About this webinar We rarely receive the research data in an appropriate form. Often data is messy. Sometimes it is incomplete. And sometimes there’s too much of it. Frequently, it has errors. This webinar targets beginners and presents a quick demonstration of using the most widespread data wrangling tool, Microsoft Excel, to sort, filter, copy, protect, transform, aggregate, summarise, and visualise research data. Webinar Topics Introduction to Microsoft Excel user interface Interpret data using sorting, filtering, and conditional formatting Summarise data using functions Analyse data using pivot tables Manipulate and visualise data Handy tips to speed up your work Licence Copyright © 2021 Intersect Australia Ltd. All rights reserved.

Question Paper Solutions of chapter Data Analysis using MS-Excel of Data Analytics Skills for Managers, 5th Semester , Bachelor in Business Administration 2020 - 2021

This page provides guidance on linking open data to a spreadsheet.

• Data Analysis Project of a Clothing Store- done by using Microsoft Excel.
• Analysis is done regarding Sales trend, according to Gender, Month, Age Group etc.
• The Analysis mainly is done using Pivot Table and Charts , with exception of Data Cleaning.
• The Data is shown collectively in in a Dashboard esque sheet named 'Vrinda Store Report'.

The Delta Neighborhood Physical Activity Study was an observational study designed to assess characteristics of neighborhood built environments associated with physical activity. It was an ancillary study to the Delta Healthy Sprouts Project and therefore included towns and neighborhoods in which Delta Healthy Sprouts participants resided. The 12 towns were located in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Data were collected via electronic surveys between August 2016 and September 2017 using the Rural Active Living Assessment (RALA) tools and the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). Scale scores for the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment and the Town-Wide Assessment were computed using the scoring algorithms provided for these tools via SAS software programming. The Street Segment Assessment and CPAT do not have associated scoring algorithms and therefore no scores are provided for them. Because the towns were not randomly selected and the sample size is small, the data may not be generalizable to all rural towns in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Dataset one contains data collected with the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment (PPA) tool. Dataset two contains data collected with the RALA Town-Wide Assessment (TWA) tool. Dataset three contains data collected with the RALA Street Segment Assessment (SSA) tool. Dataset four contains data collected with the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). [Note : title changed 9/4/2020 to reflect study name] Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA PPA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset one collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA TWA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset two collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA SSA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset three collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT Data Dictionary. File Name: CPAT Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset four collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA. File Name: RALA PPA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA. File Name: RALA TWA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA. File Name: RALA SSA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT. File Name: CPAT Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: DataDictionary_RALA_PPA_SSA_TWA_CPAT.csvResource Description: This is a combined data dictionary from each of the 4 dataset files in this set.

A messy data for demonstrating "how to clean data using spreadsheet". This dataset was intentionally formatted to be messy, for the purpose of demonstration. It was collated from here - https://openafrica.net/dataset/historic-and-projected-rainfall-and-runoff-for-4-lake-victoria-sub-regions

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Excel. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Excel by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Excel.

Key observations

The largest age group in Excel, AL was for the group of age 5 to 9 years years with a population of 77 (15.28%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Excel, AL was the 85 years and over years with a population of 2 (0.40%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Excel is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Excel total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Students use small mammal data from the National Ecological Observatory Network to understand necessary steps of data management from data collection to data analysis by re-organising excel sheets in an R-compatible format and doing basic analysis in R

Vrinda Store: Interactive Ms Excel dashboardVrinda Store: Interactive Ms Excel dashboard Feb 2024 - Mar 2024Feb 2024 - Mar 2024 The owner of Vrinda store wants to create an annual sales report for 2022. So that their employees can understand their customers and grow more sales further. Questions asked by Owner of Vrinda store are as follows:- 1) Compare the sales and orders using single chart. 2) Which month got the highest sales and orders? 3) Who purchased more - women per men in 2022? 4) What are different order status in 2022?

And some other questions related to business. The owner of Vrinda store wanted a visual story of their data. Which can depict all the real time progress and sales insight of the store. This project is a Ms Excel dashboard which presents an interactive visual story to help the Owner and employees in increasing their sales. Task performed : Data cleaning, Data processing, Data analysis, Data visualization, Report. Tool used : Ms Excel The owner of Vrinda store wants to create an annual sales report for 2022. So that their employees can understand their customers and grow more sales further. Questions asked by Owner of Vrinda store are as follows:- 1) Compare the sales and orders using single chart. 2) Which month got the highest sales and orders? 3) Who purchased more - women per men in 2022? 4) What are different order status in 2022? And some other questions related to business. The owner of Vrinda store wanted a visual story of their data. Which can depict all the real time progress and sales insight of the store. This project is a Ms Excel dashboard which presents an interactive visual story to help the Owner and employees in increasing their sales. Task performed : Data cleaning, Data processing, Data analysis, Data visualization, Report. Tool used : Ms Excel Skills: Data Analysis · Data Analytics · ms excel · Pivot Tables

This dataset is about book subjects. It has 3 rows and is filtered where the books is Business statistics using Excel & SPSS. It features 10 columns including number of authors, number of books, earliest publication date, and latest publication date.

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

Spreadsheets targeted at the analysis of GHS safety fingerprints.AbstractOver a 20-year period, the UN developed the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) to address international variation in chemical safety information standards. By 2014, the GHS became widely accepted internationally and has become the cornerstone of OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard. Despite this progress, today we observe that there are inconsistent results when different sources apply the GHS to specific chemicals, in terms of the GHS pictograms, hazard statements, precautionary statements, and signal words assigned to those chemicals. In order to assess the magnitude of this problem, this research uses an extension of the “chemical fingerprints” used in 2D chemical structure similarity analysis to GHS classifications. By generating a chemical safety fingerprint, the consistency of the GHS information for specific chemicals can be assessed. The problem is the sources for GHS information can differ. For example, the SDS for sodium hydroxide pellets found on Fisher Scientific’s website displays two pictograms, while the GHS information for sodium hydroxide pellets on Sigma Aldrich’s website has only one pictogram. A chemical information tool, which identifies such discrepancies within a specific chemical inventory, can assist in maintaining the quality of the safety information needed to support safe work in the laboratory. The tools for this analysis will be scaled to the size of a moderate large research lab or small chemistry department as a whole (between 1000 and 3000 chemical entities) so that labelling expectations within these universes can be established as consistently as possible.Most chemists are familiar with programs such as excel and google sheets which are spreadsheet programs that are used by many chemists daily. Though a monadal programming approach with these tools, the analysis of GHS information can be made possible for non-programmers. This monadal approach employs single spreadsheet functions to analyze the data collected rather than long programs, which can be difficult to debug and maintain. Another advantage of this approach is that the single monadal functions can be mixed and matched to meet new goals as information needs about the chemical inventory evolve over time. These monadal functions will be used to converts GHS information into binary strings of data called “bitstrings”. This approach is also used when comparing chemical structures. The binary approach make data analysis more manageable, as GHS information comes in a variety of formats such as pictures or alphanumeric strings which are difficult to compare on their face. Bitstrings generated using the GHS information can be compared using an operator such as the tanimoto coefficent to yield values from 0 for strings that have no similarity to 1 for strings that are the same. Once a particular set of information is analyzed the hope is the same techniques could be extended to more information. For example, if GHS hazard statements are analyzed through a spreadsheet approach the same techniques with minor modifications could be used to tackle more GHS information such as pictograms.Intellectual Merit. This research indicates that the use of the cheminformatic technique of structural fingerprints can be used to create safety fingerprints. Structural fingerprints are binary bit strings that are obtained from the non-numeric entity of 2D structure. This structural fingerprint allows comparison of 2D structure through the use of the tanimoto coefficient. The use of this structural fingerprint can be extended to safety fingerprints, which can be created by converting a non-numeric entity such as GHS information into a binary bit string and comparing data through the use of the tanimoto coefficient.Broader Impact. Extension of this research can be applied to many aspects of GHS information. This research focused on comparing GHS hazard statements, but could be further applied to other bits of GHS information such as pictograms and GHS precautionary statements. Another facet of this research is allowing the chemist who uses the data to be able to compare large dataset using spreadsheet programs such as excel and not need a large programming background. Development of this technique will also benefit the Chemical Health and Safety community and Chemical Information communities by better defining the quality of GHS information available and providing a scalable and transferable tool to manipulate this information to meet a variety of other organizational needs.

📊 Instagram Reach Analysis | تحليل الوصول في إنستغرام

An exploratory data analysis project using Excel to understand what influences Instagram post reach and engagement.
مشروع تحليل استكشافي لفهم العوامل المؤثرة في وصول منشورات إنستغرام وتفاعل المستخدمين، باستخدام Excel.

📁 Project Description | وصف المشروع

This project uses an Instagram dataset imported from Kaggle to explore how different factors like hashtags, saves, shares, and caption length influence impressions and engagement.
يستخدم هذا المشروع بيانات من إنستغرام تم استيرادها من منصة Kaggle لتحليل كيف تؤثر عوامل مثل الهاشتاقات، الحفظ، المشاركة، وطول التسمية التوضيحية في عدد مرات الظهور والتفاعل.

🛠️ Tools Used | الأدوات المستخدمة

• Microsoft Excel
• Pivot Tables
• TRIM, WRAP, and other Excel formulas
• مايكروسوفت إكسل
• الجداول المحورية
• دوال مثل TRIM و WRAP وغيرها في Excel

🧹 Data Cleaning | تنظيف البيانات

• Removed unnecessary spaces using TRIM
• Removed 17 duplicate rows → 103 unique rows remained

• Standardized formatting: freeze top row, wrap text, center align

• إزالة المسافات غير الضرورية باستخدام TRIM

• حذف 17 صفًا مكررًا → تبقى 103 صفوف فريدة

• تنسيق موحد: تثبيت الصف الأول، لف النص، وتوسيط المحتوى

🔍 Key Analysis Highlights | أبرز نتائج التحليل

1. Impressions by Source | مرات الظهور حسب المصدر

• Highest reach: Home > Hashtags > Explore > Other
• Some totals exceed 100% due to overlapping

2. Engagement Insights | رؤى حول التفاعل

• Saves strongly correlate with higher impressions
• Caption length is inversely related to likes
• Shares have weak correlation with impressions

3. Hashtag Patterns | تحليل الهاشتاقات

• Most used: #Thecleverprogrammer, #Amankharwal, #Python
• Repeating hashtags does not guarantee higher reach

✅ Conclusion | الخلاصة

Shorter captions and higher save counts contribute more to reach than repeated hashtags. Profile visits are often linked to new followers.
العناوين القصيرة وعدد الحفظات تلعب دورًا أكبر في الوصول من تكرار الهاشتاقات. كما أن زيارات الملف الشخصي ترتبط غالبًا بزيادة المتابعين.

👩‍💻 Author | المؤلفة

Raghad's LinkedIn

🧠 Inspiration | الإلهام

Inspired by content from TheCleverProgrammer, Aman Kharwal, and Kaggle datasets.
استُلهم المشروع من محتوى TheCleverProgrammer وأمان خروال، وبيانات من Kaggle.

💬 Feedback | الملاحظات

Feel free to open an issue or share suggestions!
يسعدنا تلقي ملاحظاتكم واقتراحاتكم عبر صفحة المشروع.

Sheet 1 (Raw-Data): The raw data of the study is provided, presenting the tagging results for the used measures described in the paper. For each subject, it includes multiple columns: A. a sequential student ID B an ID that defines a random group label and the notation C. the used notation: user Story or use Cases D. the case they were assigned to: IFA, Sim, or Hos E. the subject's exam grade (total points out of 100). Empty cells mean that the subject did not take the first exam F. a categorical representation of the grade L/M/H, where H is greater or equal to 80, M is between 65 included and 80 excluded, L otherwise G. the total number of classes in the student's conceptual model H. the total number of relationships in the student's conceptual model I. the total number of classes in the expert's conceptual model J. the total number of relationships in the expert's conceptual model K-O. the total number of encountered situations of alignment, wrong representation, system-oriented, omitted, missing (see tagging scheme below) P. the researchers' judgement on how well the derivation process explanation was explained by the student: well explained (a systematic mapping that can be easily reproduced), partially explained (vague indication of the mapping ), or not present.

Tagging scheme:
Aligned (AL) - A concept is represented as a class in both models, either

with the same name or using synonyms or clearly linkable names; Wrongly represented (WR) - A class in the domain expert model is incorrectly represented in the student model, either (i) via an attribute, method, or relationship rather than class, or (ii) using a generic term (e.g., user'' instead ofurban planner''); System-oriented (SO) - A class in CM-Stud that denotes a technical implementation aspect, e.g., access control. Classes that represent legacy system or the system under design (portal, simulator) are legitimate; Omitted (OM) - A class in CM-Expert that does not appear in any way in CM-Stud; Missing (MI) - A class in CM-Stud that does not appear in any way in CM-Expert.

All the calculations and information provided in the following sheets

originate from that raw data.

Sheet 2 (Descriptive-Stats): Shows a summary of statistics from the data collection,

including the number of subjects per case, per notation, per process derivation rigor category, and per exam grade category.

Sheet 3 (Size-Ratio):

The number of classes within the student model divided by the number of classes within the expert model is calculated (describing the size ratio). We provide box plots to allow a visual comparison of the shape of the distribution, its central value, and its variability for each group (by case, notation, process, and exam grade) . The primary focus in this study is on the number of classes. However, we also provided the size ratio for the number of relationships between student and expert model.

Sheet 4 (Overall):

Provides an overview of all subjects regarding the encountered situations, completeness, and correctness, respectively. Correctness is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that is fully aligned with the classes in the corresponding expert model. It is calculated by dividing the number of aligned concepts (AL) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), omitted concepts (OM), system-oriented concepts (SO), and wrong representations (WR). Completeness on the other hand, is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that are correctly or incorrectly represented over the number of classes in the expert model. Completeness is calculated by dividing the sum of aligned concepts (AL) and wrong representations (WR) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), wrong representations (WR) and omitted concepts (OM). The overview is complemented with general diverging stacked bar charts that illustrate correctness and completeness.

For sheet 4 as well as for the following four sheets, diverging stacked bar

charts are provided to visualize the effect of each of the independent and mediated variables. The charts are based on the relative numbers of encountered situations for each student. In addition, a "Buffer" is calculated witch solely serves the purpose of constructing the diverging stacked bar charts in Excel. Finally, at the bottom of each sheet, the significance (T-test) and effect size (Hedges' g) for both completeness and correctness are provided. Hedges' g was calculated with an online tool: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. The independent and moderating variables can be found as follows:

Sheet 5 (By-Notation):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by notation - UC, US.

Sheet 6 (By-Case):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by case - SIM, HOS, IFA.

Sheet 7 (By-Process):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by how well the derivation process is explained - well explained, partially explained, not present.

Sheet 8 (By-Grade):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by the exam grades, converted to categorical values High, Low , and Medium.

The dataset for the article "The current utilization status of wearable devices in clinical research".Analyses were performed by utilizing the JMP Pro 16.10, Microsoft Excel for Mac version 16 (Microsoft).The file extension "jrp" is a file of the statistical analysis software JMP, which contains both the analysis code and the data set.In case JMP is not available, a "csv" file as a data set and JMP script, the analysis code, are prepared in "rtf" format.The "xlsx" file is a Microsoft Excel file that contains the data set and the data plotted or tabulated using Microsoft Excel functions.Supplementary Figure 1. NCT number duplication frequencyIncludes Excel file used to create the figure (Supplemental Figure 1).・Sfig1_NCT number duplication frequency.xlsxSupplementary Figure 2-5　Simple and annual time series aggregationIncludes Excel file, JMP repo file, csv dataset of JMP repo file and JMP scripts used to create the figure (Supplementary Figures 2-5).・Sfig2-5 Annual time series aggregation.xlsx・Sfig2 Study Type.jrp・Sfig4device type.jrp・Sfig3 Interventions Type.jrp・Sfig5Conditions type.jrp・Sfig2, 3 ,5_database.csv・Sfig2_JMP script_Study type.rtf・Sfig3_JMP script Interventions type.rtf・Sfig5_JMP script Conditions type.rtf・Sfig4_dataset.csv・Sfig4_JMP script_device type.rtfSupplementary Figures 6-11 Mosaic diagram of intervention by conditionSupplementary tables 4-9 Analysis of contingency table for intervention by condition JMP repot files used to create the figures(Supplementary Figures 6-11 ) and tables(Supplementary Tablea 4-9) , including the csv dataset of JMP repot files and JMP scripts.・Sfig6-11 Stable4-9 Intervention devicetype_conditions.jrp・Sfig6-11_Stable4-9_dataset.csv・Sfig6-11_Stable4-9_JMP script.rtfSupplementary Figure 12. Distribution of enrollmentIncludes Excel file, JMP repo file, csv dataset of JMP repo file and JMP scripts used to create the figure (Supplementary Figures 12).・Sfig12_Distribution of enrollment.jrp・Sfig12_Distribution of enrollment.csv・Sfig12_JMP script.rtf

Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.

The excelforms extension for CKAN provides a mechanism for users to input data into Table Designer tables using Excel-based forms, enhancing data entry efficiency. This extension focuses on streamlining the process of adding data rows to tables within CKAN's Table Designer. A key component of the functionality is the ability to import multiple rows in a single operation, which significant reduces overhead associated with entering multiple data points. Key Features: Excel-Based Forms: Users can enter data using familiar Excel spreadsheets, leveraging their existing skills and software. Table Designer Integration: Designed to work seamlessly with CKAN's Table Designer, extending its functionality to include Excel-based data entry. Multiple Row Import: Supports importing multiple rows of data at once, improving data entry efficiency, especially when dealing with large datasets. Data mapping: Simplifies the process of aligning excel column headers to their corresponding data fields in tables. Improved Data Entry Speed: Provides an alternative to manual data entry, resulting in faster population and easier updates. Technical Integration: The excelforms extension integrates with CKAN by introducing new functionalities and workflows around the Table Designer plugin. The installation instructions specify that this plugin to be added before the tabledesigner plugin. Benefits & Impact: By enabling Excel-based data entry, the excelforms extension improves the user experience for those familiar with spreadsheet software. The ability to import multiple rows simultaneously significantly reduces the time and effort required to populate tables, particularly when dealing with large amounts of data. The impact is better data accessibility through the streamlining of data population workflows.

This data set contains the results presented in the paper "Custom Multi-Cache Architectures for Heap-Manipulating Programs", published in the IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (TCAD) in 2016.

The data set consists of two parts, a Microsoft Excel file ('FPGA_implementation_results.xlsx') and a Matlab script ('plot_cache_performance.m', in combination with measurement results in an ascii file).

The Excel file contains - the FPGA resource utilisation, - execution time measurements, - hit rate measurement of the multi-cache system, - and power measurements

of different FPGA designs with different on-chip cache configurations. The resource utilisation is split into FPGA slices, LUTs, FlipFlops, DSP slices and block RAMs. Results in this file can be found in Table I-IV in the paper. Please refer to the paper for more information or email f.winterstein12@imperial.ac.uk.

The Matlab script loads a data file ('cache_performance_N16384_L1') containing the hit rate measurements for different cache sizes of two direct-mapped cache with 64bit line width. The script produces a 3D 'skyscraper' plot, i.e. a grid of coloured bars. Each bar corresponds to the hit rate measured at the particular cache size configuration. The plot is saved in the file 'surf.pdf'. The script was used to produce Figure 4 of the paper. Please refer to the paper for more information or email f.winterstein12@imperial.ac.uk.

In addition to this description, we include an author copy of the paper. Note that this is not the official version of the paper. Please cite the original IEEE TCAD article if you use the data.

Abstract

The documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.

The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.

As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.

Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.

For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).

For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

Response rate

Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.

For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.

For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.

For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.

Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.

This excel contains results from the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay and Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org), Chapter 4: "Population." The methods for analyzing population were developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency ORD Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division in collaboration with the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program and other partners. Population rasters were generated using the USGS dasymetric mapping tool (see http://geography.wr.usgs.gov/science/dasymetric/index.htm) which uses land use data to distribute population data more accurately than simply within a census mapping unit. The 1990, 2000, and 2010 10m cell population density rasters were produced using Rhode Island state land use data, Massachusetts state land use, Connecticut NLCD land use data, and U.S. Census data. To generate a population estimate (number of persons) for any given area within the boundaries of this raster, NBEP used the the Zonal Statistics as Table tool to sum the 10m cell density values within a given zone dataset (e.g., watershed polygon layer). Results presented include population estimates (1990, 2000, 2010) as well as calculation of percent change (1990-2000;2000-2010;1990-2010).