In the measured time period, September 2024 saw the highest figures for online traffic to the C2C fashion marketplace depop.com. According to the data, desktop and mobile visits to depop.com reached **** million visits that month.

In the measured time period, January 2025 saw the highest figures for online classifieds site craigslist.org. According to the data, desktop and mobile visits to depop.com reached 142.7 million visits that month.

Daily utilization metrics for data.lacity.org and geohub.lacity.org. Updated monthly

amazon.com is ranked #5 in US with 2.56B Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Between December 2022 and January 2024, ******** was the online learning platform reporting the highest traffic, with a peak of *** million visits to its websites in December 2023. ******** ranked second, with the platform reaching a peak of ** million visits in the examined period. The website ******* (which stands for technology, entertainment, design) saw a peak of over ** million visits in March 2023.

youtube.com is ranked #1 in KR with 42.83B Traffic. Categories: Newspapers, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

reddit.com is ranked #3 in US with 4.35B Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

In the measured time period, May 2025 saw the highest figures for online traffic to the D2C sportswear retailer gymshark.com. According to the data, desktop and mobile visits to gymshark.com reached *****million visits that month.

medium.com is ranked #261 in US with 102.92M Traffic. Categories: Computer Software and Development, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

faire.com is ranked #3625 in US with 4.21M Traffic. Categories: Retail. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

openai.com is ranked #60 in US with 1.12B Traffic. Categories: AI, Computer Software and Development, Wellness. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

chatgpt.com is ranked #12 in US with 4.61B Traffic. Categories: AI. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Digitec.ch recorded over ************ visitors to its Swiss online store in March 2025. This was a traffic increase of ******* visits from the month before.

spoonflower.com is ranked #7914 in US with 1.61M Traffic. Categories: Retail. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

target.com is ranked #55 in US with 168.82M Traffic. Categories: Retail, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

x.com is ranked #10 in US with 3.57B Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

perplexity.ai is ranked #421 in US with 141.32M Traffic. Categories: AI. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union". Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content? To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic. In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained. To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market. It includes:

Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures

Please refer to the original data article for further data description: Jan Luxemburk et al. CESNET-QUIC22: A large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines, Data in Brief, 2023, 108888, ISSN 2352-3409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888. We recommend using the CESNET DataZoo python library, which facilitates the work with large network traffic datasets. More information about the DataZoo project can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo. The QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol has the potential to replace TLS over TCP, which is the standard choice for reliable and secure Internet communication. Due to its design that makes the inspection of QUIC handshakes challenging and its usage in HTTP/3, there is an increasing demand for research in QUIC traffic analysis. This dataset contains one month of QUIC traffic collected in an ISP backbone network, which connects 500 large institutions and serves around half a million people. The data are delivered as enriched flows that can be useful for various network monitoring tasks. The provided server names and packet-level information allow research in the encrypted traffic classification area. Moreover, included QUIC versions and user agents (smartphone, web browser, and operating system identifiers) provide information for large-scale QUIC deployment studies. Data capture The data was captured in the flow monitoring infrastructure of the CESNET2 network. The capturing was done for four weeks between 31.10.2022 and 27.11.2022. The following list provides per-week flow count, capture period, and uncompressed size:

W-2022-44

Uncompressed Size: 19 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 6.11.2022 Number of flows: 32.6M W-2022-45

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 7.11.2022 - 13.11.2022 Number of flows: 42.6M W-2022-46

Uncompressed Size: 20 GB Capture Period: 14.11.2022 - 20.11.2022 Number of flows: 33.7M W-2022-47

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 21.11.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 44.1M CESNET-QUIC22

Uncompressed Size: 89 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 153M

Data description The dataset consists of network flows describing encrypted QUIC communications. Flows were created using ipfixprobe flow exporter and are extended with packet metadata sequences, packet histograms, and with fields extracted from the QUIC Initial Packet, which is the first packet of the QUIC connection handshake. The extracted handshake fields are the Server Name Indication (SNI) domain, the used version of the QUIC protocol, and the user agent string that is available in a subset of QUIC communications. Packet Sequences Flows in the dataset are extended with sequences of packet sizes, directions, and inter-packet times. For the packet sizes, we consider payload size after transport headers (UDP headers for the QUIC case). Packet directions are encoded as ±1, +1 meaning a packet sent from client to server, and -1 a packet from server to client. Inter-packet times depend on the location of communicating hosts, their distance, and on the network conditions on the path. However, it is still possible to extract relevant information that correlates with user interactions and, for example, with the time required for an API/server/database to process the received data and generate the response to be sent in the next packet. Packet metadata sequences have a length of 30, which is the default setting of the used flow exporter. We also derive three fields from each packet sequence: its length, time duration, and the number of roundtrips. The roundtrips are counted as the number of changes in the communication direction (from packet directions data); in other words, each client request and server response pair counts as one roundtrip. Flow statistics Flows also include standard flow statistics, which represent aggregated information about the entire bidirectional flow. The fields are: the number of transmitted bytes and packets in both directions, the duration of flow, and packet histograms. Packet histograms include binned counts of packet sizes and inter-packet times of the entire flow in both directions (more information in the PHISTS plugin documentation There are eight bins with a logarithmic scale; the intervals are 0-15, 16-31, 32-63, 64-127, 128-255, 256-511, 512-1024, >1024 [ms or B]. The units are milliseconds for inter-packet times and bytes for packet sizes. Moreover, each flow has its end reason - either it was idle, reached the active timeout, or ended due to other reasons. This corresponds with the official IANA IPFIX-specified values. The FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER field represents the forced end and lack of resources reasons. The end of flow detected reason is not considered because it is not relevant for UDP connections. Dataset structure The dataset flows are delivered in compressed CSV files. CSV files contain one flow per row; data columns are summarized in the provided list below. For each flow data file, there is a JSON file with the number of saved and seen (before sampling) flows per service and total counts of all received (observed on the CESNET2 network), service (belonging to one of the dataset's services), and saved (provided in the dataset) flows. There is also the stats-week.json file aggregating flow counts of a whole week and the stats-dataset.json file aggregating flow counts for the entire dataset. Flow counts before sampling can be used to compute sampling ratios of individual services and to resample the dataset back to the original service distribution. Moreover, various dataset statistics, such as feature distributions and value counts of QUIC versions and user agents, are provided in the dataset-statistics folder. The mapping between services and service providers is provided in the servicemap.csv file, which also includes SNI domains used for ground truth labeling. The following list describes flow data fields in CSV files:

ID: Unique identifier SRC_IP: Source IP address DST_IP: Destination IP address DST_ASN: Destination Autonomous System number SRC_PORT: Source port DST_PORT: Destination port PROTOCOL: Transport protocol QUIC_VERSION QUIC: protocol version QUIC_SNI: Server Name Indication domain QUIC_USER_AGENT: User agent string, if available in the QUIC Initial Packet TIME_FIRST: Timestamp of the first packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff TIME_LAST: Timestamp of the last packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff DURATION: Duration of the flow in seconds BYTES: Number of transmitted bytes from client to server BYTES_REV: Number of transmitted bytes from server to client PACKETS: Number of packets transmitted from client to server PACKETS_REV: Number of packets transmitted from server to client PPI: Packet metadata sequence in the format: [[inter-packet times], [packet directions], [packet sizes]] PPI_LEN: Number of packets in the PPI sequence PPI_DURATION: Duration of the PPI sequence in seconds PPI_ROUNDTRIPS: Number of roundtrips in the PPI sequence PHIST_SRC_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from client to server PHIST_DST_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from server to client PHIST_SRC_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from client to server PHIST_DST_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from server to client APP: Web service label CATEGORY: Service category FLOW_ENDREASON_IDLE: Flow was terminated because it was idle FLOW_ENDREASON_ACTIVE: Flow was terminated because it reached the active timeout FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER: Flow was terminated for other reasons

Link to other CESNET datasets

https://www.liberouter.org/technology-v2/tools-services-datasets/datasets/ https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo Please cite the original data article:

@article{CESNETQUIC22, author = {Jan Luxemburk and Karel Hynek and Tomáš Čejka and Andrej Lukačovič and Pavel Šiška}, title = {CESNET-QUIC22: a large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines}, journal = {Data in Brief}, pages = {108888}, year = {2023}, issn = {2352-3409}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923000069} }

The statistic shows estimated internet data traffic per month in the United States from 2018 to 2023. In 2018, total internet data traffic was estimated to amount to 33.45 million exabytes per month.