Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In the elite domain of interactive sports, athletes who demonstrate a left preference (e.g., holding a weapon with the left hand in fencing or boxing in a ‘southpaw’ stance) seem overrepresented. Such excess indicates a performance advantage and was also interpreted as evidence in favour of frequency-dependent selection mechanisms to explain the maintenance of left-handedness in humans. To test for an overrepresentation, the incidence of athletes' lateral preferences is typically compared with an expected ratio of left- to right-handedness in the normal population. However, the normal population reference values did not always relate to the sport-specific tasks of interest, which may limit the validity of reports of an excess of ‘left-oriented’ athletes. Here we sought to determine lateral preferences for various sport-specific tasks (e.g., baseball batting, boxing) in the normal population and to examine the relationship between these preferences and handedness. To this end, we asked 903 participants to indicate their lateral preferences for sport-specific and common tasks using a paper-based questionnaire. Lateral preferences varied considerably across the different sport tasks and we found high variation in the relationship between those preferences and handedness. In contrast to unimanual tasks (e.g., fencing or throwing), for bimanually controlled actions such as baseball batting, shooting in ice hockey or boxing the incidence of left preferences was considerably higher than expected from the proportion of left-handedness in the normal population and the relationship with handedness was relatively low. We conclude that (i) task-specific reference values are mandatory for reliably testing for an excess of athletes with a left preference, (ii) the term ‘handedness’ should be more cautiously used within the context of sport-related laterality research and (iii) observation of lateral preferences in sports may be of limited suitability for the verification of evolutionary theories of handedness.
According to a study conducted between 2021 and 2022, ** percent of people experiencing homelessness in California left their last housing in the United States due to conflict among residents. A further ** percent said that they left their last housing because they didn't want to impose or because they wanted their own space.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Percentage left-handedness distribution in both the study group and the control group, by age.
In Italy, the share of young people who leave school or traning prematurely is higher among males and than among females. In addition, Southern regions record higher share of young people who end their education prematurely. In 2019, Sicily registered the higher share in the country, with 24.5 percent of males and 20.1 percent of females.
https://www.ine.es/aviso_legalhttps://www.ine.es/aviso_legal
Economically Active Population Survey: Inactive population who have worked previously and left their last job more than 1 year ago by occupation in last job, sex and age group. Percentages with regards the total in each occupation. Annual. National.
https://www.ine.es/aviso_legalhttps://www.ine.es/aviso_legal
Economically Active Population Survey: Unemployed population who have previously worked and left their last job more than 1 year ago by economic sector of last job, sex and age group. Percentages with regards each age group. Annual. National.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘Inactive population who have worked previously and left their last job more than 1 year ago by occupation in last job, sex and age group. Percentages with regards the total in each occupation. EPA (API identifier: 5338)’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/urn-ine-es-tabla-t3-347-5338 on 08 January 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
Table of INEBase Inactive population who have worked previously and left their last job more than 1 year ago by occupation in last job, sex and age group. Percentages with regards the total in each occupation. Annual. National. Economically Active Population Survey
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
https://www.ine.es/aviso_legalhttps://www.ine.es/aviso_legal
Economically Active Population Survey: Inactive population who have worked previously and left their last job more than 1 year ago by professional situation in last job, sex and age group. Percentages with regards the total in each profess. Annual. National.
According to a study conducted between 2021 and 2022, 22 percent of people experiencing homelessness in California said that they left their last housing in the United States due to lost or reduced income. A further 12 percent cited high housing costs as the main economic reason for why they left their last housing.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2018, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to the 2018 edition of the Local Government Areas (LGA). Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes.
AURIN has spatially enabled the data.
Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset.
Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Effect of hiPSI TTN truncating variants, a 0.1 change in fraction of genetic similarity to the AFR reference population, and the interaction of the two covariates in linear regression analysis of change in LVEF accounting for age, sex, and the first five genetic PCs. hiPSI = high percentage spliced in; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; UCB = upper confidence bound; LCB = lower confidence bound; AFR = genetically similar to the 1000 Genomes Project African reference population.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2019, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2), according to the 2016 edition of the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS). Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes.
AURIN has spatially enabled the data.
Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset.
Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
Age-sex charts emphasize the gap between the numbers of males and females at a specific age group. It also illustrates the age and gender trends across all age and gender groupings. A chart skewed heavily to the left describes a very young population while a chart skewed heavily to the right illustrates an aging population.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2018, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2), according to the 2016 edition of the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS). Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes. AURIN has spatially enabled the data. Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset. Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
Attribute names and descriptions are as follows:
STATE - Census State Number
COUNTY - Census County Number
TRACT - Census Tract Number
plltn_p - Clean Environment domain score (average of Z-scores of Diesel PM, Ozone, PM 2.5, Safe Drinking Water), statewide percentile ranking
atmbl_p - Percentage of households with access to an automobile, statewide percentile ranking
cmmt_pc - Percentage of workers, 16 years and older, who commute to work by transit, walking, or cycling, statewide percentile ranking
emplyd_ - Percentage of population aged 20-64 who are employed, statewide percentile ranking
abvpvr_ - Percent of the population with an income exceeding 200% of federal poverty level, statewide percentile ranking
prkccs_ - Percentage of the population living within a half-mile of a park, beach, or open space greater than 1 acre, statewide percentile ranking
trcnpy_ - Population-weighted percentage of the census tract area with tree canopy, statewide percentile ranking
twprnt_ - Percentage of family households with children under 18 with two parents, statewide percentile ranking
ozn_pct - Mean of summer months of the daily maximum 8-hour ozone concentration (ppm) averaged over three years (2012 to 2014), statewide percentile ranking
pm25_pc - Annual mean concentration of PM2.5 (average of quarterly means, μg/m3), over three years (2012 to 2014), statewide percentile ranking
dslpm_p - Spatial distribution of gridded diesel PM emissions from on-road and non-road sources for a 2012 summer day in July, statewide percentile ranking
h20cnt_ - Cal EnviroScreen 3.0 drinking water contaminant index for selected contaminants, statewide percentile ranking
wht_pct - Percent of Whites in the total population (not a percentile)
heatdays - Projected annual number of extreme heat days at 2070, (not a percentile)
impervsu_5 - Percent impervious surface cover, statewide percentile ranking
transita_5 - Percent of population residing within ½ mile of a major transit stop, statewide percentile ranking
uhii_pctil - Urban heat island index: sum of 182 day temp. differences (degree-hr) between urban and rural reference, statewide percentile ranking
traffic_1 - Sum of traffic volumes adjusted by road segment length divided by total road length within 150 meters of the census tract boundary, statewide percentile ranking
children_1 - Percent of population under 5 years of age, statewide percentile ranking
elders_p_1 - Percent of population 65 years of age and older, statewide percentile ranking
englishs_5 - Percentage of households where at least one person 14 years and older speaks English very well, statewide percentile ranking
pedshurt_1 - 5-year (2006-2010) annual average rate of severe and fatal pedestrian injuries per 100,000 population, statewide percentile ranking
leb_pctile - Life expectancy at birth in 2010, statewide percentile ranking
abvpvty_s - Poverty, lowest 25th percentile statewide
employ_s - Unemployed, lowest 25th percentile statewide
twoprnt_s - Two Parent Households, lowest 25th percentile statewide
chldrn_s - Young Children, lowest 25th percentile statewide
elderly_s - Elderly, lowest 25th percentile statewide
englishs_s - Non-English Speaking, lowest 25th percentile statewide
majorwht_s - Majority Minority Population, over 50 percent of population non-white
D1_Social - Social barriers to accessing outdoor opportunities, combined indicators score
actvcom_s - Limited Active Commuting, lowest 25th percentile statewide
autoacc_s - Limited Automobile Access, lowest 25th percentile statewide
transita_s - Limited Public Transit Access, lowest 25th percentile statewide
trafficd_s - Traffic Density, lowest 25th percentile statewide
pedinjry_s - Pedestrian Injuries, lowest 25th percentile statewide
D2_Transp - Transportation barriers to accessing outdoor opportunities, combined indicators score
expbirth_s - Life Expectancy at Birth, lowest 25th percentile statewide
clneviro_s - Pollution, lowest 25th percentile statewide
D3_Health - Health Vulnerability, combined indicators score
parkacc_s - Limited Park Access, lowest 25th percentile statewide
treecan_s - Limited Tree Canopy, lowest 25th percentile statewide
impsurf_s - Impervious Surface, lowest 25th percentile statewide
exheat_s - Excessive Heat Days, highest of four quantiles
hisland_s - Urban Heat Island Index, lowest 25th percentile statewide
D4_Environ Environmental Vulnerability, combined indicators score
D1_Multi Multiple indicators (2 or more) with social barriers to accessessing outdoor opportunities
D2_Multi Multiple indicators (2 or more) with transportation barriers to accessessing outdoor opportunities
D3_Multi Multiple indicators (1 or more) with health vulnerability
D4_Multi Multiple indicators (2 or more) with environmental vulnerability
Comp_DIM - Multiple Indicators, combined dimensions score
D1_Major - Majority indicators (4 or more) with social barriers to accessessing outdoor opportunities
D2_Major - Majority indicators (3 or more) with transportation barriers to accessessing outdoor opportunities
D3_Major - Majority indicators (1 or more) with health vulnerability
D4_Major - Majority indicators (3 or more) with environmental vulnerability
Comp_DIM_2 - Majority Indicators, combined dimensions score
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2017, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to the 2017 edition of the Local Government Areas (LGA). Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes.
AURIN has spatially enabled the data.
Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset.
Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global market for left-handed outswing front entry doors presents a compelling investment opportunity. While precise market size data for this niche segment is unavailable, we can extrapolate from the broader entry door market. Considering the overall entry door market's substantial size (let's assume a global market value of $25 billion in 2025 for illustrative purposes, reflecting a reasonable estimate based on industry reports), and assuming left-handed outswing doors constitute approximately 5% of the total market (a conservative estimate considering left-handed individuals comprise around 10% of the population but acknowledging a lower adoption rate due to niche specifics), the 2025 market size for this segment is estimated at $1.25 billion. Driving growth are factors such as increasing home construction and renovation activity, rising demand for customized and aesthetically pleasing doors, and a growing focus on accessibility and inclusivity, catering to the needs of left-handed individuals. Key trends include the integration of smart home technology, the preference for energy-efficient materials like fiberglass and steel, and innovative designs that enhance both security and curb appeal. However, constraints include fluctuating raw material prices, supply chain disruptions, and regional economic variations. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is projected to be 4.5% from 2025 to 2033, indicating steady market expansion during this period. This growth will be influenced by market penetration in developing economies and the continued adoption of eco-friendly, high-performance door materials. The segmentation of the left-handed outswing front entry door market mirrors the larger entry door market. Material type (aluminum, glass, wood, steel, fiberglass) and application (commercial, residential) are key differentiators. Aluminum and fiberglass are expected to show robust growth due to their durability and cost-effectiveness. The residential segment is anticipated to dominate, fueled by increased homeownership rates and renovation projects. Key players in the market, including established manufacturers like Andersen, Jeld-Wen, and Pella, are strategically focusing on innovation and differentiation to maintain their competitive edge. Regional growth patterns reflect global construction and economic activity, with North America and Europe projected as major markets. A deeper regional breakdown would reveal variations based on factors like building codes, cultural preferences, and economic conditions.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2019, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to the 2019 edition of the Local Government Areas (LGA). Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes. AURIN has spatially enabled the data. Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset. Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents the summary preliminary estimates of the resident population by age and sex as at 30 June 2017, this includes population by sex, median age by sex and percentage of the population within a certain age range. The data is aggregated to Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2), according to the 2016 edition of the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS).
Estimated resident population (ERP) is the official estimate of the Australian population, which links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence within Australia refers to that address at which the person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in a given reference year. For the 30 June reference date, this refers to the calendar year around it. Estimates of the resident population are based on Census counts by place of usual residence (excluding short-term overseas visitors in Australia), with an allowance for Census net undercount, to which are added the estimated number of Australian residents temporarily overseas at the time of the Census. A person is regarded as a usual resident if they have been (or expected to be) residing in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period.
This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 3235.0) available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
For more information please visit the Explanatory Notes.
AURIN has spatially enabled the data.
Regions which contain unpublished data have been left blank in the dataset.
Where regions have zero population, the relating ratio and percentage columns have been left blank.
This table contains 2394 series, with data for years 1991 - 1991 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 items: Canada ...), Population group (19 items: Entire cohort; Income adequacy quintile 1 (lowest);Income adequacy quintile 2;Income adequacy quintile 3 ...), Age (14 items: At 25 years; At 30 years; At 40 years; At 35 years ...), Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...), Characteristics (3 items: Life expectancy; High 95% confidence interval; life expectancy; Low 95% confidence interval; life expectancy ...).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In the elite domain of interactive sports, athletes who demonstrate a left preference (e.g., holding a weapon with the left hand in fencing or boxing in a ‘southpaw’ stance) seem overrepresented. Such excess indicates a performance advantage and was also interpreted as evidence in favour of frequency-dependent selection mechanisms to explain the maintenance of left-handedness in humans. To test for an overrepresentation, the incidence of athletes' lateral preferences is typically compared with an expected ratio of left- to right-handedness in the normal population. However, the normal population reference values did not always relate to the sport-specific tasks of interest, which may limit the validity of reports of an excess of ‘left-oriented’ athletes. Here we sought to determine lateral preferences for various sport-specific tasks (e.g., baseball batting, boxing) in the normal population and to examine the relationship between these preferences and handedness. To this end, we asked 903 participants to indicate their lateral preferences for sport-specific and common tasks using a paper-based questionnaire. Lateral preferences varied considerably across the different sport tasks and we found high variation in the relationship between those preferences and handedness. In contrast to unimanual tasks (e.g., fencing or throwing), for bimanually controlled actions such as baseball batting, shooting in ice hockey or boxing the incidence of left preferences was considerably higher than expected from the proportion of left-handedness in the normal population and the relationship with handedness was relatively low. We conclude that (i) task-specific reference values are mandatory for reliably testing for an excess of athletes with a left preference, (ii) the term ‘handedness’ should be more cautiously used within the context of sport-related laterality research and (iii) observation of lateral preferences in sports may be of limited suitability for the verification of evolutionary theories of handedness.