Use this web map to link to other geospatial datasets available through county and city sites (Not comprehensive). May need to zoom in to see the participating cities. The county boundaries and city points were published by Washington State agencies and downloaded from geo.wa.gov. Locations are approximate, and no warranties are made regarding this data. The canvas basemap has been compiled by Esri and the ArcGIS user community from a variety of best available sources. Want to have your data site listed? Contact the Geospatial Program Office.

Washington State County Boundaries including Department of Natural Resources (DNR) county codes. This data is created from the WA Public Land Survey source data maintained by the DNR.WA County Boundaries Metadata

Political county boundaries for Washington state. Also as KINGCO for King County only.

The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual- chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth?s surface using the UTM projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000.

Historic rail line locations throughout Pierce County sourced from Washington State Archive and Bureau of Land Management historic maps dated from 1850's to 2010. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbplan_historic_railroads.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

This digital terrain model represents historical elevations along the valley of the North Fork Toutle River upstream of its confluence with the Green River in Cowlitz and Skamania Counties, Washington. Most elevations were derived from U.S. Geological Survey 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle maps published from 1953 to 1958 that were derived from aerial photographs taken in 1951 and 1952. Elevations representing the bed of Spirit Lake, at the head of the valley, were derived from a bathymetric map based on survey data from 1974. Elevations are in units of meters and have been adjusted to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.

Historic road arcs throughout Pierce County sourced from Washington State Archive and Bureau of Land Management historic maps dated from 1850's to 2010. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbplan_historic_roads.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

Revised Limited English Proficiency dataAs Of: 6/27/2019There are two data sources for the LEP map. LEP County layer represents OFM 2016 “estimate of population with limited English proficiency for the state and counties.” LEP County Subdivision and Census tract layers represent 2015 Census “Language spoken at home by ability to speak English for the population 5 years and over.” The both data sets were trimmed to display LEP speakers of at least 1,000 or 5% of the population.Point Of Contact:Lewis LujánLimited English Proficiency CoordinatorMitigation & Recovery SectionWashington Emergency Management DivisionOffice: (253) 512-7138 | Mobile: (253) 651-6185lewis.lujan@mil.wa.gov | www.mil.wa.govOffice Hours: Tues-Fri 7:00 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.Links:OFM :https://www.ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/legacy/pop/subject/ofm_pop_limited_english_proficiency_estimates_2016.xlsxCensus:https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_15_5YR_B16001&prodType=table

The Washington State Zoning Atlas (“WAZA” or “Atlas”) is a centralized database of spatial zoning data, hosted by the Department of Commerce. It provides simplified and accessible zoning information for Washington’s 39 counties and 281 cities (320 jurisdictions total) to the public. The interactive map and downloadable database illustrate key features and regulatory characteristics of zoning codes across jurisdictions. Data attributes for each zone include generalized land use categories, allowed uses, and development standards (e.g., building heights, densities, parking requirements). The Atlas makes it easier to compare zoning codes between jurisdictions and identify regional and statewide trends in regulation, which will strengthen local planning for housing, transportation, environmental impacts, climate response, and economic growth.The Washington State Zoning Atlas was developed by a team including MAKERS architecture and urban design LLP, the University of Washington, Western Washington University, BHC Consultants, and the Washington State Department of Commerce. Funding was allocated for this project in the Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5187.

Broadband State Funding layer for the WA State Broadband Office Digital Equity Dashboard. WA State Funding - Counties contains an overview of grant award programs in each county. CERB PWB WSBO Combined Awards table contains additional information about individual projects in each county.This web map is referenced by the Availability of Service (Funding Awards) Experience Builder used in the WA State Broadband Office Digital Equity Dashboard.

This data set depicts the county boundaries of the State of Washington. This data set was created by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources to meet that agency's need for land surveying, land title, and land management GIS data. It is part of the Washington State Cadastral Framework Data set. The Washington Cadastral Framework data represents an integrated set of geographic-referencing data covering the State of Washington. It is derived from Land Surveys, DNR Orthophotos, USGS 7-1/2 minute quadrangles, DNR Ownership Tract Book, and various public organizations. The initial data population includes Public Land Survey System information, state boundary, county boundaries, and Department of Natural Resource parcel information.If you have any questions about this data, please contact Thomas A. Blake, GIS Data Products Supervisor - blaket@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 570-2363. If you're having trouble viewing these services, please contact our Online Map Support.Attribute Definitions:Jurisdiction Name – Provides the name of the county.County Number – Provides the counties number.County FIPS Code - The unique code that identifies the counties of Washington State.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2017, primarily as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS).

For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Information for SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five-year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forestland taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue. The Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (now known as the Natural Resources Conservation Service or NRCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University conducted soil mapping cooperatively following national soil survey standards. Private lands having the potential of supporting commercial forests were surveyed along with interspersed small areas of State lands, Indian tribal lands, and federal lands. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soil map unit delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were later added and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS (NRCS) soils data on agricultural lands also have been subsequently added to this data layer. The SOILS data layer includes approximately 1,100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data. State and private lands which have the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soils survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. This layer includes approximately 1, 100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data (2,101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington).-

The soils_sv resolves one to many relationships and as such is one of those special "DNR" spatial views ( ie. is implemented similar to a feature class). Column names may not match between SOILS_SV and the originating datasets. Use limitations

This Spatial View is available to Washingotn DNR users and those with access to the Washington State Uplands IMS site.

The following cautions only apply to one-to-many and many-to-many spatial views! Use these in the metadata only if the SV is one-to-many or many-to-many.

CAUTIONS: Area and Length Calculations: Use care when summarizing or totaling area or length calculations from spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships. One-to-many or many-to-many relationships between tabular and spatial data create multiple features in the same geometry. In other words, if there are two or more records in the table that correspond to the same feature (a single polygon, line or point), the spatial view will contain an identical copy of that feature's geometry for every corresponding record in the table. Area and length calculations should be performed carefully, to ensure they are not being exaggerated by including copies of the same feature's geometry.

Symbolizing Spatial Features:
Use care when symbolizing data in one-to-many or many-to-many spatial views. If there are multiple attributes tied to the same feature, symbolizing with a solid fill may mask other important features within the spatial view. This can be most commonly seen when symbolizing features based on a field with multiple table records.

Labeling Spatial Features: Spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships may present duplicate labels for those features with multiple table records. This is because there are multiple features in the same geometry, and each one receives a label.Soils Metadata

Scoggins Dam in northwest Oregon lies within the Gales Creek fault zone (GCF), a northwest-striking system of active faults forming the boundary between the Coast Range and the Tualatin Valley about 25 km east of Portland, Oregon. Geologic mapping published in 2020 shows the dam to lie within a block-faulted releasing stepover between the right-lateral, NW-striking Scoggins Creek and Parsons Creek strands of the GCF. The Scoggins Creek strand is presently mapped beneath the existing dam about 200 m north of the south abutment. Preliminary results from paleoseismic trenching by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Portland State University, and the U.S. Geological Survey indicate that these two major fault strands have had multiple surface rupturing earthquakes in the Holocene. To confirm the accuracy of the 2020 geologic map and the geometry of the GCF in the releasing stepover region, we completed additional geologic mapping of the dam, reservoir, and an alternative dam site downstrea ...

The Washington State Parcels Project provides a statewide data set of tax parcels attributes that cover those counties that currently have digital tax parcels. Attribute data has been normalized so that the field names are the same across all counties. The data set contains the tax parcel identification number, situs addresses, the Department of Revenue land use codes, improvement and land values, and a link to the county's assessor's website for parcel information (if it exists).

This map shows specific water-quality items and hydrologic data site information which come from QWDATA (Water Quality) and GWSI (Ground Water Information System). Both QWDATA and GWSI are subsystems of NWIS (National Water Inventory System)of the USGS (United States Geologic Survey). This map is for Washington County, Utah. The scope and purpose of NWIS is defined on the web site: http://water.usgs.gov/public/pubs/FS/FS-027-98/

The VA_TOWN dataset is a feature class component of the Virginia Administrative Boundaries dataset from the Virginia Geographic Information Network (VGIN). VA_COUNTY represents the best available city and county boundary information to VGIN.VGIN initially sought to develop an improved locality and town boundary dataset in late 2013, spurred by response of the Virginia Administrative Boundaries Workgroup community. The feature class initially started from the locality boundaries from the Census TIGER dataset for Virginia. VGIN solicited input from localities in Virginia through the Road Centerlines data submission process as well as through public forums such as the Virginia Administrative Boundaries Workgroup and VGIN listservs. Data received were analyzed and incorporated into the VA_COUNTY feature class where locality data were a superior representation of the city or county boundary.

© Virginia Geographic Information Network (VGIN), and the Census and Localities and Towns submitting data to the project

This layer is a component of Feature classes representing locality (county, city, and town) boundaries in the Commonwealth of Virginia..

This data consists of scanned maps of State Representative Districts; St. Louis County, including district 1, district 2, district 3, district 4, district 5, district 6, district 7, district 8, district 9; original map prepared in 1937 by the Works Progress Administration Project 6007; revised to Oct. 1952 by the St. Louis Planning Commission; drawn by J. Stillwell, Jan. 26, 1954; checked by D.E.B., Jan. 26, 1954

These files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the 1995 TIGER/Line files detailing water features. This dataset includes shorelines, streams, rivers, canals, ditches, aqueducts, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, bays, estuaries, gulfs, sounds, seas, oceans, gravel pits, and quarries. Both perennial and intermittent features are included.