3 datasets found
  1. f

    Table 1_Effect of strip width in maize/peanut intercropping on water use...

    • figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Mar 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Xianglong Sun; Yongyong Zhang; Shihang Zhang; Ning Yang; Guimin Xia; Liangshan Feng (2025). Table 1_Effect of strip width in maize/peanut intercropping on water use efficiency.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1502362.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Xianglong Sun; Yongyong Zhang; Shihang Zhang; Ning Yang; Guimin Xia; Liangshan Feng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    IntroductionMaize and peanut intercropping can optimize allocation of rainfall through crop canopies, enhancing crop resilience to drought. However, the mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear.MethodsThis study investigates the impact of strip width on rainfall redistribution to the soil in maize (MS) and peanut (PS) monoculture systems, as well as in intercropping systems with strip configurations of 2:2 (M2P2), 4:4 (M4P4), and 8:8 (M8P8).Results and discussionResults showed that maize/peanut intercropping consistently improved system water use efficiency (WUE) over the three-year experiment, with the M4P4 treatment maintaining the highest WUE throughout. Strip width significantly influenced stemflow and throughfall in maize rows, as well as throughfall in peanut rows, with maize plant height and leaf area playing key roles. Among the 17 rainfall events studied, maize rows in the M2P2, M4P4, and M8P8 treatments obtained 17.4%, 10.8%, and 5.4% more rainfall, respectively, compared to the MS. However, compared to PS, water captured by intercropped peanut rows decreased by 20.6%, 13.2%, and 7.1%, respectively. An edge effect was observed in the intercropping treatments, with stemflow in maize rows increasing by 23.7%, 17.8%, and 14.6%, and throughfall by 12.2% (M2P2), 10.6% (M4P4), and 8.6% (M8P8) compared to MS. Conversely, the M2P2, M4P4, and M8P8 treatments decreased throughfall in peanut by 20.6%, 18.0%, and 16.0%, respectively, compared with PS. Overall, our findings suggest that optimizing strip width in intercropping systems can improve both crop productivity and water management, offering insights for sustainable agricultural practices in regions with limited water resources.

  2. HAP TA Regional Training #3

    • opendata.sandag.org
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Aug 4, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SANDAG (2023). HAP TA Regional Training #3 [Dataset]. https://opendata.sandag.org/Land-and-People-/HAP-TA-Regional-Training-3/m2p2-kcfv
    Explore at:
    application/rdfxml, csv, json, xml, tsv, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    San Diego Association Of Governmentshttp://www.sandag.org/
    Authors
    SANDAG
    Description

    This is the PPT deck from our third Housing Acceleration Program Regional Training on July 25th, 2023. This training was focused on AB 2011 and SB 6 implementation for the jurisdictions.

  3. r

    Fatturato annuo

    • reportaziende.it
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Media Asset, Fatturato annuo [Dataset]. https://www.reportaziende.it/m2p2_srl_ri_01031510579
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Media Asset
    License

    https://www.reportaziende.it/termini_e_condizioni_d_uso_del_serviziohttps://www.reportaziende.it/termini_e_condizioni_d_uso_del_servizio

    Variables measured
    annualRevenue
    Description

    Fatturato per gli ultimi anni, elenco utili/perdita, costo dipendenti, soci esponenti e contatti per M2P2 S.R.L. in RIETI (RI)

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Xianglong Sun; Yongyong Zhang; Shihang Zhang; Ning Yang; Guimin Xia; Liangshan Feng (2025). Table 1_Effect of strip width in maize/peanut intercropping on water use efficiency.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1502362.s001

Table 1_Effect of strip width in maize/peanut intercropping on water use efficiency.docx

Related Article
Explore at:
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Mar 25, 2025
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Xianglong Sun; Yongyong Zhang; Shihang Zhang; Ning Yang; Guimin Xia; Liangshan Feng
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

IntroductionMaize and peanut intercropping can optimize allocation of rainfall through crop canopies, enhancing crop resilience to drought. However, the mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear.MethodsThis study investigates the impact of strip width on rainfall redistribution to the soil in maize (MS) and peanut (PS) monoculture systems, as well as in intercropping systems with strip configurations of 2:2 (M2P2), 4:4 (M4P4), and 8:8 (M8P8).Results and discussionResults showed that maize/peanut intercropping consistently improved system water use efficiency (WUE) over the three-year experiment, with the M4P4 treatment maintaining the highest WUE throughout. Strip width significantly influenced stemflow and throughfall in maize rows, as well as throughfall in peanut rows, with maize plant height and leaf area playing key roles. Among the 17 rainfall events studied, maize rows in the M2P2, M4P4, and M8P8 treatments obtained 17.4%, 10.8%, and 5.4% more rainfall, respectively, compared to the MS. However, compared to PS, water captured by intercropped peanut rows decreased by 20.6%, 13.2%, and 7.1%, respectively. An edge effect was observed in the intercropping treatments, with stemflow in maize rows increasing by 23.7%, 17.8%, and 14.6%, and throughfall by 12.2% (M2P2), 10.6% (M4P4), and 8.6% (M8P8) compared to MS. Conversely, the M2P2, M4P4, and M8P8 treatments decreased throughfall in peanut by 20.6%, 18.0%, and 16.0%, respectively, compared with PS. Overall, our findings suggest that optimizing strip width in intercropping systems can improve both crop productivity and water management, offering insights for sustainable agricultural practices in regions with limited water resources.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu