As of May 2024, the estimated number of nurse midwives employed in the United States ranged from ** nurse midwives to *** by state. California registered the highest number of nurse midwives, whereas South Carolina had the lowest.

This dataset reports the number of midwives per 10,000 population, based on data from the WHO National Health Workforce Accounts (NHWA) platform. It provides a standardised measure of workforce density, reflecting the availability of midwifery services in relation to population size. This indicator is essential for assessing health system capacity, identifying gaps in coverage, and informing policies aimed at equitable access to skilled midwifery care worldwide.Number of midwives (Midwifery Professionals + Midwifery Associate Professionals + Nurse-midwife professionals + Nurse-midwife associate professionals) per 10,000 population. Note: Data doesn't include nurse-midwives.Data Source: WHO national health workforce reporting systems: https://apps.who.int/nhwaportal/Data Dictionary:The data is collated with the following columns:Column headingContent of this columnPossible valuesRefNumerical counter for each row of data, for ease of identification1+CountryShort name for the country195 countries in total – all 194 WHO member states plus PalestineISO3Three-digit alphabetical codes International Standard ISO 3166-1 assigned by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). e.g. AFG (Afghanistan)ISO22 letter identifier code for the countrye.g. AF (Afghanistan)ICM_regionICM Region for countryAFR (Africa), AMR (Americas), EMR (Eastern Mediterranean), EUR (Europe), SEAR (South east Asia) or WPR (Western Pacific)CodeUnique project code for each indicator:GGTXXnnnGG=data group e.g. OU for outcomeT = N for novice or E for ExpertXX = identifier number 00 to 30nnn = identifier name eg mmre.g. OUN01sbafor Outcome Novice Indicator 01 skilled birth attendance Short_nameIndicator namee.g. maternal mortality ratioDescriptionText description of the indicator to be used on websitee.g. Maternal mortality ratio (maternal deaths per 100,000 live births)Value_typeDescribes the indicator typeNumeric: decimal numberPercentage: value between 0 & 100Text: value from list of text optionsY/N: yes or noValue_categoryExpect this to be ‘total’ for all indicators for Phase 1, but this could allow future disaggregation, e.g. male/female; urban/ruraltotalYearThe year that the indicator value was reported. For most indicators, we will only report if 2014 or more recente.g. 2020Latest_Value‘LATEST’ if this is the most recent reported value for the indicator since 2014, otherwise ‘No’. Useful for indicators with time trend data.LATEST or NOValueIndicator valuee.g. 99.8. NB Some indicators are calculated to several decimal places. We present the value to the number of decimal places that should be displayed on the Hub.SourceFor Caesarean birth rate [OUN13cbr] ONLY, this column indicates the source of the data, either OECD when reported, or UNICEF otherwise.OECD or UNICEFTargetHow does the latest value compare with Global guidelines / targets?meets targetdoes not meet targetmeets global standarddoes not meet global standardRankGlobal rank for indicator, i.e. the country with the best global score for this indicator will have rank = 1, next = 2, etc. This ranking is only appropriate for a few indicators, others will show ‘na’1-195Rank out ofThe total number of countries who have reported a value for this indicator. Ranking scores will only go as high as this number.Up to 195TrendIf historic data is available, an indication of the change over time. If there is a global target, then the trend is either getting better, static or getting worse. For mmr [OUN04mmr] and nmr [OUN05nmr] the average annual rate of reduction (arr) between 2016 and latest value is used to determine the trend:arr <-1.0 = getting worsearr >=-1.0 AND <=1.0 = staticarr >1.0 = getting betterFor other indicators, the trend is estimated by comparing the average of the last three years with the average ten years ago:decreasing if now < 95% 10 yrs agoincreasing if now > 105% 10 yrs agostatic otherwiseincreasingdecreasing Or, if there is a global target: getting better,static,getting worseNotesClarification comments, when necessary LongitudeFor use with mapping LatitudeFor use with mapping DateDate data uploaded to the Hubthe following codes are also possible values:not reported does not apply don’t knowThis is one of many datasets featured on the Midwives’ Data Hub, a digital platform designed to strengthen midwifery and advocate for better maternal and newborn health services.

In 2024, there were over ** thousand midwives in employment in the United Kingdom (UK). The number of midwives has, in general, increased since the beginning of the provided time interval, when there were around **** thousand midwives. Trends among other healthcare personnel in the UK The number of medical practitioners employed in the UK amounted to approximately *** thousand in 2024. Aside from some slight fluctuations, the number of practitioners has generally increased since 2010. The number of nurses in the UK has followed a similar pattern since 2010, with almost *** thousand in employment in 2021, an increase of nearly *** thousand since 2010. However, the number of nurses in 2021 decreased significantly.Impact of Brexit Since the UK made the decision to leave the European Union, the number of new nurses and midwives from the EEA has significantly decreased. In the year 2018/19, the number of new registrants from the EEA was less than one thousand, while almost *** thousand joined from the EEA in 2015/16, which was before the referendum concerning the EU membership.

Poor coordination of care across providers and birth settings has been associated with adverse maternal-newborn outcomes. Research suggests that integration of midwives into regional health systems is a key determinant of optimal maternal-newborn outcomes, yet, to date, the characteristics of an integrated system have not been described, nor linked to health disparities.MethodsOur multidisciplinary team examined published regulatory data to inform a 50-state database describing the environment for midwifery practice and interprofessional collaboration. Items (110) detailed differences across jurisdictions in scope of practice, autonomy, governance, and prescriptive authority; as well as restrictions that can affect patient safety, quality, and access to maternity providers across birth settings. A nationwide survey of state regulatory experts (n = 92) verified the ‘on the ground’ relevance, importance, and realities of local interpretation of these state laws. Using a modified Delphi process, we selected 50/110 key items to include in a weighted, composite Midwifery Integration Scoring (MISS) system. Higher scores indicate greater integration of midwives across all settings. We ranked states by MISS scores; and, using reliable indicators in the CDC-Vital Statistics Database, we calculated correlation coefficients between MISS scores and maternal-newborn outcomes by state, as well as state density of midwives and place of birth. We conducted hierarchical linear regression analysis to control for confounding effects of race.ResultsMISS scores ranged from lowest at 17 (North Carolina) to highest at 61 (Washington), out of 100 points. Higher MISS scores were associated with significantly higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding, and significantly lower rates of cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight infants, and neonatal death. MISS scores also correlated with density of midwives and access to care across birth settings. Significant differences in newborn outcomes accounted for by MISS scores persisted after controlling for proportion of African American births in each state.ConclusionThe MISS scoring system assesses the level of integration of midwives and evaluates regional access to high quality maternity care. In the United States, higher MISS Scores were associated with significantly higher rates of physiologic birth, less obstetric interventions, and fewer adverse neonatal outcomes.

Turkey TR: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data was reported at 2.617 Ratio in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.200 Ratio for 2014. Turkey TR: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data is updated yearly, averaging 1.786 Ratio from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2015, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.233 Ratio in 2013 and a record low of 1.396 Ratio in 1990. Turkey TR: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Turkey – Table TR.World Bank: Health Statistics. Nurses and midwives include professional nurses, professional midwives, auxiliary nurses, auxiliary midwives, enrolled nurses, enrolled midwives and other associated personnel, such as dental nurses and primary care nurses.; ; World Health Organization's Global Health Workforce Statistics, OECD, supplemented by country data.; Weighted average;

Graph and download economic data for Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Nurse midwives occupations: 16 years and over (LEU0257869400A) from 2011 to 2024 about nursing, occupation, full-time, salaries, workers, 16 years +, wages, employment, and USA.

In 2024, there was one rural health midwife for about ***** people in the Philippines. The highest midwife-to-population ratio was recorded in the National Capital Region (NCR), with about ****** people for every midwife. In contrast, there were ***** residents in the MIMAROPA region for every midwife.

Finland FI: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data was reported at 15.032 Ratio in 2014. This records an increase from the previous number of 14.809 Ratio for 2013. Finland FI: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data is updated yearly, averaging 14.809 Ratio from Dec 2002 (Median) to 2014, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23.756 Ratio in 2009 and a record low of 8.920 Ratio in 2006. Finland FI: Nurses and Midwives: per 1000 People data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank: Health Statistics. Nurses and midwives include professional nurses, professional midwives, auxiliary nurses, auxiliary midwives, enrolled nurses, enrolled midwives and other associated personnel, such as dental nurses and primary care nurses.; ; World Health Organization's Global Health Workforce Statistics, OECD, supplemented by country data.; Weighted average;

Our multidisciplinary team of legal, clinician, and perinatal epidemiology experts designed a study to assess the effects of state regulation of midwives on patient access to high quality maternity care in the US. We developed a novel, weighted scoring system that ranks all 50 states and DC on level of midwifery integration, and then linked state scores to maternal and newborn outcomes. In our study we demonstrate that greater integration of midwives is associated with significantly higher rates of physiologic birth outcomes, lower rates of obstetric interventions, and fewer adverse neonatal outcomes. Our new Midwifery Integration Scoring System provides an evidenced-informed tool that can identify barriers to effective health human resource allocation in maternity care, based on population-level health outcomes data. In the current context of the Sustainable Development Goals to facilitate equitable access to skilled maternity providers, we believe that our findings will be of great interest to your readers. We uploaded the 1) Midwifery Integration Scoring System and 2) the data set that includes all data points needed to replicate the results presented in our paper. Most of the data is for the year 2014 and comes from the CDC. Other data sources are detailed in the publication and a short data dictionary will be uploaded soon.

This is the dataset to validate three indicators related to the density and distribution of midwives and midwife performance of BEmONC functions. 1. Health worker density and distribution of midwifery professionals; Metadata Numerator: Number of health workers by cadre Denominator: Total population Disaggregator(s) Cadre: General and specialist practitioners, nursing and midwifery professionals, traditional and complementary medicine professionals; Distribution: Place of employment (urban/rural), Subnational (district) Data Source Health worker registry Indicator Reference WHO Core Health Indicators 2. Density of midwives, by district (by births) Numerator: Number of midwives in a district Denominator: All births/pregnancies in a district Disaggregator(s): None Data Source Surveys Indicator Reference WHO Consultation on Improving Measurement of Quality of MNCH in Facilities 3. Midwives are authorized to deliver basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) Metadata Midwives are authorized to perform specific tasks Indicator Definition: A national policy allows midwives to deliver the seven functions of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care. • Parenteral antibiotics • Parenteral oxytocin • Parenteral anticonvulsants • Manual removal of the placenta • Removal of retained products of conception • Assisted vaginal delivery • Newborn resuscitation Disaggregation Nurse Midwife Nurse-Midwife Medical Assistant Data Source WHO RMNCAH Policy Survey 2018 Indicator Reference Countdown to 2030 Study Aims: 1. To compare documentary evidence of authorization of midwives and midwifery professionals to perform the seven basic EmONC signal functions with the reported response on the indicator for that country. 2. To compare authorization to evidence of actual performance of each signal function by midwives and midwifery professionals in the last 90-day period in facilities where emergency maternal and newborn care is available each study setting. 3. To compare the scope of practice of midwifery professionals in each country to international reference standards. To compare estimates from two indicators that aim to measure the same construct (density and distribution of midwives and midwifery professionals), in order to explore whether they are consistent/track reliably with each other (convergent validity), whether there is evidence that one measure gives more accurate estimate or is a more efficient way to capture the construct, and finally whether adjusting these two indicators by linking the data sources and/or adjusting the numerator and/or denominator would give a better estimate of this construct.

Comprehensive dataset containing 11,703 verified Midwife businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

Browse the different maps showcased in the "Midwives in Leadership" map, namely: National Healthcare Systems Support of Midwife-led Continuity of Care and Where the Midwife Leaders Are.Data focused on the midwives in leadership globally was collected for the 2021 State of the World's Midwifery Report by the International Confederation of Midwives, with support by Direct Relief, and can be accessed and downloaded in the Open Data Portal of the Global Midwives' Hub. Data collected on the state of midwifery leadership throughout the world for the 2021 State of the World's Midwifery Report. The data was collected via a survey that was sent to midwives' associations, who filled it out for their country and shared it with their Ministry of Health for validation. Data was collected by the International Confederation of Midwives with the support of UNFPA, WHO, and Direct Relief. This data visualization is just one of the many data products on the Global Midwives Hub, a digital resource with open data, maps, and mapping applications (among other things), to support advocacy for improved maternal and newborn services.

This dataset identifies whether midwives hold leadership roles within a country's national or federal Ministry of Health. It reflects the inclusion of midwifery expertise in national health policy and decision-making structures, offering insight into professional recognition, influence, and the integration of midwives in health system governance. Data Source:State of the World"s Midwifery (SoWMy) global and regional reports: https://internationalmidwives.org/resources/state-of-the-worlds-midwifery-2021/The State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) series of reports, led by ICM, UNFPA, and WHO, provides country-level data on the midwifery workforce, including national midwives" associations, education, leadership, and regulation. It highlights gaps and opportunities to strengthen midwife-led care and improve maternal and newborn health outcomes. Data were collected by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) in collaboration with Novametrics through a global midwifery regulatory survey.Data Dictionary: The data is collated with the following columns:Column headingContent of this columnPossible valuesRefNumerical counter for each row of data, for ease of identification1+CountryShort name for the country195 countries in total – all 194 WHO member states plus PalestineISO3Three-digit alphabetical codes International Standard ISO 3166-1 assigned by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). e.g. AFG (Afghanistan)ISO22 letter identifier code for the countrye.g. AF (Afghanistan)ICM_regionICM Region for countryAFR (Africa), AMR (Americas), EMR (Eastern Mediterranean), EUR (Europe), SEAR (South east Asia) or WPR (Western Pacific)CodeUnique project code for each indicator:GGTXXnnnGG=data group e.g. OU for outcomeT = N for novice or E for ExpertXX = identifier number 00 to 30nnn = identifier name eg mmre.g. OUN01sbafor Outcome Novice Indicator 01 skilled birth attendance Short_nameIndicator namee.g. maternal mortality ratioDescriptionText description of the indicator to be used on websitee.g. Maternal mortality ratio (maternal deaths per 100,000 live births)Value_typeDescribes the indicator typeNumeric: decimal numberPercentage: value between 0 & 100Text: value from list of text optionsY/N: yes or noValue_categoryExpect this to be ‘total’ for all indicators for Phase 1, but this could allow future disaggregation, e.g. male/female; urban/ruraltotalYearThe year that the indicator value was reported. For most indicators, we will only report if 2014 or more recente.g. 2020Latest_Value‘LATEST’ if this is the most recent reported value for the indicator since 2014, otherwise ‘No’. Useful for indicators with time trend data.LATEST or NOValueIndicator valuee.g. 99.8. NB Some indicators are calculated to several decimal places. We present the value to the number of decimal places that should be displayed on the Hub.SourceFor Caesarean birth rate [OUN13cbr] ONLY, this column indicates the source of the data, either OECD when reported, or UNICEF otherwise.OECD or UNICEFTargetHow does the latest value compare with Global guidelines / targets?meets targetdoes not meet targetmeets global standarddoes not meet global standardRankGlobal rank for indicator, i.e. the country with the best global score for this indicator will have rank = 1, next = 2, etc. This ranking is only appropriate for a few indicators, others will show ‘na’1-195Rank out ofThe total number of countries who have reported a value for this indicator. Ranking scores will only go as high as this number.Up to 195TrendIf historic data is available, an indication of the change over time. If there is a global target, then the trend is either getting better, static or getting worse. For mmr [OUN04mmr] and nmr [OUN05nmr] the average annual rate of reduction (arr) between 2016 and latest value is used to determine the trend:arr <-1.0 = getting worsearr >=-1.0 AND <=1.0 = staticarr >1.0 = getting betterFor other indicators, the trend is estimated by comparing the average of the last three years with the average ten years ago:decreasing if now < 95% 10 yrs agoincreasing if now > 105% 10 yrs agostatic otherwiseincreasingdecreasing Or, if there is a global target: getting better,static,getting worseNotesClarification comments, when necessary LongitudeFor use with mapping LatitudeFor use with mapping DateDate data uploaded to the Hub the following codes are also possible values: not reported does not apply don’t know This is one of many datasets featured on the Midwives’ Data Hub, a digital platform designed to strengthen midwifery and advocate for better maternal and newborn health services.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Midwife Center for Birth and Womens Health

This dataset identifies whether countries report one or more midwives in leadership roles within regulatory authorities for midwifery. Leadership representation reflects midwives' involvement in governance and policy shaping. This indicator highlights progress towards midwife-led regulation and inclusive decision-making in national health systems. Data Source:State of the World"s Midwifery (SoWMy) global and regional reports: https://internationalmidwives.org/resources/state-of-the-worlds-midwifery-2021/The State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) series of reports, led by ICM, UNFPA, and WHO, provides country-level data on the midwifery workforce, including national midwives" associations, education, leadership, and regulation. It highlights gaps and opportunities to strengthen midwife-led care and improve maternal and newborn health outcomes. Data were collected by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) in collaboration with Novametrics through a global midwifery regulatory survey.Data Dictionary: The data is collated with the following columns:Column headingContent of this columnPossible valuesRefNumerical counter for each row of data, for ease of identification1+CountryShort name for the country195 countries in total – all 194 WHO member states plus PalestineISO3Three-digit alphabetical codes International Standard ISO 3166-1 assigned by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). e.g. AFG (Afghanistan)ISO22 letter identifier code for the countrye.g. AF (Afghanistan)ICM_regionICM Region for countryAFR (Africa), AMR (Americas), EMR (Eastern Mediterranean), EUR (Europe), SEAR (South east Asia) or WPR (Western Pacific)CodeUnique project code for each indicator:GGTXXnnnGG=data group e.g. OU for outcomeT = N for novice or E for ExpertXX = identifier number 00 to 30nnn = identifier name eg mmre.g. OUN01sbafor Outcome Novice Indicator 01 skilled birth attendance Short_nameIndicator namee.g. maternal mortality ratioDescriptionText description of the indicator to be used on websitee.g. Maternal mortality ratio (maternal deaths per 100,000 live births)Value_typeDescribes the indicator typeNumeric: decimal numberPercentage: value between 0 & 100Text: value from list of text optionsY/N: yes or noValue_categoryExpect this to be ‘total’ for all indicators for Phase 1, but this could allow future disaggregation, e.g. male/female; urban/ruraltotalYearThe year that the indicator value was reported. For most indicators, we will only report if 2014 or more recente.g. 2020Latest_Value‘LATEST’ if this is the most recent reported value for the indicator since 2014, otherwise ‘No’. Useful for indicators with time trend data.LATEST or NOValueIndicator valuee.g. 99.8. NB Some indicators are calculated to several decimal places. We present the value to the number of decimal places that should be displayed on the Hub.SourceFor Caesarean birth rate [OUN13cbr] ONLY, this column indicates the source of the data, either OECD when reported, or UNICEF otherwise.OECD or UNICEFTargetHow does the latest value compare with Global guidelines / targets?meets targetdoes not meet targetmeets global standarddoes not meet global standardRankGlobal rank for indicator, i.e. the country with the best global score for this indicator will have rank = 1, next = 2, etc. This ranking is only appropriate for a few indicators, others will show ‘na’1-195Rank out ofThe total number of countries who have reported a value for this indicator. Ranking scores will only go as high as this number.Up to 195TrendIf historic data is available, an indication of the change over time. If there is a global target, then the trend is either getting better, static or getting worse. For mmr [OUN04mmr] and nmr [OUN05nmr] the average annual rate of reduction (arr) between 2016 and latest value is used to determine the trend:arr <-1.0 = getting worsearr >=-1.0 AND <=1.0 = staticarr >1.0 = getting betterFor other indicators, the trend is estimated by comparing the average of the last three years with the average ten years ago:decreasing if now < 95% 10 yrs agoincreasing if now > 105% 10 yrs agostatic otherwiseincreasingdecreasing Or, if there is a global target: getting better,static,getting worseNotesClarification comments, when necessary LongitudeFor use with mapping LatitudeFor use with mapping DateDate data uploaded to the Hub the following codes are also possible values: not reported does not apply don’t know This is one of many datasets featured on the Midwives’ Data Hub, a digital platform designed to strengthen midwifery and advocate for better maternal and newborn health services.

Data collected on the state of midwifery regulation around the world for the 2021 State of the World's Midwifery Report. The data was collected via a survey that was sent to midwives' associations, who filled it out for their country and shared it with their Ministry of Health for validation. Data was collected by the International Confederation of Midwives with the support of UNFPA, WHO, and Direct Relief. This data set is just one of the many datasets on the Global Midwives Hub, a digital resource with open data, maps, and mapping applications (among other things), to support advocacy for improved maternal and newborn services.

This dataset presents the total number of midwives reported by each country through WHO national health workforce reporting systems. Accurate workforce data is essential for planning, regulation, and investment in maternal and newborn health. Tracking the number of midwives helps identify gaps in coverage, guide workforce scaling, and assess alignment with global targets for midwifery density. This indicator supports efforts to build strong, adequately resourced midwifery services in every health system.Data Source: WHO national health workforce reporting systems: https://apps.who.int/nhwaportal/Data Dictionary: The data is collated with the following columns:Column headingContent of this columnPossible valuesRefNumerical counter for each row of data, for ease of identification1+CountryShort name for the country195 countries in total – all 194 WHO member states plus PalestineISO3Three-digit alphabetical codes International Standard ISO 3166-1 assigned by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). e.g. AFG (Afghanistan)ISO22 letter identifier code for the countrye.g. AF (Afghanistan)ICM_regionICM Region for countryAFR (Africa), AMR (Americas), EMR (Eastern Mediterranean), EUR (Europe), SEAR (South east Asia) or WPR (Western Pacific)CodeUnique project code for each indicator:GGTXXnnnGG=data group e.g. OU for outcomeT = N for novice or E for ExpertXX = identifier number 00 to 30nnn = identifier name eg mmre.g. OUN01sbafor Outcome Novice Indicator 01 skilled birth attendance Short_nameIndicator namee.g. maternal mortality ratioDescriptionText description of the indicator to be used on websitee.g. Maternal mortality ratio (maternal deaths per 100,000 live births)Value_typeDescribes the indicator typeNumeric: decimal numberPercentage: value between 0 & 100Text: value from list of text optionsY/N: yes or noValue_categoryExpect this to be ‘total’ for all indicators for Phase 1, but this could allow future disaggregation, e.g. male/female; urban/ruraltotalYearThe year that the indicator value was reported. For most indicators, we will only report if 2014 or more recente.g. 2020Latest_Value‘LATEST’ if this is the most recent reported value for the indicator since 2014, otherwise ‘No’. Useful for indicators with time trend data.LATEST or NOValueIndicator valuee.g. 99.8. NB Some indicators are calculated to several decimal places. We present the value to the number of decimal places that should be displayed on the Hub.SourceFor Caesarean birth rate [OUN13cbr] ONLY, this column indicates the source of the data, either OECD when reported, or UNICEF otherwise.OECD or UNICEFTargetHow does the latest value compare with Global guidelines / targets?meets targetdoes not meet targetmeets global standarddoes not meet global standardRankGlobal rank for indicator, i.e. the country with the best global score for this indicator will have rank = 1, next = 2, etc. This ranking is only appropriate for a few indicators, others will show ‘na’1-195Rank out ofThe total number of countries who have reported a value for this indicator. Ranking scores will only go as high as this number.Up to 195TrendIf historic data is available, an indication of the change over time. If there is a global target, then the trend is either getting better, static or getting worse. For mmr [OUN04mmr] and nmr [OUN05nmr] the average annual rate of reduction (arr) between 2016 and latest value is used to determine the trend:arr <-1.0 = getting worsearr >=-1.0 AND <=1.0 = staticarr >1.0 = getting betterFor other indicators, the trend is estimated by comparing the average of the last three years with the average ten years ago:decreasing if now < 95% 10 yrs agoincreasing if now > 105% 10 yrs agostatic otherwiseincreasingdecreasing Or, if there is a global target: getting better,static,getting worseNotesClarification comments, when necessary LongitudeFor use with mapping LatitudeFor use with mapping DateDate data uploaded to the Hubthe following codes are also possible values:not reported does not apply don’t knowThis is one of many datasets featured on the Midwives’ Data Hub, a digital platform designed to strengthen midwifery and advocate for better maternal and newborn health services.

The Washington State Department of Health presents this information as a service to the public. True and correct copies of legal disciplinary actions taken after July 1998 are available on our Provider Credential Search site. These records are considered certified by the Department of Health.

This includes information on health care providers.

Please contact our Customer Service Center at 360-236-4700 for information about actions before July 1998. The information on this site comes directly from our database and is updated daily at 10:00 a.m.. This data is a primary source for verification of credentials and is extracted from the primary database at 2:00 a.m. daily.

News releases about disciplinary actions taken against Washington State healthcare providers, agencies or facilities are on the agency's Newsroom webpage.

Disclaimer The absence of information in the Provider Credential Search system doesn't imply any recommendation, endorsement or guarantee of competence of any healthcare professional. The presence of information in this system doesn't imply a provider isn't competent or qualified to practice. The reader is encouraged to carefully evaluate any information found in this data set.

Comprehensive dataset containing 40 verified Midwife businesses in MQ with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

There were 32.4 thousand midwives practicing in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2021, the largest number in Europe, followed by Poland. This statistic displays the number of midwives practicing in Europe in 2021, by country.