Facebook
TwitterIn 2022, 83.2 males and 69.3 females per 100,000 population in England were registered as newly diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung. Over the analyzed years, the rate of newly diagnosed cases for male individuals has seen a decrease trend. Conversely, the rate of newly diagnosed cases for females has seen a steady increase over the years. This statistic shows the rate of newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer per 100,000 population in England from 1995 to 2022, by gender.
Facebook
TwitterIt is estimated that in 2025 there will be a total of 226,650 new cases of lung and bronchus cancer in the United States. The highest number of these cases are estimated to be in the state of Florida. This statistic presents the estimated number of new lung and bronchus cancer cases in the United States in 2025, by state.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains Cancer Incidence data for Lung Cancer (All Stages^) including: Age-Adjusted Rate, Confidence Interval, Average Annual Count, and Trend field information for US States for the average 5 year span from 2016 to 2020.Data are segmented by sex (Both Sexes, Male, and Female) and age (All Ages, Ages Under 50, Ages 50 & Over, Ages Under 65, and Ages 65 & Over), with field names and aliases describing the sex and age group tabulated.For more information, visit statecancerprofiles.cancer.govData NotationsState Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.TrendRising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.‡ Incidence Trend data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.Data Source Field Key(1) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(5) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(6) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).(7) Source: SEER November 2022 submission.(8) Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.Some data are not available, see Data Not Available for combinations of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of cancer worldwide, posing significant challenges for early detection and effective treatment. To contribute to the global effort in understanding and combating this disease, we are excited to introduce our comprehensive Lung Cancer Dataset, now available on Kaggle.
This dataset is an invaluable asset in the realm of Health Care, providing a structured foundation for the development of cancer detection models. This dataset exemplifies the variety of symptoms of Lung Cancer. Each category within the dataset—'GENDER', 'AGE', 'SMOKING', 'YELLOW_FINGERS', 'ANXIETY', 'PEER_PRESSURE', 'CHRONIC_DISEASE', 'FATIGUE', 'ALLERGY', 'WHEEZING', 'ALCOHOL_CONSUMING', 'COUGHING', 'SHORTNESS_OF_BREATH', 'SWALLOWING_DIFFICULTY', 'CHEST_PAIN'—has been carefully curated to encompass a diverse range of symptoms, ensuring that the resulting models are versatile and accurate. This scientific approach not only enhances the dataset's diversity to record symptoms of lung cancer but also contributes to the broader field of AI-driven health technologies, pushing the boundaries of what health care assistants can achieve.
The Lung Cancer Dataset includes a diverse array of symptoms essential for comprehensive analysis and model development. The primary categories of data are as follows:
Age: Provides the age at diagnosis, enabling analysis of age-related incidence and outcomes. Gender: Includes information on patient gender, facilitating gender-based studies. Smoking Status: Categorized as current smoker, former smoker, or non-smoker, this data is critical for evaluating the impact of smoking on lung cancer risk and progression.
Comorbidities: Details additional health issues such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which are relevant for treatment planning and prognosis.
Vital Signs: Records of blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and other vital signs at diagnosis and during treatment.
Dataset Acquisition: Obtain the Lung Cancer Dataset. Data Exploration: Familiarize yourself with the structure and contents of the dataset, including symptoms and conclusions related to different conditions.
Data Cleaning: Remove any irrelevant or redundant entries, and ensure consistency in formatting across the dataset. Tokenization: Break down the symptoms and conclusions into tokens or individual words to facilitate analysis and model training. Normalization: Standardize the text data by converting it to lowercase and removing punctuation or special characters as needed.
Choose a Framework: Select a suitable machine learning or natural language processing framework such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, or spaCy. Model Selection: Decide on the type of model to use, such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs), transformers, or sequence-to-sequence models, based on the complexity of the dataset and the desired level of accuracy. Training Process: Train the chosen model using the preprocessed dataset, adjusting hyperparameters as necessary to optimize performance. Evaluation: Assess the performance of the trained model using appropriate metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
Integration: Integrate the trained model into a chatbot or virtual assistant application using programming languages like Python or JavaScript. User Interface Design: Design an intuitive user interface that allows users to interact with the chatbot and receive responses related to Lung Cancer. Testing: Conduct thorough testing of the deployed chatbot to ensure functionality, accuracy, and responsiveness in providing relevant result. Feedback Mechanism: Implement a feedback mechanism to gather user feedback and improve the chatbot's performance over time.
Monitoring: Continuously monitor the chatbot's performance and user interactions to identify areas for improvement. Data Updates: Periodically update the dataset with new symptoms to ensure accuracy. Model Refinement: Fine-tune the model based on user feedback and additional training data to enhance the chatbot's effectiveness and accuracy in detecting lung cancer. By following this implementation guide, developers can effectively leverage the Lung Cancer Dataset to build and deploy AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants that offer accurate predictions to users worldwide.
The extensive nature of the Lung Cancer Dataset supports a wide range of scientific and clinical applications:
Machine Learning Models: Facilitates the development of predictive algorithms for early detection, prognosis, and personalized t...
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains data about lung cancer Mortality. This database is a comprehensive collection of patient information, specifically focused on individuals diagnosed with cancer. It is designed to facilitate the analysis of various factors that may influence cancer prognosis and treatment outcomes. The database includes a range of demographic, medical, and treatment-related variables, capturing essential details about each patient's condition and history.
Key components of the database include:
Demographic Information: Basic details about the patients such as age, gender, and country of residence. This helps in understanding the distribution of cancer cases across different populations and regions.
Medical History: Information about each patient’s medical background, including family history of cancer, smoking status, Body Mass Index (BMI), cholesterol levels, and the presence of other health conditions such as hypertension, asthma, cirrhosis, and other cancers. This section is crucial for identifying potential risk factors and comorbidities.
Cancer Diagnosis: Detailed data about the cancer diagnosis itself, including the date of diagnosis and the stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis. This helps in tracking the progression and severity of the disease.
Treatment Details: Information regarding the type of treatment each patient received, the end date of the treatment, and the outcome (whether the patient survived or not). This is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment approaches.
The structure of the database allows for in-depth analysis and research, making it possible to identify patterns, correlations, and potential causal relationships between various factors and cancer outcomes. It is a valuable resource for medical researchers, epidemiologists, and healthcare providers aiming to improve cancer treatment and patient care.
id: A unique identifier for each patient in the dataset. age: The age of the patient at the time of diagnosis. gender: The gender of the patient (e.g., male, female). country: The country or region where the patient resides. diagnosis_date: The date on which the patient was diagnosed with lung cancer. cancer_stage: The stage of lung cancer at the time of diagnosis (e.g., Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, Stage IV). family_history: Indicates whether there is a family history of cancer (e.g., yes, no). smoking_status: The smoking status of the patient (e.g., current smoker, former smoker, never smoked, passive smoker). bmi: The Body Mass Index of the patient at the time of diagnosis. cholesterol_level: The cholesterol level of the patient (value). hypertension: Indicates whether the patient has hypertension (high blood pressure) (e.g., yes, no). asthma: Indicates whether the patient has asthma (e.g., yes, no). cirrhosis: Indicates whether the patient has cirrhosis of the liver (e.g., yes, no). other_cancer: Indicates whether the patient has had any other type of cancer in addition to the primary diagnosis (e.g., yes, no). treatment_type: The type of treatment the patient received (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, combined). end_treatment_date: The date on which the patient completed their cancer treatment or died. survived: Indicates whether the patient survived (e.g., yes, no).
This dataset contains artificially generated data with as close a representation of reality as possible. This data is free to use without any licence required.
Good luck Gakusei!
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Objective: While Hungary is often reported to have the highest incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer, until 2018 no nationwide epidemiology study was conducted to confirm these trends. The objective of this study was to estimate the occurrence of lung cancer in Hungary based on a retrospective review of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database.Methods: Our retrospective, longitudinal study included patients aged ≥20 years who were diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 C34) between 1 Jan 2011 and 31 Dec 2016. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated using both the 1976 and 2013 European Standard Populations (ESP).Results: Between 2011 and 2016, 6,996 – 7,158 new lung cancer cases were recorded in the NHIF database annually, and 6,045 – 6,465 all-cause deaths occurred per year. Age-adjusted incidence rates were 115.7–101.6/100,000 person-years among men (ESP 1976: 84.7–72.6), showing a mean annual change of − 2.26% (p = 0.008). Incidence rates among women increased from 48.3 to 50.3/100,000 person-years (ESP 1976: 36.9–38.0), corresponding to a mean annual change of 1.23% (p = 0.028). Age-standardized mortality rates varied between 103.8 and 97.2/100,000 person-years (ESP 1976: 72.8–69.7) in men and between 38.3 and 42.7/100,000 person-years (ESP 1976: 27.8–29.3) in women.Conclusion: Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer in Hungary were found to be high compared to Western-European countries, but lower than those reported by previous publications. The incidence of lung cancer decreased in men, while there was an increase in incidence and mortality among female lung cancer patients.
Facebook
TwitterCancer Rates for Lake County Illinois. Explanation of field attributes: Colorectal Cancer - Cancer that develops in the colon (the longest part of the large intestine) and/or the rectum (the last several inches of the large intestine). This is a rate per 100,000. Lung Cancer – Cancer that forms in tissues of the lung, usually in the cells lining air passages. This is a rate per 100,000. Breast Cancer – Cancer that forms in tissues of the breast. This is a rate per 100,000. Prostate Cancer – Cancer that forms in tissues of the prostate. This is a rate per 100,000. Urinary System Cancer – Cancer that forms in the organs of the body that produce and discharge urine. These include the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra. This is a rate per 100,000. All Cancer – All cancers including, but not limited to: colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and cancer of the urinary system. This is a rate per 100,000.
Facebook
TwitterNumber and rate of new cancer cases diagnosed annually from 1992 to the most recent diagnosis year available. Included are all invasive cancers and in situ bladder cancer with cases defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Random rounding of case counts to the nearest multiple of 5 is used to prevent inappropriate disclosure of health-related information.
Facebook
TwitterFrom 2018 to 2022, the overall death rate for lung and bronchus cancer in the Kentucky was 61 per 100,000 for males and 43.2 per 100,000 for females. This statistic presents the death rates for lung and bronchus cancer in the United States from 2018 to 2022, by state and gender.
Facebook
TwitterRate: Number of deaths due to cancer of the trachea, bronchus, and lung per 100,000 Population.
Definition: Number of deaths per 100,000 with malignant neoplasm (cancer) cancer of the trachea, bronchus, and lung as the underlying cause (ICD-10 codes: C33-C34).
Data Sources:
(1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Compressed Mortality File. CDC WONDER On-line Database accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/cmf-icd10.html
(2) Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey Department of Health
(3) Population Estimates, State Data Center, New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development
Facebook
TwitterDeath rate has been age-adjusted by the 2000 U.S. standard population. Single-year data are only available for Los Angeles County overall, Service Planning Areas, Supervisorial Districts, City of Los Angeles overall, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts.Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the US. People who smoke have the greatest risk of lung cancer, though lung cancer can also occur in people who have never smoked. Most cases are due to long-term tobacco smoking or exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. Cities and communities can take an active role in curbing tobacco use and reducing lung cancer by adopting policies to regulate tobacco retail; reducing exposure to secondhand smoke in outdoor public spaces, such as parks, restaurants, or in multi-unit housing; and improving access to tobacco cessation programs and other preventive services.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Mortality from lung cancer, directly age-standardised rate, persons, under 75 years, 2004-08 (pooled) per 100,000 European Standard population by Local Authority by local deprivation quintile. Local deprivation quintiles are calculated by ranking small areas (Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs)) within each Local Authority based on their Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 (IMD 2007) deprivation score, and then grouping the LSOAs in each Local Authority into five groups (quintiles) with approximately equal numbers of LSOAs in each. The upper local deprivation quintile (Quintile 1) corresponds with the 20% most deprived small areas within that Local Authority. The mortality rates have been directly age-standardised using the European Standard Population in order to make allowances for differences in the age structure of populations. There are inequalities in health. For example, people living in more deprived areas tend to have shorter life expectancy, and higher prevalence and mortality rates of most cancers. Lung cancer accounts for 7% of all deaths among men and in England every year and 4% of deaths among women every year. This amounts to 24% of all cancer deaths among men in England and 18% of all cancer deaths among women in England1. Reducing inequalities in premature mortality from all cancers is a national priority, as set out in the Department of Health’s Vital Signs Operating Framework 2008/09-2010/111. This indicator has been produced in order to quantify inequalities in lung cancer mortality by deprivation. This indicator has been discontinued and so there will be no further updates. Legacy unique identifier: P01406
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/
| Characteristic | Value (N = 26254) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD: 61.4± 5 Median (IQR): 60 (57-65) Range: 43-75 |
| Sex | Male: 15512 (59%) Female: 10742 (41%) |
| Race | White: 23969 (91.3%) |
| Ethnicity | Not Available |
Background: The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer.
Methods: From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. This dataset includes the low-dose CT scans from 26,254 of these subjects, as well as digitized histopathology images from 451 subjects.
Results: The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02).
Conclusions: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385).
Data Availability: A summary of the National Lung Screening Trial and its available datasets are provided on the Cancer Data Access System (CDAS). CDAS is maintained by Information Management System (IMS), contracted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as keepers and statistical analyzers of the NLST trial data. The full clinical data set from NLST is available through CDAS. Users of TCIA can download without restriction a publicly distributable subset of that clinical data, along with the CT and Histopathology images collected during the trial. (These previously were restricted.)
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Mortality from lung cancer (ICD-10 C33-C34 equivalent to ICD-9 162). To reduce deaths from lung cancer. Legacy unique identifier: P00508
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Abstract Objective: To identify the socioepidemiologic and histopathologic patterns of lung cancer patients in the Middle Euphrates region. Patients and Methods: This study analyzed medical information from lung cancer patients at the Middle Euphrates Cancer Center in Iraq from January 2018 to December 2023. Demographic information (age, gender, residency, and education level) as well as clinical details (histopathological categorization) were obtained. The inclusion criteria included all confirmed lung cancer cases, while cases with inadequate data or non-lung cancer diagnosis were omitted. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26). The data summarized using descriptive statistics, and chi-square tests used to identify correlations between categorical variables at a significance level of p < 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board. Results: A total of 1162 patients were included with mean age at diagnosis(64.47±11.45) years. Majority of patients are over 60 years (64.4%), followed by (40–60 years), 34%, and the least affected group is under 40 years (1.6%). Males account for the majority of cases (68%), while females about 32%, with male:female ratio that fluctuate around 2:1. Illiterate patients and those with low education levels represent the largest proportion accounting for about 87.9% of the study population. Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent subtype (41.7%), followed closely by Adenocarcinoma (AC) at 37%, and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC), 10.5%. Although SCC is the predominant subtype overall, AC incidence is increasing overtime (from 31.7% in 2018 to 41.4% in 2023) with predominance in females, younger and higher educated groups. While the percentage of SCLC and other less common subgroups remained relatively stable over time, there is a significant reduction in NSCLC-NOS diagnoses (from 11.1% in 2018 to 3.2% in 2023). Conclusions: In Iraq, specifically in the Middle Euphrates region, lung cancer is a major public health issue in the elder age groups. The two main subtypes, SCC and AC, are the main contributors, with obvious increment in AC cases in the recent years. The shifting trends indicate the urgent need for improved screening strategies, focused preventative initiatives, and customized treatment plans in view of changing risk profiles.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundBetter information on lung cancer occurrence in lifelong nonsmokers is needed to understand gender and racial disparities and to examine how factors other than active smoking influence risk in different time periods and geographic regions. Methods and FindingsWe pooled information on lung cancer incidence and/or death rates among self-reported never-smokers from 13 large cohort studies, representing over 630,000 and 1.8 million persons for incidence and mortality, respectively. We also abstracted population-based data for women from 22 cancer registries and ten countries in time periods and geographic regions where few women smoked. Our main findings were: (1) Men had higher death rates from lung cancer than women in all age and racial groups studied; (2) male and female incidence rates were similar when standardized across all ages 40+ y, albeit with some variation by age; (3) African Americans and Asians living in Korea and Japan (but not in the US) had higher death rates from lung cancer than individuals of European descent; (4) no temporal trends were seen when comparing incidence and death rates among US women age 40–69 y during the 1930s to contemporary populations where few women smoke, or in temporal comparisons of never-smokers in two large American Cancer Society cohorts from 1959 to 2004; and (5) lung cancer incidence rates were higher and more variable among women in East Asia than in other geographic areas with low female smoking. ConclusionsThese comprehensive analyses support claims that the death rate from lung cancer among never-smokers is higher in men than in women, and in African Americans and Asians residing in Asia than in individuals of European descent, but contradict assertions that risk is increasing or that women have a higher incidence rate than men. Further research is needed on the high and variable lung cancer rates among women in Pacific Rim countries.
Facebook
TwitterInformation about the rates of cancer deaths in each state is reported. The data shows the total rate as well as rates based on sex, age, and race. Rates are also shown for three specific kinds of cancer: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer.
| Key | List of... | Comment | Example Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| State | String | The name of a U.S. State (e.g., Virginia) | "Alabama" |
| Total.Rate | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) 214.2 | 214.2 |
| Total.Number | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (2007-2013) | 71529.0 |
| Total.Population | Float | Cumulative Population (Denominator Total_Cancer deaths total_) 2007-2013 | 33387205.0 |
| Rates.Age.< 18 | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (Under 18 Years, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 2.0 |
| Rates.Age.18-45 | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (18 to 44 Years, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 18.5 |
| Rates.Age.45-64 | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (45 to 64 Years, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 244.7 |
| Rates.Age.> 64 | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (65 Years and Over, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 1017.8 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Female.< 18 | Float | Female under 18 | 2.0 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Male.< 18 | Float | Male under 18 | 2.1 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Female.18 - 45 | Float | Female 18 - 45 | 20.1 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Male.18 - 45 | Float | Male 18 - 45 | 16.8 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Female.45 - 64 | Float | Female 45 to 64 Years | 201.0 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Male.45 - 64 | Float | Male 45 to 64 Years | 291.5 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Female.> 64 | Float | Female 65 Years and Over | 803.6 |
| Rates.Age and Sex.Male.> 64 | Float | Male 65 Years and Over | 1308.6 |
| Rates.Race.White | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (White, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 186.1 |
| Rates.Race.White non-Hispanic | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (White non-Hispanic, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 187.5 |
| Rates.Race.Black | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (Black or African American, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 216.1 |
| Rates.Race.Asian | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (Asian or Pacific Islander, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 81.3 |
| Rates.Race.Indigenous | Float | Total Cancer Deaths (American Indian or Alaska Native, Rate per 100,000 Population, 2007-2013) | 69.9 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.White | Float | Female: White | 149.2 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.White non-Hispanic | Float | Female: White non-Hispanic | 150.2 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.Black | Float | Female: Black or African American | 167.2 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.Black non-Hispanic | Float | Female: Black or African American non-Hispanic | 167.9 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.Asian | Float | Female: Asian or Pacific Islander | 84.9 |
| Rates.Race and Sex.Female.Indigenous | Float | Female: American Indian or Alaska Native | 53.8 |
| ... |
Facebook
TwitterThis table contains 600 series, with data for years 1997 - 1997 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (15 items: Canada; Prince Edward Island; Newfoundland and Labrador; Nova Scotia ...), Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...), Selected sites of cancer (ICD-9) (4 items: Colorectal cancer; Prostate cancer; Lung cancer; Female breast cancer ...), Characteristics (5 items: Relative survival rate for cancer; High 95% confidence interval; relative survival rate for cancer; Number of cases; Low 95% confidence interval; relative survival rate for cancer ...).
Facebook
TwitterBetween 2020 and 2024, the relative five-year survival rate for lung cancer was **** percent among women, and **** percent among men. Survival rates for lung cancer have significantly increased in Norway since 1984.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides valuable insights into lung cancer cases, risk factors, smoking trends, and healthcare access across 25 of the world's most populated countries. It includes 220,632 individuals with details on their age, gender, smoking history, cancer diagnosis, environmental exposure, and survival rates. The dataset is useful for medical research, predictive modeling, and policy-making to understand lung cancer patterns globally.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2022, 83.2 males and 69.3 females per 100,000 population in England were registered as newly diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung. Over the analyzed years, the rate of newly diagnosed cases for male individuals has seen a decrease trend. Conversely, the rate of newly diagnosed cases for females has seen a steady increase over the years. This statistic shows the rate of newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer per 100,000 population in England from 1995 to 2022, by gender.