8 datasets found
  1. u

    Mobile Units Box Plots (CO, NO2, O3, PM10, SO2) 15 Minute Average Imagery

    • data.ucar.edu
    image
    Updated Oct 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Charles E Kolb (2025). Mobile Units Box Plots (CO, NO2, O3, PM10, SO2) 15 Minute Average Imagery [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26023/F8M5-N5FC-9210
    Explore at:
    imageAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2025
    Authors
    Charles E Kolb
    Time period covered
    Mar 1, 2006 - Mar 21, 2006
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset contains 15 minute average mobile unit box plot imagery of CO, NO2, O3, PM10, and SO2 collected during the MILAGRO field project.

  2. Containing various supplementary figures and tables, listed as follows.

    • plos.figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Leung-Yau Lo; Man-Leung Wong; Kin-Hong Lee; Kwong-Sak Leung (2023). Containing various supplementary figures and tables, listed as follows. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138596.s001
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Leung-Yau Lo; Man-Leung Wong; Kin-Hong Lee; Kwong-Sak Leung
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Figure A, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Delays and Effects for One Segment Small Hidden Case. Figure B, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Links and Delays for One Segment Small Hidden Case. Figure C, Profiles of F-scores of Links, Delays and Effects for Different Settings for One Segment Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure D, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Links and Effects for One Segment Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure E, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Delays and Effects for One Segment Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure F, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Links and Delays for One Segment Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure G, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Links and Effects for One Segment Large Case. Figure H, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Delays and Effects for One Segment Large Case. Figure I, Histogram of Absolute Differences of F-scores of Links and Delays for One Segment Large Case. Figure J, Boxplot of Effects F-score with Different σ2 for One Segment Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure K, Boxplot of Effects F-score with Different σ2 for One Segment Large Case. Figure L, Boxplot of Effects F-score with Different σ2 for Multiple Segments Small Hidden Case. Figure M, Boxplot of Effects F-score with Different σ2 for Multiple Segments Small Non-Hidden Case. Figure N, Boxplot of Effects F-score with Different σ2 for Multiple Segments Large Case. Table A, Full Results of Median Performance for One Segment Small GRN with One Hidden Node.e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nps is number of time points m, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 20 replicates. Table B, Full Results of Median Performance for One Segment Small GRN without Hidden Node. e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nps is number of time points m, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 20 replicates. Table C, P-values of one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test on whether the medians Effects F-scores of hidden is better than hiddenCL for the One Segment Large Case. Table D, Full Results of Median Performance for Multiple Segments Small GRN with One Hidden Node. e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nsegs is number of segments K, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 20 replicates. Table E, Full Results of Median Performance for Multiple Segments Small GRN without Hidden Node. e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nsegs is number of segments K, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 20 replicates. Table F, Full Results of Median Performance for Multiple Segments Large GRN with More than One Hidden Node with n = 50 and n = 100. ng is the number of observed genes n, nh is the number of hidden nodes nh, e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nsegs is number of segments K, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 40 replicates. Table G, P-values of one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test on whether the medians Effects F-scores of hidden is better than hiddenCL for the Multiple Segments Large Case. Table H, Full Results of Median Performance for One Segments Large GRN with Different δ2 with n = 50 and n = 100. ng is the number of observed genes n, nh is the number of hidden nodes nh, e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nps is number of time points m, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. d2 is δ2. Each median is taken over 40 replicates. Table I, Full Results of Median Performance for Multiple Segments Large GRN with More than One Hidden Node with n = 50 and n = 100. ng is the number of observed genes n, nh is the number of hidden nodes nh, e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nsegs is number of segments K, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. d2 is δ2. Each median is taken over 40 replicates. Table J, P-values of one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test on whether the medians Effects F-scores of hidden is better than hiddenCL for the Heterogeneous Variance One Segment Large Case. Table K, P-values of one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test on whether the medians Effects F-scores of hidden is better than hiddenCL for the Heterogeneous Variance Multiple Segments Large Case. Table L, Full Results of Median Performance for One Segment Large GRN with More than One Hidden Node with n = 50 and n = 100. ng is the number of observed genes n, nh is the number of hidden nodes nh, e2 is σ2, alpha is α, nps is number of time points m, st is the score threshold. For the data column, hidden means using our proposed algorithm on the incomplete data, complete means using CLINDE on the complete data (i.e. all nodes are not hidden), hiddenCL means using CLINDE on the incomplete data. l2., d2. and e2. are Links, Delays and Effects respectively. r is Recall, p is Precision and f is F-score. Each median is taken over 40 replicates. (ZIP)

  3. Pre-course, post-course and one-year post-course mean test scores with...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brown David Khongo; Kelly Schmiedeknecht; Moses Banda Aron; Prisca Nelisa Nyangulu; Wellington Mazengera; Enoch Ndarama; Andrea G. Tenner; Kimberly Baltzell; Emilia Connolly (2023). Pre-course, post-course and one-year post-course mean test scores with median difference in Lisungwi Community Hospital and Neno District Hospital. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280454.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Brown David Khongo; Kelly Schmiedeknecht; Moses Banda Aron; Prisca Nelisa Nyangulu; Wellington Mazengera; Enoch Ndarama; Andrea G. Tenner; Kimberly Baltzell; Emilia Connolly
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Pre-course, post-course and one-year post-course mean test scores with median difference in Lisungwi Community Hospital and Neno District Hospital.

  4. Correlates of data availability.

    • plos.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew F. Magee; Michael R. May; Brian R. Moore (2023). Correlates of data availability. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110268.g003
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Andrew F. Magee; Michael R. May; Brian R. Moore
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    We used Bayesian logistic regression to estimate the effect of several variables on the on the probability that phylogenetic datasets were either available from a public archive (left column) or could be successfully procured by direct solicitation (right column). Specifically, for all datasets we explored the effect of the data-sharing policy of the publishing journal (scored as none, weak, strong, or JDAP membership) and the impact of funding-agency policy (NSF). For solicited datasets, we also assessed the impact of solicitor status (undergraduate, graduate, or professor). We estimated effects of these variables on our ability to successfully procure either the tree or alignment files (top panels), or both the tree and alignment files (bottom panels) for a given study. The estimated effect size for a given variable reflects its contribution to the probability of successfully acquiring the data. For each variable, the marginal distribution of its estimated effect size is summarized as a boxplot, indicating the median effect (solid line), interquartile range (box), and interquartile range (whisker) of the corresponding posterior probability distribution. Journal-policy effects are relative to the effect of a weak policy, and solicitor-status effects are relative to that of graduate student. The predictor variables and interpretation of the corresponding parameters are described in Table 1.

  5. Average negentropy of simulated EEGmix channels and detected sources per...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van (2023). Average negentropy of simulated EEGmix channels and detected sources per algorithm obtained over 10 model simulations (MD = 75%)–see S1 Fig for a boxplot presentation. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174462.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Average negentropy of simulated EEGmix channels and detected sources per algorithm obtained over 10 model simulations (MD = 75%)–see S1 Fig for a boxplot presentation.

  6. Box plot showing the distribution of SIR values of the two groups with the...

    • plos.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Huiqun Zhou; Zhengnong Chen; Haibo Shi; Yaqin Wu; Shankai Yin (2023). Box plot showing the distribution of SIR values of the two groups with the time of implant usage. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053852.g002
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Huiqun Zhou; Zhengnong Chen; Haibo Shi; Yaqin Wu; Shankai Yin
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Box plot explanation: upper horizontal line of box, 75th percentile; lower horizontal line of box, 25th percentile; horizontal bar within box, median; upper horizontal bar outside box, 90th percentile; lower horizontal bar outside box, 10th percentile. Circles represent outliers.

  7. Box plot showing the distribution of CAP values of the two groups with the...

    • plos.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Huiqun Zhou; Zhengnong Chen; Haibo Shi; Yaqin Wu; Shankai Yin (2023). Box plot showing the distribution of CAP values of the two groups with the time of implant usage. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053852.g001
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Huiqun Zhou; Zhengnong Chen; Haibo Shi; Yaqin Wu; Shankai Yin
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Box plot explanation: upper horizontal line of box, 75th percentile; lower horizontal line of box, 25th percentile; horizontal bar within box, median; upper horizontal bar outside box, 90th percentile; lower horizontal bar outside box, 10th percentile. Circles represent outliers.

  8. Box plots of hatchling snout-vent lengths.

    • plos.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jitka Jančúchová-Lásková; Eva Landová; Daniel Frynta (2023). Box plots of hatchling snout-vent lengths. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143630.g004
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Jitka Jančúchová-Lásková; Eva Landová; Daniel Frynta
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    E. macularius (n = 32), E. angramainyu (n = 4), their hybrids of the first (F1; n = 25) and second (F2; n = 3) filial generations and the reciprocal backcrosses of F1 males or females to the E. macularius (B1M; the individuals with father F1 hybrid are denoted as MxMA, while those with the mother F1 hybrid as MAxM; n = 11 and 16, respectively). Median, quartiles and ranges are provided.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Charles E Kolb (2025). Mobile Units Box Plots (CO, NO2, O3, PM10, SO2) 15 Minute Average Imagery [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26023/F8M5-N5FC-9210

Mobile Units Box Plots (CO, NO2, O3, PM10, SO2) 15 Minute Average Imagery

Explore at:
imageAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Oct 7, 2025
Authors
Charles E Kolb
Time period covered
Mar 1, 2006 - Mar 21, 2006
Area covered
Description

This dataset contains 15 minute average mobile unit box plot imagery of CO, NO2, O3, PM10, and SO2 collected during the MILAGRO field project.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu