This North American Environmental Atlas data are standardized geospatial data sets at 1:10,000,000 scale. A variety of basic data layers (e.g. roads, railroads, populated places, political boundaries, hydrography, bathymetry, sea ice and glaciers) have been integrated so that their relative positions are correct. This collection of data sets forms a base with which other North American thematic data may be integrated. Any data outside of Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America included in the North American Environmental Atlas data sets is strictly to complete the context of the data.The North American Environmental Atlas – Lakes and Rivers dataset displays the coastline, linear hydrographic features (major rivers, streams, and canals), and area hydrographic features (major lakes and reservoirs) of North America at a reference spatial scale of 1:1,000,000.This map offers a seamless integration of hydrographic features derived from cartographic products generated by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), United States Geological Survey (USGS), National Institute of Statistics and Geography, (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía-Inegi), National Water Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua-Conagua).This current version of the North America Lakes and Rivers dataset supersedes the version published by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation in 2011.Files Download

This layer is sourced from maps.bts.dot.gov.

THIS MAP IS NOT AUTHORITATIVE. SEE TERMS OF USE BELOW.This web map was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management and is featured in the U.S. Great Lakes Collaborative Benthic Habitat Mapping Common Operating Dashboard in support of the Collaborative Benthic Habitat Mapping in the Nearshore Waters of the Great Lakes Basin Project. This multi-year, multi-agency project is funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) and focuses on new bathymetric data (airborne lidar and vessel based sonar) acquisition, validation, and benthic habitat characterization mapping of the nearshore waters (0-80 meters) in the U.S. Great Lakes. This project also contributes to the regional Lakebed 2030 campaign, which aims to have high-density bathymetric data available for the entirety of the Great Lakes by 2030. This web map contains data layers reflecting the current status of bathy data coverage in the nearshore (0-80 meters) of the U.S. Great Lakes, including acquisition (lidar and multibeam sonar), ground-truthing/validation, and benthic habitat mapping and characterization. Acquisition layers include coverage areas that have been acquired and are available for public use (green) as well as those that have been acquired, but are not yet available or are still in progress (orange). The nearshore water depth layers (0-25 and 25-80 meters) were created using the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts. The 0 to 25 meter nearshore water depth layer represents areas where bathymetric lidar data acquisition could ideally be conducted, depending on water condition and turbidity. The 25 to 80 meter layer shows locations where acoustic data acquisition can occur. See below for information on additional data layers. All data originally projected in the following coordinate system: EPSG:3175, NAD 1983 Great Lakes and St Lawrence Albers.This map will continue to be updated as new information is made available.Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - Acquired/Available:Topobathy and Bathy Lidar (NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/). Multibeam Sonar (National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Bathymetric Data Viewer: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/bathymetry/; NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/; USGS ScienceBaseCatalog: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/656e229bd34e7ca10833f950)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - GLRI AOIs (2020-2024):Acquisition: NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementValidation/CMECS Characterizations: NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - In Progress and Planned:NOAA Office of Coast Survey Plans: https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/Planned_Survey_Areas/MapServer/0NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementSource Data for Nearshore Water Depths:NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/grid-extract/Source Data for Spatial Prioritization Layers:Great Lakes Spatial Priorities Study Results Jun 2021. https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/IOCM/GreatLakes_SPS_Results_Jun_2021/MapServerMapping priorities within the proposed Wisconsin Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary (2018). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_WILMPrioritizationResults/MapServerThunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary Spatial Prioritization Results (2020). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_TBNMSPrioritizationResults/MapServerSource Data for Supplemental Data Layers:International Boundary Commission U.S./Canada Boundary (version 1.3 from 2018): https://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/en/maps-coordinates/coordinates.phpNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) HydroHealth 2018 Survey: https://wrecks.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/HydroHealth_2018/ImageServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas (MPA) Inventory 2023-2024: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/69506National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Sanctuary Program Boundaries (2021): https://services2.arcgis.com/C8EMgrsFcRFL6LrL/arcgis/rest/services/ONMS_2021_Boundaries/FeatureServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Bathymetry Gap Analysis: https://noaa.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=4d7d925fc96d47d9ace970dd5040df0aU.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Areas of Concern: https://services.arcgis.com/cJ9YHowT8TU7DUyn/arcgis/rest/services/epa_areas_of_concern_glahf_viewlayer/FeatureServerU.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Great Lakes Subbasins: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/530f8a0ee4b0e7e46bd300dd Latest update: February 20, 2025

This map shows the total change in the average July–September surface water temperatures in 34 North American lakes from 1985 to 2009, as measured by satellites. Red circles represent warming; blue circles represent cooling. Larger circles indicate larger changes. Circles with black borders represent lakes where the trend was statistically significant.

This data set consists of a subset of a 1-degree gridded global freshwater wetlands database (Stillwell-Soller et al. 1995). This subset was created for the study area of the Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA) in South America (i.e., 10? N to 25? S, 30? to 85? W). The data are in ASCII GRID format.

The global freshwater wetlands database was assembled from two data sets: Aselman and Crutzen's (1989) wetlands data set and Klinger's political Alaska data set (pers. comm. to L. M. Stillwell-Soller, 1995). The aim of Stillwell-Soller's global data set was to provide an accurate, comprehensive and uniform set of files for convenient specification of wetlands in global climate models. The main source of data was Aselman and Crutzen's global maps of percent cover for a variety of wetlands categories at 2.5-degree latitude by 5-degree longitude resolution. There was some reorganization for seasonally varying categories. Aselman and Crutzen's data were interpolated to a standard 1-degree by 1-degree grid through bilinear interpolation. Their data were geographically complete except for the Alaskan region, for which Klinger's data set provided values.

More information can be found at ftp://daac.ornl.gov/data/lba/land_use_land_cover_change/soller_wetlands/comp/soller_readme.pdf.

LBA was a cooperative international research initiative led by Brazil. NASA was a lead sponsor for several experiments. LBA was designed to create the new knowledge needed to understand the climatological, ecological, biogeochemical, and hydrological functioning of Amazonia; the impact of land use change on these functions; and the interactions between Amazonia and the Earth system. More information about LBA can be found at http://www.daac.ornl.gov/LBA/misc_amazon.html.

This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release presents a digital database of geospatially enabled vector layers and tabular data transcribed from the geologic map of the Lake Owen quadrangle, Albany County, Wyoming, which was originally published as U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1304 (Houston and Orback, 1976). The 7.5-minute Lake Owen quadrangle is located in southeastern Wyoming approximately 25 miles (40 kilometers) southwest of Laramie in the west-central interior of southern Albany County, and covers most of the southern extent of Sheep Mountain, the southeastern extent of Centennial Valley, and a portion of the eastern Medicine Bow Mountains. This relational geodatabase, with georeferenced data layers digitized at the publication scale of 1:24,000, organizes and describes the geologic and structural data covering the quadrangle's approximately 35,954 acres and enables the data for use in spatial analyses and computer cartography. The data types present ...

Beaver Lake was constructed in 1966 on the White River in the northwest corner of Arkansas for flood control, hydroelectric power, public water supply, and recreation. The surface area of Beaver Lake is about 27,900 acres and approximately 449 miles of shoreline are at the conservation pool level (1,120 feet above the North American Vertical Datum of 1988). Sedimentation in reservoirs can result in reduced water storage capacity and a reduction in usable aquatic habitat. Therefore, accurate and up-to-date estimates of reservoir water capacity are important for managing pool levels, power generation, water supply, recreation, and downstream aquatic habitat. Many of the lakes operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are periodically surveyed to monitor bathymetric changes that affect water capacity. In October 2018, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, completed one such survey of Beaver Lake using a multibeam echosounder. The echosounder data was combined with light detection and ranging (lidar) data to prepare a bathymetric map and a surface area and capacity table. Collection of bathymetric data in October 2018 at Beaver Lake near Rogers, Arkansas, used a marine-based mobile mapping unit that operates with several components: a multibeam echosounder (MBES) unit, an inertial navigation system (INS), and a data acquisition computer. Bathymetric data were collected using the MBES unit in longitudinal transects to provide complete coverage of the lake. The MBES was tilted in some areas to improve data collection along the shoreline, in coves, and in areas that are shallower than 2.5 meters deep (the practical limit of reasonable and safe data collection with the MBES). Two bathymetric datasets collected during the October 2018 survey include the gridded bathymetric point data (BeaverLake2018_bathy.zip) computed on a 3.28-foot (1-meter) grid using the Combined Uncertainty and Bathymetry Estimator (CUBE) method, and the bathymetric quality-assurance dataset (BeaverLake2018_QA.zip). The gridded point data used to create the bathymetric surface (BeaverLake2018_bathy.zip) was quality-assured with data from 9 selected resurvey areas (BeaverLake2018_QA.zip) to test the accuracy of the gridded bathymetric point data. The data are provided as comma delimited text files that have been compressed into zip archives. The shoreline was created from bare-earth lidar resampled to a 3.28-foot (1-meter) grid spacing. A contour line representing the flood pool elevation of 1,135 feet was generated from the gridded data. The data are provided in the Environmental Systems Research Institute shapefile format and have the common root name of BeaverLake2018_1135-ft. All files in the shapefile group must be retrieved to be useable.

The USNIC Great Lakes Ice Chart Web Service is made up of Analysis polygon features classes. The Great Lakes Analysis GIS Shapefile and KMZ file are created and loaded into CloudGIS Database for use in the USNIC Great Lakes Ice Chart Web Service from the North American Ice Service daily Great Lakes Analysis coordinated between the U.S. National Ice Center and Canadian Ice Service. The daily Great Lakes Analysis contains SIGRID-3 information on ice conditions that are separated into various fields including total ice concentration, ice types and their respective partial concentrations, and floe size, among others. This analysis is updated daily, valid at 18 UTC, and available at https://usicecenter.gov/Products/GreatLakesData.The SIGRID-3 vector archive format is one of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) standards for archiving digital ice charts. The U.S National Ice Center (USNIC) creates SIGRID-3 ice charts on a regular basis for a number of regions in the Arctic, Antarctic, Great Lakes and U.S. East Coast. These SIGRID-3 files have two main components: the shapefile containing the ice analysis information (ice polygons and related attributes) and the metadata describing the ice analysis data under the SIGRID-3 format. Current and legacy data for many USNIC products can be found through the USNIC website (https://usicecenter.gov/), the National Snow and Ice Data Center (https://nsidc.org/) or, for the Great Lakes specifically, through the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (https://www.glerl.noaa.gov/). The joint North American Ice Service analysis from which this USNIC product derives represents ice conditions valid at approximately 1800 UTC but is analyzed from imagery over the preceding 24hrs. Imagery utilized includes synthetic aperture radar (SAR), geostationary imagery such as GOES, polar orbiting imagery such as VIIRS, other optical or infrared sensors prioritized by regency and image quality, and application of an understanding of conditions gained from surface stations, radar, and forecast weather conditions.Update Frequency: Daily at 1800UTCLink to metadataFor questions about the underlying data or other ice datasets, please see https://usicecenter.gov/Contact.Questions/Concerns about the service, please contact the DISS-GIS team.Time Information:This service is not time enabled.

THIS MAP IS NOT AUTHORITATIVE. SEE TERMS OF USE BELOW.This web map contains data layers reflecting the current status of bathy data coverage in the nearshore (0-80 meters) of the U.S. Great Lakes, including acquisition (lidar and multibeam sonar), ground-truthing/validation, and benthic habitat mapping and characterization. Acquisition layers include coverage areas that have been acquired and are available for public use (green) as well as those that have been acquired, but are not yet available or are still in progress (orange). The nearshore water depth layers (0-25 and 25-80 meters) were created using the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts. The 0 to 25 meter nearshore water depth layer represents areas where bathymetric lidar data acquisition could ideally be conducted, depending on water condition and turbidity. The 25 to 80 meter layer shows locations where acoustic data acquisition can occur. See below for information on additional data layers. All data originally projected in the following coordinate system: EPSG:3175, NAD 1983 Great Lakes and St Lawrence Albers.This map will continue to be updated as new information is made available.Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - Acquired/Available:Topobathy and Bathy Lidar (NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/). Multibeam Sonar (National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Bathymetric Data Viewer: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/bathymetry/; NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/; USGS ScienceBaseCatalog: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/656e229bd34e7ca10833f950)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - GLRI AOIs (2020-2024):Acquisition: NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementValidation/CMECS Characterizations: NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - In Progress and Planned:NOAA Office of Coast Survey Plans: https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/Planned_Survey_Areas/MapServer/0NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementSource Data for Nearshore Water Depths:NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/grid-extract/Source Data for Spatial Prioritization Layers:Great Lakes Spatial Priorities Study Results Jun 2021. https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/IOCM/GreatLakes_SPS_Results_Jun_2021/MapServerMapping priorities within the proposed Wisconsin Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary (2018). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_WILMPrioritizationResults/MapServerThunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary Spatial Prioritization Results (2020). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_TBNMSPrioritizationResults/MapServerSource Data for Supplemental Data Layers:International Boundary Commission U.S./Canada Boundary (version 1.3 from 2018): https://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/en/maps-coordinates/coordinates.phpNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) HydroHealth 2018 Survey: https://wrecks.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/HydroHealth_2018/ImageServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas (MPA) Inventory 2023-2024: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/69506National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Sanctuary Program Boundaries (2021): https://services2.arcgis.com/C8EMgrsFcRFL6LrL/arcgis/rest/services/ONMS_2021_Boundaries/FeatureServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Bathymetry Gap Analysis: https://noaa.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=4d7d925fc96d47d9ace970dd5040df0aU.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Areas of Concern: https://services.arcgis.com/cJ9YHowT8TU7DUyn/arcgis/rest/services/epa_areas_of_concern_glahf_viewlayer/FeatureServerU.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Great Lakes Subbasins: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/530f8a0ee4b0e7e46bd300dd Latest update: February 19, 2025

This layer is sourced from maritimeboundaries.noaa.gov.

The ENC_Coastal map service displays ENC data within the scale range of 1:150,001 and 1:600,000. The ENC data will be updated weekly. This map service is not intended for navigation purpose.

This layer is sourced from maritimeboundaries.noaa.gov.

The ENC_General map service displays ENC data within the scale range of 1:600,001 and 1:1,500,000. The ENC data will be updated weekly. This map service is not intended for navigation purpose.

Heavy rainfall occurred across Louisiana during March 8-19, 2016, as a result of a massive, slow-moving southward dip in the jet stream, which moved eastward across Mexico, then neared the Gulf Coast, funneling deep tropical moisture into parts of the Gulf States and the Mississippi River Valley. The storm caused major flooding in north-central and southeastern Louisiana. Digital flood-inundation maps for a 20.1-mile reach within the community of Minden near Lake Bistineau in Bossier Parish and Bienville Parish, LA was created by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to support response and recovery operations following a March 8-19, 2016 flood event. The inundation maps depict estimates of the areal extent and depth of flooding corresponding to 5 high-water marks (HWM) identified and surveyed by the USGS following the flood event.

Water supply lakes are the primary source of water for many communities in northern and western Missouri. Therefore, accurate and up-to-date estimates of lake capacity are important for managing and predicting adequate water supply. Many of the water supply lakes in Missouri were previously surveyed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in the early 2000s (Richards, 2013) and in 2013 (Huizinga, 2014); however, years of potential sedimentation may have resulted in reduced water storage capacity. Periodic bathymetric surveys are useful to update the area/capacity table and to determine changes in the bathymetric surface. In April and May 2022, the USGS, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR) and in collaboration with the cities of Cameron, Springfield, and Unionville, Missouri, completed bathymetric surveys of seven (7) lakes using a marine-based mobile mapping unit, which consists of a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and an inertial navigation system (INS) mounted on a marine survey vessel. Bathymetric data were collected as the vessel traversed longitudinal transects to provide nearly complete coverage of the lake. The MBES was electronically tilted in some areas to improve data collection along the shoreline, in coves, and in areas that are shallower than about 2.0 meters deep (the practical limit of reasonable and safe data collection with the MBES). At some lakes, supplemental data were collected in shallow areas using an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) mounted on a remote-controlled vessel equipped with a differential global positioning system (DGPS). Bathymetric quality-assurance data also were collected at each lake to evaluate the vertical accuracy of the gridded bathymetric point data from the MBES. As part of the survey at each of these lakes, one or more reference marks or temporary bench marks were established to provide a point of known location and elevation from which the water surface could be measured or another survey could be referenced at a later date. In addition, the elevation of a primary spillway or intake was surveyed, when present. These points were surveyed using a real-time kinematic (RTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver connected to the Missouri Department of Transportation real-time network (RTN), which provided real-time survey-grade horizontal and vertical positioning, using field procedures as described in Rydlund and Densmore (2012) for a Level II real-time positioning survey. The MBES data can be combined with light detection and ranging (lidar) data to prepare a bathymetric map and a surface area and capacity table for each lake. These data also can be used to compare the current bathymetric surface with any previous bathymetric surface. Data from each of the surveys are provided in ESRI Shapefile format (ESRI, 2023). Each of the seven lakes surveyed in 2022 has a child page containing the metadata and two zip files, one for the bathymetric data, and the other for the bathymetric quality-assurance data. The zip files follow the format of "####2022_bathy_pts.zip" or ####2022_QA_raw.zip," where "####" is the lake name. Each of these zip files contains a shapefile with an attribute table. Attribute/column labels of each table are described in the "Entity and attribute" section of the metadata file. The various reference marks and additional points from all the lake surveys are provided in ESRI Shapefile format (ESRI, 2023) with an attribute table on the main landing page. Attribute/column labels of this table are described in the "Entity and attribute" section of the metadata file. References Cited: Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2023, ArcGIS: accessed July 12, 2023, at https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/about-arcgis/overview Huizinga, R.J., 2014, Bathymetric surveys and area/capacity tables of water-supply reservoirs for the city of Cameron, Missouri, July 2013: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1005, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141005. Richards, J.M., 2013, Bathymetric surveys of selected lakes in Missouri—2000–2008: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1101, 9 p. with appendix, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131101. Rydlund, P.H., Jr., and Densmore, B.K., 2012, Methods of practice and guidelines for using survey-grade global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) to establish vertical datum in the United States Geological Survey: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 11, chap. D1, 102 p. with appendixes, https://doi.org/10.3133/tm11D1. First posted November 29, 2023 Revised July 31, 2024, ver. 1.1

The Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve and Vicinity, Alaska is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (lacl_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (lacl_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (lacl_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (lacl_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (lacl_surficial_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (lacl_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the lacl_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (lacl_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or lacl_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:250,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 127 meters or 416.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

This layer is a component of Bands 4 and 5.

The ENC_Approach map service displays data compiled for ENC products with a scale range of 1:50,001 and 1:150,000. The ENC data used within this application will be updated weekly. This map service is not intended for navigation purpose.

The geodatabase contains 13 relate tables that together provide updated and synchronized classifications to an existing vegetation map layer for each of the nine park units in the Great Lakes Network (GLKN) of the National Park Service (NPS) Natural Resource Inventory and Monitoring Program. The classifications include 1) vegetation types at every hierarchical level in the 2015 version of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and 2) map classes that represent vegetation and land cover in the vegetation map layers. Furthermore, the tables provide a crosswalk between the two classifications (vegetation and map). Each park unit in GLKN has received, at different times over several years, vegetation data products from the NPS Vegetation Mapping Inventory (VMI) Program. However, the vegetation and map classifications were at different stages of development over these years. With this geodatabase product, having a series of already linked relate tables, the original vegetation map layer for each park unit can be linked to the updated and synchronized classification information for both vegetation types and map classes.

Great Lakes bathymetry has been compiled as a component of a NOAA project to synthesize Great Lakes lake floor geological and geophysical data and make it more accessible to the public. The project is a cooperative effort between investigators at the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center's Marine Geology, Geophysics Division (NGDC/MGG) and the NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) with data development utilizing the entire historic sounding data base. The entire historic hydrographic sounding data base from the U.S. and Canada, originally collected for nautical charting purposes, was used to create a complete and accurate representation of Lake Ontario bathymetry. The U.S. data primarily came from the NOS Hydrographic Survey Data. These and other bathymetric sounding data collected by the U.S. National Ocean Service's (NOS) Coast Survey and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers was employed to construct bathymetric contours at 1 meter intervals from 1-10 meters depth and 2 meter intervals at depths greater than 10 meters. Compilation map scales ranged from 1:10,000 to 1:50,000. Bathymetric sounding data collected by the Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS) were employed to construct bathymetric contours at 1 meter intervals and compilation map scales ranging from 1:1,000 to 1:30,000. Digitization of the bathymetric contours and merging of the bathymetric contour data sets was accomplished at the NGDC. Multibeam bathymetric data collected by the University of New Brunswick's Ocean Mapping Group (UNB-OMG), with support of the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) and the CHS, were kindly made available in gridded form. In the two areas where multibeam bathymetric data were available, no other bathymetric data were used in the compilations. In some areas all available Canadian and U. S. bathymetric sounding data, collected at different times on different survey expeditions, were used to derive the contours. The U.S. coastline used was primarily derived from the GLERL Medium Resolution Vector Shoreline dataset (Lee, 1998). Where move coverage was needed, the NOS Medium Resolution Vector Shoreline for the Conterminous U.S. (1994) dataset was used. Coastlines from the CHS bathymetric sounding data field sheets were used to complete the Canadian coastline. Images were constructed using the publicly-available software Generic Mapping Tools (GMT).

THIS MAP IS NOT AUTHORITATIVE. SEE TERMS OF USE BELOW.This web map was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management and is featured in the U.S. Great Lakes Collaborative Benthic Habitat Mapping Common Operating Dashboard in support of the Collaborative Benthic Habitat Mapping in the Nearshore Waters of the Great Lakes Basin Project. This multi-year, multi-agency project is funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) and focuses on new bathymetric data (airborne lidar and vessel based sonar) acquisition, validation, and benthic habitat characterization mapping of the nearshore waters (0-80 meters) in the U.S. Great Lakes. This project also contributes to the regional Lakebed 2030 campaign, which aims to have high-density bathymetric data available for the entirety of the Great Lakes by 2030. This web map contains data layers reflecting the current status of bathy data coverage in the nearshore (0-80 meters) of the U.S. Great Lakes, including acquisition (lidar and multibeam sonar), ground-truthing/validation, and benthic habitat mapping and characterization. Acquisition layers include coverage areas that have been acquired and are available for public use (green) as well as those that have been acquired, but are not yet available or are still in progress (orange). The nearshore water depth layers (0-25 and 25-80 meters) were created using the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts. The 0 to 25 meter nearshore water depth layer represents areas where bathymetric lidar data acquisition could ideally be conducted, depending on water condition and turbidity. The 25 to 80 meter layer shows locations where acoustic data acquisition can occur. The acquired data values are all in sq. km and were created by merging and dissolving all publicly available bathy lidar and multibeam sonar coverage polygons into single layer and erasing from the nearshore water depth layers (0-25, 25-80, and 0-80 meters). All polygon layers were clipped using the USGS Great Lakes subbasin polygon shapefile and the U.S./Canada boundary from the International Boundary Commission (version 1.3 from 2018). All data originally projected in the following coordinate system: EPSG:3175, NAD 1983 Great Lakes and St Lawrence Albers.This map will continue to be updated as new information is made available.See below for information on additional data layers. Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - Acquired/Available:Topobathy and Bathy Lidar (NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/). Multibeam Sonar (National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Bathymetric Data Viewer: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/bathymetry/; NOAA's Data Access Viewer: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/; U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI): https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/; USGS ScienceBaseCatalog: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/656e229bd34e7ca10833f950)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - GLRI AOIs (2020-2024):Acquisition: NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementValidation/CMECS Characterizations: NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)Source Data for Bathy Coverage Layers - In Progress and Planned:NOAA Office of Coast Survey Plans: https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/Planned_Survey_Areas/MapServer/0NOAA Office for Coastal ManagementSource Data for Nearshore Water Depths:NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Great Lakes Bathymetry (3-second resolution) grid extracts: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/grid-extract/Source Data for Spatial Prioritization Layers:Great Lakes Spatial Priorities Study Results Jun 2021. https://gis.charttools.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/IOCM/GreatLakes_SPS_Results_Jun_2021/MapServerMapping priorities within the proposed Wisconsin Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary (2018). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_WILMPrioritizationResults/MapServerThunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary Spatial Prioritization Results (2020). https://gis.ngdc.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nccos/BiogeographicAssessments_TBNMSPrioritizationResults/MapServerSource Data for Supplemental Data Layers:International Boundary Commission U.S./Canada Boundary (version 1.3 from 2018): https://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/en/maps-coordinates/coordinates.phpNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) HydroHealth 2018 Survey: https://wrecks.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Hydrographic_Services/HydroHealth_2018/ImageServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas (MPA) Inventory 2023-2024: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/69506National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Sanctuary Program Boundaries (2021): https://services2.arcgis.com/C8EMgrsFcRFL6LrL/arcgis/rest/services/ONMS_2021_Boundaries/FeatureServerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Bathymetry Gap Analysis: https://noaa.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=4d7d925fc96d47d9ace970dd5040df0aU.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Areas of Concern: https://services.arcgis.com/cJ9YHowT8TU7DUyn/arcgis/rest/services/epa_areas_of_concern_glahf_viewlayer/FeatureServerU.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Great Lakes Subbasins: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/530f8a0ee4b0e7e46bd300dd Latest update: February 20, 2025

Clearwater Lake, on the Black River near Piedmont in Reynolds County, Missouri, was constructed in 1948 and is operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for flood-risk reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat. The lake area is about 1,800 acres with about 34 miles of shoreline at the conservation pool elevation of 498 feet. Periodically, many lakes operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have bathymetric and sediment surveys to monitor the status of the lake. In May 2017, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, surveyed the bathymetry of Clearwater Lake to prepare an updated bathymetric map and surface area and capacity table. A previous survey completed in 2008 was contrasted with the 2017 survey to document the changes in the bathymetric surface of the lake. Data sets included are the bathymetric data points collected during the 2017 bathymetric survey. There are two data sets included: the multibeam data (averaged to 3.28 feet) that was used as the source of points to create the bathymetric surface and the raw multibeam data from 4 selected resurvey areas that was used as quality assurance data to test the accuracy of the 3.28-feet spacing data points. Richards, J.M., and Huizinga, R.J., 2018, Bathymetric contour map, surface area and capacity table, and bathymetric difference map for Clearwater Lake near Piedmont, Missouri, 2017: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3409, 1 sheet, https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3409.

Terminal lakes are lakes with no hydrologic surface outflows and with losses of water occurring only through surface evaporation and groundwater discharge. We quantified the extent of the littoral zones (areas where 1% or more of surface irradiation reaches the lake bottom) and open water zones (areas where less than 1% of surface irradiation reaches the lake bottom) in 18 terminal lakes. Additionally, we quantified habitat usage and diets of the fish species inhabiting these lakes. This dataset contains includes seven lakes from North America (Atitlan, Crater, Eagle, Mann, Pyramid, Summit, Walker), one from South America (Titicaca), five from Eurasia (Caspian, Issyk-Kul, Neusiedl, Qinghai, Van), and five from Africa (Abijatta, Manyara, Nakuru, Shala, Turkana). Methods Measurements of the surface areas of the littoral and open water zones were performed using ArcGIS Pro Version 2.9. First, we generated year-specific digital elevation models (DEMs) of the lake’s bathymetry by a) using existing bathymetry raster data or b) by digitizing published depth contours of the lake’s bathymetry and interpolating a bathymetry raster using a natural neighbor interpolation. For several lakes that showed significant changes in lake level and where data regarding lake level change were available, we were able to produce a second year closer to the present by using the Raster Calculator function in ArcGIS Pro and then clipping the bathymetry raster to the lower lake level. This was possible for 5 of the 18 lakes (Mann Lake, Eagle Lake, Lake Abijatta, Walker Lake, and Lake Turkana), allowing us to map changes in the littoral zone size between the two years. For the lakes containing two years of data, we used only the most recent year in all subsequent analyses. We defined the portions of the littoral zone of the lake as the portions where the intensity of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) reaching the lake bottom is 1% or greater relative to the intensity at the surface. For lakes where 1% PAR depth was not published, we calculated 1% PAR depth from published light profiles using the Lambert-Beer Law: 0.01 = e-u*z where µ is the light attenuation coefficient (meters-1) and z is 1% PAR depth (meters). For lakes where neither 1% PAR depth nor light profiles were published, we approximated the 1% PAR depth by multiplying the Secchi depth of the lake by a coefficient of 2.5. We sought the most recently collected Secchi depth to make these calculations. We then used the Raster Calculator function in ArcGIS PRO 2.9 to determine the portions of the lake where depth was less than or greater than the 1% PAR depth to map the open water and littoral zones, respectively. Fish species inventories and information regarding each species’ habitat and diet was compiled from 1) published peer-reviewed primary literature, 2) non-peer-reviewed literature (books, reports by government agencies or private firms), 3) online databases (i.e., FishBase (https://www.fishbase.de/home.htm), California Fish Website (www.calfish.ucdavis.edu)), and/or 4) experts studying the ecology of the species or lake ecosystem. We employed a conservative view regarding species taxonomy (i.e., ‘lumping’ rather than ‘splitting’). We classified species’ habitats with respect to three categories: 1) littoral zone (occurring in parts of the lake where 1% or more of the surface radiation reaches the lake bottom), 2) open water zone (occurring in parts of the lake where less than 1% of the surface radiation reaches the lake bottom), and 3) littoral & open water zone (occurring in both lake zones). These habitat classifications were based on adult habitat use only, and habitat use during larval and juvenile stages was not considered. We classified diets with respect to seven categories: 1) plankton only, 2) periphyton only, 3) periphyton and macroinvertebrates, 4) periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and plankton, 5) periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish, 6) fish OR fish and plankton, and 7) fish, plankton, periphyton, and macroinvertebrates.