In G20 countries, the share of the population that earned at least the equivalent of the highest 10 percent of global income earners as of 2022 in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms varies from over two thirds in Australia to only *** percent in Indonesia. The United States recorded the second-highest upper-class share of the G20 countries. However, looking at for instance China, approximately ** percent of the population counts as middle class or above, whereas just ***** percent counts as upper class or higher.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Property Count data was reported at 1,636.000 Unit in 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Property Count data is updated yearly, averaging 1,636.000 Unit from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Property Count data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data was reported at 10,581.803 Night th in Jun 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 10,370.615 Night th for Mar 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data is updated quarterly, averaging 10,498.577 Night th from Sep 2016 (Median) to Jun 2017, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,581.803 Night th in Jun 2017 and a record low of 10,370.615 Night th in Mar 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q017: Tourism Accommodation Statistics.
https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/
Educational campaigning has received little attention in the literature. This study investigates long-term and organised urban campaigns that are collectively lobbying the Victorian State Government in Australia, for a new public high school to be constructed in their suburb. A public high school is also known as a state school, government school, or an ordinary comprehensive school. It receives the majority of its funding from the State and Federal Australian Government, and is generally regarded as ‘free’ education, in comparison to a private school. Whilst the campaigners frame their requests as for a ‘public school’, their primary appeal is for a local school in their community. This study questions how collective campaigning for a locale-specific public school is influenced by geography, class and identity. In order to explore these campaigns, I draw on formative studies of middle-class school choice from an Australian and United Kingdom perspective (Campbell, Proctor, & Sherington, 2009; Reay, Crozier, & James, 2011). To think about the role of geography and space in these processes of choice, I look to apply Harvey’s (1973) theory of absolute, relational and relative space. I use Bourdieu (1999b) as a sociological lens that is attentive to “site effects” and it is through this lens that I think about class as a “collection of properties” (Bourdieu, 1984, p. 106), actualised via mechanisms of identity and representation (Hall, 1996; Rose, 1996a, 1996b). This study redresses three distinct gaps in the literature: first, I focus attention on a contemporary middle-class choice strategy—that is, collective campaigning for a public school. Research within this field is significantly under-developed, despite this choice strategy being on the rise. Second, previous research argues that certain middle-class choosers regard the local public school as “inferior” in some way (Reay, et al., 2011, p. 111), merely acting as a “safety net” (Campbell, et al., 2009, p. 5) and connected to the working-class chooser (Reay & Ball, 1997). The campaigners are characteristic of the middle-class school chooser, but they are purposefully and strategically seeking out the local public school. Therefore, this study looks to build on work by Reay, et al. (2011) in thinking about “against-the-grain school choice”, specifically within the Australian context. Third, this study uses visual and graphic methods in order to examine the influence of geography in the education market (Taylor, 2001). I see the visualisation of space and schooling that I offer in this dissertation as a key theoretical contribution of this study. I draw on a number of data sets, both qualitative and quantitative, to explore the research questions. I interviewed campaigners and attended campaign meetings as participant observer; I collected statistical data from fifteen different suburbs and schools, and conducted comparative analyses of each. These analyses are displayed by using visual graphs. This study uses maps created by a professional graphic designer and photographs by a professional photographer; I draw on publications by the campaigners themselves, such as surveys, reports and social media; but also, interviews with campaigners that are published in local or state newspapers. The multiple data sets enable an immersive and rich graphic ethnography. This study contributes by building on understandings of how particular sociological cohorts of choosers are engaging with, and choosing, the urban public school in Australia. It is relevant for policy making, in that it comes at a time of increasing privatisation and a move toward independent public schools. This study identifies cohorts of choosers that are employing individual and collective political strategies to obtain a specific school, and it identifies this cohort via explicit class-based characteristics and their school choice behaviours. I look to use fresh theoretical and methodological approaches that emphasise space and geography, theorising geo-identity and the pseudo-private school.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Revenue per Available Room data was reported at 122.186 AUD in 2017. Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Revenue per Available Room data is updated yearly, averaging 122.186 AUD from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Revenue per Available Room data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This interview is part of the Women, Risk and Aids Project (1989-90) archive which was created as part of the Reanimating Data Project (2018-20).Anonymised transcript of interview with Justine, who is living with her girlfriend and co-parenting their child. She talks about the gay scene in Sydney and the sexual norms that it allowed. Justine has had some patchy use of contraception throughout her sexual relationships, relying mainly on the pill, and has contracted STDs. Her sex education in Australia was quite poor, especially around things like abortion that were taught by pro-life religious groups. AIDS information came from the gay community itself, gay media and through her job in the council - she wouldn't trust the 'regular' news. It has been quite a worry for her, especially as she is socialising within gay communities. Justine came out while at school, and faced a lot of homophobia, but saw it as an opportunity to challenge restrictive social norms in her suburban community. She's not sure what she'd like to do in the future, but does not envisage staying with her current partner for a long time.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data was reported at 41,949.572 Night th in 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data is updated yearly, averaging 41,949.572 Night th from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Available data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data was reported at 1,194.270 AUD mn in Jun 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1,313.412 AUD mn for Mar 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,283.190 AUD mn from Sep 2016 (Median) to Jun 2017, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,365.011 AUD mn in Dec 2016 and a record low of 1,194.270 AUD mn in Jun 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q017: Tourism Accommodation Statistics.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Count data was reported at 116,424.000 Unit in 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Count data is updated yearly, averaging 116,424.000 Unit from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Count data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data was reported at 5,125.662 AUD mn in 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data is updated yearly, averaging 5,125.662 AUD mn from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Total Revenue data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Occupied data was reported at 7,601.693 Night th in Jun 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 7,821.009 Night th for Mar 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Occupied data is updated quarterly, averaging 7,874.391 Night th from Sep 2016 (Median) to Jun 2017, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8,102.066 Night th in Dec 2016 and a record low of 7,601.693 Night th in Jun 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Room Nights Occupied data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q017: Tourism Accommodation Statistics.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data was reported at 71.837 % in Jun 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 75.415 % for Mar 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data is updated quarterly, averaging 75.702 % from Sep 2016 (Median) to Jun 2017, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 76.693 % in Dec 2016 and a record low of 71.837 % in Jun 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q017: Tourism Accommodation Statistics.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data was reported at 74.977 % in 2017. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data is updated yearly, averaging 74.977 % from Jun 2017 (Median) to 2017, with 1 observations. Australia Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Occupancy Rate data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q018: Tourism Accommodation Statistics: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Average Daily Rate data was reported at 157.106 AUD in Jun 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 167.934 AUD for Mar 2017. Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Average Daily Rate data is updated quarterly, averaging 162.991 AUD from Sep 2016 (Median) to Jun 2017, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 168.477 AUD in Dec 2016 and a record low of 157.106 AUD in Jun 2017. Tourism Accommodation: By Class: Upscale & Upper Mid Classes with 10 or More Rooms: Average Daily Rate data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Tourism Research Australia. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.Q017: Tourism Accommodation Statistics.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
旅游住宿:按类别:有10间或10间以上客房的高档和中高档:每间可用房的收入在06-01-2017达112.861澳大利亚元,相较于03-01-2017的126.647澳大利亚元有所下降。旅游住宿:按类别:有10间或10间以上客房的高档和中高档:每间可用房的收入数据按季更新,09-01-2016至06-01-2017期间平均值为123.373澳大利亚元,共4份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2016,达129.211澳大利亚元,而历史最低值则出现于06-01-2017,为112.861澳大利亚元。CEIC提供的旅游住宿:按类别:有10间或10间以上客房的高档和中高档:每间可用房的收入数据处于定期更新的状态,数据来源于Tourism Research Australia,数据归类于全球数据库的澳大利亚 – 表 AU.Q017:旅游住宿统计。
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
In G20 countries, the share of the population that earned at least the equivalent of the highest 10 percent of global income earners as of 2022 in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms varies from over two thirds in Australia to only *** percent in Indonesia. The United States recorded the second-highest upper-class share of the G20 countries. However, looking at for instance China, approximately ** percent of the population counts as middle class or above, whereas just ***** percent counts as upper class or higher.