This dataset provides comprehensive information about various Data Science and Analytics master's programs offered in the United States. It includes details such as the program name, university name, annual tuition fees, program duration, location of the university, and additional information about the programs.

Column Descriptions:

• Subject Name: The name or field of study of the master's program, such as Data Science, Data Analytics, or Applied Biostatistics.

• University Name: The name of the university offering the master's program.

• Per Year Fees: The tuition fees for the program, usually given in euros per year. For some programs, the fees may be listed as "full" or "full-time," indicating a lump sum for the entire program or for full-time enrollment, respectively.

• About Program: A brief description or overview of the master's program, providing insights into its curriculum, focus areas, and any unique features.

• Program Duration: The duration of the master's program, typically expressed in years or months.

• University Location: The location of the university where the program is offered, including the city and state.

• Program Name: The official name of the master's program, often indicating its degree type (e.g., M.Sc. for Master of Science) and format (e.g., full-time, part-time, online).

A file that holds the master records for all online training courses nominated for reimbursement.

Key indicators of broadband adoption, service and infrastructure in New York City. Data Limitations: Data accuracy is limited as of the date of publication and by the methodology and accuracy of the original sources. The City shall not be liable for any costs related to, or in reliance of, the data contained in these datasets.

Users can view summary reports and interact with the databset to obtain information regarding registered nonprofit organizations on a state and national level. Topics include: registered nonprofit organizations, public charities, and private foundations in the United States and per state. Background The National Center for Charitable Statistics, managed by the Urban Institute, provides data on the nonprofit sector in the United States. Topics include registered nonprofit organizations, public charities and private foundations in the United States. User Functionality Users can view summary reports regarding the number and type of registered nonprofit organizations, public charities and private foundations in the U.S. and individual states. In additi on to viewing reports, users can also interact with several online analysis tools to view data on specific types of nonprofits and view in-depth state profiles. Users can purchase the dataset, or specific variables within the dataset for further analysis. The dataset can be downloaded into dbase, SAS, or SPSS statistical software or Microsoft Excel. Data Notes Statistics are derived from the Internal Revenue Service Master File. Data are available from 1995-2010 and are available on a state and national level.

According to an online survey conducted in February 2025 in the United States, ********* of LinkedIn users held a bachelor degree or equivalent. Additionally, ** percent of LinkedIn users in the U.S. held a masters degree or equivalent.

The COVID-19 data sets and associated Jupyter Hub notebooks are support for a manuscript describing how data science was shown to be effective in developing a transdisciplinary team and the production of novel outputs in part due to the common learning process of all team members being part of an online professional data science and analytics master’s degree program. This online curriculum helped the team members to find a common process that allowed them learn in common (Kläy, Zimmermann, & Schneider, 2015), transdisciplinary learning a key component of transdisciplinary teamwork (Yeung, 2015). Our team's Jupyter Hub files with complete coding and data set explanations are uploaded to document this teamwork and the outputs of the team.

About Dataset

This dataset was created during the Programming Language Ecosystem project from TU Wien using the code inside the repository https://github.com/ValentinFutterer/UsageOfProgramminglanguages2011-2023?tab=readme-ov-file.

The centerpiece of this repository is the usage_of_programming_languages_2011-2023.csv. This csv file shows the popularity of programming languages over the last 12 years in yearly increments. The repository also contains graphs created with the dataset. To get an accurate estimate on the popularity of programming languages, this dataset was created using 3 vastly different sources.

About Data collection methodology

The dataset was created using the github repository above. As input data, three public datasets where used.

github_metadata

Taken from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pelmers/github-repository-metadata-with-5-stars/ by Peter Elmers. It is licensed under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. It shows metadata information (no code) of all github repositories with more than 5 stars.

PYPL_survey_2004-2023

Taken from https://github.com/pypl/pypl.github.io/tree/master, put online by the user pcarbonn. It is licensed under CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. It shows from 2004 to 2023 for each month the share of programming related google searches per language.

stack_overflow_developer_survey

Taken from https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey. It is licensed under Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0 https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/. It shows from 2011 to 2023 the results of the yearly stackoverflow developer survey.

All these datasets were downloaded on the 12.12.2023. The datasets are all in the github repository above

Description of the data

The dataset contains a column for the year and then many columns for the different languages, denoting their usage in percent. Additionally, vertical barcharts and piecharts for each year plus a line graph for each language over the whole timespan as png's are provided.

The languages that are going to be considered for the project can be seen here:

- Python

- C

- C++

- Java

- C#

- JavaScript

- PHP

- SQL

- Assembly

- Scratch

- Fortran

- Go

- Kotlin

- Delphi

- Swift

- Rust

- Ruby

- R

- COBOL

- F#

- Perl

- TypeScript

- Haskell

- Scala

License

This project is licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0 https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/ license.

TLDR: You are free to share, adapt, and create derivative works from this dataser as long as you attribute me, keep the database open (if you redistribute it), and continue to share-alike any adapted database under the ODbl.

Acknowledgments

Thanks go out to

- stackoverflow https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey for providing the data from the yearly stackoverflow developer survey.

- the PYPL survey, https://github.com/pypl/pypl.github.io/tree/master for providing google search data.

- Peter Elmers, for crawling metadata on github repositories and providing the data https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pelmers/github-repository-metadata-with-5-stars/.

This dataset contains counts of live births for California as a whole based on information entered on birth certificates. Final counts are derived from static data and include out of state births to California residents, whereas provisional counts are derived from incomplete and dynamic data. Provisional counts are based on the records available when the data was retrieved and may not represent all births that occurred during the time period.

The final data tables include both births that occurred in California regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence) and births to California residents (by residence), whereas the provisional data table only includes births that occurred in California regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence). The data are reported as totals, as well as stratified by parent giving birth's age, parent giving birth's race-ethnicity, and birth place type. See temporal coverage for more information on which strata are available for which years.

The global massive open online course (MOOC) market size is calculated to advance at a CAGR of 32% through 2034, which is set to increase its market value from US$ 13.2 billion in 2024 to US$ 212.7 billion by the end of 2034.

Report Attribute	Detail
MOOC Market Size (2024E)	US$ 13.2 Billion
Projected Market Value (2034F)	US$ 212.7 Billion
Global Market Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	32% CAGR
China Market Value (2034F)	US$ 23.3 Billion
Japan Market Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	32.6% CAGR
North America Market Share (2024E)	23.9%
East Asia Market Value (2034F)	US$ 49.1 Billion
Key Companies Profiled	Alison; Coursera Inc; edX Inc; Federica.EU; FutureLearn; Instructure; Intellipaat; iverity; Jigsaw Academy; Kadenze.

Country Wise Insights

Attribute	United States
Market Value (2024E)	US$ 1.4 Billion
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	32.5% CAGR
Projected Value (2034F)	US$ 23.6 Billion

Attribute	China
Market Value (2024E)	US$ 1.5 Billion
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	32% CAGR
Projected Value (2034F)	US$ 23.3 Billion

Category-wise Insights

Attribute	xMOOC
Segment Value (2024E)	US$ 9.3 Billion
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	30.8% CAGR
Projected Value (2034F)	US$ 136.1 Billion

Attribute	Degree & Master Programs
Segment Value (2024E)	US$ 6.4 Billion
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034)	30.2% CAGR
Projected Value (2034F)	US$ 89.3 Billion

This dataset provides Census 2021 estimates for National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SeC) by sex in Northern Ireland. The estimates are as at census day, 21 March 2021.

The census collected information on the usually resident population of Northern Ireland on census day (21 March 2021). Initial contact letters or questionnaire packs were delivered to every household and communal establishment, and residents were asked to complete online or return the questionnaire with information as correct on census day. Special arrangements were made to enumerate special groups such as students, members of the Travellers Community, HM Forces personnel etc. The Census Coverage Survey (an independent doorstep survey) followed between 12 May and 29 June 2021 and was used to adjust the census counts for under-enumeration.

The quality assurance report can be found here

Descriptive statistics-aggregate data.

Table View of Master_OP_EXP - Budgets and Actuals from FY 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and FYTD 2020. This View is the data source for Expense Dashboards. Update Schedule: Once per Month.

In an impressive increase from years past, 39 percent of women in the United States had completed four years or more of college in 2022. This figure is up from 3.8 percent of women in 1940. A significant increase can also be seen in males, with 36.2 percent of the U.S. male population having completed four years or more of college in 2022, up from 5.5 percent in 1940.

4- and 2-year colleges

In the United States, college students are able to choose between attending a 2-year postsecondary program and a 4-year postsecondary program. Generally, attending a 2-year program results in an Associate’s Degree, and 4-year programs result in a Bachelor’s Degree.

Many 2-year programs are designed so that attendees can transfer to a college or university offering a 4-year program upon completing their Associate’s. Completion of a 4-year program is the generally accepted standard for entry-level positions when looking for a job.

Earnings after college

Factors such as gender, degree achieved, and the level of postsecondary education can have an impact on employment and earnings later in life. Some Bachelor’s degrees continue to attract more male students than female, particularly in STEM fields, while liberal arts degrees such as education, languages and literatures, and communication tend to see higher female attendance.

All of these factors have an impact on earnings after college, and despite nearly the same rate of attendance within the American population between males and females, men with a Bachelor’s Degree continue to have higher weekly earnings on average than their female counterparts.

1. Provides public access to real-time instantatenous water level collected at over 1800 active locations in Canada. These data are collected under a national program jointly administered under federal-provincial and federal-territorial cost-sharing agreements; 2. Provides public access to archived daily water level for stations of interest using search criteria. These data include: daily and monthly mean, max and min of water levels. For some sites, annual peaks and extremes are also recorded. Archived water level data are disseminated online; 3. Provides public access to a MS Access database file containing archived daily water level that users can download to their desktop. These data include: daily and monthly mean, max and min of water level. For some sites, annual peaks and extremes are also recorded. MS Access file is updated quarterly; 4. Provides public access to water level statistics for stations of interest using search criteria.

This dataset contains counts of deaths for California counties based on information entered on death certificates. Final counts are derived from static data and include out-of-state deaths to California residents, whereas provisional counts are derived from incomplete and dynamic data. Provisional counts are based on the records available when the data was retrieved and may not represent all deaths that occurred during the time period. Deaths involving injuries from external or environmental forces, such as accidents, homicide and suicide, often require additional investigation that tends to delay certification of the cause and manner of death. This can result in significant under-reporting of these deaths in provisional data.

The final data tables include both deaths that occurred in each California county regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence) and deaths to residents of each California county (by residence), whereas the provisional data table only includes deaths that occurred in each county regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence). The data are reported as totals, as well as stratified by age, gender, race-ethnicity, and death place type. Deaths due to all causes (ALL) and selected underlying cause of death categories are provided. See temporal coverage for more information on which combinations are available for which years.

The cause of death categories are based solely on the underlying cause of death as coded by the International Classification of Diseases. The underlying cause of death is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury." It is a single value assigned to each death based on the details as entered on the death certificate. When more than one cause is listed, the order in which they are listed can affect which cause is coded as the underlying cause. This means that similar events could be coded with different underlying causes of death depending on variations in how they were entered. Consequently, while underlying cause of death provides a convenient comparison between cause of death categories, it may not capture the full impact of each cause of death as it does not always take into account all conditions contributing to the death.

More information about the context and the methodology can be found in the README.md file and online at this link: https://github.com/sdgis-edu-tud/fair-data-publication-groupf.

Along with the Elbe river, Dresden comprises a dense network of streams, which are spread out across its fabric. Presently, the streams are secluded from being a valuable part of the city. The problems are characterised by ecological issues, inappropriate land use by residents, and artificial channeling. They, along with the Elbe river hold potential to become elements of integrating the ecological and social functions of the city by reclaiming the historical identity of waterfronts and restoring natural habitats. Therefore, there arises a need to understand how to integrate these streams into the network of protected green areas and public spaces, while maximising their contribution to biodiversity while adapting to the risk of flooding within and around the city.

These concerns and identified potentials beg the question that, how can urban streams be restored and integrated in Dresden's fabric, such that there is a synergy between human activities and the natural environment?

This is investigated by adopting an integrated approach for biodiversity, climate adaptation and quality of life.

Based on the three criteria that we decided to tackle, we came up with numerical indicators that we could use to evaluate them. These numerical indicators are called attributes and have to be normalised—in our case between 0 and 1—so that they can be compared, weighted and thereafter clustered properly depending on their relevance and similarities.

The spatial units used in this study are hexagons with a dimension of 250 meters. The study area of Dresden is divided using a complete surface of a hexagonal pattern. Then it is overlaid with the water stream network and river body from OpenStreetMap to keep only the hexagons that intersect with at least one stream. Finally, the isolated hexagons were removed.

Two data-driven methods were used to conduct the analysis:

• S-MCDA (Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) — S-MCDA was used to weigh the different attributes against each other. The method supports decision-making by evaluating and ranking alternatives (the attributes) within the three objectives of biodiversity, climate adaptation and quality of life.
• Typology Construction — Typology construction is used to group attributes into homogenous types based on similarities. This was used to identify patterns in data and make clusters of attributes that show similarity, which can thereafter be used to understand the type of interventions which would be impactful.

This dataset contains both the values computed for the attributes in each spatial unit and the final results of the two methods.

The Colleges and Universities feature class/shapefile is composed of all Post Secondary Education facilities as defined by the Integrated Post Secondary Education System (IPEDS, http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov/), US Department of Education for the 2018-2019 school year. Included are Doctoral/Research Universities, Masters Colleges and Universities, Baccalaureate Colleges, Associates Colleges, Theological seminaries, Medical Schools and other health care professions, Schools of engineering and technology, business and management, art, music, design, Law schools, Teachers colleges, Tribal colleges, and other specialized institutions. Overall, this data layer covers all 50 states, as well as Puerto Rico and other assorted U.S. territories. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Homeland Security Infrastructure Program (HSIP) Team. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the "Place Keyword" section of the metadata. This feature class does not have a relationship class but is related to Supplemental Colleges. Colleges and Universities that are not included in the NCES IPEDS data are added to the Supplemental Colleges feature class when found. This release includes the addition of 175 new records, the removal of 468 no longer reported by NCES, and modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 6682 records.

Data were collected through an online survey and processed to create 95% CI using the BCA bootstrap confidence interval algorithm in MS EXCEL. Construction of confidence interval in MS EXCEL using the BCA bootstrap confidence interval algorithm is earlier not presented in any studies. The macro capabilities of MS EXCEL was utilized for the purpose stated.

Description

Conversion of various NASA datasets into RDF, starting with the spacecraft data from the NSSDC master catalog.

This dataset consists of a conversion of the NASA NSSDC Master Catalog and extracts of the Apollo By Numbers statistics.

Currently the data consists of all of the Spacecraft from the NSSDC database which is a comprehensive list of orbital, suborbital, and interplanetary spacecraft launches dataing from the 1950s to the present day. Entries are not limited to NASA missions, but include spacecraft launched by various agencies from around the globe.

Note this dataset is no longer updated, it was taken off-line during the shutdown of Kasabi. A dump of the dataset has been uploaded to the Internet Archive