3 datasets found
  1. d

    Data from: Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative...

    • search.dataone.org
    • datadryad.org
    Updated Apr 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Faye J. Thompson; Harry H. Marshall; Jennifer J. Sanderson; Emma I. K. Vitikainen; Hazel J. Nichols; Jason S. Gilchrist; Andrew J. Young; Sarah J. Hodge; Michael A. Cant (2025). Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8c26b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 1, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Faye J. Thompson; Harry H. Marshall; Jennifer J. Sanderson; Emma I. K. Vitikainen; Hazel J. Nichols; Jason S. Gilchrist; Andrew J. Young; Sarah J. Hodge; Michael A. Cant
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2016
    Description

    In many vertebrate societies, forced eviction of group members is an important determinant of population structure, but little is known about what triggers eviction. Three main explanations are (1) the reproductive competition hypothesis; (2) the coercion of cooperation hypothesis; and (3) the adaptive forced dispersal hypothesis. The last hypothesis proposes that dominant individuals use eviction as an adaptive strategy to propagate copies of their alleles through a highly structured population. We tested these hypotheses as explanations for eviction in cooperatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), using a 16-year dataset on life history, behaviour and relatedness. In this species, groups of females, or mixed-sex groups, are periodically evicted en masse. Our evidence suggests that reproductive competition is the main ultimate trigger for eviction for both sexes. We find little evidence that mass eviction is used to coerce helping, or as a mechanism to force dispersal of rela...

  2. Drone eviction assay raw data from Gilchrist et al for drone weights and...

    • zenodo.org
    • search.dataone.org
    • +2more
    bin
    Updated Mar 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brock Harpur; Brock Harpur (2024). Drone eviction assay raw data from Gilchrist et al for drone weights and eviction rates that have been treated with LPS or not [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4f4qrfjjw
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Brock Harpur; Brock Harpur
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Across the animal kingdom, males advertise their quality to potential mates. Males of low reproductive quality, such as those that are sick, may be excluded from mating. In eusocial species, there is some evidence that reproductive females gauge the quality of their mates. However, males often spend much more time with non-reproductive females as they are raised or, for some species, when they return from unsuccessful mating flights. Do non-reproductive workers evaluate the quality of male reproductives? Here we address this question using male honey bees (Apis mellifera), called drones, as a model. We generated immune-challenged drones by injecting them with lipopolysaccharide and tested: 1) do workers evict immune-challenged drones from their colony, 2) do cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles, body size, or mass change when drones are immune-challenged, and 3) are these changes used by workers to exclude low quality males from the colony? We found that an immune challenge causes changes in CHC profiles of drones and reduces their body mass. Workers selectively evict small and immune-challenged drones who, themselves, do not self-evict. This work demonstrates that some eusocial males undergo an additional layer of scrutiny prior to mating, one mediated by the nonreproductive worker caste.

  3. Data supporting Thompson et al. 2017 Individual and demographic consequences...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Oct 26, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Faye Thompson; Harry Marshall; Emma Vitikainen; andrew young; michael cant (2017). Data supporting Thompson et al. 2017 Individual and demographic consequences of mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5442178.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    figshare
    Authors
    Faye Thompson; Harry Marshall; Emma Vitikainen; andrew young; michael cant
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This data supports the following publication:Faye J. Thompson, Harry H. Marshall, Emma I.K. Vitikainen, Andrew J. Young & Michael A. Cant (2017) Individual and demographic consequences of mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses. Animal BehaviourPlease read the "Read Me.txt" file for a full description of the data contained in each data set

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Faye J. Thompson; Harry H. Marshall; Jennifer J. Sanderson; Emma I. K. Vitikainen; Hazel J. Nichols; Jason S. Gilchrist; Andrew J. Young; Sarah J. Hodge; Michael A. Cant (2025). Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8c26b

Data from: Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
Apr 1, 2025
Dataset provided by
Dryad Digital Repository
Authors
Faye J. Thompson; Harry H. Marshall; Jennifer J. Sanderson; Emma I. K. Vitikainen; Hazel J. Nichols; Jason S. Gilchrist; Andrew J. Young; Sarah J. Hodge; Michael A. Cant
Time period covered
Jan 1, 2016
Description

In many vertebrate societies, forced eviction of group members is an important determinant of population structure, but little is known about what triggers eviction. Three main explanations are (1) the reproductive competition hypothesis; (2) the coercion of cooperation hypothesis; and (3) the adaptive forced dispersal hypothesis. The last hypothesis proposes that dominant individuals use eviction as an adaptive strategy to propagate copies of their alleles through a highly structured population. We tested these hypotheses as explanations for eviction in cooperatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), using a 16-year dataset on life history, behaviour and relatedness. In this species, groups of females, or mixed-sex groups, are periodically evicted en masse. Our evidence suggests that reproductive competition is the main ultimate trigger for eviction for both sexes. We find little evidence that mass eviction is used to coerce helping, or as a mechanism to force dispersal of rela...

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu