machine learning models, particularly deep learning models, for citation parsing. While we have not yet tested GIANT for training such models, we hypothesise that the dataset will be able to significantly improve the accuracy of citation parsing. The dataset and code to create it, are freely available at https://github.com/BeelGroup/.

The mean value and the 90% confidence interval are also reported in the table.

"'https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01721-8'">MedMNIST v2 - A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01721-8

A large-scale MNIST-like collection of standardized biomedical images, including 12 datasets for 2D and 6 datasets for 3D. All images are pre-processed into 28x28 (2D) or 28x28x28 (3D) with the corresponding classification labels, so that no background knowledge is required for users. Covering primary data modalities in biomedical images, MedMNIST is designed to perform classification on lightweight 2D and 3D images with various data scales (from 100 to 100,000) and diverse tasks (binary/multi-class, ordinal regression and multi-label). The resulting dataset, consisting of approximately 708K 2D images and 10K 3D images in total, could support numerous research and educational purposes in biomedical image analysis, computer vision and machine learning.Providers benchmark several baseline methods on MedMNIST, including 2D / 3D neural networks and open-source / commercial AutoML tools.

MedMNIST Landscape :

https://storage.googleapis.com/kagglesdsdata/datasets/4390240/7539891/medmnistlandscape.png?X-Goog-Algorithm=GOOG4-RSA-SHA256&X-Goog-Credential=databundle-worker-v2%40kaggle-161607.iam.gserviceaccount.com%2F20240202%2Fauto%2Fstorage%2Fgoog4_request&X-Goog-Date=20240202T132716Z&X-Goog-Expires=345600&X-Goog-SignedHeaders=host&X-Goog-Signature=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" alt="medmnistlandscape">

About MedMNIST Landscape figure: The horizontal axis denotes the base-10 logarithm of the dataset scale, and the vertical axis denotes base-10 logarithm of imaging resolution. The upward and downward triangles are used to distinguish between 2D datasets and 3D datasets, and the 4 different colors represent different tasks

Key Features

###

Diverse: It covers diverse data modalities, dataset scales (from 100 to 100,000), and tasks (binary/multi-class, multi-label, and ordinal regression). It is as diverse as the VDD and MSD to fairly evaluate the generalizable performance of machine learning algorithms in different settings, but both 2D and 3D biomedical images are provided.

Standardized: Each sub-dataset is pre-processed into the same format, which requires no background knowledge for users. As an MNIST-like dataset collection to perform classification tasks on small images, it primarily focuses on the machine learning part rather than the end-to-end system. Furthermore, we provide standard train-validation-test splits for all datasets in MedMNIST, therefore algorithms could be easily compared.

User-Friendly: The small size of 28×28 (2D) or 28×28×28 (3D) is lightweight and ideal for evaluating machine learning algorithms. We also offer a larger-size version, MedMNIST+: 64x64 (2D), 128x128 (2D), 224x224 (2D), and 64x64x64 (3D). Serving as a complement to the 28-size MedMNIST, this could be a standardized resource for developing medical foundation models. All these datasets are accessible via the same API.

Educational: As an interdisciplinary research area, biomedical image analysis is difficult to hand on for researchers from other communities, as it requires background knowledge from computer vision, machine learning, biomedical imaging, and clinical science. Our data with the Creative Commons (CC) License is easy to use for educational purposes.

Refer to the paper to learn more about data : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01721-8

Starter Code: download more data and training

Github Page: https://github.com/MedMNIST/MedMNIST

My Kaggle Starter Notebook: https://www.kaggle.com/code/arashnic/medmnist-download-and-use-data?scriptVersionId=161421937

Acknowledgements

Jiancheng Yang,Rui Shi,Donglai Wei,Zequan Liu,Lin Zhao,Bilian Ke,Hanspeter Pfister,Bingbing Ni Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, Fudan Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

License and Citation

The code is under Apache-2.0 License.

The MedMNIST dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)...

This repository contains the Papyrus dataset, an aggregated dataset of small molecule bioactivities, as described in the manuscript "Papyrus - A large scale curated dataset aimed at bioactivity predictions" (Work in Progress).

With the recent rapid growth of publicly available ligand-protein bioactivity data, there is a trove of viable data that can be used to train machine learning algorithms. However, not all data is equal in terms of size and quality, and a significant portion of researcher’s time is needed to adapt the data to their needs. On top of that, finding the right data for a research question can often be a challenge on its own. As an answer to that, we have constructed the Papyrus dataset, comprised of around 60 million datapoints. This dataset contains multiple large publicly available datasets such as ChEMBL and ExCAPE-DB combined with smaller datasets containing high quality data. This aggregated data has been standardised and normalised in a manner that is suitable for machine learning. We show how data can be filtered in a variety of ways, and also perform some rudimentary quantitative structure-activity relationship and proteochemometrics modeling. Our ambition is to create a benchmark set that can be used for constructing predictive models, while also providing a solid baseline for related research.

AI Training Dataset Market Outlook

The global AI training dataset market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.5% from 2024 to 2032. This substantial growth is driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence across various industries, the necessity for large-scale and high-quality datasets to train AI models, and the ongoing advancements in AI and machine learning technologies.

One of the primary growth factors in the AI training dataset market is the exponential increase in data generation across multiple sectors. With the proliferation of internet usage, the expansion of IoT devices, and the digitalization of industries, there is an unprecedented volume of data being generated daily. This data is invaluable for training AI models, enabling them to learn and make more accurate predictions and decisions. Moreover, the need for diverse and comprehensive datasets to improve AI accuracy and reliability is further propelling market growth.

Another significant factor driving the market is the rising investment in AI and machine learning by both public and private sectors. Governments around the world are recognizing the potential of AI to transform economies and improve public services, leading to increased funding for AI research and development. Simultaneously, private enterprises are investing heavily in AI technologies to gain a competitive edge, enhance operational efficiency, and innovate new products and services. These investments necessitate high-quality training datasets, thereby boosting the market.

The proliferation of AI applications in various industries, such as healthcare, automotive, retail, and finance, is also a major contributor to the growth of the AI training dataset market. In healthcare, AI is being used for predictive analytics, personalized medicine, and diagnostic automation, all of which require extensive datasets for training. The automotive industry leverages AI for autonomous driving and vehicle safety systems, while the retail sector uses AI for personalized shopping experiences and inventory management. In finance, AI assists in fraud detection and risk management. The diverse applications across these sectors underline the critical need for robust AI training datasets.

As the demand for AI applications continues to grow, the role of Ai Data Resource Service becomes increasingly vital. These services provide the necessary infrastructure and tools to manage, curate, and distribute datasets efficiently. By leveraging Ai Data Resource Service, organizations can ensure that their AI models are trained on high-quality and relevant data, which is crucial for achieving accurate and reliable outcomes. The service acts as a bridge between raw data and AI applications, streamlining the process of data acquisition, annotation, and validation. This not only enhances the performance of AI systems but also accelerates the development cycle, enabling faster deployment of AI-driven solutions across various sectors.

Regionally, North America currently dominates the AI training dataset market due to the presence of major technology companies and extensive R&D activities in the region. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid technological advancements, increasing investments in AI, and the growing adoption of AI technologies across various industries in countries like China, India, and Japan. Europe and Latin America are also anticipated to experience significant growth, supported by favorable government policies and the increasing use of AI in various sectors.

Data Type Analysis

The data type segment of the AI training dataset market encompasses text, image, audio, video, and others. Each data type plays a crucial role in training different types of AI models, and the demand for specific data types varies based on the application. Text data is extensively used in natural language processing (NLP) applications such as chatbots, sentiment analysis, and language translation. As the use of NLP is becoming more widespread, the demand for high-quality text datasets is continually rising. Companies are investing in curated text datasets that encompass diverse languages and dialects to improve the accuracy and efficiency of NLP models.

Image data is critical for computer vision application

During the study period