Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missing data is an inevitable aspect of every empirical research. Researchers developed several techniques to handle missing data to avoid information loss and biases. Over the past 50 years, these methods have become more and more efficient and also more complex. Building on previous review studies, this paper aims to analyze what kind of missing data handling methods are used among various scientific disciplines. For the analysis, we used nearly 50.000 scientific articles that were published between 1999 and 2016. JSTOR provided the data in text format. Furthermore, we utilized a text-mining approach to extract the necessary information from our corpus. Our results show that the usage of advanced missing data handling methods such as Multiple Imputation or Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation is steadily growing in the examination period. Additionally, simpler methods, like listwise and pairwise deletion, are still in widespread use.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This document provides a clear and practical guide to understanding missing data mechanisms, including Missing Completely At Random (MCAR), Missing At Random (MAR), and Missing Not At Random (MNAR). Through real-world scenarios and examples, it explains how different types of missingness impact data analysis and decision-making. It also outlines common strategies for handling missing data, including deletion techniques and imputation methods such as mean imputation, regression, and stochastic modeling.Designed for researchers, analysts, and students working with real-world datasets, this guide helps ensure statistical validity, reduce bias, and improve the overall quality of analysis in fields like public health, behavioral science, social research, and machine learning.
Facebook
TwitterResults of the ML models were obtained by deleting missing values from the dataset.
Facebook
TwitterThis is my first-ever project on datasets; it was a task assigned to me by my machine learning tutor. I only imputed and removed missing values depending on the context.
Notes: Down: ffill (logical order)
Time,TimeSecs,SideofField : FFill
Playtimediff: Median (has skews)
yrdln,yrdline100,: Mean
GoalToGo,FirstDown: Mode
postteam,DefensiveTeam : assign "None" to NA because it's logical for it to be NA.
Desc: FFill
ExPointResult,TwoPointConv,DefTwoPoint,PuntResult: Assign another name "None" to every NA
Passer,Passer_ID : Remove all rows that has either passer or passer_id missing, but not both, then change other rows that has both to NA to "None"
PassOutcome,PassLength: Remove all rows that has either passoutcome or passlength missing, then, change NA to "None" as the missing is logical.
PassLength: setting all NA to None
Interceptor: assign "None" to NA.
PassLocation: assign "None" to NA.
RunLocation,RunGap: use mode for both when RushAttempt.notna() = True, otherwise set to None.
ReturnResult,Returner,BlockingPlayer,FieldGoalResult,FieldGoalDistance,RecFumbTeam,RecFumbPlayer,ChalReplayResult,PenalizedTeam,PenaltyType,PenalizedPlayer,Timeout_Team : Dropping these columns entirely as they have 90%+ missing values.
Tackler1,Tackler2: assign "None" to NA.
DefTeamScore,PosTeamScore,ScoreDiff,AbsScoreDiff: FFill (before and after values are consistently the same unless new match)
No_Score_Prob,Opp_Field_Goal_Prob,Opp_Safety_Prob,Opp_Touchdown_Prob,Field_Goal_Prob,Safety_Prob,Touchdown_Prob,EPA,Win_Prob: assign "0.0" to missing values
Away_WP_post,Away_WP_pre,Home_WP_post,Away_WP_post,WPA,airWPA,yacWPA: Mean
*"None" values are chosen instead of deletion due to the missing value being conditional and not a data gathering error. They are then to be encoded
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Facebook
TwitterThe dataset is created by imputing the missing values of ICR - Identifying Age Related Conditions competition dataset. In this dataset depending on feature selection some subversions are also created. - Version 1 : The version is created by dropping all the rows with missing values. - Version 2 : The version is created by 'BQ' and 'EL' columns which consist most of the missing values. To remove the remaining missing values rows with missing values are deleted. - Version 3 : The version is created by imputing mean values by column average. Median is considered as measure of average. - Version 4 : The version is created by imputing missing values of 'BQ' and 'EL' by linear regression models and remaining missing values are imputed by average value of the column where missing value is present. 'AB', 'AF', 'AH', 'AM', 'CD', 'CF', 'DN', 'FL' and 'GL' are used to calculate the missing values of 'BQ'. 'CU', 'GE' and 'GL' are used to calculate missing values of 'EL'. Models are found in the version4/imputer. Two subversions are created by extraction only important features of the dataset. - Version 5 : The version is created by imputing missing values using KNNImputer. Two subversions are created by extracting only important features. For the categorical feature 'EJ', 'A' is encoded as 0 and 'B' is encoded as '1'. For more details how the transformations of the dataset is done visit this notebook.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dataset for the paper "Identifying missing data handling methods with text mining".
It contains the type of missing data handling method used by a given paper.
id: ID of the article
origin: Source journal
pub_year: Publication year
discipline: Discipline category of the article based on origin
about_missing: Is the article about missing data handling? (0 - no, 1 - yes)
imputation: Was some kind of imputation technique used in the article? (0 - no, 1 - yes)
advanced: Was some kind of advanced imputation technique used in the article? (0 - no, 1 - yes)
deletion: Was some kind of deletion technique used in the article? (0 - no, 1 - yes)
text_tokens: Snipped out parts from the original articles
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
R scripts used for Monte Carlo simulations and data analyses.
Facebook
TwitterCervical cancer is a leading cause of women’s mortality, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective treatment. In line with the imperative of early intervention, the automated identification of cervical cancer has emerged as a promising avenue, leveraging machine learning techniques to enhance both the speed and accuracy of diagnosis. However, an inherent challenge in the development of these automated systems is the presence of missing values in the datasets commonly used for cervical cancer detection. Missing data can significantly impact the performance of machine learning models, potentially leading to inaccurate or unreliable results. This study addresses a critical challenge in automated cervical cancer identification—handling missing data in datasets. The study present a novel approach that combines three machine learning models into a stacked ensemble voting classifier, complemented by the use of a KNN Imputer to manage missing values. The proposed model achieves remarkable results with an accuracy of 0.9941, precision of 0.98, recall of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.97. This study examines three distinct scenarios: one involving the deletion of missing values, another utilizing KNN imputation, and a third employing PCA for imputing missing values. This research has significant implications for the medical field, offering medical experts a powerful tool for more accurate cervical cancer therapy and enhancing the overall effectiveness of testing procedures. By addressing missing data challenges and achieving high accuracy, this work represents a valuable contribution to cervical cancer detection, ultimately aiming to reduce the impact of this disease on women’s health and healthcare systems.
Facebook
TwitterThe folder contains three datasets: Zomato restaurants, Restaurants on Yellow Pages, and Arabic poetry. Where all datasets have been taken from Kaggle and made some modifications by adding missing values, where the missing values are referred to as symbol (?). The experiment has been done to experiment with the processes of imputation missing values on nominal values. The missing values in the three datasets are in the range of 10%-80%.
The Arabic dataset has several modifications as follows: 1. Delete the columns that contain English values such as Id, poem_link, poet link. The reason is the need to evaluate the ERAR method on the Arabic data set. 2. Add diacritical marks to some records to check the effect of diacritical marks during frequent itemset generation. note: the results of the experiment on the Arabic dataset will be find in the paper under the title "Missing values imputation in Arabic datasets using enhanced robust association rules"
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of women’s mortality, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective treatment. In line with the imperative of early intervention, the automated identification of cervical cancer has emerged as a promising avenue, leveraging machine learning techniques to enhance both the speed and accuracy of diagnosis. However, an inherent challenge in the development of these automated systems is the presence of missing values in the datasets commonly used for cervical cancer detection. Missing data can significantly impact the performance of machine learning models, potentially leading to inaccurate or unreliable results. This study addresses a critical challenge in automated cervical cancer identification—handling missing data in datasets. The study present a novel approach that combines three machine learning models into a stacked ensemble voting classifier, complemented by the use of a KNN Imputer to manage missing values. The proposed model achieves remarkable results with an accuracy of 0.9941, precision of 0.98, recall of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.97. This study examines three distinct scenarios: one involving the deletion of missing values, another utilizing KNN imputation, and a third employing PCA for imputing missing values. This research has significant implications for the medical field, offering medical experts a powerful tool for more accurate cervical cancer therapy and enhancing the overall effectiveness of testing procedures. By addressing missing data challenges and achieving high accuracy, this work represents a valuable contribution to cervical cancer detection, ultimately aiming to reduce the impact of this disease on women’s health and healthcare systems.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of women’s mortality, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective treatment. In line with the imperative of early intervention, the automated identification of cervical cancer has emerged as a promising avenue, leveraging machine learning techniques to enhance both the speed and accuracy of diagnosis. However, an inherent challenge in the development of these automated systems is the presence of missing values in the datasets commonly used for cervical cancer detection. Missing data can significantly impact the performance of machine learning models, potentially leading to inaccurate or unreliable results. This study addresses a critical challenge in automated cervical cancer identification—handling missing data in datasets. The study present a novel approach that combines three machine learning models into a stacked ensemble voting classifier, complemented by the use of a KNN Imputer to manage missing values. The proposed model achieves remarkable results with an accuracy of 0.9941, precision of 0.98, recall of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.97. This study examines three distinct scenarios: one involving the deletion of missing values, another utilizing KNN imputation, and a third employing PCA for imputing missing values. This research has significant implications for the medical field, offering medical experts a powerful tool for more accurate cervical cancer therapy and enhancing the overall effectiveness of testing procedures. By addressing missing data challenges and achieving high accuracy, this work represents a valuable contribution to cervical cancer detection, ultimately aiming to reduce the impact of this disease on women’s health and healthcare systems.
Facebook
TwitterAbstract: Given the methodological sophistication of the debate over the “political resource curse”—the purported negative relationship between natural resource wealth (in particular oil wealth) and democracy—it is surprising that scholars have not paid more attention to the basic statistical issue of how to deal with missing data. This article highlights the problems caused by the most common strategy for analyzing missing data in the political resource curse literature—listwise deletion—and investigates how addressing such problems through the best-practice technique of multiple imputation affects empirical results. I find that multiple imputation causes the results of a number of influential recent studies to converge on a key common finding: A political resource curse does exist, but only since the widespread nationalization of petroleum industries in the 1970s. This striking finding suggests that much of the controversy over the political resource curse has been caused by a neglect of missing-data issues.
Facebook
TwitterIris dataset is taken from Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/uciml/iris. Deleted some random values to create the CSV file
Facebook
TwitterThe integration of proteomic datasets, generated by non-cooperating laboratories using different LC-MS/MS setups can overcome limitations in statistically underpowered sample cohorts but has not been demonstrated to this day. In proteomics, differences in sample preservation and preparation strategies, chromatography and mass spectrometry approaches and the used quantification strategy distort protein abundance distributions in integrated datasets. The Removal of these technical batch effects requires setup-specific normalization and strategies that can deal with missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR) type values at a time. Algorithms for batch effect removal, such as the ComBat-algorithm, commonly used for other omics types, disregard proteins with MNAR missing values and reduce the informational yield and the effect size for combined datasets significantly. Here, we present a strategy for data harmonization across different tissue preservation techniques, LC-MS/MS instrumentation setups and quantification approaches. To enable batch effect removal without the need for data reduction or error-prone imputation we developed an extension to the ComBat algorithm, ´ComBat HarmonizR, that performs data harmonization with appropriate handling of MAR and MNAR missing values by matrix dissection The ComBat HarmonizR based strategy enables the combined analysis of independently generated proteomic datasets for the first time. Furthermore, we found ComBat HarmonizR to be superior for removing batch effects between different Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-plexes, compared to commonly used internal reference scaling (iRS). Due to the matrix dissection approach without the need of data imputation, the HarmonizR algorithm can be applied to any type of -omics data while assuring minimal data loss
Facebook
TwitterPercentage of first entries into foster care for children under age 18, by removal reason (e.g., 8.5% of children entering foster care for the first time in California in 2011-2013 were removed from their families due to physical abuse). First entries into foster care are unduplicated counts of children under the supervision of county welfare departments and exclude cases under the supervision of county probation departments, out-of-state agencies, state adoptions district offices, and Indian child welfare departments. Counts are based on the first out-of-home placement of eight days or more, even if it was not the first actual placement. 'Other' includes removals due to exploitation, child’s disability or handicap, and other reasons. LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 80 total children with first entries. N/A means that data are not available. The sum of all reasons for removal percentages may not add up to 100% due to missing values. Data Source: Needell, B., et al. (May 2014). Child Welfare Services Reports for California, U.C. Berkeley Center for Social Services Research. Retrieved on May 31, 2015.
Facebook
TwitterCRAVE Confirmatory Factor Analysis w/ summed PW move and rest, and RN move and rest scores. CLEANED.(Study 2).All erroneous values and 999's (previously coded for missing values) have been deleted, leaving the value blank.PCM12/02/2020 Paul C. McKee
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
A Raster having 20 m resolution with decimal values was assembled from 18.6 billion bathymetric soundings that were obtained from the National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) https://www.ncei.noaa.gov. Bathymetric soundings extends from Kuril-Kamchatka Trench in the Bearing Sea along the Aleutian Trench to the Gulf of Alaska, and in the Arctic Ocean from Prince Patrick Island to the International Date Line. Bathymetric soundings were scrutinized for accuracy using statistical analysis and visual inspection with some imputation. Editing processes included: deleting erroneous and superseded values, digitizing missing values, and referencing all data sets to a common, modern datum.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset is built on data from Overbuff with the help of python and selenium. Development environment - Jupyter Notebook.
The tables contain the data for competitive seasons 1-4 and for quick play for each hero and rank along with the standard statistics (common to each hero as well as information belonging to a specific hero).
Note: data for some columns are missing on Overbuff site (there is '—' instead of a specific value), so they were dropped: Scoped Crits for Ashe and Widowmaker, Rip Tire Kills for Junkrat, Minefield Kills for Wrecking Ball. 'Self Healing' column for Bastion was dropped too as Bastion doesn't have this property anymore in OW2. Also, there are no values for "Javelin Spin Kills / 10min" for Orisa in season 1 (the column was dropped). Overall, all missing values were cleaned.
Attention: Overbuff doesn't contain info about OW 1 competitive seasons (when you change a skill tier, the data isn't changed). If you know a site where it's possible to get this data, please, leave a comment. Thank you!
The code on GitHub .
All procedure is done in 5 stages:
Data is retrieved directly from HTML elements on the page with the selenium tool on python.
After scraping, data was cleansed: 1) Deleted comma separator on thousands (e.g. 1,009 => 1009). 2) Translated time representation (e.g. '01:23') to seconds (1*60 + 23 => 83). 3) Lúcio has become Lucio, Torbjörn - Torbjorn.
Data were arranged into a table and saved to CSV.
Columns which are supposed to have only numeric values are checked. All non-numeric values are dropped. This stage helps to find missing values which contain '—' instead and delete them.
Additional missing values are searched for and dealt with. It's either column rename that happens (as the program cannot infer the correct column name for missing values) or a column drop. This stage ensures all wrong data are truly fixed.
The procedure to fetch the data takes 7 minutes on average.
This project and code were born from this GitHub code.
Facebook
TwitterThere are no missing values. Please see Readme.txt file for more details about variables.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missing data is an inevitable aspect of every empirical research. Researchers developed several techniques to handle missing data to avoid information loss and biases. Over the past 50 years, these methods have become more and more efficient and also more complex. Building on previous review studies, this paper aims to analyze what kind of missing data handling methods are used among various scientific disciplines. For the analysis, we used nearly 50.000 scientific articles that were published between 1999 and 2016. JSTOR provided the data in text format. Furthermore, we utilized a text-mining approach to extract the necessary information from our corpus. Our results show that the usage of advanced missing data handling methods such as Multiple Imputation or Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation is steadily growing in the examination period. Additionally, simpler methods, like listwise and pairwise deletion, are still in widespread use.