Use this layer to join non-spatial data: https://ph-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/3e38574c3d31477d908c8028fb864ca4/aboutFor more information about the Community Health Profiles data initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Health profiles for all LA areas presenting a range of indicators and a snapshot of the overall health of the local population. The Department of Health was previously responsible for the publication of Local Health Profiles.

Source agency: Public Health England

Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics

Language: English

Alternative title: Local Health Profiles

Users can join these boundaries to non-spatial tables in order to create maps of Community Health Profiles data. For more information about the Community Health Profiles project, please see the project homepage.

Child Health Profiles provide a snapshot of child health and well-being for each local authority in England using key health indicators, which enable comparison locally, regionally and nationally. The Department of Health was previously responsible for the publication of Child Health Profiles.

Source agency: Public Health England

Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics

Language: English

Alternative title: Local Authority Child Health Profiles

For more information about the Community Health Profiles data initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), the purpose of this survey of local health departments (LHDs) was to advance and support the development of a database for LHDs to describe and understand their structure, function, and capacities. A core set of questions was submitted to every LHD. In addition, some LHDs received one of two randomly assigned modules of supplemental questions. The core questions covered governance, funding, workforce (staffing levels, occupations employed, top executive education and licensure), LHD activities, community health assessment and health improvement planning, use of the Community Guide of Preventive Services, and policy-making and advocacy. The surveyed LHD activities include immunization, screening for diseases and conditions, treatment for communicable diseases, maternal and child health, epidemiology and surveillance activities, population-based primary prevention activities, and regulation, inspection and/or licensing activities. Topics covered by Module 1 included quality improvement, accreditation through the Public Health Accreditation Board, sharing of resources across LHDs, human resources issues, partnerships and collaboration with other organizations in the community, practice-based research, health impact assessments, use of the County Health Rankings reports, and collaboration with public health institutes. Module 2 examined emergency preparedness, public health informatics, access to health care services, and health disparities.

These reports provide summary information about mental health service utilization funded through Medicaid for Local Fiscal Years, beginning in service year 2006 and updated yearly thereafter. Totals are based on date of service and data are refreshed on a monthly basis so values in the same report may change over time. Prepaid Mental Health Plan (PMHP) data are included in these reports as Recovery Services (RS); however, Medicaid Managed Care data are not included. Expenditures include Comprehensive Outpatient Program Services (COPS) and Community Support Program (CSP) add-on payments, where applicable.

For more information about the Community Health Profiles data initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

County Health Status Profiles is an annually published report for the State of California by the California Department of Public Health in collaboration with the California Conference of Local Health Officers. Health indicators are measured for 58 counties and California statewide that can be directly compared to national standards and populations of similar composition. Where available, the measurements are ranked and compared with target rates established for Healthy People National Objectives.

For tables where the health indicator denominator and numerator are derived from the same data source, the denominator excludes records for which the health indicator data is missing and unable to be imputed.

For more information see the County Health Status Profiles report.

Conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), the purpose of this survey of local health departments (LHDs) was to advance and support the development of a database for LHDs to describe and understand their structure, function, and capacities. A core set of questions was submitted to every LHD. In addition, some LHDs received one of two randomly assigned modules of supplemental questions. Data from the National Profile of Local Health Departments survey are used by: LHD staff members to compare their LHD or those within their states to others nationwide; Policymakers at the local, state, and federal levels to inform public health policy and support projects to improve local public health practice; Universities to educate future public health workforce members about LHDs; Researchers to address questions about public health practice; andNACCHO staff to develop programs and resources that meet the needs of LHDs and to advocate effectively for LHDs. Data included as part of this collection includes the Public-Use (Restricted-Use Level 1) data of the National Profile of Local Health Departments 2016 study. The dataset includes 1930 cases for 1112 variables.

Health profiles at local authority level including general health, child health, alcohol and tobacco related health issues

Descriptive summary of studies included in systematic review and meta-analysis of CBHI enrolment and its determinants in Ethiopia, 2017–2022.

Data for cities, communities, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts were generated using a small area estimation method which combined the survey data with population benchmark data (2022 population estimates for Los Angeles County) and neighborhood characteristics data (e.g., U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates). This indicator includes adults who self-reported fair or poor health status when asked about their health in general. Self-rated health is associated with other more objective measures of health and is also a predictor for mortality. Self-rated health is also correlated with general wellbeing, an important population health outcome that integrates both mental and physical health. As is the case for nearly all health outcomes, self-rated health is heavily influenced by the social determinants of health.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Data are for noninstitutionalized civilian population.The vast majority of adults and children in Los Angeles County have health insurance, in large part due to outreach efforts and local insurance availability for children and the expansion of insurance coverage following the passage of the federal Affordable Care Act in 2012. Despite this progress, rates of uninsured remain high in some communities. Cities and community organizations can play an important role in advocating for needed services and in providing information on free or low-cost services in their communities. Hospitals can also provide medical and dental services through their community benefit programs and other community services.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Find Massachusetts health data by community, county, and region, including population demographics. Build custom data reports with over 100 health and social determinants of health data indicators and explore over 28,000 current and historical data layers in the map room.

A univariate meta-regression analysis of factors affecting between-study heterogeneity.

This table contains 93984 series, with data for years 2002 - 2002 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (11 items: Canada; Prince Edward Island; Newfoundland and Labrador; Nova Scotia ...), Age group (4 items: 65 years and over;25 to 64 years;15 to 24 years; Total; 15 years and over ...), Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...), Mental health and well-being profile (89 items: Total population for the variable major depressive episode; Major depressive episode; all measured criteria are met; Major depressive episode; measured criteria not met; Major depressive episode; not stated ...), Characteristics (8 items: Number of persons; Coefficient of variation for number of persons; Low 95% confidence interval; number of persons; High 95% confidence interval; number of persons ...).