Company information such as employee credentials is one of the most common assets online vendors trade illegally on the darknet. According to the source, Zalando.com has suffered thousands of data leakage incidents on the deep web in the 12 months leading up to ********, in which more than ***** employee credentials were compromised. Amazon registered a relatively low number of deep web data leaks, with roughly *** in the last 12 months.

List of Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank sites in Texas with associated PST Registration ID number(s), location information, the date each site was reported to the TCEQ, and the closure date (if closed).

As of the third quarter of 2024, the number of victims of ransomware leak sites worldwide increased by over two percent from the previous quarter, reaching a total of 1,275 victims. Ransomware attacks exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems to encrypt sensitive data, often demanding payment for its release.

As of the fourth quarter of 2023, the number of ransomware leak sites worldwide increased by 29.4 percent from the first quarter of 2021, reaching a total of 47 sites. In the examined period, the number of victims of ransomware leak sites reached a total of total of 1,185 victims.

A current status of NFA means "no further action" and that it is cleaned up as much as the law requires.

By far the largest portion of information leaks in Russia in 2023 was committed through the web, such as from a cloud storage or browser data, at over ** percent of the total breaches. Instant messages, such as in the form of text, voice, or video, were the second most common source of data leakage with a share of around ***** percent.

Explore the historical Whois records related to leaking.site (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.

Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites where petroleum contamination has been found. There may be more than one LUST site per UST site.

Tracks underground storage tanks (UST) site location, site owners, tanks, Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA), site classification and remediation; and the current status of UST & Leaking UST sites.

In 2024, the number of data compromises in the United States stood at 3,158 cases. Meanwhile, over 1.35 billion individuals were affected in the same year by data compromises, including data breaches, leakage, and exposure. While these are three different events, they have one thing in common. As a result of all three incidents, the sensitive data is accessed by an unauthorized threat actor. Industries most vulnerable to data breaches Some industry sectors usually see more significant cases of private data violations than others. This is determined by the type and volume of the personal information organizations of these sectors store. In 2024 the financial services, healthcare, and professional services were the three industry sectors that recorded most data breaches. Overall, the number of healthcare data breaches in some industry sectors in the United States has gradually increased within the past few years. However, some sectors saw decrease. Largest data exposures worldwide In 2020, an adult streaming website, CAM4, experienced a leakage of nearly 11 billion records. This, by far, is the most extensive reported data leakage. This case, though, is unique because cyber security researchers found the vulnerability before the cyber criminals. The second-largest data breach is the Yahoo data breach, dating back to 2013. The company first reported about one billion exposed records, then later, in 2017, came up with an updated number of leaked records, which was three billion. In March 2018, the third biggest data breach happened, involving India’s national identification database Aadhaar. As a result of this incident, over 1.1 billion records were exposed.

As of December 2024, the most significant data breach incident in the United States was the Yahoo data breach that dates back to 2013-2016. Impacting over three billion online users, this incident still remains one of the most significant data breaches worldwide. The second-biggest case was the January 2021 data breach at Microsoft, involving about 30 thousand companies in the United States and around 60 thousand companies around the world.

In 2022, nearly ** percent of Poles stated a person should change the password of a leaked website. Meanwhile, ** percent of Poles indicated that it should be reported to the police.

List of Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank sites in Texas with associated PST Registration ID number(s), location information, the date each site was reported to the TCEQ, and the closure date (if closed).

These points are Leaking Underground Storage Tanks where leaks have been identified as impacting groundwater, they have been located via GPS and are up to date as of October 5, 2009.

Active leaking underground storage tank (LUSTs) sites which the City of Tucson - Environmental Services is currently remediating under the oversight of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality LUST program. Does not include UST (not leaking) or closed LUST sites.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset TypePointDefinition QueriesNoneSpecial ThemingNoneDataset ClassificationLevel 1 – Open, Not Proactively ReleasedKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactEnvironmental and General Services DepartmentTim Eubankstimothy.eubanks@tucsonaz.govPublisher ContactInformation Technology DepartmentGIS_IT@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

Explore the historical Whois records related to water-leak-tape.site (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.

The largest reported data leakage as of January 2025 was the Cam4 data breach in March 2020, which exposed more than 10 billion data records. The second-largest data breach in history so far, the Yahoo data breach, occurred in 2013. The company initially reported about one billion exposed data records, but after an investigation, the company updated the number, revealing that three billion accounts were affected. The National Public Data Breach was announced in August 2024. The incident became public when personally identifiable information of individuals became available for sale on the dark web. Overall, the security professionals estimate the leakage of nearly three billion personal records. The next significant data leakage was the March 2018 security breach of India's national ID database, Aadhaar, with over 1.1 billion records exposed. This included biometric information such as identification numbers and fingerprint scans, which could be used to open bank accounts and receive financial aid, among other government services.

Cybercrime - the dark side of digitalization As the world continues its journey into the digital age, corporations and governments across the globe have been increasing their reliance on technology to collect, analyze and store personal data. This, in turn, has led to a rise in the number of cyber crimes, ranging from minor breaches to global-scale attacks impacting billions of users – such as in the case of Yahoo. Within the U.S. alone, 1802 cases of data compromise were reported in 2022. This was a marked increase from the 447 cases reported a decade prior. The high price of data protection As of 2022, the average cost of a single data breach across all industries worldwide stood at around 4.35 million U.S. dollars. This was found to be most costly in the healthcare sector, with each leak reported to have cost the affected party a hefty 10.1 million U.S. dollars. The financial segment followed closely behind. Here, each breach resulted in a loss of approximately 6 million U.S. dollars - 1.5 million more than the global average.

Between May 2018 and September 2024, France saw eight incidents of significant data breaches. The first recorded case was the May 2018 data breach at Apollo.io. The marketing company based in San Francisco lost approximately 10.93 million data records from French users. The latest reported data breach incident occurred at the France-based security company Thales. As a result of this incident, 9.5 GB of archive files were leaked.

A complete list of live websites affected by CVE-2024-44000, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

Below is an explanation of the data along with some features that are available on this map (description is also provided in the "Getting Started" widget of the application).A variety of different colored circles appear throughout the map. They represent sites that are associated with the following programs:1) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) sites:a) Historical Inactive - Identifies sites from an older database that are non-active sites where, through a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) or other evaluation, DTSC has determined that a removal or remedial action or further extensive investigation is required.b) School Cleanup - Identifies proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. School sites are further defined as “Cleanup”, where remedial actions are or have occurred.c) School Evaluation - Identifies proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. School sites are further defined as “Evaluation”, where further investigation is needed.d) Corrective Action - Investigation or cleanup activities at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or state-only hazardous waste facilities (that were required to obtain a permit or have received a hazardous waste facility permit from DTSC or U.S. EPA).e) State Response - Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.f) Evaluation - Identifies suspected, but unconfirmed, contaminated sites that need or have gone through a limited investigation and assessment process.g) Tiered Permit - A corrective action cleanup project on a hazardous waste facility that either was eligible to treat or permitted to treat waste under the Tiered Permitting system.2) State Water Board or DTSC sites:a) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Cleanup - Includes all Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites that have had an unauthorized release (i.e. leak or spill) of a hazardous substance, usually fuel hydrocarbons, and are being (or have been) cleaned up. These sites are regulated under the State Water Board's UST Cleanup Program and/or similar programs conducted by each of the nine Regional Water Boards or Local Oversight Programs.b) Cleanup Program - Includes all "non-federally owned" sites that are regulated under the State Water Board's Site Cleanup Program and/or similar programs conducted by each of the nine Regional Water Boards. Cleanup Program Sites are also commonly referred to as "Site Cleanup Program sites".c) Voluntary Cleanup - Identifies sites with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases, and the project proponents have requested that the State Water Board or DTSC oversee evaluation, investigation, and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for the lead agency’s costs.3) Othera) Permitted Tanks - The "Permitted Tanks" data set includes Facilities that are associated with permitted underground storage tanks from the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) database. The CERS data consists of current and recently closed permitted underground storage tank (UST) facilities information provided to CERS by Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs).*Note: Underground Storage Tank Cleanup and Cleanup Program project records are pulled from the State Water Board's GeoTracker database. The Permitted Tanks information was obtained from California EPA’s California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) database. All other project records were obtained from DTSC's EnviroStor database. Program descriptions come from DTSC’s EnviroStor Glossary of Terms and the State Water Board’s GeoTracker Site/Facility Type Definitions. The information associated with these records was last updated in the application on 4/24/2023.