After over two years of public reporting, the State Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release was on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at CDC’s COVID Data Tracker. The State Profile Report (SPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, in collaboration with the White House. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The SPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for each state, down to the county level. It is a weekly snapshot in time that: Focuses on recent outcomes in the last seven days and changes relative to the month prior Provides additional contextual information at the county level for each state, and includes national level information Supports rapid visual interpretation of results with color thresholds

This dataset provides a single table of historical outbreak data as reported by public health departments to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services from August 22, 2020 to February 11, 2021. Additional information about the dataset and more current data tables can be found here: https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98163_98173_102057---,00.html.

United States COVID-19: No. of Deaths: To Date: Michigan data was reported at 44,728.000 Person in 12 Mar 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 44,654.000 Person for 11 Mar 2024. United States COVID-19: No. of Deaths: To Date: Michigan data is updated daily, averaging 33,752.000 Person from Jan 2020 (Median) to 12 Mar 2024, with 1512 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 44,728.000 Person in 12 Mar 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Person in 01 Mar 2020. United States COVID-19: No. of Deaths: To Date: Michigan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. The data is categorized under High Frequency Database’s Disease Outbreaks – Table US.D001: Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019).

This dataset tracks the updates made on the dataset "COVID-19 State Profile Report - Michigan" as a repository for previous versions of the data and metadata.

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS) is a program of state-wide surveys of local government leaders in Michigan. The MPPS is designed to fill an important information gap in the policymaking process. While there are ongoing surveys of the business community and of the citizens of Michigan, before the MPPS there were no ongoing surveys of local government officials that were representative of all general purpose local governments in the state. Therefore, while we knew the policy priorities and views of the state's businesses and citizens, we knew very little about the views of the local officials who are so important to the economies and community life throughout Michigan.The MPPS was launched in 2009 by the Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy (CLOSUP) at the University of Michigan and is conducted in partnership with the Michigan Association of Counties, Michigan Municipal League, and Michigan Townships Association. The associations provide CLOSUP with contact information for the survey's respondents, and consult on survey topics. CLOSUP makes all decisions on survey design, data analysis, and reporting, and receives no funding support from the associations.The surveys investigate local officials' opinions and perspectives on a variety of important public policy issues and solicit factual information about their localities relevant to policymaking. Over time, the program has covered issues such as fiscal, budgetary and operational policy, fiscal health, public sector compensation, workforce development, local-state governmental relations, intergovernmental collaboration, economic development strategies and initiatives such as placemaking and economic gardening, the role of local government in environmental sustainability, energy topics, trust in government, views on state policymaker performance, and more. The program will investigate many other issues relevant to local and state policy in the future. The Spring 2020 MPPS wave asked Michigan's local government leaders about the expected impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in their communities, how effectively various governments are coordinating efforts, what kinds of resources they need, how long they expect various impacts to last, and more. Additional questions on local government fiscal health, election administration, the 2020 U.S. Census, views on state policymaker performance, and more, were also asked. Responses to these questions will be available in a separate data collection available in 2021.

The COVID-19 Coping Study is a national, longitudinal cohort study of 6,938 US adults aged ≥55 enrolled from April 2nd through May 31st, 2020 in all 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Participants were recruited through a non-probability multi-frame sampling strategy, and completed data collection through online questionnaires administered via the University of Michigan Qualtrics in English (N=6,886) and Spanish (N=52). Data were collected on a variety of demographic, social, and health-related topics including COVID-19 symptom and testing history, COVID-19-related stressors and worries, self-isolation and social distancing practices, behavior changes and coping mechanisms, mental health symptom scales, and living arrangements. A sub-set of the baseline sample (N=4,401) were sent monthly follow-up questionnaires over the following 12 months. The included files contain baseline through 12-month of follow-up data from the COVID-19 Coping Study. Data are available in Stata (C19CS.dta), a CSV file with value labels (C19CS Labelled.csv), and a CSV file with numeric values (C19CS Numeric.csv). Open-ended questionnaire responses are not included in the data files, and the text for the open-ended questions is struck out in the PDF documentation of the monthly questionnaires.

United States SBP: Michigan (MI): COVID-19 Impact: Large Negative Effect data was reported at 21.800 % in 11 Apr 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 21.600 % for 04 Apr 2022. United States SBP: Michigan (MI): COVID-19 Impact: Large Negative Effect data is updated weekly, averaging 21.750 % from Nov 2021 (Median) to 11 Apr 2022, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 25.800 % in 13 Dec 2021 and a record low of 16.200 % in 27 Dec 2021. United States SBP: Michigan (MI): COVID-19 Impact: Large Negative Effect data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.S047: Small Business Pulse Survey: by State: Midwest Region: Weekly, Beg Monday (Discontinued).

Data published on potential COVID-19 symptoms reported through NHS Pathways and 111 online Dashboard shows the total number of NHS Pathways triages through 111 and 999, and online assessments in 111 online which have received a potential COVID-19 final disposition. This data is based on potential COVID-19 symptoms reported by members of the public to NHS Pathways through NHS 111 or 999 and 111 online, and is not based on the outcomes of tests for coronavirus. This is not a count of people.

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated equity issues in education spanning race, disability, language, and socio-economic status. However, few studies examine the ways that district or state educational leaders consider equity in their decision-making during a crisis. This study examines how K-12 state and local leaders conceptualized equity and actualized equitable policies and practices during the pandemic. We conducted a multi-level case study, interviewing state and local-level educational leaders (n=64) from five school districts in the state of Michigan. Our findings reveal that leaders formed equity visions focused on meeting students’ individual needs, which were enacted differently at the state and local levels. Interview questions focused on leaders’ priorities and efforts to support staff, students, and families during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, interview questions prompted leaders to share their specific approaches for promoting student learning and engagement amidst the pandemic, key collaborators in this work, relevant successes and challenges, and any initiatives designed to support specific student populations (e.g., English learners, students receiving special education services, etc.). Additional topics include reflections on any lessons learned about equity during the 2019-20 and 2020-21 school years, including how leaders' thoughts on equity may have shifted due to the pandemic.

United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: Upper Bound: Michigan data was reported at 2,000.000 Number in 16 Sep 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,990.000 Number for 09 Sep 2023. United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: Upper Bound: Michigan data is updated weekly, averaging 2,011.000 Number from Jan 2017 (Median) to 16 Sep 2023, with 350 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,176.000 Number in 18 Feb 2023 and a record low of 1,858.000 Number in 29 Jul 2017. United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: Upper Bound: Michigan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G012: Number of Excess Deaths: by States: All Causes excluding COVID-19: Predicted (Discontinued).

The New York Times is releasing a series of data files with cumulative counts of coronavirus cases in the United States, at the state and county level, over time. We are compiling this time series data from state and local governments and health departments in an attempt to provide a complete record of the ongoing outbreak.

Since late January, The Times has tracked cases of coronavirus in real time as they were identified after testing. Because of the widespread shortage of testing, however, the data is necessarily limited in the picture it presents of the outbreak.

We have used this data to power our maps and reporting tracking the outbreak, and it is now being made available to the public in response to requests from researchers, scientists and government officials who would like access to the data to better understand the outbreak.

The data begins with the first reported coronavirus case in Washington State on Jan. 21, 2020. We will publish regular updates to the data in this repository.

Characteristics of the three cohorts with genotype data, pre-COVID-19 datasetsb'*'.

United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: No. of Deaths: Michigan data was reported at 1,818.000 Number in 16 Sep 2023. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1,882.000 Number for 09 Sep 2023. United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: No. of Deaths: Michigan data is updated weekly, averaging 1,901.000 Number from Jan 2017 (Median) to 16 Sep 2023, with 350 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,435.000 Number in 04 Apr 2020 and a record low of 1,624.000 Number in 26 Aug 2017. United States Excess Deaths excl COVID: Predicted: No. of Deaths: Michigan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G012: Number of Excess Deaths: by States: All Causes excluding COVID-19: Predicted (Discontinued).

BackgroundMass vaccination serves as an effective strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine hesitancy is a recognized impediment to achieving a vaccination rate necessary to protect communities. However, solutions and interventions to address this issue are limited by a lack of prior research.MethodsOver 200 patients from 18 Michigan counties participated in this study. Each participant received an initial survey, including demographical questions and knowledge and opinion questions regarding COVID-19 and vaccines. Participants were randomly assigned an educational intervention in either video or infographic format. Patients received a post-survey to assess changes in knowledge and attitudes. Paired sample t-tests and ANOVA were used to measure the effectiveness of the educational interventions. Participants also elected to complete a 3-month follow-up survey.ResultsPatients showed increased knowledge after the educational intervention in six out of seven COVID-19 topics (p 

This file contains COVID-19 death counts and rates by month and year of death, jurisdiction of residence (U.S., HHS Region) and demographic characteristics (sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, and age/race and Hispanic origin). United States death counts and rates include the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia. Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1. Number of deaths reported in this file are the total number of COVID-19 deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and may not represent all deaths that occurred in that period. Counts of deaths occurring before or after the reporting period are not included in the file. Data during recent periods are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction and cause of death. Death counts should not be compared across jurisdictions. Data timeliness varies by state. Some states report deaths on a daily basis, while other states report deaths weekly or monthly. The ten (10) United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions include the following jurisdictions. Region 1: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; Region 2: New Jersey, New York; Region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia; Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee; Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin; Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas; Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska; Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming; Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada; Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington. Rates were calculated using the population estimates for 2021, which are estimated as of July 1, 2021 based on the Blended Base produced by the US Census Bureau in lieu of the April 1, 2020 decennial population count. The Blended Base consists of the blend of Vintage 2020 postcensal population estimates, 2020 Demographic Analysis Estimates, and 2020 Census PL 94-171 Redistricting File (see https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2020-2021/methods-statement-v2021.pdf). Rate are based on deaths occurring in the specified week and are age-adjusted to the 2000 standard population using the direct method (see https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-08-508.pdf). These rates differ from annual age-adjusted rates, typically presented in NCHS publications based on a full year of data and annualized weekly age-adjusted rates which have been adjusted to allow comparison with annual rates. Annualization rates presents deaths per year per 100,000 population that would be expected in a year if the observed period specific (weekly) rate prevailed for a full year. Sub-national death counts between 1-9 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS data confidentiality standards. Rates based on death counts less than 20 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS standards of reliability as specified in NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions (available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_175.pdf.).

Sample Sizes and Ancestry of Studies in COVID-19 HGI GWAS Meta-Analysis "B1_ALL".

United States CCI: Michigan data was reported at 98.500 1985=100 in Apr 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 88.600 1985=100 for Mar 2025. United States CCI: Michigan data is updated monthly, averaging 92.600 1985=100 from Feb 2007 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 219 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 151.100 1985=100 in Dec 2019 and a record low of 11.900 1985=100 in Mar 2009. United States CCI: Michigan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Conference Board. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.H049: Consumer Confidence Index. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the median household income in Michigan City. It can be utilized to understand the trend in median household income and to analyze the income distribution in Michigan City by household type, size, and across various income brackets.

Content

The dataset will have the following datasets when applicable

Please note: The 2020 1-Year ACS estimates data was not reported by the Census Bureau due to the impact on survey collection and analysis caused by COVID-19. Consequently, median household income data for 2020 is unavailable for large cities (population 65,000 and above).

• Michigan City, IN Median Household Income Trends (2010-2021, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
• Median Household Income Variation by Family Size in Michigan City, IN: Comparative analysis across 7 household sizes
• Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in Michigan City, IN
• Michigan City, IN households by income brackets: family, non-family, and total, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Interested in deeper insights and visual analysis?

Explore our comprehensive data analysis and visual representations for a deeper understanding of Michigan City median household income. You can refer the same here

Mendelian randomization analysis for the effect of smoking initiation or cigarettes consumed per day on COVID-19 severity or COVID-19 susceptibility.

Continuous CO2 data from from a Lake Michigan collected during 2017-2019 and in 2021. No samples were collected in 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The sampling system is mounted in the engine room of the Lake Express high-speed ferry, where it draws water from a sea chest that has a residence time of several seconds.