The Rangeland Department in the Kamloops District from the Government of British Columbia has recently raised concerns regarding the observation on the reduction of the number and the surface area of the grassland ponds in the Lac du Bois Grasslands Protected Area. This study aims to distinguish between the ponds with stable groundwater inputs (i.e. connected ponds) and the ponds with unstable groundwater inputs (i.e. perched ponds) to assist the government in determining reliable water sources. This research started by categorizing ponds with different surface areas as either low resilience or threatened resilience. Different terrain models were created using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data in addition to the calculation of the topographic wetness index (TWI). The classifications were validated using Google Earth and drone imagery. An overall of 121 ponds was discovered with 86 of them considered as low resilience, while the remaining 27 ponds being threatened resilience. For the low resilience ponds, 19 of them were identified as perched ponds, 47 as connected ponds, and 20 as intermediate ponds with the risk of having unstable groundwater connection that requires further analysis in the field. For the threatened resilience ponds, 5 of them were found to be perched ponds, 17 as connected ponds, and 5 as intermediate ponds. The outcome of the pond distribution indicates that the perched ponds were more likely to be found in an area with a flat slope, surrounded by grass, and low canopy coverage. Additionally, the calculated TWI was unable to differentiate between the pond types as the median groundwater levels are spatially dependent on the local topographic features.

The layers included in the code were from the study conducted by the research group of CNR-IBE (Institute of BioEconomy of the National Research Council of Italy) and ISPRA (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research), published by the Sustainability journal (https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148412).

Link to the Google Earth Engine (GEE) code (link: https://code.earthengine.google.com/715aa44e13b3640b5f6370165edd3002)

You can analyze and visualize the following spatial layers by accessing the GEE link:

Daytime summer land surface temperature (raster data, horizontal resolution 30 m, from Landsat-8 remote sensing data, years 2015-2019)

Surface thermal hot-spot (raster data, horizontal resolution 30 m) was obtained by using a statistical-spatial method based on the Getis-Ord Gi* approach through the ArcGIS Pro tool.

Surface albedo (raster data, horizontal resolution 10 m, Sentinel-2A remote sensing data, year 2017)

Impervious area (raster data, horizontal resolution 10 m, ISPRA data, year 2017)

Tree cover (raster data, horizontal resolution 10 m, ISPRA data, year 2018)

Grassland area (raster data, horizontal resolution 10 m, ISPRA data, year 2017)

Water bodies (raster data, horizontal resolution 2 m, Geoscopio Platform of Tuscany, year 2016)

Sky View Factor (raster data, horizontal resolution 1 m, lidar data from the OpenData platform of Florence, year 2016)

Buildings' units of Florence (shapefile from the OpenData platform of Florence) include data on the residential real estate value from the Real Estate Market Observatory (OMI) of the National Revenue Agency of Italy (source: https://www1.agenziaentrate.gov.it/servizi/Consultazione/ricerca.htm, accessed on 14 July 2022). Data on the characterization of the buffer area (50 m) surrounding the buildings are included in this shapefile [the names of table attributes are reported in the square brackets]: averaged values of the daytime summer land surface temperature [LST_media], thermal hot-spot pattern [Thermal_cl], mean values of sky view factor [SVF_medio], surface albedo [alb_medio], and average percentage areas of imperviousness [ImperArea%], tree cover [TreeArea%], grassland [GrassArea%] and water bodies [WaterArea%].

Here attached the .txt file of the GEE code.

E-mail

Giulia Guerri, CNR-IBE, giulia.guerri@ibe.cnr.it

Marco Morabito, CNR-IBE, marco.morabito@cnr.it

Alfonso Crisci, CNR-IBE, alfonso.crisci@ibe.cnr.it

The AHN DEM is a 0.5m DEM covering the Netherlands. It was generated from LIDAR data taken in the spring between 2007 and 2012. It contains ground level samples with all other items above ground (such as buildings, bridges, trees etc.) removed. This version is non-interpolated; the areas where objects …

The AHN DEM is a 0.5m DEM covering the Netherlands. It was generated from LIDAR data taken in the spring between 2007 and 2012. This version contains both ground level samples and items above ground level (such as buildings, bridges, trees etc). The point cloud was converted to a 0.5m …

Web map displaying Wisconsin DNR-produced Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and Hillshade image services, along with their index layer, in formats that are clickable and can be symbolized and filtered. This map can also be used as a starting point to create a new map. To open the web map from DNR's GIS Open Data Portal, click the View Metadata: link to the right of the description, then click Open in Map Viewer.

The global navigation map market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption of location-based services across various sectors. Our analysis projects a market size of $15 billion in 2025, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The automotive industry's reliance on advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles is a primary driver, demanding high-precision and regularly updated map data. Furthermore, the proliferation of mobile devices with integrated GPS and mapping applications continues to stimulate market growth. The burgeoning enterprise solutions segment, utilizing navigation maps for logistics, fleet management, and delivery optimization, contributes significantly to overall market value. Government and public sector initiatives promoting smart cities and infrastructure development further fuel demand. Technological advancements, such as the integration of LiDAR and improved GIS data, enhance map accuracy and functionality, attracting more users and driving market expansion. The market segmentation reveals substantial contributions from various application areas. The automotive segment is projected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period, followed closely by the mobile devices and enterprise solutions segments. Within the type segment, GIS data holds a significant market share due to its versatility and application across various sectors. However, LiDAR data is experiencing rapid growth, driven by its high precision and suitability for autonomous driving applications. Geographic regional analysis indicates strong market presence in North America and Europe, primarily driven by advanced technological infrastructure and high adoption rates. However, the Asia-Pacific region is poised for substantial growth, fueled by rapid urbanization, increasing smartphone penetration, and government investments in infrastructure development. Competitive landscape analysis reveals a blend of established players and emerging technology companies, signifying an increasingly dynamic and innovative market environment.

This dataset consists of near-global, analysis-ready, multi-resolution gridded vegetation structure metrics derived from NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 2 and 4A products associated with 25-m diameter lidar footprints. This dataset provides a comprehensive representation of near-global vegetation structure that is inclusive of the entire vertical profile, based solely …

Shallow nearshore coastal waters provide a wealth of societal, economic and ecosystem services, yet their structure is poorly mapped due to the use of expensive and time intensive methods. Bathymetric mapping from space has sought to alleviate this but has remained dependent upon in situ water-based measurements. Here we fuse ICESat-2 lidar data with Sentinel-2 optical imagery, within the Google Earth Engine geospatial cloud platform, to create wall-to-wall high-resolution bathymetric maps at regional-to-national scales in Florida, Crete and Bermuda. ICESat-2 bathymetric classified photons are used to train three common Satellite Derived Bathymetry (SDB) methods, including Lyzenga, Stumpf and Support Vector Regression algorithms. For each study site the Lyzenga algorithm yielded the lowest RMSE (approx. 10-15%) when compared with in situ NOAA DEM data. We demonstrate a means of using ICESat-2 for both model calibration and validation, thus cementing a pathway for a fully space-borne approach to map nearshore bathymetry. Here we provide the Sentinel-2 mosaics, ICESat-2 bathymetric profiles and Satellite-Derived Bathymetry (SDB) models

This is a table with metadata for the 3DEP 10m DEM asset. The Work unit Extent Spatial Metadata (WESM) contains current lidar data availability and basic information about lidar projects, including lidar quality level, data acquisition dates, and links to project-level metadata. See more details in this document (taken from this page). Dataset uploaded by Farmers Business Network.

The High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) product is derived from airborne LiDAR data (mainly in the south) and satellite images in the north. The complete coverage of the Canadian territory is gradually being established. It includes a Digital Terrain Model (DTM), a Digital Surface Model (DSM) and other derived data. For DTM datasets, derived data available are slope, aspect, shaded relief, color relief and color shaded relief maps and for DSM datasets, derived data available are shaded relief, color relief and color shaded relief maps. The productive forest line is used to separate the northern and the southern parts of the country. This line is approximate and may change based on requirements. In the southern part of the country (south of the productive forest line), DTM and DSM datasets are generated from airborne LiDAR data. They are offered at a 1 m or 2 m resolution and projected to the UTM NAD83 (CSRS) coordinate system and the corresponding zones. The datasets at a 1 m resolution cover an area of 10 km x 10 km while datasets at a 2 m resolution cover an area of 20 km by 20 km. In the northern part of the country (north of the productive forest line), due to the low density of vegetation and infrastructure, only DSM datasets are generally generated. Most of these datasets have optical digital images as their source data. They are generated at a 2 m resolution using the Polar Stereographic North coordinate system referenced to WGS84 horizontal datum or UTM NAD83 (CSRS) coordinate system. Each dataset covers an area of 50 km by 50 km. For some locations in the north, DSM and DTM datasets can also be generated from airborne LiDAR data. In this case, these products will be generated with the same specifications as those generated from airborne LiDAR in the southern part of the country. The HRDEM product is referenced to the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013), which is now the reference standard for heights across Canada. Source data for HRDEM datasets is acquired through multiple projects with different partners. Since data is being acquired by project, there is no integration or edgematching done between projects. The tiles are aligned within each project. The product High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) is part of the CanElevation Series created in support to the National Elevation Data Strategy implemented by NRCan. Collaboration is a key factor to the success of the National Elevation Data Strategy. Refer to the “Supporting Document” section to access the list of the different partners including links to their respective data.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) contracted the National Ecological Observatory Network Airborne Observation Platform (NEON AOP) to observe watersheds of interest surrounding Crested Butte, CO with remotely sensed data, including LiDAR. The flight box design encompassed the watersheds, surveying a total area of 334 km2 across 72 lines. The instrument used was an Optech Gemini, with a pulse density of 2-9 pulses m-2 across the study area (see final report document for detailed information). These LiDAR data are the primary data that were provided by NEON including LAZ files of a classified point cloud, and geotifs of a digital surface elevation model, digital terrain elevation model, and a canopy height model at 1 m resolution with a height threshold of > 2 m. Raster files can also be found on Google Earth Engine: https://code.earthengine.google.com/5c96bbc96ffd50e3c8b1433b34a0bb86.

Two 30-m resolution aboveground woody biomass (AGWB) model for the Brazilian Cerrado biome built based on optical satellite imagery (Landsat-5 and Landsat-8) and SAR imagery (ALOS and ALOS-2), using two machine learning algorithms (Random Forest and CART). Field data used to calibrate the models include and a set of plot-based and LiDAR-derived AGWB estimates (n=1,858) from a wide network of researchers in Brazil

This data set is derived from the original 2005 B4 lidar dataset collected over the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones in southern California, USA. These data have provided a fundamental resource for study of active faulting in southern California since they were released in 2005. However, these data were not classified in a manner that allowed for easy differentiation between bare ground surfaces and the objects and vegetation above that surface. This reprocessed (classified) dataset allows researchers easy and direct access to a "bare-earth" digital elevation data set as gridded half-meter resolution rasters (elevation and shaded relief), "full-feature" digital elevation models as gridded one-meter resolution rasters (elevation and shaded relief) and as classified (according to ASPRS standards) point clouds in binary .laz format, and a spatial index in shapefile and Google Earth KML format. The reprocessing of the 2005 B4 dataset was performed by Dr. Stephen B DeLong, USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, as a service to the community. The data available here were originally published on the USGS ScienceBase website as Classified point cloud and gridded elevation data from the 2005 B4 Lidar Project, southern California, USA.

Original B4 project description: The B4 Lidar Project collected lidar point cloud data of the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults in southern California. Data acquisition and processing were performed by the National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) in partnership with the USGS and Ohio State University through funding from the EAR Geophysics program at the National Science Foundation (NSF). Optech International contributed the ALTM3100 laser scanner system. UNAVCO and SCIGN assisted in GPS ground control and continuous high rate GPS data acquisition. A group of volunteers from USGS, UCSD, UCLA, Caltech and private industry, as well as gracious landowners along the fault zones, also made the project possible. If you utilize the B4 data for talks, posters or publications, we ask that you acknowledge the B4 project. The B4 logo can be downloaded here. More information about the B4 Project.

Publications associated with this dataset can be found at NCALM's Data Tracking Center

The global forest canopy height map with a resolution of 30 m for 2020 (GlobeFCH_2020_30m_v1) was generated by integrating the new-generation space-borne LiDAR (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation, GEDI; Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2, ICESat-2), Sentinel-1 SAR images, Sentinel-2 optical images and other ancillary data based on Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. The coordinate system of the GlobeFCH_2020_30m_v1 is World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) and the unit of the forest canopy height value is centimeter. The GlobeFCH_2020_30m_v1 was divided into 305 files, and the range of each file is 10°×10°.

The RGE ALTI dataset describes the digital elevation model (DEM) of France with the pixel size of 1m. It was created from surveys obtained by airborne lidar or by correlation of aerial images. Lidar was deployed for flood-prone, coastal, and large forest areas. The vertical accuracy of the DEM in these areas is between 0.2m and 0.5m. Radar was used in mountain areas (Alps, Pyrenees, Cevennes, Corsica). Caution: in areas with steep slopes, the average vertical accuracy is the order of 7m. The accuracy of these fields has been checked against various sources: the road and hydrographic networks of the BD TOPO, geodetic terminals and points calculated on the ground. Aerial photo correlation techniques are used in the rest of the territory. On certain zones treated by correlation, ground measurements are absent over large extents due to the presence of vegetation (wooded areas, for example). 1987-2001 altimetry data (BD Alti) are used to fill these gaps. The vertical accuracy of the DEM on these areas is between 0.5m and 0.7m. Currently the collection includes a single image IGN/RGE_ALTI/1M/2_0/FXX showing metropolitan France. This dataset was prepared and ingested with the support of Guillaume Attard and Julien Bardonnet (AGEOCE). The preparation process is described here. See also: user's guide.

BLM 3DEP LIDAR Priority Planning Areas map service for viewing BLM’s participation to the USGS 3DEP (3D Elevation Program) to collaborate to acquire high-resolution LiDAR data that is available through the USGS National Map. The implementation of this map service allows the BLM to have more flexibility for tracking ongoing BLM 3DEP acquisition through this USGS and BLM partnership. Additionally, BLM high, medium, and low priorities are included, as well as areas where BLM projects have been completed and are available on the USGS National Map.

This data set is derived from the original 2005 data collected over the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones in southern California, USA. These data have provided a fundamental resource for study of active faulting in southern California since they were released in 2005. However, these data were not classified in a manner that allowed for easy differentiation between bare ground surfaces and the objects and vegetation above that surface. This reprocessed (classified) dataset allows researchers easy and direct access to a "bare-earth" digital elevation data set as gridded half-meter resolution rasters (elevation and shaded relief) , "full-feature" digital elevation models as gridded one-meter resolution rasters (elevation and shaded relief) and as classified (according to ASPRS standards) point clouds in binary .laz format, and a spatial index in shapefile and Google Earth KML format.

This Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) LAS dataset is a topographic survey conducted for a coalition of GIS practitioners, including the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM), Florida Water Management Districts, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, and other state and federal agencies. The goal for this project is to use the LiDAR data as new elevation inputs for updated SLOSH data grids. The ultimate result is the update of the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Studies (RHES) for the state. The State of Florida Division of Emergency Management LiDAR Survey was collected under the guidance of a Professional Mapper/Surveyor. This data was collected for a portion of Levy County, Florida from 1 July - August 16 2007. This is a classified lidar data set; bare-earth points (class 2), water returns (class 9), and unclassified data (class 1). The LiDAR data was flown at a density sufficient to support a maximum final post spacing of 4 feet for unobscured areas. A footprint of this data set may be viewed in Google Earth at: ftp://coast.noaa.gov/pub/DigitalCoast/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/530/supplemental/FDEM_Lidar_Levy_County.kmz

Feature class that compare the elevations between seawall crests (extracted from available LiDAR datasets from 2010 and 2013) with published FEMA Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) from preliminary FEMA DFIRMS (Panels issued in 2018 and 2019) in coastal York and Cumberland counties (up through Willard Beach in South Portland). The dataset included the development of an inventory of coastal armor structures from a range of different datasets. Feature classes include the following:Steps to create the dataset included:Shoreline structures from the most recent NOAA EVI LANDWARD_SHORETYPE feature class were extracted using the boundaries of York and Cumberland counties. This included 1B: Exposed, Solid Man-Made structures, 8B: Sheltered, Solid Man-Made Structures; 6B: Riprap, and 8C: Sheltered Riprap. This resulted in the creation of Cumberland_ESIL_Structures and York_ESIL_Structures. Note that ESIL uses the MHW line as the feature base.Shoreline structures from the work by Rice (2015) were extracted using the York and Cumberland county boundaries. This resulted in the creation of Cumberland_Rice_Structures and York_Rice_Structures.Additional feature classes for structures were created for York and Cumberland county structures that were missed. This was Slovinsky_York_Structures and Slovinsky_Cumberland_Structures. GoogleEarth imagery was inspected while additional structures were being added to the GIS. 2012 York and Cumberland County imagery was used as the basemap, and structures were classified as bulkheads, rip rap, or dunes (if known). Also, whether or not the structure was in contact with the 2015 HAT was noted.MEDEP was consulted to determine which permit data (both PBR and Individual Permit, IP, data) could be used to help determine where shoreline stabilization projects may have been conducted adjacent to or on coastal bluffs. A file was received for IP data and brought into GIS (DEP_Licensing_Points). This is a point file for shoreline stabilization permits under NRPA.Clip GISVIEW.MEDEP.Permit_By_Rule_Locations to the boundaries of the study area and output DEP_PBR_Points.Join GISVIEW.sde>GISVIEW.MEDEP.PBR_ACTIVITY to the DEP_PBR_Points using the PBR_ID Field. Then, export this file as DEP_PBR_Points2. Using the new ACTIVITY_DESC field, select only those activities that relate to shoreline stabilization projects:PBR_ACTIVITY ACTIVITY_DESC02 Act. Adjacent to a Protected Natural Resource04 Maint Repair & Replacement of Structure08 Shoreline StabilizationSelect by Attributes > PBR_ACTIVITY IN (‘02’, ‘04’, ‘08’) select only those activities likely to be related to shoreline stabilization, and export the selected data as a DEP_PBR_Points3. Then delete 1 and 2, and rename this final product as DEP_PBR_Points.Next, visually inspect the Licensing and PBR files using ArcMap 2012, 2013 imagery, along with Google Earth imagery to determine the extents of armoring along the shoreline.Using EVI and Rice data as indicators, manually inspect and digitize sections of the coastline that are armored. Classify the seaward shoreline type (beach, mudflat, channel, dune, etc.) and the armor type (wall or bulkhead). Bring in the HAT line and, using that and visual indicators, identify whether or not the armored sections are in contact with HAT. Use Google Earth at the same time as digitizing in order to help constrain areas. Merge digitized armoring into Cumberland_York_Merged.Bring the preliminary FEMA DFIRM data in and use “intersect” to assign the different flood zones and elevations to the digitized armored sections. This was done first for Cumberland, then for York Counties. Delete ancillary attributes, as needed. Resulting layer is Cumberland_Structure_FloodZones and York_Structure_FloodZones.Go to NOAA Digital Coast Data Layers and download newest LiDAR data for York and Cumberland county beach, dune, and just inland areas. This includes 2006 and newer topobathy data available from 2010 (entire coast), and selected areas from 2013 and 2014 (Wells, Scarborough, Kennebunk).Mosaic the 2006, 2010, 2013 and 2014 data (with 2013 and 2014 being the first dataset laying on top of the 2010 data) Mosaic this dataset into the sacobaydem_ftNAVD raster (this is from the MEGIS bare-earth model). This will cover almost all of the study area except for armor along several areas in York. Resulting in LidAR206_2010_2013_Mosaic.tif.Using the LiDAR data as a proxy, create a “seaward crest” line feature class which follows along the coast and extracts the approximate highest point (cliff, bank, dune) along the shoreline. This will be used to extract LiDAR data and compare with preliminary flood zone information. The line is called Dune_Crest.Using an added tool Points Along Line, create points at 5 m spacing along each of the armored shoreline feature lines and the dune crest lines. Call the outputs PointsonLines and PointsonDunes.Using Spatial Analyst, Extract LIDAR elevations to the points using the 2006_2010_2013 Mosaic first. Call this LidarPointsonLines1. Select those points which have NULL values, export as this LiDARPointsonLines2. Then rerun Extract Values to Points using just the selected data and the state MEGIS DEM. Convert RASTERVALU to feet by multiplying by 3.2808 (and rename as Elev_ft). Select by Attributes, find all NULL values, and in an edit session, delete them from LiDARPointsonLines. Then, merge the 2 datasets and call it LidarPointsonLines. Do the same above with dune lines and create LidarPointsonDunes.Next, use the Cumberland and York flood zone layers to intersect the points with the appropriate flood zone data. Create ….CumbFIRM and …YorkFIRM files for the dunes and lines.Select those points from the Dunes feature class that are within the X zone – these will NOT have an associated BFE for comparison with the Lidar data. Export the Dune Points as Cumberland_York_Dunes_XZone. Run NEAR and use the merged flood zone feature class (with only V, AE, and AO zones selected). Then, join the flood zone data to the feature class using FID (from the feature class) and OBJECTID (from the flood zone feature class). Export as Cumberland_York_Dunes_XZone_Flood. Delete ancillary columns of data, leaving the original FLD_ZONE (X), Elev_ft, NEAR_DIST (distance, in m, to the nearest flood zone), FLD_ZONE_1 (the near flood zone), and the STATIC_BFE_1 (the nearest static BFE).Do the same as above, except with the Structures file (Cumberland_York_Structures_Lidar_DFIRM_Merged), but also select those features that are within the X zone and the OPEN WATER. Export the points as Cumberland_York_Structures_XZone. Again, run the NEAR using the merged flood zone and only AE, VE, and AO zones selected. Export the file as Cumberland_York_Structures_XZone_Flood.Merge the above feature classes with the original feature classes. Add a field BFE_ELEV_COMPARE. Select all those features whose attributes have a VE or AE flood zone and use field calculator to calculate the difference between the Elev_ft and the BFE (subtracting the STATIC_BFE from Elev_ft). Positive values mean the maximum wall value is higher than the BFE, while negative values mean the max is below the BFE. Then, select the remaining values with switch selection. Calculate the same value but use the NEAR_STATIC_BFE value instead. Select by Attributes>FLD_ZONE=AO, and use the DEPTH value to enter into the above created fields as negative values. Delete ancilary attribute fields, leaving those listed in the _FINAL feature classes described above the process steps section.

Terrestrial LiDAR data collected by the team at University College London.

This is Version 1 containing raw data in RIEGL .rxp format for all scan positions as well as corresponding rotation matrices

UCL project name: 2017-07-18.001.riproject

Plot ID: STP

State or region: Camden

Date project started: 7/18/2017

Area scanned: 25,392 m2

Instrument: UCL RIEGL VZ-400

Scan pattern: 19 positions

Angular resolution: 0.04

Images captured: No

Number of scans: 19.0

Google Maps URL: https://www.google.com/maps/place/The+Hardy+Tree/@51.5348275,-0.1302261,19.07z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x48761b22ae4a50ff:0x5ee5e6d9819cb888!8m2!3d51.5351276!4d-0.1297699

Publications: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0098-0, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112102

For more information on the methods used to capture TLS data please refer to Wilkes et al. 2017

Please acknowldege the producers of this data set if using this data for publication.