App Download Key StatisticsApp and Game DownloadsiOS App and Game DownloadsGoogle Play App and Game DownloadsGame DownloadsiOS Game DownloadsGoogle Play Game DownloadsApp DownloadsiOS App...

Unlock the power of user feedback with our iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, a comprehensive collection of reviews from thousands of apps across various categories. This robust App Store dataset includes essential details such as app names, ratings, user comments, timestamps, and more, offering valuable insights into user experiences and preferences.

Perfect for app developers, marketers, and data analysts, this dataset allows you to conduct sentiment analysis, monitor app performance, and identify trends in user behavior. By leveraging the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, you can refine app features, optimize marketing strategies, and elevate user satisfaction.

Whether you’re tracking mobile app trends, analyzing specific app categories, or developing data-driven strategies, this App Store dataset is an indispensable tool. Download the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset today or contact us for custom datasets tailored to your unique project requirements.

Ready to take your app insights to the next level? Get the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset now or explore our custom data solutions to meet your needs.

App download rankings, usage metrics, and user engagement data (iOS/Android)

This dataset encompasses a wide-ranging collection of Google Play applications, providing a holistic view of the diverse ecosystem within the platform. It includes information on various attributes such as the title, developer, monetization features, images, app descriptions, data safety measures, user ratings, number of reviews, star rating distributions, user feedback, recent updates, related applications by the same developer, content ratings, estimated downloads, and timestamps. By aggregating this data, the dataset offers researchers, developers, and analysts an extensive resource to explore and analyze trends, patterns, and dynamics within the Google Play Store. Researchers can utilize this dataset to conduct comprehensive studies on user behavior, market trends, and the impact of various factors on app success. Developers can leverage the insights derived from this dataset to inform their app development strategies, improve user engagement, and optimize monetization techniques. Analysts can employ the dataset to identify emerging trends, assess the performance of different categories of applications, and gain valuable insights into consumer preferences. Overall, this dataset serves as a valuable tool for understanding the broader landscape of the Google Play Store and unlocking actionable insights for various stakeholders in the mobile app industry.

The name and download numbers of government mobile apps.

This dataset comprises 10,000 user reviews of the BCA Mobile app collected from the Google Play Store between December 24, 2023, and June 12, 2024. Each review includes the user's name, the rating they provided (ranging from 1 to 5 stars), the timestamp of when the review was created, and the text content of the review. The dataset is in Indonesian and focuses on feedback from users in Indonesia. This data can be used to perform sentiment analysis, understand user experiences, identify common issues, and assess the overall performance of the BCA Mobile app during the specified timeframe. The reviews are sorted based on the newest first, providing the latest feedback at the top.

This is the dataset used for paper: "A Recommender System of Buggy App Checkers for App Store Moderators", published on the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft) in 2015.

Dataset Collection We built a dataset that consists of a random sample of Android app metadata and user reviews available on the Google Play Store on January and March 2014. Since the Google Play Store is continuously evolving (adding, removing and/or updating apps), we updated the dataset twice. The dataset D1 contains available apps in the Google Play Store in January 2014. Then, we created a new snapshot (D2) of the Google Play Store in March 2014.

The apps belong to the 27 different categories defined by Google (at the time of writing the paper), and the 4 predefined subcategories (free, paid, new_free, and new_paid). For each category-subcategory pair (e.g. tools-free, tools-paid, sports-new_free, etc.), we collected a maximum of 500 samples, resulting in a median number of 1.978 apps per category.

For each app, we retrieved the following metadata: name, package, creator, version code, version name, number of downloads, size, upload date, star rating, star counting, and the set of permission requests.

In addition, for each app, we collected up to a maximum of the latest 500 reviews posted by users in the Google Play Store. For each review, we retrieved its metadata: title, description, device, and version of the app. None of these fields were mandatory, thus several reviews lack some of these details. From all the reviews attached to an app, we only considered the reviews associated with the latest version of the app —i.e., we discarded unversioned and old-versioned reviews. Thus, resulting in a corpus of 1,402,717 reviews (2014 Jan.).

Dataset Stats Some stats about the datasets:

• D1 (Jan. 2014) contains 38,781 apps requesting 7,826 different permissions, and 1,402,717 user reviews.

• D2 (Mar. 2014) contains 46,644 apps and 9,319 different permission requests, and 1,361,319 user reviews.

Additional stats about the datasets are available here.

Dataset Description To store the dataset, we created a graph database with Neo4j. This dataset therefore consists of a graph describing the apps as nodes and edges. We chose a graph database because the graph visualization helps to identify connections among data (e.g., clusters of apps sharing similar sets of permission requests).

In particular, our dataset graph contains six types of nodes: - APP nodes containing metadata of each app, - PERMISSION nodes describing permission types, - CATEGORY nodes describing app categories, - SUBCATEGORY nodes describing app subcategories, - USER_REVIEW nodes storing user reviews. - TOPIC topics mined from user reviews (using LDA).

Furthermore, there are five types of relationships between APP nodes and each of the remaining nodes:

• USES_PERMISSION relationships between APP and PERMISSION nodes
• HAS_REVIEW between APP and USER_REVIEW nodes
• HAS_TOPIC between USER_REVIEW and TOPIC nodes
• BELONGS_TO_CATEGORY between APP and CATEGORY nodes
• BELONGS_TO_SUBCATEGORY between APP and SUBCATEGORY nodes

Dataset Files Info

Neo4j 2.0 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_2_0.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_2_0.rar We provide two Neo4j databases containing the 2 snapshots of the Google Play Store (January and March 2014). These are the original databases created for the paper. The databases were created with Neo4j 2.0. In particular with the tool version 'Neo4j 2.0.0-M06 Community Edition' (latest version available at the time of implementing the paper in 2014).

Neo4j 3.5 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar Currently, the version Neo4j 2.0 is deprecated and it is not available for download in the official Neo4j Download Center. We have migrated the original databases (Neo4j 2.0) to Neo4j 3.5.28. The databases can be opened with the tool version: 'Neo4j Community Edition 3.5.28'. The tool can be downloaded from the official Neo4j Donwload page.

  In order to open the databases with more recent versions of Neo4j, the databases must be first migrated to the corresponding version. Instructions about the migration process can be found in the Neo4j Migration Guide.

  First time the Neo4j database is connected, it could request credentials. The username and pasword are: neo4j/neo4j

In June 2025, ChatGPT and TikTok were the most downloaded mobile apps worldwide, with 50 million and 37 million downloads, respectively. The Meta-powered apps Instagram and Facebook followed, generating 36 million and 30 million downloads during the analyzed period. Other mobile apps such as WhatsApp, CapCut, and Temu also ranked highly.

The amount of Android apps available for download is constantly increasing, exerting a continuous pressure on developers to publish outstanding apps. Google Play (GP) is the default distribution channel for Android apps, which provides mobile app users with metrics to identify and report apps quality such as rating, amount of downloads, previous users comments, etc. In addition to those metrics, GP presents a set of top charts that highlight the outstanding apps in different categories. Both metrics and top app charts help developers to identify whether their development decisions are well valued by the community. Therefore, app presence in these top charts is a valuable information when understanding the features of top-apps. In this paper we present Hall-of-Apps, a dataset containing top charts' apps metadata extracted (weekly) from GP, for 4 different countries, during 30 weeks. The data is presented as (i) raw HTML files, (ii) a MongoDB database with all the information contained in app's HTML files (e.g., app description, category, general rating, etc.), and (iii) data visualizations built with the D3.js framework. A first characterization of the data along with the urls to retrieve it can be found in our online appendix: https://thesoftwaredesignlab.github.io/hall-of-apps-tools/

MIRAGE-2019 is a human-generated dataset for mobile traffic analysis, designed to advance the state-of-the-art in mobile app traffic analysis. It includes traffic generated by over 280 experimenters using 40 mobile apps across 3 devices.

Download MIRAGE-2019: Get the latest downloadable release here.

APP LIST: Details on the apps included in the dataset are available in the downloadable version.

Creative Commons License: MIRAGE-2019 is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Cite MIRAGE-2019: If you use MIRAGE-2019 in scientific papers, academic lectures, project reports, or technical documents, please cite:

Giuseppe Aceto, Domenico Ciuonzo, Antonio Montieri, Valerio Persico and Antonio Pescapè, "MIRAGE: Mobile-app Traffic Capture and Ground-truth Creation", 4th IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communications and Security (ICCCS 2019), October 2019, Rome (Italy).

Transit is a mobile app packed with features that helps you plan a trip on Loudoun County Transit buses. Real time bus tracking and information, service alerts and trip planners are some of the many useful features that make this app the favorite for transportation services.

Ziel dieser Studie war es, den Einfluss verschiedener Anreizsysteme auf die Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der passiven mobilen Datenerfassung unter deutschen Smartphone-Besitzern experimentell zu messen. Die Daten stammen aus einer Webumfrage unter deutschen Smartphone-Nutzern ab 18 Jahren, die aus einem deutschen, nicht wahrscheinlichen Online-Panel rekrutiert wurden. Im Dezember 2017 beantworteten 1.214 Teilnehmer einen Fragebogen zu den Themen Smartphone-Nutzung und -Fähigkeiten, Datenschutz und Sicherheit, allgemeine Einstellungen gegenüber der Umfrageforschung und Forschungseinrichtungen. Darüber hinaus enthielt der Fragebogen ein Experiment zur Bereitschaft, an der mobilen Datenerhebung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen teilzunehmen. Themen: Besitz von Smartphone, Handy, Desktop- oder Laptop-Computer, Tablet-Computer und/oder E-Book-Reader; Art des Smartphones; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der mobilen Datenerfassung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen; Wahrscheinlichkeit des Herunterladens der App zur Teilnahme an dieser Forschungsstudie; Befragter möchte lieber an der Studie teilnehmen, wenn er 100 Euro erhalten könnte; Gesamtbetrag, den der Befragte für die Teilnahme an der Studie verdienen müsste (offene Antwort); Grund, warum der Befragte nicht an der Forschungsstudie teilnehmen würde; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der Studie für einen Anreiz von insgesamt 60 Euro; Bereitschaft zur Aktivierung verschiedener Funktionen beim Herunterladen der App (Interaktionshistorie, Smartphone-Nutzung, Merkmale des sozialen Netzwerks, Netzqualitäts- und Standortinformationen, Aktivitätsdaten); vorherige Einladung zum Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Häufigkeit der Nutzung des Smartphones; Smartphone-Aktivitäten (Browsen, E-Mails, Fotografieren, Anzeigen/Post-Social-Media-Inhalte, Einkaufen, Online-Banking, Installieren von Apps, Verwenden von GPS-fähigen Apps, Verbinden über Bluethooth, Spielen, Streaming von Musik/Videos); Selbsteinschätzung der Kompetenz im Umgang mit dem Smartphone; Einstellung zu Umfragen und Teilnahme an Forschungsstudien (persönliches Interesse, Zeitverlust, Verkaufsgespräch, interessante Erfahrung, nützlich); Vertrauen in Institutionen zum Datenschutz (Marktforschungsunternehmen, Universitätsforscher, Regierungsbehörden wie das Statistische Bundesamt, Mobilfunkanbieter, App-Unternehmen, Kreditkartenunternehmen, Online-Händler und Social-Media-Plattformen); allgemeine Datenschutzbedenken; Gefühl der Datenschutzverletzung durch Banken und Kreditkartenunternehmen, Steuerbehörden, Regierungsbehörden, Marktforschung, soziale Netzwerke, Apps und Internetbrowser; Bedenken zur Datensicherheit bei Smartphone-Aktivitäten für Forschungszwecke (Online-Umfrage, Umfrage-Apps, Forschungs-Apps, SMS-Umfrage, Kamera, Aktivitätsdaten, GPS-Ortung, Bluetooth). Demographie: Geschlecht, Alter; Bundesland; höchster Schulabschluss; höchstes berufliches Bildungsniveau. Zusätzlich verkodet wurden: laufende Nummer; Dauer (Reaktionszeit in Sekunden); Gerätetyp, mit dem der Fragebogen ausgefüllt wurde. The goal of this study was to experimentally measure the influence of different incentive schemes on the willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection among German smartphone owners. The data come from a web survey among German smartphone users 18 years and older who were recruited from a German nonprobability online panel. In December 2017, 1,214 respondents completed a questionnaire on smartphone use and skills, privacy and security concerns, general attitudes towards survey research and research institutions. In addition, the questionnaire included an experiment on the willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions. Topics: Ownership of smartphone, cell phone, desktop or laptop computer, tablet computer, and/or e-book reader; type of smartphone; willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions; likelihood of downloading the app to particiapte in this research study; respondent would rather participate in the study if he could receive 100 euros; total amount to be earned for the respondent ot participate in the study (open answer); reason why the respondent wouldn´t participate in the research study; willlingness to participate in the study for an incentive of 60 euros in total; willingness to activate different functions when downloading the app (interaction history, smartphone usage, charateristics of the social network, network quality and location information, activity data); previous invitation for research app download; research app download; frequency of smartphone use; smartphone activities (browsing, e-mails, taking pictures, view/ post social media content, shopping, online banking, installing apps, using GPS-enabled apps, connecting via Bluethooth, playing games, stream music/ videos); self-assessment of smartphone skills; attitude towards surveys and participaton at research studies (personal interest, waste of time, sales pitch, interesting experience, useful); trust in institutions regarding data privacy (market research companies, university researchers, government authorities such as the Federal Statistical Office, mobile service provider, app companies, credit card companies, online retailer, and social media platforms); general privacy concern; feeling of privacy violation by banks and credit card companies, tax authorities, government agencies, market research, social networks, apps, and internet browsers; concern regarding data security with smartphone activities for research purposes (online survey, survey apps, research apps, SMS survey, camera, activity data, GPS location, Bluetooth). Demography: sex, age; federal state; highest level of school education; highest level of vocational education. Additionally coded was: running number; duration (response time in seconds); device type used to fill out the questionnaire.

Files in this dataset represent an investigation into use of the Library mobile app Minrva during the months of May 2015 through December 2015. During this time interval 45,975 API hits were recorded by the Minrva web server. The dataset included herein is an analysis of the following: 1) a delineation of API hits to mobile app modules use in the Minrva app by month, 2) a general analysis of Minrva app downloads to module use, and 3) the annotated data file providing associations from API hits to specific modules used, organized by month (May 2015 – December 2015).

Data on the “City in Time” project regarding the designated locations to experience the historical scenes, the official website and the hyperlinks to download the related mobile apps

Dataset consisting of feature vectors of 215 attributes extracted from 15,036 applications (5,560 malware apps from Drebin project and 9,476 benign apps). The dataset has been used to develop and evaluate multilevel classifier fusion approach for Android malware detection, published in the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics paper 'DroidFusion: A Novel Multilevel Classifier Fusion Approach for Android Malware Detection'. The supporting file contains further description of the feature vectors/attributes obtained via static code analysis of the Android apps.

Open Data Companion (ODC) is a productivity tool which provides a unified access point to over 120 open data portals and thousands of datasets from around the world; right from your mobile device. Crafted with mobile-optimised features and design, this is an easy and convenient way to find, access and share open data. Open Data Companion provides a framework for all State, Regional, National and Worldwide CKAN open data portals to deliver open data to all mobile users.

To access datasets from openAfrica Data Portal, type "Africa" during portal set up.

Download it: https://t.co/PtzKmfPlHJ

Contains roughly 1200 datasets from the VA Open Data catalog, as made available through the data.json. Excludes datasets that have no public downloads. Also includes a _failures.csv for download links that lead to 404 errors, for posterity. About Open Data (from site): Open data is VA data that is freely available to the public. It is a by-product of the work the VA does for Veterans, and is not personal data (names, addresses, birthplace, etc…). The idea of open data is that public data should be easily accessible and usable by anyone to create products like web or mobile apps, infographics, or stories - the sky is really the limit. For years, government data has made it possible for innovators and entrepreneurs to create products of value for the American people (if you have ever used a GPS you have benefited from one of these products). We want to keep this tradition going. Packed with experimental SciOp CLI Pack command.

Occurrences of Animalia Chordata Aves recorded by users of the Birda mobile app (https://birda.org). Species data use the IOC taxonomy (https://www.worldbirdnames.org/new/). Data imported into Birda from external sources (e.g. other birding apps) are excluded from this dataset to avoid the potential duplication of records that may have been previously published to the GBIF by another organisation. Occurrences deemed unreliable or suspicious are excluded from the dataset (see the section on quality control for further details).

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.Understanding Society, (UK Household Longitudinal Study), which began in 2009, is conducted by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex and the survey research organisations Kantar Public and NatCen. It builds on and incorporates, the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), which began in 1991. The Wellbeing app study was conducted in 2020 as part of the annual Innovation Panel (IP) Wave 13 interview. All adult respondents who had completed at least one previous IP interview were invited to download an app onto their smartphone or tablet. They were asked to use the app every evening for 14 days to report on their emotional state and self-regulation, external stressors, attachment, and interactions with loved ones. Participants were incentivised throughout the fieldwork period, with incentives being paid at the end of their two-week participation period. Of the 2,152 respondents who were invited to the app study, 967 completed the daily app questionnaire at least once. The Wellbeing app data were collected between 14 July and 26 November 2020. The protocols for the mobile app data collection included three experiments: i) varying the value of incentives for completing the study, ii) varying the length of the daily questionnaire, and iii) varying the placement of the invitation to the app study within the annual IP interview. The data deposited for the Wellbeing App Study include the survey and paradata collected with the app. The data can be linked to data on the same individuals from previous and future waves of the annual IP interviews (SN 6849) using the personal identifier, pidp. The Wellbeing app was developed and implemented by Connect Internet Solutions Ltd. For more information about the main IP study, see SN 6849. Suitable data analysis software These data are provided by the depositor in Stata format. Users are strongly advised to analyse them in Stata. Transfer to other formats may result in unforeseen issues. Main Topics: The Wellbeing app study contains data collected every evening for 14 days on emotional state and self-regulation, external stressors, attachment, and interactions with loved ones. Sub-sample of the IP study, which uses multi-stage sampling. See the User Guide for details. Multi-stage stratified random sample Questionnaire implemented in a mobile application

This dataset contains de-identified responses from 303 survey participants on their preferences for features for a mobile health app for people living with atrial fibrillation. QUT Research Data Respository Dataset Resource available for download