In 2021, with ** percent, improving customer experience represents the top artificial intelligence and machine learning use cases. The deployment of machine learning and artificial intelligence can advance a variety of business processes.

Newsle led the global machine learning industry in 2021 with a market share of ***** percent, followed by TensorFlow and Torch. The source indicates that machine learning software is utilized for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) that allows systems the ability to automatically or "artificially" learn and improve functions based on experience without being specifically programmed to do so.

This dataset consists of imagery, imagery footprints, associated ice seal detections and homography files associated with the KAMERA Test Flights conducted in 2019. This dataset was subset to include relevant data for detection algorithm development. This dataset is limited to data collected during flights 4, 5, 6 and 7 from our 2019 surveys.

As per Cognitive Market Research's latest published report, the Global Machine Learning market size was USD 24,345.76 million in 2021 and it is forecasted to reach USD 206,235.41 million by 2028. Machine Learning Industry's Compound Annual Growth Rate will be 42.64% from 2023 to 2030. What is Driving Machine Learning Market?

COVID-19 Impact:

Similar to other industries, the covid-19 situation has affected the machine learning industry. Despite the dire conditions and uncertain collapse, some industries have continued to grow during the pandemic. During covid 19, the machine learning market remains stable with positive growth and opportunities. The global machine learning market faces minimal impact compared to some other industries.The growth of the global machine learning market has stagnated owing to automation developments and technological advancements. Pre-owned machines and smartphones widely used for remote work are leading to positive growth of the market. Several industries have transplanted the market progress using new technologies of machine learning systems. June 2020, DeCaprio et al. Published COVID-19 pandemic risk research is still in its early stages. In the report, DeCaprio et al. mentions that it has used machine learning to build an initial vulnerability index for the coronavirus. The lab further noted that as more data and results from ongoing research become available, it will be able to see more practical applications of machine learning in predicting infection risk.

Machine Learning Market Drivers:

Growing use of the technology and automation is a major factor is expected to drive the growth of the global machine learning market. Increasing need of machine learning from the media and entertainment, automobiles, IT and telecommunications, education, and other government and non-government sectors are factors driving the growth of the global machine learning market over the forecast period. In October 2022, Bharat Electronics (BEL) announced the signing of an agreement with Meslova to develop products and services in artificial intelligence and machine learning to develop air defense (AD) systems and platforms for the armed forces. Meslova uses artificial intelligence to develop domain-specific products and applications for some of the largest governments and corporations. Increasing technology advancements to higher accuracy of systems coupled with demand of various system based on machine learning such as voice recognition systems, image recognition system and recommender systems which is expected to support the growth in the near future. Furthermore, introduction of self-driving automobiles and significant expenditures in AI is another factor expected to fuel the growth of the global market over the forecast year.

Machine Learning Market: Restraints

The lack of skilled and experienced employees in the machine learning is a major factor expected to decline growth of the target market to a certain extent. In addition, network hardware issues, delicate data security, and ethical allegations in the algorithms is expected to hamper growth of the potential market in the near future. However, the high deployment cost is another factor that could pose as a hindrance in the growth of global market.

Machine Learning Market: Opportunities

During covid 19, industries and organizations in almost all regions are using remote working and working from home. It increases the use of machines, smartphones and other technological devices. Schools, colleges, government and non-government sectors are using machines developed by AI systems. Therefore, according to the machine learning market forecast report, the technology and machine learning are in high demand and will increase in the future. Organizations and other organizational sectors are investing more in building A-based technologies to benefit the global market. These are the major machine learning market opportunities to watch during the forecast period. What is Machine Learning?

Machine learning (ML) is a subdivision of artificial intelligence (AI). It is a method of data analysis that teaches computers to learn from algorithms and data, quickly mimicking the way humans learn. The technique focuses primarily on developing a program that can access data and use it to learn for itself. Machine learning enables machines to learn directly from data, experience, and examples. Additionally, ma...

According to a survey conducted among healthcare providers in the United States in April 2021, ** percent of respondents reported that in their hospital or health systems artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning efforts were in the pilot stage and the rollout was to be decided, while a further ** percent said that it is in the early stage initiatives.

In recent years

A three-dimensional extreme gradient boosting (XGB) machine learning model was developed to predict the distribution of nitrate in groundwater across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Nitrate was predicted at a 1-square-kilometer (km) resolution for two drinking water zones, each of variable depth, one for domestic supply and one for public supply. The model used measured nitrate concentrations from 12,082 wells, and included predictor variables representing well characteristics, hydrologic conditions, soil type, geology, land use, climate, and nitrogen inputs. Predictor variables derived from empirical or numerical process-based models were also included to integrate information on controlling processes and conditions. This data release documents the model and provides the model results. The model and results are discussed in the associated journal article, Ransom and others (2021). Included in this data release are, 1) a model archive of the R project: source code, input files (including model training and hold-out data, rasters of all final predictor variables, and rasters representing domestic and public supply depth zones), and output files (two rasters of predicted nitrate concentration at the depth zones typical of domestic and public supply wells), 2) a read_me file describing the model archive and an explanation of its use, and 3) tables describing model variables, model fit statistics, and model results [these tables are also included in the Supporting Information published with the journal article Ransom and others (2021)].

According to the survey, ** percent of machine learning, data science, and artificial intelligence developers work with unstructured text data, which makes it the most popular type of data for developers. Tabular data is the second most popular type of data, with ** percent usage.

This model archive contains the input data, model code, and model outputs for machine learning models that predict daily non-tidal stream salinity (specific conductance) for a network of 459 modeled stream segments across the Delaware River Basin (DRB) from 1984-09-30 to 2021-12-31. There are a total of twelve models from combinations of two machine learning models (Random Forest and Recurrent Graph Convolution Neural Networks), two training/testing partitions (spatial and temporal), and three input attribute sets (dynamic attributes, dynamic and static attributes, and dynamic attributes and a minimum set of static attributes). In addition to the inputs and outputs for non-tidal predictions provided on the landing page, we also provide example predictions for models trained with additional tidal stream segments within the model archive (TidalExample folder), but we do not recommend our models for this use case. Model outputs contained within the model archive include performance metrics, plots of spatial and temporal errors, and Shapley (SHAP) explainable artificial intelligence plots for the best models. The results of these models provide insights into DRB stream segments with elevated salinity, and processes that drive stream salinization across the DRB, which may be used to inform salinity management. This data compilation was funded by the USGS.

On May 21st, 2021, we held the webinar "Covid-19 and AI: unexpected challenges and lessons". This short note presents its highlights.

This data set provides heat detector temperatures in a single story three-compartment structure. 1000 sets of detector temperatures are generated using CData [1]. The data set are obtained based on simulation runs with various t-squared fires. The peak heat release rate and time to peak range from approximately 50 kW to 2200 kW and from 50 s to 1400 s, respectively. A detailed description of this work can be found in Ref. [2]. [1] Tam, W.C., Fu, E.Y., Peacock, R., Reneke, P., Wang, J., Li, J. and Cleary, T., 2020. Generating synthetic sensor data to facilitate machine learning paradigm for prediction of building fire hazard. Fire Technology, pp.1-22. [2] Wang, J., Tam, W.C., Jia, Y., Peacock, R., Reneke, P., Fu, E.Y. and Cleary, T., 2021. P-Flash - A machine learning-based model for flashover prediction using recovered temperature data. Fire Safety Journal, 122, p.103341.

These images and associated binary labels were collected from collaborators across multiple universities to serve as a diverse representation of biomedical images of vessel structures, for use in the training and validation of machine learning tools for vessel segmentation. The dataset contains images from a variety of imaging modalities, at different resolutions, using difference sources of contrast and featuring different organs/ pathologies. This data was use to train, test and validated a foundational model for 3D vessel segmentation, tUbeNet, which can be found on github. The paper descripting the training and validation of the model can be found here. Filenames are structured as follows: Data - [Modality]_[species Organ]_[resolution].tif Labels - [Modality]_[species Organ]_[resolution]_labels.tif Sub-volumes of larger dataset - [Modality]_[species Organ]_subvolume[dimensions in pixels].tif Manual labelling of blood vessels was carried out using Amira (2020.2, Thermo-Fisher, UK). Training data: opticalHREM_murineLiver_2.26x2.26x1.75um.tif: A high resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM) dataset, acquired in house by staining a healthy mouse liver with Eosin B and imaged using a standard HREM protocol. NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. CT_murineTumour_20x20x20um.tif: X-ray microCT images of a microvascular cast, taken from a subcutaneous mouse model of colorectal cancer (acquired in house). NB: 25% of this image volume was withheld from training, for use as test data. RSOM_murineTumour_20x20um.tif: Raster-Scanning Optoacoustic Mesoscopy (RSOM) data from a subcutaneous tumour model (provided by Emma Brown, Bohndiek Group, University of Cambridge). The image data has undergone filtering to reduce the background ​(Brown et al., 2019)​. OCTA_humanRetina_24x24um.tif: retinal angiography data obtained using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) (provided by Dr Ranjan Rajendram, Moorfields Eye Hospital). Test data: MRI_porcineLiver_0.9x0.9x5mm.tif: T1-weighted Balanced Turbo Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data from a machine-perfused porcine liver, acquired in-house. Test Data MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_2.76x2.76x2.61um.tif: a subcutaneous colorectal tumour mouse model was imaged in house using Multi-fluorescence HREM in house, with Dylight 647 conjugated lectin staining the vasculature ​(Walsh et al., 2021)​. The image data has been processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by ​Walsh et al., 2020​. NB: A sub-volume of 480x480x640 voxels was manually labelled (MFHREM_murineTumourLectin_subvolume480x480x640.tif). MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_0.85x0.85x0.86um.tif: an MF-HREM image of the cortex of a mouse brain, stained with Dylight-647 conjugated lectin, was acquired in house ​(Walsh et al., 2021)​. The image data has been downsampled and processed using an asymmetric deconvolution algorithm described by ​Walsh et al., 2020​. NB: A sub-volume of 1000x1000x99 voxels was manually labelled. This sub-volume is provided at full resolution and without preprocessing (MFHREM_murineBrainLectin_subvol_0.57x0.57x0.86um.tif). 2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_0.2x0.46x5.2um.tif: two-photon data of mouse olfactory bulb blood vessels, labelled with sulforhodamine 101, was kindly provided by Yuxin Zhang at the Sensory Circuits and Neurotechnology Lab, the Francis Crick Institute ​(Bosch et al., 2022)​. NB: A sub-volume of 500x500x79 voxel was manually labelled (2Photon_murineOlfactoryBulbLectin_subvolume500x500x79.tif). References: ​​Bosch, C., Ackels, T., Pacureanu, A., Zhang, Y., Peddie, C. J., Berning, M., Rzepka, N., Zdora, M. C., Whiteley, I., Storm, M., Bonnin, A., Rau, C., Margrie, T., Collinson, L., & Schaefer, A. T. (2022). Functional and multiscale 3D structural investigation of brain tissue through correlative in vivo physiology, synchrotron microtomography and volume electron microscopy. Nature Communications 2022 13:1, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30199-6 ​Brown, E., Brunker, J., & Bohndiek, S. E. (2019). Photoacoustic imaging as a tool to probe the tumour microenvironment. DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1242/DMM.039636 ​Walsh, C., Holroyd, N. A., Finnerty, E., Ryan, S. G., Sweeney, P. W., Shipley, R. J., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2021). Multifluorescence High-Resolution Episcopic Microscopy for 3D Imaging of Adult Murine Organs. Advanced Photonics Research, 2(10), 2100110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADPR.202100110 ​Walsh, C., Holroyd, N., Shipley, R., & Walker-Samuel, S. (2020). Asymmetric Point Spread Function Estimation and Deconvolution for Serial-Sectioning Block-Face Imaging. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1248 CCIS, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52791-4_19 ​ 

Data ser for a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of peer-reviewed articles from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, covering the period from January 2021 to February 2025. The review investigates data-driven approaches combined with AI Maching Learning (ML) across four educational domains: learning, teaching, assessment, administration and Cross-cutting applications.

This is a real-world industrial benchmark dataset from a major medical device manufacturer for the prediction of customer escalations. The dataset contains features derived from IoT (machine log) and enterprise data including labels for escalation from a fleet of thousands of customers of high-end medical devices.

The dataset accompanies the publication "System Design for a Data-driven and Explainable Customer Sentiment Monitor" (submitted). We provide an anonymized version of data collected over a period of two years.

The dataset should fuel the research and development of new machine learning algorithms to better cope with real-world data challenges including sparse and noisy labels, and concept drifts. Additional challenges is the optimal fusion of enterprise and log based features for the prediction task. Thereby, interpretability of designed prediction models should be ensured in order to have practical relevancy.

Supporting software

Kindly use the corresponding GitHub repository (https://github.com/annguy/customer-sentiment-monitor) to design and benchmark your algorithms.

Citation and Contact

If you use this dataset please cite the following publication:

@ARTICLE{9520354,
 author={Nguyen, An and Foerstel, Stefan and Kittler, Thomas and Kurzyukov, Andrey and Schwinn, Leo and Zanca, Dario and Hipp, Tobias and Jun, Sun Da and Schrapp, Michael and Rothgang, Eva and Eskofier, Bjoern},
 journal={IEEE Access}, 
 title={System Design for a Data-Driven and Explainable Customer Sentiment Monitor Using IoT and Enterprise Data}, 
 year={2021},
 volume={9},
 number={},
 pages={117140-117152},
 doi={10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106791}}

If you would like to get in touch, please contact an.nguyen@fau.de.

Subsurface data analysis, reservoir modeling, and machine learning (ML) techniques have been applied to the Brady Hot Springs (BHS) geothermal field in Nevada, USA to further characterize the subsurface and assist with optimizing reservoir management. Hundreds of reservoir simulations have been conducted in TETRAD-G and CMG STARS to explore different injection and production fluid flow rates and allocations and to develop a training data set for ML. This process included simulating the historical injection and production since 1979 and prediction of future performance through 2040. ML networks were created and trained using TensorFlow based on multilayer perceptron, long short-term memory, and convolutional neural network architectures. These networks took as input selected flow rates, injection temperatures, and historical field operation data and produced estimates of future production temperatures. This approach was first successfully tested on a simplified single-fracture doublet system, followed by the application to the BHS reservoir. Using an initial BHS data set with 37 simulated scenarios, the trained and validated network predicted the production temperature for six production wells with the mean absolute percentage error of less than 8%. In a complementary analysis effort, the principal component analysis applied to 13 BHS geological parameters revealed that vertical fracture permeability shows the strongest correlation with fault density and fault intersection density. A new BHS reservoir model was developed considering the fault intersection density as proxy for permeability. This new reservoir model helps to explore underexploited zones in the reservoir. A data gathering plan to obtain additional subsurface data was developed; it includes temperature surveying for three idle injection wells at which the reservoir simulations indicate high bottom-hole temperatures. The collected data assist with calibrating the reservoir model. Data gathering activities are planned for the first quarter of 2021. This GDR submission includes a preprint of the paper titled "Subsurface Characterization and Machine Learning Predictions at Brady Hot Springs" presented at the 46th Stanford Geothermal Workshop (SGW) on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering from February 16-18, 2021.

In 2021, the AI and machine learning medical device market was valued at around *** billion U.S. dollars globally. By 2032, the market was forecast to increase to a value of **** billion U.S. dollars.

According to a recent survey, 56 percent of respondents state experiencing issues with security and auditability requirements when deploying machine learning and artificial intelligence in 2021. Auditability is the degree to which transaction from the originator to the approver and final disposition can be traced.

CTD, Meteo, nutrient chemistry and Aquascope camera data, used to predict Chl-a as part of Gabriel Vallat civil service project. There is a data set with daily averages and one with hourly measurements. In each dataset a single average value was calculated across the photic zone (0-8m) for each profile, and zooplankton and phytoplankton cluster abundances were estimated using machine learning classifier output of Aquascope camera data (more information about aquascope see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117524 https://doi.org/10.25678/0004BW)

GENERAL INFORMATIONThe dataset represents supporting data for the research findings of the paper accepted for AIED'21 conference: http://oro.open.ac.uk/76042/ SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATIONLinks to publications that cite or use the data: Hlosta, Martin; Christothea, Herodotou; Miriam, Fernandez and Vaclav, Bayer Impact of Predictive Learning Analytics on Course Awarding Gap of Disadvantaged students in STEM. In: 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2021, Springer.Was data derived from another source? Yes - the data was derived from the internal OU data Recommended citation for this dataset: Hlosta, Martin; Christothea, Herodotou; Miriam, Fernandez and Vaclav, Bayer Impact of Predictive Learning Analytics on Course Awarding Gap of Disadvantaged students in STEM. In: 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2021, Springer.DATA & FILE OVERVIEWThe dataset contains coefficients of a logistic and linear regression that was used to model 3 student outcomes in 3 STEM courses - 1) completion, 2) passing and 3) overall score. The results are split into four tabs1. Regression BetasBets coefficients and the Standard Error for each variable student outcome , i.e. - completion: comp_B comp_SE - passing: pass_B pass_SE - overall score: score_B score_SE 2. LogReg Marginal Effectsthe marginal effect coefficients for the two dichotomous outcomes from the previous tab (completion and passing) More information about the marginal effects: https://www.statisticshowto.com/marginal-effects/3. Reg_BAME - These are the regression coefficients reported in the in the first tab, for the same outcomes (i.e. completion/passing/overall score), but disaggregated by whether the student is identified as BAME or not. Note that the analysis does not contain the 'BAME' coefficients, because it would be constant4. Red_IMDSimilarly as for BAME (point 3), these are regression coefficients disaggregated by IMD quintiles. IMD_Missing is a special category capturing the students without any IMD, i.e. international students.Regression coefficient variablesThe variables entering the regressions can be split into three categories and the intercept(1) Student level - age - banded into age_60, age_MISSING (reference category: age_[21-24]) - gender - gender_F (reference category Gender_M) - an indicator of linked qualification - linked_qual (reference category: linked_qual =False) - declared disability - disability (reference category: disability=False) - caring responsibility carer_NO, carer_YES (reference category: carer_MISSING) - flag whether the student is new at the OU - is_new (reference category: is_new=False) - highest previous education - ed_NoFormal, ed_HE_Qual, ed_PostGrad (reference category: ed_A Level/Equivalent) - average previous score - discretised into prev_score_LOW, prev_score_MOD, prev_score_VERY_HIGH (avg.prev.score=MISSING, i.e. the student did not study any previous course) these are banded into 4 quartiles (LOW, MOD, HIGH, VERY_HIGH), independently for each course - i.e. the specific values of these thresholds vary for the courses, as they will usually have values of the average score. - number of other credits studied - banded as credits_other_[1-60], credits_other_>=61 (reference category: credits_other=0) - number of previous attempts of the course - prev_attempt_=1, prev_attempt >1 (reference category: prev_attempt_0) - IMD (Index of Multiple Deprivation) - banded into quintiles, i.e. imd_=81 imd_MISSING (reference category: imd_[41-60]) - whether the student is identified as BAME - BAME_YES (reference category: BAME_NO) - Membership in the intervention group - group_INT (reference category: group_INT=0) (2) Teacher level - no. of students the teacher is responsible for - stud_in_group - avg. student pass rate in the previous years they were teaching - tut_pr_pass_LOW, tut_pr_pass_HIGH, tut_pr_pass_VERY_HIGH, tut_pr_pass_MISSING (reference category: tut_pr_pass_MOD) - these are banded into 4 quartiles (LOW, MOD, HIGH, VERY_HIGH), independently for each course - i.e. the specific values of these thresholds vary for the courses, as they will usually have different pass rates (3) Course level - dummy variable encoded as - course_1, course_2 (reference category: course_3)(4) intercept

We present Code4ML: a Large-scale Dataset of annotated Machine Learning Code, a corpus of Python code snippets, competition summaries, and data descriptions from Kaggle.

The data is organized in a table structure. Code4ML includes several main objects: competitions information, raw code blocks collected form Kaggle and manually marked up snippets. Each table has a .csv format.

Each competition has the text description and metadata, reflecting competition and used dataset characteristics as well as evaluation metrics (competitions.csv). The corresponding datasets can be loaded using Kaggle API and data sources.

The code blocks themselves and their metadata are collected to the data frames concerning the publishing year of the initial kernels. The current version of the corpus includes two code blocks files: snippets from kernels up to the 2020 year (сode_blocks_upto_20.csv) and those from the 2021 year (сode_blocks_21.csv) with corresponding metadata. The corpus consists of 2 743 615 ML code blocks collected from 107 524 Jupyter notebooks.

Marked up code blocks have the following metadata: anonymized id, the format of the used data (for example, table or audio), the id of the semantic type, a flag for the code errors, the estimated relevance to the semantic class (from 1 to 5), the id of the parent notebook, and the name of the competition. The current version of the corpus has ~12 000 labeled snippets (markup_data_20220415.csv).

As marked up code blocks data contains the numeric id of the code block semantic type, we also provide a mapping from this number to semantic type and subclass (actual_graph_2022-06-01.csv).

The dataset can help solve various problems, including code synthesis from a prompt in natural language, code autocompletion, and semantic code classification.