About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Midwest City population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Midwest City across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Midwest City was 58,086, a 0.15% increase year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Midwest City population was 57,997, a decline of 0.29% compared to a population of 58,164 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Midwest City increased by 4,319. In this period, the peak population was 58,464 in the year 2020. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Midwest City is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Midwest City population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Midwest City Population by Year. You can refer the same here

This map shows population change from 2000 to 2010 by county, tract, and block group. Magenta symbols represent losses in population while blue symbols represent gains. At the national level, the map highlights growth patterns in the west coast, Texas, and the east coast in blue, and areas that have lost population, such as Detroit, New Orleans, and much of the Midwest, in magenta. Areas of larger growth and decline are represented with larger symbols. As you zoom into the map, you activate the gauge symbols. These show the degree of population increase or decrease. The white arrow points to the level of change (blue = increase, magenta = decrease). Click on any of the symbols to view a popup showing the count of population growth or decline, the percent change, and a bar chart comparing 2000 to 2010 population.Story map and layers are found in the Living Atlas.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Midwest, WY population pyramid, which represents the Midwest population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Midwest, WY, is 5.7.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Midwest, WY, is 32.3.
• Total dependency ratio for Midwest, WY is 38.0.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Midwest, WY is 3.1.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Midwest population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Midwest for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Midwest for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Midwest for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Midwest Population by Age. You can refer the same here

The adjusted-R2 value of each model is added to the last row of the table.

Throughout much of its North American distribution, a decline in the number of Western Snowy Plover has been detected and, based on limited observations over the past 25 years, a decline of breeding pairs is suspected throughout inland breeding sites east of the Rocky Mountains. The observed population decline has been hypothesized to be the result of breeding, wintering, and migratory habitat loss. In response to a suspected decline in population size, the species has been designated by multiple state and federal agencies as a species of concern.

Nest visits were conducted throughout the species' range during the 2006 breeding season, and the success of nests, under varying conditions such as extreme temperature and precipitation, threat of predation, threat of human disturbance, and threat of flooding were analyzed using randomization, a re-sampling technique.

The authors explore their findings and offer recommendations for best management practices.

The population name, site, year, densities, macroclimates, and microclimates are included. (XLSX)

This map shows the historical housing unit change in consistent 2010 census tract boundaries from 1940 to 2019. In many cities over that time period—especially in the 1950s and 1960s—federal, state, and local governments demolished thousands of housing units as part of their "urban renewal" programs. These neighborhoods were typically in the older parts of city centers, contained lower income populations, and had higher shares of Black, Hispanic, and immigrant residents than their respective cities. Homes were typically replaced with new interstate highways and thoroughfares, stadiums, civic buildings, parking lots, high rises, rights of way, and other non-residential uses. In a fraction of cases, homes were replaced with public housing. Many of these areas show up as red on this map because they still have not regained the level of housing they had before World War II.Urban renewal is not the only reason for housing loss. Many tracts in places that have been undergoing population decline—especially cities in the North and Midwest and many rural communities—have also lost considerable amounts of housing over this time period.On the other side of things, many suburban and exurban areas—especially in the South and West—have experienced significant population and housing unit growth. These places show up as blue on this map.The data used to make this map comes from the Historical Housing Unit and Urbanization Database 2010, or HHUUD10. To read more on the methodologies used to estimate the housing unit counts, please refer to the methods paper. To download the data in tabular form, please visit the data repository. To download the feature layer used to make this map or read about the attributes, see the feature layer. Please also remember that these data are estimates and are therefore imperfect. They should be treated like all interpolated data: with caution and a healthy dose of skepticism.Citation:Markley, S.N., Holloway, S.R., Hafley, T.J., Hauer, M.E. 2022. Housing unit and urbanization estimates for the continental U.S. in consistent tract boundaries, 1940–2019. Scientific Data 9 (82). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01184-x

The population name, site, year, densities, macroclimates, and microclimates are included. (XLSX)

The state, county, years, number of sites, total transect length per survey on average, total observed numbers of individuals throughout the project lifespan, total number of surveys throughout the project lifespan, and data sources are included. Refer to Fig 1 for the mapped locations of these five populations.

The decline in the eastern North American population of the monarch butterfly population since the late 1990s has been attributed to the loss of milkweed during the summer breeding season and the consequent reduction in the size of the summer population that migrates to central Mexico to overwinter (milkweed limitation hypothesis). However, in some studies the size of the summer population was not found to decline and was not correlated with the size of the overwintering population. The authors of these studies concluded that milkweed limitation could not explain the overwintering population decline. They hypothesized that increased mortality during fall migration was responsible (migration mortality hypothesis). We used data from the long-term monarch tagging program, managed by Monarch Watch, to examine three predictions of the migration mortality hypothesis: (1) that the summer population size is not correlated with the overwintering population size, (2) that migration success is the main determinant of overwintering population size, and (3) that migration success has declined over the last two decades. As an index of the summer population size, we used the number of wild-caught migrating individuals tagged in the U.S. Midwest from 1998 to 2015. As an index of migration success we used the recovery rate of Midwest tagged individuals in Mexico. With regard to the three predictions: (1) the number of tagged individuals in the Midwest, explained 74% of the variation in the size of the overwintering population. Other measures of summer population size were also correlated with overwintering population size. Thus, there is no disconnection between late summer and winter population sizes. (2) Migration success was not significantly correlated with overwintering population size, and (3) migration success did not decrease during this period. Migration success was correlated with the level of greenness of the area in the southern U.S. used for nectar by migrating butterflies. Thus, the main determinant of yearly variation in overwintering population size is summer population size with migration success being a minor determinant. Consequently, increasing milkweed habitat, which has the potential of increasing the summer monarch population, is the conservation measure that will have the greatest impact.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Midwest. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Midwest population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Midwest, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 111 men and 82 women in the workforce. Among them, 60 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 31 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 10% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 9.68% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 3.33% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while none of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Midwest median household income by race. You can refer the same here