This map displays Maternal and Newborn Health Policy data, provided by the WHO, for countries that have an International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) membership and completed the required surveys. This map also drives the Maternal and Newborn Health WHO Policy Mapping Application, found here: https://directrelief.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=a48053e7a6e34cc595652dff6f4ebe6cThis map is just one of the many data visualizations on the Global Midwives Hub, a digital resource with open data, maps, and mapping applications (among other things), to support advocacy for improved maternal and newborn services, supported by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM), UNFPA, WHO, and Direct Relief.

Designed to be viewed with VosViewer software. Shows the fields of policy sciences as they relate to one another with data over 10-years time.

Generalized Policy from the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Act of 2010, effective April 8, 2011.This data set is part of the Comprehensive Plan of the District of Columbia. It categorizes how different parts of the District may change by 2025. It highlights areas where more detailed Comprehensive Plan policies have been provided to manage this change. These policies may generally be found in the ten Area Elements. This dataset should be used to guide land use decision-making in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan text, the Future Land Use Map, and other Comprehensive Plan maps. Boundaries within the dataset are to be interpreted in conjunction with these other resources in addition to the information shown here.

Designed to be viewed with VosViewer software to see the interrelationships of journals in policy studies.

A geographic sub-area of the County delineated by the Planning Board and adopted by the County Council in the Growth Policy for the purpose of staging analysis and the establishment of transportation staging ceiling capacities.For more information, contact: GIS Manager Information Technology & Innovation (ITI) Montgomery County Planning Department, MNCPPC T: 301-650-5620

This is a ArcGIS StoryMap Collection that was compiled from the Esri Maps for Public Policy site to show successful examples of policy maps. Browse each item to see examples of different types of policy maps, and learn how each map clearly shows areas to intervene.Items included:Where are schools that fall within areas of poor broadband/internet?Black or African American Population without Health InsuranceIncluding Transportation Costs in Location AffordabilityWhich areas with poor air quality also have higher populations of people of color?Grocery Store AccessSchool District Characteristics and Socioeconomic InformationWhat is the most frequently occurring fire risk?Up and Down COVID-19 TrendsWhere are the highest and lowest incomes in the US?Top 10 Most Job Accessible Cities in the U.S.Los Angeles County Homelessness & Housing MapHow the Age of Housing Impacts AffordabilityStudent Loans or Mortgage? Young Adults Can't Afford Both.You Can Get a Bachelor's at Some Community Colleges

OVERVIEWThis site is dedicated to raising the level of spatial and data literacy used in public policy. We invite you to explore curated content, training, best practices, and datasets that can provide a baseline for your research, analysis, and policy recommendations. Learn about emerging policy questions and how GIS can be used to help come up with solutions to those questions.EXPLOREGo to your area of interest and explore hundreds of maps about various topics such as social equity, economic opportunity, public safety, and more. Browse and view the maps, or collect them and share via a simple URL. Sharing a collection of maps is an easy way to use maps as a tool for understanding. Help policymakers and stakeholders use data as a driving factor for policy decisions in your area.ISSUESBrowse different categories to find data layers, maps, and tools. Use this set of content as a driving force for your GIS workflows related to policy. RESOURCESTo maximize your experience with the Policy Maps, we’ve assembled education, training, best practices, and industry perspectives that help raise your data literacy, provide you with models, and connect you with the work of your peers.

🇬🇧 영국

Important – This dataset should be used for historical purposes only. Adopted Land Use Recommendations derived from the District Plans and updated with Area Plans, Streetscape Plans, Pedscape Plans, Rezoning cases, and Plan Amendments. The database covers Charlotte's Sphere of Influence. For up-to-date future land use guidance, the Charlotte Future 2040 Policy Map dataset should be used.

The Law of 14 November 1996 implementing the City Recovery Pact (PRV) distinguished three levels of intervention: sensitive urban areas, urban revitalisation zones (ZRUs), urban free zones (ZFU). These three levels of intervention ZUS, ZRU and ZFU, characterised by devices of increasing importance, were intended to respond to different degrees of difficulties encountered in those neighbourhoods. Since then, the Planning Law for City and Urban Cohesion of 21 February 2014 has laid down (Article 5) the modalities for the reform of the priority geography of city policy. Two decrees issued in 2014 (No 2014-767 of 3 July 2014 and No 2014-1575 of 22 December 2014) set out these arrangements for the metropolis and for the ultramarine territories respectively. Thus, the national list of priority neighbourhoods of the city policy (Decrees n°2014-1750 and n° 2014-1751 of 30 December 2014) was produced and the national mapping of their perimeters was published. These perimeters replace sensitive urban areas (SEZs) and urban social cohesion contract (CUCS) neighbourhoods as of 1 January 2015.

Data used in the policy statistics map as service-specific data for configuring the utilization service

Maps for policy rules for major rivers, adapted to: Decree of the Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management, dated 30 June 2020, no. IENW BSK-2020 107512 amending the policy rules for major rivers in connection with changes to the overview map and map appendices

Cartographic symbol to refer users to Policy Area 8.4.16 of the Regional Official Plan. ROP Consolidation September 3, 2024.

This deposit contains the taxonomy maps and data we used to translate data on COVID-19 government responses from 7 different datasets into taxonomy developed by the CoronaNet Research Project (CoronaNet; Cheng et al 2020). These taxonomy maps form the basis of our efforts to harmonize this data into the CoronaNet database. The following taxonomy maps are deposited in the 'Taxonomy' folder:ACAPS COVID-19 Government Measures - CoronaNet Taxonomy Map Canadian Data Set of COVID-19 Interventions from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) - CoronaNet Taxonomy Map COVID Analysis and Maping of Policies (COVID AMP) - CoronaNet Taxonomy Map Johns Hopkins Health Intervention Tracking for COVID-19 (HIT-COVID) - CoronaNet Taxonomy Map Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) - CoronaNet Taxonomy Map World Health Organisation Public Health and Safety Measures (WHO PHSM) - CoronaNet Taxonomy MapMeanwhile the 'Data' folder contains the raw and mapped data for each external dataset (i.e. ACAPS, CIHI, COVID AMP, HIT-COVID, OxCGRT and WHO PHSM) as well as the combined external data for Steps 1 and 3 of the data harmonization process described in Cheng et al (2023) 'Harmonizing Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.'

This Excel database maps key public and private policies and governance mechanisms regulating legal and sustainable forest and ecosystem-risk biomass value chains across demand and supply-side countries and regions.

COMPLETED 2010. The data was converted from the most recent (2010) versions of the adopted plans, which can be found at https://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/Supplemental Information: In March 2010, Pima Association of Governments (PAG), in cooperation with the City of Tucson (City), initiated the Planned Land Use Data Conversion Project. This 9-month effort involved evaluating mapped land use designations and selected spatially explicit policies for nearly 50 of the City's adopted neighborhood, area, and subregional plans and converting the information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) format. Further documentation for this file can be obtained from the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department or Pima Association of Governments Technical Services. A brief summary report was provided, as requested, to the City of Tucson which highlights some of the key issues found during the conversion process (e.g., lack of mapping and terminology consistency among plans). The feature class "Plan_boundaries" represents the boundaries of the adopted plans. The feature class "Plan_mapped_land_use" represents the land use designations as they are mapped in the adopted plans. Some information was gathered that is implicit based on the land use designation or zones (see field descriptions below). Since this information is not explicitly stated in the plans, it should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes. The feature class "Plan_selected_policies" represents the spatially explicit policies that were fairly straightforward to map. Since these policies are not represented in adopted maps, this feature class should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes only.2010 - created by Jamison Brown, working as an independent contractor for Pima Association of Governments, created this file in 2010 by digitizing boundaries as depicted (i.e. for the mapped land use) or described in the plans (i.e. for the narrative policies). In most cases, this involved tracing based on parcel (paregion) or street center line (stnetall) feature classes. Snapping was used to provide line coincidence. For some map conversions, freehand sketches were drawn to mimick the freehand sketches in the adopted plan. Field descriptionsField descriptions for the "Plan_boundaries" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number ADOPT_DATE: Date of Plan adoption IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator Field descriptions for the "Plan_mapped_land_use" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number LU_DES: Land use designation (e.g., Low density residential) LISTED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Allowable zones as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MIN: Minimum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_TARGET: Target residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MAX: Maximum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MIN: Minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_TARGET: Target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MAX: Maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan BUILDING_HEIGHT_MAX Building height maximum (ft.) if determined by Plan policy IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator IMPLIED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Implied (not listed in the Plan) allowable zones IMPLIED_RAC_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_LU_CATEGORY: Implied (not listed in the Plan) general land use category. General categories used include residential, office, commercial, industrial, and other.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactJohn BeallCity of Tucson Development Services520-791-5550John.Beall@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

The unprecedented travel bans introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a pertinent phenomenon of interest to scholars across the globe. Quantifying the timing and content of policy changes affecting travel and immigration is key to future research on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the socioeconomic impacts of these policies. The COVID Border Accountability Project (COBAP) provides a systematized dataset of >1000 policies, reflecting a timeline of new country-level restrictions on movement across international borders during the 2020 year. Using a 20-question survey, trained research assistants (RAs) sourced and documented for each new border policy: start and end dates, whether the closure constitutes a "complete closure" or "partial closure", which exceptions are made, which countries are banned, and which borders are closed, among other variables. In addition, the full text of each policy was included in the database. We maintain and update the data monthly. For public use, we visualize the data in an interactive map tool visualization: covidborderaccountability.org. For ongoing and future pandemic research, the dataset will be useful to policymakers, social and biomedical scientists, and public health experts alike.

Cabinets-based taxonomy description.

The Law of 14 November 1996 implementing the City Recovery Pact (PRV) distinguished three levels of intervention: sensitive urban areas, urban revitalisation zones (ZRUs), urban free zones (ZFU). These three levels of intervention ZUS, ZRU and ZFU, characterised by devices of increasing importance, were intended to respond to different degrees of difficulties encountered in those neighbourhoods. Since then, the Planning Law for City and Urban Cohesion of 21 February 2014 has laid down (Article 5) the modalities for the reform of the priority geography of city policy. Two decrees issued in 2014 (No 2014-767 of 3 July 2014 and No 2014-1575 of 22 December 2014) set out these arrangements for the metropolis and for the ultramarine territories respectively. Thus, the national list of priority neighbourhoods of the city policy (Decrees n°2014-1750 and n° 2014-1751 of 30 December 2014) was produced and the national mapping of their perimeters was published. These perimeters replace sensitive urban areas (SEZs) and urban social cohesion contract (CUCS) neighbourhoods as of 1 January 2015.

Community Planning Areas are 15 boundaries that cover Charlotte's planning jurisdiction.