In 2021, the death rate for leukemia among youth in the United States aged 0 to 19 years was .48 per 100,000 youth. This was a decrease from the death rate of 0.9 per 100,000 recorded in the year 2001. This statistic shows the cancer death rates for the three most common types of cancer among youth aged 0 to 19 years in the United States in 2001, 2011, and 2021.

In 2022, there were an estimated 2.48 million new cases of trachea, bronchus, and lung cancer worldwide. Breast cancer was the second most common cancer type at that time with around 2.3 million new cases worldwide.

Number of new cancer cases

Cancer can be caused by internal factors like genetics and mutations, as well as external factors such as smoking and radiation. It occurs in the presence of uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. However, many cancer cases could be prevented, for example, by omitting cigarette usage and heavy alcohol consumption. Risk of developing cancer tends to increase with age and is most common in older adults. Nevertheless, cancer can develop in individuals of any age. Cancer can be treated through surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, among other methods.

In the United States, there will be an estimated two million new cancer cases and 611,720 deaths in 2024. Among U.S. men, prostate cancer and lung and bronchus cancers are the most common cancer types as of 2024, totaling an estimated 299,010 and 116,310 cases, respectively. In women, breast cancer and lung and bronchus cancer are the most common newly diagnosed types, totaling 310,720 and 118,270 cases, respectively.

Editor’s Choice

• Global Breast Cancer Market size is expected to be worth around USD 49.2 Bn by 2032 from USD 19.8 Bn in 2022, growing at a CAGR of 9.8% during the forecast period from 2022 to 2032.
• Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. In 2020, there were about 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer diagnosed globally.
• Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. In 2020, it was responsible for approximately 685,000 deaths worldwide.
• The survival rate of breast cancer has improved over the years. In the United States, the overall five-year survival rate of breast cancer is around 90%.
• The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms starting at age 40 for women at average risk.
• Although rare, breast cancer also occurs in men. Less than 1% of breast cancer cases are diagnosed in males.

(Source: WHO, American Cancer Society)

BackgroundThe success of the “war on cancer” initiated in 1971 continues to be debated, with trends in cancer mortality variably presented as evidence of progress or failure. We examined temporal trends in death rates from all-cancer and the 19 most common cancers in the United States from 1970–2006.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe analyzed trends in age-standardized death rates (per 100,000) for all cancers combined, the four most common cancers, and 15 other sites from 1970–2006 in the United States using joinpoint regression model. The age-standardized death rate for all-cancers combined in men increased from 249.3 in 1970 to 279.8 in 1990, and then decreased to 221.1 in 2006, yielding a net decline of 21% and 11% from the 1990 and 1970 rates, respectively. Similarly, the all-cancer death rate in women increased from 163.0 in 1970 to 175.3 in 1991 and then decreased to 153.7 in 2006, a net decline of 12% and 6% from the 1991 and 1970 rates, respectively. These decreases since 1990/91 translate to preventing of 561,400 cancer deaths in men and 205,700 deaths in women. The decrease in death rates from all-cancers involved all ages and racial/ethnic groups. Death rates decreased for 15 of the 19 cancer sites, including the four major cancers, with lung, colorectum and prostate cancers in men and breast and colorectum cancers in women.Conclusions/SignificanceProgress in reducing cancer death rates is evident whether measured against baseline rates in 1970 or in 1990. The downturn in cancer death rates since 1990 result mostly from reductions in tobacco use, increased screening allowing early detection of several cancers, and modest to large improvements in treatment for specific cancers. Continued and increased investment in cancer prevention and control, access to high quality health care, and research could accelerate this progress.

It was estimated that in 2025 around ******* men in the United States would develop prostate cancer. This statistic depicts the estimated number of new cancer cases among men in the U.S. in 2009 and 2025, by cancer type.

Relative survival for 10 most common cancer sitesa by metropolitan and non-metropolitan statusb- United States, 2007–2016c.

In 2022, female breast cancer was the type of alcohol-associated cancer with the highest incidence in the United States, with a rate of nearly 138 per 100,000 people. This graph shows the rate of alcohol-related cancers per 100,000 people in the United States in 2022, by cancer type.

IntroductionSociodemographic disparities in genitourinary cancer-related mortality have been insufficiently studied, particularly across multiple cancer types. This study aimed to investigate gender, racial, and geographic disparities in mortality rates for the most common genitourinary cancers in the United States.MethodsMortality data for prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database between 1999 and 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were analyzed by year, gender, race, urban–rural status, and geographic region using a significance level of p < 0.05.ResultsOverall, AAMRs for prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer declined significantly, while testicular cancer-related mortality remained stable. Bladder and kidney cancer AAMRs were 3–4 times higher in males than females. Prostate cancer mortality was highest in black individuals/African Americans and began increasing after 2015. Bladder cancer mortality decreased significantly in White individuals, Black individuals, African Americans, and Asians/Pacific Islanders but remained stable in American Indian/Alaska Natives. Kidney cancer-related mortality was highest in White individuals but declined significantly in other races. Testicular cancer mortality increased significantly in White individuals but remained stable in Black individuals and African Americans. Genitourinary cancer mortality decreased in metropolitan areas but either increased (bladder and testicular cancer) or remained stable (kidney cancer) in non-metropolitan areas. Prostate and kidney cancer mortality was highest in the Midwest, bladder cancer in the South, and testicular cancer in the West.DiscussionSignificant sociodemographic disparities exist in the mortality trends of genitourinary cancers in the United States. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research to address these disparities and improve outcomes for all populations affected by genitourinary cancers.

Introduction

Breast Cancer Statistics: Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent and concerning health challenges, mostly among women. It is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in the United States. The impact of breast cancer is significant, with millions of new cases diagnosed each year and hundreds of thousands of deaths attributed to the disease.

This article will provide critical insights into the incidence, survival rates, mortality, and disparities across different demographics, including age, race, and ethnicity. Understanding the latest statistics on breast cancer is crucial for driving progress in reducing the incidence and mortality rates, improving survival outcomes, and ultimately, finding a cure.

Cancer was responsible for around *** deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2023. The death rate for cancer has steadily decreased since the 1990’s, but cancer still remains the second leading cause of death in the United States. The deadliest type of cancer for both men and women is cancer of the lung and bronchus which will account for an estimated ****** deaths among men alone in 2025. Probability of surviving Survival rates for cancer vary significantly depending on the type of cancer. The cancers with the highest rates of survival include cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and testis, with five-year survival rates as high as ** percent for thyroid cancer. The cancers with the lowest five-year survival rates include cancers of the pancreas, liver, and esophagus. Risk factors It is difficult to determine why one person develops cancer while another does not, but certain risk factors have been shown to increase a person’s chance of developing cancer. For example, cigarette smoking has been proven to increase the risk of developing various cancers. In fact, around ** percent of cancers of the lung, bronchus and trachea among adults aged 30 years and older can be attributed to cigarette smoking. Other modifiable risk factors for cancer include being obese, drinking alcohol, and sun exposure.

BackgroundCervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in the United States have substantially declined over recent decades, primarily driven by reductions in squamous cell carcinoma cases. However, the trend in recent years remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality, stratified by demographic and tumor characteristics from 1975 to 2018.MethodsThe age-adjusted incidence, incidence-based mortality, and relative survival of cervical cancer were calculated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-9 database. Trend analyses with annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC) calculations were performed using Joinpoint Regression Software (Version 4.9.1.0, National Cancer Institute).ResultsDuring 1975–2018, 49,658 cervical cancer cases were diagnosed, with 17,099 recorded deaths occurring between 1995 and 2018. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type, with 34,169 cases and 11,859 deaths. Over the study period, the cervical cancer incidence rate decreased by an average of 1.9% (95% CI: −2.3% to −1.6%) per year, with the APCs decreased in recent years (−0.5% [95% CI: −1.1 to 0.1%] in 2006–2018). Squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends closely paralleled overall cervical cancer patterns, but the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in the distant stage increased significantly (1.1% [95% CI: 0.4 to 1.8%] in 1990–2018). From 1995 to 2018, the overall cervical cancer mortality rate decreased by 1.0% (95% CI: −1.2% to −0.8%) per year. But for distant-stage squamous cell carcinoma, the mortality rate increased by 1.2% (95% CI: 0.3 to 2.1%) per year.ConclusionFor cervical cancer cases diagnosed in the United States from 1975 to 2018, the overall incidence and mortality rates decreased significantly. However, there was an increase in the incidence and mortality of advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma. These epidemiological patterns offer critical insights for refining cervical cancer screening protocols and developing targeted interventions for advanced-stage cases.

Snapshot img

Gynecological Cancers Therapeutics Market Size 2024-2028

The gynecological cancers therapeutics market size is forecast to increase by USD 19.15 billion at a CAGR of 15.83% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing incidence of gynecological cancers. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 389,000 new cases and 129,000 deaths occurred in 2020. This trend is expected to continue, driven by factors such as aging populations, rising awareness, and improved diagnostic methods. Another key driver in the market is the emergence of novel therapies. The development of targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and gene therapies is providing new treatment options for patients, leading to improved outcomes and increased survival rates. However, the high cost of these advanced therapies poses a significant challenge for both patients and healthcare systems.
Affordability remains a critical concern, particularly in developing countries where access to healthcare is limited. In conclusion, the market is experiencing robust growth due to the rising incidence of gynecological cancers and the emergence of innovative therapies. However, the high cost of treatment remains a significant challenge that must be addressed to ensure accessibility and affordability for patients. Companies seeking to capitalize on market opportunities and navigate challenges effectively should focus on developing cost-effective treatment options while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

What will be the Size of the Gynecological Cancers Therapeutics Market during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The market is characterized by continuous evolution and dynamic market activities. genetic testing plays a pivotal role in identifying the genetic predisposition to various gynecological cancers, driving research funding towards precision medicine and personalized treatment plans. Patient support organizations are increasingly focusing on improving quality of life for patients undergoing cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cancer screening initiatives, including Molecular Diagnostics, are essential for early detection and prevention of gynecological cancers such as uterine, ovarian, cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. Clinical trials and drug development are ongoing, with a focus on targeted therapy and hormonal treatments. Healthcare policy and regulatory frameworks are evolving to accommodate the needs of women's reproductive health, with a growing emphasis on patient care and patient advocacy.
Machine learning and Data Analytics are transforming cancer diagnosis and treatment, enabling healthcare providers to deliver more accurate and effective care. Drug discovery and approval processes are underway for various gynecological cancers, with a focus on improving cancer survival rates and reducing recurrence. Digital health technologies, including telemedicine and remote monitoring, are enhancing patient care and access to healthcare services. The landscape of gynecological cancers therapeutics is ever-changing, with ongoing research and innovation in areas such as drug development, cancer prevention, and precision oncology. The future holds great promise for improving patient outcomes and advancing women's health.

How is this Gynecological Cancers Therapeutics Industry segmented?

The gynecological cancers therapeutics industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Type

  Uterine cancer
  Ovarian cancer
  Cervical cancer
  Others


Modality

  Chemotherapy
  Targeted therapy
  Hormonal therapy


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The uterine cancer segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Uterine cancer, specifically endometrial cancer, arises from the inner lining of the uterus and is the fourth most common cancer among women in the US, with approximately 65,950 new cases expected to be diagnosed in 2022, according to the American Cancer Society. Genetic testing plays a crucial role in identifying the underlying causes and potential risk factors for uterine cancer. Research funding from various organizations and healthcare policy initiatives drives advancements in molecular diagnostics and clinical trials for early cancer detection and precision medicine. Patient support groups and advocacy organizations provide essential resources for patients, ensuring quality of life during cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Drug development and approval processes prioritize targeted therapy and hormonal treatments for uterine cancer, while machine learning and artificial intelligence f

Population based cancer incidence rates were abstracted from National Cancer Institute, State Cancer Profiles for all available counties in the United States for which data were available. This is a national county-level database of cancer data that are collected by state public health surveillance systems. All-site cancer is defined as any type of cancer that is captured in the state registry data, though non-melanoma skin cancer is not included. All-site age-adjusted cancer incidence rates were abstracted separately for males and females. County-level annual age-adjusted all-site cancer incidence rates for years 2006–2010 were available for 2687 of 3142 (85.5%) counties in the U.S. Counties for which there are fewer than 16 reported cases in a specific area-sex-race category are suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates; this accounted for 14 counties in our study. Two states, Kansas and Virginia, do not provide data because of state legislation and regulations which prohibit the release of county level data to outside entities. Data from Michigan does not include cases diagnosed in other states because data exchange agreements prohibit the release of data to third parties. Finally, state data is not available for three states, Minnesota, Ohio, and Washington. The age-adjusted average annual incidence rate for all counties was 453.7 per 100,000 persons. We selected 2006–2010 as it is subsequent in time to the EQI exposure data which was constructed to represent the years 2000–2005. We also gathered data for the three leading causes of cancer for males (lung, prostate, and colorectal) and females (lung, breast, and colorectal). The EQI was used as an exposure metric as an indicator of cumulative environmental exposures at the county-level representing the period 2000 to 2005. A complete description of the datasets used in the EQI are provided in Lobdell et al. and methods used for index construction are described by Messer et al. The EQI was developed for the period 2000– 2005 because it was the time period for which the most recent data were available when index construction was initiated. The EQI includes variables representing each of the environmental domains. The air domain includes 87 variables representing criteria and hazardous air pollutants. The water domain includes 80 variables representing overall water quality, general water contamination, recreational water quality, drinking water quality, atmospheric deposition, drought, and chemical contamination. The land domain includes 26 variables representing agriculture, pesticides, contaminants, facilities, and radon. The built domain includes 14 variables representing roads, highway/road safety, public transit behavior, business environment, and subsidized housing environment. The sociodemographic environment includes 12 variables representing socioeconomics and crime. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: Human health data are not available publicly. EQI data are available at: https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/ORD/NHEERL/EQI. Format: Data are stored as csv files. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Jagai, J., L. Messer, K. Rappazzo , C. Gray, S. Grabich , and D. Lobdell. County-level environmental quality and associations with cancer incidence#. Cancer. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, New York, NY, USA, 123(15): 2901-2908, (2017).

Prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cancers are major urogenital cancers. Of which, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed and second leading cause of cancer death for men in the United States. For urogenital cancers, urine is considered as proximate body fluid to the tumor site for developing non-invasiveness tests. However, the specific molecular signatures from different urogenital cancers are needed to relate changes in urine to various cancer detections. Herein, we utilized a previously published C4-Tip and C18/MAX-Tip workflow for enrichment of glycopeptides from urine samples and evaluated urinary glycopeptides for its cancer specificity. We analyzed 66 urine samples from bladder cancer (n = 27), prostate cancer (n = 4), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC, n = 3), and benign plastic hyperplasia (BPH, n = 32) and then compared them with a previous publication that reported glycopeptides associated with aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8). We further demonstrated the cancer specificity of the glycopeptides associated with aggressive prostate cancer. In this study, a total of 33 glycopeptides were identified to be specifically differentially expressed in prostate cancer compared to other urogenital cancer types as well as BPH urines. By cross-comparison with our previous urinary glycoproteomic dataset for aggressive prostate cancer, we reported a total of four glycopeptides from glycoproteins DSC2, MGAM, PIK3IP1, and CD55, commonly identified to be prostate cancer-specific. Together, these results deepen our understanding of the urinary glycoproteins associated with urogenital cancer types and expand our knowledge of the cancer specificity of urinary glycoproteins among urogenital cancer progression.

The rate of liver cancer diagnoses in the United States increases with age. As of 2021, those aged 75 to 79 years had the highest rates of liver cancer. Risk factors for liver cancer include smoking, drinking alcohol, being overweight or obese, and having diabetes. Who is most likely to get liver cancer? Liver cancer in the United States is much more common among men than women. In 2021, there were 12.3 new liver cancer diagnoses among men per 100,000 population, compared to just five new diagnoses per 100,000 women. Concerning race and ethnicity, non-Hispanic American Indians and Alaska Natives and Hispanic have the highest rates of new liver cancer diagnoses. The five-year survival rate for liver cancer in the United States is around 22 percent, however, this rate is much higher among non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islanders than other races and ethnicities. Non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islanders have a 33 percent chance of surviving the next five years after a liver cancer diagnosis. Deaths from liver cancer In 2020, there were an estimated 20,262 deaths in the United States due to liver cancer. However, the death rate for liver cancer has decreased over the past few years. In the period 1999 to 2020, the death rate for liver cancer reached a high of five deaths per 100,000 population in 2015 but dropped to 4.6 deaths per 100,000 population by 2020. It is estimated that in 2024, there will be over 19,000 liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer deaths among men in the United States and 10,700 such deaths among women.

Snapshot img

Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Market Size 2024-2028

The non-melanoma skin cancer market size is forecast to increase by USD 136.9 million at a CAGR of 4.5% between 2023 and 2028.

The non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing incidence of this type of cancer. NMSC is the most common form of cancer, with over three million cases diagnosed annually worldwide. The market is facing a challenge due to the lack of drugs in the pipeline for NMSC treatment. This trend is expected to continue, as current treatments such as surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery have limitations and may leave scars or require multiple procedures. Healthcare services are playing a critical role in addressing this issue by improving early detection, offering advanced treatment options, and providing patient support throughout the recovery process. Additionally, the aging population and rising awareness about cosmetic skin care are contributing to the market's growth. The market analysis report provides an in-depth analysis of these trends and growth factors, offering valuable insights for stakeholders In the healthcare industry.

What will be the Size of the Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market encompasses a range of conditions, including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. These forms of cancer are primarily caused by sun exposure, resulting in symptoms such as scaly surfaces, red patches, sores, moles, or warts. Treatment modalities include surgery, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy, topical therapies, cryosurgery, and electrodesiccation. Mohs surgery, a specialized form of surgery, is increasingly utilized for high-risk occurrences due to its ability to preserve healthy tissue.
Advanced treatments, such as Vismodegib, offer promising alternatives for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. The market is driven by the increasing prevalence of sun exposure-related injuries and the growing aging population. Despite advancements in treatment options, the risk of recurrence remains a significant concern, necessitating ongoing research and innovation.

How is this Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The non-melanoma skin cancer industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Type

  BCC
  SCC


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  Asia

    China
    Japan


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The bcc segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC), primarily comprised of Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), accounts for a significant portion of cancer occurrences worldwide. BCC, responsible for approximately 80% of NMSC, has seen an annual growth rate of 2% In the US and 5% in Europe. In the Asia Pacific region, Australia holds the highest incidence of BCC among individuals aged 70. Despite a low mortality rate of approximately 0.05%, BCCs can result in disfiguring body alterations. Surgical treatments, including Mohs surgery, cryosurgery, and electrodesiccation, are common interventions. Radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy, and topical therapies also serve as alternative treatment methods.

Get a glance at the Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The BCC segment was valued at USD 410.20 million in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

North America is estimated to contribute 29% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC), comprised primarily of Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), is a significant health concern In the US, accounting for approximately 35-45% of all cancers among Caucasians. NMSC is the most common cancer type In the US, with BCC being the most prevalent skin cancer subtype. Treatment modalities for NMSC include surgery, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy, topical therapies, cryosurgery, electrodesiccation, Mohs surgery, Vismodegib for advanced cases, and chemotherapy for metastasis. Risk factors for NMSC include sun exposure, sunburns, radiation exposure, inflammation, injury, and the presence of skin growths such as bumps, moles, red patches, sores, moles, warts, and recurrence.

Market Dynamics

Our researchers analyzed the data wit

Breast Cancer Treatment Market Overview

Breast cancer treatment providers employ various drugs to target the disease effectively. Chemotherapy agents like doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and docetaxel attack rapidly dividing cells and are often administered around surgery.

Hormone therapies, such as tamoxifen, and aromatase inhibitors, like anastrozole and letrozole, lower estrogen levels in hormone receptor-positive cancers.

Targeted therapies, including trastuzumab and palbociclib, focus on specific cancer markers, resulting in fewer side effects.

Immunotherapy, like pembrolizumab, enhances the immune response, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer.

Drug selection is based on cancer type, patient health, and treatment goals. Underscoring the importance of personalized therapy for improved outcomes.

Introduction

The Global Cancer Vaccine Market is projected to reach approximately USD 48.6 billion by 2033, rising from USD 10.2 billion in 2023. This expansion is expected to occur at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.9% from 2024 to 2033. Several key factors are contributing to this rapid growth. The rising global burden of cancer continues to drive demand for effective prevention strategies. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, with 90% of related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. This highlights the urgent need for accessible and preventive measures such as vaccines.

Technological advancements have significantly accelerated the cancer vaccine landscape. The success of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased research in mRNA-based cancer vaccines. These vaccines are designed to stimulate the immune system to identify and destroy cancer cells. In the United Kingdom, the Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad aims to deliver personalized mRNA cancer vaccines to over 10,000 patients by 2030. This initiative uses genomic sequencing technologies and existing vaccine infrastructure to support rapid development and implementation.

Governmental programs are also playing a crucial role in promoting vaccine research and distribution. In the United States, the Cancer Moonshot 2.0 initiative aims to reduce cancer mortality by 50% over the next 25 years. This includes funding for early detection technologies, equitable access to treatment, and faster development of innovative therapies. Similarly, in India, the launch of Cervavac, the country’s first indigenous HPV vaccine, marks a major step toward affordable cancer prevention. Priced between INR 300–400 per dose, Cervavac is now part of the national immunization program and targets the reduction of cervical cancer deaths.

Personalized medicine is further transforming the cancer vaccine market. Advances in genomic profiling have enabled the development of individualized cancer vaccines. These vaccines target specific mutations within a person’s tumor, allowing for more precise and effective treatment. Currently, several of these personalized vaccines are undergoing clinical trials, showing promising outcomes. This trend aligns with the growing focus on precision oncology, where treatments are tailored based on a patient’s genetic and molecular profile.

Lastly, efforts to close the global gap in vaccine access are gaining momentum. WHO reports indicate a major disparity in HPV vaccine coverage—only 41% of low-income countries have adopted it in their immunization schedules, compared to 83% of high-income countries. Global initiatives are now focusing on improving vaccine accessibility and affordability, particularly in under-resourced regions. This drive toward equity is essential for the broader success of global cancer prevention strategies.

US Tariff Impact on Cancer Vaccine Market

The U.S. government’s proposed tariffs on pharmaceutical imports are expected to significantly impact the cancer vaccine market. These changes may affect drug pricing, manufacturing stability, and research innovation. A proposed 25% tariff on pharmaceutical imports may increase cancer treatment costs. Some estimates suggest treatment costs could rise by as much as $10,000 for a 24-week course. Cancer vaccines that rely on imported ingredients or formulations would be especially affected. These cost hikes may limit patient access to new vaccines. Healthcare providers may also face pressure to adjust pricing structures. Such challenges could lead to reduced adoption of advanced therapeutic options in the U.S. market.

The U.S. depends on imports for over 70% of its active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). These APIs mostly come from China and India. If tariffs are enforced, the supply chain may face disruptions. Shortages in API supplies could delay production timelines. Manufacturers may struggle to meet demand or face increased production costs. This instability may affect the timely delivery of cancer vaccines. As a result, public health outcomes could be compromised if treatment access becomes inconsistent or unaffordable.

Higher operational costs from tariffs could reduce budgets for innovation. Pharmaceutical companies may be forced to shift R&D funding to manage tariffs. This may hinder the development of next-generation cancer vaccines, including mRNA-based platforms. To mitigate these risks, firms are taking strategic actions. For example, Roche plans to invest $50 billion in U.S. production. Such moves aim to localize manufacturing and avoid tariff-related costs. These strategies can support long-term market resilience and ensure cancer vaccine progress continues.

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are designed to serve as single summary measures that are easy to construct, condensing information from a large number of genetic variants associated with a disease. They have been used for stratification and prediction of disease risk. The primary focus of this paper is to demonstrate how we can combine PRS and electronic health records data to better understand the shared and unique genetic architecture and etiology of disease subtypes that may be both related and heterogeneous. PRS construction strategies often depend on the purpose of the study, the available data/summary estimates, and the underlying genetic architecture of a disease. We consider several choices for constructing a PRS using data obtained from various publicly-available sources including the UK Biobank and evaluate their abilities to predict not just the primary phenotype but also secondary phenotypes derived from electronic health records (EHR). This study was conducted using data from 30,702 unrelated, genotyped patients of recent European descent from the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI), a longitudinal biorepository effort within Michigan Medicine. We examine the three most common skin cancer subtypes in the USA: basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Using these PRS for various skin cancer subtypes, we conduct a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) within the MGI data to evaluate PRS associations with secondary traits. PheWAS results are then replicated using population-based UK Biobank data and compared across various PRS construction methods. We develop an accompanying visual catalog called PRSweb that provides detailed PheWAS results and allows users to directly compare different PRS construction methods.

Snapshot img

Bladder Cancer Market Size 2024-2028

The bladder cancer market size is forecast to increase by USD 2.45 billion at a CAGR of 11.4% between 2023 and 2028.

Bladder cancer is a significant health concern, with minimally invasive surgical procedures, such as robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic treatments, gaining popularity due to their benefits in reducing post-operative complications and recovery time.
Additionally, the market is witnessing advancements in non-invasive diagnostics, including liquid biopsy, which offers early detection and recurrence monitoring for advanced-stage bladder cancer patients. New drug approvals are driving market growth, while concerns over product recalls remain a challenge for companies. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of market trends, growth drivers, and challenges in the market.

What will be the Size of the Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

Bladder cancer is a type of urinary tract cancer that affects the tissues lining the inside of the bladder. This malignancy encompasses various subtypes, including urothelial carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and transitional cell carcinoma. In the United States, bladder cancer ranks among the top ten most common cancers, with an estimated 81,190 new cases and 17,240 deaths in 2021, according to the Cancer Observatory. Despite advancements in diagnostics and therapeutics, bladder cancer remains a significant challenge due to factors such as detection delays and ineffective biomarkers. The healthcare industry is dedicated to addressing these issues and improving patient outcomes through innovative approaches.
Additionally, nanobots, a promising technology, have emerged as a potential solution for early detection and targeted treatment of bladder cancer. These tiny robots can navigate through the urinary system, identifying and targeting cancer cells without harming healthy cells. Intravesical treatment, a common approach for superficial bladder cancer, involves administering anti-cancer drugs directly into the bladder. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the primary therapeutic methods for invasive bladder cancer. Immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, has shown promising results in clinical trials, with increasing adoption in the healthcare sector. Diagnostic techniques play a crucial role in the early detection and successful treatment of bladder cancer.
Moreover, cystoscopy, urine cytology, and biomarker tests are the primary methods for diagnosing bladder cancer. However, persistent bladder infections can complicate the diagnostic process, necessitating a thorough evaluation to distinguish between infection and cancer. Radiation therapy and immunotherapy are essential components of bladder cancer treatment. While radiation therapy destroys cancer cells using high-energy radiation, immunotherapy harnesses the power of the immune system to target and eliminate cancer cells. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in the market. Detection delays and ineffective biomarkers continue to impact patient outcomes. The healthcare industry must focus on improving diagnostic accuracy and developing more effective biomarkers to enhance early detection and improve treatment outcomes.
In conclusion, the market is driven by the need for innovative diagnostics and therapeutics to address the challenges of detection delays and ineffective biomarkers. Technologies such as nanobots, intravesical treatment, and immunotherapy are leading the way in the development of advanced solutions for bladder cancer. The healthcare sector must continue to invest in research and development to improve patient outcomes and ultimately, conquer this formidable disease. 

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Disease Type

  Transitional cell carcinoma
  Others


Drug Class

  Immunotherapy drugs
  Chemotherapy drugs
  Target therapy drugs


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK
    France
    Italy
    Spain


  Asia

    China
    India
    Japan


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Disease Type Insights

The transitional cell carcinoma segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Bladder cancer, specifically Transitional Cell Carcinoma (TCC), originates from the urothelial cells that line the interior of the bladder and other parts of the urinary tract, including the renal pelvis, ureters, and urethra. This type of cancer, also known as urothelial carcinoma, accounts for the majority of bladder cancer cases and is a significant focus in the global market for bladder cancer treatments. TCC can man