The Digital Geohazard-GIS Map of the Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (meve_geohazard.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (meve_geohazard.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (meve_geohazard.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (meve_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (meve_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (meve_geohazard_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the meve_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (meve_geohazard_metadata.txt or meve_geohazard_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:50,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 25.4 meters or 83.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Buildings. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Wall map of Mesa County's 67 voting precincts and boundaries of Colorado State House districts 54 and 55. A 60 x 36" copy can be purchased for $10 by contacting Mesa County Elections.

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Milemarkers. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Parcels. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

This dataset was created and is maintained by Mesa County, this copy is for use at the City of Grand Junction, but is not considered the official dataset. Please contact Mesa County for information about this data or to verify any of the data within. The dataset shows property boundaries and information for Mesa County, in Colorado.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Wetherill Mesa Quadrangle, Colorado is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (weme_geology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (weme_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (weme_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (meve_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (meve_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (weme_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the meve_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: National Park Service. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (weme_geology_metadata.txt or weme_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Mesa Quadrangle, Colorado is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (bime_geology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (bime_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (bime_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (blca-cure_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (blca-cure_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (bime_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the blca-cure_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (bime_geology_metadata.txt or bime_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The purpose of Colorado Geological Survey’s (CGS) Geologic Map of the Rattlesnake Mesa Quadrangle,Rio Blanco County, Colorado is to describe the geology of this 7.5-minute quadrangle located in the vicinity of the town of Meeker in northwestern Colorado. CGS staff geologist Jonathan L. White and field assistants James Hodge and Michael J. Zawaski completed the field work on this project at the end of the summer of 2010. Jon White, the principal mapper and author, created this report using field maps, photographs, structural measurements, and field notes generated by all the investigators. Significant knowledge was also gained by a compilation of the available published geologic literature listed in the references. This map was improved from reviews by Larry Moyer (consulting petroleum geologist), David Noe (Colorado Geological Survey), as well as pertinent edits of the adjacent Meeker quadrangle by Rex Cole (Colorado Mesa University). This mapping project was funded jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the CGS. USGS funding comes from the STATEMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award number G10AC00410, authorized by the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1997, reauthorized in 2009. CGS matching funding comes from the Colorado Department of Natural Resources Severance Tax Operational Funds, from severance taxes paid on the production of natural gas, oil, coal, and metals in Colorado. Digital PDF and ESRI ArcGIS download. OF-13-06D

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Bus Stops. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Hospitals. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Data provided by Joel Sholtes – Colorado Mesa University.Polygon river margins traced from Mesa County air photos between 1937 and 2020. Margins are a snapshot in time and are representative only of the date that the air photo was taken.

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Fire Stations. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

This feature class contains zoning and current land use data for parcels within the City of Grand Junction, Colorado. Zoning descriptions and standards are outlined in Chapter 21.03 of the Grand Junction Zoning and Development Code. The City GIS maintains a model that updates zoning every week to reflect any changes that occur in parcel boundaries at the County level. Any zoning overlay standards supersede the base zoning standards where they exist. Current land use is determined from the most up-to-date air photos obtained by either the City of Grand Junction or Mesa County.

Geospatial data about Mesa County, Colorado Bus Routes. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Servicio de análisis AVR para Inundación en el municipio de La MesaEl análisis de la amenaza por inundación se mide en función de la frecuencia de ocurrencia. En áreas urbanas y rurales, será posible evaluar la amenaza por inundación desde la amenaza hidrodinámica (análisis hidráulico), mediante la modelación de las crecientes que transitan por las fuentes hídricas.

Para realizar el estudio hidrológico de la zonas a estudiar, se hace indispensable la identificación de las fuentes hídricas presentes en el área de estudio, tomando como base la información cartográfica del municipio, haciendo uso de un Ráster de resolución de 30X30 mtrs, y se realiza la identificación de las fuentes presentes.

|categoria:Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible|cobertura:Departamental

Producto cartográfico básico a escala 1:1.000 que contiene: a) Elementos altimétricos, los cuales se obtienen a partir de procesos fotogramétricos o técnicas de interferometría. Intervalo básico de curvas de nivel cada 1 metro. Curvas de nivel índice cada 5 metros. b) Elementos planimétricos, obtenidos desde procesos fotogramétricos o fotointerpretación, los cuales son estructurados en una base de datos en formato Geodatabase, conforme al modelo de datos vigente de producción cartográfica. Se captura los elementos para la escala de carácter permanente, hasta el límite determinado para el proyecto. c) Cabecera Municipal de La Mesa, tiene un cubrimiento aproximado de408,845 hectáreas. d) El proceso se realizó con Fotografías Aéreas de: 20210908, Compilación Toponímica insumo de: 2014, 2019y 2021, Restitución Fotogramétrica en: 2021

Plan submitted by: AriBradshaw on 10/17/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: N/A USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: Dear public, commission, and mapping team:

This map follows many of the comments received at the latest IRC meeting in addition to a few parameters we feel must be followed to the best of the IRC's ability. The numbers we have used in this map are arbitrary and can be aligned closer with the current IRC numbers. Each district is equal in population.

The Phoenix-Mesa metro area holds 2/3 of the population. It holds that it should have 2/3 of the congressional districts without marginalizing the voices of rural counties.

Tucson can largely fit within one congressional district. Its suburbs can be split and its exurbs can be included into an "East Pima" district alongside a rural district.

We want to honor as best as possible the Latino coalition's map for a Phoenix district.

We have created two rural districts. CD1 combines the Colorado River counties with the Flagstaff-Prescott corridor. We exclude North Coconino and Mohave counties into CD2 as their towns of Fredonia and Colorado City are beyond the Grand Canyon and share more in common with the Mormon settlements of Apache and Navajo counties. The Kaibab reservation gets to have a voice alongside many other natives. CD1 combines the river natives with the Canyon natives and the Southern natives. The IRC made it clear that they wanted the Yuma natives and Tohono natives to be in the same district and so we have accomplished such with minimal compromise.

The East Valley is split into two districts. The far east includes San Tan Valley, Apache Junction, and much of the far east and south of the urban area. The other district includes all of Tempe south of the river alongside Ahwatukee and large portions of Mesa.

There exists a Northeast Valley district that consists of the rapidly changing downtown Phoenix, Uptown, Arcadia, Scottsdale, Fountain Hills, and the Salt River and Fort Mohave Natives. New River, Anthem, Cave Creek, and Carefree are included as well due to their community of interest with Northeast Phoenix and Scottsdale.

The Latino district is largely the same as that submitted by the coalition. We have traded a portion of downtown Phoenix that has much more in common with Arcadia and Uptown than it does with South Phoenix for more of Southwest Phoenix.

District 4 is a suburban and exurban district that covers most of Pinal county in addition to Buckeye, Goodyear, and Avondale. The borders lie across from retirement communities such as Sun City. The only major area of compromise on this entire map is found in this area and it is fixable with some effort - the town of Coolidge, AZ.

This map contains four competitive districts. By trading some blocks between District 5 and District 4 near Glendale, we can create five competitive districts.

This map contains a total of three minority-majority districts (CD3, 4, and 7) with one district at 50.95% non-hispanic white (CD2). By trading land between CD2 and CD3, we can achieve a total of four minority-majority districts.

Abraham and I highly urge the committee and mapping team to consider this map and its choice to leave Maricopan interests out of Rural districts and to consolidate Tucson into one district with its exurbs in another and its suburbs split.

Thank you so much for your time and dedication to the State of Arizona and all of its people. God Bless.