Facebook
TwitterThis is an annual publication which provides figures on Ministry of Defence land holdings, by parent service, country, type of use and whether owned, leased or with legal rights. This edition provides statistics for 2009 to 2015, with a base year of 2000, and updates figures released in the 2014 edition of this publication, which provided statistics up to 2014.
The background quality report for the MOD land holdings is also provided here.The purpose of a background quality report is to inform users of the statistics about the quality of the data used to produce the publication and any statistics derived from that data.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains UK data from the Defense Infrastructure Organization Disposals Database House of Commons Report 2017, about the properties of UK Ministry of Defense(MOD) which are currently for sale. Along with properties identification and description data, a deadline (represented as financial year) and a specific ID is presented for all properties.
Facebook
TwitterBAE was the greatest supplier to the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence (MOD). In 2019/20, **** percent of its annual expenditure went to the UK based company. BAE provides security systems for the air, maritime, land and cyber sectors and is employer to nearly ****** people worldwide. In 2020, the defense company had an order backlog worth **** billion British pounds.
Dependency of leading suppliers
In 2019/20, roughly ** percent of BAE System’s global revenue was made through purchases by the MOD. This figure has stayed relatively constant since 2005/06, with only minor increases in dependency recorded between 2005 and 2007 and in 2014/15 when the MOD’s revenue share grew to nearly ** percent. QinetiQ Group was the supplier most reliant on business with the MOD.
From Land to Sea
Between 2017 and 2027, the MOD is expected to spend ** billion British pounds on submarine purchases. This was the greatest single investment made for any equipment going to the Armed Forces.
Facebook
TwitterThis geospatial dataset contains the authoritative boundaries of Department of Defense sites, commonly referred to as installations, ranges, training areas, bases, forts, camps, armories, centers, etc. These installations are, in many cases, comprised of a number of subordinate sites. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those reported in the 2015 Base Structure Report (BSR) were considered for inclusion. Points are placed either at or near the center of each site and do not reflect any particular landmark. Boundaries encompass federally owned or otherwise managed lands, as defined in the BSR. The point and boundary location datasets are intended for planning purposes only, and do not represent the legal or surveyed land parcel boundaries.
Facebook
TwitterThis publication provides annual statistics at 1 April each year on the UK armed forces vessels, land equipment and aircraft, and military formations.
These statistics were revised in December 2022 to correct the number of Ajax platforms currently held by the Ministry of Defence.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Firing notice for Tregantle.
For comprehensive information on firing times for Tregantle please go to the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tregantle-firing-notice
Facebook
TwitterThe U.S. Defense Department oversees the USA"s armed forces and manages over 30 million acres of land. With over 2.8 million service members and civilian employees the department is the world"s largest employer.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: Lands managed by the U.S. Department of DefenseGeographic Extent: United States, Guam, Puerto RicoData Coordinate System: WGS 1984Visible Scale: The data is visible at all scalesSource: DOD Military Installations Ranges and Training Areas layer. Publication Date: May 2025This layer is a view of the USA Federal Lands layer. A filter has been used on this layer to eliminate non-Department of Defense lands. For more information on layers for other agencies see the USA Federal Lands layer.What can you do with this layer?This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis across the ArcGIS system. This layer can be combined with your data and other layers from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro to create powerful web maps that can be used alone or in a story map or other application.Because this layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World it is easy to add to your map:In ArcGIS Online you can add this layer to a map by selecting Add then Browse Living Atlas Layers. A window will open. Type "department of defense" in the search box and browse to the layer. Select the layer then click Add to Map.In ArcGIS Pro open a map and select Add Data from the Map Tab. Select Data at the top of the drop down menu. The Add Data dialog box will open on the left side of the box expand Portal if necessary then select Living Atlas. Type "department of defense" in the search box, browse to the layer then click OK.In both ArcGIS Online and Pro you can change the layer's symbology and view its attribute table. You can filter the layer to show subsets of the data using the filter button in Online or a definition query in Pro.The data can be exported to a file geodatabase, a shape file or other format and downloaded using the Export Data button on the top right of this webpage.This layer can be used as an analytic input in both Online and Pro through the Perform Analysis window Online or as an input to a geoprocessing tool, model, or Python script in Pro.The ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World provides an easy way to explore many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics like this one.Questions?Please leave a comment below if you have a question about this layer, and we will get back to you as soon as possible.
Facebook
TwitterThis publication provides annual statistics at 1 April each year on the UK armed forces vessels, land equipment and aircraft, and military formations.
This publication contains provisional data on Army land platforms.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset, released by DoD, contains geographic information for major installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and its territories. This release integrates site information about DoD installations, training ranges, and land assets in a format which can be immediately put to work in commercial geospatial information systems. Homeland Security/Homeland Defense, law enforcement, and readiness planners will benefit from immediate access to DoD site location data during emergencies. Land use planning and renewable energy planning will also benefit from use of this data. Users are advised that the point and boundary location datasets are intended for planning purposes only, and do not represent the legal or surveyed land parcel boundaries.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
The GCC Defence Market size was valued at USD 35.00 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 59.23 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 6.8% from 2025 to 2032.
Key Market Drivers:
Rising Geopolitical Tensions: The GCC defence market is driven by geopolitical instability and regional security concerns, with Saudi Arabia's defence expenditure growing by 6% YoY due to increased regional conflicts and tensions. The region's strategic position necessitates investment in advanced defence systems to protect national borders and maintain regional stability. As military threats evolve, demand for sophisticated defence equipment like missile defence systems and naval platforms continues to rise.
Modernization of Armed Forces: The modernization of armed forces in GCC nations is driving the defence market, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE investing in advanced technologies like UAVs, cyber defence systems, and next-generation fighter aircraft. The UAE Ministry of Defence (2023) has allocated a portion of its defence budget to upgrade air and missile defence capabilities, making it one of the most technologically advanced military forces in the region.
Facebook
TwitterThis data set depicts federal lands having restrictions on access or activities -- that is, lands mangaed by the National Park Service, Defense Department, or Energy Department -- in western North America. The data set was created by reformatting and merging state- and province-based ownership data layers originally acquired from diverse sources (including state GAP programs, USBLM state offices and other sources). For each original dataset 3 additional fields, "Pub_Pvt", "CA_OWN", and "SOURCE" were added and populated based on the specific ownership information contained in the source data. The original coverages were then merged based on the "CA_OWN" field. Finally, NPS, DOD, and DOE lands were selected out of the ownership layer. All work was completed in AcMap 8.3. This product and all source data are available online from SAGEMAP: http://sagemap.wr.usgs.gov.
Facebook
TwitterThe Department of Defense (DOD) layer has been creaetd by this query: ADMIN_DEPT_CODE='DOD' AND ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE IN ('DOD','USAF','ARMY','USACE','USMC', 'NAVY', Null)
Facebook
TwitterThe Military Bases dataset was last updated on November 11, 2025 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2024 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD. While every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000. If a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529039
Facebook
TwitterThe dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2009 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
APAC Intelligence Surveillance And Reconnaissance Market size was valued at USD 3.66 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 5.3 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 4.74% from 2026 to 2032.
Key Market Drivers:
Rising Defense Spending and Modernization: Japan's Ministry of Defense reported a defense budget of ¥6.8 trillion in 2024, with 20% committed to ISR capabilities. Similarly, the Australian Department of Defence has announced a $270 billion investment in defense capabilities through 2030, with a strong emphasis on modern ISR equipment and marine surveillance.
Border Security Concerns: According to India's Ministry of Defence, border surveillance infrastructure spending would increase by 45% in 2023 to $3.2 billion. South Korea's Defense Ministry has allotted $2.8 billion exclusively for ISR capabilities to improve maritime and land border monitoring, a 32% increase over the previous year.
Facebook
TwitterY503 series of 1:: 250 000 scale topographic maps. Each map is a compilation from pre-existing published topographic maps mosty at 1: 50 000 scale (detailed on each map face). Series includes Kaabong, Aloi, jinja, in Uganda which was compiled and published by The Department of Lands and Surveys in Uganda. These maps use the New Arc (1960) datus Clarke 1880 (Modified) Spheroid UTM zone 36. Series also includes Musuma in Tanzania which was compiled by the Ministry of Lands, Forests and Wildlife, Tanganyika. Arusha was compiled by the Ministry of Lands, Settlement and Water Development Tanzania. Lushoto was compiled by the Ministry of Lands Surveys and Water Tanganyika. Series also include Kapenguria, Nyeri, Chuka, Chismaio, published by War office and Air Ministry using Transverse Mercator, Clarke 1880 (UTM Zones 36 and 37). Garsen was published by the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom). CRS System: Various: Transverse Mercator, Clarke 1880; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880); Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 36S; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 36N; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 37S; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 37N, Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 38N
Facebook
TwitterThis annual Official Statistic is providing summary statistics on land transport accident deaths whilst in service in the 5 year period 2009-2013 among the UK regular armed forces. This report is published in March each year reporting on the previous calendar year.
Facebook
TwitterY503 series of 1:: 250 000 scale topographic maps. Each map is a compilation from pre-existing published topographic maps mosty at 1: 50 000 scale (detailed on each map face). Series includes Kaabong, Aloi, jinja, in Uganda which was compiled and published by The Department of Lands and Surveys in Uganda. These maps use the New Arc (1960) datus Clarke 1880 (Modified) Spheroid UTM zone 36. Series also includes Musuma in Tanzania which was compiled by the Ministry of Lands, Forests and Wildlife, Tanganyika. Arusha was compiled by the Ministry of Lands, Settlement and Water Development Tanzania. Lushoto was compiled by the Ministry of Lands Surveys and Water Tanganyika. Series also include Kapenguria, Nyeri, Chuka, Chismaio, published by War office and Air Ministry using Transverse Mercator, Clarke 1880 (UTM Zones 36 and 37). Garsen was published by the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom). CRS System: Various: Transverse Mercator, Clarke 1880; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880); Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 36S; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 36N; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 37S; Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 37N, Arc 1960 (Clarke 1880) Zone 38N
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
The dataset depicts the authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories (NTAD). These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2010 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.
Facebook
TwitterGOSTAplus (Atlas 8) and the Blended Land Surface and SST Atlas were taked from the GOSTAplus CDROM received at NCAR February 1998. The period of record for these grids is 1851-1995.
The sea and land surface temperature portions of this data collection, which span 1856 to 1995, have in general been superseded by continued developments of HadISST (DS277.3) , and "http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds215.0/"> Jones' Monthly Global Surface Temperature (DS215.0) .
Facebook
TwitterThis is an annual publication which provides figures on Ministry of Defence land holdings, by parent service, country, type of use and whether owned, leased or with legal rights. This edition provides statistics for 2009 to 2015, with a base year of 2000, and updates figures released in the 2014 edition of this publication, which provided statistics up to 2014.
The background quality report for the MOD land holdings is also provided here.The purpose of a background quality report is to inform users of the statistics about the quality of the data used to produce the publication and any statistics derived from that data.