48 datasets found
  1. 5G Traffic Datasets

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Oct 28, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    0913ktg (2022). 5G Traffic Datasets [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kimdaegyeom/5g-traffic-datasets
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Oct 28, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    0913ktg
    Description

    Representative applications that can directly collect 5G da-tasets from mobile terminals without using specialized equipment include G-NetTrack Pro and PCAPdroid. The for-mer allows for the monitoring and logging of the header and payload information of the medium access control (MAC) frame passing through the 5G air interface. The latter is an open-source network capture and monitoring tool that works without root privileges, analyzing connections made by ap-plications installed on the user's mobile device. The latter can also dump mobile traffic to PCAP (also known as libpcap) and send it to the well-known Wireshark for further analysis. We created 5G datasets by measuring 5G traffic directly from a major mobile operator in South Korea. The model name of the mobile terminal used for traffic measurement is the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and it was equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X50 5G modem. The packet sniffer software used for traffic measurement, PCAPdroid, was in-stalled in the terminal through Google play. Traffic was measured sequentially per application on two stationary ter-minals (only one terminal was used for non-interactive ser-vices) with no background traffic. The collected dataset is representative resource-intensive video traffic that has the greatest impact on 5G network planning and provisioning, and background traffic was not mixed to measure the unique characteristics of each type of traffic. The video streaming dataset includes data directly meas-ured while watching Netflix and Amazon Prime, which are representative over-the-top (OTT) services, on mobile devic-es. The live streaming dataset was measured while watching YouTube Live and South Korea's representative live broad-casts (Naver NOW and Afreeca TV). Video conferencing data were measured by holding an actual meeting on the widely used Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Meet platform. Two types of metaverse traffic were acquired: Zepeto and Roblox. Zepeto traffic was collected while staying in the 'camping world' for 15 hours. Roblox traffic was collected over 25 hours of playing the 'Collect All Pets' game using an auto clicker. We collected two types of mobile network gaming traffic. The first was cloud gaming, an online game setup that runs video games on remote servers and streams them direct-ly to the user's device. The second was a traditional mobile game connected to the Internet. The dataset was collected from May to October 2022, is a massive 328 hours in total, and is provided in the csv file format. The dataset we collected is a timestamp-mapped time series dataset with packet header information, and traffic analysis by application is possible because it includes source and destination addresses. To make it more usable as a traffic source model, Section III describes how to use it as a training dataset for the traffic simulator platform's source generator.

    A 5G traffic dataset measured by PCAPdroid has been re-leased and can be used as a training dataset for various ML models. However, since the size of this dataset is very large, it is inconvenient to handle, and additional data preprocessing is required to use it for its intended purpose.

    This data set can be used to learn GANs, time-series forcasting deep learning models.

    Our implementation is given on GitHub. https://github.com/0913ktg/5G-Traffic-Generator

  2. YouTube Dataset on Mobile Streaming for Internet Traffic Modeling, Network...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Apr 14, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Frank Loh; Florian Wamser; Fabian Poignée; Stefan Geißler; Tobias Hoßfeld (2022). YouTube Dataset on Mobile Streaming for Internet Traffic Modeling, Network Management, and Streaming Analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19096823.v2
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 14, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Frank Loh; Florian Wamser; Fabian Poignée; Stefan Geißler; Tobias Hoßfeld
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    YouTube
    Description

    Streaming is by far the predominant type of traffic in communication networks. With thispublic dataset, we provide 1,081 hours of time-synchronous video measurements at network, transport, and application layer with the native YouTube streaming client on mobile devices. The dataset includes 80 network scenarios with 171 different individual bandwidth settings measured in 5,181 runs with limited bandwidth, 1,939 runs with emulated 3G/4G traces, and 4,022 runs with pre-defined bandwidth changes. This corresponds to 332GB video payload. We present the most relevant quality indicators for scientific use, i.e., initial playback delay, streaming video quality, adaptive video quality changes, video rebuffering events, and streaming phases.

  3. i

    Mobile vs Desktop Usage Statistics 2025

    • innersparkcreative.com
    html
    Updated Sep 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inner Spark Creative (2025). Mobile vs Desktop Usage Statistics 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.innersparkcreative.com/news/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-statistics-2025-verified
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Inner Spark Creative
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Verified dataset of 2025 device usage: share of global web traffic, mobile commerce share of transactions, US daily time spent, app vs web breakdown, and tablet decline.

  4. m

    Mobile Web Clickstream | 1st Party | 3B+ events verified, US consumers |...

    • omnitrafficdata.mfour.com
    • datarade.ai
    Updated Aug 1, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MFour (2021). Mobile Web Clickstream | 1st Party | 3B+ events verified, US consumers | Safari, Chrome, any iOS or Android [Dataset]. https://omnitrafficdata.mfour.com/products/mobile-web-clickstream-1st-party-3b-events-verified-us-mfour
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MFour
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset encompasses mobile web clickstream behavior on any browser, collected from over 150,000 triple-opt-in first-party US Daily Active Users (DAU). Use it for measurement, attribution or path to purchase and consumer journey understanding. Full URL deliverable available including searches.

  5. C

    Local SEO Analytics Dataset

    • caseysseo.com
    csv, pdf
    Updated Jan 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Miller (2025). Local SEO Analytics Dataset [Dataset]. https://caseysseo.com/local-seo-analytics
    Explore at:
    pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Casey's SEO
    Authors
    Casey Miller
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Citation Consistency, Local Keyword Rankings, Google Business Profile Views, Google Business Profile Clicks, Mobile vs Desktop Local Search, Conversion Rate from Local Traffic, Organic Traffic from Local Searches, Colorado Springs Mobile Search Growth
    Measurement technique
    Competitive analysis, Conversion tracking, Customer surveys, Industry benchmarking
    Description

    This dataset provides detailed insights and best practices for tracking and measuring local SEO performance across a range of critical metrics, including Google Business Profile engagement, local keyword rankings, website traffic from local searches, citation management, mobile optimization, and ROI calculation. The data is based on expert analysis and recommendations to help local businesses optimize their local search visibility and drive measurable results.

  6. m

    Omnichannel Consumer Behaviors | 1st Party | 3B+ events verified, US...

    • omnitrafficdata.mfour.com
    • datarade.ai
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MFour, Omnichannel Consumer Behaviors | 1st Party | 3B+ events verified, US consumers | Path to purchase across app, web and point of interest locations [Dataset]. https://omnitrafficdata.mfour.com/products/omnichannel-consumer-journeys-1st-party-3b-events-verifi-mfour
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MFour
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset encompasses mobile app usage, web clickstream and location visitation behavior, collected from over 150,000 triple-opt-in first-party US Daily Active Users (DAU). The only omnichannel meter at scale representing iOS and Android platforms.

  7. Passive Operating System Fingerprinting Revisited - Network Flows Dataset

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    zip
    Updated Feb 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Martin Laštovička; Martin Laštovička; Martin Husák; Martin Husák; Petr Velan; Petr Velan; Tomáš Jirsík; Tomáš Jirsík; Pavel Čeleda; Pavel Čeleda (2023). Passive Operating System Fingerprinting Revisited - Network Flows Dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7635138
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Martin Laštovička; Martin Laštovička; Martin Husák; Martin Husák; Petr Velan; Petr Velan; Tomáš Jirsík; Tomáš Jirsík; Pavel Čeleda; Pavel Čeleda
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    For the evaluation of OS fingerprinting methods, we need a dataset with the following requirements:

    • First, the dataset needs to be big enough to capture the variability of the data. In this case, we need many connections from different operating systems.
    • Second, the dataset needs to be annotated, which means that the corresponding operating system needs to be known for each network connection captured in the dataset. Therefore, we cannot just capture any network traffic for our dataset; we need to be able to determine the OS reliably.

    To overcome these issues, we have decided to create the dataset from the traffic of several web servers at our university. This allows us to address the first issue by collecting traces from thousands of devices ranging from user computers and mobile phones to web crawlers and other servers. The ground truth values are obtained from the HTTP User-Agent, which resolves the second of the presented issues. Even though most traffic is encrypted, the User-Agent can be recovered from the web server logs that record every connection’s details. By correlating the IP address and timestamp of each log record to the captured traffic, we can add the ground truth to the dataset.

    For this dataset, we have selected a cluster of five web servers that host 475 unique university domains for public websites. The monitoring point recording the traffic was placed at the backbone network connecting the university to the Internet.

    The dataset used in this paper was collected from approximately 8 hours of university web traffic throughout a single workday. The logs were collected from Microsoft IIS web servers and converted from W3C extended logging format to JSON. The logs are referred to as web logs and are used to annotate the records generated from packet capture obtained by using a network probe tapped into the link to the Internet.

    The entire dataset creation process consists of seven steps:

    1. The packet capture was processed by the Flowmon flow exporter (https://www.flowmon.com) to obtain primary flow data containing information from TLS and HTTP protocols.
    2. Additional statistical features were extracted using GoFlows flow exporter (https://github.com/CN-TU/go-flows).
    3. The primary flows were filtered to remove incomplete records and network scans.
    4. The flows from both exporters were merged together into records containing fields from both sources.
    5. Web logs were filtered to cover the same time frame as the flow records.
    6. Web logs were paired with the flow records based on shared properties (IP address, port, time).
    7. The last step was to convert the User-Agent values into the operating system using a Python version of the open-source tool ua-parser (https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-python). We replaced the unstructured User-Agent string in the records with the resulting OS.

    The collected and enriched flows contain 111 data fields that can be used as features for OS fingerprinting or any other data analyses. The fields grouped by their area are listed below:

    • basic flow properties - flow_ID;start;end;L3 PROTO;L4 PROTO;BYTES A;PACKETS A;SRC IP;DST IP;TCP flags A;SRC port;DST port;packetTotalCountforward;packetTotalCountbackward;flowDirection;flowEndReason;
    • IP parameters - IP ToS;maximumTTLforward;maximumTTLbackward;IPv4DontFragmentforward;IPv4DontFragmentbackward;
    • TCP parameters - TCP SYN Size;TCP Win Size;TCP SYN TTL;tcpTimestampFirstPacketbackward;tcpOptionWindowScaleforward;tcpOptionWindowScalebackward;tcpOptionSelectiveAckPermittedforward;tcpOptionSelectiveAckPermittedbackward;tcpOptionMaximumSegmentSizeforward;tcpOptionMaximumSegmentSizebackward;tcpOptionNoOperationforward;tcpOptionNoOperationbackward;synAckFlag;tcpTimestampFirstPacketforward;
    • HTTP - HTTP Request Host;URL;
    • User-agent - UA OS family;UA OS major;UA OS minor;UA OS patch;UA OS patch minor;
    • TLS - TLS_CONTENT_TYPE;TLS_HANDSHAKE_TYPE;TLS_SETUP_TIME;TLS_SERVER_VERSION;TLS_SERVER_RANDOM;TLS_SERVER_SESSION_ID;TLS_CIPHER_SUITE;TLS_ALPN;TLS_SNI;TLS_SNI_LENGTH;TLS_CLIENT_VERSION;TLS_CIPHER_SUITES;TLS_CLIENT_RANDOM;TLS_CLIENT_SESSION_ID;TLS_EXTENSION_TYPES;TLS_EXTENSION_LENGTHS;TLS_ELLIPTIC_CURVES;TLS_EC_POINT_FORMATS;TLS_CLIENT_KEY_LENGTH;TLS_ISSUER_CN;TLS_SUBJECT_CN;TLS_SUBJECT_ON;TLS_VALIDITY_NOT_BEFORE;TLS_VALIDITY_NOT_AFTER;TLS_SIGNATURE_ALG;TLS_PUBLIC_KEY_ALG;TLS_PUBLIC_KEY_LENGTH;TLS_JA3_FINGERPRINT;
    • Packet timings - NPM_CLIENT_NETWORK_TIME;NPM_SERVER_NETWORK_TIME;NPM_SERVER_RESPONSE_TIME;NPM_ROUND_TRIP_TIME;NPM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUTS_A;NPM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUTS_B;NPM_TCP_RETRANSMISSION_A;NPM_TCP_RETRANSMISSION_B;NPM_TCP_OUT_OF_ORDER_A;NPM_TCP_OUT_OF_ORDER_B;NPM_JITTER_DEV_A;NPM_JITTER_AVG_A;NPM_JITTER_MIN_A;NPM_JITTER_MAX_A;NPM_DELAY_DEV_A;NPM_DELAY_AVG_A;NPM_DELAY_MIN_A;NPM_DELAY_MAX_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_1_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_2_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_3_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_4_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_5_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_6_A;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_7_A;NPM_JITTER_DEV_B;NPM_JITTER_AVG_B;NPM_JITTER_MIN_B;NPM_JITTER_MAX_B;NPM_DELAY_DEV_B;NPM_DELAY_AVG_B;NPM_DELAY_MIN_B;NPM_DELAY_MAX_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_1_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_2_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_3_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_4_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_5_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_6_B;NPM_DELAY_HISTOGRAM_7_B;
    • ICMP - ICMP TYPE;

    The details of OS distribution grouped by the OS family are summarized in the table below. The Other OS family contains records generated by web crawling bots that do not include OS information in the User-Agent.

    OS FamilyNumber of flows
    Other42474
    Windows40349
    Android10290
    iOS8840
    Mac OS X5324
    Linux1589
    Ubuntu653
    Fedora88
    Chrome OS53
    Symbian OS1
    Slackware1
    Linux Mint1

  8. UNB CIC IOT 2023 Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Madhav Malhotra (2023). UNB CIC IOT 2023 Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/madhavmalhotra/unb-cic-iot-dataset
    Explore at:
    zip(2978571232 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 6, 2023
    Authors
    Madhav Malhotra
    Description

    Description

    This dataset is from the University of New Brunswick Centre for Cybersecurity.

    It has extracted CSV features on network traffic across 105 Internet of Things (IoT) devices with 33 cyberattacks run on them. 7 types of attacks were run: distributed denial of service (DDoS), denial of service (DoS), reconnaissance, web-based, brute-force, spoofing, and the Mirai botnet.

    Licence

    To quote the centre's website: "You may redistribute, republish, and mirror our datasets in any form; however, any use or redistribution of the data must include a citation to the dataset and the research paper listed on the webpage."

    Citation E. C. P. Neto, S. Dadkhah, R. Ferreira, A. Zohourian, R. Lu, A. A. Ghorbani. "CICIoT2023: A real-time dataset and benchmark for large-scale attacks in IoT environment," Sensor (2023) – (submitted to Journal of Sensors).

    Features

    FeatureDescription
    tsTimestamp of first packet in flow
    flow_durationTime between first and last packet received in flow
    Header_LengthLength of packet header in bits
    Protocol TypeProtocol numbers, as defined by the IANA. Ex: 1 = ICMP, 6 = TCP
    DurationTime-to-Live (ttl)
    RateRate of packet transmission in a flow
    SrateRate of outbound (sent) packets transmission in a flow
    DrateRate of inbound (received) packets transmission in a flow
    fin_flag_numberFin flag value
    syn_flag_numberSyn flag value
    rst_flag_numberRst flag value
    psh_flag_numbePsh flag value
    ack_flag_numberAck flag value
    ece_flag_numberEce flag value
    cwr_flag_numberCwr flag value
    ack_countNumber of packets with ack flag set in the same flow
    syn_countNumber of packets with syn flag set in the same flow
    fin_countNumber of packets with fin flag set in the same flow
    urg_countNumber of packets with urg flag set in the same flow
    rst_countNumber of packets with rst flag set in the same flow
    HTTPIndicates if the application layer protocol is HTTP
    HTTPSIndicates if the application layer protocol is HTTPS
    DNSIndicates if the application layer protocol is DNS
    TelnetIndicates if the application layer protocol is Telnet
    SMTPIndicates if the application layer protocol is SMTP
    SSHIndicates if the application layer protocol is SSH
    IRCIndicates if the application layer protocol is IRC
    TCPIndicates if the transport layer protocol is TCP
    UDPIndicates if the transport layer protocol is UDP
    DHCPIndicates if the application layer protocol is DHCP
    ARPIndicates if the link layer protocol is ARP
    ICMPIndicates if the network layer protocol is ICMP
    IPvIndicates if the network layer protocol is IP
    LLCIndicates if the link layer protocol is LLC
    Tot_sumSummation of packets lengths in flow
    MinMinimum packet length in the flow
    MaxMaximumpacket length in the flow
    AVGAverage packet length in the flow
    StdStandard deviation of packet length in the flow
    Tot_sizePacket’s length
    IATThe time difference with the previous packet
    NumberThe number of packets in the flow
    Magnitudesqrt(Average of the lengths of incoming packets in the flow + average of the lengths of outgoing packets in the flow)
    Radiussqrt(Variance of the lengths of incoming packets in the flow +variance of the lengths of outgoing packets in the flow)
    CovarianceCovariance of the lengths of incoming and outgoing packets
    VarianceVariance of the lengths of incoming packets in the flow/variance of the lengths of outgoing packets in the flow
    WeightNumber of incoming packets × Number of outgoing packets
    labelNotes the type of attack being run or 'BenignTraffic' for no attack run

    Devices

    Device NameCategoryMAC AddressDevice NameCategoryMAC Address
    Amazon Alexa Echo Dot 1Audio1C:FE:2B:98:16:DDLumiman bulbLighting84:E3...
  9. r

    Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025

    • redstagfulfillment.com
    html
    Updated May 19, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Red Stag Fulfillment (2025). Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025 [Dataset]. https://redstagfulfillment.com/how-many-daily-visits-does-amazon-receive/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 19, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Red Stag Fulfillment
    Time period covered
    2019 - 2025
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Daily website visits, Monthly traffic volume, Geographic distribution, Seasonal traffic patterns, Traffic sources breakdown, Mobile vs desktop traffic split
    Description

    Comprehensive dataset analyzing Amazon's daily website visits, traffic patterns, seasonal trends, and comparative analysis with other ecommerce platforms based on May 2025 data.

  10. Number of global social network users 2017-2028

    • statista.com
    • de.statista.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Number of global social network users 2017-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    How many people use social media?

                  Social media usage is one of the most popular online activities. In 2024, over five billion people were using social media worldwide, a number projected to increase to over six billion in 2028.
    
                  Who uses social media?
                  Social networking is one of the most popular digital activities worldwide and it is no surprise that social networking penetration across all regions is constantly increasing. As of January 2023, the global social media usage rate stood at 59 percent. This figure is anticipated to grow as lesser developed digital markets catch up with other regions
                  when it comes to infrastructure development and the availability of cheap mobile devices. In fact, most of social media’s global growth is driven by the increasing usage of mobile devices. Mobile-first market Eastern Asia topped the global ranking of mobile social networking penetration, followed by established digital powerhouses such as the Americas and Northern Europe.
    
                  How much time do people spend on social media?
                  Social media is an integral part of daily internet usage. On average, internet users spend 151 minutes per day on social media and messaging apps, an increase of 40 minutes since 2015. On average, internet users in Latin America had the highest average time spent per day on social media.
    
                  What are the most popular social media platforms?
                  Market leader Facebook was the first social network to surpass one billion registered accounts and currently boasts approximately 2.9 billion monthly active users, making it the most popular social network worldwide. In June 2023, the top social media apps in the Apple App Store included mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram Messenger, as well as the ever-popular app version of Facebook.
    
  11. SEO Performance Data - UrbanScape Apparel

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SakshiAndhale (2024). SEO Performance Data - UrbanScape Apparel [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sakshiandhale62442/seo-performance-data-urbanscape-apparel
    Explore at:
    zip(3319315 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 25, 2024
    Authors
    SakshiAndhale
    Description

    Understanding: UrbanScape Apparel SEO Performance Final Dataset

    Company: BrightWave Digital Department: Digital Marketing & SEO Team Industry: E-commerce (fashion and lifestyle products) Brand: UrbanScape Apparel

    Story

    BrightWave Digital is a fast-growing digital marketing agency that handles full-spectrum SEO, SEM, and content marketing for various clients. The SEO team is tasked with pushing UrbanScape Apparel, a sustainable fashion brand, to the top of the search rankings. The brand sells eco-friendly clothing and accessories aimed at environmentally conscious consumers in North America.

    UrbanScape Apparel has recently expanded its product lines and introduced new collections, such as “Urban Outdoors” for hiking gear and “EcoActive” for athleisure. With increased competition in the eco-fashion market, BrightWave Digital’s SEO team must optimize UrbanScape’s site performance, monitor SEO metrics closely, and demonstrate measurable improvements in organic traffic and conversions.

    Objectives

    Improve rankings for high-intent keywords like "eco-friendly clothing" and "sustainable outdoor gear." Boost organic traffic from both mobile and desktop devices. Increase visibility through backlinks from high domain authority (DA) sites. Optimize Core Web Vitals to ensure the site ranks higher in Google’s search results. The dashboard data includes traffic, keyword rankings, click-through rates (CTR), and other performance metrics to track how well the SEO efforts are contributing to the brand’s growth.

    Column Description

    1. Date Definition: The specific day for which the data is collected. Importance: Allows tracking of daily trends and pinpointing specific dates of spikes or drops in performance.

    2. Month Definition: The month corresponding to the data being analyzed. Importance: Helps in understanding monthly trends and seasonal patterns in traffic and user behavior.

    3. Year Definition: The year in which the data was recorded. Importance: Essential for long-term trend analysis and year-over-year performance comparisons.

    4. Quarter Definition: The fiscal quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) for the given data. Importance: Useful for quarterly business reviews and strategy adjustments based on performance.

    5. Time Of Day Definition: The specific time range (e.g., morning, afternoon, evening) when the traffic or engagement was recorded. Importance: Helps in understanding peak traffic times and optimizing content publishing schedules.

    6. Primary Keywords Definition: The main keywords targeted for SEO, typically with high search volume and relevance to the brand. Importance: Crucial for understanding the focus of the SEO strategy and the effectiveness of ranking for these terms.

    7. Secondary Keywords Definition: Additional keywords that complement primary keywords, often with lower competition and specific niches. Importance: Provides insights into secondary areas of focus that can still drive significant traffic and conversions.

    8. Long-Tail Keywords Definition: More specific keyword phrases usually consisting of three or more words, targeting niche search queries. Importance: Important for attracting highly targeted traffic and often associated with higher conversion rates.

    9. Location Definition: Geographic region from where the traffic is coming. Importance: Helps in understanding regional performance and tailoring content or promotions to specific markets.

    10. Social Media Source Definition: The social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Pinterest) from which traffic is referred to the site. Importance: Measures the impact of social media channels on website traffic and engagement.

    11. Media Type Definition: The format of the media content (e.g., image, video, article) driving traffic. Importance: Analyzes which media types resonate best with the audience and contribute to higher engagement.

    12. Device Type Definition: The type of device used by visitors (e.g., mobile, desktop, tablet) to access the website. Importance: Essential for optimizing user experience across different devices and identifying potential issues.

    13. Organic Traffic Definition: The number of visitors coming to the site through unpaid search results. Importance: Shows how well the site is performing in attracting users through SEO efforts without relying on paid advertising.

    14. Keywords Ranking Definition: The position of targeted keywords in search engine results pages (SERPs). Importance: Indicates the effectiveness of SEO strategies in improving keyword visibility and competitiveness.

    15. Clicks Definition: The number of times users click on the site’s links from search results. Importance: Reflects user interest and relevance of the search snippets or ads shown to users.

    16. Impressions Definition: The number of times a site appears in search r...

  12. Z

    Data from: Energy-Saving Strategies for Mobile Web Apps and their...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Mar 13, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Benedikt Dornauer; Michael Felderer (2023). Energy-Saving Strategies for Mobile Web Apps and their Measurement: Results from a Decade of Research - Dataset [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7698282
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute for Software Technology, 51147 Cologne, Germany; University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany;
    University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
    Authors
    Benedikt Dornauer; Michael Felderer
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In 2022, over half of the web traffic was accessed through mobile devices. By reducing the energy consumption of mobile web apps, we can not only extend the battery life of our devices, but also make a significant contribution to energy conservation efforts. For example, if we could save only 5% of the energy used by web apps, we estimate that it would be enough to shut down one of the nuclear reactors in Fukushima. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of energy-saving experiments and related approaches for mobile web apps, relevant for researchers and practitioners. To achieve this objective, we conducted a systematic literature review and identified 44 primary studies for inclusion. Through the mapping and analysis of scientific papers, this work contributes: (1) an overview of the energy-draining aspects of mobile web apps, (2) a comprehensive description of the methodology used for the energy-saving experiments, and (3) a categorization and synthesis of various energy-saving approaches.

  13. Facebook users worldwide 2017-2027

    • statista.com
    • de.statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Facebook users worldwide 2017-2027 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    The global number of Facebook users was forecast to continuously increase between 2023 and 2027 by in total 391 million users (+14.36 percent). After the fourth consecutive increasing year, the Facebook user base is estimated to reach 3.1 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2027. Notably, the number of Facebook users was continuously increasing over the past years. User figures, shown here regarding the platform Facebook, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

  14. e

    Посещаемость веб-сайта с использованием | AI website traffic by - Dataset -...

    • repository.econdata.tech
    Updated Nov 5, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Посещаемость веб-сайта с использованием | AI website traffic by - Dataset - Репозиторий данных [Dataset]. https://repository.econdata.tech/dataset/statisti-5334
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 5, 2025
    Description

    Определение: Общий трафик на 15 сайтов с искусственным интеллектом со стационарных и мобильных компьютеров в каждой стране. [Переведено с en: английского языка] Тематическая область: Информационно-коммуникационные технологии [Переведено с en: английского языка] Область применения: Искусственный интеллект [Переведено с en: английского языка] Единица измерения: Количество посещений [Переведено с en: английского языка] Примечание: Similarweb не предоставляет точных данных о количестве посещений веб-сайтов, которые посещают менее 5000 человек. В этих случаях используется приблизительная оценка в 4999 посещений. [Переведено с es: испанского языка] Источник данных: Цифровая обсерватория Десарролло (ODD) на основе Similarweb [Переведено с es: испанского языка] Последнее обновление: Feb 9 2024 1:04PM Организация-источник: Экономическая комиссия по Латинской Америке и Карибскому бассейну [Переведено с en: английского языка] Definition: Total traffic to 15 artificial intelligence sites from fixed and mobile computers per country. Thematic Area: Information and Communication Technologies Application Area: Artificial intelligence Unit of Measurement: Number of visits Note: Similarweb does not provide an exact number of visits for websites that receive fewer than 5,000 visits. In these cases, an approximate estimate of 4,999 is used. Data Source: Observatorio de Desarrollo Digital (ODD) based on Similarweb Last Update: Feb 9 2024 1:04PM Source Organization: Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean

  15. Corporate network dataset

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Luis Fhelipe Ribeiro (2025). Corporate network dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/luisfheliperibeiro/corporate-network-dataset
    Explore at:
    zip(116752218 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2025
    Authors
    Luis Fhelipe Ribeiro
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    General Description

    This dataset was developed from real data on the usage of the corporate data network at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). The main objective is to enable detailed observation of the university's network infrastructure and make this data available to the academic community. Data collection started on August 30, 2023, with the last query conducted on February 7, 2025, covering a total of approximately 19 months of continuous observations. During this period, about 1.5 months of data were lost due to failures in the data collection process or maintenance of the system responsible for capturing the data.

    The data collections cover administrative, academic, and classroom sectors, spanning a total of 13 buildings within the university, providing a broad view of the network across different environments.

    The dataset contains a total of 1,675,843 entries, each with 49 attributes.

    Dataset Attributes, by Category

    1. Connected Machines and ARP (8 attributes)

    • Number of Access, Wi-Fi, Security, and VoIP Machines: Indicates the number of machines connected to each type of network, providing insight into the network size and device load.
    • ARP Value for Access, Wi-Fi, Security, and VoIP: Refers to the number of entries in the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) table associated with each type of network. ARP is used to map IP addresses to MAC addresses and can indicate potential connectivity issues.

    2. Traffic Metrics (18 attributes)

    • Packet and Byte: Indicates whether the information queried is accounted in packets or transmitted bytes, with positive (1) or negative (-1) values.
    • Downlink and Uplink Bandwidth by Packets (Access, Wi-Fi, Security, VoIP): Refers to the number of packets received or sent by devices connected to each network type.
    • Downlink and Uplink Bandwidth by Bytes (Access, Wi-Fi, Security, VoIP): Refers to the number of bytes received or sent by devices connected to each network type.

    3. Collection Context (5 attributes)

    • Sector: The sector from which the data was collected (academic, administrative, or classroom).
    • Date: The date of the data collection.
    • Time of Day: The time period of the collection (morning, afternoon, or evening).
    • Day of the Week: The day of the week when the collection occurred.
    • Hour: The hour of the collection.

    4. Asset Identification (4 attributes)

    • Asset IP: The IP address of the monitored device.
    • Asset Model: The model of the network device.
    • Asset Part Number: The part number of the device.
    • Asset Firmware: The firmware version in use on the device.

    5. Asset Performance (6 attributes)

    • CPU Usage (% - 1 min and 5 min): The percentage of CPU usage on the device in the last minute and the last five minutes.
    • Memory Used (%): The percentage of memory used by the device.
    • Total and Used Memory (Kb): The total amount and the used amount of memory on the device, measured in Kb.
    • Temperature (°C): The temperature of the device in degrees Celsius.

    6. Port Packet Metrics (8 attributes)

    • Packet In and Out Counter: The number of packets of data that have entered and exited all the device's ports.
    • Broadcast Packet In and Out Counter: The number of broadcast packets that have entered and exited all the device's ports.
    • Multicast Packet In and Out Counter: The number of multicast packets that have entered and exited all the device's ports.
    • Packet Error In and Out Counter: The number of error packets that have entered and exited all the device's ports.

    Size and Format

    The dataset contains approximately 1,675,843 entries, with 49 attributes per entry. It is available in CSV format.

  16. d

    ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database

    • dataone.org
    • borealisdata.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 28, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2023). ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/ESWWF6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1975 - Jan 1, 2020
    Description

    The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database contains time series data for the years 1960, 1965, 1970 and annually from 1975 to 2020 for more than 180 telecommunication/ICT statistics covering fixed-telephone networks, mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions, quality of service, Internet (including fixed- and mobile-broadband subscription data), traffic, staff, prices, revenue, investment and statistics on ICT access and use by households and individuals. Selected demographic, macroeconomic and broadcasting statistics are also included. Data are available for over 200 economies. However, it should be noted that since ITU relies primarily on official economy data, availability of data for the different indicators and years varies. Notes explaining data exceptions are also included. The data are collected from an annual questionnaire sent to official economy contacts, usually the regulatory authority or the ministry in charge of telecommunication and ICT. Additional data are obtained from reports provided by telecommunication ministries, regulators and operators and from ITU staff reports. In some cases, estimates are made by ITU staff; these are noted in the database.

  17. Android Analytics Requests Network Traffic

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Nov 3, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Francesco Pagano (2021). Android Analytics Requests Network Traffic [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/x3no21/android-analytics-requests-network-traffic
    Explore at:
    zip(28855461 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2021
    Authors
    Francesco Pagano
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains a set of 265770 analytics requests obtained from the experimental campaign of the HideDroid research: HideDroid, which involved 4500 apps. The collection of all analytics requests is stored inside a .json file. The .json contains all requests inside the key "AnalyticsRequest" key; the value associated with this key is a json array. All elements of the "AnalyiticsRequest" array are indexes to app batches analyzed during the testing campaign, so they are in the form "first_app_index-last_app_index." Each of the latter keys is associated with a json array, containing all analytics requests extracted from the specific set o apps.
    All elements inside the last keys is a json object containing the followings keys: * id: id of the corresponding entry of the table, in which the request is stored * package_name: the package name of the app that generated the hostname * host: name of the host to which the request is delivered * time: timestamp that indicates the time in which the request is sent * byte_request: binary representation of the request * method: HTTP method used to send the request * path: path appended to the hostname * http_protocol: HTTP protocol version * header_json: a json object containing the set of all request headers associated to the request * body_offset: offset of the body with respect to the headers (which are put before the body). * body_string: the body of the request as a json object * body_without_special_char: body without special ascii characters

    Please use the following bibtex entry to cite our work: BibTex @misc{caputo2021cant, title={You can't always get what you want: towards user-controlled privacy on Android}, author={Davide Caputo and Francesco Pagano and Giovanni Bottino and Luca Verderame and Alessio Merlo}, year={2021}, eprint={2106.02483}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.CR} }

  18. Parking — Occupancy forecasting

    • researchdata.edu.au
    • data.qld.gov.au
    Updated Sep 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brisbane City Council (2024). Parking — Occupancy forecasting [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/parking-8212-occupancy-forecasting/3472473
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Queensland Governmenthttp://qld.gov.au/
    Authors
    Brisbane City Council
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset is available on Brisbane City Council’s open data website – data.brisbane.qld.gov.au. The site provides additional features for viewing and interacting with the data and for downloading the data in various formats.

    The Brisbane City Council parking occupancy forecasting data is provided to be accessed by third party web or app developers to develop tools to provide Brisbane residents and visitors with likely parking availability within a paid parking area.

    The parking occupancy forecasting data is compiled using advanced analytics and machine learning to estimate paid parking availability. The solution uses parking occupancy survey data, parking meter transaction data and other traffic and environmental data.

    This dataset is linked to the open data called Parking — Meter locations. The field called MOBILE\_ZONE is used to link the datasets. MOBILE\_ZONE is a seven\-digit mobile payment zone number that may include one or many parking meter numbers.

    Additional information on parking meters can be found on the Brisbane City Council website.

    The Brisbane City Council parking occupancy forecasting data includes parking data for all of Council’s parking meters. The data attributes used in this resource and their descriptions can be found in the Parking — Occupancy forecasting — metadata — CSV resource in this dataset.

    The Data and resources section of this dataset contains further information for this dataset.

  19. Data generation volume worldwide 2010-2029

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 19, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Data generation volume worldwide 2010-2029 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/871513/worldwide-data-created/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 19, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The total amount of data created, captured, copied, and consumed globally is forecast to increase rapidly. While it was estimated at ***** zettabytes in 2025, the forecast for 2029 stands at ***** zettabytes. Thus, global data generation will triple between 2025 and 2029. Data creation has been expanding continuously over the past decade. In 2020, the growth was higher than previously expected, caused by the increased demand due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as more people worked and learned from home and used home entertainment options more often.

  20. w

    Road Traffic Crashes 2012-2023 - Kenya

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    Updated May 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sveta Milusheva (2024). Road Traffic Crashes 2012-2023 - Kenya [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6249
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Sveta Milusheva
    Time period covered
    2012 - 2023
    Area covered
    Kenya
    Description

    Abstract

    This project geolocated the location of road traffic crashes based on crowdsourced reports of crashes from Ma3Route, a mobile/web/SMS platform that crowdsources transport data

    Geographic coverage

    Primarily Nairobi, Kenya

    Analysis unit

    Road traffic crashes

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    All tweets from @Ma3Route from August 2012 to July 2023

    Mode of data collection

    Internet [int]

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
0913ktg (2022). 5G Traffic Datasets [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kimdaegyeom/5g-traffic-datasets
Organization logo

5G Traffic Datasets

Explore at:
CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
Dataset updated
Oct 28, 2022
Dataset provided by
Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
Authors
0913ktg
Description

Representative applications that can directly collect 5G da-tasets from mobile terminals without using specialized equipment include G-NetTrack Pro and PCAPdroid. The for-mer allows for the monitoring and logging of the header and payload information of the medium access control (MAC) frame passing through the 5G air interface. The latter is an open-source network capture and monitoring tool that works without root privileges, analyzing connections made by ap-plications installed on the user's mobile device. The latter can also dump mobile traffic to PCAP (also known as libpcap) and send it to the well-known Wireshark for further analysis. We created 5G datasets by measuring 5G traffic directly from a major mobile operator in South Korea. The model name of the mobile terminal used for traffic measurement is the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and it was equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X50 5G modem. The packet sniffer software used for traffic measurement, PCAPdroid, was in-stalled in the terminal through Google play. Traffic was measured sequentially per application on two stationary ter-minals (only one terminal was used for non-interactive ser-vices) with no background traffic. The collected dataset is representative resource-intensive video traffic that has the greatest impact on 5G network planning and provisioning, and background traffic was not mixed to measure the unique characteristics of each type of traffic. The video streaming dataset includes data directly meas-ured while watching Netflix and Amazon Prime, which are representative over-the-top (OTT) services, on mobile devic-es. The live streaming dataset was measured while watching YouTube Live and South Korea's representative live broad-casts (Naver NOW and Afreeca TV). Video conferencing data were measured by holding an actual meeting on the widely used Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Meet platform. Two types of metaverse traffic were acquired: Zepeto and Roblox. Zepeto traffic was collected while staying in the 'camping world' for 15 hours. Roblox traffic was collected over 25 hours of playing the 'Collect All Pets' game using an auto clicker. We collected two types of mobile network gaming traffic. The first was cloud gaming, an online game setup that runs video games on remote servers and streams them direct-ly to the user's device. The second was a traditional mobile game connected to the Internet. The dataset was collected from May to October 2022, is a massive 328 hours in total, and is provided in the csv file format. The dataset we collected is a timestamp-mapped time series dataset with packet header information, and traffic analysis by application is possible because it includes source and destination addresses. To make it more usable as a traffic source model, Section III describes how to use it as a training dataset for the traffic simulator platform's source generator.

A 5G traffic dataset measured by PCAPdroid has been re-leased and can be used as a training dataset for various ML models. However, since the size of this dataset is very large, it is inconvenient to handle, and additional data preprocessing is required to use it for its intended purpose.

This data set can be used to learn GANs, time-series forcasting deep learning models.

Our implementation is given on GitHub. https://github.com/0913ktg/5G-Traffic-Generator

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu