Discover the booming GIS mapping tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $15B market in 2025 projected to reach $39B by 2033, driven by cloud adoption, AI integration, and surging demand across sectors. Explore key trends, leading companies (Esri, ArcGIS, QGIS, etc.), and regional growth forecasts.

The booming GIS Mapping Tools market is projected to reach $45 billion by 2033, driven by cloud adoption and AI. Explore market trends, key players (Esri, Autodesk, Hexagon), and regional growth in this comprehensive analysis.

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! Explore key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies in this $15 billion industry projected to reach $28 billion by 2033. Learn about cloud-based solutions, regional market shares, and the future of geographic information systems.

The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of Gulf Islands National Seashore (5-meter accuracy and 1-foot resolution 2006-2007 mapping), Mississippi and Florida is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (guis_geomorphology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (guis_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (guis_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (guis_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (guis_geomorphology_metadata.txt or guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:26,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 13.2 meters or 43.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Market Research Intellect's GIS Mapping Software Market Report highlights a valuation of USD 3.2 billion in 2024 and anticipates growth to USD 6.5 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 8.5% from 2026-2033.Explore insights on demand dynamics, innovation pipelines, and competitive landscapes.

The size of the GIS Mapping Software market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies shaping the future of spatial data. Explore market size, CAGR, regional insights, and application segments (Geological Exploration, Urban Planning, etc.). Learn how cloud-based solutions are revolutionizing GIS.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site and Vicinity, New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (sahi_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (sahi_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (sahi_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (sahi_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (sahi_geology_metadata.txt or sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Discover the booming interactive map creation tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $2.5 billion market in 2025, projected to reach $8 billion by 2033, driven by cloud-based solutions and growing data visualization needs. Learn about key players, market segmentation, and regional trends shaping this exciting sector.

The geographical mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions for enhanced accessibility and collaboration, the growing need for precise location data in various applications, and the increasing integration of GIS technology with other analytical tools. Applications such as geological exploration, water conservancy projects, and urban planning are major contributors to market growth, benefiting from the ability to visualize and analyze spatial data efficiently. While the market faces certain restraints, such as the high initial investment costs associated with some software solutions and the need for specialized expertise, these are being mitigated by the emergence of more affordable and user-friendly options, as well as increased training and educational resources. The market is segmented by application (Geological Exploration, Water Conservancy Project, Urban Plan, Others) and type (Cloud Based, Web Based), with cloud-based solutions gaining significant traction due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness. Major players in the market, including Esri, Autodesk, Mapbox, and others, are continuously innovating and introducing new features to cater to the evolving needs of their customers. This competitive landscape ensures continuous improvement in software capabilities and affordability, further propelling market expansion. The geographical distribution of this market is broad, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares due to established infrastructure and high adoption rates. However, the Asia-Pacific region is exhibiting particularly rapid growth, driven by increasing urbanization, infrastructure development, and government initiatives promoting the use of GIS technologies. This regional shift indicates significant future growth potential in emerging markets. The forecast period of 2025-2033 suggests continued expansion, with a projected CAGR reflecting the sustained demand across different geographical regions and application areas. While precise figures are unavailable, based on industry trends and available data, a conservative estimate for the current market size would place it in the high hundreds of millions of dollars, with steady and significant growth anticipated.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. We converted the photointerpreted data into a format usable in a geographic information system (GIS) by employing three fundamental processes: (1) orthorectify, (2) digitize, and (3) develop the geodatabase. All digital map automation was projected in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Zone 16, using the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Orthorectify: We orthorectified the interpreted overlays by using OrthoMapper, a softcopy photogrammetric software for GIS. One function of OrthoMapper is to create orthorectified imagery from scanned and unrectified imagery (Image Processing Software, Inc., 2002). The software features a method of visual orientation involving a point-and-click operation that uses existing orthorectified horizontal and vertical base maps. Of primary importance to us, OrthoMapper also has the capability to orthorectify the photointerpreted overlays of each photograph based on the reference information provided. Digitize: To produce a polygon vector layer for use in ArcGIS (Environmental Systems Research Institute [ESRI], Redlands, California), we converted each raster-based image mosaic of orthorectified overlays containing the photointerpreted data into a grid format by using ArcGIS. In ArcGIS, we used the ArcScan extension to trace the raster data and produce ESRI shapefiles. We digitally assigned map-attribute codes (both map-class codes and physiognomic modifier codes) to the polygons and checked the digital data against the photointerpreted overlays for line and attribute consistency. Ultimately, we merged the individual layers into a seamless layer. Geodatabase: At this stage, the map layer has only map-attribute codes assigned to each polygon. To assign meaningful information to each polygon (e.g., map-class names, physiognomic definitions, links to NVCS types), we produced a feature-class table, along with other supportive tables and subsequently related them together via an ArcGIS Geodatabase. This geodatabase also links the map to other feature-class layers produced from this project, including vegetation sample plots, accuracy assessment (AA) sites, aerial photo locations, and project boundary extent. A geodatabase provides access to a variety of interlocking data sets, is expandable, and equips resource managers and researchers with a powerful GIS tool.

The global mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across various sectors. While precise figures for market size and CAGR are absent from the provided data, a reasonable estimation can be made based on industry trends. Considering the presence of major players like Adobe, Autodesk, and Microsoft, and the consistent advancements in GIS technology and location-based services, a conservative estimate places the 2025 market size at approximately $15 billion USD. Assuming a steady growth trajectory influenced by factors like increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions, the integration of AI and machine learning for enhanced mapping capabilities, and the growing need for precise location data in logistics, urban planning, and environmental monitoring, a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8-10% over the forecast period (2025-2033) seems plausible. This would project market values significantly higher by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key trends. The increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and other geospatial data provides richer inputs for mapping applications. Furthermore, the rising adoption of mobile devices equipped with GPS technology and the proliferation of location-based services (LBS) are expanding the market's addressable user base. However, challenges remain, such as the high cost of advanced mapping software and the complexities associated with data integration and management. Nevertheless, the overall market outlook remains positive, with continued expansion anticipated across various segments and geographic regions. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups, leading to innovation and the continuous improvement of mapping technologies.

This is a link to the QGIS website where you can download open-source GIS software for viewing, analyzing and manipulating geodata like our downloadable shapefiles.

Discover the booming geographical mapping software market! This in-depth analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, regional insights, and leading companies shaping the future of geospatial technology. Learn about market size, CAGR, and top applications in urban planning, geological exploration, and more.

Global GIS Mapping Software market size 2025 was XX Million. GIS Mapping Software Industry compound annual growth rate (CAGR) will be XX% from 2025 till 2033.

The Geographic Information System (GIS) Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption across various sectors. While the provided data lacks specific market size figures, based on industry reports and observed trends in related technology sectors, we can estimate a 2025 market size of approximately $15 billion USD. This reflects the significant investments being made in spatial data infrastructure and the growing demand for location-based analytics. Assuming a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8%, the market is projected to reach roughly $25 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising need for precise mapping and location intelligence in environmental management, urban planning, and resource optimization. Furthermore, advancements in cloud-based GIS platforms, the increasing availability of big data, and the development of sophisticated geospatial analytics tools are fueling market expansion. The market is segmented by service type (Analyze, Visualize, Manage, Others) and application (primarily Environmental Agencies, but also extending to various sectors such as utilities, transportation, and healthcare). North America currently holds a significant market share due to early adoption and advanced technological infrastructure. However, regions like Asia-Pacific are demonstrating rapid growth, driven by increasing urbanization and infrastructure development. While the lack of readily available detailed market figures presents a challenge for complete precision in projection, the overall trend points to a considerable expansion of the GIS services sector over the forecast period. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large multinational corporations like Infosys and Intellias and smaller, specialized firms like EnviroScience and R&K Solutions, reflecting the diverse needs of the market. These companies compete based on their technological capabilities, industry expertise, and geographical reach. The ongoing integration of GIS with other technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), will further shape the market landscape, creating opportunities for innovation and differentiation. Challenges include the high initial investment costs associated with implementing GIS solutions and the need for skilled professionals to effectively utilize these technologies. However, the long-term benefits of improved decision-making and operational efficiency are driving wider adoption despite these hurdles. The future growth of the GIS services market hinges on the continued development of innovative technologies and the increasing awareness of the value that location-based insights provide across various industries.

The GIS Analytics market is booming, projected to reach $2979.7 million by 2025, with a 5.6% CAGR. Discover key drivers, trends, and restraints shaping this dynamic industry, including cloud adoption, location intelligence, and AI integration. Leading companies and regional market analysis are included.

Explore the dynamic Mapping Software market, driven by engineering and industrial design needs. Discover growth drivers, key trends, restraints, and leading companies shaping the future of geospatial solutions from 2019-2033.

In 2007, the California Ocean Protection Council initiated the California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP), designed to create a comprehensive seafloor map of high-resolution bathymetry, marine benthic habitats, and geology within California’s State Waters. The program supports a large number of coastal-zone- and ocean-management issues, including the California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008), which requires information about the distribution of ecosystems as part of the design and proposal process for the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. A focus of CSMP is to map California’s State Waters with consistent methods at a consistent scale. The CSMP approach is to create highly detailed seafloor maps through collection, integration, interpretation, and visualization of swath sonar data (the undersea equivalent of satellite remote-sensing data in terrestrial mapping), acoustic backscatter, seafloor video, seafloor photography, high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles, and bottom-sediment sampling data. The map products display seafloor morphology and character, identify potential marine benthic habitats, and illustrate both the surficial seafloor geology and shallow (to about 100 m) subsurface geology. It is emphasized that the more interpretive habitat and geology data rely on the integration of multiple, new high-resolution datasets and that mapping at small scales would not be possible without such data. This approach and CSMP planning is based in part on recommendations of the Marine Mapping Planning Workshop (Kvitek and others, 2006), attended by coastal and marine managers and scientists from around the state. That workshop established geographic priorities for a coastal mapping project and identified the need for coverage of “lands” from the shore strand line (defined as Mean Higher High Water; MHHW) out to the 3-nautical-mile (5.6-km) limit of California’s State Waters. Unfortunately, surveying the zone from MHHW out to 10-m water depth is not consistently possible using ship-based surveying methods, owing to sea state (for example, waves, wind, or currents), kelp coverage, and shallow rock outcrops. Accordingly, some of the data presented in this series commonly do not cover the zone from the shore out to 10-m depth. This data is part of a series of online U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications, each of which includes several map sheets, some explanatory text, and a descriptive pamphlet. Each map sheet is published as a PDF file. Geographic information system (GIS) files that contain both ESRI ArcGIS raster grids (for example, bathymetry, seafloor character) and geotiffs (for example, shaded relief) are also included for each publication. For those who do not own the full suite of ESRI GIS and mapping software, the data can be read using ESRI ArcReader, a free viewer that is available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcreader/index.html (last accessed September 20, 2013). The California Seafloor Mapping Program is a collaborative venture between numerous different federal and state agencies, academia, and the private sector. CSMP partners include the California Coastal Conservancy, the California Ocean Protection Council, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Geological Survey, California State University at Monterey Bay’s Seafloor Mapping Lab, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Center for Habitat Studies, Fugro Pelagos, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, including National Ocean Service–Office of Coast Surveys, National Marine Sanctuaries, and National Marine Fisheries Service), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey. These web services for the Offshore of Coal Oil Point map area includes data layers that are associated to GIS and map sheets available from the USGS CSMP web page at https://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/mapping/csmp/index.html. Each published CSMP map area includes a data catalog of geographic information system (GIS) files; map sheets that contain explanatory text; and an associated descriptive pamphlet. This web service represents the available data layers for this map area. Data was combined from different sonar surveys to generate a comprehensive high-resolution bathymetry and acoustic-backscatter coverage of the map area. These data reveal a range of physiographic including exposed bedrock outcrops, large fields of sand waves, as well as many human impacts on the seafloor. To validate geological and biological interpretations of the sonar data, the U.S. Geological Survey towed a camera sled over specific offshore locations, collecting both video and photographic imagery; these “ground-truth” surveying data are available from the CSMP Video and Photograph Portal at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7J1015K. The “seafloor character” data layer shows classifications of the seafloor on the basis of depth, slope, rugosity (ruggedness), and backscatter intensity and which is further informed by the ground-truth-survey imagery. The “potential habitats” polygons are delineated on the basis of substrate type, geomorphology, seafloor process, or other attributes that may provide a habitat for a specific species or assemblage of organisms. Representative seismic-reflection profile data from the map area is also include and provides information on the subsurface stratigraphy and structure of the map area. The distribution and thickness of young sediment (deposited over the past about 21,000 years, during the most recent sea-level rise) is interpreted on the basis of the seismic-reflection data. The geologic polygons merge onshore geologic mapping (compiled from existing maps by the California Geological Survey) and new offshore geologic mapping that is based on integration of high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter imagery seafloor-sediment and rock samplesdigital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles. The information provided by the map sheets, pamphlet, and data catalog has a broad range of applications. High-resolution bathymetry, acoustic backscatter, ground-truth-surveying imagery, and habitat mapping all contribute to habitat characterization and ecosystem-based management by providing essential data for delineation of marine protected areas and ecosystem restoration. Many of the maps provide high-resolution baselines that will be critical for monitoring environmental change associated with climate change, coastal development, or other forcings. High-resolution bathymetry is a critical component for modeling coastal flooding caused by storms and tsunamis, as well as inundation associated with longer term sea-level rise. Seismic-reflection and bathymetric data help characterize earthquake and tsunami sources, critical for natural-hazard assessments of coastal zones. Information on sediment distribution and thickness is essential to the understanding of local and regional sediment transport, as well as the development of regional sediment-management plans. In addition, siting of any new offshore infrastructure (for example, pipelines, cables, or renewable-energy facilities) will depend on high-resolution mapping. Finally, this mapping will both stimulate and enable new scientific research and also raise public awareness of, and education about, coastal environments and issues. Web services were created using an ArcGIS service definition file. The ArcGIS REST service and OGC WMS service include all Offshore Coal Oil Point map area data layers. Data layers are symbolized as shown on the associated map sheets.