Release Date: 2020-05-19.The Census Bureau has reviewed this data product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and has approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied (Approval ID: CBDRB-FY20-008)...Release Schedule:.Data in this file come from estimates of business ownership by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status from the 2018 Annual Business Survey (ABS) collection. Data are also obtained from administrative records, the 2017 Economic Census and other economic surveys...Note: The collection year is the year in which the data are collected. A reference year is the year that is referenced in the questions on the survey and in which the statistics are tabulated. For example, the 2018 ABS collection year produces statistics for the 2017 reference year. The "Year" column in the table is the reference year. The ABS has a larger sample size during the benchmark year of 2017. Due to the larger size, more detailed data are shown for reference year 2017...For more information about ABS planned data product releases, see Tentative ABS Schedule...Key Table Information:.Includes U.S. firms with paid employees, operating during the reference year with receipts of $1,000 or more, which are classified in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), Sectors 11 through 99, except for NAICS 111, 112, 482, 491, 521, 525, 813, 814, and 92 which are not covered. Employer firms with more than one domestic establishment are counted in each geographic area and industry in which they operate, but only once in the U.S. and state totals for all sectors. Employment reflects the number of paid employees during the pay period in the reference year that included March 12...Data Items and Other Identifying Records:.Data include estimates on:.Number of employer firms (firms with paid employees). Sales and receipts of employer firms (reported in $1,000s of dollars). Number of employees (during the March 12 pay period). Annual payroll (reported in $1,000s of dollars)...These data are aggregated by the following demographic classifications of firm for:.All firms. Classifiable (firms classifiable by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status). . Sex. Female. Male. Equally male/female. . Ethnicity. Hispanic. Equally Hispanic/non-Hispanic. Non-Hispanic. . Race. White. Black or African American. American Indian and Alaska Native. Asian. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. Minority (Firms classified as any race and ethnicity combination other than non-Hispanic and White). Equally minority/nonminority. Nonminority (Firms classified as non-Hispanic and White). . Veteran Status (defined as having served in any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces). Veteran. Equally veteran/nonveteran. Nonveteran. . . . Unclassifiable (firms not classifiable by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status). ...Moreover, the 2017 reference year statistics include detailed race and ethnicity data tabulated for:.Hispanic subgroups. Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano. Puerto Rican. Cuban. Other Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish. . Asian subgroups. Asian Indian. Chinese. Filipino. Japanese. Korean. Vietnamese. Other Asian. . Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander subgroups. Native Hawaiian. Guamanian or Chamorro. Samoan. Other Pacific Islander. ...Data Notes:.. Business ownership is defined as having 51 percent or more of the stock or equity in the business. Data are provided for businesses owned equally (50% / 50%) by men and women, by Hispanics and non-Hispanics, by minorities and nonminorities, and by veterans and nonveterans. Firms not classifiable by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status are counted and tabulated separately.. The detail may not add to the total or subgroup total because a Hispanic or Latino firm may be of any race, and because a firm could be tabulated in more than one racial group. For example, if a firm responded as both Chinese and Black majority owned, the firm would be included in the detailed Asian and Black estimates but would only be counted once toward the higher level all firms' estimates.. References such as "Mexican-owned," "Puerto Rican-owned," "Cuban-owned" or "other Hispanic- or Latino-owned" businesses refer only to businesses operating in the 50 states and the District of Columbia that self-identified 51 percent or more of their ownership in 2017 to be by individuals of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban or other Hispanic or Latino origin. The ABS does not distinguish between U.S. residents and nonresidents. Companies owned by foreign governments or owned by other companies, foreign or domestic, are included in the category "Unclassifiable."...Industry and Geogr...

Overall and subgroups prevalence of hypertension in the general population of the altitude.

Partner organisations related to each subgroup population.

Background: Recent studies have described a low occurrence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in Latin America. Significant differences in ALS risk have been reported among ethnic populations in the region. We conducted a meta-analysis using population-based data to describe ALS mortality rates in Latin America. We explored sources of heterogeneity among key covariates. Methods: National mortality registries from Latin American countries were searched to identify ALS deaths according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9: code 335.2 and ICD-10: code G12.2). Crude and standardized mortality rates were calculated. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled mortality rates. Subgroup analysis was performed as a means of investigating heterogeneity. Results: Overall, 28,548 ALS deaths and 819 million person-years of follow-up (PYFU) from ten Latin American countries were considered. Standardized mortality varied among countries. The highest mortality rates were observed in Uruguay and Costa Rica at 1.3 and 1.2 per 100,000 PYFU, respectively. The pooled crude mortality rate was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.28–0.53) and the pooled standardized mortality was 0.62 (95%CI: 0.49–0.77) per 100,000 PYFU. Heterogeneity was high (I2: 99.9%, Cochran’s Q p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a higher mortality rate among countries with a higher proportion of Caucasian populations and higher income levels. Conclusion: There is a lower ALS occurrence in Latin America compared to Europe and North America. This meta-analysis supports the hypothesis of a higher ALS risk among the Caucasian population. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of ancestral origins in ALS, taking socioeconomic status into consideration.