Map developed by Jefferson County ITS GIS. Using the most current version of the Municipal Boundaries - these do change regularly. This map is made available to the public - there is a disclaimer statement in the marginalia.

This map service is provided by NC Department of Transportation and represents Municipal Boundaries defined through the Powell Bill 2023.This data was created to assist governmental agencies and others in making resource management decisions through use of a Geographic Information System. Municipal boundaries are recognized as a base cartographic layer for location analysis. The data are current for fiscal year 2023.These Municipal Boundaries data are based on the Powell Bill Program maps for the 2023 fiscal year. Municipalities in North Carolina that participate in the Powell Bill Program are required to submit to NCDOT on a regular basis. These data include incorporated municipalities in North Carolina that participate in the Powell Bill Program. Boundaries of municipalities which do not participate in the Powell Bill Program are also included in this data. Sources for the boundaries vary in scale and format as provided by the Municipalities.Additional metadata: GIS Data Layers (ncdot.gov)

Contains 2 datasets: * lower and single tier municipalities * upper tier municipalities and districts.

Cook County GIS Department map of municipal boundaries in Cook Cook County, Illinois in PDF format. Includes major streets, waterbodies, rail, Cook County Forest Preserve, and municipal boundaries.

Created and managed by the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) at the State of Colorado, this data shows all the local municipalities within the state. Attribution includes information regarding the municipality name, description, order number, etc.For more information on municipalities in the State of Colorado, visit the DOLA website here.

Publication Date: May 2025.

This political boundary layer is the most accurate representing the city and town boundaries in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.This datalayer has been created from latitude and longitude coordinates found in the 68-volume Harbor and Lands Commission Town Boundary Atlas. This Atlas series, and updates since it was published, describes the legal boundary for each of the 351 municipalities in Massachusetts.
These coordinates were recorded from surveys of the location of each boundary marker around the periphery of each community. Each survey was tied into higher order monumented survey control points. The Atlases also include detailed descriptions of each community's boundary and location maps for each of the original boundary marker locations. The original surveys were conducted in the 1890s. The Atlas series was published in the early 1900s and has since been updated by the Survey Section of the Massachusetts Highway Department with changes as they are approved by the legislature.MassGIS staff collaborated closely with staff from the Survey Section during the development of this data layer. MassGIS staff keyed the coordinates into a database; that data entry was double-checked by staff from the Survey Section. Staff from the Survey Section then converted the latitude/longitude coordinates to the NAD83 datum and also created a version of the coordinates in state plane coordinates with units of meters. MassGIS used the state plane coordinates to "generate" points in ArcGIS. Boundary arcs from the existing USGS-derived municipal boundary data layer were then snapped to the survey-derived points. The differences between the municipal boundary arcs digitized from those on the USGS quads and those created by snapping to the survey-derived coordinates are typically plus or minus 12 feet, although these differences are sometimes less and sometimes more. Some municipal boundary arcs (about 15% of the total) follow the edge of a road or rail right-of-way or a stream or river channel. In these cases, the new boundary arcs were "heads up" digitized based on features visible on the statewide 1:5,000 color orthos from imagery flown in 2001. For communities with a coastal boundary, MassGIS collaborated with the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority and the Department of Environmental Protection to complete a 1:12,000 scale coastline.The boundaries are included in Esri's World Topographic Map through participation in its Community Maps program.City/Town names' labels are included in this service.(This service was published from a map document using the Web Mercator projection for the data frame.)For full metadata please see https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgis-data-municipalities

This city boundary shapefile was extracted from Esri Data and Maps for ArcGIS 2014 - U.S. Populated Place Areas. This shapefile can be joined to 500 Cities city-level Data (GIS Friendly Format) in a geographic information system (GIS) to make city-level maps.

The CT Municipalities layer consists of individual polygons representing each of the 169 municipalities that make up the state of Connecticut. This feature class is based on the Towns layer originally created by CTDEEP from USGS maps. The towns from the CTDEEP data were dissolved to create 169 records (one for each town). Fields were added and deleted to create a generic schema.The CT Municipalities feature class was created in (municipality) alphabetical order. Fields were added to identify the municipality number and the CTDOT Municipality number, which differ from each other in some cases. In 1947 the town of Saybrook officially changed its name to Deep River. Other State agencies and municipalities changed their numbering systems to reflect this name change, however, most of what is now CTDOT kept their existing numbering system. This is why the CTDOT town number for Deep River is 122, the number formerly assigned to Saybrook.The square miles associated with each town are for their interior land mass area. Coastal communities have boundaries that extend into Long Island Sound. These town boundary extensions into Long Island Sound are not included in the square miles field.CTDOT has created and will maintain a cartographic rendering of the geometric shape of Municipal boundaries. Official Town and City designations as incorporated areas consisting of an authorized governing body are managed by CT's Office of Policy and Management (OPM).CTDOT has undertaken a good faith effort to represent the boundaries cartographically in a fair and equitable fashion, from the best available data compiled from existing state, regional, and local resources including - existing historical cartographic renderings of the boundary locations, supplemental survey information, and map submissions. Corrections can be submitted to the CTDOT for incorporation and correction where applicable.Attribution was assigned to designations managed by a variety of entities that strictly follow Municipal boundaries and additional designations will be added as requested by State, regional, and local partners.

Classification of municipalities according to the maps of the PDPFCI of the department of Aveyron. — "map 4: Area by commune of classes of strong to very strong hazard” Field: Map4_S_a 1 = 0-120 2= 120-290 3= 290-680 4= 680-1 310 5=1 310-3 320 6= 3 320-9 680 — "map 5: Exposure of current human issues to the hazard (Surfaces per commune located less than 100 m from the current building and in strong to very strong)” Field: Map5_S_H 1 = 0-15 2 = 15-35 3 = 35-70 4 = 70-129 5 = 129-264 6 = 264-714 — "map 6: Exposure of future human issues to the hazard (Surfaces per commune of future human issues located less than 100 m from the strong to very strong hazard)” Field: Map6_S_H 1 = 0 2 = 1-5 3 = 5-10 4 = 10-20 5 = 20-50 6 = 50-213 ‘Map 7: Forest risk per municipality (Surface per municipality with strong or very strong forest risk)” Field: Carte7_S_P 1 = 0-90 2 = 90-220 3 = 220-510 4 = 510-1 000 5 = 1 000-3 000 6 = 3 000-6 000 — 'map 8: Environmental risk per municipality (Surface per municipality with strong or very strong environmental risk)” Field: Map8_S_E 1 = 0-90 2 = 90-280 3 = 280-610 4 = 610-1 330 5 = 1 330-3 510 6 = 3 510-8 590 — 'map 9: Summary of risk by municipality’ Field: Map9_Sen 1 = 1-140 2 = 140-380 3 = 380-850 4 = 850-1 490 5 = 1 490-3 320 6 = 3 320-8 960

This is a map of Prince George's County Municipal boundaries. This map is updated when changes are needed.

PDF. A map of municipal boundaries in St. Louis County, Missouri as of July 2018. Map scale is 1:62500. Link to metadata.

The maps contain municipal boundaries, municipality name and municipality number. The data is distributed as JPEG, EMF, PPT and AI (Adobe Illustrator file).

Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) maps annexations from municipalities. This dataset is created and maintained by the Maryland Department of Planning. These boundaries are not intended to serve as a legal description. Fields:Municipality Name: Name of Municipality located in Maryland.Jurisdiction Code – Four letter county code: ALLE (Allegany), ANNE (Anne Arundel), BACI (Baltimore City), BACO (Baltimore County), CALV (Calvert), CARO (Caroline), CARR (Carroll), CECI (Cecil), CHAR (Charles), DORC (Dorchester), FRED (Frederick), GARR (Garrett), HARF (Harford), HOWA (Howard), KENT (Kent), MONT (Montgomery), PRIN (Prince George’s) QUEE (Queen Anne’s), SOME (Somerset), STMA (St. Mary’s), TALB (Talbot), WASH (Washington), WICO (Wicomico), WORC (Worcester). Last updated: 9/5/2024This is an MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Boundaries/MD_PoliticalBoundaries/FeatureServer/2

Municipal map replaced by a PLU from 25/03/2021. The Urban Planning Code defines two types of areas for municipal maps: construction sectors and inconstructible sectors. There are, however, special cases in which graphical documents: — may define areas reserved for industrial or craft activities, in particular those incompatible with the neighbourhood of inhabited areas; — define, where appropriate, areas in which the reconstruction of a building destroyed by a disaster is not permitted; — indicate areas where the facilities necessary for public facilities, for agricultural or forestry operations and for the development of natural resources are not covered by the principle of inconstructibility resulting from classification. The areas of the communal map do not always cover the entire communal territory. The areas of the municipality not covered by a sector are represented by an object in order to cover the whole municipality.

PennDOT - Pennsylvania Municipality boundaries Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:vector digital data Publication_Information: Publication_Place:Harrisburg, PA Publisher:Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Online_Linkage: http://www.pasda.psu.edu Originator:Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Research, Cartographic Information Division Publication_Date:202106

Abstract: Boundaries of municipalities within Pennsylvania as delineated for the PennDOT Type 10 general highway maps. Additional information comes from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Municipal Services. This layer contains all classifications of municipality including first and second class townships, boroughs, cities and the town. The shape file reflects a name change from Osborne borough to Glen Osborne borough in Allegheny county and a name change from Abington Township to Waverly Township in Lackawanna county. The shape file also reflects various municipal boundary line tweaks that have occurred since the 2011_01 update. Purpose: Public information and support for transportation planning, design and development. Supplemental_Information: This data is intended for use at 1:24,000 or smaller scale. This layer supercedes and replaces previous versions of padot-borough, padot-city-town, and padot-township.

The user shall indemnify, save harmless, and, if requested, defend the COMMONWEALTH, their officers, agents, and employees from and against any suits, claims, or actions for injury, death, or property damage arising out of the use of or any defect in the FILES or any accompanying documentation.

The COMMONWEALTH excludes any and all implied warranties, including warranties or merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.

The COMMONWEALTH makes no warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the FILES or accompanying documentation, including its quality, performance, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose. The FILES and documentation are provided "as is" and the USER assumes the entire risk as to its quality and performance.

The COMMONWEALTH will not be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use or inability to use the FILES or any accompanying documentation.

The USER is granted permission to translate and add value to the FILES for the use of the FILES on its computer hardware; provided, however, that the USER annually notify the UNIVERSITY / COMMONWEALTH of any customizing or value-adding work done.

Any customized or value added versions of the files will contain the following disclaimer:

THIS IS NOT A PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVED FILE. THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RETAINS THE MASTER FILES.

THE USER AGREES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MAY NOT FURTHER DISTRIBUTE THE FILES TO A THIRD PARTY.

Geospatial data about Onondaga County, New York Municipalities. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

This layer identifies corporate boundaries for all 43 municipal jurisdictions in Westchester County. Coverage originally obtained from New York State Office for Real Property Services (ORPS), and has been substantially modified to better align with current municipal tax parcel boundaries (WCparcels) based on a compilation of 2012 municipal tax parcel datasets. As all of Westchester's town's and cities compile their tax parcel databases independent of one another, there are situations were the tax parcels do not line up at the municipal borders, often resulting in gaps or overlaps of tax parcels at the border areas. This update sought to re-align boundaries to best follow the municipal boundaries as defined by the tax parcels, and often involved making the best possible spatial compromise where there were gaps or overlaps in tax map jurisdictions. It also reflects the 2011 municipal boundary change that resluted from the annexation of a tax parcel from the Town of Mount Pleasant to the Town of New Castle.

description: Cities, Towns and Villages dataset current as of 2007. Chattahoochee-Flint Region Municipalities Map.; abstract: Cities, Towns and Villages dataset current as of 2007. Chattahoochee-Flint Region Municipalities Map.

This database represents the municipal boundaries in the Maritime Rance in accordance with the interdepartmental decree Ille-et-Vilaine/Cotes d’Armor of 17 June 2003 concerning the delimitation of the territory of the municipalities on the public maritime domain and its annexed maps.