21 datasets found
  1. Meta monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2012-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Meta monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2012-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1331143/meta-share-price-development-monthly/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    May 2012 - Jan 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The price of Meta (former Facebook) shares traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange fluctuated significantly but increased overall during the period from May 2012 to January 2025. After peaking at ****** U.S. dollars per share in August 2021, the price of Meta shares started to fluctuate and exceeded its previous peak in 2025. The share price stood at ****** U.S. dollars as of the end of January 2025. Substantial fluctuations in the last few years Meta's stock prices have fluctuated particularly after the rebranding announcement in late 2021. Following the announcement and through 2022, Meta's revenue remained rather stagnant, and its net income decreased considerably. Moreover, the tech giant announced one of the industry's largest layoffs in late 2022. As a result, the share price hit a low of ***** U.S. dollars in October 2022, the lowest value observed since 2016. However, Meta's share price has been steadily recovering since then. Shift in strategy for the world’s first social network Meta has shifted its focus to the metaverse, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), with the rebranding in late 2021. As a result, Reality Labs was established as a dedicated business and research unit to focus on developing metaverse and AR/VR technologies. However, as of early 2023, Meta still relies mainly on advertising and its Family of Apps to generate most of its revenue, despite having made significant investments in virtual reality. Reality Labs generated *** billion U.S. dollars in revenue in 2024 and has been consistently incurring operating losses since 2019.

  2. Meta Stock Price Technical Indicators (10 Years)

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Feb 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aravind Pillai (2024). Meta Stock Price Technical Indicators (10 Years) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/7652066
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Aravind Pillai
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Meta stock price for past 10 years. Following technical indicators added.

    1. Date: This column represents the date for which the data is recorded.
    2. Open: The opening price of a stock on a particular trading day.
    3. High: The highest price at which a stock traded during the trading day.
    4. Low: The lowest price at which a stock traded during the trading day.
    5. Close: The closing price of a stock on a particular trading day. This is the final price at which the stock is valued for the day.
    6. Volume: The number of shares or contracts traded in a security or an entire market during a given period, usually one trading day.
    7. RSI_7: 7-day Relative Strength Index. It's a momentum indicator measuring the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions in the price of a stock.
    8. RSI_14: 14-day Relative Strength Index. Similar to RSI_7 but calculated over 14 days.
    9. CCI_7: 7-day Commodity Channel Index. It’s a technical indicator that measures the difference between the current price and the historical average price. When calculated over 7 days, it gives short-term trends.
    10. CCI_14: 14-day Commodity Channel Index. Like CCI_7, but over 14 days for more medium-term trends.
    11. SMA_50: 50-day Simple Moving Average. It averages the closing prices of a stock over the past 50 days.
    12. EMA_50: 50-day Exponential Moving Average. Similar to SMA_50, but gives more weight to recent prices, making it more responsive to new information.
    13. SMA_100: 100-day Simple Moving Average. It averages the closing prices over the past 100 days.
    14. EMA_100: 100-day Exponential Moving Average. Like SMA_100, but more responsive to recent price changes.
    15. MACD: Moving Average Convergence Divergence. This indicator shows the relationship between two moving averages of a stock’s price.
    16. Bollinger: Bollinger Bands. A type of price envelope developed by John Bollinger.
    17. TrueRange: Typically used in calculating the Average True Range (ATR), it is a measure of volatility that considers the range between the high, low, and previous close of a stock.
    18. ATR_7: 7-day Average True Range. It measures market volatility by decomposing the entire range of a stock for that period.
    19. ATR_14: 14-day Average True Range. Similar to ATR_7, but calculated over 14 days.

    Target

    Next_Day_Close: Represents the closing price of the stock for the next day. It is useful for predictive models trying to forecast future prices.

  3. Can we predict stock market using machine learning? (META Stock Forecast)...

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Sep 1, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2022). Can we predict stock market using machine learning? (META Stock Forecast) (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2022/09/can-we-predict-stock-market-using_30.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Can we predict stock market using machine learning? (META Stock Forecast)

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  4. Meta Stock: The Future of Social Media (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2023). Meta Stock: The Future of Social Media (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2023/06/meta-stock-future-of-social-media.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta Stock: The Future of Social Media

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  5. Stock Market: Historical Data of Top 10 Companies

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Jul 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Khushi Pitroda (2023). Stock Market: Historical Data of Top 10 Companies [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/khushipitroda/stock-market-historical-data-of-top-10-companies/data
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Khushi Pitroda
    Description

    The dataset contains a total of 25,161 rows, each row representing the stock market data for a specific company on a given date. The information collected through web scraping from www.nasdaq.com includes the stock prices and trading volumes for the companies listed, such as Apple, Starbucks, Microsoft, Cisco Systems, Qualcomm, Meta, Amazon.com, Tesla, Advanced Micro Devices, and Netflix.

    Data Analysis Tasks:

    1) Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): Analyze the distribution of stock prices and volumes for each company over time. Visualize trends, seasonality, and patterns in the stock market data using line charts, bar plots, and heatmaps.

    2)Correlation Analysis: Investigate the correlations between the closing prices of different companies to identify potential relationships. Calculate correlation coefficients and visualize correlation matrices.

    3)Top Performers Identification: Identify the top-performing companies based on their stock price growth and trading volumes over a specific time period.

    4)Market Sentiment Analysis: Perform sentiment analysis using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques on news headlines related to each company. Determine whether positive or negative news impacts the stock prices and volumes.

    5)Volatility Analysis: Calculate the volatility of each company's stock prices using metrics like Standard Deviation or Bollinger Bands. Analyze how volatile stocks are in comparison to others.

    Machine Learning Tasks:

    1)Stock Price Prediction: Use time-series forecasting models like ARIMA, SARIMA, or Prophet to predict future stock prices for a particular company. Evaluate the models' performance using metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE) or Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).

    2)Classification of Stock Movements: Create a binary classification model to predict whether a stock will rise or fall on the next trading day. Utilize features like historical price changes, volumes, and technical indicators for the predictions. Implement classifiers such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, or Support Vector Machines (SVM).

    3)Clustering Analysis: Cluster companies based on their historical stock performance using unsupervised learning algorithms like K-means clustering. Explore if companies with similar stock price patterns belong to specific industry sectors.

    4)Anomaly Detection: Detect anomalies in stock prices or trading volumes that deviate significantly from the historical trends. Use techniques like Isolation Forest or One-Class SVM for anomaly detection.

    5)Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Optimization: Formulate the stock market data as a reinforcement learning problem to optimize a portfolio's performance. Apply algorithms like Q-Learning or Deep Q-Networks (DQN) to learn the optimal trading strategy.

    The dataset provided on Kaggle, titled "Stock Market Stars: Historical Data of Top 10 Companies," is intended for learning purposes only. The data has been gathered from public sources, specifically from web scraping www.nasdaq.com, and is presented in good faith to facilitate educational and research endeavors related to stock market analysis and data science.

    It is essential to acknowledge that while we have taken reasonable measures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, we do not guarantee its completeness or correctness. The information provided in this dataset may contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Users are advised to use this dataset at their own risk and are responsible for verifying the data's integrity for their specific applications.

    This dataset is not intended for any commercial or legal use, and any reliance on the data for financial or investment decisions is not recommended. We disclaim any responsibility or liability for any damages, losses, or consequences arising from the use of this dataset.

    By accessing and utilizing this dataset on Kaggle, you agree to abide by these terms and conditions and understand that it is solely intended for educational and research purposes.

    Please note that the dataset's contents, including the stock market data and company names, are subject to copyright and other proprietary rights of the respective sources. Users are advised to adhere to all applicable laws and regulations related to data usage, intellectual property, and any other relevant legal obligations.

    In summary, this dataset is provided "as is" for learning purposes, without any warranties or guarantees, and users should exercise due diligence and judgment when using the data for any purpose.

  6. Meta (NASDAQ:META) (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated May 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2023). Meta (NASDAQ:META) (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2023/05/meta-nasdaqmeta.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 18, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta (NASDAQ:META)

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  7. M

    Meta Platforms Net Profit Margin 2010-2025 | META

    • macrotrends.net
    csv
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MACROTRENDS (2025). Meta Platforms Net Profit Margin 2010-2025 | META [Dataset]. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/META/meta-platforms/profit-margins
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MACROTRENDS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2010 - 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Meta Platforms net profit margin for the quarter ending March 31, 2025 was 39.11%. Meta Platforms average net profit margin for 2024 was 34.97%, a 56.47% increase from 2023. Meta Platforms average net profit margin for 2023 was 22.35%, a 13.77% increase from 2022. Meta Platforms average net profit margin for 2022 was 25.92%, a 27.09% decline from 2021. Net profit margin can be defined as net Income as a portion of total sales revenue.

  8. Meta Platforms (META) on the Metaverse Road to Redemption (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Sep 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2024). Meta Platforms (META) on the Metaverse Road to Redemption (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2024/09/meta-platforms-meta-on-metaverse-road.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta Platforms (META) on the Metaverse Road to Redemption

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  9. Data from: Open Source Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing

    • catalog.data.gov
    • catalog-dev.data.gov
    Updated Dec 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2024). Open Source Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/open-source-cross-sectional-asset-pricing
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Reserve Board of Governors
    Federal Reserve Systemhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/
    Description

    These data and code successfully reproduce nearly all cross-sectional stock return predictors. The 319 characteristics draw from previous meta-studies, but authors differ by comparing their t-stats to the original papers' results. For the 161 characteristics that were clearly significant in the original papers, 98% of their long-short portfolios find t-stats above 1.96. For the 44 characteristics that had mixed evidence, authors' reproductions find t-stats of 2 on average. A regression of reproduced t-stats on original longshort t-stats finds a slope of 0.90 and an R2 of 83%. Mean returns aremonotonic in predictive signals at the characteristic level. The remaining 114 characteristics were insignificant in the original papers or are modifications of the originals created by Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2020). These remaining characteristics are almost always significant if the original characteristic was also significant.

  10. f

    The Use of Mixed Effects Models for Obtaining Low-Cost Ecosystem Carbon...

    • plos.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob J. Bukoski; Jeremy S. Broadhead; Daniel C. Donato; Daniel Murdiyarso; Timothy G. Gregoire (2023). The Use of Mixed Effects Models for Obtaining Low-Cost Ecosystem Carbon Stock Estimates in Mangroves of the Asia-Pacific [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169096
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Jacob J. Bukoski; Jeremy S. Broadhead; Daniel C. Donato; Daniel Murdiyarso; Timothy G. Gregoire
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Mangroves provide extensive ecosystem services that support local livelihoods and international environmental goals, including coastal protection, biodiversity conservation and the sequestration of carbon (C). While voluntary C market projects seeking to preserve and enhance forest C stocks offer a potential means of generating finance for mangrove conservation, their implementation faces barriers due to the high costs of quantifying C stocks through field inventories. To streamline C quantification in mangrove conservation projects, we develop predictive models for (i) biomass-based C stocks, and (ii) soil-based C stocks for the mangroves of the Asia-Pacific. We compile datasets of mangrove biomass C (197 observations from 48 sites) and soil organic C (99 observations from 27 sites) to parameterize the predictive models, and use linear mixed effect models to model the expected C as a function of stand attributes. The most parsimonious biomass model predicts total biomass C stocks as a function of both basal area and the interaction between latitude and basal area, whereas the most parsimonious soil C model predicts soil C stocks as a function of the logarithmic transformations of both latitude and basal area. Random effects are specified by site for both models, which are found to explain a substantial proportion of variance within the estimation datasets and indicate significant heterogeneity across-sites within the region. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the biomass C model is approximated at 24.6 Mg/ha (18.4% of mean biomass C in the dataset), whereas the RMSE of the soil C model is estimated at 4.9 mg C/cm3 (14.1% of mean soil C). The results point to a need for standardization of forest metrics to facilitate meta-analyses, as well as provide important considerations for refining ecosystem C stock models in mangroves.

  11. How Is Machine Learning Used in Trading? (META Stock Forecast) (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Sep 2, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2022). How Is Machine Learning Used in Trading? (META Stock Forecast) (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2022/09/how-is-machine-learning-used-in-trading.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    How Is Machine Learning Used in Trading? (META Stock Forecast)

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  12. Meta's Market Momentum: Where Next? (META) (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Mar 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2024). Meta's Market Momentum: Where Next? (META) (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2024/03/metas-market-momentum-where-next-meta.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta's Market Momentum: Where Next? (META)

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  13. f

    Base learning device parameter value.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua (2025). Base learning device parameter value. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323737.t009
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This study analyzes 284 publicly listed companies first designated as ST or *ST between 2015 and 2023. It utilizes two types of textual indicators: Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and stock forum comments. PCA and MLP are employed for dimensionality reduction. The study compares the recognition performance of single-class models with ensemble learning models while also examining the impact of various base learners and meta-learners on the performance of the ensemble learning model. The findings show that using the two types of textual indicators significantly enhanced the model’s accuracy in recognition. The single-class and ensemble learning models demonstrated average improvements of 1.24% and 1.75%, respectively. Notably, stock forum comments outperformed MD&A text. Additionally, the MLP proved more effective in feature processing than PCA. The D-M-BSA-FT model achieved an accuracy of 88.89%. Ensemble learning models outperform single classification models. After introducing textual features, the ensemble learning model achieved an average recognition accuracy of 85.31%, compared to 82.09% for the single classification model. Therefore, the financial warning model developed in this study provides valuable insights for enhancing the accuracy of financial warning identification.

  14. Industry Distribution of ST and Non-ST Companies.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua (2025). Industry Distribution of ST and Non-ST Companies. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323737.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This study analyzes 284 publicly listed companies first designated as ST or *ST between 2015 and 2023. It utilizes two types of textual indicators: Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and stock forum comments. PCA and MLP are employed for dimensionality reduction. The study compares the recognition performance of single-class models with ensemble learning models while also examining the impact of various base learners and meta-learners on the performance of the ensemble learning model. The findings show that using the two types of textual indicators significantly enhanced the model’s accuracy in recognition. The single-class and ensemble learning models demonstrated average improvements of 1.24% and 1.75%, respectively. Notably, stock forum comments outperformed MD&A text. Additionally, the MLP proved more effective in feature processing than PCA. The D-M-BSA-FT model achieved an accuracy of 88.89%. Ensemble learning models outperform single classification models. After introducing textual features, the ensemble learning model achieved an average recognition accuracy of 85.31%, compared to 82.09% for the single classification model. Therefore, the financial warning model developed in this study provides valuable insights for enhancing the accuracy of financial warning identification.

  15. f

    Classification performance metrics of MLP.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua (2025). Classification performance metrics of MLP. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323737.t008
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This study analyzes 284 publicly listed companies first designated as ST or *ST between 2015 and 2023. It utilizes two types of textual indicators: Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and stock forum comments. PCA and MLP are employed for dimensionality reduction. The study compares the recognition performance of single-class models with ensemble learning models while also examining the impact of various base learners and meta-learners on the performance of the ensemble learning model. The findings show that using the two types of textual indicators significantly enhanced the model’s accuracy in recognition. The single-class and ensemble learning models demonstrated average improvements of 1.24% and 1.75%, respectively. Notably, stock forum comments outperformed MD&A text. Additionally, the MLP proved more effective in feature processing than PCA. The D-M-BSA-FT model achieved an accuracy of 88.89%. Ensemble learning models outperform single classification models. After introducing textual features, the ensemble learning model achieved an average recognition accuracy of 85.31%, compared to 82.09% for the single classification model. Therefore, the financial warning model developed in this study provides valuable insights for enhancing the accuracy of financial warning identification.

  16. f

    General Quan Differential Explanation.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua (2025). General Quan Differential Explanation. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323737.t007
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This study analyzes 284 publicly listed companies first designated as ST or *ST between 2015 and 2023. It utilizes two types of textual indicators: Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and stock forum comments. PCA and MLP are employed for dimensionality reduction. The study compares the recognition performance of single-class models with ensemble learning models while also examining the impact of various base learners and meta-learners on the performance of the ensemble learning model. The findings show that using the two types of textual indicators significantly enhanced the model’s accuracy in recognition. The single-class and ensemble learning models demonstrated average improvements of 1.24% and 1.75%, respectively. Notably, stock forum comments outperformed MD&A text. Additionally, the MLP proved more effective in feature processing than PCA. The D-M-BSA-FT model achieved an accuracy of 88.89%. Ensemble learning models outperform single classification models. After introducing textual features, the ensemble learning model achieved an average recognition accuracy of 85.31%, compared to 82.09% for the single classification model. Therefore, the financial warning model developed in this study provides valuable insights for enhancing the accuracy of financial warning identification.

  17. Meta's (MGX) Stock Expected to See Significant Growth Amid Gene Editing...

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Mar 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2025). Meta's (MGX) Stock Expected to See Significant Growth Amid Gene Editing Advancements (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2025/03/metas-mgx-stock-expected-to-see.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta's (MGX) Stock Expected to See Significant Growth Amid Gene Editing Advancements

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  18. Should You Buy META Right Now? (Stock Forecast) (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Oct 21, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2022). Should You Buy META Right Now? (Stock Forecast) (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2022/10/should-you-buy-meta-right-now-stock.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 21, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Should You Buy META Right Now? (Stock Forecast)

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  19. f

    37 financial indicators finalized.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua (2025). 37 financial indicators finalized. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323737.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Zhiheng Zhang; Zhenji Zhu; Yongjun Hua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This study analyzes 284 publicly listed companies first designated as ST or *ST between 2015 and 2023. It utilizes two types of textual indicators: Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and stock forum comments. PCA and MLP are employed for dimensionality reduction. The study compares the recognition performance of single-class models with ensemble learning models while also examining the impact of various base learners and meta-learners on the performance of the ensemble learning model. The findings show that using the two types of textual indicators significantly enhanced the model’s accuracy in recognition. The single-class and ensemble learning models demonstrated average improvements of 1.24% and 1.75%, respectively. Notably, stock forum comments outperformed MD&A text. Additionally, the MLP proved more effective in feature processing than PCA. The D-M-BSA-FT model achieved an accuracy of 88.89%. Ensemble learning models outperform single classification models. After introducing textual features, the ensemble learning model achieved an average recognition accuracy of 85.31%, compared to 82.09% for the single classification model. Therefore, the financial warning model developed in this study provides valuable insights for enhancing the accuracy of financial warning identification.

  20. Meta Malaise: AIU Stock Slumping Despite Strong Earnings? (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Feb 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2024). Meta Malaise: AIU Stock Slumping Despite Strong Earnings? (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2024/02/meta-malaise-aiu-stock-slumping-despite.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    Meta Malaise: AIU Stock Slumping Despite Strong Earnings?

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Meta monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2012-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1331143/meta-share-price-development-monthly/
Organization logo

Meta monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2012-2025

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 9, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
May 2012 - Jan 2025
Area covered
United States
Description

The price of Meta (former Facebook) shares traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange fluctuated significantly but increased overall during the period from May 2012 to January 2025. After peaking at ****** U.S. dollars per share in August 2021, the price of Meta shares started to fluctuate and exceeded its previous peak in 2025. The share price stood at ****** U.S. dollars as of the end of January 2025. Substantial fluctuations in the last few years Meta's stock prices have fluctuated particularly after the rebranding announcement in late 2021. Following the announcement and through 2022, Meta's revenue remained rather stagnant, and its net income decreased considerably. Moreover, the tech giant announced one of the industry's largest layoffs in late 2022. As a result, the share price hit a low of ***** U.S. dollars in October 2022, the lowest value observed since 2016. However, Meta's share price has been steadily recovering since then. Shift in strategy for the world’s first social network Meta has shifted its focus to the metaverse, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), with the rebranding in late 2021. As a result, Reality Labs was established as a dedicated business and research unit to focus on developing metaverse and AR/VR technologies. However, as of early 2023, Meta still relies mainly on advertising and its Family of Apps to generate most of its revenue, despite having made significant investments in virtual reality. Reality Labs generated *** billion U.S. dollars in revenue in 2024 and has been consistently incurring operating losses since 2019.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu