Kyiv is the largest city of Ukraine, with approximately 2.95 million inhabitants as of January 1, 2022. Kharkiv had the second-largest population of around 1.42 million, followed by Odesa and Dnipro. Economic situation in Ukraine Ukraine has a population of around 42 million inhabitants - close to 70 percent of which live in urban areas, with almost three million living in Ukraine’s largest city and capital, Kyiv. The city is located in the north central part of the country on the Dnieper River and is one of the largest in Europe. The country’s second-largest city, Kharkiv, is about half of Kyiv's size and located in the northeast. Kharkiv was the first city to be occupied by the Soviet Union in 1917 until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Since the collapse, Ukraine has been largely divided between east and west. Many inhabitants speak Ukrainian to the west, whereas Russian is dominant in parts of the east and south. Like Kharkiv, many of Ukraine’s other biggest cities which have fewer than one million inhabitants are located to the east of the country – a region which has uprooted and displaced many of its inhabitants because of the military actions that started in 2014. In 2015, Ukrainians across the country were affected by a huge spike in inflation, which reached near 49 percent. In the following years, it marked a decrease, measuring below three percent in 2020. The country’s GDP has also been significantly impacted by the crisis, which has left approximately 1.5 million Ukrainians internally displaced since 2014, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The unemployment rate was above nine percent in 2020.

Population in largest city in Ukraine was reported at 3020228 in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Ukraine - Population in largest city - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on October of 2025.

Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City: as % of Urban Population data was reported at 9.499 % in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 9.425 % for 2016. Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City: as % of Urban Population data is updated yearly, averaging 7.403 % from Dec 1960 (Median) to 2017, with 58 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.499 % in 2017 and a record low of 5.826 % in 1960. Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City: as % of Urban Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Ukraine – Table UA.World Bank: Population and Urbanization Statistics. Population in largest city is the percentage of a country's urban population living in that country's largest metropolitan area.; ; United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects.; Weighted Average;

Population in the largest city (% of urban population) in Ukraine was reported at 11.35 % in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Ukraine - Population in the largest city - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on September of 2025.

Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City data was reported at 2,986,974.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,965,625.000 Person for 2016. Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City data is updated yearly, averaging 2,557,524.500 Person from Dec 1960 (Median) to 2017, with 58 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,986,974.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 1,163,046.000 Person in 1960. Ukraine UA: Population in Largest City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Ukraine – Table UA.World Bank: Population and Urbanization Statistics. Population in largest city is the urban population living in the country's largest metropolitan area.; ; United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects.; ;

In January 2022, the highest number of offices of product-oriented IT companies in Ukraine was registered in the capital, at over 1.2 thousand. The number of product developer offices in Lviv, the largest city in Western Ukraine, was significantly lower and amounted to 128.

The most significant number of Ukrainians in Poland was reported in April 2022. Of this figure, *** million stayed in the ** largest cities.

As of September 2020, the capital of Ukraine Kyiv, offered by far the most public transport routes - a total of *** bus routes and ***** metro lines were available for its locals. The second biggest locality in the country, Kharkiv had the same number of metro routes as the capital. The number of bus routes, however, was twice smaller than in Kyiv.

The contemporary globalized world characterizes the rapid population growth, its significant concentration in cities, and an increase in the urban population. Currently, many socio-cultural, economic, environmental, and other challenges are arising in modern cities, negatively affecting the state of the urban environment, health, and quality of life. There is a need to study these problems in order to solve them. Urban Green Areas (UGAs) are a part of the social space and a vital part of the urban landscape. They act as an environmental framework of the territory and a factor ensuring a more comfortable environment of human life. This study aims at substantiating the importance of the UGAs, identifying the spatiotemporal dynamics of their functioning, and transforming changes in their infrastructure given the expansion of their functions. This research was carried out as a case study of the second city in Ukraine, Kharkiv. The authors developed and used an original integrated approach using urban remote sensing (URS) and GIS for changes detection to evaluate the current state and monitor spatial transformations of the UGAs. We used several GIS platforms and online resources to overcome the lack of digital cadastre of the thematic municipal area of Kharkiv. This resulted in the present original study. The study analyses the dynamics of the spatial and functional organization of the UGAs according to the Master Plans, plans, maps, and functional zoning of the city for the period from 1867 to 2019. The peripheral green areas became important after the large-scale development of the extensive residential areas during the rapid industrial development in remote districts of the city. They provide opportunities for population recreation near living places. Central UGAs are modern, comprehensively developed clusters with multidisciplinary infrastructure, while the peripheral UGAs are currently being developed. The use of URS/GIS tools in the analysis of the satellite images covering 2000–2020 allowed identifying the factors of the UGAs losses in Kharkiv and finding that UGAs were not expanding and partially shrinking during the study period. It is caused by the intensive construction of the residential neighborhoods, primarily peripheral areas, infrastructure development, and expansion of the city transport network. Nonetheless, some sustainable trends of UGA functioning without more or less significant decrease could be proved as existing in a long-term perspective. The authors analyzed and evaluated changes and expansion of the UGAs functions according to modern social demand. The research value of this is the usage of different approaches, scientific sources, URS/GIS tools to determine the UGAs transformation in the second-largest city in Ukraine (Kharkiv), to expand and update the main functions of UGAs and their role in the population’s recreation. The obtained scientific results can be used to update the following strategies, programs, and development plans of Kharkiv.

Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. It is the second-largest country by area in Europe after Russia, which it borders to the east and north-east. Ukraine also shares borders with Belarus to the north; Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary to the west; Romania and Moldova to the south; and has a coastline along the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea. It spans an area of 603,628 km2 (233,062 sq mi) and the nation's capital and largest city is Kyiv.

Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 1 cities in the Major County, OK by Ukrainian population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each city over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Ukrainian Population: This column displays the rank of city in the Major County, OK by their Ukrainian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• City: The City for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Ukrainian Population: The Ukrainian population of the city is shown in this column.
• % of Total City Population: This shows what percentage of the total city population identifies as Ukrainian. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Major County Ukrainian Population: This tells us how much of the entire Major County, OK Ukrainian population lives in that city. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: This column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Ukraine: Population size, in millions: The latest value from 2024 is 37.86 million, an increase from 37.73 million in 2023. In comparison, the world average is 41.28 million, based on data from 196 countries. Historically, the average for Ukraine from 1960 to 2024 is 47.76 million. The minimum value, 37.73 million, was reached in 2023 while the maximum of 52.35 million was recorded in 1993.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 2 cities in the Big Stone County, MN by Ukrainian population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each city over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Ukrainian Population: This column displays the rank of city in the Big Stone County, MN by their Ukrainian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• City: The City for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Ukrainian Population: The Ukrainian population of the city is shown in this column.
• % of Total City Population: This shows what percentage of the total city population identifies as Ukrainian. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Big Stone County Ukrainian Population: This tells us how much of the entire Big Stone County, MN Ukrainian population lives in that city. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: This column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 5 cities in the Big Horn County, WY by Ukrainian population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each city over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Ukrainian Population: This column displays the rank of city in the Big Horn County, WY by their Ukrainian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• City: The City for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Ukrainian Population: The Ukrainian population of the city is shown in this column.
• % of Total City Population: This shows what percentage of the total city population identifies as Ukrainian. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Big Horn County Ukrainian Population: This tells us how much of the entire Big Horn County, WY Ukrainian population lives in that city. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: This column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

There were 20 107 400 Facebook users in Ukraine in April 2025, which accounted for 46.4% of its entire population. The majority of them were women - 59.2%. People aged 25 to 34 were the largest user group (4 500 000). The highest difference between men and women occurs within people aged 65 and above, where women lead by 638 400.

This data collection offers a large-scale survey of internally displaced persons in six major Ukrainian cities (Kyiv, Dnipro, Odesa, Lviv, Uzhhorod and Ternopil) conducted from 19 February to 01 March 2023. In total, 1,202 internally displaced persons (IDPs) were interviewed (200 in each city).

The sample of the IDP survey is random, with maximum coverage of adult respondents in different places of residence - residential sector, places of centralised settlement (government agencies, dormitories, schools, kindergartens, offices), IDP support centres, etc. The random error does not exceed 3%.

The survey questions focus on life in the new place of residence including material well-being and support received.

This data collection contains the original survey data. The SPSS file (.sav) is the original file provided by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. It has been exported into an Excel file. The content of the respective xlsx-file should be identical with the original sav-file. The sav-file contains the questions and answer options of the original questionnaire in Ukrainian. The original questionnaire together with an English translation is included in the documentation of data collection.

Additionally, an overview of the answers to all questions (original Ukrainian version plus English translation) is provided in table form in the file "results-with-translation.pdf" and an analysis based on the survey is available as “DIF2023-report.pdf”

New in this version: English translation of the questionnaire and of the overview of results.

Revenue is forecast to contract at a compound annual rate of 4.7% over the five years through 2024. COVID-19 caused significant disruption to the construction sector, the industry’s largest market, resulting in weaker demand for aggregates and materials used in the production of construction inputs. Although activity has since risen in line with the easing of lockdown restrictions, poor economic conditions have stifled any significant recovery, continuing to weigh on the industry’s revenue performance. In 2024, revenue is expected to tumble by 3.5% to €43.7 billion. Pandemic-induced supply chain disruptions were worsened by disruption caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, contributing to significant inflationary pressures. In response to rampant inflation, central banks have made retaliatory hikes to the base rate of interest, though this has increased the cost of borrowing for consumers and businesses, hurting activity in the housebuilding and commercial construction markets. This has weighed on demand for quarried materials and reduced revenue prospects for quarry operators. Over the five through 2029, revenue is forecast to grow at a compound annual rate of 2.6%, to €49.6 billion. Economic conditions are likely to remain fairly weak in the short to medium term as inflation remains above the universal 2% target. The elevated rate of inflation will ensure central banks delay any reductions in the base rate, keeping the cost of borrowing high for would-be home buyers. Weaker demand for houses will contribute to weak price performance and disincentivise developers from increasing production, weighing on activity levels in the construction sector.

The Ukraine Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) is a nationally representative survey of 6,841 women age 15-49 and 3,178 men age 15-49. Survey fieldwork was conducted during the period July through November 2007. The UDHS was conducted by the Ukrainian Center for Social Reforms in close collaboration with the State Statistical Committee of Ukraine. The MEASURE DHS Project provided technical support for the survey. The U.S. Agency for International Development/Kyiv Regional Mission to Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus provided funding. The survey is a nationally representative sample survey designed to provide information on population and health issues in Ukraine. The primary goal of the survey was to develop a single integrated set of demographic and health data for the population of the Ukraine. The UDHS was conducted from July to November 2007 by the Ukrainian Center for Social Reforms (UCSR) in close collaboration with the State Statistical Committee (SSC) of Ukraine, which provided organizational and methodological support. Macro International Inc. provided technical assistance for the survey through the MEASURE DHS project. USAID/Kyiv Regional Mission to Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus provided funding for the survey through the MEASURE DHS project. MEASURE DHS is sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to assist countries worldwide in obtaining information on key population and health indicators. The 2007 UDHS collected national- and regional-level data on fertility and contraceptive use, maternal health, adult health and life style, infant and child mortality, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. The survey obtained detailed information on these issues from women of reproductive age and, on certain topics, from men as well. The results of the 2007 UDHS are intended to provide the information needed to evaluate existing social programs and to design new strategies for improving the health of Ukrainians and health services for the people of Ukraine. The 2007 UDHS also contributes to the growing international database on demographic and health-related variables. MAIN RESULTS Fertility rates. A useful index of the level of fertility is the total fertility rate (TFR), which indicates the number of children a woman would have if she passed through the childbearing ages at the current age-specific fertility rates (ASFR). The TFR, estimated for the three-year period preceding the survey, is 1.2 children per woman. This is below replacement level. Contraception : Knowledge and ever use. Knowledge of contraception is widespread in Ukraine. Among married women, knowledge of at least one method is universal (99 percent). On average, married women reported knowledge of seven methods of contraception. Eighty-nine percent of married women have used a method of contraception at some time. Abortion rates. The use of abortion can be measured by the total abortion rate (TAR), which indicates the number of abortions a woman would have in her lifetime if she passed through her childbearing years at the current age-specific abortion rates. The UDHS estimate of the TAR indicates that a woman in Ukraine will have an average of 0.4 abortions during her lifetime. This rate is considerably lower than the comparable rate in the 1999 Ukraine Reproductive Health Survey (URHS) of 1.6. Despite this decline, among pregnancies ending in the three years preceding the survey, one in four pregnancies (25 percent) ended in an induced abortion. Antenatal care. Ukraine has a well-developed health system with an extensive infrastructure of facilities that provide maternal care services. Overall, the levels of antenatal care and delivery assistance are high. Virtually all mothers receive antenatal care from professional health providers (doctors, nurses, and midwives) with negligible differences between urban and rural areas. Seventy-five percent of pregnant women have six or more antenatal care visits; 27 percent have 15 or more ANC visits. The percentage is slightly higher in rural areas than in urban areas (78 percent compared with 73 percent). However, a smaller proportion of rural women than urban women have 15 or more antenatal care visits (23 percent and 29 percent, respectively). HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections : The currently low level of HIV infection in Ukraine provides a unique window of opportunity for early targeted interventions to prevent further spread of the disease. However, the increases in the cumulative incidence of HIV infection suggest that this window of opportunity is rapidly closing. Adult Health : The major causes of death in Ukraine are similar to those in industrialized countries (cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and accidents), but there is also a rising incidence of certain infectious diseases, such as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Women's status : Sixty-four percent of married women make decisions on their own about their own health care, 33 percent decide jointly with their husband/partner, and 1 percent say that their husband or someone else is the primary decisionmaker about the woman's own health care. Domestic Violence : Overall, 17 percent of women age 15-49 experienced some type of physical violence between age 15 and the time of the survey. Nine percent of all women experienced at least one episode of violence in the 12 months preceding the survey. One percent of the women said they had often been subjected to violent physical acts during the past year. Overall, the data indicate that husbands are the main perpetrators of physical violence against women. Human Trafficking : The UDHS collected information on respondents' awareness of human trafficking in Ukraine and, if applicable, knowledge about any household members who had been the victim of human trafficking during the three years preceding the survey. More than half (52 percent) of respondents to the household questionnaire reported that they had heard of a person experiencing this problem and 10 percent reported that they knew personally someone who had experienced human trafficking.

UA：最大城市人口：占城镇人口百分比在12-01-2017达9.499%，相较于12-01-2016的9.425%有所增长。UA：最大城市人口：占城镇人口百分比数据按年更新，12-01-1960至12-01-2017期间平均值为7.403%，共58份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2017，达9.499%，而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1960，为5.826%。CEIC提供的UA：最大城市人口：占城镇人口百分比数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于World Bank，数据归类于Global Database的乌克兰 – 表 UA.世界银行：人口和城市化进程统计。

Abstract

The URHS was performed in conjunction with the Ukraine Women=s Reproductive Health Initiative (UWRHI), a project sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This project consisted of a variety of components, designed to help to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality and improve reproductive health generally in Ukraine. The stated goals of this initiative were to improve the quality of reproductive health services, as well as access to those services, to increase the rate of modern contraceptive use, and to reduce abortion rates in service sites. It was anticipated that improved access to and quality of reproductive health services for women, expanded and improved use of effective contraception, and reduced reliance on abortion as a means of birth prevention would result in reductions in maternal morbidity and mortality.

There were two major reasons for carrying out the 1999 URHS. First, it was intended to fill a substantial need for data regarding the current status of reproductive health of Ukrainian women. Besides providing data on the current situation overall, it also adds to what is known about reproductive health trends and differentials within the population and allows more accurate determinations to be made about the needs of the population. Secondly, the URHS was designed to provide programmatically useful results. The data collected on reproductive health can be used to help direct, modify, or develop interventions, as well as to provide information to policy makers and health care program officials and providers.

Geographic coverage

The survey was designed to obtain interviews with a nationally representative sample of about 7,000 women.

Universe

The 1999 Ukraine Reproductive Health Survey was designed to collect information from a representative sample of all women between the ages of 15 and 44 living in households throughout Ukraine. Although some pregnancy, childbearing, and abortion occurs outside of ages 15 to 44, the relative rarity of these events at those ages in Ukraine suggested that it would be most efficient to limit the sample to women in this age range.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The survey was designed to obtain interviews with a nationally representative sample of about 7,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44 years of age living throughout Ukraine. The survey was intended to be large enough to provide stable estimates regarding the main topics of interest at the regional level (there are five regions: the North, East, Central, South, and West) and for the urban and rural sectors of Ukraine. The sample was geographically self-weighting, with the exception of substantial over-sampling of two sites--the oblasts of Donetsk and Odessa.

The two oversampled oblasts were the sites for USAID-funded reproductive health activities. Donetsk was a site of activities sponsored by the Women’s Reproductive Health Initiative that started in 1996. Odessa was the focus of USAID-sponsored activities implemented by The Policy Project (coordinated by The Futures Group International) that are designed to improve support for family planning activities. Oversampling of these areas was designed to allow local estimates to be made in regard to many of the topics addressed in the URHS.

Three-stage cluster sampling was used to select survey respondents. Potential respondents consisted of all women between the ages of 15 and 44 years who lived in households anywhere in Ukraine. The first stage of sampling consisted of the selection of primary sampling units (PSU). Approximately 550 primary sampling units were selected across Ukraine. The sample was selected proportional to population size (PPS) of each of the country’s 26 oblasts and autonomous regions (with the exception of Odessa and Donetsk). Within each oblast the sample was split proportionally into five size-of-place categories, ranging from large cities to rural areas, using software that listed the estimated population of all locations. Population estimates were based on yearly updates made to census counts. Unfortunately, the most recent census in Ukraine took place when it was still part of the Soviet Union, in 1989. Within each size of place/oblast category, PSU (census enumeration districts) were selected with probability proportionate to size. Within rural areas, post offices were selected instead of places, under the assumption that all post offices cover roughly the same population. This process guarantees a selection of households approximately proportional to the entire population according to oblast and size of place.

The second stage of sampling consisted of the selection of dwelling units and respondents from the selected PSU. Within each selected PSU a random starting point was chosen, followed by selection of contiguous dwelling units, selected in a predetermined order. The number of dwellings visited per PSU varied from 23 to 30, depending on the size of place, since the average number of women of childbearing age per household varies according to size of place. Selection of women for interview was accomplished in the third stage by listing women in each visited household by descending age and selecting every second woman listed regardless of the household in which she was found. However, this procedure was slightly modified to ensure that no more than one woman per household was interviewed

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The 1999 URHS consisted of two questionnaires: a short household instrument and a much longer individual questionnaire. The household questionnaire was two pages long and was administered to any adult living in visited households. It consisted primarily of information regarding the individuals who lived in the household and the location of the residence.

The individual form was completed by selected women 15 to 44 years of age who agreed to be interviewed. This questionnaire covered a wide range of topics related to reproductive health status and needs in Ukraine.

The sections of the questionnaire were: I. Social and demographic characteristics of respondents II. Fertility, pregnancy, and abortion– includes a complete pregnancy history, detailed information on abortions and live births in the preceding five years, use of maternal child health services, and infertility problems and treatment. III. Contraception– includes knowledge and use of specific methods, a month-by-month calendar of contraceptive use in the preceding five years, contraceptive counseling, and detailed information on many aspects of family planning. IV. Information, education, and communication (IEC) and attitudes and beliefs concerning family planning V. Women’s health– includes information on sexual behavior and sexually transmitted infection knowledge and history VI. Socioeconomic characteristics of respondents VII. Intimate partner violence.

Response rate

At least one 15-44 year-old woman was identified as living in 55% of sampled households. In most of the remaining households, there were no resident females eligible for interview. Residents refused to provide interviewers with information concerning the household or its residents in fewer than 1% of the households visited. The difference between urban and rural areas was small, with urban households slightly less likely than rural ones to contain women eligible for interview.

Of those 15-44 year-old women who were identified as living in visited households and selected as potential respondents, 85% were interviewed. The figure was somewhat higher in rural areas (89%) than in urban areas (84%). Eight percent of women selected for interview were never found at home and 6% refused to be interviewed. Individual refusal rates were about twice as high in urban areas as in rural areas.