As of June 17, 2024, the most shorted stock was for, the American holographic technology services provider, MicroCloud Hologram Inc., with 66.64 percent of their total float having been shorted. This is a change from mid-January 2021, when video game retailed GameStop had an incredible 121.07 percent of their available shares in a short position. In effect this means that investors had 'borrowed' more shares (with a future promise to return them) than the total number of shares available for public trading. Owing to this behavior of professional investors, retail investors enacted a campaign to drive up the stock price of Gamestop, leading to losses of billions when investors had to repurchase the stock they had borrowed. At this time, a similar – but less effective – social media campaign was also carried out for the stock price of cinema operator AMC, and the price of silver. What is short selling? Short selling is essentially where an investor bets on a share price falling by: borrowing a number of shares selling these shares while the price is still high; purchasing the same number again once the price falls; then returning the borrowed shares at a profit. Of course, a profit will only be made if the share price does fall; should the share price rise the investor will then need to purchase the shares back at a higher price, and thus incur a loss. Short selling can lead to some very large profits in a short amount of time, with Tesla stock generating over one billion dollars in short sell profits during the first week of March 2020 alone, owing to the financial crash caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. However, owing to the short-term, opportunistic nature of short selling, these returns look less impressive when considered as net profits from short sell positions over the full year. The risks of short selling Short selling carries greater risks than traditional investments, and for this reason financial advisors often recommend against this strategy for ‘retail’ (i.e. non-professional) investors. The reason for this is that losses from short selling are potentially uncapped, whereas losses from traditional investments are limited to the initial cost. For example, if someone purchases 100 dollars of shares, the maximum they can lose is the 100 dollars the spent on those shares. However, say someone borrows 100 dollars of shares instead, betting on the price falling. If these shares are then sold for 100 dollars but the price subsequently rises, the losses could greatly exceed the initial investment should the price rise to, say, 500 dollars. The risks of short selling can be seen by looking again at Tesla, with the company causing the greatest losses over 2020 from short selling at over 40 billion U.S. dollars.

This study investigates the impact of sustainable development on the relevance of accounting information and financial activities of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). The results reveal that earnings per share and book value per share have a positive effect on market value, implying that higher earnings signal strong financial performance, thereby attracting more investor interest. Short-term and long-term debt financing have a negative effect on market value, suggesting that debt financing leads to increased financial risk. Current asset and fixed asset investments have a positive effect on market value by signaling confidence in operational performance. Dividend payouts have a positive effect on market value, demonstrating a commitment to returning value to investors, resulting in a stronger firm reputation and investor perception. However, firms that adhere to sustainable development guidelines face more complex dynamics. The results show that both earnings per share and book value per share have a negative effect on market value, suggesting that while they report high earnings per share and book value per share, these financial metrics cannot alleviate investor skepticism regarding sustainability as a cost of the firm. Short-term debt financing has a positive effect on market value because it provides a flexible and efficient way to fund sustainable investments without diluting equity or incurring long-term debt obligations, while the implications of long-term debt financing and current asset investments are insignificant. Furthermore, the significant positive effect of fixed asset investment underscores the potential long-term benefits of sustainability, despite high initial costs. Lastly, the non-significant negative impact of dividend payouts on market value suggests that the overall effect may also depend on various factors. These results support the idea of efficient market theory, which posits that investors may have negative reactions to what they perceive as financial burdens, diminishing the importance of positive financial metrics and altering market value. This study recommends that policymakers should carefully design regulations and incentives to support sustainable investments. Such approaches may include establishing specific funds, tax incentives, subsidies, and soft loans. Additionally, policymakers need to promote transparency and consistent reporting on the long-term financial benefits of sustainability, which can help reduce investor skepticism and foster a more positive market response. Finally, firms should clearly communicate their long-term sustainability efforts and benefits to investors and various stakeholders, leading to a positive interpretation of the firm’s commitment to sustainable development.

Graph and download economic data for Quarterly Financial Report: U.S. Corporations: Printing and Related Support Activities: Other Short-Term Financial Investments (QFRD210323USNO) from Q4 2000 to Q3 2024 about short-term, support activities, printing, finance, nondurable goods, investment, financial, corporate, goods, manufacturing, industry, and USA.

Estonia Lending Rate: EUR: Avg: Non Financial Corporations: Short Term: Real Estate Activities data was reported at 3.860 % pa in Jun 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.610 % pa for May 2018. Estonia Lending Rate: EUR: Avg: Non Financial Corporations: Short Term: Real Estate Activities data is updated monthly, averaging 4.775 % pa from Jul 2005 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 156 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.620 % pa in Jul 2007 and a record low of 1.430 % pa in Oct 2014. Estonia Lending Rate: EUR: Avg: Non Financial Corporations: Short Term: Real Estate Activities data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Estonia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Estonia – Table EE.M005: Lending Rate.

The net value of retail sales of money market funds in the United Kingdom (UK) fluctuated considerably between January 2020 and October 2023. The net value of retail sales of money market funds reached 938 million British pounds as of October 2023. What are money market funds? Money market funds are a category of mutual funds that invest in liquid and short-term assets. The composition of money market assets is designed to provide investors with a predictable and relatively secure return on their investment while simultaneously preserving liquidity. In addition, the increasing inflow of money market funds signifies heightened investor demand for safety and liquidity, often triggered by rising risk aversion in the face of economic uncertainty or market volatility. In March 2020, the fund flow of money market funds in the United States jumped by over 18 percent, surging from 4,030 to 4,758 billion U.S. dollars. This significant rise in money market fund flows could be attributed to the elevated economic uncertainty and market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. What do money market fund values indicate? The trajectory of the value of money market funds in a country reveals the sentiments of investors, the economic performance, and the evolution of the market. The ascending trend in these funds often indicates a flight to safety by those looking for security and liquidity, especially during times of increased market volatility or economic uncertainty. The value of money market funds in the United Kingdom remained quite stable, with a few exceptions. This indicates a general sense of security, low volatility, and a cautious approach to investing in the marketplace.