Facebook
TwitterThere were public mass shootings in the United States in every year between 1998 and 2019, resulting in a total of almost 1,900 casualties. When compared with the number of victims of mass shootings in all other developed nations (based on UN specifications), the United States' figure is often higher than all of these countries combined. There were notable exceptions, such as the attacks in Paris on the evening of November 13. 2015, which resulted in 130 deaths and 416 injuries (the same year the Charlie Hebdo shooting killed 12 people and injured 11 more), the 2011 attacks in Oslo and Utøya, Norway and Liège, Belgium which had a combined casualty count of 240 due to gunfire. In the United States, the deadliest mass shooting in this time was the Las Vegas Strip massacre in 2017.
Facebook
TwitterAs of August 2025, California had the most mass shootings in the United States, with 26 total shootings since 1982. The source defines a mass shooting as a shooting where three or more people were killed. Recently, a mass shooting occurred in the state of Maine on October 26, 2023, during which one of the highest number of fatalities from a mass shooting was recorded after Robert Card opened fire in a bowling alley and a bar, killing 18 and injuring 13 others. Firearms in the U.S. Mass shootings in the United States are disturbingly common. In comparison with other Western countries, there are significantly more shootings in the U.S., which some theorize is due to the relatively lax gun control laws. Gun control laws in the U.S. are dependent on the state, and the right to own a firearm is enshrined in the United States Constitution. Mass shootings The worst mass shooting in the U.S. was the Las Vegas Strip massacre in 2017, which resulted in 58 deaths and 546 injuries. 13 of the worst mass shootings in the United States have occurred since 2015 and the vast majority of these incidents in the U.S. have been carried out by shooters who are White and male.
Facebook
TwitterTHIS DATASET WAS LAST UPDATED AT 7:11 AM EASTERN ON DEC. 1
2019 had the most mass killings since at least the 1970s, according to the Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings Database.
In all, there were 45 mass killings, defined as when four or more people are killed excluding the perpetrator. Of those, 33 were mass shootings . This summer was especially violent, with three high-profile public mass shootings occurring in the span of just four weeks, leaving 38 killed and 66 injured.
A total of 229 people died in mass killings in 2019.
The AP's analysis found that more than 50% of the incidents were family annihilations, which is similar to prior years. Although they are far less common, the 9 public mass shootings during the year were the most deadly type of mass murder, resulting in 73 people's deaths, not including the assailants.
One-third of the offenders died at the scene of the killing or soon after, half from suicides.
The Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings database tracks all U.S. homicides since 2006 involving four or more people killed (not including the offender) over a short period of time (24 hours) regardless of weapon, location, victim-offender relationship or motive. The database includes information on these and other characteristics concerning the incidents, offenders, and victims.
The AP/USA TODAY/Northeastern database represents the most complete tracking of mass murders by the above definition currently available. Other efforts, such as the Gun Violence Archive or Everytown for Gun Safety may include events that do not meet our criteria, but a review of these sites and others indicates that this database contains every event that matches the definition, including some not tracked by other organizations.
This data will be updated periodically and can be used as an ongoing resource to help cover these events.
To get basic counts of incidents of mass killings and mass shootings by year nationwide, use these queries:
To get these counts just for your state:
Mass murder is defined as the intentional killing of four or more victims by any means within a 24-hour period, excluding the deaths of unborn children and the offender(s). The standard of four or more dead was initially set by the FBI.
This definition does not exclude cases based on method (e.g., shootings only), type or motivation (e.g., public only), victim-offender relationship (e.g., strangers only), or number of locations (e.g., one). The time frame of 24 hours was chosen to eliminate conflation with spree killers, who kill multiple victims in quick succession in different locations or incidents, and to satisfy the traditional requirement of occurring in a “single incident.”
Offenders who commit mass murder during a spree (before or after committing additional homicides) are included in the database, and all victims within seven days of the mass murder are included in the victim count. Negligent homicides related to driving under the influence or accidental fires are excluded due to the lack of offender intent. Only incidents occurring within the 50 states and Washington D.C. are considered.
Project researchers first identified potential incidents using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR). Homicide incidents in the SHR were flagged as potential mass murder cases if four or more victims were reported on the same record, and the type of death was murder or non-negligent manslaughter.
Cases were subsequently verified utilizing media accounts, court documents, academic journal articles, books, and local law enforcement records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Each data point was corroborated by multiple sources, which were compiled into a single document to assess the quality of information.
In case(s) of contradiction among sources, official law enforcement or court records were used, when available, followed by the most recent media or academic source.
Case information was subsequently compared with every other known mass murder database to ensure reliability and validity. Incidents listed in the SHR that could not be independently verified were excluded from the database.
Project researchers also conducted extensive searches for incidents not reported in the SHR during the time period, utilizing internet search engines, Lexis-Nexis, and Newspapers.com. Search terms include: [number] dead, [number] killed, [number] slain, [number] murdered, [number] homicide, mass murder, mass shooting, massacre, rampage, family killing, familicide, and arson murder. Offender, victim, and location names were also directly searched when available.
This project started at USA TODAY in 2012.
Contact AP Data Editor Justin Myers with questions, suggestions or comments about this dataset at jmyers@ap.org. The Northeastern University researcher working with AP and USA TODAY is Professor James Alan Fox, who can be reached at j.fox@northeastern.edu or 617-416-4400.
Facebook
TwitterAs of August 11, there were four mass shootings in the United States in 2025. This is compared to one mass shooting in 1982, one in 2000, and 12 mass shootings in 2022 and 2023. School shootings The United States sees the most school shootings in the world. Some motivations for school shootings included depression, seeking revenge, and bullying. As a result of the large amount of school shootings, gun control has become a central topic in U.S. politics. This widespread problem happens across the United States; however California saw the highest number of K-12 school shootings in the United States since 1970. However, the deadliest school shooting (as of October 2023) was the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007. This tragedy left 33 dead and 23 injured. Mass shooting issues Mass shootings happen when there are several injuries or deaths from a firearm-related violence. Throughout the last century, mass shootings have become an epidemic in the United States. However, despite the increase in mass shootings and number of casualties, the U.S. government has done little to prevent future shootings from happening. As a result of the lack of cooperation in politics, mass shootings have become an important issue for Generation Z living in the United States. Furthermore, having the right to bear arms is a popular belief in the U.S. and the percentage of households in the United States owning at least one firearm has remained somewhat steady since 1972.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
1 in 4 mass shooting victims were children and teens. In the years between 2009 and 2020, the horrific scenes of mass shootings have haunted the nation’s collective conscience.US states with weaker gun laws and higher gun ownership rates have higher rates of mass shootings. Mass shooting is defined as any incident in which four or more people are shot and killed, excluding the shooter. The number of mass shootings that plague this country is far too high, and the counts are just a small fraction of the lives left forever changed after the tragedy of a mass shooting. So here is the data for list of mass shootings in United States from 2018 - 2022.
This dataset has five csv files of years 2018 - 2022. Each data contains following attributes
- Date : The date on which the mass shooting incident happened
- State : The state where the incident took place
- Dead : total number of people died in mass shooting
- Injured: total number of people who got injured in mass shooting-
- Total : total of dead and injured people
- Description : description/short report of the incident which may include information like gender/place etc.
Data for 2022 Mass shootings will be updated every 15 days!
This data was scraped from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States using BeautifulSoup.
Image banner by Wall Street Journal
Facebook
TwitterThe United States recorded *** school shootings between 2009 and 2018 - 57 times as many as occurred in the six other Group of Seven (G7) countries combined. The G7 countries with the next-highest number of school shootings were Canada and France, with two apiece.
Facebook
TwitterThe statistic shows the number of victims of the worst mass shootings in western democratic countries from 1966 to 2012. On December 14, 2012, a gunman killed 26 people - 20 of them children aged 5 to 10 - in a shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut. He committed suicide afterwards. Gun policy in the USA Over the last few years, mass shootings and accidents with children at shooting ranges have shaped national debates about the gun laws in the United States.
According to the Gallup survey across the United States in January 2014, 40 percent of the U.S. population stated they are totally satisfied with the existing gun laws in the United States, while 31 percent of the respondents stated they are dissatisfied, they want stricter laws.
The survey among American adults, which was conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2012 shortly after the Aurora movie theater shooting, on what they consider more important – the right to bear arms or controlling gun ownership, shows that 47 percent of the participants said the control of gun ownership is more important than the protection of the right to own guns.
The attitude towards gun control varies from generation to generation, 55 percent of the Millennials stated that controlling gun ownership is more important than protecting the gun rights, while 44 percent of the Silent generation stated the same.
The number of homicides by firearms has decreased over the last few years, 11,040 homicides by firearm were counted in 2003, while 9,960 homicides by firearm were counted in 2010. Homicide takes several forms, for example murder but homicide is not always a crime, it also includes affirmative defense, insanity, self-defense or the execution of convicted criminals.
America’s gun policy makes it possible for the American population to have a gun in their home on their own property, all U.S. states have imposed their own firearm restrictions. The percentage of Americans who have a gun in their home shifted from 40 percent in 1996 to 47 percent in 2011.
Facebook
TwitterBetween 1982 and August 2025, 84 out of the 155 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was Black in 26 mass shootings and Latino in 12. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 54 percent, 17 percent, and eight percent, respectively. Race of mass shooters reflects the U.S. population Broadly speaking, the racial distribution of mass shootings mirrors the racial distribution of the U.S. population as a whole. While a superficial comparison of the statistics seems to suggest African American shooters are over-represented and Latino shooters underrepresented, the fact that the shooter’s race is unclear in around nine percent of cases, along with the different time frames over which these statistics are calculated, means no such conclusions should be drawn. Conversely, looking at the mass shootings in the United States by gender clearly demonstrates that the majority of mass shootings are carried out by men. Mass shootings and mental health With no clear patterns between the socio-economic or cultural background of mass shooters, increasing attention has been placed on mental health. Analysis of the factors Americans considered to be to blame for mass shootings showed 80 percent of people felt the inability of the mental health system to recognize those who pose a danger to others was a significant factor. This concern is not without merit – in over half of the mass shootings since 1982, the shooter showed prior signs of mental health issues, suggesting improved mental health services may help deal with this horrific problem. Mass shootings and guns In the wake of multiple mass shootings, critics have sought to look beyond the issues of shooter identification and their influences by focusing on their access to guns. The majority of mass shootings in the U.S. involve firearms which were obtained legally, reflecting the easy ability of Americans to purchase and carry deadly weapons in public. Gun control takes on a particular significance when the uniquely American phenomenon of school shootings is considered. The annual number of incidents involving firearms at K-12 schools in the U.S. was over 100 in each year since 2018. Conversely, similar incidents in other developed countries exceptionally rare, with only five school shootings in G7 countries other than the U.S. between 2009 and 2018.
Facebook
TwitterNumber and percentage of homicide victims, by type of firearm used to commit the homicide (total firearms; handgun; rifle or shotgun; fully automatic firearm; sawed-off rifle or shotgun; firearm-like weapons; other firearms, type unknown), Canada, 1974 to 2018.
Facebook
TwitterThe deadliest school shooting in the United States as of August 11, 2025, was the Virginia Tech massacre, with 32 fatalities and 23 injuries. The next deadliest school shooting (based on fatalities) was the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, with 27 fatalities. School shootings in the U.S. Mass shootings in the United States have become a disturbingly common occurrence, and sadly, so have school shootings. The Columbine school shooting is perhaps the most famous in the country’s history, and since 1999 (when the shooting occurred), the number of school shootings has only increased. Many measures have been used to try to prevent school shootings, including security guards and metal detectors being deployed in schools, and even the suggestion that teachers be allowed to carry guns in schools. Gun control Gun control in the United States is a sticky issue, since gun ownership is enshrined in the Constitution. Some advocate for stricter gun control laws to try to prevent future mass shootings, while others say that this is unconstitutional. Gun ownership rates in the U.S. are high, with the share of American households owning at least one firearm remaining relatively steady since 1972.
Facebook
TwitterAs of June 19, 116 school shooting incidents were recorded in K-12 schools in the United States in 2025. Within the provided time period, the greatest number of K-12 school shootings was recorded in 2023, at 350. The source defines a school shooting as every time a gun is brandished, fired, or a bullet hits school property for any reason, regardless of the number of victims (including zero), time, day or the week, or reason, including gang shootings, domestic violence, shootings at sports games and after hours school events, suicides, fights that escalate into shootings, and accidents.
Facebook
TwitterI often hear my fellow Americans say things like "There's no way I'm going to Europe given all of the terrorism" despite living in a country with mass shootings on a nearly daily basis. I was curious as to what the facts said - are Americans in more danger from other Americans vs Europeans from terrorists. This is the dataset for the terror half of the question.
This dataset contains information about worldwide terrorism events back to 1970, including location, circumstances, number of casualties, weapons used, etc. For a full description reference the codebook: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/downloads/Codebook.pdf
This open-source dataset is provided courtesy of the University of Maryland START (https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/).
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). (2016). Global Terrorism Database [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
Besides comparing to US gun violence, I'd like to correlate terrorism in countries/regions with other factors (economics, internet spread, etc.).
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Active Shooter Training market size reached USD 2.13 billion in 2024, with a robust year-over-year momentum. The market is forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 8.9% from 2025 to 2033, projecting a value of USD 4.61 billion by the end of the forecast period. This growth trajectory is primarily driven by an escalating demand for workplace and public safety solutions, heightened awareness of security threats, and the increasing adoption of comprehensive preparedness programs across multiple sectors. As organizations globally prioritize employee and stakeholder safety, the need for effective active shooter training programs continues to surge, shaping the future landscape of this critical market.
One of the primary growth factors fueling the expansion of the Active Shooter Training market is the rising frequency of mass shooting incidents worldwide. High-profile events across educational institutions, corporate environments, healthcare facilities, and public venues have underscored the urgent necessity for proactive preparedness and rapid response strategies. As a result, organizations are increasingly investing in tailored training modules that equip individuals and teams with the skills and confidence to respond effectively during active shooter scenarios. This heightened awareness has led to the integration of advanced technologies, such as simulation-based learning, virtual reality, and scenario-driven drills, further enhancing the efficacy and engagement of training programs. The combination of real-world incidents and technological innovation is creating a fertile environment for the sustained growth of the active shooter training industry.
Another significant driver is the evolving regulatory landscape and the introduction of stringent compliance mandates across various sectors. Governments and regulatory bodies in regions such as North America and Europe are progressively mandating active shooter preparedness as part of occupational health and safety requirements. Educational institutions, healthcare providers, and corporate entities are now subject to rigorous standards, compelling them to adopt certified training solutions. This regulatory push, combined with increasing corporate social responsibility initiatives, is encouraging organizations to go beyond minimal compliance and invest in comprehensive, scenario-based training approaches. The convergence of legal requirements and ethical considerations is thus propelling the adoption of active shooter training solutions on a global scale.
Furthermore, the proliferation of digital learning platforms and hybrid training models is democratizing access to active shooter preparedness programs. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the shift toward remote and blended learning, prompting training providers to develop scalable online modules and interactive e-learning resources. These digital offerings are enabling organizations of all sizes, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), to implement cost-effective training initiatives without the logistical constraints of traditional on-site sessions. As hybrid work environments become the norm, the flexibility and accessibility of online and hybrid training solutions are expected to play a pivotal role in driving market growth, particularly in emerging economies where in-person training infrastructure may be limited.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Active Shooter Training market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024, owing to the high incidence of mass shootings and robust regulatory frameworks. However, Europe and Asia Pacific are rapidly emerging as key growth regions, fueled by increasing government initiatives, heightened public awareness, and the adoption of innovative training technologies. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady growth, albeit from a smaller base, as organizations in these regions recognize the importance of workplace safety and emergency preparedness. The global nature of security threats and the universal imperative for safety are ensuring a broad-based expansion of the active shooter training market across all major geographies.
The Active Shooter Training market is segmented by training type into on-site training, online training, and hybrid training, each catering to distinct organizational needs and learning preferenc
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Gunshot Detection for Schools market size reached USD 1.15 billion in 2024, driven by heightened concerns over school safety and the increasing frequency of firearm-related incidents in educational institutions. The market is anticipated to grow at a robust CAGR of 18.2% during the forecast period, with the market size projected to reach USD 5.28 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is underpinned by the urgent demand for advanced security solutions that can offer real-time alerts and rapid response capabilities, thereby minimizing casualties and enhancing the overall safety framework in schools worldwide.
One of the primary growth drivers for the Gunshot Detection for Schools market is the rising incidence of gun-related violence and mass shootings in educational settings, especially in North America and parts of Europe. School administrators, government agencies, and local municipalities are under increasing pressure to implement robust security measures that can detect, localize, and respond to active shooter situations instantly. As a result, there has been a significant surge in both public and private investments in gunshot detection technologies, particularly those that integrate seamlessly with existing security infrastructure such as surveillance cameras and access control systems. The heightened awareness among parents, educators, and policymakers regarding the devastating impact of school shootings is further propelling the adoption of advanced gunshot detection solutions across K-12 schools and higher education institutions.
Another critical factor fueling market expansion is the continuous evolution and sophistication of gunshot detection technologies. Innovations in acoustic and infrared sensors, coupled with advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, have significantly improved the accuracy, speed, and reliability of gunshot detection systems. These technological advancements have reduced the occurrence of false alarms, enabled precise localization of gunshots, and facilitated seamless integration with emergency response protocols. The growing trend of incorporating cloud-based platforms and real-time data analytics into gunshot detection systems is also enhancing their scalability and effectiveness, making them an indispensable component of modern school safety strategies.
The increasing support from governmental bodies and regulatory agencies is also playing a pivotal role in driving the Gunshot Detection for Schools market. Many countries are introducing stringent safety standards and providing funding or grants to encourage the deployment of advanced security solutions in educational institutions. In the United States, for instance, several federal and state-level initiatives are focused on improving school safety through the adoption of cutting-edge technologies, including gunshot detection systems. This regulatory push, combined with growing partnerships between technology providers, law enforcement agencies, and school districts, is expected to sustain the market’s upward trajectory in the coming years.
From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Gunshot Detection for Schools market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The high prevalence of school shootings, strong regulatory frameworks, and proactive adoption of security technologies in the United States and Canada are the key factors contributing to the region’s leadership position. Europe is also witnessing steady growth, driven by increasing government focus on school safety and the implementation of supportive policies. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is expected to register the fastest CAGR during the forecast period, fueled by rising investments in educational infrastructure, growing awareness of campus security, and the gradual adoption of advanced security solutions in countries such as Japan, Australia, and China.
The Gunshot Detection for Schools market, when analyzed by product type, comprises Indoor Gunshot Detection Systems, Outdoor Gunshot Detection Systems, and Hybrid Systems. Indoor gunshot detection systems are specifically designed for enclosed environments such as classrooms, corridors, gymnasiums, and auditoriums. These systems utilize advanced sensors and acoustic algorithms to accurately detect gunshots within confi
Facebook
TwitterAs of July 14, 2025, there have been a total of 277 school shootings in California since 1966, the most out of any state. Texas had the second highest number of school shootings within this time period, with 237 shootings. The source defines a school shooting as every time a gun is brandished, fired, or a bullet hits school property for any reason, regardless of the number of victims (including zero), time, day or the week, or reason, including gang shootings, domestic violence, shootings at sports games and after hours school events, suicides, fights that escalate into shootings, and accidents.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Active Assailant Insurance market size in 2024 stands at USD 1.12 billion, with robust growth drivers pushing the sector forward. The market is expected to register a CAGR of 21.6% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a forecasted value of USD 8.16 billion by 2033. This significant growth trajectory is primarily attributed to the increasing frequency of violent incidents and mass shootings worldwide, heightened awareness of organizational risk exposure, and the evolving landscape of liability and crisis management requirements.
One of the primary growth factors for the Active Assailant Insurance market is the alarming rise in active assailant events, such as mass shootings and violent attacks, across various public and private spaces. Organizations, including educational institutions, healthcare facilities, and commercial enterprises, are increasingly recognizing the need for comprehensive insurance solutions to mitigate the financial, reputational, and operational risks associated with these unpredictable incidents. As a result, there is a marked increase in demand for specialized coverage types, such as physical damage, business interruption, liability, and crisis management services. This heightened demand is further fueled by regulatory scrutiny and the need for organizations to demonstrate preparedness and compliance in the face of evolving security threats. Insurers are responding by developing tailored policies that address the unique challenges posed by active assailant scenarios, thus expanding the market’s reach and depth.
Another significant growth driver is the expansion of the end-user base for Active Assailant Insurance. While educational institutions and healthcare facilities remain prominent purchasers due to their vulnerability and public-facing nature, there is a growing uptake among commercial enterprises, religious organizations, and government entities. These organizations are increasingly aware of the potential legal liabilities and operational disruptions that can arise from active assailant events. The broadening of the end-user spectrum is also supported by heightened media attention on high-profile incidents, which amplifies the perceived need for comprehensive risk management solutions. Additionally, advancements in risk assessment tools and data analytics enable insurers to offer more accurate pricing and coverage, making these policies more accessible and attractive to a wider range of clients.
The evolution of distribution channels is also playing a crucial role in market growth. The proliferation of digital platforms and the increasing role of brokers and agents are making it easier for organizations to access and compare active assailant insurance products. Online platforms, in particular, are streamlining the policy acquisition process, offering educational resources, and facilitating claims management. This digital transformation is not only increasing market penetration but also enhancing customer experience and satisfaction. Furthermore, the competitive landscape is driving innovation in product offerings, with insurers introducing value-added services such as crisis management consulting, emergency response planning, and post-incident support. These integrated solutions are resonating with organizations seeking comprehensive risk mitigation strategies, thereby fueling further market expansion.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Active Assailant Insurance market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, driven by a high incidence of active assailant events, stringent regulatory frameworks, and a mature insurance sector. Europe follows, with increasing adoption among educational and commercial entities, particularly in countries with heightened security concerns. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, supported by rising awareness, urbanization, and the expansion of multinational enterprises. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging markets, with gradual uptake as organizations in these regions become more cognizant of the risks and benefits associated with active assailant insurance. This regional diversification is expected to continue, with insurers tailoring products to meet the specific needs and regulatory environments of each market.
Th
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/policies.html#TermsOfAccesshttps://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/policies.html#TermsOfAccess
This is a timeline of worldwide school shootings that supports the chapter entitled "Getting back to a “new normal”: Grief leadership after a fatal school shooting.
Abstract Violence in educational institutions compounds and accumulates in our collective memory, as school shootings have become a ubiquitous phenomenon. When a young man carrying three guns entered Dawson College in Montréal, the downtown core came to a standstill. As bullets sprayed and ricocheted, one young woman was killed, 19 others wounded, and a community of 10,000 students, teachers and staff were traumatized. This research employed a qualitative methodology, interviewing ten senior administrators and managers in-depth. Findings document the salient role grief leadership played in restoring balance and an educational focus in the wake of a shooting on campus and served to reshape the community into one of learning, resilience, and courage. It details specific actions taken by administrators, which promoted healing and re-established equilibrium at a site of grief, loss and terror. Administrative responses proved essential in helping to re-establish thriving at Dawson College.
Facebook
TwitterFrom 2008 to April 25, 2025, the District of Columbia had the highest rate of school shootings nationwide, totaling around **** school shootings per 100,000 residents. Louisiana, Delaware, Maryland, and Alabama rounded out the top five states with the highest school shooting rates relative to their populations. In contrast, there were no school shootings recorded in Montana, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Rhode Island within the provided time period. In addition to K-12 schools and college campuses, gun-related violence in the United States often occurs at workplaces, places of worship, and restaurants and bars. The source defines school shootings as incidents of gun violence which occurred on school property, from kindergartens through colleges/universities, and at least one person was shot, not including the shooter. School property includes, but is not limited to, buildings, fields, parking lots, stadiums and buses. Accidental discharges of firearms are included, as long as at least one person is shot, but not if the sole shooter is law enforcement or school security.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global Gunshot Detection Analytics Platforms market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, driven by increasing urban safety concerns and advancements in real-time surveillance technologies. The market is poised to grow at a robust CAGR of 17.2% from 2025 to 2033, with the total market value projected to reach USD 5.01 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily attributed to rising investments in smart city infrastructure, heightened security requirements across public and private sectors, and the integration of artificial intelligence with acoustic analytics for enhanced gunshot detection accuracy.
A key growth factor for the Gunshot Detection Analytics Platforms market is the escalating incidence of gun-related violence and mass shooting events worldwide, particularly in urban environments. Municipalities and law enforcement agencies are under mounting pressure to deploy advanced surveillance systems capable of providing real-time alerts and actionable intelligence. Gunshot detection platforms, leveraging acoustic sensors and sophisticated analytics, enable rapid response to active shooter incidents, thereby reducing response times and potentially saving lives. The public’s growing demand for safer communities is pushing governments to allocate significant budgets towards these technologies, fostering a favorable environment for market expansion.
Another significant driver is the technological evolution in sensor networks and data analytics, which has markedly improved the detection accuracy and reliability of these platforms. The integration of machine learning algorithms, edge computing, and cloud-based analytics allows for the differentiation of gunshots from other impulsive noises, minimizing false alarms and optimizing resource allocation for emergency responders. The proliferation of IoT devices and the adoption of 5G networks further enhance the capabilities of gunshot detection systems, enabling seamless data transmission and real-time situational awareness across multiple locations. These technological advancements are not only improving system performance but also reducing operational costs, making these solutions more accessible to a broader range of end-users.
Furthermore, the expansion of gunshot detection analytics platforms into commercial, industrial, and critical infrastructure sectors is fueling market growth beyond traditional law enforcement applications. Private enterprises, educational institutions, and transportation hubs are increasingly recognizing the value of proactive threat detection to protect assets, personnel, and customers. The rise of integrated security ecosystems, where gunshot detection is combined with video surveillance, access control, and emergency notification systems, is creating new revenue streams for market participants. This diversification of application areas is expected to sustain high demand for gunshot detection analytics platforms over the forecast period.
Regionally, North America dominates the Gunshot Detection Analytics Platforms market, accounting for the largest share in 2024 due to the high prevalence of gun violence, stringent regulatory mandates, and substantial public safety investments. Europe follows, with increasing adoption in the United Kingdom, Germany, and France, driven by urban safety initiatives and counter-terrorism efforts. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth, propelled by smart city projects in countries like China, India, and Singapore. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging markets, gradually integrating these platforms to address rising security concerns in urban and industrial areas. Each region presents unique challenges and opportunities, shaped by local regulatory frameworks, infrastructure readiness, and security priorities.
The Gunshot Detection Analytics Platforms market is segmented by component into Software, Hardware, and Services
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
As of 2023, the global gun detection system market size is valued at approximately USD 1.1 billion and is projected to reach USD 3.5 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 13.5%. The rapid growth of this market is primarily driven by increasing concerns regarding public safety and security, combined with advancements in technology that enhance the efficiency and accuracy of gun detection systems. One of the primary factors contributing to this growth is the escalating incidence of mass shootings and terrorist activities, which have necessitated the adoption of more sophisticated surveillance and detection mechanisms.
The surge in demand for advanced security solutions in public spaces such as schools, airports, and commercial buildings is a significant growth factor for the gun detection system market. Governments and private institutions are increasingly investing in state-of-the-art technologies to preemptively address potential threats. Furthermore, the advent of AI and machine learning has revolutionized gun detection systems, enabling more accurate and quicker threat assessments. These technological advancements have not only improved the functionality of these systems but also made them more accessible and cost-effective, thereby driving market growth.
Another critical driver for market expansion is the increasing legislative support for security enhancements across various sectors. Governments worldwide are implementing stringent regulations mandating the installation of gun detection systems in sensitive areas. For instance, several countries have introduced policies and grants to encourage educational institutions to adopt these technologies, thereby fueling market growth. In addition, the increasing collaboration between private companies and government bodies for the development and deployment of advanced gun detection solutions is further propelling the market.
The growing awareness and emphasis on homeland security also play a pivotal role in the expansion of the gun detection system market. With rising global geopolitical tensions and the constant threat of terrorist activities, there is an imperative need to strengthen security measures. Advanced gun detection systems are increasingly being integrated into national defense mechanisms, border security, and critical infrastructure protection. This heightened focus on homeland security is expected to significantly boost the market in the coming years.
Gunshot Detection technology has emerged as a pivotal component in enhancing public safety and security. This technology utilizes a network of acoustic sensors to detect and locate gunfire incidents in real-time. By analyzing the unique sound signatures of gunshots, these systems can provide immediate alerts to law enforcement agencies, enabling rapid response to potential threats. The integration of Gunshot Detection technology into urban security frameworks is becoming increasingly common, as cities worldwide seek to address the growing concerns of gun-related violence. This proactive approach not only aids in the swift apprehension of offenders but also acts as a deterrent to criminal activities, thereby contributing to safer communities.
Regionally, North America dominates the gun detection system market due to the high incidence of gun-related violence and robust government initiatives aimed at enhancing public safety. The presence of major technology providers and increased spending on security infrastructure further bolster this region's market share. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness substantial growth, driven by rising urbanization, increasing disposable incomes, and heightened security concerns in countries such as India and China. Europe and Latin America are also expected to show steady growth owing to enhanced security measures and technological advancements.
The gun detection system market can be segmented by component into hardware, software, and services. The hardware segment includes sensors, cameras, and other physical devices essential for detecting firearms. This segment is crucial as it forms the backbone of any detection system, ensuring the effective identification of threats. Continuous advancements in sensor technology, such as the development of high-resolution cameras and sophisticated acoustic sensors, have significantly enhanced the efficacy of gun detection hardware. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on integrating AI capabilities
Facebook
TwitterThere were public mass shootings in the United States in every year between 1998 and 2019, resulting in a total of almost 1,900 casualties. When compared with the number of victims of mass shootings in all other developed nations (based on UN specifications), the United States' figure is often higher than all of these countries combined. There were notable exceptions, such as the attacks in Paris on the evening of November 13. 2015, which resulted in 130 deaths and 416 injuries (the same year the Charlie Hebdo shooting killed 12 people and injured 11 more), the 2011 attacks in Oslo and Utøya, Norway and Liège, Belgium which had a combined casualty count of 240 due to gunfire. In the United States, the deadliest mass shooting in this time was the Las Vegas Strip massacre in 2017.