18 datasets found
  1. K

    Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Sep 19, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2018). Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97418-oakland-county-michigan-lot-lines/
    Explore at:
    kml, geodatabase, pdf, csv, geopackage / sqlite, shapefile, mapinfo mif, mapinfo tab, dwgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 19, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    Geospatial data about Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

  2. House Street Property Outline

    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    • gis-egle.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (2023). House Street Property Outline [Dataset]. https://gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/egle::house-street-property-outline
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energyhttp://michigan.gov/egle/
    Authors
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
    Area covered
    Description

    Parcel boundary from Kent County GIS Data Library, available at https://www.accesskent.com/GISLibrary/.This data is used in the North Kent Disposal Area PFAS web map. If you have questions regarding the North Kent Disposal Area site contact Karen Vorce at 616-439-8008 or vorcek@michigan.gov.

  3. D

    Property Gateway

    • detroitdata.org
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 28, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2017). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/property-gateway3
    Explore at:
    html, arcgis geoservices rest apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 28, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Property Gateway is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. Reports and maps can be purchased via a credit card transaction; recurring users request a business account. Visit Property Gateway, HERE.

  4. D

    Right of Way Street and Alley Vacations

    • detroitdata.org
    Updated Jan 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2025). Right of Way Street and Alley Vacations [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/right-of-way-street-and-alley-vacations
    Explore at:
    txt, gpkg, gdb, zip, xlsx, arcgis geoservices rest api, csv, geojson, kml, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    City of Detroit
    Description

    This data is intended as a reference material of street and alley vacations, but not designed for survey, accurate positioning, or legal documents. It is created as polygon feature class, vacation information based on field measurements, types of Right of Way, and citations of Journal of the Common Council (J.C.C.) and the plat Liber and Page is listed under the column titled 'Sub_Plat'. The paper maps of the Street and Alley Vacation, the raster layer version of those maps (Linen Map Markup Mosaic), and the Detroit parcel layer are used as base maps to create this data.

    The street and alley vacations were recorded from 1831 to 2022 throughout the whole city, and it will be updated weekly. The existed and/or active street and alley vacations are ready to view, the authors are working on pending and historical records.

    Red Features - Have been "Outright" vacated, meaning the right of way has become private property with no restrictions.
    Blue Features - Have been vacated with reserve of a utility easement, meaning the right of way has become private property with access rights for utility companies.

    Spatial Reference: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere

    *Note: Special values within the 'Jurisdiction' field:
    • "2" means that the feature was approved under Jurisdiction of Wayne County, the State of Michigan, or a Township that was annexed by the City of Detroit, No City record on file.
    • "1" means that the feature was approved under City of Detroit jurisdiction.
    • "0" means the feature was approved per circuit court decision. No City record on file.
    For more information please visit the Maps and Records website.

  5. a

    Michigan Forest Land Ownership 2019

    • usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 14, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2021). Michigan Forest Land Ownership 2019 [Dataset]. https://usfs.hub.arcgis.com/maps/f1a15650f89f4da794030f65044f7ef9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Forest Service
    Area covered
    Description

    This geospatial dataset depicts ownership patterns of forest land across Michigan, circa 2019. The data sources are listed below. The first seven sources of data supersede the final data source. The final data source is modeled from Forest Inventory and Analysis points from 2012-2017 and the most up-to-date publicly available boundaries of federal, state, and tribal lands.1.MI_State_Boundary_Census_Gov_2019.shp (State of MI boundary) clipped from cb_2019_us_state_500k from https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/cartographic-boundary.html2.NPS_Land_Resources_Division_MI.shp clipped from NPS_-_Land_Resources_Division_Boundary_and_Tract_Data_Service-shp taken from https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/nps-land-resources-division-boundary-and-tract-data-service/data?layer=1Published December 12, 2019This service depicts National Park Service tract and boundary data that was created by the Land Resources Division. NPS Director's Order #25 states: "Land status maps will be prepared to identify the ownership of the lands within the authorized boundaries of the park unit. These maps, showing ownership and acreage, are the 'official record' of the acreage of Federal and non-federal lands within the park boundaries. While these maps are the official record of the lands and acreage within the unit's authorized boundaries, they are not of survey quality and not intended to be used for survey purposes." As such this data is intended for use as a tool for GIS analysis. It is in no way intended for engineering or legal purposes. The data accuracy is checked against best available sources which may be dated and vary by location. NPS assumes no liability for use of this data. The boundary polygons represent the current legislated boundary of a given NPS unit. NPS does not necessarily have full fee ownership or hold another interest (easement, right of way, etc...) in all parcels contained within this boundary. Equivalently NPS may own or have an interest in parcels outside the legislated boundary of a given unit. In order to obtain complete information about current NPS interests both inside and outside a unit’s legislated boundary tract level polygons are also created by NPS Land Resources Division and should be used in conjunction with this boundary data. To download this data directly from the NPS go to https://irma.nps.gov/App/Portal/Home Property ownership data is compiled from deeds, plats, surveys, and other source data. These are not engineering quality drawings and should be used for administrative purposes only. The National Park Service (NPS) shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an NPS server and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Park Service, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. Terms of UseProperty ownership data is compiled from deeds, plats, surveys, and other source data. These are not engineering quality drawings and should be used for administrative purposes only. The National Park Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an NPS server and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Park Service, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data.3.Isle Royale.shp only Isle Royale clipped from MI_State_Boundary_Census_Gov_2019.shp4.FWSInterest_MI.shp (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) clipped from FWSInterest from FWSInterest_Apr2020.zipfrom https://www.fws.gov/gis/data/CadastralDB/index_cadastral.html (being moved on 6/26/2020)Use inttype1 = OThis data layer depicts lands and waters administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in North America, U.S. Trust Territories and Possessions. It may also include inholdings that are not administered by USFWS. The primary source for this information is the USFWS Realty program.5.surfaceownership_MI.shp (U.S. National Forest Service) clipped from S_USA.SurfaceOwnership.gdb and downloaded fromhttps://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.phphttps://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=surfaceownershiprefreshed May 26, 2020Used NFSLandU_4 field and surfaceO_3 and surfaceO_3 to identify NFS parcelsAn area depicting ownership parcels of the surface estate. Each surface ownership parcel is tied to a particular legal transaction. The same individual or organization may currently own many parcels that may or may not have been acquired through the same legal transaction. Therefore, they are captured as separate entities rather than merged together. This is in contrast to Basic Ownership, in which the surface ownership parcels having the same owner are merged together. Basic Ownership provides the general user with the Forest Service versus non-Forest Service view of land ownership within National Forest boundaries. Surface Ownership provides the land status user with a current snapshot of ownership within National Forest boundaries.6.MichiganDNR_02062020.shp (State of Michigan) from the State of MI delivered @ email on 5/14/2020Has State forests, State Wildlife areas, and State parks.7.The previous public ownership layers supersede this Sass et al. (2020) layer.In Sass et al. (2020), the nonforest areas are masked out.Identification_Information:Citation:Citation_Information:Originator: Sass, Emma M.Originator: Butler, Brett J.Originator: Markowski-Lindsay, Marla Publication_Date: 2020Title:Estimated distribution of forest ownership across the conterminous United States – geospatial datasetGeospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital dataPublication_Information:Publication_Place: Fort Collins, COPublisher: Forest Service Research Data ArchiveEight values of ownership type:1 = Family (Private): Owned by families, individuals, trusts, estates, family partnerships, and other unincorporated groups of individuals that own forest land. FIACode 45.2 = Corporate (Private): Owned by corporations. FIA Code 41.3 = TIMO/REIT (Private): Owned by Timber Investment Management Organizations or Real Estate Investment Trusts. Included in FIA Code 414 = Other Private (Private): Owned by conservation and natural resource organizations, unincorporated partnerships and associations. FIA Codes 42-43.5 = Federal (Public): Owned by the federal government. FIA Codes 11-13, 21-25.6 = State (Public): Owned by a state government. FIA Code 31.7 = Local (Public): Owned by a local government. FIA Code 32.8 = Tribal: Owned by Native American tribes. FIA Code 44.8.FIA inventory units developed by FIA, 2020

  6. o

    Property Gateway

    • accessoakland.oakgov.com
    • detroitdata.org
    • +3more
    Updated Apr 23, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2013). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://accessoakland.oakgov.com/datasets/property-gateway
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 23, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

  7. d

    ADMMR mining collection file: Michigan Verde

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    pdf
    Updated Jul 31, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources (2013). ADMMR mining collection file: Michigan Verde [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/60e2067c38564247ae947a7f886083c4/html
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 31, 2013
    Authors
    Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources
    Area covered
    Description

    This location is part of the Arizona Mineral Industry Location System (AzMILS), an inventory of mineral occurences, prospects and mine locations in Arizona. Yavapai580B is located in T16N R2E Sec 28 NE in the Hickey Mountain - 7.5 Min quad. This collection consists of various reports, maps, records and related materials acquired by the Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources regarding mining properties in Arizona. Information was obtained by various means, including the property owners, exploration companies, consultants, verbal interviews, field visits, newspapers and publications. Some sections may be redacted for copyright. Please see the access statement.

  8. a

    UMBS Property Lines

    • um-biological-station-umich.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 4, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    University of Michigan (2018). UMBS Property Lines [Dataset]. https://um-biological-station-umich.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/umbs-property-lines-3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 4, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    University of Michigan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    BioStation_Property_2017Apr13

  9. D

    Neighborhood Enterprise Zones - Homestead (NEZ-H), 2006-2021

    • detroitdata.org
    • data.detroitmi.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Apr 2, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2024). Neighborhood Enterprise Zones - Homestead (NEZ-H), 2006-2021 [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/neighborhood-enterprise-zones-homestead-nez-h-2006-2021
    Explore at:
    html, kml, arcgis geoservices rest api, csv, geojson, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 2, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    City of Detroit
    Description
    The Neighborhood Enterprise Zones - Homestead (NEZ-H), 2006-2021 dataset was replaced with NEZ-H boundaries that were modified on June 15, 2021. This original historic dataset consists of NEZ-H district boundaries that were initially created between July 2006 and July 2008. NEZ-Homestead is a tax abatement program intended to stimulate investment in existing residential structures. Within NEZ-Homestead Districts, residential property owners who occupy their homes as a principal residence and meet other program requirements are eligible to file for a tax abatement. NEZ-Homestead differs from NEZ (also referred to as NEZ-NR) in that the Homestead program covers pre-existing residential property only. In contrast, NEZ-NR covers new facilities and/or rehabilitated facility projects. NEZ-Homestead and NEZ-NR programs are administered jointly by the City of Detroit and the State of Michigan under Michigan's Neighborhood Enterprise Zone (NEZ) Act, PA 147 of 1992 as amended. See the NEZ Changelog “NEZ-H District Boundary Update” document for details on modifications to the dataset that occurred through August 17, 2018.

    Current NEZ-H district boundaries are available in the Neighborhood Enterprise Zones - Homestead (NEZ-H), Current dataset.
  10. f

    Property Sales

    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • detroitdata.org
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 10, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2023). Property Sales [Dataset]. https://data.ferndalemi.gov/maps/detroitmi::property-sales-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 10, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Detroit
    Area covered
    Description

    The Office of the Assessor compiles property sales data to perform an annual property sales study to adjust calculated costs of property values based on local market conditions. This dataset includes property sales data obtained for annual sales studies from 2018 to the present. While only Valid Arm's Length transactions that occurred in the two years prior to when a given sales study is finalized are included in each study, this dataset inlcudes all sales transactions obtained to perform the sales studies, whether or not the sales transactions met inclusion criteria for a study. More information about the Sales Study is available from the Office of the Assessor.Values in categorical fields such as 'Sales Instrument' are recorded based on State of Michigan CAMA standards at the time the value was recorded. Some variation in field value codes occurs over time as a related CAMA standard is updated. CAMA standards are available from the State of Michigan Department of Treasury State Tax Commission. Click here for the Analytics Hub visualization of Property Sales.

  11. D

    NEZ NR Districts

    • detroitdata.org
    • data.detroitmi.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2024). NEZ NR Districts [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/nez-nr-districts
    Explore at:
    zip, geojson, arcgis geoservices rest api, html, csv, kmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 2, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    City of Detroit
    Description

    The NEZ-NR Districts dataset contains the Neighborhood Enterprise Zones district boundaries applicable to New and Rehabilitated facility projects. NEZ-NR districts are the original NEZ districts. NEZ is a tax abatement program intended to stimulate investment in designated areas of the city. NEZ-NR differs from NEZ-Homestead in that NEZ-NR covers new facilities and/or rehabilitated facility projects. In contrast, the NEZ-H program covers pre-existing residential property inhabited by owner-occupants only. NEZ-NR and NEZ-Homestead programs are administered jointly by the City of Detroit and the State of Michigan under Michigan's Neighborhood Enterprise Zone (NEZ) Act, PA 147 of 1992 as amended.

    A record of district and dataset modifications from 1992-2017 is noted in the NEZ-NR District Boundary Update document available from the NEZ NR Changelog.

  12. d

    Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US)

    • search.dataone.org
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 26, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    US Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP) (2017). Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/0459986b-9a0e-41d9-9997-cad0fbea9c4e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    US Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2005 - Jan 1, 2016
    Area covered
    United States,
    Variables measured
    Shape, Access, Des_Nm, Des_Tp, Loc_Ds, Loc_Nm, Agg_Src, GAPCdDt, GAP_Sts, GIS_Src, and 20 more
    Description

    The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public open space and voluntarily provided, private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastral Theme (http://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html). PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database of areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural, recreational or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase maps and describes public open space and other protected areas. Most areas are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, and agreements or administrative designations documented in agency management plans may be included. The PAD-US database strives to be a complete “best available” inventory of protected areas (lands and waters) including data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The dataset is built in collaboration with several partners and data providers (http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/stewards/). See Supplemental Information Section of this metadata record for more information on partnerships and links to major partner organizations. As this dataset is a compilation of many data sets; data completeness, accuracy, and scale may vary. Federal and state data are generally complete, while local government and private protected area coverage is about 50% complete, and depends on data management capacity in the state. For completeness estimates by state: http://www.protectedlands.net/partners. As the federal and state data are reasonably complete; focus is shifting to completing the inventory of local gov and voluntarily provided, private protected areas. The PAD-US geodatabase contains over twenty-five attributes and four feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services and analyses: Marine Protected Areas (MPA), Fee, Easements and Combined. The data contained in the MPA Feature class are provided directly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA, http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov ) tracking the National Marine Protected Areas System. The Easements feature class contains data provided directly from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED, http://conservationeasement.us ) The MPA and Easement feature classes contain some attributes unique to the sole source databases tracking them (e.g. Easement Holder Name from NCED, Protection Level from NOAA MPA Inventory). The "Combined" feature class integrates all fee, easement and MPA features as the best available national inventory of protected areas in the standard PAD-US framework. In addition to geographic boundaries, PAD-US describes the protection mechanism category (e.g. fee, easement, designation, other), owner and managing agency, designation type, unit name, area, public access and state name in a suite of standardized fields. An informative set of references (i.e. Aggregator Source, GIS Source, GIS Source Date) and "local" or source data fields provide a transparent link between standardized PAD-US fields and information from authoritative data sources. The areas in PAD-US are also assigned conservation measures that assess management intent to permanently protect biological diversity: the nationally relevant "GAP Status Code" and global "IUCN Category" standard. A wealth of attributes facilitates a wide variety of data analyses and creates a context for data to be used at local, regional, state, national and international scales. More information about specific updates and changes to this PAD-US version can be found in the Data Quality Information section of this metadata record as well as on the PAD-US website, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/history/.) Due to the completeness and complexity of these data, it is highly recommended to review the Supplemental Information Section of the metadata record as well as the Data Use Constraints, to better understand data partnerships as well as see tips and ideas of appropriate uses of the data and how to parse out the data that you are looking for. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/. To find more data resources as well as view example analysis performed using PAD-US data visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/resources/. The PAD-US dataset and data standard are compiled and maintained by the USGS Gap Analysis Program, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ . For more information about data standards and how the data are aggregated please review the “Standards and Methods Manual for PAD-US,” http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/standards/ .

  13. U

    Density and magnetic susceptibility measurements on Precambrian rocks in the...

    • data.usgs.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jun 29, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eric Anderson; Benjamin Drenth; Laurel Woodruff; William Cannon; Klaus Schulz (2023). Density and magnetic susceptibility measurements on Precambrian rocks in the Iron Mountain-Menominee region, Michigan-Wisconsin [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/P9NE2ACV
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 29, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Eric Anderson; Benjamin Drenth; Laurel Woodruff; William Cannon; Klaus Schulz
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Oct 1, 2015 - Oct 1, 2019
    Area covered
    Wisconsin, Michigan
    Description

    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collected rock physical property measurements to help understand causative sources of gravity and magnetic survey anomalies in the Iron Mountain-Menominee region, Michigan-Wisconsin. A total of 2,356 measurements of magnetic susceptibility and density from 152 locations have been conducted on Precambrian rocks. The measurements aid in interpretation of newly acquired ground-based gravity and airborne magnetic data that are helping to understand concealed Precambrian geology and potential mineral resources. Multiple measurements were made at each location and sample lithology units were derived from existing USGS geologic maps noted in the supplemental information section of the metadata file. However, if no formal unit name exists, the rock lithology determined in the field were recorded. For outcrop measurements, sample locations were determined using handheld Global Position System units. Measurements from drill core samples at the State of Mich ...

  14. a

    OC Development Authority

    • accessoakland-oakgov.opendata.arcgis.com
    • detroitdata.org
    • +5more
    Updated Oct 16, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Development Authority [Dataset]. https://accessoakland-oakgov.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/oc-development-authority
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. The DevelopmentAuthority polygon feature class identifies certain types of entities that encourage development/redevelopment in designated areas. This feature class currently represents Downtown Development Authorities (DDA), Tax Increment Finance Authorities (TIFA), and Local Development Finance Authorities (LDFA); however, it will also depict Corridor Improvement Authorities (CIA) and Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities (BRA) in the future. These five types of authorities have the ability to capture tax increment financing (TIF). The features were digitized using legal descriptions, parcel lists, and maps that were provided to the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal and/or Oakland County Equalization by the authority. The key attributes are Name (official name of the authority), Type (the type of development authority), and DevelopmentPlan (yes/no indicating if the feature represents an area that is part of a development plan and can caputre tax increment financing).Tax Increment Financing is a tool used to promote redevelopment and community improvement projects by channeling funding toward projects in targeted areas. TIF is captured from the increase of property values from a base year. Millage rates from taxing jurisdictions are applied to the increased value. The resulting tax revenue is directed to the authority, rather than the appropriate jurisdiction. Beginning in 1994, taxing jurisdictions have the option to "opt out" of having its taxes captured by the authority. Also since 1994, school taxes may no longer be captured unless they are necessary to make payments on existing eligible obligations. For more information about TIF, see Michigan Department of Treasury's Tax Increment Financing FAQ web page at http://www.michigan.gov/treasury/0,1607,7-121-3218---F,00.html. The State of Michigan has adopted enabling legislation to allow TIF through five types of authorities. Each type of authority has a focus relating to development/redevelopment: Downtown Development Authority (PA 197 of 1975) Correct and prevent deterioration in business districtsEncourage historic preservationPromote economic growth of the districts Tax Increment Finance Authority (PA 450 of 1980)Prevent urban deteriorationEncourage economic development and activityEncourage neighborhood revitalization and historic preservationClosed to new applicants since 1987Allows the development of virtually any type of land use Local Development Finance Authority (PA 281 of 1986)Encourage local developmentPromote conditions of employmentPromote economic growthLimited to business activities involving:ManufacturingAgricultural processingHigh-technology activitiesEnergy productionBusiness incubators Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (PA 381 of 1996)Promote revitalization, redevelopment, and reuse of certain propertyFocus on tax reverted, blighted, or functionally obsolete propertyMDEQ must approve brownfield redevelopment areas Corridor Improvement Authority (PA 281 of 2005)Correct and prevent deterioration in business districtsEncourage historic preservationPromote economic growth of the districtsMust be adjacent to a road classified as an arterial or collectorThese quasi-public entities are created by resolution through a community's governing body. CIA and LDFA boundaries may cross municipal boundaries. In the case of these multi-jurisdictional authorities, both communities must pass resolutions establishing authority. There is currently only one Joint LDFA (Cities of Southfield and Troy) and there are no CIAs in Oakland County. When the community establishes the authority, it must also define the geographic boundaries in which it will operate. DDAs and CIAs are authorized to levy and collect taxes through a special assessment on all properties within the authority boundary. After the authority and its boundaries are established, the authority creates a tax increment financing and development plan. The plan estimates the amount of tax increment financing that will be captured and lists specific projects on which it will be spent. It also defines the development area where the tax increment financing and projects will occur. The development area must be completely within the authority boundary; however, it may be coincident with the authority boundary. An authority may contain multiple development areas, each with its own development and tax increment financing plan. BRAs normally designate development areas as a one or two parcels for a specific development project, while the other types of authorities define development areas as a larger area. Also, LDFAs are only allowed to capture TIF from parcels in a permitted use, such as manufacturing. There may be both eliglible and inelgible parcels within a development area; however, the inelgible parcels do not participate in TIF capture. The base year used to calculate the amount of tax increment financing is set when the development plan is adopted. If the development plan is expanded at a later date, the base year could be reset for the entire development area or the capture could be calculated using multiple base years. The source for the base year was the tax billing code used by Oakland County Equalization. When no tax billing code was available (for communities that don't use the county's assessing system), the community was contacted to obtain the base year. When two separate authorities overlap, each authority can establish overlapping development areas. The authority that first created the development area has first claim on tax increment financing capture. Authority boundaries are represented using multiple features when the development area is not coincident with the authority boundary. One feature represents the development area and a second feature represents the remainder of the authority district that is not part of the development area. Multiple features are also used to represent authorities that have multiple development areas or development areas that have multiple base years. Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities are unique in that the authority boundaries are generally defined as the entire municipality. For this reason, the non-development areas of BRA's have been excluded from this data. The following list shows communities in Oakland County that have established a BRA: City of Auburn Hills City of Birmingham City of Farmington City of Farmington Hills City of Ferndale City of Hazel Park Charter Township of Highland Village of Holly City of Madison Heights Village of Milford County of Oakland City of Oak Park City of Pontiac City of Rochester City of Rochester Hills Charter Twp of Royal Oak City of Royal Oak City of Southfield City of Troy Charter Township of Waterford Source documents for the boundary of each feature were obtained from the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal, Oakland County Equalization, and the Oakland County Treasurer's office. These could be in the form of a legal description, parcel list, and/or map. For several boundaries, multiple sources were available and conflicted with each other. When this occurred, hierarchy was given to the legal description, then a parcel list, over the map, and the conflict is noted in the Comments field. However, if a parcel was shown in a parcel list, but not described in the authority based on the legal description, then it was still shown in the authority.It should also be noted that legal descriptions were not digitized using exact coordinate geometry. Instead, features were created by referencing the legal description to snap vertices to parcels, right-of-way, section corners, subdivisions, and lots. Features digitized from a legal description or map included road and railroad rights-of-way as it was described or shown in the document.For vague legal descriptions and parcel lists, right-of-way was addressed uniquely for each authority. Some source documents had statements that all or half of the surrounding right-of-way is to be included in the boundary, but some did not address right-of-way at all. In these cases, right-of-way was addressed distinctly for each authority based on the type of authority and the source documents with the method used recorded in the Comments field. The data will be updated on an "as needed" basis when authorities amend their development plans or new authorities are established. Oakland County Equalization and the Oakland County Treasurer's Office will notify and forward the source documents of necessary revisions to Oakland County Planning and Economic Development Services who is the custodian of the feature class. Communities will be contacted annually to verify that the districts have not changed without the knowledge of county departments. In particular, county departments may not be aware of BRA development projects when no TIF is captured. Lastly, because the tax parcel feature class is revised periodically and it is important for the features to be coincident with the tax parcel feature class, the development authority feature class will also be updated annually to correct conflicts due to parcel shifting.

  15. a

    MDOT Real Estate Polygons

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Department of Transportation (2024). MDOT Real Estate Polygons [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/mdot::mdot-real-estate-polygons
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Michigan Department of Transportation
    Area covered
    Description

    Visit Real Estate Services (michigan.gov) for more information.

  16. a

    Gelman Site of 1,4-Dioxane Contamination - Gelman Property Boundary...

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 14, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (2021). Gelman Site of 1,4-Dioxane Contamination - Gelman Property Boundary (approximate) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/128d7b107d72492ead9dc5790a11a8d1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 14, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
    Area covered
    Description

    Approximate property boundary of Gelman Sciences, Inc. The polygon was created based on select parcels from parcel layer obtained by EGLE (MDEQ_Parcel_PRO_EXP_PZ.shp) and provided to The Mannik and Smith Group for processing. The purpose of this layer is to show property owned by Gelman related to the Gelman Sciences, Inc./ Pall Life Sciences Inc. (Gelman) Site of 1,4-dioxane Contamination. The source of the parcel lines are approximate and should not be used for any legal purposes.This data is used in the Gelman Site of 1,4-Dioxane Contamination web map (item details). If you have questions regarding the Gelman Sciences, Inc site of contamination contact Dan Hamel at 517-745-6595 or HamelD@michigan.gov. Report problems or data functionality suggestions to EGLE-Maps@Michigan.gov.

  17. a

    Michigan Sand and Gravel Operations

    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (2024). Michigan Sand and Gravel Operations [Dataset]. https://gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/egle::michigan-sand-and-gravel-operations
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 22, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
    Area covered
    Description

    The data included in this map is one of many inventories created historically from a variety of sources, including but not limited to MDOT inventories. Data was last updated by the MDNR, Land and Mineral Services Division, Resource Mapping and Aerial Photography Section in 2001. This data is known to be out of date.For more information, visit Michigan.gov/EGLE/Maps-Data/GeoWebFace or contact EGLE-GeoWebFace@michigan.gov.

        Field Name
        Field Descriptions
    
    
        OBJECTID
        ESRI ID Number
    
    
        CountyName
        County Name
    
    
        Range
        Range number and direction
    
    
        Township
        Township number and direction
    
    
        Section
        Section number
    
    
        QtrQtr
        Quarter Quarter
    
    
        Qtr
        Quarter
    
    
        GeoID
        Combination of PLSS info
    
    
        Legal
        The legal description of the property.
    
    
        PitNumber
        Pit number given and used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.
    
    
        PitName
        Pit name given and used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.
    
    
        Producer
        The last aggregate producer in the pit at time of publishing.
    
    
        Directions
        Driving directions for site.
    
    
        Remarks
        Additive information provided at the time of data entry.
    
    
        Longitude
        Longitude Coordinates
    
    
        Latitude
        Latitude Coordinates
    
  18. Michigan PFAS Sites and Areas of Interest

    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    • gis-egle.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (2025). Michigan PFAS Sites and Areas of Interest [Dataset]. https://gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/egle::michigan-pfas-sites-and-areas-of-interest
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energyhttp://michigan.gov/egle/
    Authors
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
    Area covered
    Description

    As of March 2021, a PFAS site is defined as a property where EGLE has a valid groundwater monitoring well sample result that exceeds one or more of Michigan's seven PFAS groundwater cleanup criteria, and based on data, EGLE has determined the property is the location of the source of PFAS contamination (e.g., fire training area where PFAS-containing foam was used).An area of interest is a general location identified where PFAS contamination is potentially in groundwater and may be impacting private drinking water wells. Areas of interest are evolving investigations with potentially expanding boundaries. Data is gathered and boundaries are expanded as necessary. This map represents areas of interest using point locations to approximate general areas. These points do not indicate precise locations and are meant for reference purposes only. Users should not assume that the point location fully represents the extent or specific limits of the area it symbolizes. For detailed spatial information, please contact the Area of Interest lead listed in the dataset.This data is live and updated as new PFAS sites or areas of interest are encountered.This data is used in the MPART: PFAS Geographic Information System (item details). For more information, please visit our State of Michigan PFAS Response website. For content related questions reach out to the site lead contact listed in the dataset. Submit feedback please reach out to EGLE-Maps@Michigan.gov.Field NameField DescriptionSiteOrAoiIf the record is considered a site or an area of interestNameName of the site or area of interestAddressPhysical address of the project siteCityCity where the project is physically locatedZipCodeZip code where the project is physically locatedCountyCounty where the site is physically locatedTypeDescribes the kind of site by typeResidentialWellsSampledIndicates whether residential wells have, or will be sampled (Domains = Yes, No, TBD, N/A)SiteLeadName of contact personSiteLeadEmailContact person emailSiteLeadPhoneContact person phone numberWebpageSiteURL to the site investigation summaryWebpageAdditionalFilesURL to additional files related to the siteLongitudeX coordinate of the locationLatitudeY coordinate of the locationFacilityDateDate the site was published on the MPART website

  19. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Oakland County, Michigan (2018). Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97418-oakland-county-michigan-lot-lines/

Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines

Explore at:
kml, geodatabase, pdf, csv, geopackage / sqlite, shapefile, mapinfo mif, mapinfo tab, dwgAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Sep 19, 2018
Dataset authored and provided by
Oakland County, Michigan
Area covered
Description

Geospatial data about Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu