3 datasets found
  1. Data from: A new species of logperch endemic to Tennessee (Percidae:...

    • search.datacite.org
    • datadryad.org
    Updated 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Thomas J. Near; Jeffrey W. Simmons; Jon Michael Mollish; Maria A. Correa; Edgar Benavides; Richard C. Harrington; Benjamin P. Keck (2018). Data from: A new species of logperch endemic to Tennessee (Percidae: Etheostomatinae: Percina) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rm607
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    2018
    Dataset provided by
    DataCitehttps://www.datacite.org/
    Dryad
    Authors
    Thomas J. Near; Jeffrey W. Simmons; Jon Michael Mollish; Maria A. Correa; Edgar Benavides; Richard C. Harrington; Benjamin P. Keck
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Percina apina, the Tennessee Logperch, is described as a new species endemic to Tennessee and distributed in the Duck River system and Whiteoak Creek. The earliest collection records for Percina apina date to 1971 and the species was identified as Percina burtoni, the Blotchside Logperch. A phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) published in 2006 showed that populations identified as Percina burtoni in the Duck River system and Whiteoak Creek were a new and undescribed species. In this study, we test the hypothesis that Percina burtoni is composed of multiple species through analyses of mtDNA, nuclear genetic variation, and traditional meristic trait morphology. Our analyses of morphological divergence, nuclear genotypes, mtDNA gene trees, and comparisons with other sister species pairs of logperches confirm the distinctiveness of Percina apina. Morphologically, Percina apina is distinguished from Percina burtoni through higher average numbers of lateral line scales (93.1 versus 89.9); pored lateral line scales (91.6 versus 88.8); rows of transverse scales (38.1 versus 33.6); and scales around the caudal peduncle (36.2 versus 33.5). The two species also differ in patterns of pigmentation; the lateral blotches in Percina apina are typically wider than high, whereas the blotches tend to be higher than wide in Percina burtoni. We recommend that future species descriptions of North American freshwater fishes leverage available genetic resources and include molecular phylogenetic assessments in analyses of taxon distinctiveness. In addition, we advocate the deposition of morphological data used in species descriptions to online data repositories to ensure that other researchers are able to evaluate and modify hypotheses of species delimitations.

  2. c

    Research data supporting "Image-based analyses from an online repository...

    • repository.cam.ac.uk
    bin, txt
    Updated Sep 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wilson, Oscar; Pashkevich, Michael; Rookmaaker, Kees; Turner, Edgar (2022). Research data supporting "Image-based analyses from an online repository provide rich information on long-term changes in morphology and human perceptions of rhinos" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.88300
    Explore at:
    txt(4030 bytes), bin(119531 bytes), bin(106836 bytes), bin(8105 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    University of Cambridge
    Apollo
    Authors
    Wilson, Oscar; Pashkevich, Michael; Rookmaaker, Kees; Turner, Edgar
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These three data tables contain the raw data used for the publication "Image-based analyses from an online repository provide rich information on long-term changes in morphology and human perceptions of rhinos". Photos.master.sheet.csv contains the complete list of photographs analysed for the human-rhino interaction analyses. Art.master.sheet.csv contains the complete list of non-photographed images analysed for the human-rhino interaction analyses. RhinoMeasurements.csv contains the raw measurements (taken using ImageJ) for morphology from photographs of rhinos used to assess how morphology has changed over time

  3. Supplementary material 2 from: Monckton SK (2016) A revision of Chilicola...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jan 21, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Spencer K. Monckton; Spencer K. Monckton (2020). Supplementary material 2 from: Monckton SK (2016) A revision of Chilicola (Heteroediscelis), a subgenus of xeromelissine bees (Hymenoptera, Colletidae) endemic to Chile: taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography, with descriptions of eight new species. ZooKeys 591: 1-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.591.7731 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.591.7731.suppl2
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 21, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Spencer K. Monckton; Spencer K. Monckton
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Material Studied : Explanation note: Specimen data for 1316 specimens, including localities, geographic coordinates, and depositories.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Thomas J. Near; Jeffrey W. Simmons; Jon Michael Mollish; Maria A. Correa; Edgar Benavides; Richard C. Harrington; Benjamin P. Keck (2018). Data from: A new species of logperch endemic to Tennessee (Percidae: Etheostomatinae: Percina) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rm607
Organization logo

Data from: A new species of logperch endemic to Tennessee (Percidae: Etheostomatinae: Percina)

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
2018
Dataset provided by
DataCitehttps://www.datacite.org/
Dryad
Authors
Thomas J. Near; Jeffrey W. Simmons; Jon Michael Mollish; Maria A. Correa; Edgar Benavides; Richard C. Harrington; Benjamin P. Keck
License

CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Percina apina, the Tennessee Logperch, is described as a new species endemic to Tennessee and distributed in the Duck River system and Whiteoak Creek. The earliest collection records for Percina apina date to 1971 and the species was identified as Percina burtoni, the Blotchside Logperch. A phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) published in 2006 showed that populations identified as Percina burtoni in the Duck River system and Whiteoak Creek were a new and undescribed species. In this study, we test the hypothesis that Percina burtoni is composed of multiple species through analyses of mtDNA, nuclear genetic variation, and traditional meristic trait morphology. Our analyses of morphological divergence, nuclear genotypes, mtDNA gene trees, and comparisons with other sister species pairs of logperches confirm the distinctiveness of Percina apina. Morphologically, Percina apina is distinguished from Percina burtoni through higher average numbers of lateral line scales (93.1 versus 89.9); pored lateral line scales (91.6 versus 88.8); rows of transverse scales (38.1 versus 33.6); and scales around the caudal peduncle (36.2 versus 33.5). The two species also differ in patterns of pigmentation; the lateral blotches in Percina apina are typically wider than high, whereas the blotches tend to be higher than wide in Percina burtoni. We recommend that future species descriptions of North American freshwater fishes leverage available genetic resources and include molecular phylogenetic assessments in analyses of taxon distinctiveness. In addition, we advocate the deposition of morphological data used in species descriptions to online data repositories to ensure that other researchers are able to evaluate and modify hypotheses of species delimitations.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu