Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
CDS input file for Monocle3 trajectory analysis tutorial. Created from AnnData object from the upstream pre-processing.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Input datasets for the trajectory analysis tutorial from the case study series.
https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/transcriptomics/
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Summary: Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate innate and adaptive immunity, by translating the sensing of distinct danger signals into the induction of different effector lymphocyte responses, to induce different defense mechanisms suited to face distinct types of threats. Hence, DCs are very plastic, which results from two key characteristics. First, DCs encompass distinct cell types specialized in different functions. Second, each DC type can undergo different activation states, fine-tuning its functions depending on its tissue microenvironment and the pathophysiological context, by adapting the output signals it delivers to the input signals it receives. Hence, to better understand DC biology and harness it in the clinic, we must determine which combinations of DC types and activation states mediate which functions, and how.
To decipher the nature, functions and regulation of DC types and their physiological activation states, one of the methods that can be harnessed most successfully is ex vivo single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). However, for new users of this approach, determining which analytics strategy and computational tools to choose can be quite challenging, considering the rapid evolution and broad burgeoning of the field. In addition, awareness must be raised on the need for specific, robust and tractable strategies to annotate cells for cell type identity and activation states. It is also important to emphasize the necessity of examining whether similar cell activation trajectories are inferred by using different, complementary methods. In this chapter, we take these issues into account for providing a pipeline for scRNAseq analysis and illustrating it with a tutorial reanalyzing a public dataset of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from the lungs of naïve or tumor-bearing mice. We describe this pipeline step-by-step, including data quality controls, dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, cell cluster annotation, inference of the cell activation trajectories and investigation of the underpinning molecular regulation. It is accompanied with a more complete tutorial on Github. We anticipate that this method will be helpful for both wet lab and bioinformatics researchers interested in harnessing scRNAseq data for deciphering the biology of DCs or other cell types, and that it will contribute to establishing high standards in the field.
Data:
1. negative_cDC1_relative_signatures.csv : Negative signatures for performing Connectivity Map (cMAP) Analysis
2. positive_cDC1_relative_signatures.csv : Positive signatures for performing Connectivity Map (cMAP) Analysis
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
CDS input file for Monocle3 trajectory analysis tutorial. Created from AnnData object from the upstream pre-processing.