United States Population: Mississippi data was reported at 2,984,100.000 Person in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2,985,415.000 Person for 2016. United States Population: Mississippi data is updated yearly, averaging 2,946,104.000 Person from Jun 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,988,578.000 Person in 2014 and a record low of 2,848,310.000 Person in 2000. United States Population: Mississippi data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G003: Population By State.

The FY2016 State Summaries provide an overview of benefits, services, demographics and population of Veterans analyzed by state.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 16 cities in the Mississippi County, AR by Black or African American population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each cities over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Black Population: This column displays the rank of cities in the Mississippi County, AR by their Black or African American population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• cities: The cities for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Black Population: The Black population of the cities is shown in this column.
• % of Total cities Population: This shows what percentage of the total cities population identifies as Black. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Mississippi County Black Population: This tells us how much of the entire Mississippi County, AR Black population lives in that cities. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2010 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2010 Census, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2000 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area, no land area.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 82 counties in the Mississippi by Non-Hispanic White population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Non-Hispanic White Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Mississippi by their Non-Hispanic White population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Non-Hispanic White Population: The Non-Hispanic White population of the counties is shown in this column.
• % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Non-Hispanic White. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Mississippi Non-Hispanic White Population: This tells us how much of the entire Mississippi Non-Hispanic White population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Mississippi has taken part in 49 U.S. presidential elections since 1820, and has voted for the overall winning candidate on 25 occasions, giving a success rate of 51 percent (which is one of the lowest in the country). Mississippi did not take part in the 1864 election, due to its secession during the American Civil War, and although the war had ended in 1865, Mississippi was not readmitted to the union until 1870 and did not take part in the 1868 election either. Generally speaking, Mississippi's electoral votes have been won by the most conservative option of the major party candidates. The Magnolia State voted for the Democratic nominee in 28 out of the 31 elections held between 1828 ad 1956, before switching to the Republican Party during the civil rights era, and it has voted for the Republican nominee in every election since 1980. In the 2020 election, Donald Trump the popular vote with a comfortable 58 percent share of the popular vote; similar to his 2016 performance.

Exceptions Although Mississippi has generally voted for the most conservative major party candidate throughout its history, there were a number of occasions where the results did not follow this trend. For example, Ulysses S. Grant won Mississippi's popular vote in 1872, as many white voters had become disenfranchised in the wake of the civil war, while this was the first opportunity for most of Mississippi's black population to take part in a presidential election. In 1948 and 1968 respectively, Mississippi voted for third party candidates, who both ran on anti-black, pro-segregation platforms, which were popular in the south. In the 1960 election, Mississippi's electors were not pledged to any candidate; as John F. Kennedy's attitude to civil rights was unpopular during the Jim Crow era, Mississippi's electors protested by casting their votes for Harry Flood Byrd, although this did not influence the nationwide result. The last time where Mississippi voted Democrat was in 1976, where the southerner Jimmy Carter defeated Gerald R. Ford, who was unpopular in the south following his pardon of Richard Nixon.

Mississippi's population Unlike most other states in the south, Mississippi's population has grown relatively slowly compared to the national average. Because of this, Mississippi's allocation of electoral votes has fallen from ten in the 1920s, to just six today. Mississippi's status as a safe, red state may seem somewhat surprising, given the fact that almost forty percent of Mississippi's population is made up of black Americans, who overwhelmingly vote Democrat; Republican dominance in Mississippi has been attributed to the party's considerable popularity among white voters, as well as the organization of district lines and strict voting laws. As of the 2020 election, no U.S. president was born in or resided in Mississippi when taking office, nor has any other major party nominee.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) for the tabulation and dissemination of decennial census Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) data, American Community Survey (ACS) PUMS data, and ACS period estimates. Nesting within states, or equivalent entities, PUMAs cover the entirety of the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. PUMA delineations are subject to population, building block geography, geographic nesting, and contiguity criteria. Each PUMA is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeros and a descriptive name.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 298 cities in the Mississippi by Hispanic White population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each cities over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Hispanic White Population: This column displays the rank of cities in the Mississippi by their Hispanic White population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• cities: The cities for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Hispanic White Population: The Hispanic White population of the cities is shown in this column.
• % of Total cities Population: This shows what percentage of the total cities population identifies as Hispanic White. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Mississippi Hispanic White Population: This tells us how much of the entire Mississippi Hispanic White population lives in that cities. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

United States Household Income: Mississippi data was reported at 43,441.000 USD in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 41,099.000 USD for 2016. United States Household Income: Mississippi data is updated yearly, averaging 31,610.000 USD from Mar 1984 (Median) to 2017, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 43,441.000 USD in 2017 and a record low of 15,430.000 USD in 1984. United States Household Income: Mississippi data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.H048: Household Income: by State.

Graph and download economic data for Estimated Mean Real Household Wages Adjusted by Cost of Living for Lee County, MS (MWACL28081) from 2016 to 2023 about Lee County, MS; MS; adjusted; average; wages; real; and USA.

This dataset tracks annual two or more races student percentage from 2016 to 2023 for Jefferson Davis County School District vs. Mississippi

This dataset tracks annual black student percentage from 2016 to 2023 for Hazlehurst Elementary School vs. Mississippi and Hazlehurst City School District

Graph and download economic data for State Tax Collections: T51 Documentary and Stock Transfer Taxes for Mississippi (QTAXT51QTAXCAT3MSNO) from Q1 1994 to Q3 2016 about transfers, collection, stocks, MS, tax, and USA.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Range / Feature Name Relationship File (ADDRFN.dbf) contains a record for each address range / linear feature name relationship. The purpose of this relationship file is to identify all street names associated with each address range. An edge can have several feature names; an address range located on an edge can be associated with one or any combination of the available feature names (an address range can be linked to multiple feature names). The address range is identified by the address range identifier (ARID) attribute that can be used to link to the Address Ranges Relationship File (ADDR.dbf). The linear feature name is identified by the linear feature identifier (LINEARID) attribute that can be used to link to the Feature Names Relationship File (FEATNAMES.dbf).

This dataset tracks annual hispanic student percentage from 2016 to 2023 for Hazlehurst Elementary School vs. Mississippi and Hazlehurst City School District

Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, Asian Alone (5-year estimate) in Mississippi County, AR was 168.00000 Persons in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, Asian Alone (5-year estimate) in Mississippi County, AR reached a record high of 264.00000 in January of 2010 and a record low of 91.00000 in January of 2016. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, Asian Alone (5-year estimate) in Mississippi County, AR - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on October of 2025.

Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Walthall County, MS was 248.00000 Persons in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Walthall County, MS reached a record high of 330.00000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 77.00000 in January of 2016. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Walthall County, MS - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.

United States Mississippi: Expenditure: Direct data was reported at 29,929,967.000 USD th in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 28,990,546.000 USD th for 2015. United States Mississippi: Expenditure: Direct data is updated yearly, averaging 5,577,957.500 USD th from Jun 1957 (Median) to 2016, with 58 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 29,929,967.000 USD th in 2016 and a record low of 357,055.000 USD th in 1957. United States Mississippi: Expenditure: Direct data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.F033: Revenue & Expenditure: State and Local Government: Mississippi.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Feature Shapefile (ADDRFEAT.dbf) contains the geospatial edge geometry and attributes of all unsuppressed address ranges for a county or county equivalent area. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. Single-address address ranges have been suppressed to maintain the confidentiality of the addresses they describe. Multiple coincident address range feature edge records are represented in the shapefile if more than one left or right address ranges are associated to the edge. The ADDRFEAT shapefile contains a record for each address range to street name combination. Address range associated to more than one street name are also represented by multiple coincident address range feature edge records. Note that the ADDRFEAT shapefile includes all unsuppressed address ranges compared to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) which only includes the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge. The TIGER/Line shapefile contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

The 2016 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files.

The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county.

After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes.

The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities.

The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.