We surveyed 10,208 people from more than 15 countries on their mobile app usage behavior. The countries include USA, China, Japan, Germany, France, Brazil, UK, Italy, Russia, India, Canada, Spain, Australia, Mexico, and South Korea. We asked respondents about: (1) their mobile app user behavior in terms of mobile app usage, including the app stores they use, what triggers them to look for apps, why they download apps, why they abandon apps, and the types of apps they download. (2) their demographics including gender, age, marital status, nationality, country of residence, first language, ethnicity, education level, occupation, and household income (3) their personality using the Big-Five personality traits This dataset contains the results of the survey.

This dataset has been artificially generated to mimic real-world user interactions within a mobile application. It contains 100,000 rows of data, each row of which represents a single event or action performed by a synthetic user. The dataset was designed to capture many of the attributes commonly tracked by app analytics platforms, such as device details, network information, user demographics, session data, and event-level interactions.

Key Features Included

User & Session Metadata

User ID: A unique integer identifier for each synthetic user. Session ID: Randomly generated session identifiers (e.g., S-123456), capturing the concept of user sessions. IP Address: Fake IP addresses generated via Faker to simulate different network origins. Timestamp: Randomized timestamps (within the last 30 days) indicating when each interaction occurred. Session Duration: An approximate measure (in seconds) of how long a user remained active. Device & Technical Details

Device OS & OS Version: Simulated operating systems (Android/iOS) with plausible version numbers. Device Model: Common phone models (e.g., “Samsung Galaxy S22,” “iPhone 14 Pro,” etc.). Screen Resolution: Typical screen resolutions found in smartphones (e.g., “1080x1920”). Network Type: Indicates whether the user was on Wi-Fi, 5G, 4G, or 3G. Location & Locale

Location Country & City: Random global locations generated using Faker. App Language: Represents the user’s app language setting (e.g., “en,” “es,” “fr,” etc.). User Properties

Battery Level: The phone’s battery level as a percentage (0–100). Memory Usage (MB): Approximate memory consumption at the time of the event. Subscription Status: Boolean flag indicating if the user is subscribed to a premium service. User Age: Random integer ranging from teenagers to seniors (13–80). Phone Number: Fake phone numbers generated via Faker. Push Enabled: Boolean flag indicating if the user has push notifications turned on. Event-Level Interactions

Event Type: The action taken by the user (e.g., “click,” “view,” “scroll,” “like,” “share,” etc.). Event Target: The UI element or screen component interacted with (e.g., “home_page_banner,” “search_bar,” “notification_popup”). Event Value: A numeric field indicating additional context for the event (e.g., intensity, count, rating). App Version: Simulated version identifier for the mobile application (e.g., “4.2.8”). Data Quality & “Noise” To better approximate real-world data, 1% of all fields have been intentionally “corrupted” or altered:

Typos and Misspellings: Random single-character edits, e.g., “Andro1d” instead of “Android.” Missing Values: Some cells might be blank (None) to reflect dropped or unrecorded data. Random String Injections: Occasional random alphanumeric strings inserted where they don’t belong. These intentional discrepancies can help data scientists practice data cleaning, outlier detection, and data wrangling techniques.

Usage & Applications

Data Cleaning & Preprocessing: Ideal for practicing how to handle missing values, inconsistent data, and noise in a realistic scenario. Analytics & Visualization: Demonstrate user interaction funnels, session durations, usage by device/OS, etc. Machine Learning & Modeling: Suitable for building classification or clustering models (e.g., user segmentation, event classification). Simulation for Feature Engineering: Experiment with deriving new features (e.g., session frequency, average battery drain, etc.).

Important Notes & Disclaimer

Synthetic Data: All entries (users, device info, IPs, phone numbers, etc.) are artificially generated and do not correspond to real individuals. Privacy & Compliance: Since no real personal data is present, there are no direct privacy concerns. However, always handle synthetic data ethically.

Context

Data-driven models help mobile app designers understand best practices and trends, and can be used to make predictions about design performance and support the creation of adaptive UIs. This paper presents Rico, the largest repository of mobile app designs to date, created to support five classes of data-driven applications: design search, UI layout generation, UI code generation, user interaction modeling, and user perception prediction. To create Rico, we built a system that combines crowdsourcing and automation to scalably mine design and interaction data from Android apps at runtime. The Rico dataset contains design data from more than 9.3k Android apps spanning 27 categories. It exposes visual, textual, structural, and interactive design properties of more than 66k unique UI screens. To demonstrate the kinds of applications that Rico enables, we present results from training an autoencoder for UI layout similarity, which supports query-by-example search over UIs.

Content

Rico was built by mining Android apps at runtime via human-powered and programmatic exploration. Like its predecessor ERICA, Rico’s app mining infrastructure requires no access to — or modification of — an app’s source code. Apps are downloaded from the Google Play Store and served to crowd workers through a web interface. When crowd workers use an app, the system records a user interaction trace that captures the UIs visited and the interactions performed on them. Then, an automated agent replays the trace to warm up a new copy of the app and continues the exploration programmatically, leveraging a content-agnostic similarity heuristic to efficiently discover new UI states. By combining crowdsourcing and automation, Rico can achieve higher coverage over an app’s UI states than either crawling strategy alone. In total, 13 workers recruited on UpWork spent 2,450 hours using apps on the platform over five months, producing 10,811 user interaction traces. After collecting a user trace for an app, we ran the automated crawler on the app for one hour.

Acknowledgements

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN https://interactionmining.org/rico

Inspiration

The Rico dataset is large enough to support deep learning applications. We trained an autoencoder to learn an embedding for UI layouts, and used it to annotate each UI with a 64-dimensional vector representation encoding visual layout. This vector representation can be used to compute structurally — and often semantically — similar UIs, supporting example-based search over the dataset. To create training inputs for the autoencoder that embed layout information, we constructed a new image for each UI capturing the bounding box regions of all leaf elements in its view hierarchy, differentiating between text and non-text elements. Rico’s view hierarchies obviate the need for noisy image processing or OCR techniques to create these inputs.

User Feedback Dataset from the Top 15 Downloaded Mobile Applications

This dataset comprises user feedback data collected from 15 globally acclaimed mobile applications, spanning diverse categories. The included applications are among the most downloaded worldwide, providing a rich and varied source for analysis. The dataset is particularly suitable for Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications, such as text classification and topic modeling.

List of Included Applications:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• Facebook
• WhatsApp
• Telegram
• Zoom
• Snapchat
• Facebook Messenger
• Capcut
• Spotify
• YouTube
• HBO Max
• Cash App
• Subway Surfers
• Roblox

Data Columns and Descriptions:

• review_id: Unique identifiers for each user feedback/application review.
• content: User-generated feedback/review in text format.
• score: Rating or star given by the user.
• TU_count: Number of likes/thumbs up (TU) received for the review.
• app_id: Unique identifier for each application.
• app_name: Name of the application.
• RC_ver: Version of the app when the review was created (RC).

Terms of Use:

This dataset is open access for scientific research and non-commercial purposes. Users are required to acknowledge the authors' work and, in the case of scientific publication, cite the most appropriate reference:

1.Paper

M. H. Asnawi, A. A. Pravitasari, T. Herawan, and T. Hendrawati, "The Combination of Contextualized Topic Model and MPNet for User Feedback Topic Modeling," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 130272-130286, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3332644

2.Dataset

Asnawi, M. H., Pravitasari, A. A., Herawan, T., & hendrawati, T. (2023). User Feedback Dataset from the Top 15 Downloaded Mobile Applications [Data set]. In The Combination of Contextualized Topic Model and MPNet for User Feedback Topic Modeling (1.0.0, Vol. 11, pp. 130272–130286). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10204232

Researchers and analysts are encouraged to explore this dataset for insights into user sentiments, preferences, and trends across these top mobile applications. If you have any questions or need further information, feel free to contact the dataset authors.

Unlock valuable insights with the Google Play Store Android Apps Dataset in CSV format, featuring detailed information on over thousands of Android apps available on the Google Play Store. This comprehensive dataset includes key attributes such as App Name, App Logo, Category, Description, Average Rating, Ratings Count, In-app Purchases, Operating System, Company, Content Rating, Images, Email, Additional Information, and more.

Perfect for market researchers, data scientists, app developers, and analysts, this dataset allows for deep analysis of app performance, user preferences, and industry trends. With data on app descriptions, content ratings, in-app purchases, and company information, you can track trends in the mobile app market, evaluate user satisfaction, and conduct competitive analysis.

The dataset is ideal for businesses looking to optimize app strategies, enhance user experience, and improve app performance based on real user feedback. Easily import the data into your favorite analysis tools to gain actionable insights for your app development or research.

With regularly updated data scraped directly from the Google Play Store, the Google Play Store Android Apps Dataset is an invaluable resource for anyone looking to explore trends, track performance, or enhance their app strategies.

This dataset offers a focused and invaluable window into user perceptions and experiences with applications listed on the Apple App Store. It is a vital resource for app developers, product managers, market analysts, and anyone seeking to understand the direct voice of the customer in the dynamic mobile app ecosystem.

Dataset Specifications:

• Investment: $45.0
• Status: Published and immediately available.
• Category: Ratings and Reviews Data
• Format: Compressed ZIP archive containing JSON files, ensuring easy integration into your analytical tools and platforms.
• Volume: Comprises 10,000 unique app reviews, providing a robust sample for qualitative and quantitative analysis of user feedback.
• Timeliness: Last crawled: (This field is blank in your provided info, which means its recency is currently unknown. If this were a real product, specifying this would be critical for its value proposition.)

Richness of Detail (11 Comprehensive Fields):

Each record in this dataset provides a detailed breakdown of a single App Store review, enabling multi-dimensional analysis:

1. Review Content:

   • review: The full text of the user's written feedback, crucial for Natural Language Processing (NLP) to extract themes, sentiment, and common keywords.
   • title: The title given to the review by the user, often summarizing their main point.
   • isEdited: A boolean flag indicating whether the review has been edited by the user since its initial submission. This can be important for tracking evolving sentiment or understanding user behavior.

2. Reviewer & Rating Information:

   • username: The public username of the reviewer, allowing for analysis of engagement patterns from specific users (though not personally identifiable).
   • rating: The star rating (typically 1-5) given by the user, providing a quantifiable measure of satisfaction.

3. App & Origin Context:

   • app_name: The name of the application being reviewed.
   • app_id: A unique identifier for the application within the App Store, enabling direct linking to app details or other datasets.
   • country: The country of the App Store storefront where the review was left, allowing for geographic segmentation of feedback.

4. Metadata & Timestamps:

   • _id: A unique identifier for the specific review record in the dataset.
   • crawled_at: The timestamp indicating when this particular review record was collected by the data provider (Crawl Feeds).
   • date: The original date the review was posted by the user on the App Store.

Expanded Use Cases & Analytical Applications:

This dataset is a goldmine for understanding what users truly think and feel about mobile applications. Here's how it can be leveraged:

• Product Development & Improvement:

  • Bug Detection & Prioritization: Analyze negative review text to identify recurring technical issues, crashes, or bugs, allowing developers to prioritize fixes based on user impact.
  • Feature Requests & Roadmap Prioritization: Extract feature suggestions from positive and neutral review text to inform future product roadmap decisions and develop features users actively desire.
  • User Experience (UX) Enhancement: Understand pain points related to app design, navigation, and overall usability by analyzing common complaints in the review field.
  • Version Impact Analysis: If integrated with app version data, track changes in rating and sentiment after new app updates to assess the effectiveness of bug fixes or new features.

• Market Research & Competitive Intelligence:

  • Competitor Benchmarking: Analyze reviews of competitor apps (if included or combined with similar datasets) to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and user expectations within a specific app category.
  • Market Gap Identification: Discover unmet user needs or features that users desire but are not adequately provided by existing apps.
  • Niche Opportunities: Identify specific use cases or user segments that are underserved based on recurring feedback.

• Marketing & App Store Optimization (ASO):

  • Sentiment Analysis: Perform sentiment analysis on the review and title fields to gauge overall user satisfaction, pinpoint specific positive and negative aspects, and track sentiment shifts over time.
  • Keyword Optimization: Identify frequently used keywords and phrases in reviews to optimize app store listings, improving discoverability and search ranking.
  • Messaging Refinement: Understand how users describe and use the app in their own words, which can inform marketing copy and advertising campaigns.
  • Reputation Management: Monitor rating trends and identify critical reviews quickly to facilitate timely responses and proactive customer engagement.

• Academic & Data Science Research:

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP): The review and title fields are excellent for training and testing NLP models for sentiment analysis, topic modeling, named entity recognition, and text summarization.
  • User Behavior Analysis: Study patterns in rating distribution, isEdited status, and date to understand user engagement and feedback cycles.
  • Cross-Country Comparisons: Analyze country-specific reviews to understand regional differences in app perception, feature preferences, or cultural nuances in feedback.

This App Store Reviews dataset provides a direct, unfiltered conduit to understanding user needs and ultimately driving better app performance and greater user satisfaction. Its structured format and granular detail make it an indispensable asset for data-driven decision-making in the mobile app industry.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Wael Shaher

Released under CC0: Public Domain

Contents

As COVID-19 continues to spread across the world, a growing number of malicious campaigns are exploiting the pandemic. It is reported that COVID-19 is being used in a variety of online malicious activities, including Email scam, ransomware and malicious domains. As the number of the afflicted cases continue to surge, malicious campaigns that use coronavirus as a lure are increasing. Malicious developers take advantage of this opportunity to lure mobile users to download and install malicious apps.

However, besides a few media reports, the coronavirus-themed mobile malware has not been well studied. Our community lacks of the comprehensive understanding of the landscape of the coronavirus-themed mobile malware, and no accessible dataset could be used by our researchers to boost COVID-19 related cybersecurity studies.

We make efforts to create a daily growing COVID-19 related mobile app dataset. By the time of mid-November, we have curated a dataset of 4,322 COVID-19 themed apps, and 611 of them are considered to be malicious. The number is growing daily and our dataset will update weekly. For more details, please visit https://covid19apps.github.io

This dataset includes the following files:

(1) covid19apps.xlsx

In this file, we list all the COVID-19 themed apps information, including apk file hashes, released date, package name, AV-Rank, etc.

(2)covid19apps.zip

We put the COVID-19 themed apps Apk samples in zip files . In order to reduce the size of a single file, we divide the sample into multiple zip files for storage. And the APK file name after the file SHA256.

If your papers or articles use our dataset, please use the following bibtex reference to cite our paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14619

(Accepted to Empirical Software Engineering)

@misc{wang2021virus, title={Beyond the Virus: A First Look at Coronavirus-themed Mobile Malware}, author={Liu Wang and Ren He and Haoyu Wang and Pengcheng Xia and Yuanchun Li and Lei Wu and Yajin Zhou and Xiapu Luo and Yulei Sui and Yao Guo and Guoai Xu}, year={2021}, eprint={2005.14619}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.CR} }

Explore our dataset: 117K doctors' mobile app usage data in TSV format for AI healthcare insights. Ideal for analytics and AI development.

We built a crawler to collect data from the Google Play store including the application's metadata and APK files. The manifest files were extracted from the APK files and then processed to extract the features. The data set is composed of 870,515 records/apps, and for each app we produced 48 features. The data set was used to built and test two bootstrap aggregating of multiple XGBoost machine learning classifiers. The dataset were collected between April 2017 and November 2018. We then checked the status of these applications on three different occasions; December 2018, February 2019, and May-June 2019.

Mobile App

## Overview

Mobile App is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Fruit annotations for 300 images.

## Getting Started

You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.

  ## License

  This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).

This dataset consists of apps needed permissions during installation and run-time. We collect apps from three different sources google play, third-party apps and malware dataset. This file contains more than 5,00,000 Android apps. features extracted at the time of installation and execution. One file contains the name of the features and others contain .apk file corresponding to it extracted permissions and API calls. Benign apps are collected from Google's play store, hiapk, app china, Android, mumayi , gfan slideme, and pandaapp. These .apk files collected from the last three years continuously and contain 81 distinct malware families.

Data used on the Paper: Martin-Domingo, L., & Martin, J. C. (2015). Airport Surface Access and Mobile Apps. Journal of Airline and Airport Management, 5(1), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.3926/jairm.38

Unlock the power of user feedback with our iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, a comprehensive collection of reviews from thousands of apps across various categories. This robust App Store dataset includes essential details such as app names, ratings, user comments, timestamps, and more, offering valuable insights into user experiences and preferences.

Perfect for app developers, marketers, and data analysts, this dataset allows you to conduct sentiment analysis, monitor app performance, and identify trends in user behavior. By leveraging the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, you can refine app features, optimize marketing strategies, and elevate user satisfaction.

Whether you’re tracking mobile app trends, analyzing specific app categories, or developing data-driven strategies, this App Store dataset is an indispensable tool. Download the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset today or contact us for custom datasets tailored to your unique project requirements.

Ready to take your app insights to the next level? Get the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset now or explore our custom data solutions to meet your needs.

This dataset simulates anonymized mobile screen time and app usage data collected from Android/iOS users over a 3-month period (Jan–April 2024). It captures daily usage trends across various app categories including:

Productivity: Google Docs, Notion, Slack

Entertainment: YouTube, Netflix, TikTok

Social Media: Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook

Utilities: Chrome, Gmail, Maps

For YouTube, additional engagement statistics such as views, likes, and comments are included to analyze video popularity and content consumption behavior.

The dataset enables exploration of:

Productivity vs. entertainment screen time patterns

Daily usage fluctuations

App-specific user engagement

Correlation between time spent and user interactions

YouTube content virality metrics

This is a great resource for:

EDA projects

Behavioral clustering

Dashboard development

Time series and anomaly detection

Building recommendation or focus-assistive apps

This comprehensive iOS application reviews dataset contains thousands of authentic user reviews from the Apple App Store in English. The dataset provides valuable insights for app developers, marketers, and researchers studying mobile application performance and user sentiment.

Key Features:

• Real user reviews from popular iOS apps
• Star ratings from 1 to 5 stars
• Review dates and timestamps
• App store URLs and metadata
• User demographics and location data
• App version information
• Review titles and detailed feedback

Applications: Perfect for sentiment analysis, app store optimization, mobile app development research, user experience studies, and competitive analysis. This dataset enables businesses to understand user preferences, identify app improvement opportunities, and develop better mobile applications.

Data Quality: All reviews are genuine user feedback collected from the official Apple App Store, ensuring authenticity and reliability for research and business intelligence purposes. The dataset covers various app categories including fitness, shopping, education, entertainment, and productivity applications.

Of the top 510 mobile gaming apps worldwide, *** collected user data. As of April 2023, Scrabble GO - New Word Game was the most user data-hungry mobile gaming app with a Data Hunger Index score of ****. The app, rated suitable for players aged nine years and above, collected ** different data points and shared the data with third-party advertisers. Tarbi3ah Baloot was ranked second with a Data Hunger Index rating of **** percent.

As of March 2021, YouTube Kids and Facebook Messenger Kids were the mobile apps for children found to collect the largest amount of data from global iOS users. The apps collected a total of 15 data points from each of the examined data types,. Language learning app Lingokids and educational app ABCmouse followed with 10 data points. The type of data that the examined children's apps collected mostoften were contact information and diagnostics.

Children mobile privacy From online education to gaming and social media, children and young users are increasingly active in online environments via mobile devices. In 2021, playing online games and watching YouTube videos figured among the most popular mobile activities for kids worldwide, while less than five in 10 reported using their phones to complete assignments for school. As vulnerable users, children are entitled to institutional protection and lower interference from tech companies. However, mobile apps designed for children still collect data from their young users. As of the beginning of 2022, money management and gaming apps were the app categories found to track the largest number of data segments from children, with 10.1 and 9.3 data points tracked, respectively.

Child proof social media? While the impact of social media on younger users’ development is yet to be fully understood, parents and educators were quick to realize that social media expands the range of dangers children can encounter while being online. In 2021, children in the United States and in the United Kingdom spent an average of 98 minutes per day on TikTok, as well as 83 minutes daily on Snapchat. In the U.S., both Snapchat and TikTok agreed to respect the age limit restrictions set by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and while Snapchat discontinued its children-specific Snapkidz app in 2016, TikTok relies on its TikTok Younger Users platform for users younger than 13. Despite the majority of social media services requiring users to be at least 13 years old, a survey conducted in 2021 in the United Kingdom has found that 60 percent of all surveyed kids aged between eight and 11 had their own social media profile.

App Download Key StatisticsApp and Game DownloadsiOS App and Game DownloadsGoogle Play App and Game DownloadsGame DownloadsiOS Game DownloadsGoogle Play Game DownloadsApp DownloadsiOS App...

As of January 2025, around ** percent of the data linked to users collected by iOS apps was used by app publishers to integrate their product's functionalities. In comparison, ** percent of app data not directly linked to users had the same function. Collecting analytics data was the second most common reason for apps to collect iOS users' data, while only ** percent of identifiable user data and ** percent of non-identifiable users' data went to improve or integrate third-party advertising services.