This table will no longer be updated after 5/30/2024 given the end of the 2023-2024 viral respiratory vaccine season. This table shows the number of CT residents who received an updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination by week and age group (current age). Only the first dose is counted. CDC recommends that people get at least one dose of this vaccine to protect against serious illness, whether or not they have had a COVID-19 vaccination before. Children and people with moderate to severe immunosuppression might be recommended more than one dose. For more information on COVID-19 vaccination recommendations, click here. • Data are reported weekly on Thursday and include doses administered to Saturday of the previous week (Sunday – Saturday). All data in this report are preliminary. Data from the previous week may be changed because of delays in reporting, deduplication, or correction of errors. • These analyses are based on data reported to CT WiZ which is the immunization information system for CT. CT providers are required by law to report all doses of vaccine administered. CT WiZ also receives records on CT residents vaccinated in other jurisdictions and by federal entities which share data with CT Wiz electronically. Electronic data exchange is being added jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. Currently, this includes Rhode Island and New York City but not Massachusetts and New York State. Therefore, doses administered to CT residents in neighboring towns in Massachusetts and New York State will not be included. A full list of the jurisdiction with which CT has established electronic data exchange can be seen at the bottom of this page (https://portal.ct.gov/immunization/Knowledge-Base/Articles/Vaccine-Providers/CT-WiZ-for-Vaccine-Providers-and-Training/Query-and-Response-functionality-in-CT-WiZ?language=en_US) • People are included if they have an active jurisdictional status in CT WiZ at the time weekly data are pulled. This excludes people who live out of state, are deceased and a small percentage who have opted out of CT WiZ.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Morocco MA: Immunization: Measles: % of Children Aged 12-23 Months data was reported at 99.000 % in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 99.000 % for 2015. Morocco MA: Immunization: Measles: % of Children Aged 12-23 Months data is updated yearly, averaging 92.000 % from Dec 1982 (Median) to 2016, with 35 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 99.000 % in 2016 and a record low of 17.000 % in 1982. Morocco MA: Immunization: Measles: % of Children Aged 12-23 Months data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Morocco – Table MA.World Bank: Health Statistics. Child immunization, measles, measures the percentage of children ages 12-23 months who received the measles vaccination before 12 months or at any time before the survey. A child is considered adequately immunized against measles after receiving one dose of vaccine.; ; WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/).; Weighted average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Morocco MA: Immunization: HepB3: % of One-Year-Old Children data was reported at 99.000 % in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 99.000 % for 2015. Morocco MA: Immunization: HepB3: % of One-Year-Old Children data is updated yearly, averaging 96.500 % from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 99.000 % in 2016 and a record low of 10.000 % in 1999. Morocco MA: Immunization: HepB3: % of One-Year-Old Children data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Morocco – Table MA.World Bank: Health Statistics. Child immunization rate, hepatitis B is the percentage of children ages 12-23 months who received hepatitis B vaccinations before 12 months or at any time before the survey. A child is considered adequately immunized after three doses.; ; WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/).; Weighted average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundCanine transmitted rabies kills an estimated 59,000 people annually, despite proven methods for elimination through mass dog vaccination. Challenges in directing and monitoring numerous remote vaccination teams across large geographic areas remain a significant barrier to the up-scaling of focal vaccination programmes to sub-national and national level. Smartphone technology (mHealth) is increasingly being used to enhance the coordination and efficiency of public health initiatives in developing countries, however examples of successful scaling beyond pilot implementation are rare. This study describes a smartphone app and website platform, “Mission Rabies App”, used to co-ordinate rabies control activities at project sites in four continents to vaccinate over one million dogs.MethodsMission Rabies App made it possible to not only gather relevant campaign data from the field, but also to direct vaccination teams systematically in near real-time. The display of user-allocated boundaries on Google maps within data collection forms enabled a project manager to define each team’s region of work, assess their output and assign subsequent areas to progressively vaccinate across a geographic area. This ability to monitor work and react to a rapidly changing situation has the potential to improve efficiency and coverage achieved, compared to regular project management structures, as well as enhancing capacity for data review and analysis from remote areas. The ability to plot the location of every vaccine administered facilitated engagement with stakeholders through transparent reporting, and has the potential to motivate politicians to support such activities.ResultsSince the system launched in September 2014, over 1.5 million data entries have been made to record dog vaccinations, rabies education classes and field surveys in 16 countries. Use of the system has increased year-on-year with adoption for mass dog vaccination campaigns at the India state level in Goa and national level in Haiti.ConclusionsInnovative approaches to rapidly scale mass dog vaccination programmes in a sustained and systematic fashion are urgently needed to achieve the WHO, OIE and FAO goal to eliminate canine-transmitted human deaths by 2030. The Mission Rabies App is an mHealth innovation which greatly reduces the logistical and managerial barriers to implementing large scale rabies control activities. Free access to the platform aims to support pilot campaigns to better structure and report on proof-of-concept initiatives, clearly presenting outcomes and opportunities for expansion. The functionalities of the Mission Rabies App may also be beneficial to other infectious disease interventions.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: No data was reported at 77.600 % in 11 Apr 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 73.900 % for 04 Apr 2022. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: No data is updated weekly, averaging 72.700 % from Nov 2021 (Median) to 11 Apr 2022, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 77.600 % in 11 Apr 2022 and a record low of 65.500 % in 03 Jan 2022. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.S049: Small Business Pulse Survey: by State: Northeast Region: Weekly, Beg Monday (Discontinued).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In these analyses, individuals vaccinated before the identified time duration considered unvaccinatedModel A: Adjusted for age, gender, place of residence;**Model B: Adjusted for Model A variables plus income, comorbidity, A(H1N1)pdm09 priority group, receiving the 2009/10 seasonal influenza vaccine, receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, immunosuppressed, pregnancy, ≥20 physician encounters in the last 5 years, ≥1 hospital admission in the last 5 years; use of antiviral prophylaxis and diagnosis of chronic renal failure.† Exact numbers between 1–5 are not reported as required by the data custodian to protect patient confidentiality.Estimates of the effectiveness (VE) of pandemic, seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccine against hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed influenza*.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: N/A data was reported at 13.200 % in 11 Apr 2022. This records a decrease from the previous number of 14.100 % for 04 Apr 2022. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: N/A data is updated weekly, averaging 14.050 % from Nov 2021 (Median) to 11 Apr 2022, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 19.100 % in 14 Mar 2022 and a record low of 9.000 % in 22 Nov 2021. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Proof of COVID Vaccination: N/A data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.S049: Small Business Pulse Survey: by State: Northeast Region: Weekly, Beg Monday (Discontinued).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Poisson model of individual- and zip code-level factors associated with receipt of primary COVID-19 vaccination series and booster.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Absolute increase in the school population immunity following the mass campaign by vaccination status before the campaign.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Measles vaccine coverage before the outbreak in May 2011 and after the mass vaccination campaign in September 2013 and number of students vaccinated during the outbreak and during and after the vaccination campaign.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Negative COVID Test: No data was reported at 80.500 % in 11 Apr 2022. This records a decrease from the previous number of 80.700 % for 04 Apr 2022. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Negative COVID Test: No data is updated weekly, averaging 76.450 % from Nov 2021 (Median) to 11 Apr 2022, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 82.800 % in 15 Nov 2021 and a record low of 66.100 % in 10 Jan 2022. United States SB: MA: COVID Test/Vaccine: Negative COVID Test: No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.S049: Small Business Pulse Survey: by State: Northeast Region: Weekly, Beg Monday (Discontinued).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Characteristics of individuals receiving a booster vaccination.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Characteristics of individuals completing the primary series.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Participation in the telephone survey and proportion of unvaccinated students per subgroup and in the student population.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Age at first dose of measles vaccine and vaccine coverage among elementary students, high school students and the whole student population according to the geographic area of residence in May 2011, before the outbreak.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Morocco MA: Newborns Protected Against Tetanus data was reported at 90.000 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 88.000 % for 2015. Morocco MA: Newborns Protected Against Tetanus data is updated yearly, averaging 83.000 % from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 35 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 90.000 % in 2016 and a record low of 29.000 % in 1987. Morocco MA: Newborns Protected Against Tetanus data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Morocco – Table MA.World Bank: Health Statistics. Newborns protected against tetanus are the percentage of births by women of child-bearing age who are immunized against tetanus.; ; WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/).; Weighted average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cumulative incidence and crude incidence rate of AESIs among second dose recipients of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 from 23 February to 9 September 2021 in Hong Kong SAR, China.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Incidence rate ratio of AESIs among first dose and second dose recipients of CoronaVac versus BNT162b2 as the reference category (after weighting).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cumulative incidence and crude incidence rate of AESIs among first dose recipients of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 from 23 February to 9 September 2021 in Hong Kong SAR, China.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The growth of the poultry industry in Nigeria is constrained by major poultry diseases, despite the implementation of vaccination programs. This study aimed to assess the level of protection against Newcastle disease (ND), infectious bursal disease (IBD), and avian infectious bronchitis (IB) afforded by current vaccination schedules and characterize the circulating virus strains in commercial poultry flocks in Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 44 commercial poultry farms in Oyo and Kano states of Nigeria. Serum and tissue samples and data on flock, clinical and vaccination records were collected on each farm. Farms were classified as being protected or not protected against ND, IBD and IB based on a defined criterion. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing was performed for each target virus on tissue samples and positive samples were sequenced. A total of 15/44 (34.1%), 35/44 (79.5%), and 1/44 (2.3%) farms were considered to be protected against ND, IBD, and IB, respectively, at the time of sampling. NDV RNA was detected on 7/44 (15.9%) farms and sequences obtained from 3/7 farms were characterized as the lentogenic strain. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) RNA was detected on 16/44 (36.4%) farms tested; very virulent (vv) IBDV and non-virulent (nv) IBDV strains were both detected in 3/16 (18.8%) positive samples. Sequences of IBDV isolates were either clustered with a group of genotype 3 virulent IBDV strains or were related to vaccine strains MB and D78 strains. IBV RNA was detected on 36/44 (81.8%) farms, with variant02, Massachusetts, 4/91, and Q1 variants detected. Sequences of IBV isolates were either clustered with the vaccines strains Massachusetts M41 and H120 or were most closely related to the D274-like strains or a clade of sequences reported in Nigeria and Niger in 2006 and 2007. This study revealed that most study farms in Oyo and Kano states did not have adequate protective antibody titers against IBV and NDV and were therefore at risk of field challenge. Infectious bursal disease virus and IBV RNA were detected on farms with a history of vaccination suggesting potential vaccination failure, or that the vaccine strains used mismatch with the circulating strains and are therefore not protective.
This table will no longer be updated after 5/30/2024 given the end of the 2023-2024 viral respiratory vaccine season. This table shows the number of CT residents who received an updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination by week and age group (current age). Only the first dose is counted. CDC recommends that people get at least one dose of this vaccine to protect against serious illness, whether or not they have had a COVID-19 vaccination before. Children and people with moderate to severe immunosuppression might be recommended more than one dose. For more information on COVID-19 vaccination recommendations, click here. • Data are reported weekly on Thursday and include doses administered to Saturday of the previous week (Sunday – Saturday). All data in this report are preliminary. Data from the previous week may be changed because of delays in reporting, deduplication, or correction of errors. • These analyses are based on data reported to CT WiZ which is the immunization information system for CT. CT providers are required by law to report all doses of vaccine administered. CT WiZ also receives records on CT residents vaccinated in other jurisdictions and by federal entities which share data with CT Wiz electronically. Electronic data exchange is being added jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. Currently, this includes Rhode Island and New York City but not Massachusetts and New York State. Therefore, doses administered to CT residents in neighboring towns in Massachusetts and New York State will not be included. A full list of the jurisdiction with which CT has established electronic data exchange can be seen at the bottom of this page (https://portal.ct.gov/immunization/Knowledge-Base/Articles/Vaccine-Providers/CT-WiZ-for-Vaccine-Providers-and-Training/Query-and-Response-functionality-in-CT-WiZ?language=en_US) • People are included if they have an active jurisdictional status in CT WiZ at the time weekly data are pulled. This excludes people who live out of state, are deceased and a small percentage who have opted out of CT WiZ.