Graph and download economic data for Real Median Household Income in New York (MEHOINUSNYA672N) from 1984 to 2024 about NY, households, median, income, real, and USA.

A dataset listing the richest zip codes in New York per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Amherst, New York, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 18,852, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 296,153. This indicates that the top earners earn 16 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 495,426, which is 167.29% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 2627.98% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Amherst town median household income. You can refer the same here

In 2024, the median household income in the United States was 83,730 U.S. dollars. This reflected an increase from the previous year. Household income The median household income depicts the income of households, including the income of the householder and all other individuals aged 15 years or over living in the household. Income includes wages and salaries, unemployment insurance, disability payments, child support payments received, regular rental receipts, as well as any personal business, investment, or other kinds of income received routinely. The median household income in the United States varied from state to state. In 2024, Massachusetts recorded the highest median household income in the country, at 113,900 U.S. dollars. On the other hand, Mississippi, recorded the lowest, at 55,980 U.S. dollars.Household income is also used to determine the poverty rate in the United States. In 2024, 10.6 percent of the U.S. population was living below the national poverty line. This was the lowest level since 2019. Similarly, the child poverty rate, which represents people under the age of 18 living in poverty, reached a three-decade low of 14.3 percent of the children. The state with the widest gap between the rich and the poor was New York, with a Gini coefficient score of 0.52 in 2024. The Gini coefficient is calculated by looking at average income rates. A score of zero would reflect perfect income equality, while a score of one indicates complete inequality.

This poll, fielded April 1-5, 2009, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling the presidency and issues such as the economy and foreign policy. A series of questions addressed the Obama Administration's approach to solving economic problems and whether the administration's policies favored the rich, the middle class, or the poor. Respondents gave their opinions of First Lady Michelle Obama, the United States Congress, the Republican and Democratic parties, and whether President Obama or the Republicans in Congress were more likely to make the right decisions about the national economy and national security. Views were sought on President Obama's proposed budget plan, including changes in federal income taxes and government spending, and proposals to give financial assistance to the banking and automotive industries. A series of questions addressed the condition of the national economy, the most important economic problem facing the nation, the financial situation of the respondent's household, and how the recession was affecting their life. Respondents compared their current standard of living with that of their parents at the same age and gave their expectations about the standard of living of their children. Other questions asked respondents what the phrase "American dream" meant to them and whether they had achieved the "American dream" or expected to in their lifetime. Additional topics addressed the bonuses given to AIG insurance company executives, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, international trade, health insurance coverage, and government spending on cancer research. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, marital status, household income, employment status, perceived social class, political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status and participation history, religious preference, whether respondents had children under the age of 18 years, and whether respondents considered themselves to be a born-again Christian.

Graph and download economic data for Real Disposable Personal Income (DSPIC96) from Jan 1959 to Aug 2025 about disposable, personal income, personal, income, real, and USA.

For this special topic poll, opinion was solicited before and after President Bill Clinton's State of the Union speech delivered February 17, 1993. Prior to the speech, questions were posed regarding Clinton's handling of the presidency, his campaign promises, the national economy, respondents' personal financial situations, and strategies to reduce the federal budget deficit. Other items assessed the share of tax dollars being spent on defense, Social Security, and health care, issues regarding homosexuals, and Al Gore's and Hillary Clinton's influence on the President. Additional questions concerned improving health care, the likelihood that respondents would watch Clinton's State of the Union speech, whether women nominated to high office by the Clinton Administration were being held to stricter standards than men, and the hiring of illegal aliens. Respondents recontacted in the call-back survey subsequent to the President's speech were queried regarding Clinton's handling of the presidency, the economic plan outlined in his speech, and the federal budget deficit. Background information on respondents includes perception of the amount of income needed to be too rich to be considered middle class, whether the respondent had a gay or lesbian friend/family member, the importance of religion, chances of being out of work sometime in the next 12 months, military service, parental status, economic self-placement, 1992 presidential vote choice, voter registration status, political party, political orientation, religious preference, fundamentalist self-identification, education, age, race, preference for "African-American" or "Black" as a label, Hispanic origin, marital status, family income, sex, and past involvement in expressing opinions by writing to Congress, calling in to a radio or television talk show, calling or writing to a newspaper, and calling an 800 or 900 number.

eNAV for Fixed Income Funds Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Global eNAV for Fixed Income Funds market size was valued at $1.3 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $3.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 12.1% during 2024–2033. The primary driver behind this robust growth is the increasing demand for real-time, accurate, and transparent valuation of fixed income portfolios, driven by regulatory pressure and institutional investors’ need for enhanced risk management. The adoption of electronic Net Asset Value (eNAV) solutions is rapidly transforming the fixed income fund management landscape, enabling more agile decision-making and compliance in a market that is becoming increasingly complex and data-driven. As digital transformation accelerates across the asset management industry, eNAV platforms are emerging as critical infrastructure for fund administrators, custodians, and asset managers seeking to streamline operations and remain competitive.

Regional Outlook

North America commands the largest share of the global eNAV for Fixed Income Funds market, accounting for approximately 38% of total market value in 2024. This dominance is attributed to the region’s mature financial markets, high adoption rate of advanced fintech solutions, and a well-established regulatory framework that encourages transparency and innovation. Major financial centers such as New York and Toronto have become hotspots for fintech startups and established technology providers, driving the deployment of sophisticated eNAV systems across asset management firms, banks, and insurance companies. Furthermore, stringent compliance requirements by regulatory bodies like the SEC and FINRA have accelerated the integration of automated valuation and risk analytics, ensuring that North America remains at the forefront of market innovation and adoption.

Asia Pacific is the fastest-growing region in the eNAV for Fixed Income Funds market, projected to register an impressive CAGR of 15.7% between 2024 and 2033. The surge in market growth is underpinned by rapid digitalization of financial services, increasing inflow of foreign investments, and a burgeoning middle class driving demand for sophisticated investment products. Countries like China, Japan, Singapore, and Australia are witnessing significant investments in financial technology, with local and international players collaborating to offer tailored eNAV solutions. Regulatory reforms aimed at improving transparency and investor protection, particularly in China and India, are further catalyzing the adoption of eNAV platforms among asset managers and institutional investors. The region’s dynamic economic environment and ongoing capital market development are expected to fuel continued expansion and innovation in the coming years.

Emerging markets in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa are gradually embracing eNAV technology, albeit at a slower pace due to challenges such as limited technological infrastructure, skilled workforce shortages, and fragmented regulatory landscapes. However, the growing participation of global asset managers and the entry of regional fintech firms are beginning to bridge these gaps. Localized demand for transparent and standardized valuation methods is on the rise, especially among pension funds and sovereign wealth funds seeking to modernize their investment processes. Policy initiatives aimed at financial market development and cross-border investment flows are expected to create new growth opportunities, although adoption will likely remain uneven across countries due to varying levels of market maturity and regulatory readiness.

Report Scope

This poll, conducted January 11-16, 1985, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to rate Reagan's performance as president over the past four years and to describe their expectations for his performance in his second term in office. Respondents also were asked a series of questions relating to the nation's economy, their personal financial situation and expectations, and whether they trusted the Democrats or Republicans to do a better job in coping with the nation's problems. A series of questions asked about the federal budget deficit and ways to reduce it, federal income tax system and the Treasury Department's tax reform proposal. Additional subjects addressed support for nuclear power, the apartheid protests in South Africa, the New York City subway shooting, and gun ownership. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, marital status, religious preference, voter registration status and participation history, political party affiliation, political philosophy, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household income, the number of household members over the age of 18, whether respondents considered themselves to be middle or working class, and whether any member of the household was a veteran, a labor union member, or employed by the government.