45 datasets found
  1. t

    COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02_PIN_T - Dataset - CKAN

    • portal.tad3.org
    Updated Nov 17, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02_PIN_T - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://portal.tad3.org/dataset/computers-and-internet-use--dp02_pin_t
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 17, 2024
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02 Universe - Total households Survey-Program - American Community Survey 5-year estimates Years - 2020, 2021, 2022 The 2008 Broadband Improvement Act mandated the collection of data about computer and internet use. As a result, three questions were added to the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS) to measure these topics. The computer use question asked if anyone in the household owned or used a computer and included four response categories for a desktop or laptop, a smartphone, a tablet or other portable wireless computer, and some other type of computer. Respondents selected a checkbox for “Yes” or “No” for each response category. Respondents could select all categories that applied. Question asked if any member of the household has access to the internet. “Access” refers to whether or not someone in the household uses or can connect to the internet, regardless of whether or not they pay for the service. If a respondent answers “Yes, by paying a cell phone company or Internet service provider”, they are asked to select the type of internet service.

  2. g

    Office for National Statistics - Internet and Computer use, London |...

    • gimi9.com
    Updated Nov 20, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2013). Office for National Statistics - Internet and Computer use, London | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/london_internet-and-computer-use-london/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 20, 2013
    Area covered
    London
    Description

    Statistics of how many adults access the internet and use different types of technology covering: home internet access how people connect to the web how often people use the web/computers whether people use mobile devices whether people buy goods over the web whether people carried out specified activities over the internet For more information see the ONS website and the UKDS website.

  3. e

    Mobile Data Collection - Incentive Experiment - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated May 12, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The citation is currently not available for this dataset.
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 12, 2019
    Description

    Ziel dieser Studie war es, den Einfluss verschiedener Anreizsysteme auf die Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der passiven mobilen Datenerfassung unter deutschen Smartphone-Besitzern experimentell zu messen. Die Daten stammen aus einer Webumfrage unter deutschen Smartphone-Nutzern ab 18 Jahren, die aus einem deutschen, nicht wahrscheinlichen Online-Panel rekrutiert wurden. Im Dezember 2017 beantworteten 1.214 Teilnehmer einen Fragebogen zu den Themen Smartphone-Nutzung und -Fähigkeiten, Datenschutz und Sicherheit, allgemeine Einstellungen gegenüber der Umfrageforschung und Forschungseinrichtungen. Darüber hinaus enthielt der Fragebogen ein Experiment zur Bereitschaft, an der mobilen Datenerhebung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen teilzunehmen. Themen: Besitz von Smartphone, Handy, Desktop- oder Laptop-Computer, Tablet-Computer und/oder E-Book-Reader; Art des Smartphones; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der mobilen Datenerfassung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen; Wahrscheinlichkeit des Herunterladens der App zur Teilnahme an dieser Forschungsstudie; Befragter möchte lieber an der Studie teilnehmen, wenn er 100 Euro erhalten könnte; Gesamtbetrag, den der Befragte für die Teilnahme an der Studie verdienen müsste (offene Antwort); Grund, warum der Befragte nicht an der Forschungsstudie teilnehmen würde; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der Studie für einen Anreiz von insgesamt 60 Euro; Bereitschaft zur Aktivierung verschiedener Funktionen beim Herunterladen der App (Interaktionshistorie, Smartphone-Nutzung, Merkmale des sozialen Netzwerks, Netzqualitäts- und Standortinformationen, Aktivitätsdaten); vorherige Einladung zum Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Häufigkeit der Nutzung des Smartphones; Smartphone-Aktivitäten (Browsen, E-Mails, Fotografieren, Anzeigen/Post-Social-Media-Inhalte, Einkaufen, Online-Banking, Installieren von Apps, Verwenden von GPS-fähigen Apps, Verbinden über Bluethooth, Spielen, Streaming von Musik/Videos); Selbsteinschätzung der Kompetenz im Umgang mit dem Smartphone; Einstellung zu Umfragen und Teilnahme an Forschungsstudien (persönliches Interesse, Zeitverlust, Verkaufsgespräch, interessante Erfahrung, nützlich); Vertrauen in Institutionen zum Datenschutz (Marktforschungsunternehmen, Universitätsforscher, Regierungsbehörden wie das Statistische Bundesamt, Mobilfunkanbieter, App-Unternehmen, Kreditkartenunternehmen, Online-Händler und Social-Media-Plattformen); allgemeine Datenschutzbedenken; Gefühl der Datenschutzverletzung durch Banken und Kreditkartenunternehmen, Steuerbehörden, Regierungsbehörden, Marktforschung, soziale Netzwerke, Apps und Internetbrowser; Bedenken zur Datensicherheit bei Smartphone-Aktivitäten für Forschungszwecke (Online-Umfrage, Umfrage-Apps, Forschungs-Apps, SMS-Umfrage, Kamera, Aktivitätsdaten, GPS-Ortung, Bluetooth). Demographie: Geschlecht, Alter; Bundesland; höchster Schulabschluss; höchstes berufliches Bildungsniveau. Zusätzlich verkodet wurden: laufende Nummer; Dauer (Reaktionszeit in Sekunden); Gerätetyp, mit dem der Fragebogen ausgefüllt wurde. The goal of this study was to experimentally measure the influence of different incentive schemes on the willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection among German smartphone owners. The data come from a web survey among German smartphone users 18 years and older who were recruited from a German nonprobability online panel. In December 2017, 1,214 respondents completed a questionnaire on smartphone use and skills, privacy and security concerns, general attitudes towards survey research and research institutions. In addition, the questionnaire included an experiment on the willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions. Topics: Ownership of smartphone, cell phone, desktop or laptop computer, tablet computer, and/or e-book reader; type of smartphone; willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions; likelihood of downloading the app to particiapte in this research study; respondent would rather participate in the study if he could receive 100 euros; total amount to be earned for the respondent ot participate in the study (open answer); reason why the respondent wouldn´t participate in the research study; willlingness to participate in the study for an incentive of 60 euros in total; willingness to activate different functions when downloading the app (interaction history, smartphone usage, charateristics of the social network, network quality and location information, activity data); previous invitation for research app download; research app download; frequency of smartphone use; smartphone activities (browsing, e-mails, taking pictures, view/ post social media content, shopping, online banking, installing apps, using GPS-enabled apps, connecting via Bluethooth, playing games, stream music/ videos); self-assessment of smartphone skills; attitude towards surveys and participaton at research studies (personal interest, waste of time, sales pitch, interesting experience, useful); trust in institutions regarding data privacy (market research companies, university researchers, government authorities such as the Federal Statistical Office, mobile service provider, app companies, credit card companies, online retailer, and social media platforms); general privacy concern; feeling of privacy violation by banks and credit card companies, tax authorities, government agencies, market research, social networks, apps, and internet browsers; concern regarding data security with smartphone activities for research purposes (online survey, survey apps, research apps, SMS survey, camera, activity data, GPS location, Bluetooth). Demography: sex, age; federal state; highest level of school education; highest level of vocational education. Additionally coded was: running number; duration (response time in seconds); device type used to fill out the questionnaire.

  4. ACS Internet Access by Age and Race Variables - Boundaries

    • coronavirus-resources.esri.com
    • resilience.climate.gov
    • +6more
    Updated Dec 7, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2018). ACS Internet Access by Age and Race Variables - Boundaries [Dataset]. https://coronavirus-resources.esri.com/maps/5a1b51d3c6374c3cbb7c9ff7acdba16b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer shows computer ownership and internet access by age and race. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of population age 18 to 64 in households with no computer. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B28005, B28003, B28009B, B28009C, B28009D, B28009E, B28009F, B28009G, B28009H, B28009I Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

  5. e

    Flash Eurobarometer 125 (Internet and the General Public) - Dataset - B2FIND...

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Nov 29, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The citation is currently not available for this dataset.
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2019
    Description

    Internetnutzung. Themen: Internetzugang im Haushalt; Art des Internetzugangs (z.B. über Telefon, ISDN, ADSL, via Kabel oder WLAN); Art der Hardware für den Internetzugang (z.B. PC, Laptop, TV set-top box, Spielkonsole, Mobiltelefon mit WAP, Palm); vorhandene Sicherheitsvorrichtungen am Computer mit Internetzugang (Anti-Virus Software, smart card reader, Verschlüsselungssoftware, Firewall, elektronische Signatur); Orte der Internetnutzung (zu Hause, Arbeitsplatz, Schule, public access point, Cybercafe usw.); Nutzungshäufigkeit; aufgetretene Sicherheitsprobleme bei der Internetnutzung (Virenbefall, Missbrauch der Kreditkartennummer, Spam); durchgeführte Behördenkontakte via Internet; Häufigkeit privater Einkäufe im Internet und Art dabei aufgetretener Probleme (verspätete Lieferung, fehlgeschlagene Lieferungen, keine Rückgabemöglichkeit, Probleme bei der Bezahlung, unzureichende Preisinformationen, schlechter Kundenservice, Missbrauch der persönlichen Daten z.B. in Form von Spam, Probleme mit der Navigation auf den Webseiten der Anbieter, unlautere/irreführende Angebote); Herkunftsregion der Anbieterseiten bei privaten Interneteinkäufen; weitere Nutzungsarten für das Internet: E-Mails, Online-Banking, Nachrichten und Informationsbeschaffung, Gesundheitsinformationen, Jobangebote, Teilnahme an Foren und Chats, Weiterbildung, Reiseinformationen, Ticketbuchungen. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Studienstatus; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Region; Urbanisierungsgrad; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Land; Fragebogennummer; Gewichtungsfaktor. Internet use and online activities. Topics: internet connection at home; type of internet access in the household: standard telephone line, ISDN, ADSL, special modem using the television cable, mobile / wireless connection; internet connection via: desktop computer, laptop, TV set-top box, video game console, mobile telephone, handheld / pocket computer; security features of the aforementioned device: antivirus software, smart card reader or other authentication device, encryption software, firewall software, electronic signature software, other security feature; internet use (at home, at work, at school); frequency of internet use; experienced security problems while using the internet: computer virus, fraudulent use of credit card number, unsolicited e-mail (spamming), other security problems, no problems; contact to public administration via the internet: to find administrative information, send e-mail, carry out procedures online, other reasons, no contact; frequency of purchasing products or services via the internet; experienced problems with regard to shopping on the internet: late delivery, product or service not delivered, no possibility to return faulty or unwanted goods, payment problems, unclear pricing, unsatisfactory communication, unauthorized use of personal data, website navigation problems, misleading offer; purchase of goods and services via websites in the following regions: EU, in Europe but outside the EU, North America, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Oceania; online activities: email, banking, read news, seek health-related information, find job ads, take part in forums, improve training or education, seek information on travels, book event tickets. Demography: sex; age; current type of education; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; region; type of community; household composition and household size. Additionally coded was: country; questionnaire number; weighting factor. Telephone interview Bevölkerung im Alter von 15 Jahren und älter

  6. Ivory Coast CI: Internet Users: Individuals: % of Population

    • ceicdata.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com, Ivory Coast CI: Internet Users: Individuals: % of Population [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/ivory-coast/telecommunication/ci-internet-users-individuals--of-population
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2005 - Dec 1, 2016
    Area covered
    Côte d'Ivoire
    Variables measured
    Phone Statistics
    Description

    Ivory Coast CI: Internet Users: Individuals: % of Population data was reported at 26.527 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 21.885 % for 2015. Ivory Coast CI: Internet Users: Individuals: % of Population data is updated yearly, averaging 1.039 % from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2016, with 23 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26.527 % in 2016 and a record low of 0.000 % in 1990. Ivory Coast CI: Internet Users: Individuals: % of Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Ivory Coast – Table CI.World Bank: Telecommunication. Internet users are individuals who have used the Internet (from any location) in the last 3 months. The Internet can be used via a computer, mobile phone, personal digital assistant, games machine, digital TV etc.; ; International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication/ICT Development Report and database.; Weighted average; Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data.

  7. e

    Flash Eurobarometer 135 (Internet and the Public at Large - General Public)...

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Nov 29, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The citation is currently not available for this dataset.
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2019
    Description

    Internetnutzung und Online-Aktivitäten. Themen: Internetzugang im Haushalt; Art des Internetzugangs (z.B. ISDN, ADSL, WLAN); Art der Hardware für den Internetzugang (z.B. PC, Laptop, digital TV, Spielkonsole, Mobiltelefon mit WAP, Palm); vorhandene Sicherheitsvorrichtungen an einem Computer mit Internetzugang (Anti-Virus Software, Firewall, elektronische Signatur usw.); Orte der Internetnutzung (zu Hause, Arbeitsplatz, Schule, public access point, Cybercafe usw.); Nutzungshäufigkeit; aufgetretene Sicherheitsprobleme bei der Internetnutzung (Virenbefall, Missbrauch der Kreditkartennummer, Spam); durchgeführte Behördenkontakte via Internet; Häufigkeit privater Einkäufe im Internet; Art der aufgetretenen Probleme bei Interneteinkäufen; Herkunftsregion der Anbieterseiten bei privaten Interneteinkäufen; weitere Nutzungsarten für das Internet: E-Mails, online banking, Nachrichten und Informationsbeschaffung, Gesundheitsinformationen, Jobangebote, Teilnahme an Foren und Chats, Weiterbildung, Reiseinformationen, Ticketbuchungen; Vorhandensein einer chronischen Krankheit oder dauerhaften Behinderung beim Befragten sowie dadurch verursachte Einschränkung des Alltagslebens. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Ausbildungsgrad; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Urbanisierungsgrad; Region; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Fragebogennummer; Interviewdatum; Interviewdauer (Interviewbeginn und Interviewende); Gewichtungsfaktor. Internet use and online activities. Topics: internet connection at home; type of internet access in the household: standard telephone line, ISDN, ADSL, special modem using the TV cable, mobile / wireless connection; internet connection via: desktop computer, laptop, TV set-top box, video game console, mobile telephone, handheld / pocket computer; security features of the aforementioned device: antivirus software, smart card reader or other authentication device, encryption software, firewall software, electronic signature software, other security feature; internet use (at home, at work, at school); frequency of internet use; experienced security problems while using the internet: computer virus, fraudulent use of credit card number, unsolicited e-mail (spamming), other security problems, no problems; contact to public administration via the internet: to find administrative information, send e-mail, carry out procedures online, other reasons, no contact; frequency of purchasing products or services via the internet; experienced problems with regard to shopping on the internet: late delivery, product or service not delivered, no possibility to return faulty or unwanted goods, payment problems, unclear pricing, unsatisfactory communication, unauthorized use of personal data, website navigation problems, misleading offer; purchase of goods and services via websites in the following regions: EU, in Europe but outside the EU, North America, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Oceania; online activities: email, banking, read news, seek health-related information, find job ads, take part in forums, improve training or education, seek information on travels, book event tickets; chronic physical or mental health problem; limitation in daily activities due to health problems. Demography: sex; age; current type of education; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community; region; household composition and household size. Additionally coded was: country; questionnaire number; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; weighting factor.

  8. 201 Hours - English(North America) Scripted Monologue Smartphone and PC...

    • nexdata.ai
    • m.nexdata.ai
    Updated Jul 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nexdata (2024). 201 Hours - English(North America) Scripted Monologue Smartphone and PC speech dataset [Dataset]. https://www.nexdata.ai/datasets/speechrecog/33
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Nexdata
    Area covered
    North America
    Variables measured
    Format, Country, Speaker, Language, Accuracy Rate, Content category, Recording device, Recording condition, Language(Region) Code, Features of annotation
    Description

    English(North America) Scripted Monologue Smartphone and PC speech dataset, collected from monologue based on given scripts, covering common expressions. Transcribed with text content and other attributes. Our dataset was collected from extensive and diversify speakers(302 North American), geographicly speaking, enhancing model performance in real and complex tasks.Quality tested by various AI companies. We strictly adhere to data protection regulations and privacy standards, ensuring the maintenance of user privacy and legal rights throughout the data collection, storage, and usage processes, our datasets are all GDPR, CCPA, PIPL complied.

  9. P

    Mobile Phone Dataset | Smartphone & Feature Phone Dataset

    • paperswithcode.com
    Updated Aug 29, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Mobile Phone Dataset | Smartphone & Feature Phone Dataset [Dataset]. https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/mobile-phone-dataset-smartphone-feature-phone
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2022
    Description

    This dataset is collected by DataCluster Labs, India. To download full dataset or to submit a request for your new data collection needs, please drop a mail to: sales@datacluster.ai This dataset is an extremely challenging set of over 3000+ original Mobile Phone images captured and crowdsourced from over 1000+ urban and rural areas, where each image is manually reviewed and verified by computer vision professionals at ****DC Labs.

    Dataset Features

    Dataset size : 3000+ Captured by : Over 1000+ crowdsource contributors Resolution : 99% images HD and above (1920x1080 and above) Location : Captured with 600+ cities accross India Diversity : Various lighting conditions like day, night, varied distances, view points etc. Device used : Captured using mobile phones in 2020-2021 Applications : Mobile Phone detection, cracked screen detection, etc.

    Available Annotation formats COCO, YOLO, PASCAL-VOC, Tf-Record

    To download full datasets or to submit a request for your dataset needs, please ping us at sales@datacluster.ai Visit www.datacluster.ai to know more.

    Note: All the images are manually captured and verified by a large contributor base on DataCluster platform

  10. d

    Swash Web Browsing Clickstream Data - 1.5M Worldwide Users - GDPR Compliant

    • datarade.ai
    .csv, .xls
    Updated Jun 27, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Swash (2023). Swash Web Browsing Clickstream Data - 1.5M Worldwide Users - GDPR Compliant [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/swash-blockchain-bitcoin-and-web3-enthusiasts-swash
    Explore at:
    .csv, .xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Swash
    Area covered
    Uzbekistan, Latvia, Belarus, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Liechtenstein, Russian Federation, Monaco, India, Jordan
    Description

    Unlock the Power of Behavioural Data with GDPR-Compliant Clickstream Insights.

    Swash clickstream data offers a comprehensive and GDPR-compliant dataset sourced from users worldwide, encompassing both desktop and mobile browsing behaviour. Here's an in-depth look at what sets us apart and how our data can benefit your organisation.

    User-Centric Approach: Unlike traditional data collection methods, we take a user-centric approach by rewarding users for the data they willingly provide. This unique methodology ensures transparent data collection practices, encourages user participation, and establishes trust between data providers and consumers.

    Wide Coverage and Varied Categories: Our clickstream data covers diverse categories, including search, shopping, and URL visits. Whether you are interested in understanding user preferences in e-commerce, analysing search behaviour across different industries, or tracking website visits, our data provides a rich and multi-dimensional view of user activities.

    GDPR Compliance and Privacy: We prioritise data privacy and strictly adhere to GDPR guidelines. Our data collection methods are fully compliant, ensuring the protection of user identities and personal information. You can confidently leverage our clickstream data without compromising privacy or facing regulatory challenges.

    Market Intelligence and Consumer Behaviuor: Gain deep insights into market intelligence and consumer behaviour using our clickstream data. Understand trends, preferences, and user behaviour patterns by analysing the comprehensive user-level, time-stamped raw or processed data feed. Uncover valuable information about user journeys, search funnels, and paths to purchase to enhance your marketing strategies and drive business growth.

    High-Frequency Updates and Consistency: We provide high-frequency updates and consistent user participation, offering both historical data and ongoing daily delivery. This ensures you have access to up-to-date insights and a continuous data feed for comprehensive analysis. Our reliable and consistent data empowers you to make accurate and timely decisions.

    Custom Reporting and Analysis: We understand that every organisation has unique requirements. That's why we offer customisable reporting options, allowing you to tailor the analysis and reporting of clickstream data to your specific needs. Whether you need detailed metrics, visualisations, or in-depth analytics, we provide the flexibility to meet your reporting requirements.

    Data Quality and Credibility: We take data quality seriously. Our data sourcing practices are designed to ensure responsible and reliable data collection. We implement rigorous data cleaning, validation, and verification processes, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our clickstream data. You can confidently rely on our data to drive your decision-making processes.

  11. How to choose the right product for your client?

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Mar 23, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julia Beyers (2020). How to choose the right product for your client? [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/juliabeyers/how-to-choose-the-right-product-for-your-client/discussion
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Mar 23, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Julia Beyers
    Description

    https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2F186cf4f6172ca2c696819b7b09931bd3%2Fimage3.jpg?generation=1584955857130173&alt=media" alt="">

    The presence of business in the digital space is a must now. Indeed, there’s hardly any company, be it a small startup or an international corporation, that wouldn’t be available online. For this, the company may use one of two options — to develop an app or a website, or both.

    In the case of a limited budget, business owners often have to make a choice. Thus, considering that mobile traffic bypassed the desktop’s in 2016 and continues to grow, it becomes obvious that the business should become accessible and convenient for smartphone users. But what is better a responsive website or a mobile application?

    Entrepreneurs often turn to development companies to ask this question. Lacking sufficient knowledge, they hope to get answers to their questions from people with experience in this field. So, we decided to compile a guide that will give you clear and understandable information.

    Mobile app

    https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2F0541557795519f24d812f78dfb51867e%2Fimage4.png?generation=1584955894277647&alt=media" alt="">

    Let's look at the stats. It will help you understand why a mobile app may be the obvious choice for your client.

    In 2019, smartphone users installed about 204 billion(!) applications on their devices. On average, this is more than 26 applications per inhabitant of the planet Earth. And if this is not enough evidence, here’s one more point. The expected revenue of mobile applications will be $189 billion in 2020.

    It sounds impressive, but this does not mean that a mobile application is something indispensable for every business. Not at all. Let's go through the pros and cons of a mobile application and try to understand when it is needed.

    Pros

    • A new level of interaction. Mobile applications are a more convenient method of interaction. They load and process content faster. One more useful feature is notifications. Perhaps, applications are the best way to inform users about new updates, promotions, and other news (who will read long letters in the mail?).
    • Personalized targeting. Mobile applications are ideal for products or services that need to be used on an ongoing basis. The options like creating accounts, entering profile information, etc., make applications more personalized than websites. All this allows the business to target their audience more accurately without wasting money.
    • Offline usage. That’s another major advantage. Applications can provide users with access to content without an internet connection.

    Cons

    • Development costs. In order to reach the maximum audience with a mobile app, it is necessary to cover two main operating systems — iOS and Android. Development for each OS can be too expensive for small business owners and they will have to make difficult choices. The way out of this situation is cross-platform development. Why? Because there’s no need to guess which platform targets prefer using — iOS or Android. Instead, you create just one app that runs seamlessly on both platforms.

    • Maintenance. The application is a technical product that needs constant support. Upgrades should be carried out in a timely manner. Often, users need to personally update applications by downloading a new version, which is annoying. Regular bug-fixing for various devices (smartphones, tablets) and different operating systems might be a real problem. Plus, any update should be confirmed by the store where the application is placed.

    • Suitable for businesses that provide interactive and personalized content (refers to all lifestyle and healthcare solutions), require regular app usage (for instance, to-do lists), rely on visual interaction and so on. For games, like Angry Birds, creating an app is also a wise choice.

    Website

    https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2Fd4f5bf1fdd0d0e65fae38c7251f56f13%2Fimage1.jpg?generation=1584955919738648&alt=media" alt="">

    In order to be convenient for users of mobile devices, a website should be responsive. We want to make an emphasis on this since it is critically important. Most of the traffic on the Internet comes from mobile devices, so your website should be adaptable, or in other words, mobile-friendly. If a mobile user needs to zoom in all the necessary elements and text to see something, they will immediately quit your website.

    On the other hand, a responsive website has the following benefits.

    Pros

    • Maintenance. Maintaining a website is less costly. When compared to applications where the user mu...
  12. P

    Is it possible to book American Airlines via mobile phone? Dataset

    • paperswithcode.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Is it possible to book American Airlines via mobile phone? Dataset [Dataset]. https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/is-it-possible-to-book-american-airlines-via
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Description

    Yes, you can book American Airlines flights using your mobile phone by calling ☎️ +1 (888) 502-3360, their direct reservations and customer support line. Whether you use a smartphone browser or call in, ☎️ +1 (888) 502-3360 offers convenient mobile-friendly support. Agents at ☎️ +1 (888) 502-3360 can guide you step-by-step through booking, including fare selection, seating, and payment options. Booking via phone is especially helpful when you’re traveling and don’t have access to a desktop or full website interface. If your internet is slow or you're unsure about options, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 502-3360 ensures you still get your tickets without delay. This number also allows you to ask about baggage, connections, or last-minute changes during the booking process. With ☎️ +1 (888) 502-3360, booking by phone is as reliable and quick as using any app or online tool.

  13. CMR 2018 - Retail Fixed Internet Sector and Broadband Availability

    • open.canada.ca
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 20, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (2018). CMR 2018 - Retail Fixed Internet Sector and Broadband Availability [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/4a4bbe2e-2597-4f57-a77a-dec098999f6b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commissionhttps://crtc.gc.ca/eng/home-accueil.htm
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (hereafter, the Commission) annually collects financial and subscription information on Internet services. In addition, information on the availability of broadband Internet services is collected in partnership with Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED). Also, the Commission conducts research into the data requirements of certain Internet-based audio and video applications. This report presents financial and subscription information over 5 year period from 2013 to 2017. This data is mostly broken into three groups: Incumbent TSPs. Examples of incumbent TSPs include Bell, SaskTel and TELUS. They also include small incumbent TSPs such as Sogetel and Execulink. Cable-based carriers. Examples of cable-based carriers include Rogers, Shaw, and Videotron. Other service providers. The “ Other service providers” category may be further divided into “ other carriers,” such as Xplornet and Allstream Business, and “ resellers,” such as Distributel and TekSavvy. This may also be referred to as resellers, utility telcos and other carriers. Utility telcos are providers of telecommunications services whose market entry, or whose corporate group’ s market entry, into telecommunications services was preceded by a group-member company’ s operations in the electricity, gas, or other utility business. Broadband service availability is calculated using information provided by ISPs. For 2013 to 2015, locations were considered to be serviced if their dissemination block representative point fell within an area of broadband service coverage. As of 2016, ISED pseudohouseholds are used, along with 2016 census demography. Broadband service availability data may not take into account capacity issues or issues regarding line of sight. The information in this section does not take into account upload speeds unless noted. Pseudohouseholds are points representing the population in an area. These points are placed along roadways within each area, and the population of the area, determined by Statistics Canada, is distributed among these points. Additional data regarding addresses and the position of dwellings is used to guide this distribution. The use of pseudohouseholds aims to improve the accuracy of the availability indicators over the use of the assumption that the population within an area is located at the centre of the area. Unless otherwise noted, broadband service availability figures exclude wireless mobile technology and satellite. “ Satellite access services” in this section refer to direct-to-home (DTH) satellite, and not to the technology used to connect communities to the Internet (e.g. satellite link transport). With regard to the Commission’ s research into data requirements, the CRTC used a test environment that aims to replicate how a typical consumer would utilize online streaming and real-time communications services. The services were accessed by a typical wireline residential broadband service, and a national LTE cellular data network, using mainstream off-the-shelf consumer electronics: Android- and iOS-based tablets and phones, smart TVs, Windows-based laptop and desktop computers, and various set-top streaming devices. A web browser was used to access the streaming services on the PCs, and official applications (apps) were used on the other devices.

  14. ACS Internet Access by Education Variables - Boundaries

    • covid-hub.gio.georgia.gov
    • mapdirect-fdep.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 7, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2018). ACS Internet Access by Education Variables - Boundaries [Dataset]. https://covid-hub.gio.georgia.gov/maps/62faad5b76b04b90adf47c020d7406ba
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer shows computer ownership and internet access by education. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of the population age 25+ who are high school graduates (includes equivalency) and have some college or associate's degree in households that have no computer. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B28006 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

  15. Household Survey on Information and Communications Technology 2023 - West...

    • pcbs.gov.ps
    Updated Feb 19, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (2025). Household Survey on Information and Communications Technology 2023 - West Bank and Gaza [Dataset]. https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/PCBS-Metadata-en-v5.2/index.php/catalog/733
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statisticshttp://pcbs.gov.ps/
    Time period covered
    2023 - 2024
    Area covered
    Gaza, West Bank, Palestine, Gaza Strip
    Description

    Abstract

    The Palestinian society's access to information and communication technology tools is one of the main inputs to achieve social development and economic change to the status of Palestinian society; on the basis of its impact on the revolution of information and communications technology that has become a feature of this era. Therefore, and within the scope of the efforts exerted by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics in providing official Palestinian statistics on various areas of life for the Palestinian community, PCBS implemented the household survey for information and communications technology for the year 2023. The main objective of this report is to present the trends of accessing and using information and communication technology by households and individuals in Palestine, and enriching the information and communications technology database with indicators that meet national needs and are in line with international recommendations.

    Geographic coverage

    Palestine, West Bank, Gaza strip

    Analysis unit

    Household, Individual

    Universe

    All Palestinian households and individuals (10 years and above) whose usual place of residence in 2023 was in the state of Palestine.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Sampling Frame The sampling frame consists of master sample which were enumerated in the 2017 census. Each enumeration area consists of buildings and housing units with an average of about 150 households. These enumeration areas are used as primary sampling units (PSUs) in the first stage of the sampling selection.

    Sample Size The sample size is 8,040 households.

    Sampling Design The sample is three stages stratified cluster (pps) sample. The design comprised three stages: Stage (1): Selection a stratified sample of 536 enumeration areas with (pps) method. Stage (2): Selection a stratified random sample of 15 households from each enumeration area selected in the first stage. Stage (3): Selection one person of the (10 years and above) age group in a random method by using KISH TABLES.

    Sample Strata The population was divided by: 1- Governorate (16 governorates, where Jerusalem was considered as two statistical areas) 2- Type of Locality (urban, rural, camps).

    Mode of data collection

    Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaire The survey questionnaire consists of identification data, quality controls and three main sections: Section I: Data on household members that include identification fields, the characteristics of household members (demographic and social) such as the relationship of individuals to the head of household, sex, date of birth and age.

    Section II: Household data include information regarding computer processing, access to the Internet, and possession of various media and computer equipment. This section includes information on topics related to the use of computer and Internet, as well as supervision by households of their children (5-17 years old) while using the computer and Internet, and protective measures taken by the household in the home.

    Section III: Data on Individuals (10 years and above) about computer use, access to the Internet, possession of a mobile phone, information threats, and E-commerce.

    Cleaning operations

    Field Editing and Supervising

    • Data collection and coordination were carried out in the field according to the pre-prepared plan, where instructions, models and tools were available for fieldwork. • Audit process on the PC-Tablet is through the establishment of all automated rules and the office on the program to cover all the required controls according to the criteria specified. • For the privacy of Jerusalem (J1) data were collected in a paper questionnaire. Then the supervisor verifies the questionnaire in a formal and technical manner according to the pre-prepared audit rules. • Fieldwork visits was carried out by the project coordinator, supervisors and project management to check edited questionnaire and the performance of fieldworkers.

    Data Processing

    Programming Consistency Check The data collection program was designed in accordance with the questionnaire's design and its skips. The program was examined more than once before the conducting of the training course by the project management where the notes and modifications were reflected on the program by the Data Processing Department after ensuring that it was free of errors before going to the field.

    Using PC-tablet devices reduced data processing stages, and fieldworkers collected data and sent it directly to server, and project management withdraw the data at any time.

    In order to work in parallel with Jerusalem (J1), a data entry program was developed using the same technology and using the same database used for PC-tablet devices.

    Data Cleaning After the completion of data entry and audit phase, data is cleaned by conducting internal tests for the outlier answers and comprehensive audit rules through using SPSS program to extract and modify errors and discrepancies to prepare clean and accurate data ready for tabulation and publishing.

    Response rate

    The response rate reached 83.7%.

    Sampling error estimates

    Sampling Errors Data of this survey affected by sampling errors due to use of the sample and not a complete enumeration. Therefore, certain differences are expected in comparison with the real values obtained through censuses. Variance were calculated for the most important indicators, there is no problem to disseminate results at the national level and at the level of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

    Non-Sampling Errors Non-Sampling errors are possible at all stages of the project, during data collection or processing. These are referred to non-response errors, response errors, interviewing errors and data entry errors. To avoid errors and reduce their effects, strenuous efforts were made to train the field workers intensively. They were trained on how to carry out the interview, what to discuss and what to avoid, as well as practical and theoretical training during the training course.

    The implementation of the survey encountered non-response where the case (household was not present at home) during the fieldwork visit become the high percentage of the non-response cases. The total non-response rate reached 16.3%.

  16. RICO dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Dec 2, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Onur Gunes (2021). RICO dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/onurgunes1993/rico-dataset/discussion
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Onur Gunes
    Description

    Context

    Data-driven models help mobile app designers understand best practices and trends, and can be used to make predictions about design performance and support the creation of adaptive UIs. This paper presents Rico, the largest repository of mobile app designs to date, created to support five classes of data-driven applications: design search, UI layout generation, UI code generation, user interaction modeling, and user perception prediction. To create Rico, we built a system that combines crowdsourcing and automation to scalably mine design and interaction data from Android apps at runtime. The Rico dataset contains design data from more than 9.3k Android apps spanning 27 categories. It exposes visual, textual, structural, and interactive design properties of more than 66k unique UI screens. To demonstrate the kinds of applications that Rico enables, we present results from training an autoencoder for UI layout similarity, which supports query-by-example search over UIs.

    Content

    Rico was built by mining Android apps at runtime via human-powered and programmatic exploration. Like its predecessor ERICA, Rico’s app mining infrastructure requires no access to — or modification of — an app’s source code. Apps are downloaded from the Google Play Store and served to crowd workers through a web interface. When crowd workers use an app, the system records a user interaction trace that captures the UIs visited and the interactions performed on them. Then, an automated agent replays the trace to warm up a new copy of the app and continues the exploration programmatically, leveraging a content-agnostic similarity heuristic to efficiently discover new UI states. By combining crowdsourcing and automation, Rico can achieve higher coverage over an app’s UI states than either crawling strategy alone. In total, 13 workers recruited on UpWork spent 2,450 hours using apps on the platform over five months, producing 10,811 user interaction traces. After collecting a user trace for an app, we ran the automated crawler on the app for one hour.

    Acknowledgements

    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN https://interactionmining.org/rico

    Inspiration

    The Rico dataset is large enough to support deep learning applications. We trained an autoencoder to learn an embedding for UI layouts, and used it to annotate each UI with a 64-dimensional vector representation encoding visual layout. This vector representation can be used to compute structurally — and often semantically — similar UIs, supporting example-based search over the dataset. To create training inputs for the autoencoder that embed layout information, we constructed a new image for each UI capturing the bounding box regions of all leaf elements in its view hierarchy, differentiating between text and non-text elements. Rico’s view hierarchies obviate the need for noisy image processing or OCR techniques to create these inputs.

  17. Z

    Data from: Login Data Set for Risk-Based Authentication

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Jun 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Thunem, Sigurd (2022). Login Data Set for Risk-Based Authentication [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_6782155
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Thunem, Sigurd
    Lo Iacono, Luigi
    Jørgensen, Paul René
    Wiefling, Stephan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Login Data Set for Risk-Based Authentication

    Synthesized login feature data of >33M login attempts and >3.3M users on a large-scale online service in Norway. Original data collected between February 2020 and February 2021.

    This data sets aims to foster research and development for Risk-Based Authentication (RBA) systems. The data was synthesized from the real-world login behavior of more than 3.3M users at a large-scale single sign-on (SSO) online service in Norway.

    The users used this SSO to access sensitive data provided by the online service, e.g., a cloud storage and billing information. We used this data set to study how the Freeman et al. (2016) RBA model behaves on a large-scale online service in the real world (see Publication). The synthesized data set can reproduce these results made on the original data set (see Study Reproduction). Beyond that, you can use this data set to evaluate and improve RBA algorithms under real-world conditions.

    WARNING: The feature values are plausible, but still totally artificial. Therefore, you should NOT use this data set in productive systems, e.g., intrusion detection systems.

    Overview

    The data set contains the following features related to each login attempt on the SSO:

        Feature
        Data Type
        Description
        Range or Example
    
    
    
    
        IP Address
        String
        IP address belonging to the login attempt
        0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255
    
    
        Country
        String
        Country derived from the IP address
        US
    
    
        Region
        String
        Region derived from the IP address
        New York
    
    
        City
        String
        City derived from the IP address
        Rochester
    
    
        ASN
        Integer
        Autonomous system number derived from the IP address
        0 - 600000
    
    
        User Agent String
        String
        User agent string submitted by the client
        Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; ...
    
    
        OS Name and Version
        String
        Operating system name and version derived from the user agent string
        Windows 10
    
    
        Browser Name and Version
        String
        Browser name and version derived from the user agent string
        Chrome 70.0.3538
    
    
        Device Type
        String
        Device type derived from the user agent string
        (mobile, desktop, tablet, bot, unknown)1
    
    
        User ID
        Integer
        Idenfication number related to the affected user account
        [Random pseudonym]
    
    
        Login Timestamp
        Integer
        Timestamp related to the login attempt
        [64 Bit timestamp]
    
    
        Round-Trip Time (RTT) [ms]
        Integer
        Server-side measured latency between client and server
        1 - 8600000
    
    
        Login Successful
        Boolean
        True: Login was successful, False: Login failed
        (true, false)
    
    
        Is Attack IP
        Boolean
        IP address was found in known attacker data set
        (true, false)
    
    
        Is Account Takeover
        Boolean
        Login attempt was identified as account takeover by incident response team of the online service
        (true, false)
    

    Data Creation

    As the data set targets RBA systems, especially the Freeman et al. (2016) model, the statistical feature probabilities between all users, globally and locally, are identical for the categorical data. All the other data was randomly generated while maintaining logical relations and timely order between the features.

    The timestamps, however, are not identical and contain randomness. The feature values related to IP address and user agent string were randomly generated by publicly available data, so they were very likely not present in the real data set. The RTTs resemble real values but were randomly assigned among users per geolocation. Therefore, the RTT entries were probably in other positions in the original data set.

    The country was randomly assigned per unique feature value. Based on that, we randomly assigned an ASN related to the country, and generated the IP addresses for this ASN. The cities and regions were derived from the generated IP addresses for privacy reasons and do not reflect the real logical relations from the original data set.

    The device types are identical to the real data set. Based on that, we randomly assigned the OS, and based on the OS the browser information. From this information, we randomly generated the user agent string. Therefore, all the logical relations regarding the user agent are identical as in the real data set.

    The RTT was randomly drawn from the login success status and synthesized geolocation data. We did this to ensure that the RTTs are realistic ones.

    Regarding the Data Values

    Due to unresolvable conflicts during the data creation, we had to assign some unrealistic IP addresses and ASNs that are not present in the real world. Nevertheless, these do not have any effects on the risk scores generated by the Freeman et al. (2016) model.

    You can recognize them by the following values:

    ASNs with values >= 500.000

    IP addresses in the range 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10.0.0.0/8 CIDR range)

    Study Reproduction

    Based on our evaluation, this data set can reproduce our study results regarding the RBA behavior of an RBA model using the IP address (IP address, country, and ASN) and user agent string (Full string, OS name and version, browser name and version, device type) as features.

    The calculated RTT significances for countries and regions inside Norway are not identical using this data set, but have similar tendencies. The same is true for the Median RTTs per country. This is due to the fact that the available number of entries per country, region, and city changed with the data creation procedure. However, the RTTs still reflect the real-world distributions of different geolocations by city.

    See RESULTS.md for more details.

    Ethics

    By using the SSO service, the users agreed in the data collection and evaluation for research purposes. For study reproduction and fostering RBA research, we agreed with the data owner to create a synthesized data set that does not allow re-identification of customers.

    The synthesized data set does not contain any sensitive data values, as the IP addresses, browser identifiers, login timestamps, and RTTs were randomly generated and assigned.

    Publication

    You can find more details on our conducted study in the following journal article:

    Pump Up Password Security! Evaluating and Enhancing Risk-Based Authentication on a Real-World Large-Scale Online Service (2022) Stephan Wiefling, Paul René Jørgensen, Sigurd Thunem, and Luigi Lo Iacono. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security

    Bibtex

    @article{Wiefling_Pump_2022, author = {Wiefling, Stephan and Jørgensen, Paul René and Thunem, Sigurd and Lo Iacono, Luigi}, title = {Pump {Up} {Password} {Security}! {Evaluating} and {Enhancing} {Risk}-{Based} {Authentication} on a {Real}-{World} {Large}-{Scale} {Online} {Service}}, journal = {{ACM} {Transactions} on {Privacy} and {Security}}, doi = {10.1145/3546069}, publisher = {ACM}, year = {2022} }

    License

    This data set and the contents of this repository are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. See the LICENSE file for details. If the data set is used within a publication, the following journal article has to be cited as the source of the data set:

    Stephan Wiefling, Paul René Jørgensen, Sigurd Thunem, and Luigi Lo Iacono: Pump Up Password Security! Evaluating and Enhancing Risk-Based Authentication on a Real-World Large-Scale Online Service. In: ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (2022). doi: 10.1145/3546069

    Few (invalid) user agents strings from the original data set could not be parsed, so their device type is empty. Perhaps this parse error is useful information for your studies, so we kept these 1526 entries.↩︎

  18. m

    Annotated Terms of Service of 100 Online Platforms

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Dec 12, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Przemyslaw Palka (2023). Annotated Terms of Service of 100 Online Platforms [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/dtbj87j937.3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2023
    Authors
    Przemyslaw Palka
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The dataset contains information about the contents of 100 Terms of Service (ToS) of online platforms. The documents were analyzed and evaluated from the point of view of the European Union consumer law. The main results have been presented in the table titled "Terms of Service Analysis and Evaluation_RESULTS." This table is accompanied by the instruction followed by the annotators, titled "Variables Definitions," allowing for the interpretation of the assigned values. In addition, we provide the raw data (analyzed ToS, in the folder "Clear ToS") and the annotated documents (in the folder "Annotated ToS," further subdivided).

    SAMPLE: The sample contains 100 contracts of digital platforms operating in sixteen market sectors: Cloud storage, Communication, Dating, Finance, Food, Gaming, Health, Music, Shopping, Social, Sports, Transportation, Travel, Video, Work, and Various. The selected companies' main headquarters span four legal surroundings: the US, the EU, Poland specifically, and Other jurisdictions. The chosen platforms are both privately held and publicly listed and offer both fee-based and free services. Although the sample cannot be treated as representative of all online platforms, it nevertheless accounts for the most popular consumer services in the analyzed sectors and contains a diverse and heterogeneous set.

    CONTENT: Each ToS has been assigned the following information: 1. Metadata: 1.1. the name of the service; 1.2. the URL; 1.3. the effective date; 1.4. the language of ToS; 1.5. the sector; 1.6. the number of words in ToS; 1.7–1.8. the jurisdiction of the main headquarters; 1.9. if the company is public or private; 1.10. if the service is paid or free. 2. Evaluative Variables: remedy clauses (2.1– 2.5); dispute resolution clauses (2.6–2.10); unilateral alteration clauses (2.11–2.15); rights to police the behavior of users (2.16–2.17); regulatory requirements (2.18–2.20); and various (2.21–2.25). 3. Count Variables: the number of clauses seen as unclear (3.1) and the number of other documents referred to by the ToS (3.2). 4. Pull-out Text Variables: rights and obligations of the parties (4.1) and descriptions of the service (4.2)

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The research leading to these results has received funding from the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014-2021, project no. 2020/37/K/HS5/02769, titled “Private Law of Data: Concepts, Practices, Principles & Politics.”

  19. P

    Is QuickBooks Desktop Support Better Than Online Support? Dataset

    • paperswithcode.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bolei Zhou; Aditya Khosla; Agata Lapedriza; Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba (2025). Is QuickBooks Desktop Support Better Than Online Support? Dataset [Dataset]. https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/is-quickbooks-desktop-support-better-than
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Authors
    Bolei Zhou; Aditya Khosla; Agata Lapedriza; Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba
    Description

    How do I contact QuickBooks DesKToP support +1805||243||8832|| What is QuickBooks Premier support number || How do I contact QuickBooks DesKToP support phone number || QuickBooks DesKToP support phone number |+1805||243||8832| QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number+1*805||243||8832

    Data Recovery: Data loss can be a +1805||243||8832 significant concern for businesses. If your QuickBooks DesKToP data files become +1805||243||8832 corrupted or lost, support representatives can assist with recovery options, ensuring that you don’t lose important business data. +1*805||243||8832

    Customizations and Upgrades: +1805||243||8832 QuickBooks DesKToP often requires customizations for specific business needs. Whether you’re integrating the software with third-party applications or setting up +1805||243||8832 unique workflows, the support team can assist with configuration and upgrades to keep your system up-to-date. +1*805||243||8832

    How to Contact QuickBooks DesKToP Support +1*805||243||8832

    To reach QuickBooks DesKToP Support, simply call the support number +1805||243||8832. The team is available to +1805||243||8832 assist with a variety of concerns and is equipped with the expertise to troubleshoot problems, +1805||243||8832 provide guidance, and ensure that the software continues to meet your business needs. When contacting support, make sure to have the following information ready: +1805||243||8832

    Your QuickBooks version: QuickBooks +1*805||243||8832 DesKToP comes in various versions, so it’s important to know which one you are using to receive accurate support.

    Details of the issue: If you’re +1805||243||8832 experiencing an issue, try to gather as much information as possible, such as error codes, +1805||243||8832 descriptions of the problem, and the steps that led up to the issue. +1*805||243||8832

    Account Information: Have your account +1805||243||8832 details ready so the support team can verify your subscription or service and provide faster assistance. +1805||243||8832

    What to Expect When You Call QuickBooks DesKToP Support +1*805||243||8832

    When you call +1805||243||8832, you can expect to speak with a trained support representative who is well-versed in QuickBooks DesKToP. +1805||243||8832 They will likely ask for the following:

    A brief description of the issue you’re facing +1*805||243||8832

    The version of QuickBooks DesKToP you’re using +1*805||243||8832

    Your contact and account information +1*805||243||8832

    Any error codes or screenshots (if applicable) +1*805||243||8832

    The support representative will work +1805||243||8832 with you to diagnose the problem and provide step-by-step instructions to resolve it. +1805||243||8832 If the issue cannot be resolved over the phone, +1805||243||8832 the representative may escalate the matter to a technical expert for further analysis. +1805||243||8832

    Professional Assistance]] How do I contact QuickBooks DesKToP support QuickBooks DesKToP is an invaluable +1805||243||8832 tool for businesses, but like any software, it may encounter issues that require professional assistance. The QuickBooks DesKToP Support number +1805||243||8832 connects you with a team of knowledgeable experts who can help resolve any challenges +1805||243||8832 you may face. Whether you need help with technical issues, installation, +1805||243||8832 data recovery, or billing concerns, the support team is ready +1805||243||8832 to assist and ensure your QuickBooks DesKToP experience is seamless. Don’t hesitate to call +1805||243||8832 and get the support you need for smooth financial management in your business. +1*805||243||8832

    QuickBooks DesKToP phone number +1805||243||8832 || QuickBooks DesKToP contact Number || How Do I Speak With QuickBooks DesKToP Support +1805||243||8832 || How do I contact QuickBooks DesKToP support || QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number +1*805||243||8832

    QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number +1*805||243||8832: Dedicated Assistance for DesKToP Users

    QuickBooks DesKToP is a powerful +1805||243||8832 accounting software designed for larger businesses that require advanced features and integrations. +1805||243||8832 However, DesKToP users may face complex +1805||243||8832 technical challenges requiring specialized support. +1805||243||8832

    How to Reach QuickBooks +1*805||243||8832 DesKToP Support

    QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number: +1805||243||8832 Available 24/7 for priority DesKToP users +1805||243||8832 Users can also access premium +1805||243||8832 support through their QuickBooks subscription ➡Yes, For help with QuickBooks DesKToP 24 hour support, reach out to our support team anytime at +1805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For help with ❞QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number❞, reach out to our support team anytime at +1805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 We’re available 247 to assist with installation.

    ➡For help with ❞QuickBooks DesKToP Support phone number❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting

    ➡For help with ❞QuickBooks DesKToP❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡ For help with QuickBooks DesKToP Support Phone Number, reach out to our support team anytime at📞 +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We’re available 24/7 to assist with installation.

    🛠️☎️How Do I Contact QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number?

    You can contact their DesKToP Support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 or 1.805-2INTUIT for assistance with QB DesKToP Support. They are available to DesKToP Support with any questions or issues you may have regarding DesKToP Support solutions and complex business needs.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks DesKToP Support, reach out to our support team anytime at (+1*805||243||8832 ) or (1-805-243-8832) ). We’re available 24/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks DesKToP Support, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 or 1.805-2INTUIT. We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks DesKToP, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    🛠️☎️How Do I Contact QB DesKToP Support Number?

    For assistance with QuickBooks DesKToP, you can contact their support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 or 1.805.4INTUIT. They are available to help with any questions or issues you may have about DesKToP processing and management.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks DesKToP, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 or 1.805.4INTUIT. We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For Help With ❞QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number❞, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We’re available 24/7 to assist with installation.

    ➡❞QuickBooks DesKToP Phone Number❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For assistance with ➡QB DesKToP Support Number❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 . We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For assistance with ❞QB DesKToP Support Phone Number❞, you can contact their support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT. They are available to help with any questions or issues you may have about the software.

    ➡For help with ❞QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number❞, reach out to our support team anytime at +1805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT. We’re available 247 to assist with installation.

    ➡For help with ❞QuickBooks DesKToP Support Number❞, reach out to our support team anytime at +1805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT. We’re available 247 to assist with installation.

    ➡QuickBooks Premier Support Number❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT. We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    For assistance with ➡QuickBooks Error Support Number❞, please feel free to contact our support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT. . We can assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks Error, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT.. We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    For assistance with QuickBooks DesKToP Errors, you can contact their support team at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT.. They are available to help with any questions or issues you may have about the software.

    ➡For help with QuickBooks DesKToP, reach out to our support team anytime at +1*805||243||8832 or 1||805-243-8832 .4INTUIT.. We’re available 26/7 to assist with installation, setup, and troubleshooting.

    🛠️☎️How Do I Contact QB DesKToP Support Number?

    To contact QuickBooks DesKToP support, call their dedicated helpline at 📞+1*805||243||8832 for assistance with setup, troubleshooting, and more.

  20. Workout Data

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jan 12, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matt Gray (2021). Workout Data [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/drmkgray/workout-data
    Explore at:
    zip(480437722 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 12, 2021
    Authors
    Matt Gray
    Description

    Workout Data

    The dataset provided includes the logged data of my own strength workouts following the 5/3/1 BBB routine. While some insights were derived in an article I published recently, there is an opportunity for the community to benefit from the open sourcing of this data.

    Most notably, I haven't found time to come up with a way of training and applying performance metrics against the data which I have labeled; and I'm hoping that the work I've spent to prepare a decent dataset can be picked up by someone looking to try out computer vision but on a dataset that has a clearer use case than some of the toy datasets that are currently open sourced.

    The goal is to try to build an ML model that takes either phone images or scans of workout sheets, and automatically transfer them into the more structured Excel format for easier data gathering.

    Content

    There are 3 folders contained in the dataset, all files within the folder are datestamped by filename as DD-MM-YYYY: Excel Data This is considerable as the labeled data to a matching phone image or scanned image. There is an Excel file for each workout performed. Phone Images These are images of the filled out workout sheets as taken by my Android phone. More recently I have stopped taking phone images of my workout sheets, but about 85% of the Excel data has a matching phone image. While these images represent a harder challenge for computer vision, the ease of taking these images makes them much more practical as a future deployable mobile application. Scanned Images These are scans of the filled out workout sheets as scanned on my HP Deskjet printer. These scans are higher quality than the mobile images, however the lack of quick and easy access to scanners means that it is harder to gain a userbase as a potential future product.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2024). COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02_PIN_T - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://portal.tad3.org/dataset/computers-and-internet-use--dp02_pin_t

COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02_PIN_T - Dataset - CKAN

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Nov 17, 2024
License

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02 Universe - Total households Survey-Program - American Community Survey 5-year estimates Years - 2020, 2021, 2022 The 2008 Broadband Improvement Act mandated the collection of data about computer and internet use. As a result, three questions were added to the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS) to measure these topics. The computer use question asked if anyone in the household owned or used a computer and included four response categories for a desktop or laptop, a smartphone, a tablet or other portable wireless computer, and some other type of computer. Respondents selected a checkbox for “Yes” or “No” for each response category. Respondents could select all categories that applied. Question asked if any member of the household has access to the internet. “Access” refers to whether or not someone in the household uses or can connect to the internet, regardless of whether or not they pay for the service. If a respondent answers “Yes, by paying a cell phone company or Internet service provider”, they are asked to select the type of internet service.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu